1, Do you agree that moral progress should be done to change the Islamic culture value

system?
Even though it may be difficult, I believe that moral progress should be immediately
directed toward Islamic culture in particular. The reason for this is that, while one
country's cultural value system is often an asset to its people, Islamic culture, on the other
hand, causes hardship for not just one, but the majority of women in this country. Gender
differences, in my opinion, should not be a source of discrimination or cause for shame or
regret.
As a result, Islamic women have a right to a decent life and should not be treated as
commodities. Because of their suffering, Islamic women seek equality in the West, which
is normal here. This is related to the second reason why the Islamic culture value system
needs to be adjusted: the negative influence that Islamic men have on the West. As stated
in the video, "it's a grave mistake to deny that the attackers' value system" may be a factor
contributing to rising social problems (such as groping, harassment, assaults, and rape).
From my perspective, moral progress should be made to change the Islamic culture value
system in order to improve the lives of not only Islamic women but also Western women,
so that everyone's equal life would be natural rather than a grant.

2. Express your point of view about non-cognitivism (culture relativism, emotivism,

subjectivism) in the line with moral progress in our society.
In my opinion, there are two sides to non-cognitivism in terms of moral progress, which
suggests that we should weigh our options carefully before making any changes. To
begin with, non-cognitivism may impair the moral progress of any culture that causes
hardship to its people. Culture relativism implies that moral progress is impossible
because the view of whether an action is morally right depends on one's cultural
approval; subjectivism implies that moral disagreement between individuals is nearly
impossible, which would not promote alternation; and emotivism implies that moral
utterances are not true or false, but rather expressions of emotions or attitudes.
As a result, if a culture requires immediate change, non-cognitivism may be ineffective.
Non-cognitivism, on the other hand, fosters cultural sympathies and understandings
because each culture has its own beliefs and ethics code. Non-cognitivism would benefit
in this case from the fact that each culture gains its own respect and appreciation.