1.

I think paparazzi drones should be banned, they completely disregard people’s right privacy,
it’s bard enough that the paparazzi has zoom lenses, and sitting trees and take secret
photos, but sending flying cameras down the street after celebrities or overrules into their
gardens and thru the windows, I think that’s horrible, and cruel to the people they’re
harassing. The xxxx press say that they are operating in the public interest. But that is just an
excuse to stocking people for money.
2. Well, I’m not in favor of invading someone’s privacy, off course. But I’m also not in favor of
banning drones without thinking about it properly just because famous people don’t like it.
There’s quite a lot media regulation already, and we need a free press. I agree that famous
people shouldn’t be stocked or harassed, but surely that drones are useful for researching
other new stories, and investigative journalism. In the US state of California, the police have
now been given the right to use drones without needing to ask for the mission first. So,
what’s the difference and who’s going to regulate it?