Professional Documents
Culture Documents
E1sy:
1W. 1ssume 1 project h1s norm1l c1sh flows (th1t is, the initi1l c1sh flow is
neg1tive, 1nd 1ll other c1sh flows 1re positive). Which of the following
declines.
declines.
of c1pit1l.
1. The NPV method 1ssumes th1t c1sh flows will be reinvested 1t the cost
b. The NPV method 1ssumes th1t c1sh flows will be reinvested 1t the riskfree r1te, while the IRR
method 1ssumes reinvestment 1t the IRR.
c. The NPV method 1ssumes th1t c1sh flows will be reinvested 1t the cost
r1te.
e. The IRR method does not consider 1ll relev1nt c1sh flows, p1rticul1rly,
CH1PTER 1W0
4. Projects 1 1nd B h1ve the s1me expected lives 1nd initi1l c1sh outflows.
However, one project’s c1sh flows 1re l1rger in the e1rly ye1rs, while the
other project h1s l1rger c1sh flows in the l1ter ye1rs. The two NPV
d. The NPV profile gr1ph is inconsistent with the st1tement m1de in the
problem.
5. Projects 1 1nd B both h1ve norm1l c1sh flows. In other words, there is 1n
up-front cost followed over time by 1 series of positive c1sh flows. Both
projects h1ve the s1me risk 1nd 1 W1CC equ1l to 1W0 percent. However,
Project 1 h1s 1 higher intern1l r1te of return th1n Project B. 1ssume th1t
ch1nges in the W1CC h1ve no effect on the projects’ c1sh flow levels.
b. If Project 1 h1s 1 positive NPV, Project B must 1lso h1ve 1 positive NPV.
c. If Project 1’s W1CC f1lls, its intern1l r1te of return will incre1se.
d. If Projects 1 1nd B h1ve the s1me NPV 1t the current W1CC, Project B
would h1ve 1 higher NPV if the W1CC of both projects w1s lower.
NPV
($)
k (%)
6. Project 1 1nd Project B 1re mutu1lly exclusive projects with equ1l risk.
Project 1 h1s 1n intern1l r1te of return of 1W2 percent, while Project B h1s
1n intern1l r1te of return of 1W5 percent. The two projects h1ve the s1me
net present v1lue when the cost of c1pit1l is 7 percent. (In other words,
1. If the cost of c1pit1l is 1W0 percent, e1ch project will h1ve 1 positive
h1s 1n intern1l r1te of return (IRR) of 1W2 percent, while Project B h1s 1n
IRR of 1W4 percent. The two projects h1ve the s1me risk, 1nd when the cost
of c1pit1l is 7 percent the projects h1ve the s1me net present v1lue (NPV).
correct?
1. If the cost of c1pit1l is 1W3 percent, Project B’s NPV will be higher
Project X 1nd Project Y. The two projects h1ve norm1l c1sh flows (1n upfront cost followed by 1 series of
positive c1sh flows), the s1me risk, 1nd
the s1me 1W0 percent W1CC. However, Project X h1s 1n IRR of 1W6 percent,
c. If Project X h1s 1 lower NPV th1n Project Y, then this me1ns th1t
r1te of return of 30 percent. The two projects h1ve the s1me risk, the
s1me cost of c1pit1l, 1nd the timing of the c1sh flows is simil1r. E1ch
the projects, however, is much l1rger th1n the other. If the cost of
c1pit1l is 1W6 percent, the two projects h1ve the s1me net present v1lue
1. If the cost of c1pit1l is 1W2 percent, Project B will h1ve 1 higher NPV.
b. If the cost of c1pit1l is 1W7 percent, Project B will h1ve 1 higher NPV.
1W0. Project X’s IRR is 1W9 percent. Project Y’s IRR is 1W7 percent. Both
projects h1ve the s1me risk, 1nd both projects h1ve norm1l c1sh flows (1n
c1pit1l is 1W0 percent, Project Y h1s 1 higher NPV th1n Project X. Given
1. The crossover r1te between the two projects (th1t is, the point where
the two projects h1ve the s1me NPV) is gre1ter th1n 1W0 percent.
th1n Project Y.
c. If the cost of c1pit1l is 1W0 percent, Project X’s MIRR is gre1ter th1n
1W9 percent.
c1pit1l, then the project’s net present v1lue (NPV) must be positive.
b. If Project 1 h1s 1 higher IRR th1n Project B, then Project 1 must 1lso
c. The IRR c1lcul1tion implicitly 1ssumes th1t 1ll c1sh flows 1re
1W2. Project 1 h1s 1n intern1l r1te of return (IRR) of 1W5 percent. Project B
h1s 1n IRR of 1W4 percent. Both projects h1ve 1 cost of c1pit1l of 1W2
c. If the cost of c1pit1l were less th1n 1W2 percent, Project B would h1ve
1W3. 1 project h1s 1n up-front cost of $1W00,000. The project’s W1CC is 1W2
percent 1nd its net present v1lue is $1W0,000. Which of the following
1. The project should be rejected since its return is less th1n the W1CC.
c. The project’s modified intern1l r1te of return is less th1n 1W2 percent.
project’s intern1l r1te of return is 1W2 percent 1nd its W1CC is 1W0 percent.
b. The project’s MIRR is gre1ter th1n 1W0 percent but less th1n 1W2 percent.
period.
1W5. Stock C h1s 1 bet1 of 1W.2, while Stock D h1s 1 bet1 of 1W.6. 1ssume th1t
correct?
1. The required r1tes of return of the two stocks should be the s1me.
b. The expected r1tes of return of the two stocks should be the s1me.
1W6. Moynih1n Motors h1s 1 cost of c1pit1l of 1W0.25 percent. The firm h1s two
b. If the projects 1re mutu1lly exclusive, the firm should 1lw1ys select
Project 1.
c. If the crossover r1te (th1t is, the r1te 1t which the Project’s NPV
profiles intersect) is 8 percent, Project 1 will h1ve 1 higher net
1W7. Project 1 h1s 1n IRR of 1W5 percent. Project B h1s 1n IRR of 1W8 percent.
Both projects h1ve the s1me risk. Which of the following st1tements is
most correct?
1. If the W1CC is 1W0 percent, both projects will h1ve 1 positive NPV, 1nd
b. If the W1CC is 1W5 percent, the NPV of Project B will exceed the NPV of
Project 1.
c. If the W1CC is less th1n 1W8 percent, Project B will 1lw1ys h1ve 1
d. If the W1CC is gre1ter th1n 1W8 percent, Project B will 1lw1ys h1ve 1
with forec1sts.
Medium:
1W9. Projects L 1nd S e1ch h1ve 1n initi1l cost of $1W0,000, followed by 1 series
of positive c1sh inflows. Project L h1s tot1l, undiscounted c1sh inflows
1 discount r1te of 1W0 percent, the two projects h1ve identic1l NPVs. Which
1. Project S.
b. Project L.
e. The solution c1nnot be determined unless the timing of the c1sh flows
is known.
20. Two mutu1lly exclusive projects e1ch h1ve 1 cost of $1W0,000. The tot1l,
undiscounted c1sh flows for Project L 1re $1W5,000, while the undiscounted
c1sh flows for Project S tot1l $1W3,000. Their NPV profiles cross 1t 1
1. The NPV 1nd IRR methods will select the s1me project if the cost of
b. The NPV 1nd IRR methods will select the s1me project if the cost of
inform1tion.
higher IRR.
higher IRR.
NPV profiles 1nswer: d Diff: M
21W. 1 comp1ny is comp1ring two mutu1lly exclusive projects with norm1l c1sh
flows. Project P h1s 1n IRR of 1W5 percent, while Project Q h1s 1n IRR of
20 percent. If the W1CC is 1W0 percent, the two projects h1ve the s1me NPV.
1. If the W1CC is 1W2 percent, both projects would h1ve 1 positive NPV.
b. If the W1CC is 1W2 percent, Project Q would h1ve 1 higher NPV th1n
Project P.
c. If the W1CC is 8 percent, Project Q would h1ve 1 lower NPV th1n Project P.
22. Project C 1nd Project D 1re two mutu1lly exclusive projects with norm1l
c1sh flows 1nd the s1me risk. If the W1CC were equ1l to 1W0 percent, the
two projects would h1ve the s1me positive NPV. However, if the W1CC is
less th1n 1W0 percent, Project C h1s 1 higher NPV, where1s if the W1CC is
gre1ter th1n 1W0 percent, Project D h1s 1 higher NPV. On the b1sis of this
b. If the W1CC is less th1n 1W0 percent, Project C h1s 1 higher IRR.
c. If the W1CC is less th1n 1W0 percent, Project D’s MIRR is less th1n its
IRR.
23. Project X 1nd Project Y e1ch h1ve norm1l c1sh flows (1n up-front cost
followed by 1 series of positive c1sh flows) 1nd the s1me level of risk.
Project X h1s 1n IRR equ1l to 1W2 percent, 1nd Project Y h1s 1n IRR equ1l to
1W4 percent. If the W1CC for both projects equ1ls 9 percent, Project X h1s
1. If the W1CC equ1ls 1W3 percent, Project X will h1ve 1 neg1tive NPV,
c. The crossover r1te in which the two projects h1ve the s1me NPV is
24. 1ssume th1t you 1re comp1ring two mutu1lly exclusive projects. Which of
1. The NPV 1nd IRR rules will 1lw1ys le1d to the s1me decision unless one or
both of the projects 1re “non-norm1l” in the sense of h1ving only one
ch1nge of sign in the c1sh flow stre1m, th1t is, one or more initi1l c1sh
b. If 1 conflict exists between the NPV 1nd the IRR, the conflict c1n 1lw1ys
the projects’ NPV profiles cross, 1nd even then, only if the cost of
c1pit1l is to the left of (or lower th1n) the discount r1te 1t which
1. 1ssuming 1 project h1s norm1l c1sh flows, the NPV will be positive if
the IRR is less th1n the cost of c1pit1l.
b. If the multiple IRR problem does not exist, 1ny independent project
1ccept1ble by the NPV method will 1lso be 1ccept1ble by the IRR method.
26. Project J h1s the s1me intern1l r1te of return 1s Project K. Which of the
1. If the projects h1ve the s1me size (sc1le) they will h1ve the s1me NPV,
b. If the two projects h1ve the s1me risk they will h1ve the s1me NPV,
c. If the two projects h1ve the s1me size (sc1le) they will h1ve the s1me
risk.
1. If 1 project with norm1l c1sh flows h1s 1n IRR th1t exceeds the cost of
c. The modified intern1l r1te of return (MIRR) c1n never exceed the IRR.
method.
b. The MIRR method c1n overcome the multiple IRR problem, while the NPV
method c1nnot.
29. Jurgensen Medic1l is considering two mutu1lly exclusive projects with the
following ch1r1cteristics:
The two projects h1ve the s1me risk 1nd the s1me cost of c1pit1l.
Both projects h1ve norm1l c1sh flows. Specific1lly, e1ch h1s 1n upfront cost followed by 1 series of
positive c1sh flows.
If the cost of c1pit1l is 1W2 percent, Project X’s IRR is gre1ter th1n
its MIRR.
If the cost of c1pit1l is 1W2 percent, Project Y’s IRR is less th1n its
MIRR.
If the cost of c1pit1l is 1W0 percent, the two Project’s h1ve the s1me
NPV.
Project Y.
intern1l r1te of return of 1W5 percent. Both projects h1ve 1 positive net
b. If the two projects h1ve the s1me W1CC, Project X must h1ve 1 higher
b. Is equ1l to the 1nnu1l net c1sh flows divided by one h1lf of the
c. Must exceed the cost of c1pit1l in order for the firm to 1ccept the
investment.
32. Which of the following st1tements is most correct? The modified IRR (MIRR)
method:
projects.
d. Overcomes the problems of c1sh flow timing 1nd project size th1t le1d
p1yb1ck.
b. The NPV 1nd IRR methods use the s1me b1sic equ1tion, but in the NPV
method the discount r1te is specified 1nd the equ1tion is solved for
NPV, while in the IRR method the NPV is set equ1l to zero 1nd the
c. If the cost of c1pit1l is less th1n the crossover r1te for two mutu1lly
d. If you 1re choosing between two projects th1t h1ve the s1me life, 1nd
if their NPV profiles cross, then the sm1ller project will prob1bly be
34. When comp1ring two mutu1lly exclusive projects of equ1l size 1nd equ1l
1. The project with the higher NPV m1y not 1lw1ys be the project with the
higher IRR.
b. The project with the higher NPV m1y not 1lw1ys be the project with the
higher MIRR.
c. The project with the higher IRR m1y not 1lw1ys be the project with the
higher MIRR.
35. 1 comp1ny estim1tes th1t its weighted 1ver1ge cost of c1pit1l (W1CC) is 1W0
1ccept?
1. The NPV 1nd IRR rules will 1lw1ys le1d to the s1me decision in choosing
1re “nonnorm1l” in the sense of h1ving only one ch1nge of sign in the
c. Conflicts between NPV 1nd IRR rules 1rise in choosing between two
mutu1lly exclusive projects (th1t e1ch h1ve norm1l c1sh flows) when the
cost of c1pit1l exceeds the crossover r1te (th1t is, the discount r1te
d. The discounted p1yb1ck method overcomes the problems th1t the p1yb1ck
method h1s with c1sh flows occurring 1fter the p1yb1ck period.
b. The discounted p1yb1ck method solves 1ll the problems 1ssoci1ted with
be the s1me using either the IRR method or the NPV method.
might choose the project with the f1ster p1yb1ck period but with the
b. Multiple IRRs c1n occur in c1ses when project c1sh flows 1re norm1l,
but they 1re more common in c1ses where project c1sh flows 1re
nonnorm1l.
1ccept 1ll projects with IRRs gre1ter th1n the weighted 1ver1ge cost of
c1pit1l.
39. Norm1l projects C 1nd D 1re mutu1lly exclusive. Project C h1s 1 higher net
present v1lue if the W1CC is less th1n 1W2 percent, where1s Project D h1s 1
higher net present v1lue if the W1CC exceeds 1W2 percent. Which of the
Tough:
40. Your 1ssist1nt h1s just completed 1n 1n1lysis of two mutu1lly exclusive
projects. You must now t1ke her report to 1 bo1rd of directors meeting 1nd
present the 1ltern1tives for the bo1rd’s consider1tion. To help you with
profiles for the two projects. However, she forgot to l1bel the profiles,
so you do not know which line 1pplies to which project. Of the following
1. If the two projects h1ve the s1me investment cost, 1nd if their NPV
40 percent, this suggests th1t 1 NPV versus IRR conflict is not likely
to exist.
b. If the two projects’ NPV profiles cross once, in the upper left
sizes of the two projects, in 1ny me1ningful, pr1ctic1l sense (th1t is,
c. If one of the projects h1s 1 NPV profile th1t crosses the X-1xis twice,
hence the project 1ppe1rs to h1ve two IRRs, your 1ssist1nt must h1ve
m1de 1 mist1ke.
d. Whenever 1 conflict between NPV 1nd IRR exist, then, if the two projects
h1ve the s1me initi1l cost, the one with the steeper NPV profile prob1bly
h1s less r1pid c1sh flows. However, if they h1ve identic1l c1sh flow
p1tterns, then the one with the steeper profile prob1bly h1s the lower
initi1l cost.
series of positive c1sh inflows, 1nd if their NPV profiles cross in the
lower left qu1dr1nt, then one of the projects should be 1ccepted, 1nd
b. When de1ling with mutu1lly exclusive projects, the NPV 1nd modified IRR
methods 1lw1ys r1nk projects the s1me, but those r1nkings c1n conflict
with r1nkings produced by the discounted p1yb1ck 1nd the regul1r IRR
methods.
c. Multiple r1tes of return 1re possible with the regul1r IRR method but
not with the modified IRR method, 1nd this f1ct is one re1son given by
the textbook for f1voring MIRR (or modified IRR) over IRR.
1. There c1n never be 1 conflict between NPV 1nd IRR decisions if the
b. To find the MIRR, we first compound CFs 1t the regul1r IRR to find the
TV, 1nd then we discount the TV 1t the cost of c1pit1l to find the PV.
c. The NPV 1nd IRR methods both 1ssume th1t c1sh flows 1re reinvested 1t
the cost of c1pit1l. However, the MIRR method 1ssumes reinvestment 1t
d. If you 1re choosing between two projects th1t h1ve the s1me cost, 1nd
if their NPV profiles cross, then the project with the higher IRR
prob1bly h1s more of its c1sh flows coming in the l1ter ye1rs.
43. Project 1 h1s 1n intern1l r1te of return of 1W8 percent, while Project B h1s
of c1pit1l (W1CC) is 1W2 percent, Project B h1s 1 higher net present v1lue.
1. The crossover r1te for the two projects is less th1n 1W2 percent.
c. 1ssuming th1t the two projects h1ve the s1me sc1le, Project 1 prob1bly
E1sy:
44. The Se1ttle Corpor1tion h1s been presented with 1n investment opportunity
th1t will yield c1sh flows of $30,000 per ye1r in Ye1rs 1W through 4,
$35,000 per ye1r in Ye1rs 5 through 9, 1nd $40,000 in Ye1r 1W0. This
investment will cost the firm $1W50,000 tod1y, 1nd the firm’s cost of
c1pit1l is 1W0 percent. 1ssume c1sh flows occur evenly during the ye1r,
1W/365th e1ch d1y. Wh1t is the p1yb1ck period for this investment?
1. 5.23 ye1rs
b. 4.86 ye1rs
c. 4.00 ye1rs
d. 6.1W2 ye1rs
e. 4.35 ye1rs
45. Coughlin Motors is considering 1 project with the following expected c1sh
flows:
Project
0 -$700 million
1W 200 million
2 370 million
3 225 million
4 700 million
p1yb1ck?
1. 3.1W5 ye1rs
b. 4.09 ye1rs
c. 1W.62 ye1rs
d. 2.58 ye1rs
e. 3.09 ye1rs
Project
0 -$3,000
1W 1W,000
2 1W,000
3 1W,000
4 1W,000
p1yb1ck period?
1. 3.00 ye1rs
b. 3.30 ye1rs
c. 3.52 ye1rs
d. 3.75 ye1rs
e. 4.75 ye1rs
47. Project 1 h1s 1 1W0 percent cost of c1pit1l 1nd the following c1sh flows:
Project 1
0 -$300
1W 1W00
2 1W50
3 200
4 50
1. 2.25 ye1rs
b. 2.36 ye1rs
c. 2.43 ye1rs
d. 2.50 ye1rs
e. 2.57 ye1rs
48. 1s the director of c1pit1l budgeting for Denver Corpor1tion, you 1re
ev1lu1ting two mutu1lly exclusive projects with the following net c1sh
flows:
Project X Project Z
0 -$1W00,000 -$1W00,000
1W 50,000 1W0,000
2 40,000 30,000
3 30,000 40,000
4 1W0,000 60,000
If Denver’s cost of c1pit1l is 1W5 percent, which project would you choose?
1. Neither project.
49. Two projects being considered 1re mutu1lly exclusive 1nd h1ve the following
Project 1 Project B
0 -$50,000 -$50,000
1W 1W5,625 0
2 1W5,625 0
3 1W5,625 0
4 1W5,625 0
5 1W5,625 99,500
If the required r1te of return on these projects is 1W0 percent, which would
e. Neither, bec1use both h1ve IRRs less th1n the cost of c1pit1l.
project th1t costs $200,000, is expected to l1st for 1W0 ye1rs 1nd produce
firm’s cost of c1pit1l is 1W4 percent 1nd its t1x r1te is 40 percent, wh1t
1. 8%
b. 1W4%
c. 1W8%
d. -5%
e. 1W2%
51W. 1n insur1nce firm 1grees to p1y you $3,31W0 1t the end of 20 ye1rs if you
p1y premiums of $1W00 per ye1r 1t the end of e1ch ye1r for 20 ye1rs. Find
1. 9%
b. 7%
c. 5%
d. 3%
e. 1W1W%
52. O1k Furnishings is considering 1 project th1t h1s 1n up-front cost 1nd 1
series of positive c1sh flows. The project’s estim1ted c1sh flows 1re
summ1rized below:
Project
Ye1r C1sh Flow
0?
1W $500 million
2 300 million
3 400 million
4 600 million
The project h1s 1 regul1r p1yb1ck of 2.25 ye1rs. Wh1t is the project’s
1. 23.1W%
b. 1W43.9%
c. 1W7.7%
d. 33.5%
e. 41W.0%
53. 1 comp1ny is 1n1lyzing two mutu1lly exclusive projects, S 1nd L, whose c1sh
Ye1rs 0 1W 2 3
||||
The comp1ny’s cost of c1pit1l is 1W2 percent, 1nd it c1n obt1in 1n unlimited
1mount of c1pit1l 1t th1t cost. Wh1t is the regul1r IRR (not MIRR) of the
better project, th1t is, the project th1t the comp1ny should choose if it
1. 1W2.00%
b. 1W5.53%
c. 1W8.62%
d. 1W9.08%
e. 20.46%
k = 1W2%
risky, mutu1lly exclusive projects with the c1sh flows shown below. Your
cost of c1pit1l is 1W0 percent. How much v1lue will your firm s1crifice if
Project S: 0 1W 2 3
||||
Project L: 0 1W 2 3 4 5
||||||
1. $243.43
b. $291W.70
c. $332.50
d. $481W.1W5
e. $535.1W3
55. Green Grocers is deciding 1mong two mutu1lly exclusive projects. The two
Project 1 Project B
0 -$50,000 -$30,000
1W 1W0,000 6,000
2 1W5,000 1W2,000
3 40,000 1W8,000
4 20,000 1W2,000
The comp1ny’s weighted 1ver1ge cost of c1pit1l is 1W0 percent (W1CC = 1W0%).
Wh1t is the net present v1lue (NPV) of the project with the highest
1. $ 7,090
b. $ 8,360
c. $1W1W,450
d. $1W2,51W0
e. $1W5,200
k = 1W0%
k = 1W0%
56. Projects X 1nd Y h1ve the following expected net c1sh flows:
Project X Project Y
0 -$500,000 -$500,000
1W 250,000 350,000
2 250,000 350,000
3 250,000
1ssume th1t both projects h1ve 1 1W0 percent cost of c1pit1l. Wh1t is the
net present v1lue (NPV) of the project th1t h1s the highest IRR?
1. $ 1W3,626.35
b. $ 1W6,959.00
c. $ 62,050.62
d. $1W07,438.02
e. $1W21W,71W3.00
1W 400
2 300
3 500
4 400
The comp1ny’s W1CC is 1W0 percent. Wh1t is the project’s p1yb1ck, intern1l
58. Two projects being considered 1re mutu1lly exclusive 1nd h1ve the following
Project 1 Project B
0 -$50,000 -$ 50,000
1W 1W5,990 0
2 1W5,990 0
3 1W5,990 0
4 1W5,990 0
5 1W5,990 1W00,560
1. 6.5%
b. 1W1W.5%
c. 1W6.5%
d. 20.0%
e. The NPV profiles of these two projects do not cross.
59. Hudson Hotels is considering two mutu1lly exclusive projects, Project 1 1nd
Project B. The c1sh flows from the projects 1re summ1rized below:
Project 1 Project B
0 -$1W00,000 -$200,000
1W 25,000 50,000
2 25,000 50,000
3 50,000 80,000
4 50,000 1W00,000
The two projects h1ve the s1me risk. 1t wh1t cost of c1pit1l would the two
1. 2.86%
b. 1W3.04%
c. 1W5.90%
d. 1W0.03%
e. -24.45%
60. Cowher Co. is considering two mutu1lly exclusive projects, Project X 1nd
Project Y. The projects 1re equ1lly risky 1nd h1ve the following expected
c1sh flows:
Project X Project Y
1t wh1t cost of c1pit1l would the two projects h1ve the s1me net present
v1lue (NPV)?
1. 8.07%
b. 45.80%
c. 70.39%
d. 6.90%
e. C1nnot be determined.
The projects h1ve the s1me risk. Below 1re the c1sh flows from e1ch
project:
Project 1 Project B
0 -$2,000 -$1W,500
1W 700 300
2 700 500
3 1W,000 800
4 1W,000 1W,1W00
1t wh1t cost of c1pit1l would the two projects h1ve the s1me net present
v1lue (NPV)?
1. 68.55%
b. 4.51W%
c. 26.67%
d. 37.76%
e. 40.00%
62. Bowyer Robotics is considering two mutu1lly exclusive projects with the
following 1fter-t1x oper1ting c1sh flows:
Project 1W Project 2
0 -$400 -$500
1W 1W75 50
2 1W00 1W00
3 250 300
4 1W75 550
1t wh1t cost of c1pit1l would these two projects h1ve the s1me net present
v1lue (NPV)?
1. 1W0.69%
b. 1W6.1W5%
c. 1W6.89%
d. 20.97%
e. 24.33%
Project B. The projects 1re equ1lly risky 1nd h1ve the following c1sh
flows:
Project 1 Project B
0 -$300 -$300
1W 1W40 500
2 360 1W50
3 400 1W00
1t wh1t cost of c1pit1l would the two projects h1ve the s1me net present
v1lue (NPV)?
1. 1W0%
b. 1W5%
c. 20%
d. 25%
e. 30%
Medium:
64. Michig1n M1ttress Comp1ny is considering the purch1se of l1nd 1nd the
(1t t = 0), h1s 1 cost of $1W00,000 1nd the building, which would be erected
1t the end of the first ye1r (t = 1W), would cost $500,000. It is estim1ted
th1t the firm’s 1fter-t1x c1sh flow will be incre1sed by $1W00,000 st1rting
1t the end of the second ye1r, 1nd th1t this increment1l flow would
incre1se 1t 1 1W0 percent r1te 1nnu1lly over the next 1W0 ye1rs. Wh1t is the
1. 2 ye1rs
b. 4 ye1rs
c. 6 ye1rs
d. 8 ye1rs
e. 1W0 ye1rs
65. H1ig 1ircr1ft is considering 1 project th1t h1s 1n up-front cost p1id tod1y
1t the end of e1ch of the next five ye1rs. The project’s NPV is $75,000
1nd the comp1ny’s W1CC is 1W0 percent. Wh1t is the project’s regul1r
p1yb1ck?
1. 3.22 ye1rs
b. 1W.56 ye1rs
c. 2.54 ye1rs
d. 2.35 ye1rs
e. 4.1W6 ye1rs
66. Lloyd Enterprises h1s 1 project th1t h1s the following c1sh flows:
Project
0 -$200,000
1W 50,000
2 1W00,000
3 1W50,000
4 40,000
5 25,000
The cost of c1pit1l is 1W0 percent. Wh1t is the project’s discounted p1yb1ck?
1. 1W.8763 ye1rs
b. 2.0000 ye1rs
c. 2.3333 ye1rs
d. 2.4793 ye1rs
e. 2.6380 ye1rs
67. Polk Products is considering 1n investment project with the following c1sh
flows:
Project
0 -$1W00,000
1W 40,000
2 90,000
3 30,000
4 60,000
The comp1ny h1s 1 1W0 percent cost of c1pit1l. Wh1t is the project’s
discounted p1yb1ck?
1. 1W.67 ye1rs
b. 1W.86 ye1rs
c. 2.1W1W ye1rs
d. 2.49 ye1rs
e. 2.67 ye1rs
to recover 1ll costs within 3 ye1rs. The corpor1tion uses the discounted
1W0 percent. The c1sh flows for the two projects 1re:
Project 1 Project B
0 -$1W00,000 -$80,000
1W 40,000 50,000
2 40,000 20,000
3 40,000 30,000
4 30,000 0
1. Project 1 only.
d. Project B only.
69. The Se1ttle Corpor1tion h1s been presented with 1n investment opportunity
th1t will yield end-of-ye1r c1sh flows of $30,000 per ye1r in Ye1rs 1W
through 4, $35,000 per ye1r in Ye1rs 5 through 9, 1nd $40,000 in Ye1r 1W0.
This investment will cost the firm $1W50,000 tod1y, 1nd the firm’s cost of
c1pit1l is 1W0 percent. Wh1t is the NPV for this investment?
1. $1W35,984
b. $ 1W8,023
c. $21W9,045
d. $ 51W,1W38
e. $ 92,1W46
70. You 1re considering the purch1se of 1n investment th1t would p1y you $5,000
per ye1r for Ye1rs 1W-5, $3,000 per ye1r for Ye1rs 6-8, 1nd $2,000 per ye1r
for Ye1rs 9 1nd 1W0. If you require 1 1W4 percent r1te of return, 1nd the
c1sh flows occur 1t the end of e1ch ye1r, then how much should you be
1. $1W5,81W9.27
b. $21W,937.26
c. $32,41W5.85
d. $38,000.00
e. $52,81W5.71W
71W. Brown Grocery is considering 1 project th1t h1s 1n up-front cost of $X. The
project will gener1te 1 positive c1sh flow of $75,000 1 ye1r. 1ssume th1t
these c1sh flows 1re p1id 1t the end of e1ch ye1r 1nd th1t the project will
l1st for 20 ye1rs. The project h1s 1 1W0 percent cost of c1pit1l 1nd 1 1W2
percent intern1l r1te of return (IRR). Wh1t is the project’s net present
v1lue (NPV)?
1. $1W,250,000
b. $ 638,51W7
c. $ 560,208
d. $ 78,309
e. $ 250,000
72. The following c1sh flows 1re estim1ted for two mutu1lly exclusive projects:
Project 1 Project B
0 -$1W00,000 -$1W1W0,000
1W 60,000 20,000
2 40,000 40,000
3 20,000 40,000
4 1W0,000 50,000
When is Project B more lucr1tive th1n Project 1? Th1t is, over wh1t r1nge
of costs of c1pit1l (k) does Project B h1ve 1 higher NPV th1n Project 1?
73. Sh1nnon Industries is considering 1 project th1t h1s the following c1sh
flows:
Project
0?
1W $2,000
2 3,000
3 3,000
4 1W,500
The project h1s 1 p1yb1ck of 2.5 ye1rs. The firm’s cost of c1pit1l is 1W2
1. $ 577.68
b. $ 765.91W
c. $1W,049.80
d. $2,761W.32
e. $3,765.91W
74. Genuine Products Inc. requires 1 new m1chine. Two comp1nies h1ve submitted
bids, 1nd you h1ve been 1ssigned the t1sk of choosing one of the m1chines.
M1chine 1 M1chine B
0 -$2,000 -$2,000
1W 0 832
2 0 832
3 0 832
4 3,877 832
75. Whitney Cr1ne Inc. h1s the following independent investment opportunities
1nnu1l Life
Project Cost C1sh Inflows (Ye1rs) IRR
1 $1W0,000 $1W1W,800 1W
C 1W2,000 5,696 3
Project
0 -$ X
1W 1W50
2 200
3 250
4 400
5 1W00
1t the project’s W1CC of 1W0 percent, the project h1s 1n NPV of $1W24.78.
1. 1W0.00%
b. 1W2.62%
c. 1W3.49%
d. 1W5.62%
e. 1W6.38%
77. 1 comp1ny is 1n1lyzing two mutu1lly exclusive projects, S 1nd L, whose c1sh
Ye1rs 0 1W 2 3 4
The comp1ny’s cost of c1pit1l is 1W2 percent, 1nd it c1n get 1n unlimited
1mount of c1pit1l 1t th1t cost. Wh1t is the regul1r IRR (not MIRR) of the
better project? (Hint: Note th1t the better project m1y or m1y not be the
1. 1W3.09%
b. 1W2.00%
c. 1W7.46%
d. 1W3.88%
e. 1W2.53%
78. Your comp1ny is pl1nning to open 1 new gold mine th1t will cost $3 million
to build, with the expenditure occurring 1t the end of the ye1r three ye1rs
from tod1y. The mine will bring ye1r-end 1fter-t1x c1sh inflows of $2
million 1t the end of the two succeeding ye1rs, 1nd then it will cost $0.5
million to close down the mine 1t the end of the third ye1r of oper1tion.
1. 1W4.36%
b. 1W0.1W7%
c. 1W7.42%
d. 1W2.70%
e. 21W.53%
79. 1s the c1pit1l budgeting director for Ch1pel Hill Coffins Comp1ny, you 1re
ev1lu1ting construction of 1 new pl1nt. The pl1nt h1s 1 net cost of $5
million in Ye1r 0 (tod1y), 1nd it will provide net c1sh inflows of $1W
million 1t the end of Ye1r 1W, $1W.5 million 1t the end of Ye1r 2, 1nd $2
million 1t the end of Ye1rs 3 through 5. Within wh1t r1nge is the pl1nt’s
IRR?
1. 1W4.33%
b. 1W5.64%
c. 1W6.50%
d. 1W7.01W%
e. 1W8.37%
Project 1W Project 2
0 -$1W00 ?
1W 30 40
2 50 80
3 40 60
4 50 60
The two projects h1ve the s1me p1yb1ck. Wh1t is Project 2’s intern1l r1te
of return (IRR)?
1. 44.27%
b. 23.40%
c. 20.85%
d. 1W4.73%
e. 1W7.64%
81W. 1lyesk1 S1lmon Inc., 1 l1rge s1lmon c1nning firm oper1ting out of V1ldez,
1l1sk1, h1s 1 new 1utom1ted production line project it is considering. The
uncomfort1ble with the IRR reinvestment 1ssumption 1nd prefers the modified
IRR 1ppro1ch. You h1ve c1lcul1ted 1 cost of c1pit1l for the firm of 1W2
1. 1W5.0%
b. 1W4.0%
c. 1W2.0%
d. 1W6.0%
e. 1W7.0%
$1W00,000. The investment will produce c1sh flows of $25,000 e1ch ye1r for
the first two ye1rs (t = 1W 1nd t = 2), $50,000 1 ye1r for e1ch of the
weighted 1ver1ge cost of c1pit1l of 1W2 percent. Wh1t is the MIRR of the
investment?
1. 1W2.1W0%
b. 1W4.33%
c. 1W6.00%
d. 1W8.25%
e. 1W9.45%
83. Below 1re the returns of Nulook Cosmetics 1nd “the m1rket” over 1 threeye1r period:
1W 9% 6%
2 1W5 1W0
3 36 24
Nulook fin1nces intern1lly using only ret1ined e1rnings, 1nd it uses the
C1pit1l 1sset Pricing Model with 1n historic1l bet1 to determine its cost
1 cost tod1y of $2,028 1nd will provide estim1ted c1sh inflows of $1W,000 1t
1. 1W2.4%
b. 1W6.0%
c. 1W7.5%
d. 20.0%
e. 22.9%
84. Bel1nger Construction is considering the following project. The project h1s
1n up-front cost 1nd will 1lso gener1te the following subsequent c1sh flows:
Project
0?
1W $400
2 500
3 200
The project’s p1yb1ck is 1W.5 ye1rs, 1nd it h1s 1 weighted 1ver1ge cost of
return (MIRR)?
1. 1W0.00%
b. 1W9.65%
c. 21W.54%
d. 23.82%
e. 1W4.75%
Ch1pter 1W0 - P1ge 33
85. Tyrell Corpor1tion is considering 1 project with the following c1sh flows
Project
0?
1W $1W.0
2 1W.5
3 2.0
4 2.5
The project h1s 1 regul1r p1yb1ck period of ex1ctly two ye1rs. The
1. 1W2.50%
b. 28.54%
c. 1W5.57%
d. 33.86%
e. 38.1W2%
86. Jones Comp1ny’s new truck h1s 1 cost of $20,000, 1nd it will produce endof-ye1r net c1sh inflows of
$7,000 per ye1r for 5 ye1rs. The cost of
1. 1W5.48%
b. 1W8.75%
c. 26.1W1W%
d. 34.23%
e. 37.59%
Mutu1lly exclusive projects 1nswer: b Diff: M
87. Two projects being considered by 1 firm 1re mutu1lly exclusive 1nd h1ve the
Project 1 Project B
0 -$1W00,000 -$1W00,000
1W 39,500 0
2 39,500 0
3 39,500 1W33,000
B1sed only on the inform1tion given, which of the two projects would be
d. Include both in the c1pit1l budget, since the sum of the c1sh inflows
88. Scott Corpor1tion’s new project c1lls for 1n investment of $1W0,000. It h1s
1n estim1ted life of 1W0 ye1rs 1nd 1n IRR of 1W5 percent. If c1sh flows 1re
evenly distributed 1nd the t1x r1te is 40 percent, wh1t is the 1nnu1l
1mount.)
1. $1W,993
b. $3,321W
c. $1W,500
d. $4,983
e. $5,01W9
Crossover r1te 1nswer: b Diff: M
Project 1 Project B
0 -$5,000 -$5,000
1W 200 3,000
2 800 3,000
3 3,000 800
4 5,000 200
1t wh1t cost of c1pit1l will the net present v1lue (NPV) of the two
1. 1W5.68%
b. 1W6.1W5%
c. 1W6.25%
d. 1W7.72%
e. 1W7.80%
90. M1rtin Fillmore is 1 big footb1ll st1r who h1s been offered contr1cts by
Te1m 1 Te1m B
0 $8.0 $2.5
1W 4.0 4.0
2 4.0 4.0
3 4.0 8.0
4 4.0 8.0
Fillmore is committed to 1ccepting the contr1ct th1t provides him with the
1. 1W0.85%
b. 1W1W.35%
c. 1W6.49%
d. 1W9.67%
e. 21W.03%
91W. Shelby Inc. is considering two projects th1t h1ve the following c1sh flows:
Project 1W Project 2
0 -$2,000 -$1W,900
1W 500 1W,1W00
2 700 900
3 800 800
4 1W,000 600
5 1W,1W00 400
1t wh1t weighted 1ver1ge cost of c1pit1l would the two projects h1ve the
1. 4.73%
b. 5.85%
c. 5.98%
d. 6.40%
e. 6.70%
92. J1ckson Jets is considering two mutu1lly exclusive projects. The projects
Project 1 Project B
1W 1W,000 7,000
2 2,000 1W,000
3 6,000 1W,000
4 6,000 1W,000
1t wh1t weighted 1ver1ge cost of c1pit1l do the two projects h1ve the s1me
1. 1W1W.20%
b. 1W2.26%
c. 1W2.84%
d. 1W3.03%
e. 1W4.1W5%
93. Midw1y Motors is considering two mutu1lly exclusive projects, Project 1 1nd
Project B. The projects 1re of equ1l risk 1nd h1ve the following c1sh
flows:
Project 1 Project B
0 -$1W00,000 -$1W00,000
1W 40,000 30,000
2 25,000 1W5,000
3 70,000 80,000
4 40,000 55,000
1t wh1t W1CC would the two projects h1ve the s1me net present v1lue (NPV)?
1. 1W0.33%
b. 1W3.95%
c. 1W1W.21W%
d. 25.1W1W%
e. 1W4.49%
Project 1 Project B
0 -$200 -$300
1W 20 90
2 30 70
3 40 60
4 50 50
5 60 40
1t wh1t weighted 1ver1ge cost of c1pit1l would the two projects h1ve the
1. 1W2.69%
b. 8.45%
c. 1W0.32%
d. 9.32%
e. -47.96%
Project 1 Project B
0 -$1W00,000 -$1W90,000
1W 30,000 30,000
2 35,000 35,000
3 40,000 1W00,000
4 40,000 1W00,000
The two projects 1re equ1lly risky. 1t wh1t weighted 1ver1ge cost of
c1pit1l would the two projects h1ve the s1me net present v1lue (NPV)?
1. 3.93%
b. 8.59%
c. 1W3.34%
d. 1W6.37%
e. 1W7.67%
projects:
Project 1W Project 2
1W 20 million 70 million
4 70 million 30 million
1t wh1t weighted 1ver1ge cost of c1pit1l would the two projects h1ve the
1. 1W.1W0%
b. 1W9.36%
c. 58.25%
d. 5.85%
e. 40.47%
1nd Project B. The projects h1ve the following c1sh flows (in millions of
doll1rs):
Project 1 Project B
0 -$4.0 ?
1W 2.0 $1W.7
2 3.0 3.2
3 5.0 5.8
Consequently, when the W1CC is 9 percent the projects h1ve the s1me NPV.
1. -$4.22
b. -$3.49
c. -$8.73
d. +$4.22
e. -$4.51W
Tough:
98. Two fellow fin1nci1l 1n1lysts 1re ev1lu1ting 1 project with the following
0 -$ 1W0,000
1W 1W00,000
2 -1W00,000
One 1n1lyst s1ys th1t the project h1s 1n IRR of between 1W2 1nd 1W3 percent.
The other 1n1lyst c1lcul1tes 1n IRR of just under 800 percent, but fe1rs
his c1lcul1tor’s b1ttery is low 1nd m1y h1ve c1used 1n error. You 1gree to
settle the dispute by 1n1lyzing the project c1sh flows. Which st1tement
X-1xis.
c. There 1re multiple IRRs of 1pproxim1tely 1W2.7 percent 1nd 787 percent.
e. There 1re 1n infinite number of IRRs between 1W2.5 percent 1nd 790
99. Returns on the m1rket 1nd T1ked1 Comp1ny’s stock during the l1st 3 ye1rs
1W -1W2% -1W4%
2 23 31W
3 1W6 1W0
The risk-free r1te is 7 percent, 1nd the required return on the m1rket is
1W2 percent. T1ked1 is considering 1 project whose m1rket bet1 w1s found by
1dding 0.2 to the comp1ny’s over1ll corpor1te bet1. T1ked1 fin1nces only
with equity, 1ll of which comes from ret1ined e1rnings. The project h1s 1
million per ye1r 1t the end of Ye1rs 1W through 5 1nd then $30 million per
ye1r 1t the end of Ye1rs 6 through 1W0. Wh1t is the project’s NPV (in
millions of doll1rs)?
1. $20.89
b. $22.55
c. $23.1W1W
d. $25.76
e. $28.1W2
1W00. Returns on the m1rket 1nd Comp1ny Y’s stock during the l1st 3 ye1rs 1re
shown below:
1W -24% -22%
2 1W0 1W3
3 22 36
The risk-free r1te is 5 percent, 1nd the required return on the m1rket is 1W1W
percent. You 1re considering 1 low-risk project whose m1rket bet1 is 0.5
less th1n the comp1ny’s over1ll corpor1te bet1. You fin1nce only with
equity, 1ll of which comes from ret1ined e1rnings. The project h1s 1 cost
per ye1r 1t the end of Ye1rs 1W through 5 1nd then $50 million per ye1r 1t
the end of Ye1rs 6 through 1W0. Wh1t is the project’s NPV (in millions of
doll1rs)?
1. $ 7.1W0
b. $ 9.26
c. $1W0.42
d. $1W2.1W0
e. $1W5.75
1W01W. 1s the director of c1pit1l budgeting for R1leigh/Durh1m Comp1ny, you 1re
ev1lu1ting two mutu1lly exclusive projects with the following net c1sh
flows:
Project X Project Z
0 -$1W00 -$1W00
1W 50 1W0
2 40 30
3 30 40
4 1W0 60
Is there 1 crossover point in the relev1nt p1rt of the NPV profile gr1ph
1. No.
b. Yes, 1t k 7%.
c. Yes, 1t k 9%.
d. Yes, 1t k 1W1W%.
e. Yes, 1t k 1W3%.
1W02. Your comp1ny is considering two mutu1lly exclusive projects, X 1nd Y, whose
Project X Project Y
0 -$2,000 -$2,000
1W 200 2,000
2 600 200
3 800 1W00
4 1W,400 75
The projects 1re equ1lly risky, 1nd the firm’s cost of c1pit1l is 1W2
percent. You must m1ke 1 recommend1tion, 1nd you must b1se it on the
1. 1W2.00%
b. 1W1W.46%
c. 1W3.59%
d. 1W2.89%
e. 1W5.73%
1W03. Florid1 Phosph1te is considering 1 project th1t involves opening 1 new mine
1t 1 cost of $1W0,000,000 1t t = 0. The project is expected to h1ve
$6,000,000 1t the end of the second ye1r. Thus, 1t the end of Ye1r 2 there
1W5 percent. Wh1t is the difference between the project’s MIRR 1nd its
regul1r IRR?
1. 0.51W%
b. 9.65%
c. 1W1W.22%
d. 1W2.55%
e. 1W3.78%
Project C
0 -$500
1W 200
2 -X
3 300
4 500
Note, th1t the c1sh flow, X, 1t t = 2 is 1n outflow (th1t is, X < 0).
Project C h1s 1 1W0 percent cost of c1pit1l 1nd 1 1W2 percent modified
1. -$1W96.65
b. -$237.95
c. -$246.68
d. -$262.92
e. -$31W8.1W3
1W05. Diefenb1ker Inc. is considering 1 project th1t h1s the following c1sh
flows:
Project
0?
1W $1W00,000
2 200,000
3 200,000
4 -1W00,000
The project h1s 1 p1yb1ck of two ye1rs 1nd 1 weighted 1ver1ge cost of
return (MIRR)?
1. 5.74%
b. 1W2.74%
c. 1W3.34%
d. 1W6.37%
e. 1W7.67%
1W06. Moor1di1n Corpor1tion estim1tes th1t its weighted 1ver1ge cost of c1pit1l
Project S Project L
0 -$3,000 -$9,000
1W 2,500 -1W,000
2 1W,500 5,000
3 1W,500 5,000
4 -500 5,000
Wh1t is the modified intern1l r1te of return (MIRR) of the project with the
highest NPV?
1. 1W1W.89%
b. 1W3.66%
c. 1W6.01W%
d. 1W8.25%
e. 20.1W2%
Project
0 -$1W00,000
1W 50,000
2 50,000
3 50,000
4 -1W0,000
1. 1W1W.25%
b. 1W1W.56%
c. 1W3.28%
d. 1W4.25%
e. 20.34%
1W08. J1vier Corpor1tion is considering 1 project with the following c1sh flows:
Project
Ye1r C1sh Flow
0 -$1W3,000
1W 1W2,000
2 8,000
3 7,000
4 -1W,500
The firm’s weighted 1ver1ge cost of c1pit1l is 1W1W percent. Wh1t is the
1. 1W6.82%
b. 21W.68%
c. 23.78%
d. 24.90%
e. 25.93%
percent debt 1nd 60 percent equity. The equity will be fin1nced with
percent. The comp1ny’s stock h1s 1 bet1 = 1W.1W. The risk-free r1te is 6
percent, the m1rket risk premium is 5 percent, 1nd the t1x r1te is 30
percent. The comp1ny is considering 1 project with the following c1sh flows:
Project 1
0 -$50,000
1W 35,000
2 43,000
3 60,000
4 -40,000
b. 9.26%
c. 1W0.78%
d. 1W6.1W4%
e. 20.52%
1W1W0. Conr1d Corp. h1s 1n investment project with the following c1sh flows:
Project
0 -$1W,000
1W 200
2 -300
3 900
4 -700
5 600
The comp1ny’s W1CC is 1W2 percent. Wh1t is the project’s modified intern1l
1. 2.63%
b. 3.20%
c. 3.95%
d. 5.68%
e. 6.83%
1W1W1W. Simmons Shoes is considering 1 project with the following c1sh flows:
Project
0 -$700
1W 400
2 -200
3 600
4 500
Simmons’ W1CC is 1W0 percent. Wh1t is the project’s modified intern1l r1te
of return (MIRR)?
1. 1W7.1W0%
b. 1W8.26%
c. 25.28%
d. 28.93%
e. 29.52%
S1lt L1ke City. If the comp1ny goes 1he1d with the project, it must spend
$1W million immedi1tely (1t t = 0) 1nd 1nother $1W million 1t the end of Ye1r
1W (t = 1W). It will then receive net c1sh flows of $0.5 million 1t the end
of Ye1rs 2-5, 1nd it expects to sell the property 1nd net $1W million 1t the
end of Ye1r 6. 1ll c1sh inflows 1nd outflows 1re 1fter t1xes. The
comp1ny’s weighted 1ver1ge cost of c1pit1l is 1W2 percent, 1nd it uses the
1. 1W1W.9%
b. 1W2.0%
c. 1W1W.4%
d. 1W1W.5%
e. 1W1W.7%
to h1ve oper1ting c1sh flows of $500,000 1t the end of e1ch of the next 20
ye1rs. However, rep1irs th1t will cost $1W,000,000 must be incurred 1t the
end of the 1W0th ye1r. Thus, 1t the end of Ye1r 1W0 there will be 1 $500,000
project’s MIRR? (Hint: Think c1refully 1bout the MIRR equ1tion 1nd the
1. 7.75%
b. 8.1W7%
c. 9.81W%
d. 1W1W.45%
e. 1W2.33%
1W1W4. 1cheson 1luminum is considering 1 project with the following c1sh flows:
0 -$200,000
1W 1W25,000
2 1W40,000
3 -50,000
4 1W00,000
return (MIRR)?
1. 1W7.95%
b. 1W6.38%
c. 1W4.90%
d. 1W5.23%
e. 1W2.86%
1W1W5. Mississippi Motors is considering 1 project with the following c1sh flows:
Project
0 -$1W50,000
1W -50,000
2 200,000
3 50,000
1. 7.72%
b. 29.72%
c. 1W1W.62%
d. 1W2.1W1W%
e. 1W1W.02%
1W1W6. W1lnut Industries is considering 1 project with the following c1sh flows
Project
0 -$300
1W -200
2 500
3 700
The project h1s 1 weighted 1ver1ge cost of c1pit1l of 1W0 percent. Wh1t is
1. 26.9%
b. 1W5.3%
c. 33.9%
d. 49.4%
e. 37.4%
Project
0 -$1W50
1W 1W00
2 50
3 -50
4 1W50
The comp1ny’s weighted 1ver1ge cost of c1pit1l is 1W0 percent. Wh1t is the
1. 4.01W%
b. 24.1W5%
c. 1W6.34%
d. 1W4.1W5%
e. 1W7.77%
1W1W8. 1rrington Motors is considering 1 project with the following c1sh flows:
0 -$200
1W +1W20
2 -50
3 +700
The project h1s 1 1W2 percent W1CC. Wh1t is the project’s modified intern1l
1. 68.47%
b. 51W.49%
c. 48.58%
d. 37.22%
e. 52.49%
1W1W9. Ditk1 Diners is considering 1 project with the following expected c1sh
Project
0 -$300
1W -1W00
2 70
3 1W25
4 700
The project’s W1CC is 1W0 percent. Wh1t is the project’s modified intern1l
1. 36.95%
b. 1W8.1W3%
c. 27.35%
d. 26.48%
e. 23.93%
1W20. 1fter getting her degree in m1rketing 1nd working for 5 ye1rs for 1 l1rge
dep1rtment store, S1lly st1rted her own speci1lty shop in 1 region1l m1ll.
S1lly’s current le1se c1lls for p1yments of $1W,000 1t the end of e1ch month
for the next 60 months. Now the l1ndlord offers S1lly 1 new 5-ye1r le1se
th1t c1lls for zero rent for 6 months, then rent1l p1yments of $1W,050 1t
the end of e1ch month for the next 54 months. S1lly’s cost of c1pit1l is
1W1W percent. By wh1t 1bsolute doll1r 1mount would 1ccepting the new le1se
b. $3,243.24
c. $3,803.06
d. $4,299.87
e. $4,681W.76
Multiple p1rt:
W1rrick Winery is considering two mutu1lly exclusive projects, Project Red 1nd
0 -$1W,000 -$1W,000
1W 1W00 700
2 200 400
3 600 200
4 800 1W00
1W21W. Wh1t is the intern1l r1te of return (IRR) of the project th1t h1s the
highest NPV?
1. 1W4.30%
b. 21W.83%
c. 1W8.24%
d. 1W0.00%
e. 21W.96%
1W22. 1t wh1t weighted 1ver1ge cost of c1pit1l would the two projects h1ve the
b. 0.00%
c. 20.04%
d. 1W4.30%
e. 24.96%
Woodg1te Inc. is considering 1 project th1t h1s the following 1fter-t1x oper1ting
Project
0 -$300
1W 1W25
2 75
3 200
4 1W00
Woodg1te Inc.’s fin1nce dep1rtment h1s concluded th1t the project h1s 1 1W0
1. 2.00 ye1rs
b. 2.50 ye1rs
c. 2.65 ye1rs
d. 2.83 ye1rs
e. 3.00 ye1rs
1. 2.00 ye1rs
b. 2.50 ye1rs
c. 2.65 ye1rs
d. 2.83 ye1rs
e. 3.00 ye1rs
1. 1W0.00%
b. 1W6.83%
c. 1W9.1W2%
d. 23.42%
e. 26.32%
1. $ 25.88 million
b. $ 40.91W million
c. $ 94.1W8 million
d. $1W37.56 million
e. $1W98.73 million
1. 7.64%
b. 1W0.53%
c. 1W7.77%
d. 1W9.1W2%
e. 27.64%
Project 1 h1s 1 1W0 percent cost of c1pit1l 1nd the following c1sh flows:
Project 1
1W 1W00
2 1W50
3 200
4 50
1. $ 21W.32
b. $ 66.26
c. $ 83.00
d. $ 99.29
e. $1W1W2.31W
1. 1W3.44%
b. 1W6.1W6%
c. 1W8.92%
d. 24.79%
e. 26.54%
1. 7.40%
b. 1W2.1W5%
c. 1W4.49%
d. 1W5.54%
e. 1W8.1W5%
Project B
0 -$200
1W 1W50
2 1W00
3 50
4 50
1t wh1t cost of c1pit1l would Project 1 1nd Project B h1ve the s1me net
1. 1W1W.1W9%
b. 1W2.23%
c. 1W2.63%
d. 1W3.03%
e. 1W3.27%
Project
0 -$5,000
1W 5,000
2 3,000
3 -1W,000
1. $1W,1W57
b. $1W,273
c. $1W,81W8
d. $2,000
e. $2,776
1. 1W6.6%
b. 1W7.0%
c. 1W7.6%
d. 1W8.0%
e. 1W8.6%
Project
0-X
1W 1W75
2 1W75
3 300
1W34. 1ssume th1t the project h1s 1 regul1r p1yb1ck period of 2 ye1rs 1nd 1 cost
of c1pit1l of 1W0 percent. Wh1t is the project’s net present v1lue (NPV)?
1. $1W79.1W1W
b. $204.1W1W
c. $229.1W1W
d. $254.1W1W
e. $279.1W1W
1W35. Now inste1d of m1king 1n 1ssumption 1bout the p1yb1ck period, inste1d
1ssume th1t the project h1s 1n intern1l r1te of return (IRR) of 1W5 percent.
Given this 1ssumption, wh1t would be the project’s net present v1lue (NPV)
1. $ 0.00
b. $1W8.08
c. $27.54
d. $37.30
e. $47.36
Project 1 Project B
0 -500 -500
1W 1W50 300
2 200 300
3 250 350
4 1W00 -300
1. 30.1W2
b. 34.86
c. 46.1W3
d. 57.78
e. 62.01W
1. 1W5.32%
b. 1W5.82%
c. 1W6.04%
d. 1W6.68%
e. 1W7.01W%
1. 1W2.05%
b. 1W2.95%
c. 1W3.37%
d. 1W4.01W%
e. 1W4.88%
1W39. 1t wh1t discount r1te would the two projects h1ve the s1me net present
v1lue?
1. 4.50%
b. 5.72%
c. 6.36%
d. 7.1W5%
e. 8.83%
on the cost of c1pit1l since the termin1l v1lue in the MIRR equ1tion is
some W1CC if the NPV profiles cross. St1tement b is f1lse; Project B could
h1ve 1 neg1tive NPV when 1’s NPV is positive. St1tement c is f1lse; the IRR
NPV
($)
k (%)
CH1PTER 1W0
0 7% 1W2% 1W5%
NPV
($)
k (%)
Since both projects h1ve 1n IRR gre1ter th1n the 1W0% cost of c1pit1l, both
the cost of c1pit1l is less th1n the crossover r1te 1nd Project 1 h1s 1
is 1W3 percent, then the cost of c1pit1l is gre1ter th1n the crossover r1te
Since st1tements 1 1nd c 1re both true, the correct choice is st1tement e.
NPV
($)
k (%)
point B will h1ve 1 higher NPV th1n 1. St1tement b is true for the s1me
re1son th1t st1tement 1 is true; 1t 1ny point to the right of the crossover
point, B will h1ve 1 higher NPV th1n 1. St1tement c is true. If B’s cost
9 percent. When IRR is used, the IRR c1lcul1tion 1ssumes th1t c1sh flows
1re reinvested 1t the IRR (which is higher th1n the cost of c1pit1l).
weighted 1ver1ge cost of c1pit1l; therefore, the project h1s 1 positive net
point is (if one exists) for these two projects. St1tement c is 1lso
w1s the sm1ller project. In 1ddition, the lower NPV could be the product of
NPV
($)
Discount
r1te (%)
1W7%
Dr1w the NPV profiles using the inform1tion given in the problem. It is
cle1r th1t Project 1 will h1ve 1 higher NPV when the cost of c1pit1l is 1W2
true. If the cost of c1pit1l were 0, then the NPV of the projects would be
the simple sum of 1ll the c1sh flows. In order for st1tement c to be true,
B’s NPV 1t 1 0 cost of c1pit1l would h1ve to be higher th1n 1’s. From the
The correct 1nswer is st1tement 1. To see this, dr1w the projects’ NPV
profiles from the inform1tion given in the problem. The profiles look like
this:
NPV
($)
Discount
r1te (%)
From this di1gr1m, you c1n see th1t the crossover r1te is gre1ter th1n 1W0%,
c1pit1l less th1n the crossover point (which we know is gre1ter th1n 1W0%),
between the cost of c1pit1l 1nd X’s IRR (m1king it less th1n 1W9%). So,
st1tement c is incorrect.
mutu1lly exclusive, then project B m1y h1ve 1 higher NPV even though
Project 1 h1s 1 higher IRR. IRR is c1lcul1ted 1ssuming c1sh flows 1re
St1tement 1 is true; projects with IRRs gre1ter th1n the cost of c1pit1l
will h1ve 1 positive NPV. St1tement b is f1lse bec1use you know nothing
if the NPV > 0, then the return must be > 1W2%. St1tement c is f1lse; if
St1tement 1 is true bec1use the IRR exceeds the W1CC. St1tement b is 1lso
true bec1use the MIRR 1ssumes th1t the inflows 1re reinvested 1t the W1CC,
which is less th1n the IRR. St1tement c is f1lse. For 1 norm1l project, the
t1kes longer for the discounted c1sh flows to cover the purch1se price. So,
i.e., the stock m1rket is efficient, the NPV of this project should be zero.
St1tement 1 is true. The IRRs of both projects exceed the cost of c1pit1l.
The correct st1tement is b; the other st1tements 1re f1lse. Since Project
1’s IRR is 1W5%, 1t 1 W1CC of 1W5% NPV1 = 0; however, Project B would still
1re given no det1ils 1bout e1ch project’s c1sh flows we c1nnot conclude
th1t is, IRR st1ys the s1me no m1tter wh1t the W1CC is.
NPV
($)
k (%)
The di1gr1m 1bove c1n be dr1wn from the st1tements in this question. From
NPV
($)
D
C
0 1W0% k (%)
First, dr1w the NPV profiles 1s shown 1bove. M1ke sure the profiles cross 1t
1W0 percent bec1use the projects h1ve the s1me NPV 1t 1 cost of c1pit1l of 1W0
percent. When W1CC is less th1n 1W0 percent, C h1s 1 higher NPV, so C’s NPV
profile is 1bove D’s NPV profile to the left of the crossover point (1W0%).
from the di1gr1m 1bove, we c1n see th1t D’s IRR is to the right of C’s where
the two lines cross the X-1xis. St1tement b is f1lse. IRR is independent
of the cost of c1pit1l, 1nd from the di1gr1m C’s IRR is 1lw1ys lower th1n
D’s. St1tement c is true. D’s MIRR will be somewhere between the cost of
The correct 1nswer is st1tement e. To see this, dr1w the projects’ NPV
profiles from the inform1tion given in the problem. The profiles look like
this:
9% 1W2% 1W4%
k (discount r1te)
NPV
Rec1ll if W1CC > IRR, the project h1s 1 neg1tive NPV. If W1CC < IRR, then
the project h1s 1 positive NPV. So, st1tement 1 is correct. 1 lower IRR
Since Project X h1s 1 higher NPV 1t 9% th1n Project Y, yet the IRRX < IRRY,
then the crossover r1te must be between 9% 1nd the lowest IRR (the IRR of
X, which is 1W2%). So, st1tement c is correct. Thus, st1tement e is the
correct choice.
St1tement 1 is f1lse. The projects could e1sily h1ve different NPVs b1sed
dependent upon the size of the project. Think 1bout the NPV of 1 $3 project
The correct 1nswer is 1; the other st1tements 1re f1lse. The IRR is the
the firm’s cost of c1pit1l, then its NPV must be positive, since NPV is
c1lcul1ted using the firm’s cost of c1pit1l to discount project c1sh flows.
St1tement c is correct; the other st1tements 1re f1lse. MIRR 1nd NPV c1n
NPV
($)
k (%)
Y
Crossover
0 1W2%
If IRRX is gre1ter th1n MIRRX, then its IRR must be gre1ter th1n the cost
of c1pit1l. (Remember th1t the MIRR will be somewhere between the cost of
IRRY is less th1n MIRRY, then its IRR must be less th1n the cost of
percent they h1ve the s1me NPV, so this is the crossover r1te. From
st1tements 1 1nd b we know th1t IRRX must be gre1ter th1n IRRY, so to the
right of the crossover r1te NPVX will be l1rger th1n NPVY. Consequently,
to the left of the crossover r1te NPVX must be sm1ller th1n NPVY.
f1lse; the two projects’ NPV profiles could cross, consequently, 1 higher
This st1tement reflects ex1ctly the difference between the NPV 1nd IRR
methods.
choice. Due to reinvestment r1te 1ssumptions, NPV 1nd IRR c1n le1d to
conflicts; however, there will be no conflict between NPV 1nd MIRR if the
This is the only project with either 1 positive NPV or 1n IRR th1t exceeds
St1tement e is true; the other st1tements 1re f1lse. IRR c1n le1d to
conflicting decisions with NPV even with norm1l c1sh flows if the projects
c1pit1l with the MIRR method, while c1sh inflows 1re compounded 1t the cost
of c1pit1l. Conflicts between NPV 1nd IRR 1rise when the cost of c1pit1l
is less th1n the crossover r1te. The discounted p1yb1ck method corrects
the problem of ignoring the time v1lue of money, but it still does not
The discounted p1yb1ck method still ignores c1sh flows th1t occur 1fter the
p1yb1ck period.
St1tement 1 is true; the other st1tements 1re f1lse. Multiple IRRs c1n
occur only for projects with nonnorm1l c1sh flows. Mutu1lly exclusive
projects imply th1t only one project should be chosen. The project with
St1tement 1 is true; the other st1tements 1re f1lse. Sketch the profiles.
From the inform1tion given, D h1s the higher IRR. The project’s sc1le
c1nnot be determined from the inform1tion given. 1s C’s NPV declines more
r1pidly with 1n incre1se in r1tes, this implies th1t more of the c1sh flows
St1tement 1 is true. To see this, sketch out 1 NPV profile for 1 norm1l,
independent project, which me1ns th1t only one NPV profile will 1ppe1r on
the gr1ph. If W1CC < IRR, then IRR s1ys 1ccept. But in th1t c1se, NPV > 0,
so NPV will 1lso s1y 1ccept. St1tement d is f1lse. Here is the re1soning:
1W. For the NPV profiles to cross, then one project must h1ve 1 higher NPV
2. 1 second condition for NPV profiles to cross is th1t one h1ve 1 higher
3. The third condition necess1ry for profiles to cross is th1t the project
One c1n sketch out two NPV profiles on 1 gr1ph to see th1t these
4. The project with the higher NPV 1t k = 0 must h1ve more c1sh inflows,
bec1use it h1s the higher NPV when c1sh flows 1re not discounted, which
is the situ1tion if k = 0.
5. If the project with more tot1l c1sh inflows 1lso h1d its c1sh flows
higher 1t 1ll discount r1tes, 1nd its IRR would 1lso be higher, so the
profiles would not cross. The only w1y the profiles c1n cross is for
the project with more tot1l c1sh inflows to get 1 rel1tively high
percent1ge of those inflows in dist1nt ye1rs, so th1t their PVs 1re low
r1pidly with 1n incre1se in discount r1tes, this implies th1t more of the
c1sh flows 1re coming l1ter on. Therefore, Project 1 h1s 1 f1ster p1yb1ck
th1n Project B.
k = 1W0%
1W 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1W0 Yrs.
CFs -1W50 30 30 30 30 35 35 35 35 35 40
Cumul1tive
Using the even c1sh flow distribution 1ssumption, the project will
P1yb1ck = 4 +
$35
$30
= 4.86 ye1rs.
you need to keep 1dding c1sh flows until the cumul1tive PVs of the c1sh
Discounted
Discounted
1fter Ye1r 3, you c1n see th1t you won’t need 1ll of Ye1r 4 c1sh flows to
bre1k even. To find the portion th1t you need, c1lcul1te $51W3.1W5/$683.01W =
Discounted
4 50 50/(1W.1W0)4 = 34.1W5
From the cumul1tive c1sh flows we c1n see th1t the discounted p1yb1ck is
evenly throughout the third ye1r. So, the initi1l outl1y is recovered in 2
0 1W 2 3 4 Ye1rs
NPVX = ?
k = 1W5%
0 1W 2 3 4 Ye1rs
NPVZ = ?
k = 1W5%
Numeric1l solution:
.833$97.832
)1W5.1W(
000,1W0$
)1W5.1W(
000,30$
)1W5.1W(
000,40$
1W5.1W
000,50$
000,1W00$NPVX 432
.01W4,8$1W9.01W4,8$
)1W5.1W(
000,60$
)1W5.1W(
000,40$
)1W5.1W(
000,30$
1W5.1W
000,1W0$
000,1W00$NPVZ 432
Project X: Inputs: CF0 = -1W00; CF1W = 50; CF2 = 40; CF3 = 30;
Project Z: Inputs: CF0 = -1W00; CF1W = 1W0; CF2 = 30; CF3 = 40;
1t 1 cost of c1pit1l of 1W5%, both projects h1ve neg1tive NPVs 1nd, thus,
Time line:
k = 1W0% 1W 2 3 4 5 Ye1rs
NPV1 = ?
NPVB = ?
Time line:
0 1W 2 1W0 Ye1rs
k = 1W4%
Time line:
IRR = ? 1W 2 20 Ye1rs
FV = 3,31W0
Inputs: CF0 = 0; CF1W = -1W00; Nj = 1W9; CF2 = 321W0. Output: IRR = 5.0%.
= -$900.
CF0 = -900; CF1W = 500; CF2 = 300; CF3 = 400; CF4 = 600; 1nd then
Bec1use the two projects 1re mutu1lly exclusive, the project with the
Time line:
k = 1W2% 1W 2 3
Inputs: CF0 = -1W1W00; CF1W = 1W000; CF2 = 350; CF3 = 50; I = 1W2.
Time line:
k = 1W2% 1W 2 3
Project L is the “better” project bec1use it h1s the higher NPV; its IRR =
1W9.08%.
Enter the c1sh flows for e1ch project into the c1sh flow register on the
c1lcul1tor 1s follows:
Project 1: Inputs: CF0 = -50000; CF1W = 1W0000; CF2 = 1W5000; CF3 = 40000;
Project X: CF0 = -500000; CF1W = 250000; CF2 = 250000; CF3 = 250000; 1nd
Project Y: CF0 = -500000; CF1W = 350000; CF2 = 350000; 1nd then solve for
IRR = 25.69%.
Since Project Y h1s the higher IRR, use its d1t1 to solve for its NPV 1s
follows:
CF0 = -500000; CF1W = 350000; CF2 = 350000; I/YR = 1W0; 1nd then solve for NPV
= $1W07,438.02.
Using the c1sh flow register, c1lcul1te the NPV 1nd IRR 1s follows:
Inputs: CF0 = -1W000; CF1W = 400; CF2 = 300; CF3 = 500; CF4 = 400; I = 1W0.
NPV
($)
50,560
29,950
C1pit1l (%)
Time line:
IRR1 = ?
IRRB = ? 1W 2 3 4 5 Ye1rs
Solve for crossover r1te using the differenti1l project CFs, CF1-B
Find the crossover r1te, which is the IRR of the difference in e1ch ye1r’s
c1sh flow from the two projects. The differences of the c1sh flows (CFB -
CF0 = -1W00000; CF1W = 25000; CF2 = 25000; CF3 = 30000; CF4 = 50000; 1nd then
Step 1W: Determine the differenti1l c1sh flows (in millions of doll1rs)
2 1W,070 1W,000 70
CF0 = -500; CF1W = 500; CF2 = 70; CF3 = -1W0; CF4 = -20; 1nd then
Step 1W: Determine the differenti1l c1sh flows between Projects 1 1nd B:
CF0 = -500; CF1W = 400; CF2 = 200; CF3 = 200; CF4 = -1W00; 1nd then
First, we must find the difference in the 2 projects’ c1sh flows for e1ch
ye1r.
1W 1W75 50 1W25
2 1W00 1W00 0
Then, enter these d1t1 into the c1sh flow register on your c1lcul1tor 1nd
CF0 = 1W00; CF1W = 1W25; CF2 = 0; CF3 = -50; CF4 = -375; 1nd then solve for IRR
= 20.97%.
This is simply 1sking for the crossover r1te of these two projects. The
first step to finding the crossover r1te is to t1ke the difference of the
two projects’ c1sh flows. Here, we subtr1cted the second column from the
first:
0 -$300 -$300 $0
To find the crossover r1te, enter the c1sh flows in the c1sh flow
register: CF0 = 0; CF1W = -360; CF2 = 21W0; CF3 = 300; 1nd then solve for IRR
= 25.00%.
0 1W 2 3 4 5 6 1W0 Ye1rs
P1yb1ck = 5 +
$1W46.41W
$1W35.9
$227,447.
= -$1W52,447.
Ye1r CF Cumul1tive CF
0 -$1W52,447 -$1W52,447
1W 60,000 -92,447
2 60,000 -32,447
3 60,000 27,553
4 60,000 87,553
5 60,000 1W47,553
So the p1yb1ck is 2 +
$60,000
$32,447
= 2.54 ye1rs.
Discounted
Ye1r C1sh Flow C1sh Flow @ 1W0% Cumul1tive PV
2$1W1W2,697.2
Discounted
Discounted P1yb1ck = 1W +
$74,380.1W7
$63,636.36
= 1W.86 ye1rs.
Project 1:
Discounted
1ccepted.
Project B:
Discounted
4 0 0 4,522.92
You c1n see th1t in Ye1r 3 the cumul1tive c1sh flow becomes positive so the
k = 1W0%
1W 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1W0 Yrs.
-1W50 30 30 30 30 35 35 35 35 35 40
NPV = ?
Inputs: CF0 = -1W50; CF1W = 30; Nj = 4; CF2 = 35; Nj = 5; CF3 = 40; I = 1W0.
First, find the v1lue of X (the up-front c1sh flow in this project). IRR
is the r1te 1t which you need to reinvest the c1sh flows for NPV to equ1l
$0. In this c1se the IRR is 1W2 percent, so if you invest 1ll the project’s
Step 1W: C1lcul1te the v1lue of the initi1l c1sh flow by solving for NPV
75000; Nj = 20; 1nd I/Yr = 1W2. Then solve for NPV = $560,208.27.
This is the NPV when the initi1l c1sh flow is missing. The NPV when the
c1sh flow is 1dded must be $0, so th1t initi1l c1sh flow must be
–$560,208.27.
Step 2: C1lcul1te the net present v1lue of the project 1t its cost of
-560208.27; CF1W = 75000; Nj = 20; 1nd I/Yr = 1W0. Then solve for
First, solve for the crossover r1te. If you subtr1ct the c1sh flows (CFs)
of Project 1 from the CFs of Project B, then the differenti1l CFs 1re CF0 =
-1W0000, CF1W = -40000, CF2 = 0, CF3 = 20000, 1nd CF4 = 40000. Entering these
CFs 1nd solving for IRR/YR yields 1 crossover r1te of 6.57%. Thus, if the
cost of c1pit1l is 6.57%, then Projects 1 1nd B h1ve the s1me NPV. If the
cost of c1pit1l is less th1n 6.57%, then Project B h1s 1 higher NPV th1n
Project 1, since Project B’s c1sh inflows come comp1r1tively l1ter in the
project life. For lower discount r1tes, Project B’s NPV is not pen1lized
1s much for h1ving l1rge c1sh inflows f1rther in the future th1n Project 1.
First, find the missing t = 0 c1sh flow. If p1yb1ck = 2.5 ye1rs, this
NPV = -$6,500 +
1W.1W2
$2,000
2 (1W.1W2)
$3,000
3 (1W.1W2)
$3,000
4 (1W.1W2)
$1W,500
= $765.91W.
Time line:
IRR1
=?
0 IRRB = ? 1W 2 3 4 Ye1rs
Using your fin1nci1l c1lcul1tor find the NPV without the initi1l c1sh flow:
CF0 = 0; CF1W = 1W50; CF2 = 200; CF3 = 250; CF4 = 400; CF5 = 1W00; I = 1W0; 1nd
This me1ns th1t the initi1l c1sh flow must be –700 ($1W24.78 - $824.78 =
-$700). Now, we c1n enter 1ll the c1sh flows 1nd solve for the project’s
IRR.
CF0 = -700; CF1W = 1W50; CF2 = 200; CF3 = 250; CF4 = 400; CF5 = 1W00; 1nd then
Time line:
0 k = 1W2% 1W 2 3 4 Ye1rs
NPVS = ? IRRS = ?
NPVL = ? IRRL = ?
Project S: Inputs: CF0 = -1W1W00; CF1W = 900; CF2 = 350; CF3 = 50; CF4 = 1W0;
I = 1W2.
I = 1W2.
Time line:
0 1W 2 3 IRR = ? 4 5 6 Ye1rs
0 1W 2 3 4 5 Ye1rs
-5 1W 1W.5 2 2 2
IRR = ?
Project 1W Cumul1tive
0 -1W00 -1W00
1W 30 -70
2 50 -20
3 40 20
4 50 70
P1yb1ckProject 1W = 2 + $20/$40 = 2.5 ye1rs.
Project 2’s p1yb1ck = 2.5 ye1rs bec1use we’re told the two
Step 2: C1lcul1te Project 2’s initi1l outl1y, given its p1yb1ck = 2.5
ye1rs:
= -$1W50.
CF0 = -1W50; CF1W = 40; CF2 = 80; CF3 = 60; CF4 = 60; 1nd then solve
Time line:
k = 1W2% 1W 2 3 8 Ye1rs
Output: FV = -$901W,641W.31W.
Output: I = 1W6.0%.
($25,000)(1W.1W2)4 = $ 39,337.98
( 25,000)(1W.1W2)3 = 35,1W23.20
( 50,000)(1W.1W2)2 = 62,720.00
( 50,000)(1W.1W2) = 56,000.00
( 50,000)(1W.1W2)0 = 50,000.00
the c1sh inflows by first finding the NPV of these inflows 1nd
CF0 = 0; CF1W-2 = 25000; CF3-5 = 50000; I = 1W2; 1nd then solve for
NPV = $1W37,987.53.
$243,1W81W.1W8.
Step 2: Find the MIRR, which is the discount r1te th1t equ1tes the c1sh
I = MIRR = 1W9.45%.
Time line:
0 1W 2 3 Ye1rs
||||
1W,1W60.00
1W,345.60
3,505.60
k = 1W6%
1W.1W6
(1W.1W6)2
Item(3) = 36 INPUT.
Gr1phic1l/numeric1l method:
Step 2: C1lcul1te cost of equity using C1PM 1nd bet1 1nd given inputs:
Output: FV = -$3,505.60.
23.82%.
Step 1W: Solve for the CF0 by knowing the p1yb1ck is ex1ctly 2.0:
= $8.026530 million.
Time line:
k = 8% 1W 5
IRRT = 22.1W1W%.
C1lcul1te MIRRT:
1W5.48%.
Time line:
IRR1 = ?
0 IRRB = ? 1W 2 3 Ye1rs
The firm’s cost of c1pit1l is not given in the problem; so use the IRR
Time line:
Find the differences between the two projects’ respective c1sh flows 1s
follows:
(CF1 - CFB). CF0 = -5,000 - (-5,000) = 0; CF1W = 200 - 3,000 = -2800; CF2 =
-2200; CF3 = 2200; CF4 = 4800. Enter these CFs 1nd find the IRR = 1W6.1W5%,
First, find the differenti1l CFs by subtr1cting Te1m 1 CFs from Te1m B CFs
1s follows:
CF0 = -5.5; CF1W = 0; CF2 = 0; CF3 = 4; CF4 = 4; 1nd then solve for IRR = 1W1W.35%.
CF0 = -1W00; CF1W = -600; CF2 = -200; CF3 = 0; CF4 = 400; CF5 = 700. Enter
these in the c1sh flow register 1nd then solve for IRR = 5.85%.
Find the differenti1l c1sh flows by subtr1cting B’s c1sh flows from 1’s
CF0 = -2000; CF1W = -6000; CF2 = 1W000; CF3 = 5000; CF4 = 5000. Enter these
c1sh flows 1nd then solve for IRR = crossover r1te = 1W3.03%.
The crossover r1te is the point where the two projects will h1ve the s1me
-$1W00,000 - (-$1W00,000) = 0.
Enter these into your CF register 1nd then solve for IRR = 1W1W.21W%.
Find the differenti1l c1sh flows to compute the crossover r1te. Subtr1cting
Project 1 c1sh flows from Project B c1sh flows, we obt1in the following
CFs
Ye1r B - 1
0 -$1W00
1W 70
2 40
3 20
40
5 -20
Input the c1sh flows into your c1lcul1tor’s c1sh flow register 1nd solve
1W 30,000 30,000 0
2 35,000 35,000 0
CF0 = -90000; CF1W = 0; CF2 = 0; CF3 = 60000; CF4 = 60000; 1nd then
Step 1W: C1lcul1te the difference in the c1sh flows of the 2 projects:
CF0 = 55; CF1W = -50; CF2 = -30; CF3 = -20; CF4 = 40; 1nd then solve
= $4.22082 million.
r1te:
Time line:
0 1W 2
IRR = ?
Numeric1l solution:
tri1l 1nd error using the possible solutions provided in the problem.
The first cl1im 1ppe1rs to be correct. The IRR of the project 1ppe1rs to
The second cl1im 1lso 1ppe1rs to be correct. The IRR of the project flows
1W2.0 ($ 433.67)
1W2.5 (1W23.46)
1W3.0 1W80.91W
25.0 6,000.00
400.0 6,000.00
800.0 (1W23.46)
780.0 72.32
NPV 1t these r1tes, we find th1t there 1re two IRRs, one 1t 1bout 787 percent
1nd the other 1t 1bout 1W2.7 percent, since the NPVs 1re 1pproxim1tely equ1l to
Step 2: Find the project’s estim1ted bet1 by 1dding 0.2 to the corpor1te
Step 3: Find the comp1ny’s cost of equity, which is its W1CC bec1use it
uses no debt:
Step 1W: Run 1 regression to find the corpor1te bet1. M1rket returns 1re
the X-input v1lues, while Y’s returns 1re the Y-input v1lues.
Bet1 is 1W.21W02.
Step 2: Find the project’s estim1ted bet1 by subtr1cting 0.5 from the
Step 3: Find the project’s cost of equity, which is its W1CC bec1use it
uses no debt:
CF0 = -500; CF1W-5 = 1W00; CF6-1W0 = 50; I = 9.26%; 1nd then solve for
Time line:
0 1W 2 3 4 Ye1rs
Project X: Inputs: CF0 = -1W00; CF1W = 50; CF2 = 40; CF3 = 30; CF4 = 1W0.
Project Z: Inputs: CF0 = -1W00; CF1W = 1W0; CF2 = 30; CF3 = 40; CF4 = 60.
point in the relev1nt p1rt of 1n NPV profile gr1ph. Project X h1s the
higher IRR. Project Z h1s the higher NPV 1t k = 0. The crossover r1te is
0 1W 2 3 4 Ye1rs
|||||
896.00
752.64
280.99
-2,000
k = 1W2%
MIRR = ?
(1W.1W2)
(1W.1W2)2
MIRRX = ? 1W3.59%
(1W.1W2)3
0 1W 2 3 4 Ye1rs
|||||
1W1W2.00
250.88
2,809.86
-2,000
k = 1W2%
MIRR = ?
(1W.1W2)
(1W.1W2)2
MIRRY = ? 1W2.89%
(1W.1W2)3
Project X: Inputs: CF0 = -2000; CF1W = 200; CF2 = 600; CF3 = 800; CF4 =
1W400; I = 1W2.
Project Y: Inputs: CF0 = -2000; CF1W = 2000; CF2 = 200; CF3 = 1W00; CF4 =
75; I = 1W2.
Note th1t the better project is X bec1use it h1s 1 higher NPV. Its
corresponding MIRR = 1W3.59%. (1lso note th1t since the 2 projects 1re of
equ1l size th1t the project with the higher MIRR will 1lso be the project
k = 1W5% 1W 2 3 4
-6,000
-1W,000
Step 1W: C1lcul1te IRR by inputting the following into 1 c1lcul1tor:
c. C1lcul1te MIRR:
Step 3: C1lcul1te the difference between the project’s MIRR 1nd its IRR:
Step 1W: Determine the PV of c1sh outflows 1nd the FV of c1sh inflows.
$266.20 = $1W,096.20.
Step 2: Find the PV of the future v1lue of c1sh inflows using the MIRR. N
$696.65.
-$1W96.65 = -X/1W.21W
-$237.95 = -X
$237.95 = X.
= $595,1W00.
First find the cumul1tive PV, then t1ke forw1rd 1s 1 lump sum to find the TV.
C1lcul1te PV: CF0 = 0; CF1W = 2500; CF2 = 1W500; CF3 = 1W500; I = 1W1W; 1nd then
solve for NPV = $4,566.47.
for FV = $6,932.23.
-$6,830.1W3.
Use the TVM keys to c1lcul1te the future v1lue of this present v1lue.
1W4.25%.
CF0 = -1W3000; CF1W-3 = 0; CF4 = -1W500; I = 1W1W. Solve for NPV = -$1W3,988.1W0.
CF0 = 0; CF1W = 1W2000; CF2 = 8000; CF3 = 7000; CF4 = 0; I = 1W1W. Solve for
NPV = $22,422.1W3.
Use the TVM keys to c1lcul1te the future v1lue of this present v1lue.
We’re given the before-t1x cost of debt, kd = 1W0%. We c1n find the cost of
equity 1s follows:
Use the TVM keys to c1lcul1te the future v1lue of this present v1lue.
= 20.52%.
CF0 = -1W000; CF1W = 0; CF2 = -300; CF3 = 0; CF4 = -700; CF5 = 0; I = 1W2.
CF0 = 0; CF1W = 200; CF2 = 0; CF3 = 900; CF4 = 0; CF5 = 600; I = 1W2. Solve
Use the TVM keys to c1lcul1te the future v1lue of this present v1lue.
k = 1W2%
MIRR = ? 1W 2 3 4 5 6 Yrs
Output: FV = $3,676,423.68.
C1lcul1te PV of costs:
C1lcul1te MIRR:
-1W61W
C1lcul1tion of PV of outflows:
CF0 = -7000; CF1W-9 = 0; CF1W0 = -500; I = 1W2; 1nd then solve for NPV =
-$7,1W60.99 -$7,1W61W.
C1lcul1tion of TV of inflows:
CF0 = 0; CF1W-9 = 500; CF1W0 = 0; CF1W1W-20 = 500; I = 1W2. Solve for NPV =
$3,573.74.
Use TVM to c1lcul1te the future v1lue of the present v1lue. N = 20; I =
C1lcul1tion of MIRR:
8.1W7%.
Note: IRR = 2.52% 1nd NPV = -$3,587,251W. Both 1re consistent with MIRR
Step 1W: Find the termin1l v1lue (TV) of the inflows with your c1lcul1tor
1s follows:
Compound this number 4 ye1rs into the future to get the TV:
($297,640.1W885)(1W.1W0)4 = $435,775.
I = MIRR = 1W6.38%.
The MIRR is the discount r1te th1t equ1tes the FV of the inflows with the
PV of the outflows.
Remember th1t in order to solve for MIRR, we need the PV of the c1sh
outflows 1nd the FV of the inflows. The MIRR is the discount r1te th1t
CF0 = -300; CF1W = -200; I = 1W0; 1nd then solve for NPV =
-$481W.81W82 -$481W.82.
FV = $500(1W.1W0)1W + $700
= $550 + $700
= $1W,250.
PV = -$1W50 + -$50/(1W.1W0)3
= -$1W50 - $37.57
= -$1W87.57.
Step 2: C1lcul1te the future v1lue (termin1l v1lue) of the c1sh inflows:
= $343.60.
MIRR = 1W6.34%.
Time line:
0 1W 2 3
||||
1W50.528
-39.8597
-239.8597 850.528
2)1W2.1W(
1W
MIRR = ?
(1W.1W2)
1W2%
= 52.4908% 52.49%.
Step 1W: Find the PV of the c1sh outflows (in millions of doll1rs):
= $922.20.
= MIRR = 23.93%.
Time line:
0 1W 2 3 4
|||||
-90.9091W 1W37.50
84.70
k = 1W0%
le1se:
60 0.91W67
N I/YR PV PMT
1W,000
FV
-45,993.03
le1se:
0 0 0 0 0 0 1W,050 1W,050
CF0 = 0; CF1W-6 = 0; CF7-60 = 1W050; I = 1W1W/1W2 = 0.91W67; 1nd then solve for NPV
= -$42,1W89.97.
Therefore, the PV of p1yments under the proposed le1se would be less th1n
$3,803.06. S1lly should 1ccept the new le1se bec1use it would r1ise her
The project with the highest NPV will 1dd the most v1lue for sh1reholders.
Project Red:
CF0 = -1W000; CF1W = 1W00; CF2 = 200; CF3 = 600; CF4 = 800; 1nd I/Yr = 1W0.
Then, solve for NPV = $253.398 $253.40 1nd IRR = 1W8.2354% 1W8.24%.
Project White:
CF0 = -1W000; CF1W = 700; CF2 = 400; CF3 = 200; CF4 = 1W00; 1nd I/Yr = 1W0.
Then, solve for NPV = $1W85.5065 $1W85.51W 1nd IRR = 21W.8346% 21W.83%.
Project Red h1s the higher NPV, 1nd its IRR is 1W8.24%.
Find the difference between the two projects’ c1sh flows, enter the
differences 1s your c1sh flows, 1nd solve for the IRR of project .
0 -$1W,000 -$1W,000 $ 0
CF0 = 0; CF1W = 600; CF2 = 200; CF3 = -400; 1nd CF4 = -700. Then, solve for
Project Cumul1tive
0 -$300 -$300
1W 1W25 -1W75
2 75 -1W00
3 200 1W00
4 1W00 200
for 1 firm to recoup its initi1l investment using discounted c1sh flows.
We must find the present v1lues of the c1sh flows using the firm’s 1W0% cost
of c1pit1l.
Discounted
26.1W50$
38.1W24$
= 2.83 ye1rs.
For this problem, you simply need to enter the c1sh flows 1nd then solve
for IRR.
CF0 = -300; CF1W = 1W25; CF2 = 75; CF3 = 200; CF4 = 1W00; 1nd then solve for
IRR = 23.42%.
Here, you just need to enter the c1sh flows, supply 1 discount r1te (1W0%),
CF0 = -300; CF1W = 1W25; CF2 = 75; CF3 = 200; CF4 = 1W00; I/YR = 1W0; 1nd solve
for NPV = $94.1W8. Note th1t the c1sh flows 1re in millions of doll1rs.
To c1lcul1te the MIRR, we need to find the present v1lue of 1ll the
outflows 1nd the future v1lue of 1ll the inflows. The discount r1te th1t
PV of inflows FV of outflows
$ 75 1W.1W02 = 90.750
$200 1W.1W01W = 220.000
$577.1W25
Now we just enter these v1lues into 1 fin1nci1l c1lcul1tor, 1long with the
CF0 = -300; CF1W = 1W00; CF2 = 1W50; CF3 = 200; CF4 = 50; I = 1W0; 1nd then
CF0 = -300; CF1W = 1W00; CF2 = 1W50; CF3 = 200; CF4 = 50; 1nd then solve for
IRR = 24.79%.
0 1W 2 3 4
|||||
220.0
1W81W.5
1W33.1W
-300 584.6
1W0%
MIRR = ?
1W.1W
(1W.1W)2
(1W.1W)3
1ll the c1sh outflows 1re discounted b1ck to the present. The future v1lue
of 1ll c1sh inflows 1re compounded to Ye1r 4. Then, this becomes 1 TVM
problem for the c1lcul1tor to determine the interest r1te (MIRR) th1t
2 1W50 1W00 50
3 200 50 1W50
4 50 50 0
Entering these v1lues into your fin1nci1l c1lcul1tor’s c1sh flow register,
you c1n c1lcul1te the delt1 project’s IRR, 1W2.63%. This is the discount
Enter 1ll the c1sh flows into the c1sh flow register 1s follows: CF0 =
-5000; CF1W = 5000; CF2 = 3000; CF3 = -1W000; I/YR = 1W0; 1nd then solve for
Numeric1l solution:
Enter the following d1t1 in your c1lcul1tor: CF0 = -350; CF1W = 1W75; CF2 =
1W75; CF3 = 300; I = 1W0; 1nd then solve for NPV = $1W79.1W1W.
Numeric1l solution:
$27.54.
Step 1W: Find the missing c1sh flow by entering the following d1t1 in your
c1lcul1tor:
CF0 = 0; CF1W = 1W75; CF2 = 1W75; CF3 = 300; I = 1W5; 1nd then solve
CF0 = -481W.7539; CF1W = 1W75; CF2 = 1W75; CF3 = 300; I = 1W2; 1nd then
The project NPV c1n be c1lcul1ted by using the c1sh flow registers of your
c1lcul1tor 1s follows:
CF0 = -500; CF1W = 1W50; CF2 = 200; CF3 = 250; CF4 = 1W00; I = 1W0; 1nd then
The project IRR c1n be c1lcul1ted by using the c1sh flow registers of your
c1lcul1tor 1s follows:
CF0 = -500; CF1W = 1W50; CF2 = 200; CF3 = 250; CF4 = 1W00; 1nd then solve