Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1077
Price :
OUR PUBLICATIONS
SRI TIRUMALESH KI SANNIDHI
(Hindi) - Dr. Puttaparthi
Nagapadmini
SRI PADMAVATI SANNIDHI
(Hindi) - Prof. I.N.Chandrasekar
Reddy
SRI VENKATACHALA
MAHATHMYAM (Hindi) - Prof. Yaddanapudi
Venkataramana Rao
GOMATHA - JAGANMATHA - Prof. Yaddanapudi
Venkataramana Rao
LEGENDS OF NAYANMARS
(English) - Smt. Sripada Divya
SRIMAD VALMIKI RAMAYANA
AT A GLANCE (English) - Prof. A. S. Raja Rao
vi vii
x xi
1
1.1 1
1.2 4
1.3 13
1.4 17
2
2.1 25
2.2 27
2.3
28
2.4 29
3. 33
4. 36
5. 42
6.
50
7. 56
8. 66
9. 73
10. 82
xviii
1.
1.1
2 3
1
1.
4 5
1.2
6 7
8 9
1
1.
12 13
1.3
14 15
1
1.
23
2.
24 25
2.1
26 27
1
2.2
60
1.
28 29
2.3
2.4
30 31
37
4.
1
1.
38 39
40 41
5.
44 45
46 47
54 55
7.
58 59
60 61
8.
68 69
70 71
9.
74 75
80 81
89
92 93
94 95
98 99
104 105
108
12.
110 111
13.
114 115
117
120 121
124 125
126 127
130 131
132
15.
134 135
136 137
140 141
142 143
148 149
150 151
152 153
154 155
156 157
158 159
160 161
162 163
164 165
167
170 171
172 173
174 175
176 177
180 181
17. 183
185
188 189
190 191
192 193
194
19.
196 197
204 205
206 207
210 211
212 213
214 215
216
20.
218 219
220 221
224 225
226 227
228 229
231
21.
232 233
238 239
243
22.
244 245
246 247
248 249
250
her in good looking girl, and not cut off her nose making an ugly girl
uglier.
This incident shows that the princes had neither culture nor
chivalry. After all Surpanakha was a woman, whatever might be her
looks and whatever might be her race".
Some believers in the Avathara aspect of Rama and Lakshmana
silently or openly approve this most dis - graceful conduct of the
brothers, presumably on the ground that avathars could do no wrong.
"When surpanakha saw Rama by chance she fell in love with If faith and hero - worship deprives a man of his reason, and excess
him and solicited his hand. There was nothing wrong in this. Rama of these virtues deprives him of even his common sense”. My studies
did not reciprocate her love. There was nothing wrong in this either. in the Ramayanas - by P.H. Gupta, Page 162, 163.
The brothers at first cut jokes at her expense when she continued to
exhibit her excessive love for Rama they punished her for her
impertinence by cutting off her nose and ears.
Shri C. Rajagoplachary justifies this behaviour of the brothers
in the following sentences:
“Some critic might ask whether it was proper thus to torment
a woman, especially a woman in love. But if we exercise our imagi-
nation and have before as a monster of ugliness we can understand
the situation. It is true that she could assume a charming form if she
chose but in her intoxication of lust, she seems to have omitted even
this allurement” (His Ramayana, Chapter 31)
Is ugliness a crime ? Is ugliness an object for merrument ? If
Surpanakha was really ugly was it her fault or of her creator ?
If Surpanakha was in truth a 'monster of ugliness' the broth-
ers, if they were kind hearted being Avathars, should have changed
260 261
262 263
264 265
266 267
268 269
270 271
272
282 283
55, 56
284 285
288 289
290 291
293
302 303