Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Regina Nishiyama
English 1302
Mr. W Nolen
13 February 2022
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the lives of people all over the world in many
negative ways. Besides physical, measurable data on how COVID-19 affects health, researchers
are still trying to figure out the mental aspect of COVID. A major attribute of this pandemic and
the mental health affects is the time people have spent in isolation. Isolation in itself comes with
negative effects to mental health and mixing the effects of isolation with a new and unknown
virus has been a terrain many people are still navigating. This article covers the effects of
isolation and how well one is able to be productive versus when they are not isolated.
Many people have gone from living their regular day to day lives, and then instantly
having to stay home and stay put because they contracted COVID-19. This is exactly how the
experiment started with my subject. They spent three days at school, practice, and work going
through their daily routine and getting their work done. After those three days the subject
contracted covid, and had to be put into isolation. Because the subject lives at home with their
family who did not contract the virus, they were completely isolated and spent ten days in their
room. Food and any other necessities were brought to their door to avoid contact with anyone,
Using the screen time average from a span of six days, provided from an iPhone, the
number of hours spent on the phone are able to show how productive the subject was that day. If
the screen time was high, the subject spent less time being productive and more time using the
Nishiyama 2
iPhone for entertainment. Three days of screen time where the subject was not in isolation due to
COVID-19 were compared to three days of screen time where the subject was in isolation.
Productivity was also measured by the amount of homework or time studying the subject was
On the first non-isolated day the subject accumulated a total of eight hours and twenty-
five minutes of screen time and was able to finish reading two articles and one assignment for
two different classes. On the second non-isolated day, the subject spent seven hours and thirty-
four minutes on their phone and was able to finish three assignments for two different classes.
On the third non-isolated day, the subject recorded five hours and thirty-six minutes of screen
time and finished one quiz and read one two chapters for two different classes. After these three
days, the subject was put into isolation due to COVID-19, and noticeably their screen time went
up and productivity went down due to the negative effects of the isolation. On the first isolated
day, the subject accumulated fifteen hours and fifty-seven minutes of screen time, almost twice
the time compared to the first non-isolated day. On the second isolated day, the subject spent
eighteen hours and fifty-two minutes on their phone and still made no improvement on studying
on homework. On the third isolated day, the subject recorded seventeen hours and five minutes
of screen time and only did one assignment for one class.
Noticeably, the data collected from the first three days to the last three days, doubles
denoting less productivity. The numbers collected allow for a simple conclusion: isolation has a
negative effect on productivity. According to the subject, being in the same environment for
relaxation and work made them feel like they were “never able to walk away to relax and forget
about work” in order to have motivation to do their work. The subject also stated that “isolation
kept [them] feeling overwhelmed and unmotivated to advance on work.” The subject also shared
Nishiyama 3
that “spending time on [their] phone allowed them to feel less isolated from everyone, and so
[they] continued to spend more time on it in order to feel less alone.” The following emotional
data accounts for why the screen time doubled and emphasizes the negative effects of isolation
on productivity.
While the research aforementioned, was conducted on only one subject, Toscano and
Zappala were able to conduct research measuring remote work satisfaction during the COVID-19
pandemic on a larger scale of people. They used a 15 question 5-point Likert scale questionnaire
on a group of 265 people ranging from age and gender, to assess the feelings people had while
working from home. According to the article, “results show that social isolation is negatively
related to remote work satisfaction” (Toscano, Zappala 2020). They were able to back this
conclusion up with a line graph showing a negative correlation between remote work satisfaction
and social isolation (Toscano, Zappala 2020). This information is relevant because it highlights
the negative effects the COVID-19 isolation had on the productivity of those who were
The two different experiments lead readers to the same conclusion that isolation due to
COVID-19 has negative effects on productivity. Although the first experiment was simpler and
on a smaller scale, the results still showed a decrease in productivity during isolation. The second
experiment was able to find that isolation does decrease productivity, but the more a subject is
worried about COVID-19, the more it affects their productivity and stress levels.
Although a similar larger scale experiment has been done, this experiment is able to add
the effects of screen time reducing the feeling of isolation while negatively affecting
productivity. This is substantial because although the subject was able to find a way to decrease
Nishiyama 4
the negative effects isolation has on mental health, such as feelings of loneliness, the loss of
productivity poses a new problem: how to feel less isolated while still being productive.
One would assume that removing all distractions and isolating themselves would help
them improve productivity, but from the aforementioned research, data shows that isolation
negatively affects productivity. The first study was able to provide how a subject would use their
iPhone as a way to feel less isolated and in turn negatively affect their productivity. The second
study adds to this information by providing more evidence that isolation is not good for
productivity.
Nishiyama 5
Work Cited
Toscano, Ferdinando, and Salvatore Zappalà. “Social Isolation and Stress as Predictors of
Pandemic: The Role of Concern about the Virus in a Moderated Double Mediation.”
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/9804.