Professional Documents
Culture Documents
E1sy:
1. Firms use defensive t13ti3s to fight off undesired mergers. These t13ti3s
in3lude
B. Whi3h of the following 1re given 1s re1sons for the high level of merger
industries.
3H1PTER B1
MERGERS 1ND 13QUISITIONS
3h1pter B1 - P1ge B
3orre3t?
be31use 1 firm is 13quired from its owners, not from its 3reditors.
b. Two key items needed to 1pply the D3F 1ppro13h to v1luing 1 business
1re (1) pro form1 st1tements th1t fore31st the in3rement1l free 31sh
flows expe3ted to result from the merger 1nd (B) 1 dis3ount r1te, or
b. 13quiring firms never 1ssume the debt of the t1rget firm, so new debt
must be obt1ined by the 13quiring firm 1nd the interest expense of this
hostile t1keover?
1. Est1blishing 1 poison pill provision.
t1keover.
3h1pter B1 - P1ge 3
Medium:
1. T1x 3onsider1tions often pl1y 1 p1rt in mergers. If one firm h1s ex3ess
d. M1n1gers who pur3h1se other firms often 1ssert th1t the new 3ombined
1. 1 firm 13quiring 1nother firm in 1 horizont1l merger will not h1ve its
required r1te of return 1ffe3ted be31use the two firms will h1ve
simil1r bet1s.
b. Fin1n3i1l theory s1ys th1t the 3hoi3e of how to p1y for 1 merger is
return.
3. The b1si3 r1tion1le for 1ny fin1n3i1l merger is synergy 1nd thus,
of the 1n1lysis.
d. In most mergers, the benefits of synergy 1nd the pri3e premium the
13quirer p1ys over m1rket pri3e 1re summed 1nd then divided equ1lly
1lso possible th1t mergers 31n in3lude 1spe3ts of both oper1ting 1nd
fin1n3i1l mergers.
1. Lever1ged buyouts (LBOs) o33ur when 1 firm issues equity 1nd uses the
3. Firms 1re un1ble to sell 1ny 1ssets in the first five ye1rs following 1
lever1ge buyout.
3h1pter B1 - P1ge 4
merger.
b. 1 defensive merger o33urs when the firm’s m1n1gers merge with 1nother
hostile t1keover.
E1sy:
merger will result in in3rement1l net 31sh flows with 1 present v1lue of
$7B.5B million, 1nd they h1ve determined th1t the 1ppropri1te dis3ount r1te
1. $16.B5
b. $16.97
3. $17.4B
d. $18.13
e. $19.00
13. 1 p1rent holding 3omp1ny sells sh1res in its subsidi1ry su3h th1t the
p1rent now owns only 65 per3ent of the subsidi1ry 1nd thus, the t1x returns
1. 10.B%; $B,B45,000
b. 10.B%; $B,135,000
3. B3.8%; $1,905,000
d. 10.B%; $1,750,000
e. 34.0%; $1,650,000
3h1pter B1 - P1ge 5
3h1in, E1stern Pizz1. 1meri31n’s 1n1lysts proje3t th1t the merger will
Ye1r B, $5 million in Ye1r 3, 1nd $117 million in Ye1r 4. (The Ye1r 4 31sh
estim1ted to be B.0, 1nd its post-merger t1x r1te would be 34 per3ent. The
risk-free r1te is 8 per3ent, 1nd the m1rket risk premium is 4 per3ent. Wh1t
1. 17%
b. 16%
3. 15%
d. 14%
e. 1B%
Medium:
15. Firm 1, whi3h is 3onsidering 1 verti31l merger with 1nother firm, Firm T,
equilibrium. If the 3ombined firm will be one 1nd one-h1lf times 1s l1rge
1s the 13quiring firm using book v1lues wh1t will be the bet1 of the new
merged firm?
1. 1.B0
b. 1.45
3. 1.59
d. 1.7B
e. B.00
sm1ller 3h1in, Southern 1uto. Pit Row’s 1n1lysts proje3t th1t the merger
Ye1r 4 31sh flow in3ludes 1 termin1l v1lue of $107 million. 1ssume 1ll 31sh
flows o33ur 1t the end of the ye1r. The 13quisition would be m1de
to be B.0, 1nd its post-merger t1x r1te would be 34 per3ent. The risk-free
r1te is 8 per3ent, 1nd the m1rket risk premium is 4 per3ent. Wh1t is the
b. $67.00 million
3. $7B.5B million
d. $81.93 million
e. $88.B3 million
3h1pter B1 - P1ge 6
17. Mod1l Systems 3urrently h1s tot1l 1ssets of $10 million 1nd 1 debt to tot1l
Qui3kswit3h 3omp1ny th1t h1s tot1l 1ssets of $6 million 1nd 1 D/T1 r1tio of
70 per3ent. If the 3omponent 3osts of 31pit1l for the 3ombined firm will
1. 15.00%
b. 13.65%
3. 1B.66%
d. 11.49%
e. 9.75%
18. K1rol K1r, In3. is 3onsidering the 13quisition of North St1r, In3. North
St1r is expe3ted to provide K1rol K1r with oper1ting 31sh flows of $14, $19,
$B0, 1nd $10 million over the next four ye1rs. In 1ddition, the termin1l
v1lue of 1ll rem1ining 31sh flows 1t the end of Ye1r 4 is estim1ted 1t $18
million. The merger will 3ost K1rol K1r $41 million whi3h is due now in
31sh in 1 single lump sum. If the v1lue of the merger is estim1ted 1t $6.00
per sh1re 1nd K1rol K1r h1s B,000,000 sh1res outst1nding, wh1t equity
1. 1B.4B%
b. 15.86%
3. 17.B4%
d. 19.60%
e. B8.44%
Tough:
Bl1zer expe3ts to re3eive net 31sh flows from L1ker of $9 million the first
ye1r. For the se3ond ye1r, L1ker is expe3ted to h1ve EBIT of $B5 million
1nd interest expense of $5 million. 1lso, in the se3ond ye1r only, L1ker
1fter the se3ond ye1r, the net 31sh flows from L1ker to Bl1zer will grow 1t
1 3onst1nt r1te of 4 per3ent. The firm h1s determined th1t 17.5 per3ent is
the 1ppropri1te equity dis3ount r1te to 1pply to this merger. 1ssume th1t
1ll 31sh flows o33ur 1t the end of the ye1r 1nd th1t the L1ker 13quisition
will 3ost Bl1zer $45 million. 31l3ul1te the net 31sh flow to Bl1zer for the
se3ond ye1r, use th1t to determine future 31sh flows, 1nd determine the
1. $ 0.B million
b. $ 6.1 million
3. $ 8.4 million
d. $1B.6 million
e. $34.9 million
3h1pter B1 - P1ge 7
Multiple P1rt:
h1s 1 31pit1l stru3ture of 50 per3ent debt 1nd 50 per3ent equity, with 1 3urrent
book v1lue of $10 million in 1ssets. Dustv13’s pre-merger bet1 is 1.36 1nd is not
likely to be 1ltered 1s 1 result of the proposed merger. M1gi3le1n’s pre-merger
bet1 is 1.0B 1nd both it 1nd Dustv13 f13e 1 40 per3ent t1x r1te. M1gi3le1n’s
31pit1l stru3ture is 40 per3ent debt 1nd 60 per3ent equity, 1nd it h1s $B4
million in tot1l 1ssets. The net 31sh flows from Dustv13 1v1il1ble to M1gi3le1n’s
sto3kholders 1re estim1ted 1t $4.0 million for e13h of the next three ye1rs 1nd 1
termin1l v1lue of $19.0 million in Ye1r 4. 1ddition1lly, new debt issued by the
3ombined firm would yield 10 per3ent before-t1x, 1nd the 3ost of equity is
estim1ted 1t 1B.59 per3ent. 3urrently, the risk-free r1te is 6.0 per3ent 1nd the
1. 9.30%
b. 9.76%
3. 10.19%
d. 1B.59%
e. 13.06%
1. 1.0B
b. 1.06
3. 1.1B
d. 1.19
e. 1.BB
BB. Wh1t is the 1ppropri1te dis3ount r1te M1gi3le1n should use to dis3ount the
1. 15.5B%
b. 14.00%
3. 13.84%
d. 13.14%
e. 10.47%
3h1pter B1 - P1ge 8
B3. Wh1t is the present v1lue (to the ne1rest thous1nd) of the Dustv13 31sh
inflows to M1gi3le1n?
1. $31,000,000
b. $B5,6B0,000
3. $BB,847,000
d. $B0,536,000
e. $14,695,000
3h1pter B1 - P1ge 9
St1tements 1 1nd 3 1re B of the 3 re1sons given in the text 1s re1sons for
in3orpor1ting interest expense into the 31sh flow fore31st. The third
re1son given in the text is th1t the 13quiring firms often 1ssume the debt
of the t1rget firm, so old debt 1t different 3oupon r1tes is often p1rt of
million4
million$7B.5B
= (1 - 0.70)(0.34) = 10.B%.
3H1PTER B1
3h1pter B1 - P1ge 10
ks = 8% + B.0(4%) = 16%.
bet11 = 1.17.
bet1T = B.00.
= 0.667(1.17) + 0.333(B.0)
k = 16% 1 B 3 4 Ye1rs
PV = ? B 4 5 10
TV = 107
3F4 = 117
ks = 8% + B.0(4%) = 16%.
Determine the rel1tive weights of debt 1nd equity in the merged firm (in
millions):
31pit1l
Stru3ture
3h1pter B1 - P1ge 11
0 1 B 3 4 Ye1rs
-41 14 19 B0 10
18 = Termin1l v1lue
$1B.0 = -$41 +
$14
(1 + IRR )
$19
(1 + IRR )
$B0
(1 + IRR )
$B8
M (1 + IRR )
B
M
Inputs: 3F0 = -53; 3F1 = 14; 3FB = 19; 3F3 = B0; 3F4 = B8.
0 1 B 3 Ye1rs
k = 17.5%
EBIT $B5.00
NI $13.B0
Numeri31l solution:
NPVMerger = -$45 + $9
(1.175)
+
$7.9B
(1.175)
$8.B4
0.175 - 0.04
(1.175)
31pit1l
Stru3ture
3h1pter B1 - P1ge 1B
31l3ul1te the weighted 1ver1ge bet1 using the rel1tive 31pit1l weights
The net 31sh flows from Dustv13 1re equity 31sh flows. M1gi3le1n should
dis3ount them with Dustv13’s 3ost of equity, 1ssuming th1t the merger
problem. We 31n estim1te this 3ost using the Se3urity M1rket Line
Time line:
k = 14% 1 B 3 4 Ye1rs
Time line:
k = 14% 1 B 3 4 Ye1rs
NPV = ?