You are on page 1of 2

The organization's approach to assessing health and safety risks is

outlined below:

 The newly appointed facility managers were nominated by the MD


and directors to examine health and safety responsibilities also,
which is a fine idea, but he was unqualified and inexperienced and
not trained for the above-mentioned task.
 Workers were put in a stressful situation by being asked to
complete additional targets in less time by the line managers,
which is a health and safety concern in and of itself, and the
organization's response was inadequate.
 Workers/salespeople’s were not educated regarding reporting
system to notify any workplace hazards or accidents, which shows
there was no culture of reporting of any problem within the
organization.
 The director did not participate in the audit, which does not shows
appreciative attitude on their part towards workers health and
safety.
 No induction training provided to the newly appointed young
trainees.
 The organization didn't even provide health and safety training to
their employees.
 The risk assessment was not out dated but also general in nature,
indicating that the organization took a poor strategy.
 The organization's senior level staff (directors) did not consider
health and safety risk assessment to be one of their responsibilities.
 The directors questioned the need for risk assessment, claiming
that the firm does not require it because employees are simply
seated at desks which indicate that directors were not having
enough knowledge of risks associated with the work activities
within the organization.
 There was no suitable documentation mechanism in place to record
any incident.
 Even filing a compensation claim was not a problem for them
indicating that the organization took a poor strategy towards health
and safety.

You might also like