Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Culture & Agriculture Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 135–137. ISSN 1048-4876, eISSN 1556-486X. © 2006 by the American Anthropological Association. All
rights reserved. Permission to photocopy or reproduce article content via University of California Press Journals, www.ucpressjournals.com.
a specific point in time” (p. 39). Recognition of bound- preservation. Combining ecology and culture is a diffi-
ary constraints only develops the need to secure a pre- cult task in a continuously shifting society, but “land-
cise definition for ecological restoration. Chapter 3 scape change is about the intertwining of ecological and
addresses the various definitions offered by several cultural processes—not just material processes, but also
restorationists as well as an effort, by Higgs, to clarify out changing mindsets” (p. 179–180). Unfortunately for
the difference between restoration ecology and ecolog- restorationists social changes occur very quickly.
ical restoration. Higgs then delves deeper into whether Each day a new technology keeps people indoors and
ecological restoration should include other forms of unaware.
environmental management. In this section he takes a The pace at which social changes occur will affect
look at the central concepts that best comprise suc- the way we view what is important to environmental
cessful restoration and reveals the underlying themes restoration and preservation. In fact, restorationists
of ecological integrity and historical fidelity. Ecological face a paradoxical situation. Ecological restoration is
integrity is, “an ecosystems ability to maintain its or- meant to improve and restore landscapes that have
ganization” (p. 122). It can manage to adapt to the been damaged by human use or misuse. Technological
changing environment. For restoration to be viewed as developments have played are large role in environ-
successful, each project should maintain some level of mental degradation and now restorationists would
integrity. This concept is used to determine the success like to use technology to help restore it. Higgs intro-
of an ecosystem. However, the concept of historical fi- duces two approaches the first being technological
delity is applied to the project goals. Together, “a restora- restoration and the second, focal restoration.
tion project is defined by its location along two scales, Technological restoration “is connected to patterns of
ecological integrity and historical fidelity” (p. 127). The technological culture,” and focal restoration “is shaped
delicate balance between integrity and fidelity help to by engaged relationships between people and ecosys-
comprise one portion of what ecological restoration is tems” (p. 186). The negative side to ecosystem restora-
about. Within the concept of historical fidelity, Higgs tion is that nature can become a commodity. Viewed as
argues three principle components: (1) structural and a business, restored nature can become processed and
compositional replication, (2) functional success, and efficient, bought and sold. Restoration also implies
(3) durability. that ecosystems and wildernesses can be rebuilt and
The first area of structural and compositional repli- any concern for environmental preservation will dimin-
cation “must strongly resemble the structure and com- ish. A concern for restoration is that there is “a slow,
position of an appropriate reference ecosystem. inexorable drift in society, whether through themed
Functional success is dependent on management and is hotels that purport to mirror wilderness or technolog-
considered to be tied to structural/compositional repli- ically dependent leisure activities to convert every-
cation,” and finally, “durability, the key for restoration thing of value into something that can be bought or
success” (p. 128). Durability is important because an sold” (p. 180). Focal restoration is used to connect people
ecosystem must survive over time. Higgs suggests that with their environment minimize the themed vision of
the three components that comprise historical fidelity our environment.
are a few determinants for restoration success. In the final chapter Higgs addresses the topic of
He continues with historical fidelity in chapter 4. design. He suggests that design is a way to connect the
Here he discusses the importance of history, or his- past to the future. As with any concept problems will
toricity, in designing and management of a restored surface. Design is art. It reflects the interests of people.
ecosystem. Problems that restorationists will encounter Design within restoration is supposed to reflect the in-
with historical fidelity are, “incompleteness of refer- terest of the ecosystem developing awareness and con-
ence information, uncertainty and industrial rates of cern for the surrounding environment, however there
change” (p. 176). The first of the three problems is the is the possibility that it will reflect the interest of peo-
decaying historical data followed by the uncertainty of ple. This leads to the second problem. The concern
the future and finally the industrial rates of change, with design is that it becomes characteristic of “tech-
which holds no knowledge about future environmental nological culture rather than as a critical response to
conditions and will affect the integrity of an ecosystem. technology” (p. 280). By focusing on the needs of the
Historicity is important in restoration because it will environment over the needs of people design can help
develop a nostalgic awareness of nature and encourage make restoration successful.