Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Petition

    Uploaded by

    Sheena C.
    12 views34 pages

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    12 views34 pages

    Petition

    Uploaded by

    Sheena C.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 34
    eS i} Republic of the Philippines Se National Capital Judicial Region REGIONAL TRIAL COURT Quezon City Branch __ IN THE MATTER OF JUDICIAL RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN DECREE OF DIVORCE BETWEEN AKIHIRO TAMURA AND MARITES MAALA ESMERALDA, Petitioner, -versus- SP. Proc. No. LOCAL CIVIL REGISTRY OF — For: Judicial Recognition of QUEZON — CITY, —CIVIL_—_—Foreign Decree of Divorce REGISTRAR GENERAL, PHILIPPINE STATISTICS AUTHORITY (PSA), OFFICE OF ‘THE SOLICITOR GENERAL, and all other persons having interest in this Petition, Respondents. PETITION Petitioner, MARITES MAALA ESMERALDA, by counsel, respectfully states that: ‘THE PARTIES 1. Petitioner MARITES MAALA ESMERALDA (“Petitioner Marites” for brevity) is a Filipino, of legal age, and a resident of 018 General de Dios Extension, Bakas Compound, Barangay Bagong Silangan, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines. Petitioner may be 1 served with orders, notices and other processes of the Honorable Court through the undersigned counsel at the address given below. 2. Public Respondent CIVIL REGISTRAR GENERAL - PHILIPPINE STATISTICS AUTHORITY ("Respondent PSA” for brevity) is impleaded as a nominal party, being the officer charged with the registration of acts, events and judicial decrees and decisions concerning the civil status of persons. Respondent may be served with summons, orders and other processes of the Honorable Court at PSA ‘Complex, East Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City. 3. Public Respondent LOCAL CIVIL REGISTRY OF QUEZON CITY ("Respondent Local Civil Registry” for brevity), through its Civil Registrar, is being impleaded as a nominal party, for being the repository of records concerning marriage and other legal instrument affecting the civil status of a person within Quezon City. It may be served with summons, notices, and other legal processes of this, Honorable Court at its office in Civic Center Building C, Quezon City Hall Compound, Mayaman St,, corner East Avenue, Quezon City. FACTUAL ANTECEDENTS 4. Sometime in 2015, Petitioner caught the eye of Akihiro ‘Tamura (“Tamura” for brevity), a Japanese National, in a popular online social networking site, Facebook 5. After getting to know each other, Petitioner and Tamura became a couple. Eventually, the two decided to contract marriage. 6. Thus, on 16 September 2016, Petitioner and Tamura contracted their marriage before the solemnizing officer Rev. Jay Arvie M. Pangilinan. The marriage was solemnized at Savory Restaurant, Ever Gotesco, Commonwealth, Quezon City. ‘The aforesaid fact of marriage is evidenced by their Certificate of Marriage hereto attached as Annex “A”. 7. Worth noting that the marriage celebrated in Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines is valid under the Japanese Law. Further, at the time of marriage, the Petitioner was and remains a Filipino citizen 2 While Tamura was and remains a Japanese national. A copy of Petitioner's passport proving Petitioner was and remains a Filipino citizen is hereto attached as Annex “B”. 8. Thereafter, Petitioner and Tamura moved to Japan and they never begot any child. 9. During their marriage, Petitioner and Tamura’s, relationship was filled with mutual love, respect and commitment for each other. However, after sometime in their marriage, the relationship of Petitioner and Tamura tumed sour. Their marriage was besieged with several disagreements and quarrel that can be attributed to inability of the Petitioner and Tamura to reconcile due to parties’ cultural differences. 10. ‘Thus, after almost four (4) years into marriage, Petitioner and Tamura decided to obtain a divorce by mutual agreement under the Japanese Law. Copies of the excerpt of the Civil Code of Japan and its English translation published in the Japanese database system of the Ministry of Justice of Japan are hereto attached as Amexes “C", and “C-1", respectively. 11, Petitioner confirmed the status of their marriage by obtaining copies of the Certificate of Acceptance of Divorce of Tamura and Petitioner and the Family Registry of Tamura, 12. The Certificate of Acceptance of Tamura and Petitioner states the fact of acceptance of the divorce by the Mayor of Yokkaichishi Mie- ken, Japan. The certified true copies of the Certificate of Acceptance of Divorce of Akihiro Tamura and Marites Maala Esmeralda and its English translation are hereto attached as Annexes “D”, and “D-1”, respectively. 13. Likewise, Tamura’s Family Registry shows that the divorce between Petitioner and Tamura has been officially recorded and registered as evidenced by the Certificate of Entire Contents issued by the Mayor of Yokkaichi-shi Mie-ken, Japan. The certified true copies of the Family Register of Akihiro Tamura and its English translation are hereto attached as Annexes “E”, and “E- 1”, respectively. 14. Worth noting that the aforesaid copies of the Certificate of Acceptance of Divorce of Akihiro Tamura and Marites Mala Esmeralda and its English translation, the Family Registry of Akihiro Tamura and. its English translation, and the excerpt of the Civil Code of Japan and its English translation published in the Japanese Law Translation Database System of the Ministry of Justice of Japan are officially authenticated evidenced by a certification from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Tokyo, Japan). Copies of the apostille certification by Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Tokyo, Japan), Notarial Certificate, and Declaration are hereto attached as Annexes “P’, “F-1” and “F-2", respectively. 15. _Itis worth emphasizing that the second paragraph of Article 26 of the Family Code recognize the dissolution of the marriage between the Filipino spouse and his or her alien spouse and hence, allows the Filipino citizen who has been divorced by his or her foreign spouse to remarry as well, thus: “Art. 26. All marriages solemnized outside the Philippines, in accordance with the laws in force in the country where they were solemnized, and valid there as such, shall also be valid in this country, except those prohibited under Articles 35 (1), (4), (6) and (6), 3637 and 38. Where _a_marri ino citizen _and a foreigner is validly celebrated and a divorce is thereafter validly obtained abroad by the alien spouse capacital him or her to remarry, the Filipino spouse shall_have capacity {o remarry under Philippine jaw.” 16. In Republic v. Manalo', the Supreme Court explained that the purpose of the second paragraph of Article 26 of the Family Code is to avoid the absurd situation where the Filipino spouse remains married to the alien spouse who, after a foreign divorce decree that is effective in the country where it was rendered, is no longer married to the Filipino spouse. Thus: “The provision is a corrective measure to address an anomaly where the Filipino spouse is tied to the marriage while the foreign spouse is free to marry under the laws of his or her country. Whether the Filipino spouse initiated the foreign divorce proceeding or not, a favorable decree dissolving the marriage bond and capacitating his or her lien spouse to remarry will have the same result: the ipino spouse will effectively be without a husband or wife. A Filipino who initiated a foreign divorce proceeding is in the same place and in like circumstance as a Filipino who is at the receiving end of an alien initiated proceeding, Therefore, the subject provision should not make a distinction. In both instance, it is extended as a means to recognize the residual effect of the foreign divorce decree on Filipinos whose marital ties to their alien spouses are severed by operation of the latter's national law: 17. Likewise, Article 412 of the Civil Code in relation to Section 2 of Rule 108 of the Rules of Court provides for a special remedial proceeding by which entries in the civil registry relating to “marriages,” may be judicially cancelled or corrected and subsequently, the aforesaid judgment authorizing the cancellation or correction be annotated in the marriage of certificate. 18. Considering the foregoing, Petitioner is filing the present Petition for the recognition of her divorce decree, the corresponding ‘entries as to the civil status of Petitioner be cancelled or corrected, and such recognition be annotated in Petitioner's cert te of marriage. NR Na 22109, Apel 26 2018 a, Na. 249722 January 2,220) cx of Calapan», Republic GR EXHIBITS AND WITNESSES 19. Petitioner intends to mark the Annexes attached to this Petition as its exhibits. 20. Petitioner likewise intends to present MARITES MAALA. ESMERALDA, herein Petitioner, as witness in the course of trial. The Purpose of her testimony is to prove the allegations of this Petition, among others. A copy of her Judicial Affidavit is hereto attached as Annex “G”. 21. Petitioner hereby respectfully reserves its right to submit testimony of additional witnesses and other pieces of evidence that may become material during the course of proceedings. PRAYER WHEREFORE, premises considered, itis respectfully prayed that, after notice and hearing, judgment be rendered as follows: 1. Reco; izing the divorce obtained by Petitioner and Tamura, which ‘was validly decreed in Japan thus dissolving their marriage, to be likewise valid and effective in the Philippine jurisdiction; 2. Declaring Petitioner's marriage to Tamura as dissolved with a pronouncement that Petitioner shall have the capacity to remarry ‘under Philippine law; 3. Ordering Respondent Honorable Civil Registrar General ~ Philippine Statistics Authority and Local Civil Registrar of Quezon City to cancel or correct the entries of marriage of Petitioner and ‘Tamura recorded in the Office of the Local Civil Registry of Quezon City; 4, Ordering Respondent Honorable Civil Registrar General — Philippine Statistics Authority, the Local Civil Registrar of Quezon City, and other concerned Philippine government offices to annotate the Japan divorce decree on the Certificate of Marriage of Petitioner; and 5. Ordering Respondent Honorable Civil Registrar General ~ Philippine Statistics Authority, the Local Civil Registrar of Quezon City, and other concerned Philippine government offices to register and record the judgment (recognizing the Japan divorce decree) of the Honorable ‘Court on this Petition Other reliefs that the Fionorabie Court may deem just and equitable ‘under the premises are likewise prayed for. ‘Quezon City for Quezon City, 2021. KRISTI (CE D. PADUA Counsel for the Petitioner 204 Floor, MC Rillo Building, E. Rodriquez Sr. Avenue, Barangay Mariana, Quezon City, Metro Manila Email: kjoycepaduaégmail.com Tel. No (02) 805 8361/ 09051537614 Roll of Attorneys No. 71003 IBP No. 151474/15-01-2021/Isabela PTR No, 0595713/07-01-2021/Quezon City CC No, 25477410/ 02-04-2021; Quezon City MCLE Comp. No. VI-DU20854/14-09-2022 E. Rodriquez Sr. Avenue, Barangay Mariana, Quezon City, Metro Manila Email: smvconservado@gmail.com Tel. No: (02) 805 8361/ 09157214447 Roll of Attorneys No. 75635 IBY No. 1429/9/ U1-U/-2021/ Cavite PTR No. 7235134/ 01-07-2021/ Pasig City ‘CTC No, 06864384/ 01-07-2021/ Pasig City Board Admitted as Member of the Philippine Bar un 29 July 2020 VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION AGAINST NON-FORUM SHOPPING 1, MARITES MAALA ESMERALDA, is a Filipino, of legal age, and a resident of General de Dios Extension, Bakas Compound, Barangay Bagong Silangan, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines, after being sworn to in accordance with law, hereby depose and state: 1 Lam the Petitioner in the above-captioned case. . Ihave caused the preparation of the foregoing Petition. I have read and understood the foregoing pleading and that the allegations in it are true and correct based on my own personal Knowledge and authentic documents and it is not filed to harass, cause unnecessary delay, nor needlessly increase the cost of litigation. 4, The factual allegations made therein have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for discovery. 5. Thereby certify that I have not commenced any other action or filed any claim involving the same issues in any court, tribunal or quasi- judicial agency and, to the best of my knowledge, no such other action or claim is pending therein. 6. If should learn thereafter that a similar action or proceeding has been. filed or is pending, I hereby undertake to report that fact within (5) calendar days therefrom to the court or agency where the original pleading and sworn certification contemplated herein have been filed. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my signature this fo eae Betas cuts Affiant SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this exhibiting to me his/her until affiant with. validity Doc No.__; Page No.__; Book No. __; Series of 2021 ANNEX “A” Le FRO IO Lia Whew 4 fovea RRL pr, Mn 5008 ae 7 ad Terme ANNEX “B” OF THE PHIUPPINES EE ‘pesTerise, Sas REPUBLIKA NG PRUFINAS | wMUBLC ‘ein a0et Bin 05h ‘ THORRICMME | () Won cle pares has orion W way do mistaken +seRmAVes. erty orate case FSR HMMOMEELEDE ES. EEL. | Ue putes do mot igemticton of mare: rowed UAB LTS FARIS HALEN C | hme tale fet of marae shal nc be provered ey becouse natin was nol gen inthe fom pesibed In raga (oth 722. Cr) (Resclesion of Mariage) FLRGTSR MM. Remo REECE SCOMREL SIME ROME EBC ‘es HS arog may oe nel, ies pusont be rine lees 7447 nv. (Resclosion of Unie Mariage) RE TOMER AMM, BANE. LOM eT (1) Ete lo partes, tiles,» pbc troecdor may make 2 ean to ta fay cout 1 ed 8 PRAT, COMME ERIM FSCEBCRS, RIEL, MONT, ao PARCURGI, CEMRTSE EATER. arioge Te he potion of es 731 1 736 wc rode, howe, a pe poner ay rl i is er a deat en ce pats. 2 BERStANG LASTS ROMER URI OWT, SAORI IED Hb, LOMMLEMRT SLSR. Awan or pos spe of» pry» artage Bot kes po fA 732 Arce 733 may ft races ef mara. fom, FAMAAMERLLL EH, ZORA ‘Rescason of Mariage in Vilaton of Marigenbi (RaMOMMORNL) let WEERTER WEES ROMEIMRLE | Mice 15 (0) When @ pron of vevmaragete 39° exces mares pea. can recs fa marine Pa tts be pros tN 731 may mt be ae Lemeracemeean. 2 FAMTE, MCLE, TE=NAM LOMMORALEMRTSE EH TES. REL SOCELRREMBE LEE, COMDTE @) A pawn of evmarapeatie age may resin ot tariage win after res mets ser balhe bas ached argu ape; proved tt his ha ot apy Dale hae Koma, OMA L CAMB LORD SABA EBS L, LAMAR RE EE. ZO AUHLEMRT SIESTA. ww raed he mariage te machin marion 58 ‘cision of Mariage Formed within the Period of CMR AERATPSTC LMAO RG L) a 4 SERRA WERT SOME | Mahan rin nytt nat rma bt vt te over of Arle 730k mans have peed fem he day on whch te pres mariage was canceled or reader 1a wean has conceived ach firremarig® REG ES HHLORML) (Rescssion of Mariage by Fraud or Duress) Emme MATRA ESTHET B12, LOMMORML ERIRNTERRT SE ewes. 2 WmlOMe ESR. SUE, IIE ROL, SLSHMMERNEREMN EEL. RMME LEE SM. MTS. hie 747 (8) K poson who bas marie doe 10 fd oF dens may ake a cin fe escsion of mariage toe fay ont 2) Theckim oreeson f marge pursuant the preeing paaraphapes wpe hepsi oltre mont afer be pty us cord the tad or escaped the dust, oF Upon aon (ORAL OBA) (Gilet of Rescission of Mariage) TERRA MMORIALIR, ARI MPOT DRLOMHEETE. ‘hice TE (\) Reeenln of marioge shal so ie toate ofa 2 MRONEEWTEORMLOMBED SSE eibteh oR SM, MMIC L TREE Lei, MICMBELYTHSMMICBHT, ZO (@) A pry wh di ct ow lhe case of escsson a he fine of mariage must wu poet cane by he mariage he eet he gan lh uly cts ae LEI RN, 7 MMOWEBYTLORMLOMDIDHS EE pho THESE, Mille ko THEMED A pety wo es avr le come scone cd marge ma ona oe ge tins by he mare. is can, he pay Hable compere an ater PY WROBEL NAB, BEA heh GREE APAURET, BATES HERE TTAB, =H. BEEBLAMUTRORY, COMAEBOT. PANT ORE GI, CHCA L CONE | Wetted domes RTS REER I. (eMOMZORA, Taal Motandle of DWvorce Provisions) “cH Tha prs of ago (1) ot ie 728, ices 76 76 rch, be pon pra (1) MC 790, npn A) 6) od Hc B19 al OROWAMOMEE MOKA LCDR | miata he mcssonct maar ii BB MeOwA Section 2 fect of Mariage (OR) {Surname of Husband and Wie) ‘a Te ater wd we sa ap be sure of he WERETe Aan, MMOMIEEDSECSE RY, ALEHORERTS. tad cw in sexrtnes wh at wich i ecied at Sees, (ete OMEA) {Surviving Spouse Reverting o Previous Sumame te) BERET —& RMO—BBRC URES. © RRS ORMORKATSS LETTS. "hin Tat (i) Waa rw ds, Be sng spouse nay rata sg be sare ee wed blo marine, 2 BERATAROMER, UAROBtET EB AOWE DO TRATS. (2) Th pros of Arle 76 shal py mas mutans © the preceding prep and th case feed on parrot tot 78. (AE, eARVEIORB) (Duty to Live Together, Cooperate, and Provide Mutual Assistance) REREASR RMAC. EVA LEMD | Arce TSA husband en wl salve geber and prove Lainie bth ul eomperton an asian. (me ESRD (Constructive Adult by Mariage) BERETER ARRIMME REGIE, © | Mice 759 (a minor ever ino mariage, hate stl be Hick oTRERBLRLOLAET. none have and malty [— cdamomonmi (Right to Rescind Contract between Husband and Wit) CER HOR RMOTCL RI, Wee. 2th, RMO-HbSoDEBIATT LICE (ie TA ler be we ay ay te mariage ced a cata! etme bard wd we pote, 3. REL, MEROMME MT SE Lit :20. | hoes ha tis may ett he pt =e ae, Seaton Imaal Property i wh Gabeecton 1 General Provisions (RAO RE TREE) ‘Marital Property of Husband and Ws) FERRER AMG, MMOMAME. TOM LOW TIRORNE Linh oh eet, LOM AM, KRDSLEBELS. ‘aa TS Toe pry sds oer wl that bo prscted by he long ster, nest Pay eo a corte stg oth ober, gang er peel hing retin be marion GaaTEENORIN) ‘Requirements of Perfection of Contract on Property of Husband and Wie) BERETAR AMPRRMRMERESREE Lacan, MmomETKeoMRE Linh HE, CRERMORMAROBSAHRT SEE sree, Tee Ta aban ow ave eed a 8 act that opts tone ary pope yan, cok ey kb acted apa bw senor ete hsb or ie, o 8 it pay ess istered por 1 beaten of marine, RoRT ee we ‘Arle 757 Deleted (Citations on Altering Property Rights of Husband (AMOMERAOSEOMRE) nea) BEREPNE MORRO, MOEEHI | AAG0 758) Toe propery eso attend nd we may i REveceuTeRh. rotted ate rotiaton fangs 2 AMO—H2, HO-KONREEAT SED Swe, REET RELL TION ERS CLRLEL, MOM, LOND @) be case wher on pay Wo @ maringe etnies pay a that papery pad by misdmitafen, te ier pty may aka 8 ci the font coat er Ns oun eraceenmammicenaer scence, | environ tape F RAWRESWCH, BOMREE GE. €]() A cm may be mde nd pap OnmemRraceeees. coment pte wh bec ee nt pig paragraph. ixotanommusamaosmn |, Cumiromens of Perecion of Change othe ; Adit f Property or ivision of Propet in Co-nership) ARTA WAOMEREM AHO AONE, MALORNE RHL, iB AMmOnMELRL Bt, LOOM Lite. PLeMeone AoeSaihitr see Hs ‘ie 759 atria of propery ba bee cargo Property hel in coomertip has been Sit part 1 rons fe precadng Acie or a wrest of te contact let he 5, may ra set ga | successor in he ft hard rw, ra pay ens 4S J} — eine = Teoh ee Sk ween Subsection? Stattory Maal Property System™ _ aes ROR Ring dia BO) HEEATR AM Eon, RA EOR=a [sim TA wo om wT) OWE SLT. MMi SET ERNE ATS. ste ton te marge tag iro ant er POPS income, sei alber cere Tibi for Debi inure oF (auowecnyemmoupat)\s | 20ntis hose eek CTE Toran arta 9 WEnAt-R AMO-FHARORBEMLT LOIRTAE LEE BR, MO—TIE. SH [ek oTECEMBICODT, MALT EORUEE AS. REL. BEREHUMERR DEON EF reprieg evi rast mater, 8 oer PY habe ity ar seca ate for dst ane fom Pa 0 prt ti sh ot apy range DBs pany ofc ut ce pay we asa EY BL AMG, CORY TRU MBC BF SH AO) BRAT & AMO HsMORNNTD BAT ERE RoMMMTeOm cAMeMM, TORAMA (ebb —HtsMAH CTT SANBEV 9) EFS ‘Pamerip of Property between Husband and Wie) “ae 72 (1) Proper anned y one party bere marae ted peoey oie ne nae oat pty eg Marae ‘alle separate propery (ppery owned sng by ene Fay wamaroge 2 RMOVTRERT SPM EH TEUIETE, (@)Propety tat dos vot Cary belong fo eter husband ZOKMMESLOLMIETE. ie shale pases be alin co-onantp suet ENE Section 4 Divorce 5% BROMO Subsection 1 Divorce by Agreement em Lomid) (Gives by Agreement) BEARER Kitts, COME, METS [Mee Ahabendot te ney corey apeenes cEsees. BHAT WSK, WS ROOM EROM EE, Kap ie ao CATS. Mean (BO nOR A [_ititomieomigy | ppeaton tats Mua of ariogs Provo) | ‘cla TEA Tow pov of Aces 738,72, and 747 sat {ats sed oy apr pen a eel ec | BLHATER MOM, ZONE SU TAR oi AMMO ME BO MMMM HOmEEOROR HON: ibe CLERC, BMT SC LH Tat, ‘Acceptance of Notification of Divorce) Tide 765 (1) Netconf coca may ret be sco res th 6voca has bon fond voto wee pron ragegh (2) of Arce 739 apied mate mands © trensg Ace, pr) frie B18 a owns any ote ans retin. 2 AiO mIiRONeCRR Tame ERTHOTL, MME, EORBEZOMNEHH ‘aap espe 2) ratfeatan ot rere has been paragon act Wrote, (RRO TOES 5 HHOLE) ‘Determination of Matar regarding Custody of CN ater Divorce et.) WEAATAR ROHN LOMMETSES He, PORMET AEN, RLRBETLOMAR PEOMORM, FOKMICRTSRMORNEO RO POMC CERAM, LOMA 23. COMMPBUT FONE EBEL CELE GRD. “pla TEU parents rare by aoa he mates of vio wt have cstady over a hl, van and oer cots ean te fer or moe eit for cst fh cid ant any ber cesar mars tearing easy oer ta cid etal bo din Ba Aeyenent is cae, te css sab costed thn ighest rt. P WaOwaRMbEOES, LABRET SE Lees A Ue SN, RARE, INTO NTE RDS. 72) ayeonent sth into preceding paragranh hasnt nen mate, of canal be made, be mates sot fr in fhe receding pargragh sal be dete y the family cout 3 RERAMTE, DHUBSEBDSE SE. SmOMECL SED ELL, TOMFOEBE DUTHIL OTS CENTRE. "@)_The fy court may change tbe agree er eteinafon ander te provision of te preceding to paragraphs and oder any aber pope pasion regaréng custody oer he cil, Sind is ecassay. 7 WSROMEEE STR. KMORMATE, 2ROMAMBIKHEE LE, (@) The iis an ules of pans beyond te scape of esta nay ct be alred by te provisions of the preceding tee sages. (ite HE) [Reversion to Previous Surmame by Divorce) ERAT ER WHE 9 TREMOR ALE 1 Mik OME £9 THOM FEICALY 3 “ate TET (1) The surane ofa husband or wile who as taken a now rame by mariage shal revert ote suname uses belremartone by hore by apeenent 2 WOME EO MMORICML Ee 2, MMO ED =O AIC PMO IEE & ALONE LICL T, MMomic LC URRERTS Cea TRS, ce eee ee ee (2) A husband or wile whose sumame has revered 10 te sneer paragraph may wee surane hele wed a be ire ct Se | by ratiaten pw Be Fenty Reps ht wie Bree ont feet dre =e (Sette sy #5) BRAT BR LONE LRRD Id. eeeH cho semers ceases (Distribution of Property) "hie Tf) One pay oa ree by ageament may ‘dition ol pope tome tt Py | 2 HORE A SMOR CNT. MCRD AN ee, winner Se EAC SWE SI, SN, ACINNUMCH LCI Efe oueMRT SE ewes. REL. A Momo eewLRE TE, COMIN. BW he pas nd or crt, ste on ayeenet 6 | wo yar tm he day OR 3 ARON, ARNO. NERA ZOWNEL THM HOME DE -IO WANE SLT, DEERE SENET PMOA IO RCRD S. yb aera wine pea PAN BMY tout sat daomine whebar to mato 2 derbi, nd our ant mati of ta dst, tating io ach amour of propery ottaed tough fe cooperatan of Pa cies and lobe crmstaoes “Rasumption of Rights upon Reversion Previous (86 ic SAR OMORAO RM fees hracdl “pia TH (Da haband or wl who has taken new BEER TAR GAMER CREMORARIL BARTER ROMA RA LEE. 1 LONMELEE SH, SHAZOMOMMEAO Make, ZOMME RTE HERE sumane by marge dhoras by agreement air reir the tte conned in paragraph (1) of Ail B57, eat of wo vil be te svcasar of hase ets sal be deteined by creat paris a ay teint persons, Bau. 2 HORA EVES, LRET SS EASIER, MOMMA ERAT ATA 72) ie aresent of pest paragraph re orcanct be, made, te family cout stab dterine who wil be sucrstoraf he ritsin et paragoh suena 5. Bak RALORG ‘Subsection 2 Judicial Divorce @nLoe® (Wuslicial Bvoree) WETETR AMO Wid, RCT SMGTHE 5, NOR RHI SS LATE. “ate 770 (i) Only in he cases sated nthe folowing tes ayer band or wl su for chore: = RM IUE TABS ELE. a youe ha one an act of hasty —— RNAHSRRTMREHE LE, (i) abandoned bya see basa wl RNAOLES= I LGD ROE, (i) is ro clear wheter a pases dead or ae orate |e OMRON MORE BRE R, a & S| E LOMGMERRLM MRA MIASSE than ve ears: (a spose etarg fon sever met ess adhere Isnoprepet oreo ot (Whereis any te grave case mating it cto cone emer 2 RA, Be SME CMTS WUBSWATHOTL, —MOwNEAMLT GMOMEHN Lies Lat, REOMREM ars ts a cimonies 08 se (@) Acura is mariage reasonable tang no acu the can wher er a cased in fers HFSCEHTES, the pecan paar (ak LoMIOREORM) ‘popleaion Wai Wetanas of Divorce groement Provisions) WEEET—R WEEATARDDBEEATL KETONE, RA LOMBCOW TONES. ee em be Ot Codec pon ise snp spins Tote Sent 4 “cam TT rns of ies 76 TD ce a | py mands oe case of ied SS _—_——= yo stn ok 8 by ANNEX “D” 2 gen F fe ats | MOB ; we, mise | 402438308 C%® > aman moms 1468248 * Serene. 7277 (aA) (# > noag om 992811168 <1 i > sgn j0ukd GENEL Dae ee if ‘ > anne | ae | om aan - = = x Led AEH OTT “gow 90238308 SALE IL ERAT SS 9nse4A228 = ANNEX “D-1” CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE WOTIFCATION | NOTIFICATION OF DIVORCE DATE OF NOTIFICATION | March 30, 2020 | ARN Sie ee ere TWARITES MARIA ESHERALDA (oti) ee aoa Prpes {thon cna) Ores mi nent ‘SUMMARY OF THE u orm “sna o00151 “pists cent hat he eto sad above was sxe on Mach 0,220 pon, 2021 Mayor cf Yoshi Meken Tomah Mot_(sealed) i tag or 6 ANNEX “E” Qoufs #1 AH Foam OO Hs A 2.7 BH we (a) we [eeeng) mts 168246 (2) Bator (8) sRame (oem twa) mos 146248 (wee) mao rs TBiie] mos 1861298 oma wm 81178 te meg Tm 2 7% Bit dist. taiser Pe 1818238 [emgial 02208, VIL (meow) 74) EY Emaoeenal mm1974567 (amie) FRI SeOASE [emgica) o2209-, IY [emeomml 74) ey, [Beesi nal FR] BE6R23E (ga) S508 una) Fm25*2A68 (ee OEE) BU NI IDI, THEO ART [mle FORM) 749 ey lfetReoesn a) G20 10%2A1 98 [EMC RFOBORE) 77 YANN, Fe OY (eommMen) Fa25%70118 [F082] BHWBI 327 (FomeR) SRE Meer 2 7 (ema) #m2 6201 48 ajeinma) FR? 6471108 ALR FOES) ORR (ack Fora) [akeaneMMe2 7 BARE HET o1isT004 BE (0%)|—Ceicate of Ene Contents pemanent Doce Revlon ol ani reser ee tr le any Reiter. 77 Matsubara-cho Yokkaichi-shi Mie-ten Date of evon; Janay 17, 2006 Persons Registered in the fay Nave: ARH Dt otic: Je 24,176 Faber Kanio Tarra Meer Teso Tema Relationship Second 800 (ontensofStas statment of rach ai Aesegeen ith emt of ratory ed Aetnntegenent oti De ih: ie 24,1578 Pe ofbih: bach Mon | Dato of tation: ne 29,1976 | man: aber Dale of etabsen of bench fy Jamty vs ony gi: 27 ebaco voiahia Noten Kanto Tra ‘Date of mariage : January 23,2006 ane tp Res Rae Met [Nationality of spouse : Philippines: ‘Date of birth of spouse : June 11, 1974 Da che ne 6,208 ane ose: Re Roe Melgar Nanay of pase: Pilpies ie when vad eben ws ese Joe 23,2008 Pen wo azo te ean: Mayr of Kos Aten rl of enone i Feb 62013 ane felled: Ai Jnr Can Tarra Nationality of acknowledged child: Phifppines Dit of iho snowed ct: Feb 18,2010 Name of aha of cknoweped chit: Charon Juan Cabal re faction of ary fei ay 1, 2073 Name fhe Junior Tera ew panna onic of 6:2 March oa een rt oregon Febuary 6, 2014 ‘Dat of ctnawedgeent befor bit dy 10,2014 ae ttc ue Tarra Fant eel acho i: uanaancavsasoriieen ATs | ssn he. FSR BVO OODONNSE- YAN en Next page os, snseobic 5 ANNEX“F” 2 Lia IEAKIMRY 94» K (OKUBO CZIERASAD CASTRO) It. IEA AHI ACSW CHEB BA EL kot, ChewETS. omse GR 4 I Bet ESE US ita! “SAMA SAKUMA| ie ‘Kunio a ERULE, KALB RRRAEAORLEMBEY LOTHD. HO. TOMBE. HEOGOCHSLE CENTS. gase 6G 8 ean wack ene neee SMA Kall EH} ‘APOSTILLE {Convention de La Haye dS octobre 1961) 1. Contry: JAPAN “Tis pubic docment 2, hasbeen siemed by SAKUMA Kunio 5: sein the apc of Neary fhe Tokyo Leal Afar ures 4 bearathewal/stampof SAKUMA Kunio, Notary Certied 5. atTolyo 6 JUN. 4.2021 1. by the Ministry of Foreien Airs 8 2-N2025785 9. Seam: 10. Signature ( \ iior0 nia en } Forte Minister for Foreign AVIS ‘ ANNEX “F-2” DECLARATION |, Ceierasad Castro Okubo, do hereby and sincerely declare that the attached documents are; + The certified true copy ofthe Cerificate of Acceptance of Divorce of Akio Tamura and Marites Maala Esmeralda and its English Translation + The certified true copy of the Family Register of Akiiro Tamura and its English Translation + The excerpt ofthe Civil Code of Japan and its English translation a in the Jepanese Law Translation Database System of the Ministry Justice of Japan ‘And | make ths solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same tobe true and correct, Date: _2221.6-4 onseenm = 535 @ @ 1 A MARITES MAALA ESMERALDA it hot, AARAO BMT DEBOEREKR H@LEL, ct L dot, SNe wUETS 3% 9 N21 Ny KeEARME RET RK BQ GERMAITHIBIS KKB WK f oo. FENEIZB) si wy LRG, WOM MEEAORE MBE EOTH), 2, FOMME MKOFOCHSIEEMMTS om3% g gia Kae ome Ee APOSTILLE (Convention de La Haye du 5 octobre 1961) Country: JAPAN This public document 2 tusheensinedty EBATA Hironori 2: acting th cgcty f Nr ofthe Toyo Lgl Ars Buea 4, bearsthe seal/stampof FBATA Hironorl,Notary cers 5. at Tokyo 6 21SEP 2021 1. bythe Mir of Freen Aairs & 2-N2038863 9. Seal/stamp: 10, Signature HAMANOTO Hiroki For the Minister for Foreign Affairs Registered No. 939 NOTARIAL CERTIFICATE This is to certify that MARITES MAALA ESMERALDA swore before me, in accordance with legal procedure, that the statement in the attached documents 18 truthful, and she signed the document in my presence. Dated this 21 day of SEP. 2021 Nis, Li HIRONORI EBATA

    You might also like