Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ORG
CAIE IGCSE
HISTORY (0470)
SUMMARIZED NOTES ON THE SYLLABUS
CAIE IGCSE HISTORY (0470)
WWW.ZNOTES.ORG
CAIE IGCSE HISTORY (0470)
Clemenceau wanted harsh peace: a broken-up No: Too harsh, blamed the wrong people as Germany had
Germany and an
independent Rhineland and a new
democratic government (forming it was one of
disarmed German along with compensation.
He got conditions of peace
agreement), German economy
limited compensation and military restrictions, a crippled and people in near-starvation
state, Germans
unified
Germany and demilitarized Rhineland. He felt not fairly represented at the conference, ‘diktat’,
other
this was not harsh
enough, didn’t get independent countries were not blameless, expected treaty based on
Rhineland or control of Saarland, 14
points, war had devastating physical effects:
Wilson wanted a just peace based on 14 points: he did farmers were recruited in army>disruptive
not want
Germany blamed (article 231 & reparations) by 1918 only 50% milk production, 60% meat and
in TOV but they were. He
successfully established self- butter production
of pre-war levels
determination in Eastern Europe and
League of the potato supply run out 1916-1917 winter
Nations. Demilitarization was not achieved except by combined effects of hunger and disease kill ¾ million
force in Germany and TOV/LON ultimately not Germans
ratified. Yes: economic troubles were self-inflicted as other
Britain wanted a compromise peace; was happy that countries
raised taxes and practiced more Rigorous fiscal
German armed and
naval forces were restricted, policy to pay for
reparations (Britain had greater debt and
Lloyd received hero’s welcome,
although the spread paid off more than Germany
by introducing high taxes,
of communism still worrying him. too), Treaty of Brest-Litovsk was much
harsher – 32%
There were disagreements over self-determination & land, 34% population, 54% industry, 300 million gold
‘access to
sea’ clause, the harshness of the treaty and Ruble, nearly ¾ of its iron ore & half of its industry
LON (Wilson wanted
world parliament, Lloyd wanted to
get together in emergencies
only.) Clemenceau resented
1.5. Could the Treaties be justified at the
Wilson’s generosity wanted strong
League with army.
Clemenceau felt that Britain was happy to treat Germany time?
fairly
in Europe which threatened France yet were less
happy to treat
them fairly when it came to concessions of No: TOV led to rise of Hitler as army crippled = cruel,
colonies and military
which threatened Britain. genocidal regime, defeated nation’s disadvantage was
exploited so
vengeance was probable, treaty ignored it,
1.4. What was the impact of peace bound to fail. Some were
ineffective such as Treaty of
Sevres which were re-drawn after 3
years failed to
treaties on Germany up to 1923? maintain peace.
Yes: Mood of post-war urgency, state of near-starvation
Reactions: and
infrastructural ruin, public pressure to punish
defeated parties,
some people thought it was not harsh
Horror & outrage, war guilt clause was particularly hated enough, and that German
problems were self-inflicted by
Betrayed, blamed ‘November Criminals’, Jews, bad fiscal policy and Brest-Litovsk
hypocrisy.
Communists, Germans did
not feel that they had lost the
war as most of war went well for
Germany.
Angry because government not represented at Versailles 2. To What Extent was the
conference
(diktat).
German army limited but disarmament not practiced by League of Nations a Success?
other
countries.
Reparations pushed country deeper into state of near-
starvation,
feared it would cripple economy 2.1. How successful was the league in
Colonies taken double standards for self-determination: 1920s?
Germans
displaced, not allowed to rule themselves
Aims:
Impact:
Discourage aggression- seemed strong as it had both
New government had many enemies: Communists, means of
arbitration (tribunals) and means of influence
Nationalists, Army
Internal scapegoats - Jews, (collective
security). Aaland Islands, Upper Silesia,
Communists, November Criminals (‘Stab in
back theory’) Bulgaria, BUT Vilna,
Corfu, Ruhr Invasion
Political violence- Spartacists 1919, Kapp Putsch 1920, Encourage cooperation in business and trade- Locarno
Munich
Putsch, Ruhr Invasion 1923 (French killed 100 treaties=successful but had nothing to do with LON.
German workers and
expelled 100,000) Encouraged
economic recovery (Dawes plan), attempted
Economic problems &eventually, hyperinflation to strengthen league
failed (1924) BUT could not impede
Rise of Hitler- Hitler used unpopularity of TOV to his the Great Depression or reduce
its impact and was
advantage by
luring people to nationalist ideas of impaired permanently by it. Thereafter,
competition and
restoring homeland’s former
glory hostility in business and trade increased.
Disarmament-only German disarmed. Disarmament tried
Was it fair? to limit tonnage
of tanks, limit size of artillery, prohibit
WWW.ZNOTES.ORG
CAIE IGCSE HISTORY (0470)
WWW.ZNOTES.ORG
CAIE IGCSE HISTORY (0470)
Depression increased economic competition. Military Willingness to fight for his interest would
ultimately lead
provided
jobs and defense for colonies/markets. to war.
Depression led to
extremism in badly affected Role of other factors: his foreign policy was more
countries with few colonies like
Germany, Italy & gambling* than
planned; encouraged by appeasement
Japan (e.g. Rhineland 29
Czechoslovakia). Failure of the League
Britain and France were divided on the issue meant there was no
condemnation or collective security
Both disarmament and aggression curbing efforts failed to impede him. Treaty of
Versailles weaknesses exploited,
in the
1930s. and this discontent largely shaped
his foreign policy.
Expansionist intent not new to Germany- ‘greater
Germany’ vision resonated by Kaiser also- German
3. Why had International foreign policy’ and
aggressive nationalism in general to
blame for war, not just
Hitler’s nationalism.
Peace Collapsed by 1939?
*1960s view of British Historian AJP Taylor – Hitler; a logical
3.1. What were the long-term gambler
not planner
consequences of the peace treaties of
1919-1923? 3.4. Describe the events comprising
evidence of Hitler’s aggression
Made LON look less credible as it upheld a treaty that was
seen
unfair. Britain abandoned France when it came to Really Stealthy, Rad Attacks Sometimes May Cause Problems
enforce the terms.
Hitler used discontent over TOV terms to rise to power: Rearmament (1935): initially secret rearmament to
war
guilt, disarmament, reparations, and colonies. reduce
unemployment, Hitler disrupted Geneva
Discontentment from peace treaties, in combination with conference, took Germany out
of LON. This boosted Nazi
the great
depression that fostered the rise of extremism support as people wanted Rearmament.
Britain thought
and political
violence, spurred aggression from Japan, reasonable & not good enough for war and good buffer
Italy and Germany against communism, thought TOV unfair so did nothing
Disarmament and self-determination clauses also caused Saar plebiscite (1935): 90% wanted to return to German
problems: rule =
good morale booster
Only Germany disarmed. Hitler exploited Rhineland (1936): 30,000 German troops reoccupied the
disadvantage to rise
power by exposing the hypocrisy Rhineland
strip. British public perceived it as reasonable
of the League. to want to defend
backyard. Violation of TOV & Locarno,
Displacement of nationalities. Lots of small very big risk as if failed
Hitler would’ve lost support of
economically weak
states drained League’s resources army, humiliating, negative
propaganda and would be
forced to withdraw. Hitler chose carefully
even though
they were outnumbered and lacked essential equipment
3.2. What were the consequences of &
air support. Triggered by: USSR-France mutual support
the failures of the League in the 1930s? treaty (1935),
Hitler claimed ‘encirclement threat’
Anschluss (1938): Nazis demonstrated, some Austrians
Manchuria and Abyssinia, along with disarmament wanted
union, riots in Austria, Hitler persuaded
failure, led to LON
losing all credibility. ‘Nail in the coffin’ Australian Chancellor
Schuschnigg that Anschluss only
for its authority. way to solve crisis was union, on
being refused help from
Exposed League’s weaknesses Britain and France he called referendum.
This was an
Britain & France unprepared for war and wanted to avoid Election of intimidation, in March 1938 Hitler’s troops
it as much
as possible. Needed to buy time to prepare. walked in without military interference. Britain felt it was
Led to appeasement,
which made Hitler more confident right,
Lord Halifax assured Hitler
Led to the second world war Spanish Civil War: Hitler & Mussolini supported General
Franco’s
right-wing extremist rebels against communist
supporter of the
Republican government. LON helpless.
3.3. How far was Hitler’s foreign policy Condor legion bombed Guernica.
(Nationalist victory).
to blame for the outbreak of war in Dress rehearsal/testing ground for WW2.
Munich Pact (1938): Czechoslovakia (pg. 267) Triumph?
1939? Averted
war, gain time, people learnt to not trust Hitler
(Opinion poll Oct
1938- 93% did not believe his claim of
Role of Hitler’s foreign policy: expansionism intent clearly have no more territorial
ambition in Europe) or Sell out?
outlined in Mein Kampf, Nazi Party gained support in Public relief overstated-not really
peace just preparation
Germany and he
gambled his way to rearmament, period, appeasement failed, Allies lost
important ally.
Rhineland, Sudetenland,
Czechoslovakia, Poland. Trigger: claim that Czech government mistreating
Germans in Sudetenland, wanted to ’rescue’ them by 1st
WWW.ZNOTES.ORG
CAIE IGCSE HISTORY (0470)
Oct. Britain
sees demands as unreasonable and mobilizes Stalin joined LON in
1934 for security purposes but it was
army, war imminent.
Resolved with Munich pact & joint soon powerless. France and
Britain had not resisted
declaration (peace for our time)
on 29th September 1938. German Rearmament or expansion in east
Europe, failed
Czechs and USSR not consulted about
conceding to stand up to Hitler in Rhineland and
Czechoslovakia.
Sudetenland to Germany. Stalin signed mutual Defense treaty with France in
1935
Czechoslovakia: 15 March 1939, invaded with no but did not trust France. Attempts to form alliance with
resistance from
Britain or France. Britain and France failed in March 1939 as Chamberlain
Poland invasion: 1st September 1939 did not trust
Stalin. Stalin did not trust Hitler, saw Britain’s
Polish guarantee,
which was intended to warn Hitler, as
3.5. Was the policy of appeasement support for USSR’s potential
enemies.
Nazi Soviet Pact signed between Molotov and Ribbentrop
justified? on 24th
August 1939.Stalin signed because:
Could not rely on Britain and France for defense
(Coined by Chamberlain and Daladier) against Hitler
due to appeasement
Hitler would led Stalin expand control into Baltic
Yes: major domestic problems: high unemployment and States which
Britain and France would never allow
large debts,
militarily and economically weak & needed to Allowed USSR to buy time to prepare for war
buy time, LON failed
∴ appeasement only feasible option, Significance:
saw Hitler’s
demands as reasonable, no support for a war Cleared the way for German invasion of Poland
within commonwealth & US
and memories of war still Poland fell
strong Hitler ‘standing up to communism’ Guaranteed war with Britain and France
No: encouraged Hitler’s aggression mistook Hitler for Established that appeasement had failed
sane
politician and trusted Hitler too much, allowed
Germany to grow
strong and it alienated the USSR,
leading to Nazi-Soviet pact that
made the war more likely,
lost Czechoslovakia as important ally.
WWW.ZNOTES.ORG
CAIE IGCSE HISTORY (0470)
WWW.ZNOTES.ORG
CAIE IGCSE HISTORY (0470)
Blame USSR for radical ideology dedicated to world To rest American strength – whether they would back
revolution and
justifies perception of threat off or face
up
Blame USA for underestimating USSR’s loss and To trap the USA into nuclear war – he did not even try
misperceiving defense
as hostility to hide
them
Blame both for miscommunication, tension, and To get upper hand in arms race due to concern over
ideological
differences. missile gap
would prevent US ever launching 1st strike
To bargain with USA for concessions: remove military
American reaction to Cuban revolution (1958, led by Fidel During the Second World War, when France (ex-colonial
Castro
Castro-claimed he wanted to merely run Cuba ruler of
Vietnam) was defeated by Germany, Japan took
without American
interference. However, by summer control of Vietnamese
resources (coal, rice, rubber,
1960 he was receiving arms from
USSR): railways, roads) which led to the
formation of a strong
frosty relationship with no direct confrontation anti-Japanese resistance movement called Viet
Minh, led
Castro nationalized American assets, therefore; by communist Ho Chi Minh, who inspired Vietnamese
US banned the buying of sugar July 1960 peasants
to flight for an independent Vietnam. In 1945
US ended all trade relations by Oct 1960 they entered Hanoi and
declared independence > led to
US broke off diplomacy with Cuba in January 1961. war in 1946 between French and Viet
Minh. When
Not prepared to tolerate Soviet satellite 160 km communists took over in China, American paranoia grew,
off coast
of Florida. and they spent $500 million a year to keep up anti-Viet
April 1961–Bay of Pigs invasion: 1400 anti-Castro CIA Minh effort
and keep Vietnam non-communist.
trained exiles
attempt to overthrow Castro. Met by 20,
000 troops armed with tanks
and modern weapons, all
What was the domino theory?
captured or killed. Kennedy humiliated.
Aftermath: Bay of Pigs fiasco encouraged spread of American theory that USSR trying to spread communism
communism,
consolidated Castro’s power & popularity, all over Asia;
Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, Burma, India may
led to Cuba being aligned
with Moscow. May 1962: USSR fall to communism one
after the other like a row of
publicly announced military support for
Cuba. July 1962: dominoes after Vietnam, the first
domino.
Cuba best equipped army in Latin America. On 11th
Sept.,
US warned USSR against nuclearization of Cuba
Cuban Missile Crisis: What were the Geneva agreements of 1954?
Ongoing tensions at all time high: competition, space
race, arms
race, nuclear testing, Vietnam war, failed They split up Indochina into different countries like Laos,
Vietnam summit and
Berlin Wall Cambodia, Vietnam, and Thailand
On 14th Oct 1962, an American U-2 spy plane flew Split Vietnam at 17th parallel.
over Cuba and
discovered nuclear missile bases, also Vietminh pulled out of south (replaced by Diem), French
20 ships carrying
missiles from USSR pulled out
of north (replaced by Ho Chi Minh)
Kennedy’s options (page 349): Free elections to take place July 1956
Do nothing: would be very dangerous to overreact but
did not
want to show weakness
Why did US get involved?
Surgical air attack: destroy missiles but if any were left
they
may be used in counter attack and Containment: domino theory – paranoia about Indochina,
There may be soviet collateral damage. Attack without China had
turned communist in 1949 – Viet Minh seen as
advance
warning was immoral. Chinese puppets and
containment in Korea failed had to
Invade Cuba by sea and air: would guarantee soviet compete with USSR.
response to
protect Cuba or within soviet sphere of French army (AVRN) too weak, ill equipped and inefficient
influence to defeat
Viet Cong (Viet Minh) and could not cope with
Diplomatic pressures through UN: would avoid guerrilla warfare.
South Vietnam could not win by itself.
conflict but US
would look weak US had been attacked by North Vietnamese patrol boats –
Blockade/quarantine: show US was serious but not an USS Maddox
in the Gulf of Tonkin (August 1964); February
act of war,
but would not get rid of existing missiles 1965 –Vietcong had
attacked US airbases, US soldiers
Khrushchev’s intent: killed
To defend Cuba
WWW.ZNOTES.ORG
CAIE IGCSE HISTORY (0470)
Militarily
How did the US get involved? Politically = sped up domino effect. By 1975, both Laos
and Cambodia
were communist
US was attacked and needed to face up to communism
Had been pouring in $500 million to support the French
against Viet
Minh communists already 6. How Secure was the USSR’s
Supported Diem’s corrupt and inefficient government
who would have
to give in to communists on their own. Control Over Eastern Europe,
How did US get out?
1948-1989?
Pressure on USSR and China – they had fallen out of an 6.1. Opposition to Soviet control in
alliance, USA
tried to improve relations with them
individually (SALT with USSR,
Feb 1972 Nixon visited Hungary & Czechoslovakia, USSR’s
China) to persuade them to pressure North
Vietnam to
end the war
reaction?
Peace negotiations with North Vietnam – early 1969 –
Hungarian uprising causes:
Henry Kissinger
met with Vietnamese Le Duc Tho
Vietnamization of the war effort – building up South Poverty due to reparations, patriotism (hatred of AVH and
Vietnamese
forces and withdrawing 400, 000 US troops censorship and Soviet presence – troops, shops, streets,
from April 1969 to end of
1971 schools),
religion ban (cardinal mindzentsky out in jail),
Bombing – increased bombing campaigns against North hated lack of
freedom, encouraged by destalinization and
Vietnam to show
he was not weak. Also, invaded Viet expected US
(Eisenhower) to help. Riots by students on
Cong bases in Cambodia. 23rd October: smashed
statue of Stalin and attacked AVH
(secret police). Imre Nagy asked
Russia to withdraw from
Warsaw Pact and declared neutrality for
Hungary and
Why did US fail to defeat the Viet Minh?
freedom achieved on 29 Oct.
US had hi-tech tactics that used B-52 bombers, artillery Soviet reaction: 4th November = rebellions crushed, Nagy
and
helicopters and killed innocent people demoralizing killed,
Janos Kador replaces Nagy. Results:
their own troops
and losing local support (South 200, 000 refugees fled to Austria
Vietnamese peasants) whereas the
Viet Minh used Repression and control by USSR in Hungary continued
guerrilla warfare tactics, which were appropriate to
the 30,000 Hungarians killed
nature of the war and the relief features of Vietnam – West is horrified, polarization of cold war
they used
booby traps, land mines, did not wear uniform US gains determination to contain communism.
and mixed with and
helped the peasants which made it Player motives: Eisenhower did not think Hungary was
difficult to distinguish them and
they won local support. worth war.
American troops were inexperienced and South USSR vetoed investigations.
Vietnamese government
was inefficient and corrupt, Britain and France were preoccupied with Suez Crisis.
whereas Viet Cong represented people
well and had been Russia wanted to keep buffer zone of friendly states
fighting with Japan since World War 2 and later on
with and could
not have Nagy leave Warsaw Pact.
the French. They were determined to achieve Nagy too capitalistic, hard liners within USSR and
independence and
victory, whatever the cost. American China pushed
USSR to stop damaging communism by
troops had hit rock bottom
morale, it was an unpopular allowing Nagy to rule.
war – whereas Viet Cong was motivated
for unification. Prague spring background: 1967, Czechoslovakia
US had supplies coming from 8000 miles away whereas students and
writers complain about lack of freedom and
Viet Cong were
supplied weapons by USSR and China economic problems.
Novotny (Czech leader) received no
through HO Chi Minh trail. Could
not attack this trial help from Brezhnev (USSR leader).
On 5th January 1968,
without escalating the war. Dubeck (reformer) took over as a leader of KSC
(communist party). Announced ‘Action Plan’ in April –
more freedom
of speech, ‘socialism with a human face’ –
Why did the war rouse so much opposition in America? removed state controls
over industry – new model of
socialism 4 months = freedom in
Czechoslovakia.
Casualties, fighting for their country 8000 miles away – Causes: driven by detente (improving relations with the
public did
not buy it, failures & horrors of war and My Lai west)
and Romania’s break free from Warsaw Pact.
massacre
publicized. Johnson had to cancel ‘The Great Czechs hated economy
control and censorship. They
Society’ reform plan
due to the cost. Even Martin Luther thought US would help.
King opposed the war.
Containment had failed and 58, Soviet reaction: 3rd August 1968 – declaration on
000 casualties. 1973 Truman Doctrine
abandoned. Czechoslovakia
to politically stabilize
Brezhnev under pressure from Ulbricht (hardline leader
of East
Germany) and Gomulka (hardline leader of
Vietnam & containment: A failure
WWW.ZNOTES.ORG
CAIE IGCSE HISTORY (0470)
WWW.ZNOTES.ORG
CAIE IGCSE HISTORY (0470)
WWW.ZNOTES.ORG
CAIE IGCSE
HISTORY (0470)