Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lauren Le
Dr. Farmer
ETEC 695
22 February 2022
Challenges and Successes of Online Collaborative Learning
Collaboration has been an essential tool in education as it helps promote learning while
increasing student engagement. Collaborative learning requires at least two students working
together to achieve a learning outcome or goal. Students have the ability to learn from one
another and work together to achieve learning objectives. There are technological tools to
support educators and students in an online learning environment. Web 2.0 tools is an umbrella
term where users are allowed to interact and create content with other users. There has been a
shift in education ever since students were forced to learn online because of the Covid-19 global
pandemic. While planning for learning during or after the pandemic, it is crucial for educators to
be cognizant of how learning has shifted. Accessibility, empathy, simplicity, and flexibility are
items to be mindful of when teaching online (Locke, 2020). This will help create a more
The articles that were chosen for this literature review are within the last three years. The
global pandemic started almost two years ago. Therefore, the articles will help provide a better
as collaborative learning online, cooperative learning, online learning, Web 2.0 tools, and
distance learning were used to help find articles. All of the articles were found through ERIC’s
This literature review discusses the parameters of what virtual collaborative learning
looks like now. Whether it be collaborative or cooperative learning, this literature review strives
to discuss the main ways collaborative learning is done virtually with the use of Web 2.0 tools,
the challenges of online collaborative learning, and the successes of collaborative learning. One
may use this literature review to plan and implement new strategies of online collaborative
It would be hard to discuss collaborative learning without Web 2.0 tools as these are the
tools that are built for collaboration in a virtual world. Web 2.0 tools involve social media
platforms, but also websites that allow users to express their individuality. In an educational
realm, social media may still be used. However, there is a bigger emphasis on learning
management platforms, wikis, and platforms that allow students to create media (podcasts,
videos, digital art, etc.). With being forced to teach online, teachers have been given the tools to
allow students to navigate their own learning. Instead of consumers, users of Web 2.0 tools are
also producers.
There were a series of Web 2.0 technologies used by a sample group of twelve teachers
that were categorized by themes: content sharing, creating visuals and books, teaching,
communication, and assessment as a study shows. Although there are a number of technologies
that help distance learning, Sahin-Topalcengiz and Yildrim argue that teachers do not do it
effectively enough as they are digital immigrants (2020). Digital immigrants are often labeled as
people who were not born into the generation that has technology (Boyd, 2014). Sahin-
Topalcengiz and Yildrim used the term “digital immigrants” in a harmful way. Boyd critically
analyzes the same term and believes that it is oversimplified. Therefore, it would be interesting
to see how much of being a digital immigrant is responsible for teachers not using Web 2.0 tools.
Although Web 2.0 tools have their perks, teachers find that there are barriers such as taking away
from social interaction and that it is not suitable for every lesson goal (Sahin-Topalcengiz and
Yildrim, 2020). However, one could argue that teachers are not being educated enough on how
Web 2.0 tools can be more effective if taken into account students’ learning styles. In a
study of 83 6th grade students, researchers aimed to determine how learning styles with the use
of Web 2.0 tools affect academic achievement, online cooperative learning attitude level, and
computer thinking skill level (Purbudak & Usta, 2021). To make the study more significant,
there should also be a category on how much experience students have with technology to see if
using Web 2.0 tools is equal for all students. Learning styles and students’ technology skills
must be taken into consideration when assessing the types of Web 2.0 tools to use in a
There are a variety of tools for teachers to teach creatively and support students’ social
needs, there are also its challenges. Collaboration requires the interaction of at least two people.
environment. However, where the “students are either unable to create high-quality shared
knowledge or are unable to communicate with each other, or the online discourse leads to
misunderstandings and formation of ideas, and the mutual dependency is negative” is a result of
online collaborative learning (Magen-Nagar & Shonfeld, 2018). Once students have created a
poor connection with their classmates because of the difficulty of communicating online, they
may simply give up on learning. Teachers will then see that and also steer away from
collaborative learning online as their attitude towards it shifts. The medium to teach online using
learning. Student teachers saw that students had trouble coordinating online discussions
themselves because some groups were unable to distribute tasks to their group members. The
student teachers also saw that students had a tough time introducing themselves to their peers.
They mentioned that students were concerned with how they may be perceived by strangers in
their class (Margallot, Gorev, & Vaisman, 2018). Although collaboration is set to have students
work together, it is harder to do so when a relationship has not been created prior to the virtual
learning experience. To add, as students are not interacting in these collaborative learning
communities, they then do not feel a part of the community and will not want to participate
(Ozkara & Cakir, 2020). The lack of interaction is a fault of online collaborative learning.
Creating relationships with peers will help increase engagement and academic achievement in
the class. Although there is difficulty creating relationships in an online environment, there are
also successes with online collaborative learning. In an online university class of 200 students, a
professor had to creatively design the course to engage learners with their peers and the
curriculum. It is easy for learners to disengage as there are many students in the classroom.
However, two instructional designs were created to ensure that students were agents in their
learning. The class used QA’s, or discussion board, that required students to post questions and
respond to one another. The other design was group papers where students had to work together
to answer a question and then peer review another group’s paper anonymously (Yang, Ghislandi,
& Dellantonio, 2018). The research saw success in these two methods as it held students
the expectations. For example, modeling the first online discussions will provide an opportunity
for students to learn how questions should be asked so that they may use it as a blueprint for
when it is their turn to facilitate an online discussion. Instructors should also be present by
“publishing regular announcements, connecting with each group collaboration to touch base,
participate in weekly discussions, provide virtual hours, and to provide feedback” (Altowairiki,
2021). Although an instructor may ensure that these actions are occurring, the study did not
mention students’ attentiveness to their instructor’s facilitation. The need for a virtually present
instructor is vital in the success of a collaborative online learning community because students
Conclusion
interaction amongst peers and instructors. The use of Web 2.0 tools, or technology that allows
users to become producers of content, has recently been more readily approached by instructors
and learners. Collaborative online learning will look completely different without Web 2.0 tools.
that is quite challenging. Students do not feel that they are a part of a community as they fear
creating relationships with other classmates without having met them. Students also have trouble
properly communicating in a virtual world. These challenges may discourage those from
teachers and students will see success. Creating discussion forums and group assignments that
force students to interact will help. Instructors modeling the expectations also help students
collaborative learning environment. When designing their online class, educators must be aware
that virtual classes take away from the interaction. However, it is their responsibility to ensure
that there is interaction amongst students to help engage students into a learning community, but
also to promote academic success. It is also highly recommended that Web 2.0 tools be used in
Altowairiki, N. (2021). Online collaborative learning: Analyzing the process through living the
experience. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(3), 413–427.
Boyd, d. (2014). Are today’s youth digital natives? In it’s complicated: The social lives of
networked teens. Yale University Press.
Lockee, B. (2020). Designing forward: Instructional design considerations for online learning in
the COVID-19 context. Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 9(3).
https://dx.doi.org/10.51869/93bl
Magen-Nagar, N., & Shonfeld, M. (2018). Attitudes, openness to multiculturalism, and
integration of online collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 1–
11.
Margaliot, A., Gorev, D., & Vaisman, T. (2018). How student teachers describe the online
collaborative learning experience and evaluate its contribution to their learning and their
future work as teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(2), 88–
102.
Ozkara, B. O., & Cakir, H. (2020). Comparison of collaborative and individual learning in
online learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 19(4), 66–
74.
Pürbudak, A., & Usta, E. (2021). Collaborative group activities in the context of learning
styles on web 2.0 environments: An experimental study. Participatory Educational
Research, 8(2), 407–420.
Sahin-Topalcengiz, E., & Yildirim, B. (2020). Teachers’ opinions about distance web 2.0 tools
training and teachers’ in-class web 2.0 practices. Journal of Turkish Science Education,
17(4), 561–577.