Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Through the increase of scientific innovations, the planet inevitably follows with
environmental setbacks. Through the increase in products, comes a larger number of factories,
which directly impacts the world’s carbon footprint. This creates a negative impact on the
pollution and overall health of human-beings. However, delving deeper into the positives of
innovation on the planet, there are several evident pros. This includes the benefits of the health of
mankind. Amputees are able to live a high-functioning life due to the prosthetics that enable their
abilities. Medicines are able to cure the sick and give them the potential at resuming a healthy
lifestyle. Consequences with this are also possible. An unintended result leaves room for error,
which may create several other problems. For example, Thalidomide was a medicine that was
produced and sold as a popular drug in the late 1950s and early 1960s (Kim and Scialli). Its
initial intentions involved creating relief from nausea and vomiting in pregnant women. However
faulty testing and a lack of precision in biochemical scientists arose severe congenital
malformations and other defects in children born of a mother who consistently used thalidomide.
This was due to accidental production of enantiomers in a racemic mixture. An enantiomer is a
molecular term that focuses on a mirrored image of a compound that results in a differentiated
effect than the intended compound. Though thalidomide was banned in 1961 in most countries, it
is still used for patients with myeloma and leprosy. This issue with the continued use of
thalidomide however is the lack of scientific information and surveillance in rural countries/
communities. Pregnant women with myeloma or leprosy continue to use their prescribed
medicine, unknowingly causing severe birth defects in their child.
Though innovation has created an overall positive impact on the world today,
understanding the consequences of a slight molecular disruption is crucial in the safety of
humanity moving forward with science. Again, several positives are included in the innovation
of science and technology. Such instances are especially shown in the impact of prosthetic
devices or transplants. Such success stories are prevalent in lives such as tilly’s, a young girl with
bionic arms after losing them due to meningococcal septicemia strain b. Her full story is in the
following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDb0xiYdKeg. Stories like Tilly’s are ones
that are especially important when considering the positive effects of scientific innovation.
6. Has the world’s biotechnology strayed from the ability to become religious?
In the sense that scientists stray further from God’s protection and closer to man-made
medicines, it may start to feel like we are the highest intelligent beings. It grows easier to forget
the creator of the universe, that specifically created us as human beings to be able to create and
help ourselves. However the issue arises as individuals believe their own abilities to be God-like,
editing DNA to create or alter a living organism, and solve issues of the world that seem most
prevalent. However God solves the problems we don't see coming. He ultimately is the one that
gives us the ability to think up such technological advancements, especially in the scientific
world. So, while atheistic scientists see their own abilities and discoveries as higher than the
biblical explanations of the world, this may stray from their ability to become religious, with the
information they believe is correct. With this, in the broad perspective of the entirety of the
world, those who are not in easy access to these medicines are at a higher likelihood to put their
faith in God rather than medicines. It is ultimately a leap of faith in the understanding that we
weren’t evolved from other animals, and rather God created us as human beings in a definite
form. The world’s biotechnology is a product of God’s work, though a shallow perspective sees
it as human intelligence. God has given human-kind the ability to use biotechnology for the
benefits of our own health and quality of life. While it has not made society stray from the ability
to become religious, it is important to understand and resort back to the deeper meaning behind
our own abilities. As described in the article, Salvation for Algorithm, “The assertion that
religion is a tool for organizing human societies may vex those for whom it represents first and
foremost a spiritual path,” (Harari).
7. What is biotechnology?
According to NTNU.edu, “Biotechnology is technology that utilizes biological systems,
living organisms or parts of this to develop or create different products.” This definition includes
DNA profiling or cloning, transgenesis, genome analysis, and tissue and stem cells engineering
(Modern Biotechnology). The most commonly used form of biotechnology is referred to as
medical biotechnology, however there are also forms of biotechnology concerning agricultural,
environmental, and industrial.
9. What are the major forms of biotechnology prevalent in our society today?
In this project, I focus on the recent findings and experimentations with gene-editing,
which seems to be the most prevalent issue that also interacts with moral or biblical code.
However, some of the major forms prevalent in society today is the overall topic of DNA
technology, medicine such as antibiotics and vaccines, and DNA profiling in forensics. Overall,
biotechnology is commonly associated with the medical usage of it. However the agricultural,
industrial, and environmental biotechnology are also common usages of the term. DNA
technology is the broad term used for any type of biotechnology that uses the DNA of a living
substance to create a separate product, or use it towards a specific purpose. DNA profiling is
used to distinguish the exact identity of fingerprints found at a crime scene, which has been a
useful tool to make the detective at the scene able to identify the criminal in a timely fashion.
22. Is it more morally correct to let an individual die or to save them with biotechnology?
When considering God’s plan, the answer might be to just let them into the hand of God.
However it seems more morally incorrect to allow someone to die if there are ulterior ways of a
cure. It's ultimately an answer that depends on one's perspective. As for me, I think it is incorrect
to let someone die before experimenting with all possible ways of treatment.
23. What is CRISPR?
CRISPR is an acronym for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats.
This explains the biochemical structure of how our immune system is able to function, however
scientists have manipulated its structure to be able to fulfill different roles in the human cell.
25. Where should the line be drawn for biotechnology to satisfy our faith?
With the development of biotechnology, it may satisfy our faith in the sense that it helps
us to live to our fullest potential, and fulfill God’s plan.