Zuniga 1

Jonah Zuniga

Instructor McCann

English 1302.203

3 May 2022

Death Penalty

To begin off, there are criminals round the sector and a few criminals are substantially

worse than others. With that being said, with a few criminals committing worse moves than

others the authorities from time to time is going with the concept of capital punishment or

additionally called the loss of life penalty. The contemporary verbal exchange going round with

the loss of life penalty is that must or not it's a factor and in that case is it morally or ethically

accurate to take someone`s lifestyles via way of means of the palms of the authorities?

According to Cattani, Kent E., and Paul J. McMurdie, “Murder is one in every of the "maximum

deserving of the loss of life penalty." that means that they as human beings help the loss of life

penalty. This creator Mamczarz, Katarzyna states that “Waiting for loss of life is a sort of torture.

Worse than loss of life itself.” This manner that she herself does now no longer consider

withinside the loss of life penalty, however “why?” is the actual question. Some human beings

do now no longer realize in the event that they even help the concept of the loss of life penalty,

and they're pressured to a point. For example, Gross, Samuel, R went to regulation college and

the subject of the loss of life penalty receives said and he is going on to mention that he did now

no longer realize whether or not or now no longer to help the loss of life penalty in California.

The verbal exchange happening with the loss of life penalty is everywhere in the area and does

now no longer have actuality with someone institution of human beings. Even faith may be

delivered into the verbal exchange pronouncing that the Bible helps it and others do now no
 Zuniga 2

longer so it does now no longer have a clean answer. Even with all this uncertainty going round

with the loss of life penalty there are a few human beings which might be clean with their

solutions and a few which might be now no longer. Furthermore, the loss of life penalty has

many specific evaluations on it however is it moral and moral, or is it absolutely withinside the

wrong?

Ethical VS Wrong

First of all, the death penalty is one of the most controversial issues in the world, and there are

many disagreements on many issues, especially in the United States. First, what do people think

about the death penalty, and why do they believe in what they believe? "Individuals with higher

social capital are less likely to support government actions to kill convicted criminals," according

to Mangum and Maruice. This means that people with high social capital are more likely to

support the death penalty than people with low social capital. According to Thompson, Rebecca

R. et al. Do they believe that "people are likely to accept and respect the decisions of the

judiciary in order to be consistent with the society in which they live"? This means that people

are more likely to be sentenced to death, based on what the government says. .. People do this

to be consistent with the government and the society in which they are located.

Japan’s Death Penalty

Also, the death penalty in the United States is slightly different in Japan and the United

States. For example, like Mamczarz, Katarzyna puts it in the first paragraph. "Waiting for death

is a kind of torture. This means that the death penalty is not always accepted in Japan. It is

because they believe that death itself is not something one can tolerate. It's completely wrong.

This is the belief of the Japanese people, but as Mamzarz said, Katargina once again said: In

2017, four were executed, three were sentenced to death, and a total of 134 were sentenced to
 Zuniga 3

maximum. The death penalty is not well accepted in Japan, but the death penalty is still high. In

2018, Japan executed more than 13 people. This is the highest number since 10 people were

executed in 2008.

Corruption in Death Penalty?

Many people believe that the death penalty has more to do with corruption than with

people actually deciding whether or not to use the death penalty. "Corruption still exists," says

Hulpke, John F. The wrongdoings continue unabated. If there were any penalties, they were

minor. Corporations that fail to meet accepted ethical standards on a consistent basis should be

forced to close their doors. Companies that use corruption to achieve their goals, cause

permanent environmental damage, physical agony and death, or violate fundamental human

rights should face the death penalty." He claims that the death penalty should never be used.

Arizona Death Penalty

The author supports the use of the death penalty because it describes whether Arizona's

death penalty is managed at the state or local level. Two former prosecutors, now judges at the

Arizona Court of Appeals, propose to change the state's death penalty process so that the

decision to charge someone for the death penalty is made at the state level rather than at the

county level. doing. Murder is one of the "most vicious crimes worthy of the death penalty." It

also makes it easier to limit the types of cases in which the death penalty is required to those

cases where such convictions have been convicted in court and are likely to be upheld in an

appeal. Ultimately, the death penalty in Arizona was applied unevenly throughout the state, and

reforms made it possible to make it even.

Death Penalty In General

 Zuniga 4

Many factors contribute to the disparity in US public opinion regarding the use of the

death penalty. Many studies have investigated public opinion about the death penalty, but none

have investigated the role of social capital in deciding whether people support or oppose the

death penalty. According to this paper, social capital explains why some Americans oppose the

death penalty and others do not. This article discusses what some Americans say about

supporting or opposed the death penalty, but the author makes no clear statement as to whether

they oppose the death penalty. Finally, people with high social capital are less likely to support

the government's actions to execute convicted criminals. This hypothesis turned out to be correct.

Social capital is inversely proportional to the support for the death penalty, according to logistic

regression analysis using data from the 2008 US National Election Survey.

Opinions on Death Penalty

First of all, people want their inner thoughts to be in sync with the outside world. People

are more likely to accept and respect the decisions of the judiciary in order to adapt to the society

in which they live. Few studies have examined these prejudices in real life. We examined the

relationship between the conviction of Dzhokhar Zarnaev (Boston Marathon bomber) and the

American view of his punishment in a natural quasi-experiment. Consistent with the justification

literature, we expected that Tsarnaev's conviction would be accompanied by increased support

for his death sentence. Also, in this article, the author discusses why people support the death

penalty, rather than directly arguing whether they oppose the death penalty. They rely heavily on

secondary data, numbers and statistics to determine if people support the death penalty.
 Zuniga 5

Work Cited

Cattani, Kent E., and Paul J. McMurdie. “Death Penalty 101: The Death Penalty Charging

Decision in Arizona. Is There a Better Way?” Arizona State Law Journal, vol. 53, no. 3, Fall

2021, pp. 793–803. EBSCOhost,

https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lgh&AN=155174311&scope=site.

Gerwig-Moore, Sarah. “Death Penalty.” Mercer Law Review, vol. 70, no. 1, Fall 2018, pp.

73–80. EBSCOhost,

https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=134567440&scope=site.

GROSS, SAMUEL R. “The Death Penalty, Public Opinion, and Politics in the United States.” St.

Louis University Law Journal, vol. 62, no. 4, Summer 2018, pp. 763–79. EBSCOhost,

https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lgh&AN=136685001&scope=site.

Hulpke, John F. “If All Else Fails, A Corporate Death Penalty?” Journal of Management Inquiry,

vol. 26, no. 4, Oct. 2017, pp. 433–39. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617706545.

Lee, Jason, and Ryan Hall. “The Death Penalty and Mental Illness: An Evolving Standard?”

Psychiatric Times, vol. 34, no. 6, June 2017, pp. 1–4. EBSCOhost,

https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=123799948&scope=site.
 Zuniga 6

Mamczarz, Katarzyna. “The Death Penalty in Japan.” Japan Mission Journal, vol. 72, no. 4,

Winter 2018, pp. 234–40. EBSCOhost,

https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asn&AN=133747478&scope=site.

Mangum, Maruice. “Testing the Influence of Social Capital on Support for the Death Penalty.”

Social Justice Research, vol. 32, no. 4, Dec. 2019, pp. 431–44. EBSCOhost,

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-019-00341-9.