Zuniga 1

Jonah Zuniga

Instructor McCann

English 1302.203

3 May 2022

Death Penalty and Why it is Wrong

The death penalty is one of the most controversial issues in the United States, and many

support it. On the other hand, the death penalty is absolutely unjustified. Using taxpayer money

and unnecessarily large amounts of resources to execute someone is harmful to the community.

Why is the death penalty so bad, and why does it hurt the general public? It harms the general

public in many different ways, and it also harms the economy. Ultimately, the death penalty is

wrong in so many ways that it hurt people in so many different ways. So should the death

penalty be supported in the United States? Or should it be one of the topics that shouldn't be a

topic at all? There are many studies showing that the death penalty should not be upheld and

should not be real.

First of all, one of the reasons why the death penalty is unjustified is that it is paid in

taxpayer's money. It spends a lot of taxpayer money, especially the average citizen taxpayer's

money. The term "common people" refers to people with a low-income and middle-class

background. The enormous cost of carrying out a death sentence is a rationale for those who

oppose it. The state loses thousands of dollars in statutory costs, doctor costs, and injections each

year due to the death penalty. The cost of executing the death penalty can be ten times higher

than if it were not executed. As a result of the death penalty, the state loses thousands of dollars

in legal costs, doctors, and injections each year. The cost of the death penalty can be ten times

higher than the cost of not executing the death penalty. The state can spend up to twice as much
 Zuniga 2

money on people facing the death penalty as the life imprisonment of 4,444. The death penalty

advocates claim that those who commit violent crimes are worthy of death. The death penalty

advocates argue that the death penalty process should be simplified, faster and cheaper. The

death line conviction could be imprisoned for decades before being charged with the murder of

people. Convict on death row agrees to reduce the number of innocent people killed by staying in

prison for a long time, but years are sufficient instead of decades.

Another motive human beings oppose the dying penalty is that harmless human beings

may be by chance killed. Many had been sentenced to dying and observed to be harmless. There

is not anything you could or say to undo this kind of huge mistake. Opponents of the dying

penalty argue that the country have to now no longer waste cash on killing a person else,

however spend it on some thing extra useful. B. Condolence own circle of relatives counseling.

They want human beings to "kill" them. Opponents of the dying penalty argue that placing

prisoners to sleep in jail officials and medical doctors might harm them. You increase a soldier

getting back from battle affected by PTSD through killing others, you then definitely do the

identical to different harmless human beings. Religion performs an crucial position for people

who oppose the dying penalty. According to the Bible, "You have to now no longer kill" is one of

the Ten Commandments. People additionally like to emphasise the ideology that "responsible

human beings aren't worth of dying." Some Christians accept as true with that the dying penalty

can in no way be justified, irrespective of the crime.All who assist capital punishment agree that

it isn't always humane, and people who violate human rights need to be punished. Those who've

killed harmless human beings and kids do now no longer deserve a 2nd chance. The satisfactory

we are able to do as a society is to exclude such human beings from our society and our prisons.
 Zuniga 3

Another cause many oppose the demise penalty is that now no longer all crimes are

handled equally. There are many instances in which human beings dedicate the identical crime,

however most effective one is sentenced to demise. Discrimination is an crucial component in

this. Discrimination can take the shape of male and woman criminals. Over 90% of convict on

demise row are men. Killing whites is much more likely to go into the demise row than killing

blacks. If a white guy is killed, the demise penalty can be 5 instances higher. Many human beings

sentenced to demise are bad and literate. According to Smith, sixty five percentage of convict on

demise row are black or Hispanic. When bad and uneducated human beings undergo many

strategies and courts, they may be much more likely to emerge as an inferior public defender

crew from the state. Boys and prisoners with intellectual infection might also additionally also be

sentenced to demise despite the fact that they may be below the age of 18.

According to the Dallas Morning News, blacks make up 20% of juries in the death

penalty, but only 3% of juries. The most fundamental violation of human rights, the right to life,

is the death penalty. This is the most cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment you can

imagine. Discrimination based on the death penalty. It is often used by the most vulnerable

members of society, including the poor, ethnic minorities, religious minorities, and people with

intellectual disabilities. Some governments use it to keep their enemies quiet. If the judicial

system is flawed and unfair trials are commonplace, there is always a risk that an innocent

person will be executed. If the death penalty is imposed, it is irreversible. The mistakes you

make are irreversible. Innocent people may be released from prison for crimes they have never

committed, but the death penalty cannot be revoked. What about the death penalty for terrorists?

After violent attacks, governments often use the death penalty to show that they are "protecting"

national security. Execution threats, on the other hand, rarely discourage men and women who
 Zuniga 4

are willing to die like suicide bombers because of their beliefs. Executioners can also spawn

martyrs. The name of the martyr is the rallying point of the organization. After a biased trial,

those convicted of "terrorism" in particular can be sentenced to death. Many were convicted on

the basis of "confessions" extracted under torture. In some cases, special or military courts

established under the Anti-Terrorism Act have sentenced victims to death for violations.

"Is there a humane way to execute someone?" According to Amnesty International, any

form of execution is cruel. Lethal injection is often portrayed as more benevolent than other

execution methods. Decapitation, electrocution, torture and murder, and hanging are examples

of the death penalty. On the other hand, the quest for a "humane" way to kill people should be

seen as to what it is. murderer. What if different communities want to use the death penalty?

According to Amnesty International, some countries have abolished the death penalty. Human

rights, including the most basic right to life, are widely recognized and endorsed by the majority

of countries around the world. All major world religions emphasize mercy, compassion, and

forgiveness. That is why we are calling for the abolition of the death penalty. To date, 140

countries have abolished the death penalty through law or practice, indicating that societies and

cultures around the world are beginning to share the same desire for the death penalty.

According to the BBC, the death penalty does not seem to discourage people from

committing serious violent crimes. The chances of being caught and fined are astounding. The

common view among social scientists is that the deterrent effect of the death penalty has not

been tested at best. What if the death penalty is publicly supported? This means that it has a

positive public opinion. There may be a lack of credible information about the death penalty

before strong public support for the death penalty. The most common misconception is that the

death penalty reduces crime. Many governments are prepared to support this false assumption,
 Zuniga 5

even though there is no evidence to support it. Many important aspects of the application of the

death penalty are misunderstood. The possibility of executing an innocent person, the injustice of

the trial, and the discriminatory nature of the death penalty all contribute to the correct view of

the death penalty. According to Amnesty International, we believe that while promoting human

rights through public education programs, the government should keep this information

transparent. Only then is there real discussions about death.

In summary, many argue whether the death penalty should still exist. There are many

factors to consider when it comes to those who support or oppose the death penalty.

Discrimination, morality and economic conditions all influence people's views of the death

penalty. Whether the death penalty is publicly supported, many countries have not yet abolished

it, or the crime is somehow the most threatening, the death penalty is wrong and considered.

Should not be done. The death penalty has existed for centuries, and it has existed for centuries,

but it is not correct. After all, there are different opinions about the death penalty, but the death

penalty is wrong and always wrong.

 Zuniga 6

Work Cited

Cattani, Kent E., and Paul J. McMurdie. “Death Penalty 101: The Death Penalty Charging

Decision in Arizona. Is There a Better Way?” Arizona State Law Journal, vol. 53, no. 3, Fall

2021, pp. 793–803. EBSCOhost,

https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lgh&AN=155174311&scope=site.

Mangum, Maruice. “Testing the Influence of Social Capital on Support for the Death Penalty.”

Social Justice Research, vol. 32, no. 4, Dec. 2019, pp. 431–44. EBSCOhost,

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-019-00341-9.

GROSS, SAMUEL R. “The Death Penalty, Public Opinion, and Politics in the United States.” St.

Louis University Law Journal, vol. 62, no. 4, Summer 2018, pp. 763–79. EBSCOhost,

https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lgh&AN=136685001&scope=site.

Lee, Jason, and Ryan Hall. “The Death Penalty and Mental Illness: An Evolving Standard?”

Psychiatric Times, vol. 34, no. 6, June 2017, pp. 1–4. EBSCOhost,

https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=123799948&scope=site.

Gerwig-Moore, Sarah. “Death Penalty.” Mercer Law Review, vol. 70, no. 1, Fall 2018, pp.

73–80. EBSCOhost,

https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=134567440&scope=site.
 Zuniga 7

Hulpke, John F. “If All Else Fails, A Corporate Death Penalty?” Journal of Management Inquiry,

vol. 26, no. 4, Oct. 2017, pp. 433–39. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617706545.

Mere, Winibaldus Stefanus. “Dignity, Biblical Justice, Forgiveness, and the Death Penalty.”

Japan Mission Journal, vol. 74, no. 4, Winter 2020, pp. 259–67. EBSCOhost,

https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asn&AN=149003583&scope=site.

Thompson, Rebecca R., et al. “National Opinions on Death Penalty Punishment for the Boston

Marathon Bomber before versus after Sentencing.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, vol. 26,

no. 4, Nov. 2020, pp. 455–62. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000244.