Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jukui
Jukui
Physics and Electronics Engineering College, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, 730070, People’s Republic of China
Received August 11, 2002; accepted in revised form September 20, 2002
Abstract where
The stability of oblique modulation of ion-acoustic waves in an unmagnetized q q
warm plasma is studied. A nonlinear Schr˛dinger equation governing the V ¼ ðu; vÞ; H¼ ; :
slow modulation of the wave amplitude is derived. The e¡ect of temperature
qx qy
on the oblique modulational instability of the ion-acoustic wave is
investigated. It is found that the ion temperature signi¢cantly changes the
In the above equations, s ¼ Ti =Teff is the ion temperature
domain of the modulational instability in the k y plane. ratio, and the other notations have their usual meanings.
The variables t, x, y, ni , V, pi , and f are normalized pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffito
the reciprocal ion plasma frequency o1 ðo pi ¼ 4pn0 e2 =mi Þ,
1. Introduction pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pi
ffi
e¡ective Debye length leff ð¼ Teff =4pn0 e Þ, unperturbed 2
There has been a great deal of interest in the study of
equilibrium plasma density n0 , e¡ective ion acoustic velocity
modulational instability of ion-acoustic waves (IAWs) in a pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
plasma [1^4] because of its importance to the stability and trans- veff Teff =mi , equilibrium ion pressure p0 ð¼ n0 Ti Þ, and
port of the latter. The slow modulation of a monochromatic Teff =e, respectively. In order to investigate the modulational
plane wave in plasmas can lead to the formation of envelope instability of small but ¢nite amplitude IAWs in the plasma,
solitons, which are described by the nonlinear Schr˛dinger the independent variables are assumed to be x ¼ eðx vg tÞ
equation (NLSE). In the NLSE, the nonlinearites are in balance and t ¼ e2 t, where e is a small parameter and vg is the group
with the wave group dispersion and the resulting stationary velocity of the wave. The dependent variables are expanded
solutions of the NLSE have an envelope structure. asymptotically as
The modulational instability of the monochromatic IAW 8
> X 1 X1
>
> ¼ þ e nðnÞ
l ðx; tÞ exp½iðk X otÞl;
n
has been reported experimentally [1]. Theoretical studies reveal > n 1
>
>
i
that ¢nite ion temperature, presence of light ion impurities, >
> n¼1 l¼1
>
> X1 X 1
and obliqueness of the modulation are important factors a¡ect- >
>
>
>
> u i ¼ e n
uðnÞ
l ðx; tÞ exp½iðk X otÞl;
ing the IAW modulational instability. The e¡ects of ion plasma >
>
>
>
n¼1 l¼1
temperature on the modulational instability and IAW proper- < X1 X 1
ties have been studied by Xue et al. [4], but only for the case vi ¼ en vðnÞ
l ðx; tÞ exp½iðk X otÞl; ð2Þ
>
>
of parallel modulation. Furthermore, previous investigations >
> n¼1 l¼1
>
> X 1 X1
of oblique modulation of envelope solitary waves are limited >
>
>
> p i ¼ 1 þ e n
pðnÞ
l ðx; tÞ exp½iðk X otÞl;
to cold plasmas. Up to now, there is no investigation on how >
>
>
> n¼1 l¼1
the ion temperature a¡ects the wave instability in the k y >
> X1 X1
>
>
plane. In this paper, we analyze the modulational instability >
: f ¼ e n
fðnÞ
l ðx; tÞ exp½iðk X otÞl;
of IAWs in a warm ion plasma for modulation of the amplitude n¼1 l¼1
of the carrier wave oblique to the direction of its propagation.
and
2. Governing equations and derivation of the NLSE k ¼ ðk cos y; k sin yÞ; X ¼ ðx; yÞ ð3Þ
Here, we consider an obliquely modulated IAW traveling in the where k is the magnitude of the wave vector and y is the angle
(x, y) plane in a collisionless plasma consisting of warm, inertial made by the wave vector k with the positive x direction. n,
ðnÞ
ions and hot, isothermal, and Boltzmann distributed electrons. V, p and f satisfy the reality condition AðnÞ
l ¼ A l and the
We further assume that the modulated amplitude of the IAW asterisk denotes complex conjugate. Substituting the
varies in the x direction. The normalized £uid equations are expression (2) into Eqs (1) and collecting the terms in the dif-
8 ferent powers of e, we can obtain each nth-order reduced
> qni
>
> þ H ðni VÞ ¼ 0; equation. For the ¢rst order (n ¼ 1) equation, we obtain
>
> qt
>
> 8
>
> onð1Þ ð1Þ
< qV þ V HV þ s Hpi ¼ Hf; l þ k cos yul þ k sin yvl ¼ 0;
1
> >
>
>
>
qt ni ð1Þ >
>
> >
>
> ouð1Þ ð1Þ
l þ sk cos ypl ¼ k cos yfl ;
ð1Þ
>
> qp <
>
> i
þ V Hpi þ 3pi H V ¼ 0;
>
> ovð1Þ ð1Þ ð1Þ
ð4Þ
> qt
> > l þ sk sin ypl ¼ k sin yfl
>
: 2 >
>
H f ¼ expðfÞ ni ; >
>
>
> opð1Þ ð1Þ ð1Þ
l þ 3k cos yul þ 3k sin yvl ¼ 0;
>
>
:
*e-mail: xuejk@163.com ð1 þ k2 l 2 Þfð1Þ ð1Þ
l nl ¼ 0:
For the second order (n ¼ 2) equation with l ¼ 1, we obtain for the slow evolution of the amplitude of the perturbation
the second order quantities nð2Þ ð2Þ ð2Þ potential f fð1Þ
1 . In the above equation, the coe⁄cients
1 , u1 and p1 in terms of
qfð1Þ P and Q are given by
the function fð2Þ
1 and qx :
1
8 1 k2
> qfð1Þ P¼
>
> ð2Þ 2 ð2Þ 2 o3 ð1 þ k2 Þ
>
> n ¼ ð1 þ k Þf 2ik cos y 1
;
>
>
1 1
qx 2
>
> o þ sk2 o2 2
>
> 3 ðo 3s 1Þ þ 3sðo þ 3sk Þ
2 2
>
> ð1Þ
> uð2Þ ¼ oð1 þ k Þ cos yfð2Þ iA qf1 ;
2
> ð1 þ k2 Þ2 k2
>
< 1 k 1
qx
ð7Þ 1 k2 o
>
> cos2 y þ ; ð10Þ
>
> oð1 þ k2 Þ qfð1Þ 2o ð1 þ k2 Þ2 2k2
>
> vð2Þ ¼ sin yfð2Þ iB 1 ;
>
> 1
k 1
qx
>
>
>
>
>
> qfð1Þ k2 1
>
>
: pð2Þ ¼ 3ð1 þ k 2 ð2Þ
Þf 6ik cos y 1
; Q¼
1 1
qx 2o 3s v2g þ 1
From the compatibility condition one obtains: o2
126s2 þ 4 2 ð3s þ 1Þ ð1 þ k2 Þ2 þ 42s þ 21sk2
k
k 1 qo
vg ¼ þ 3s cos y ¼ ; k4 k6 k2
o ð1 þ k Þ
2 2 qk 54s2 3 þ
o2 o2 ð1 þ k2 Þ4 ð1 þ k2 Þ2
where 2 4
2k 2k
7 18s 2 9s 2 cos2 y
1 cos2 y 1 þ k2 o o
A ¼ 3sðk2 1Þ þo ;
1þk 2 o k2
k4
þ þ 3ðs 1Þk 18sðs þ 1Þð1 þ k Þ
2 2 2
1 sin 2y ð1 þ k2 Þ2
B ¼ 3sðk2 1Þ :
1 þ k2 2o
ð1 þ k2 Þ3 3 k2
6s½2sð1 þ 4k Þ þ 1
2
þ 6sk 4s 2
2
The second harmonic mode of the carrier wave is also o 2 o
obtained in terms of ½fð1Þ
1 . This comes from nonlinear self-
2
ð1 þ k2 Þ2 1 5 k2 k4 ð1 þ k2 Þ
interaction. The component of l ¼ 2 for the second-order s þ k2 þ ðs 1Þ 2 2s 2
(n ¼ 2) equations determines the second harmonic quantities o 4 2 o o o
4
8 ð2Þ 1 k 3 4 3 1 1 þ 3k2
> n2 ¼ f1=2 þ Cð1 þ 4k2 Þg½fð1Þ þ þ s þ sk 2
þ s þ
1 ;
2
>
> o o2 2 4 12o ð1 þ k2 Þ2
>
>
>
>
> ð2Þ
> k
>
>
> u2 ¼ D cos y½fð1Þ1 ;
2 1 þ k2 k4 1 k2 1
> o þ s: 2 þ s þ : ð11Þ
>
< 12 o 3 o2 oð1 þ k2 Þ
vð2Þ
k
sin y½fð1Þ ð8Þ
2 ¼ D 1 ;
2
>
>
>
> o
>
>
>
>
>
> pð2Þ ð1Þ 2
2 ¼ 3f1=2 þ ð1 þ k Þ þ Cð1 þ 4k Þg½f1 ;
2 2 2 3. Stability analysis and discussion
>
>
>
> Linear stability analysis of (9) shows [4] that the wave is
: ð2Þ
f2 ¼ C½fð1Þ
1 ;
2
modulationally unstable when PQ > 0 in the modulation
# Physica Scripta 2003 Physica Scripta 67
76 Xue Jukui and Tang Rongan