Low 0€ torts Assignment eae Name: Mshank jeet Sing ‘ign I toate Enrollment Ne: 040202871 fia baie ee wea tea Pat: DOU 1a Codeshare clasétla 13m seen attic SV Ge US ae ere een GA Distinguish ioe Me jie ieee al Damnusm sine \ajuria? fa Damo Sie Iourhs Lihue Lay recs te Anji ed damage in terms of the money, property and ae or es damage that generally thot generallyconcept of terrible abseque injuries tat cannot be the basis for action. \njuria sine damaum denotes infringement of tee Law without pre justice. A veLetion of Legal rights i€ @ persen is Weld Liable for prosecution, waster or pot that person causes actual damage or Lass te the pLainfe et = \njuria refers to an infringement of the Legally protected interest (ie, rigs). SWINE is an abbreviection for “without” or “absent!” H+ means the some as. ebseque! And the ten DAMMAM refics to actual PrysicaL Lass, whether in tems of health, comfort, MONEY, or service, oe BS Landmark cases of Injuria Sine Damnwma + Bldim Single State of Tammu A Kasbomir asThe apex Court determined MLA Brim Sings democratic ght A awarded him 2s 50000 in compensatory Losses. In addition, the appropriate. PrLice official was penalized or neglect of duty and misconduct, i O-2 DiPRrentiate between Gaasi contract Crime, Contract and Torts, Es a AMZ DiFRerence between tort and contract — e + Tort is an uncodifed Law whereas Contract Law is a codified Law as Incdian contract Law, \€72, ‘Wn tort, there is a duty Rxed by, Low. \n_ contract Lee, chucty is net Pred by Law but is muctaolly — gitn by parties to each other — ‘Wn tort, ducty is towards, every person Whicl is alse known as "viget in rem”. Under contract Law, ucty is only for the parties to thet specife damage sie in contract Law remedy provided Grwarms not just the verti of tect crime _buct ettela whole society Hence it is a pubLic Tort is dealt under civil courtstind crime is dealt under oriminal court AS a result of tect, the remedy given is a compensation which is. unliquidated amage. AS & result of crime, a convict is provided with a ieee gitun uncer IPC and alse fine as per Fabel Aeekico seus email bee see ees poses eae a We Lonme is, aapinst the stote. Tort is private Law and crime is pabLic Law —_DiFRerence between tort and quasiccontract Damages are not xed in the tort Law ie, alse _ i d doy 0 qpasiccontractual obLigation are xed and specified Uae emmcotest SOSrete In tort, duty is imposed oadDiFRerence between contract and crime 10 contract, The injured party bas colby right fr Liquidacte d damages. or actual damages caused fo Wim lo orime, Hae injured party cannot sue for Gamags as this is a crime aapinst society the — weoused will be pact to imprisonment or impased Roe or beth a bPETNAS ob ject of contract Law is +o Protect +he riglets of parties +o a contract, the Objective belrind __eriminal Law is to Provide peace and harmony io Society se i im Mens rea for breach of contract is totally irrelevant whereas Mens rea is Aq _wMpor-tant a aenend in crime = a = st eortract is deal+ under civil court and crime is dealt under criminal court 2 ss BF Explain Negligence as a Tort or as a Crime. A? Neglignnce isa civil tort which scours when a person breaches his Sucty of care which We ond _ te another due to whic that other person suters some hard or underanes some Legal injury,ln Layman's tems, NegLigence can be explained as the failure of discharge. or the omission +0 do \n tort Law negligence can be:The pLaiotifE was taken iLL due to +he part consumption of +he contaminated contents of the bottle. i Me was, held by athe court thot +he manueturer _ — who manufactures, the product fr +he end i ensumee with the assumption Hast with the Lack — of reasonable care in lis part the consumer willPublic Maisance? jc Nuisance is a crime. Accor: ing to Section 2g asian Penal Code, Public Nuisance is a Criminal ofFence. H+ says that A person is guilty of Public nuisance who does any act or is guilt : Hn CAUSES Any common. in Aryare kpown as “General defences’ in the Law of tort, The defences available are gen as Lows: VeLenti nen St in juria or the. defense of ‘Consent’ Nnenttable accident Ret oS cs arr cea Ks (SS Privecte helen setae peaThe conclusions whic came out of this case are? The master of the driver could not be made Liable as it was a case of a sheer accident and the _sctrangers had whantanly grt inte the velsicle. The principle of velenti non St io juria was net Gpplscabliata he ven eis che Sv see babe Leola wd drigh NL Sumner, a PLaintiCe wo ele eines act the boundary of +e arena hor: Sot the plaintife eae. or te whic he got Frightened and AUL into the defendants were not Liable in this case since they lad taken due care and precamtions