Professional Documents
Culture Documents
November 2016
The Redesign Steering Committee would like to thank the Project Officer, Rachael Raleigh for her work on
this project and her workplace Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service Pharmacy Department, for their
support of this project in seconding the Project Officer to this appointment.
The Redesign Steering Committee and Project Officer would like to sincerely thank Dr Andrew Brown, for his
input in developing the primary evidence and assisting the Project Officer in finalising the White Paper. Dr
Brown’s consulting on this project has been invaluable in achieving the deliverables.
As part of the Redesign Steering Committee, Andrew Matthews, (SHPA General Manager - Workforce
Transformation), has been instrumental in facilitating many of the research activities including focus groups,
structured interviews and case studies. His guidance and engagement of the key stakeholders has been
essential for the development of this report.
The development of this report would not have been possible without the enthusiastic participation of several
key stakeholders. The Redesign Steering Committee would also like to especially thank those participants
that were involved in the focus groups, structured interviews and case studies, who volunteered their time
and resources to input into the Redesign Project outcomes. The time and effort given to the development of
this project is very much appreciated.
The SHPA Secretariat has been supportive of the Redesign Project in many administrative and media related
manners. The Project Officer would like to thank them for their ongoing support.
The Redesign Project Steering Committee would also like to acknowledge the work of Rachael Raleigh, as
a Monash University Master of Clinical Pharmacy student and her supervisor Kirstie Galbraith for the
development of the literature review displayed in this report. The literature review was developed by Rachael
as a student requirement under the guidance of Kirstie Galbraith and was completed outside of the project
officer employment.
The practice of hospital pharmacy in Australia is evolving. Economic pressures and increasing healthcare
requirements from patients demand that the health workforce is used effectively and efficiently. The
advancing role of hospital pharmacists is a key driver for discussion around progression of the role of
pharmacy technicians and assistants in the Australian hospital setting as identified at the 2014 SHPA Future
Summit.
As pharmacists progressively move away from dispensary based supply functions and transition to team
based patient-centric roles out of the dispensary, the need to effectively harness the technician and assistant
workforce to support advancing hospital pharmacy services strengthens (2). At the Future Summit a key
outcome focused on expanding the scope of practice of pharmacy technicians and assistants to enable the
development of future models of clinical practice.
Implementation of technology in the pharmacy sector, including dispensing robotics and e-health, add to the
factors influencing the changing roles of the hospital pharmacy workforce in Australia. With technology
advancing and being utilised more broadly, it is important to begin to consider future workforce implications
and anticipate future change to maximise workforce development opportunities.
Further drivers for this work include a realisation that hospital pharmacy technicians and assistants are
underutilised compared to their OECD peers, and acknowledgement that there are only limited opportunities
for those pharmacy technicians and assistants seeking career advancement in Australia.
This report provides some insight into hospital pharmacy technicians and assistants in the Australian health
environment, promoting discussion that will guide SHPA in its role as a professional society in this changing
landscape.
This paper aims to:
Provide a detailed review of the current roles and influencing frameworks in Australia
With consideration of the global context, identify key areas for development in Australia
Consider changes required to enable development
Provide initial options for how SHPA may contribute to the improved utilisation of Australian
hospital pharmacy technicians and assistants
The Redesign Project was undertaken over a 6-month period (at 0.4FTE) from March to August in 2016, with
the content of this report developed from a series of carefully planned activities including: a literature review,
a review of supporting frameworks and primary research (national survey, focus groups, structured interviews
and mini case studies).
Summary: Roles and responsibilities of hospital pharmacy technicians and assistants vary significantly in
Australia with the workforce largely participating in activities focussed on technical tasks rather than patient
focused clinical tasks.
Career structure
o There is concern regarding the lack of career structure of hospital pharmacy technicians and
assistants in Australia.
o Most hospital pharmacy departments have a ‘flat’ personnel structure for pharmacy
technicians/assistants.
o High staff turnover is linked to the lack of career opportunities, which is particularly prevalent
in rural and remote locations.
o Technicians and assistants are interested in career advancement opportunities.
o Lack of training opportunities, limited incentive to undertake training and few opportunities for
progression are reported as major obstacles.
o In some states the ability to establish senior positions are limited by requesting academic
requirements that do not routinely exist as part of the technician/assistant curriculum.
o In hospitals that offer senior pharmacy technician/assistant positions it was consistently noted
that it was difficult to find pharmacy technicians/assistants with the more developed
competencies required for these roles, leading hospitals to seek more highly trained
technicians from the United Kingdom or utilising overseas trained pharmacists for senior roles.
Summary: Limited career structure and the lack of opportunities to advance practice stifle the development
of this workforce in Australia.
Summary: Stakeholder engagement noted the role for SHPA in setting national standards for employment
with respect to the education and training requirements of hospital pharmacy technicians/assistants. In
addition, SHPA could have a role in accrediting qualifications and credentialing individuals that undertake the
qualifications to ensure a consistent quality of practice that meets standards. Extension of this role into an
advanced practice domain for hospital pharmacy technicians and assistants is expected to follow.
Summary: The pharmacy technician and assistant workforce is not regulated nationally, excepting guidelines
and standards from professional bodies that mention pharmacy technicians and assistants but are not
legislatively enforced. Legislative and industrial changes if required are the responsibility of the states and
organisations to which they apply. SHPA can advocate for legislative and industrial change but not be directly
involved in jurisdictional industrial negotiations.
With only 14 professions registered nationally, it is unlikely that pharmacy technicians/assistants will be
considered by health ministers as a workforce requiring registration in the short to medium term. It is possible
for a professional organisation to assume a professional regulatory role of the workforce it represents. This
is performed by many professions including other health professionals such as dietitians. This may include
credentialing of roles, continuing professional development, financial incentives, legislative change and
potential technician registration with legal responsibility and accountability for technicians/assistants.
Regulation via a professional body such as the SHPA would create standardisation and enable development
of hospital pharmacy technicians/assistants. As demonstrated in the UK, advanced technician roles are built
on the foundation of professional regulation and training which resulted in the registration of technicians.
Mandating education and training, accreditation of qualifications and credentialing of individuals will
standardise roles and responsibilities provided across Australia. With appropriate supporting education and
training, the development of roles from a uniform baseline will also create a more structured career path for
hospital pharmacy technicians in Australia. Expansion into advanced practice domains should follow which
will ultimately shift the roles and responsibilities of technicians and assistants across Australia.
Professional bodies will also need to review and update standards and guidelines that support pharmacy
technician/assistant roles and remove statements that obstruct their development in order to advance this
workforce.
The future
There is a strong belief from Australian hospital pharmacy stakeholders that pharmacy
technicians/assistants can have a greater role in technical activities, including the clinical support tasks
within ‘clinical activities’, under existing legislation.
Any development of pharmacy technicians/assistants must involve pharmacists, who may need to be
socialised to the use of pharmacy technicians/assistants as part of the pharmaceutical services team.
Training and education quality, consistency and availability, needs to be improved.
Barriers to development include human resources, sourcing technicians/assistants and the limited number
of full time equivalent positions.
The Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia 9
Significant change is possible under current arrangements at the individual hospital level where the
Director of Pharmacy is able to effectively engage with ‘levers of change’, including the hospital executive,
human resource departments and consider financial implications.
Hospital pharmacy departments are requesting: ‘advocacy tools and management supports’, ‘professional
standards and competencies’, ‘quality standardised education’ and ‘finance’ to assist in pharmacy
technician/assistant role redevelopment.
Key stakeholder feedback was that consistency of regulation was required to allow the same skills to be
developed to grow roles across Australia.
Expanded scope of practice roles for pharmacy technicians/assistants that the Australian hospital
pharmacy workforce would like to engage in include:
o Clinical roles including medication reconciliation, counselling and inpatient unit technician
o Accuracy checking technicians
o Technician led dispensaries
o Research, data collection and education
o Dispensing and imprest management.
Suggested interventions
Significant progress towards greater utilisation of pharmacy technicians/assistants may be achieved with the
following SHPA led interventions:
1. Update current SHPA Standards and workforce definitions available in the SHPA Standards of
Practice for Clinical Pharmacy Services
2. Develop an Australian pharmacy technician/assistant competency standards framework and
explore SHPA’s role in credentialing individuals for defined competency areas from entry level
to advanced level
3. Explore SHPA’s role in improving accreditation and delivery of national qualifications
4. Document current innovative and advanced practice in each jurisdiction and consider SHPA
support required to broaden this level of practice Australia-wide
5. Hospital pharmacy technician/assistant leadership development
Collectively known as Residency, Research and Redesign, these projects recognise future models of clinical
practice as key themes for development by SHPA. Specifically, the SHPA Federal Council determined that
in order to develop new and advanced practice roles in integrated care there is an immediate need to build
capacity in the pharmacist workforce through developing and expanding the scope of practice of pharmacy
technicians and assistants.
To ensure future sustainability, a review of the current roles and frameworks that support hospital pharmacy
technicians and assistants in Australia and overseas was required to identify variations in scope of practice,
opportunities for future development and inform workforce change.
Commissioned by Federal Council in November 2015, the Pharmacy Technician and Assistant Role
Redesign within Australian Hospitals (Redesign) Project, aims to inform this workforce change. The project
included a literature review and consulted a range of stakeholders via survey, focus group, interview and
case study platforms to identify current practices and requirements to enable the development of roles in the
future. The outcomes of the Redesign Project are described by this report.
Further, a realisation that hospital pharmacy technicians and assistants are underutilised compared to their
OECD peers, and acknowledgement that there are only limited opportunities for those technicians and
assistants seeking career advancement in Australia, provide additional drivers to explore the Australian
hospital pharmacy workforce environment.
As pharmacists progressively move away from dispensary based supply functions and transition to team
based patient-centric roles out of the dispensary, the need to effectively harness the technician and assistant
workforce to support advancing hospital pharmacy services strengthens (2). This debate can be seen as a
positive indicator of the progress that the profession has made in clarifying the pharmacist’s role as clinical,
to deliver patient-centred pharmaceutical care.(3)
Implementation of technology in the pharmacy sector, for example dispensing robotics and e-health, add to
the factors influencing the changing roles of the hospital pharmacy workforce in Australia. With this
technology advancing and being utilised more broadly, it is important to begin to consider future workforce
implications and anticipate future change to maximise workforce development opportunities.
This report provides some insight into hospital pharmacy technicians and assistants in the Australian health
environment, promoting discussion that will guide SHPA in its role as a professional society in this changing
landscape.
Exploring and enabling the current hospital pharmacy technician and assistant workforce in Australia to
develop is essential to attain better health outcomes through leading edge pharmacy practice, as we seek to
serve patients in the hospital health care setting. Via empowering the health workforce to evolve, the
Redesign Project epitomises the SHPA core strategic areas that will ultimately enable the realisation of the
SHPA vision, with the understanding that effective and sustainable pharmaceutical services delivery can only
occur when pharmacists work together with pharmacy technicians and assistants.
This paper delivers this aim by engaging key stakeholder via a variety of forums to:
• Provide a detailed review of the current roles and influencing frameworks in Australia
• With consideration of the global context, identify key areas for development in Australia
• Consider changes required to enable development
• Provide initial options for how SHPA may contribute to the improved utilisation of Australian
hospital pharmacy technicians and assistants
This work focuses on hospital pharmacy technicians and assistants only and does not consider those working
outside of the hospital setting. For further details regarding the scope of this project refer to the Terms of
Reference available in Appendix 1.
The content of this Redesign Project report has been gathered from a series of carefully planned activities
as outlined below:
Literature was selected initially via abstract review and included if the article was capable of outlining roles
of hospital pharmacy technicians. Articles and conference proceedings were selected via abstract, and then
full text review and the most relevant references were included in this literature review.
Focus groups, structured interviews and mini case studies were conducted with representatives from around
Australia. See Appendix 2 for location and hospital classification of those involved.
The questions in the national survey were developed by the Project Officer and Steering Committee and were
largely based on the SHPA Standards of Practice for Clinical Pharmacy Services (1), the pharmacy specific
units of the Hospital/Health Services Pharmacy Support National Qualifications and the recently conducted
2016 FIP Global Survey (2).
The survey was delivered electronically via Survey Monkey and each hospital was invited to participate via
email to the Director of Pharmacy at the site. Reminders were sent via email and highlighted in the SHPA
eNews. Participants were required to consent to participate prior to proceeding with the survey completion.
Note: For the purposes of this survey the term technician was synonymous with assistant.
Survey demographics
A total of 154 responses representing more than 170 hospital pharmacies across Australia, were collected,
reflecting a response rate of 56% of the 308 hospital pharmacies invited to participate. Graph 1 shows the
geographical response rate as a percentage of the overall response rate.
28.07%
30.00%
16.96%
20.00%
9.36% 9.36%
10.00% 1.17% 1.75% 1.75%
0.00%
Australian Queensland New South Northern South Tasmania Victoria Western
Capital Wales Territory Australia Australia
Territory
State/Territory
80%
60% 60%
60% 50% 50% 50% 53%
40%
20%
0%
Australian Queensland New South Northern South Australia Tasmania Victoria Western
Capital Wales Territory Australia
Territory
State/Territory
Of the hospitals that responded 86.4% were public, 12.3% were private and 1.3% identified as both public
and private hospitals. Hospital size as described by bed number was well distributed as is shown by Graph
3.
20.0% 16.3%
15.0%
9.8%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
50 or less 51-100 101-200 201-500 501 or more
Total Number of Beds
The Project Officer and the Health Systems Strengthening Consultant facilitated focus groups over a 3-hour
time period using a world café approach to elicit information consistent with the aims above. Each individual
was asked to comment on a series of questions or statements consistent with the themes recognised in the
2016 SHPA Survey. Importantly this activity focused on details specific to the future roles and how SHPA as
an organisation could support the progression of pharmacy technicians and assistants in Australia.
The invited participants represented multiple locations across a variety of roles in Australia 1:
• Pharmacy Board of Australia Representative
• National Pharmacy Technician Network Representative – Public Major City Principal Referral Hospital
[Victoria]
• Director of Pharmacy - Private Inner Regional Acute Group A Hospital [Tasmania]
• Director of Pharmacy - Public Major City Acute Group A Hospital [South Australia]
• Director of Pharmacy - Public Outer Regional Acute Group C Hospital [Queensland]
• Department of Health Representative [Northern Territory]
1
The classification of hospitals is taken from the AIHW Australian Hospitals Peer Groups: see
http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=60129553446
Evidence suggests that the addition of clinical pharmacist services in the inpatient setting results in improved
quality, safety and efficiency of patient care (4). Currently, however in Australian hospitals, not all patients
are seen by a pharmacist. Several studies have shown that utilising pharmacy assistants increases
pharmacist’s time spent on clinical tasks (5-11). Advancing roles of pharmacy technicians and enhanced
utilisation of this workforce is key for the development of hospital pharmacy services in Australia and the
facilitation of pharmacists practising to their full scope (12).
History indicates that progression of the hospital pharmacy technician workforce stems from a complex
interplay of training and regulatory changes over several years (12-14). The United Kingdom exemplifies
some of the more advanced roles technicians are capable of undertaking (15-18). The roles were built on the
foundation of professional regulation and training resulting in a requirement for registration of technicians in
the UK (13, 14). The United States of America (USA) similarly displays trends of advanced technician roles
but lacks standardisation in training and regulatory requirements thus limiting uniform progression of scope
comparative to the UK (5, 6, 14, 19, 20). Australia is elementary in its utilisation of hospital pharmacy
technicians comparative to its overseas counterparts and currently lacks the supporting regulatory and
training frameworks required to progress this workforce across the nation.
Momentum is building in support of progression of hospital pharmacy technician roles in Australia and change
is imminent (21). A review of the current roles of hospital pharmacy technicians in Australian and overseas
is required to identify variations and future scope of practice to inform workforce change and ensure optimal
outcomes and sustainability into the future.
This literature review aims to give an overview of the current roles that hospital pharmacy technicians
undertake overseas and in Australia, comment on the main differences and provides context for the
development of this workforce in Australia.
4.1 Overview
Traditional roles for hospital pharmacy technicians include technical tasks such as maintaining a
pharmaceutical imprest, packing pharmaceutical products, assisting with the dispensing process and
compounding pharmaceuticals (7, 12, 18-20, 22-29). In Australia these technical tasks are supported by on
the job training and the voluntary completion of Australian Qualifications, provided by the Vocational
Education and Training (VET) sector (30). The two main qualifications for hospital pharmacy technicians that
outline these traditional roles are the Certificate III and IV in Hospital/Health Services Pharmacy Support (30).
Table 1: Pharmacy specific units of the Hospital/Health Services Pharmacy Support Certificates, outlines the
hospital pharmacy specific units and roles that technicians are trained to complete through these national
qualifications (30). It additionally outlines specific literature demonstrating the completion of these roles by
technicians around the world.
Ever expanding requirements for clinical pharmacy services and finite resources from which we are able to
provide these services, has led to the development of technician roles to include clinical task provision. The
Society of Hospital Pharmacists Australia (SHPA) outlines standards for the provision of clinical pharmacy
services via the pharmacy technician workforce (28). Although not formal qualifications, these national
professional standards outline clinical support tasks deemed appropriate for completion by trained hospital
The need for advancement of pharmacy technician roles has long been recognised overseas in Europe
particularly in the United Kingdom and North America (13, 14, 31). Improvements in training and regulation
of hospital pharmacy technicians overseas have supported more advanced roles with technicians becoming
increasingly involved in more advanced technical and clinical task provision including checking and
medication history taking roles (5, 6, 12, 17-20, 23-27, 29, 32).
The additional roles pharmacy technicians have been reported to complete in the literature reviewed are
outlined by Table 3: Additional hospital pharmacy technician roles outlined in the literature. As is evidenced
by Table 3, some Australian hospitals employ in house training to facilitate performance of roles outside the
scope of those previously mentioned (7, 10, 33).
Advancements beyond the scope demonstrated by these Australian studies to that of our overseas
counterparts will require a national approach but at present Australia lacks the infrastructure in training and
regulation to develop such roles. Additionally, current recommendations from the Pharmacy Board of
Australia (PBA) and Society of Hospital Pharmacists Australia (SHPA) respectively, state that technician
workforce roles ‘must be limited to activities that do not require professional judgement or discretion’ (34)
and ‘activities that require clinical judgement such as listening to patients, assessing treatment or counselling
patients are not to be undertaken by pharmacy assistants and technicians’ (28). At this point in time these
statements and the lack of standardised training and regulatory frameworks supporting the development of
this workforce obstruct national implementation of extended roles hospital pharmacy technicians undertake
overseas.
Technicians overseas have advanced substantially in clinical task provision too, having been found to be
effective in obtaining and documenting medication histories and performing the process of medication
reconciliation (25, 29). This process involves obtaining a precise and actual medication list which may require
patient, relative, carer and general practitioner interviews, the review of personal electronic medication
profiles and/or patient notes to reconcile differences (16). Given that we know incomplete medication histories
obtained on hospital admission are responsible for more than 25% of prescribing errors (16) and not all
Furthermore, evidence to support clinical technician roles on inpatient units has been described by several
international papers (8, 15, 17). The presence of clinical technicians on inpatients units has a positive impact
on clinical pharmacy service provision and patient care as is shown by a statistically significant increase
(P=0.001) in pharmacist interventions when working with a technician (38). In the intensive care setting
clinical pharmacy technicians reduced the time required for a pharmacist to review a patient by undertaking
tasks such as patient data collection, screening and tracking patient progress, therapeutic drug monitoring,
adverse drug reaction reporting and ward based troubleshooting (8). The assistance of a technician with
these tasks increased the number of patients reviewed by the pharmacist each day (8). Given that clinical
pharmacist services in the inpatient setting result in improved quality, safety and efficiency of patient care (4),
using pharmacy technicians to increase pharmacist time allocated to direct patient care is important for
patient outcomes. Another study similarly found such roles spared pharmacist time by reducing the number
of phone calls to the dispensary by 60% and reducing the weekend workload by 23% (15).
The United States of America is not as advanced as the UK in terms of regulation and training. There is no
mandatory registration requirement (14) and as such less standardisation of technician roles exists across
the country. The formation of the Pharmacy Technician Certification Board (PTCB) in 1995 began formal
regulation of pharmacy technicians, however states have the option to opt-in (14, 19, 31). Certification is
voluntary but has still been instrumental in the expansion of pharmacy technician roles in the USA (14, 19).
The 2013 USA Pharmacy Practice Model Summit outlined key recommendations to advance technician
practice including the development of a defined scope of practice, uniform national standards of education
and training, mandatory certification and licensing (12). At present, certification requirements differ between
states and are not mandatory in the USA thus limiting the uniform expansion of technician roles (19, 31).
USA also has several pharmacy technician specific professional associations e.g. the National Pharmacy
Technician Association who advocate for the advancement of technician roles (14). Pharmacy technician
registration is also required in other countries including: Canada, Denmark and Singapore (2).
It is known that some Australian technicians exceed the scope defined by Table 1 and 2 and reflect the scope
of practice of overseas hospital pharmacy technicians with in-house training but without formal frameworks
in education, training and regulation, these individuals are not representative of the mass (21). Table 3 further
highlights the limited involvement of Australian hospital pharmacy technicians in advanced scope of practice
roles as reported in the literature.
Specifically, the minimal involvement in clinical roles and expanded scope of practice roles as described
overseas is supported by an Australian study of the sub-acute aged care setting from 2012 (22, 43). Elliott et
al found that clinical activities such as assisting with medication history and reconciliation, medication chart
reviews and screening or documenting laboratory test results were roles rarely completed by a technician
(22, 43).
The more advanced roles technicians are reported to complete in Australian hospitals are primarily completed
as part of clinical inpatient unit or ward role with many Australian articles supporting the use of technicians in
this setting (7, 9-11). Leversha et al described the role of a ward pharmacy technician in non-clinical tasks in
2001 (11). Tasks included identification of patients admitted in previous 24 hours, photocopying drug charts,
asking the patient about medication supply, annotating medication charts with location of medicines, ensuring
non-imprest medication supply and referral of any questions to the clinical pharmacist (11). Turner et al
expanded on these tasks and described additional clinical tasks technicians could be involved in suggesting
ward pharmacy technician can effectively assist a pharmacist in achieving optimum clinical care for patients
(7). Seaton et al further demonstrated the advantage of using a ward pharmacy technician to facilitate
medication delivery, describing the technician role in identifying discrepancies between medication orders
and items in the bedside drawers and notifying the clinical pharmacist (10). The incidence of missed doses
decreased significantly from 7.9-8.9% to 0% post the implementation of the technician roles in medication
delivery, realising a cost saving of 5-11% of the net ward costs per quarter (10).
Elliott et al have further outlined ward pharmacy technician tasks and additionally demonstrated their
importance in the provision of clinical pharmacy services in 2014 (9). Tasks completed by the technician
included assisting with individual patient medication supply, screening medication charts for changes,
assisting with medication reconciliation and recording laboratory data for review by the pharmacist (9).
Specific to the inpatient setting, Elliot et al showed that the implementation of an inpatient unit pharmacy
technician role in an Australian hospital increased the pharmacist time spent on clinical tasks from 58% to
73.9% (P<0.0001) (9). In an average working day (7.6 hours) that equates to an additional 1.2 hours per day
spent on clinical activities. Time released by pharmacy technician utilisation has also been shown to increase
the number of patients seen by a pharmacist (8, 9). This study also showed an increase in the median number
of pharmacist interventions (9). In addition to improving clinical pharmacy service availability, inpatient unit
technician roles have been reported to improve unit satisfaction with clinical pharmacy services & individual
staff satisfaction (7).
2. Pack products 4. Complete packaging process (7, 9-11, 22, (15, 17) (8, 14, 20,
33, 43, 45) 23, 46)
HLTPHA003 Assist with dispensing of 1. Accept order for dispensing 3. Prepare for labelling of meds. ✔ ✔ ✔
prescription and medication 2. Ensure clinical evaluation by 4. Assemble items (7, 9-11, 22, (15, 17) (8, 14, 20,
orders pharmacist 5. Finalise dispensing of medicine 33, 43, 45) 23, 46)
HLTPHA004 Order, maintain and distribute 1. Procure stock 5. Dispatch orders ✔ ✔ ✔
pharmaceutical stock 2. Process new stock 6. Process returned stock (7, 9-11, 22, (15, 17) (8, 14, 20,
3. Handle and maintain stock 7. Assist in stocktaking procedures 33, 43, 45) 46)
4. Select and pack item order
HLTPHA005 Conduct small scale 1. Source information on formula 5. Complete production process ✔ ✔ ✔
compounding and labelling of 2. Prepare for production process 6. Participate in quality control (33) (47) (8, 14, 20,
pharmaceutical products 3. Obtain equipment and supplies 7. Store and transport released 27, 46)
4. Compound products product
HLTPHA006 Provide assistance in 1. Perform dispensing administration 3. Process pharmaceutical benefits ✔ ✔ ✔
dispensary administration tasks claims (7, 22, 33, (17) (14, 20, 46,
2. Maintain dispensary information 45) 48)
HLTPHA007 Conduct small – scale 1. Source information on formula 6. Compound products using ✔ ✔ ✔
Certificate IV only
compounding and labelling of 2. Prepare for production process aseptic techniques (33) (47) (8, 14, 20,
aseptic pharmaceutical 3. Obtain equipment and supplies 7. Complete production process 46)
products 4. Prepare for sterile manufacturing 8. Participate in quality control
5. Prepare for cytotoxic production 9. Store & transport released prod
HLTPHA008 Support pharmacist 1. Identify client information needs 4. Collect information and provide to ✔ ✔ ✔
communication with clients 2. Gather and prepare information to meet other health professionals (7, 10, 22, (17) (46)
and other health professionals client needs 5. Confirm that client information 33, 45)
3. Provide specific or prepared needs have been met
information to clients
HLTPHA009
Support pharmacists in the 1. Identify and address requirements for
3. Present workplace data and ✔ ✔ ✔
collection and presentation of data and information collection information (7, 9, 22, 33) (17) (8, 20, 46)
workplace data and 2. Prepare data and information for use
information
*Note the number of references is not representative of the frequency of completion, merely the references in this review that support the tasks completion by hospital pharmacy technicians.
As mentioned previously, national qualifications and professional standards for hospital pharmacy
technicians do exist in Australia, however they are not mandatory (28, 30, 33, 39). Differences in
individual hospital requirements for employment of pharmacy technicians has arisen from a lack of
regulation of the pharmacy technician workforce. Across Australian hospitals, there are no mandatory
minimum qualifications or performance criteria. This ultimately creates a workforce with limited ability
to progress, and little ability for transference of skill across sites due to a lack of standardisation in
roles across Australia.
Technicians are interested in career advancement opportunities but previously, a lack of training
opportunities has been reported as a major obstacle to technician progression (22, 53). Positively, a
series of papers reviewing the Australian hospital pharmacy workforce has found that the number of
hospital pharmacy technicians with a formal qualification is gradually increasing from less than 40%
in 2003, to over 50% in 2007, with the most recent survey in 2012 of 214 hospital pharmacy
technicians in Australia reporting 93% were currently undertaking or held a relevant formal
qualification (33, 39, 41). Creating some form of mandatory baseline skill requirement for employment
in Australian Hospitals will be crucial to transition this workforce into more complex roles.
4.4 Discussion
It is clear that hospital pharmacy technicians have a broad array of roles across the world (see Tables
1 – 3). The importance of their role for the delivery of hospital pharmacy services and quality patient
care has been outlined by several studies (5-11, 32, 38). Australia is less advanced in comparison to
other areas of the world in its utilisation of the pharmacy technician workforce in the hospital setting.
It is clear that the scope of practice of Australian hospital pharmacy technicians can be developed as
evidenced by our overseas counterparts (14, 16, 17, 23, 26).
Key to the regulation of this workforce in Australia would be the involvement of a regulatory agency
equivalent to the General Pharmaceutical Council in the UK (13). In Australia, an example agency
that could assume these regulatory functions is the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency
(AHPRA) (54). AHPRA is responsible for regulating health professionals in the public interest via the
implementation of the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme (50), which at present does
not encompass the pharmacy technician workforce. It could be argued that the missing link between
AHPRA and pharmacy technicians in Figure 1 could be key to the development of regulatory support
pharmacy technicians require to advance their profession.
With only 14 professions registered nationally, it is unlikely that pharmacy technicians will be
considered by health ministers as a workforce requiring registration in the short to medium term. It is
possible though, for a professional organisation to assume a professional regulatory role through
credentialing and accreditation of the workforces it represents. This is already performed by many
professions including other health professionals such as dietitians. The adoption of this regulatory
role by a professional body is an alternative approach that could provide the required support to
enable the development of pharmacy technicians.
Professional bodies will also need to review and update standards and guidelines that support
pharmacy technician roles and remove statements that obstruct their development in order to advance
this workforce.
It is evident from this review that technicians are important to the provision of pharmacy services to
patients in Australian hospitals and can be instrumental in increasing availability and impact of these
services (5-11, 38). Change is necessary to support the development of roles completed by Australian
hospital pharmacy technicians and expand their scope of practice to that of overseas hospital
pharmacy technicians.
5 Overview of State and Territory variation
The Commonwealth of Australia is a federal system, with powers divided between the central
government and individual states and territories. Governance concerning health services delivery is
complex in this system. Hospital care has a further degree of complexity with state and territory
authorities responsible for public hospitals while the private hospital system is funded through a
‘backbone’ of federally funded services including the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS).
The profession of a pharmacist is overseen by a national pharmacy board with federal consistency
aligning state legislation (in the most part). In comparison, the practice of pharmacy comes under the
jurisdiction of varying state and territory based legislation with the roles and responsibilities of hospital
pharmacy technicians and assistants varying significantly across the Commonwealth.
In addition to varying state and territory legislation governing the practice of pharmacy (distribution,
dispensing and administration of medicine), each state and territory has a different legal instrument
(award, enterprise agreement etc.) which defines the name, role, career structure, education
requirements and remuneration of hospital pharmacy technicians and/or assistants with a focus on
the public health sector. Each private entity in Australia additionally has its own legal instrument,
creating more variation within states and territories (education is discussed in more detail later in this
report). This disparity between states means some states/territories utilise only pharmacy assistants,
others only pharmacy technicians whilst some employ both assistants and technicians in their
hospitals. These complexities are compounded by the fact that the assistant classification in one state
is not necessarily equivalent to an assistant classification in another, for example in the public sector
in Queensland an assistant - advanced classified as an OO4 based on qualification requirements
could be equivalent to a technician level 2 in the Victorian or New South Wales public sector (55, 56).
These structures have developed independently in each state and territory with significant differences
and limited similarities. Unlike the pharmacist workforce, the pharmacy technician and assistant
workforce is not regulated nationally, excepting guidelines and standards from professional bodies
that mention pharmacy technicians and assistants but are not legislatively enforced. In many ways
the Commonwealth of Australia could be considered as ‘eight countries’ when considering the role
and careers of hospital pharmacy technicians and assistants. Due to this substantial variation a lack
of understanding exists within the profession and creates difficulty in the transferring of employees
between states and territories.
The absence of a common definition of hospital pharmacy technicians and assistants underlies the
apparent lack of identity for this workforce which has been described more clearly for the pharmacist
workforce but is less well studied in the technician and assistant workforce (2). In Australia, community
pharmacy is seen as a separate career stream for pharmacy technicians/assistants which adds
another layer of complexity for employees seeking to make a career as a pharmacy
technician/assistant.
The Board does provide guidance to pharmacists in response to what is in the public interest with
regard to the practice of pharmacists. Any guidance the Board publishes is in the broader context of
the practice of the profession e.g. as described in practice standards such as those developed by
professional organisations.
It is this ‘autonomy’ that reflects the varied structures and use of pharmacy technicians/assistants
across different hospitals within the same state or territory jurisdiction. It is these same Directors of
Pharmacy that will be the most significant ‘levers of change’ as the pharmacy workforce evolves into
the future.
25
20
15
10
5
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Respondent Number
A series of questions related to roles pharmacy technicians and assistants undertake in the hospital
pharmacy context were asked in relation to three key areas – clinical, technical and retail. The
questions relating to clinical roles were developed based on the SHPA Standards of Practice for
Clinical Pharmacy Services, the questions related primarily to technical roles were developed with
reference to the Hospital/Health Services Pharmacy Support Certificates available in Australia and
the questions related to retail services were developed with reference to the Quality Care Pharmacy
Program (QCPP) (57).
There is a large variation of technical activities undertaken by pharmacy technicians/assistants in
Australian hospitals with some hospitals utilising pharmacy technicians/assistants more widely and
with greater responsibilities than others. This is highlighted further in the mini case studies presented
in this report.
Rural and remote environments pose particular challenges for the delivery of pharmaceutical services
in Australia with pharmacy technicians/assistants playing a significant role which is being further
explored in Queensland, Northern Territory and Western Australia.
Clinical: Activities described by the SHPA Standards of Practice for Clinical Pharmacy
Services
Chapter 12: Pharmacy Assistants and Technicians supporting Clinical Pharmacy Services (Appendix
3) of the Standards of Practice for Clinical Pharmacy Services describes a series of activities related
The respondents that indicated provision of the clinical activity by their hospital pharmacy were then
asked to indicate whether pharmacy technicians were involved in the provision of specific activities
forming that clinical activity by answering: yes, no or unsure. Figure 2 represent the responses
collected. The overwhelming presence of yellow in Figure 2, representative of the response: no;
illustrates the limited involvement of Australian hospital pharmacy technicians in the support of clinical
activity provision.
Even those roles endorsed by the SHPA (See Appendix 3) as suitable for appropriately trained
technicians and assistants are seldom performed by this workforce. It is clear from these results that
hospital pharmacy services are clinically focussed. However as is shown by Figure 2, delivery of
clinical activities is clearly not a focus of the pharmacy technician and assistant workforce.
These results were further supported through the structured interviews and focus groups which also
noted that hospital pharmacy technicians/assistants do not engage in ‘clinical activities’. For the
purpose of this report ‘clinical activities’ were defined as: activities that require a degree of judgement
such as listening to patients, assessing treatment or counselling patients [for example medication
reconciliation, provision of medicines information to patients and assessing patients to self-medicate]
(1).
Of note is that SHPA and selected hospitals break down ‘clinical activities’ undertaken by pharmacists
into sub activities that would be considered clinical support activities. For example, medication
reconciliation is classified as a ‘clinical activity’ but the sub activities of contacting the community
pharmacy and patient’s doctor to have information sent to the hospital and entered into the hospital
software, are clinical support activities, with the pharmacist completing the final verification of the
clinical activity in its entirety.
In contrast to their community counterparts, who engage in routine Pharmacy Medicines and primary
health care counselling, current SHPA Standards clearly indicate that no counselling should be
performed by the hospital pharmacy technician/assistant workforce (1). Pharmacy
technicians/assistants moving between industries find this unusual. The complexity of health care in
the hospital setting is a reason often given for this variation.
Consistent with the literature review completed, Australian hospitals utilise the pharmacy technician
and assistant workforce for traditional technical roles. Interestingly, out of the 9 hospital specific units
in the Hospital/Health Services Qualifications only 3 units indicated a performance rate by the hospital
pharmacy service less than 90%. The activities ‘pack pharmaceutical products, conduct small scale
compounding and labelling of pharmaceutical products and conduct small scale compounding and
labelling of aseptic pharmaceutical products’, were provided by 78.4%, 64.7% and 43.6% of hospital
pharmacy services respectively. This could indicate a shift towards outsourcing such activities in
Australian hospitals.
The unit activity described as ‘Communicate with clients and other health professionals’ has large
similarities with some of the tasks described by the SHPA Standards of Practice for Clinical Pharmacy
Services and supports the notion that hospital pharmacy technicians and assistants in Australia have
limited involvement in speaking directly to the patient or other health care professionals. This is
exemplified by the low percentage involvement of pharmacy technicians and assistants in the
provision of this activity and its elements.
The structured interviews and focus groups noted ‘dispensing’, ‘imprest and ward supply’ and ‘sterile
manufacture’ as the most common technical roles for hospital pharmacy technicians/assistants.
Limited or no training and no incentive for training was highlighted as a current limitation. Participants
who had previous exposure to ‘customers’ in the community pharmacy setting or a wider scope of
practice (experience in the United Kingdom), felt under-utilised and uninspired by their current career,
while pay scales limited the ability to award high achievers.
High staff turnover was not noted as an issue during focus group discussions. The structured
interviews revealed that in more rural and remote environments it was more difficult to obtain suitably
skilled staff.
The lack of consistency of pharmacy technician/assistant roles between hospitals makes it difficult for
employees to move between institutions and to have their competencies recognised. In some states
the ability to establish senior positions may be limited by requesting academic requirements that do
not routinely exist as part of the technician/assistant curriculum. For example, in NSW the award
requires Level 4 technicians to hold a management qualification.
In hospitals that offered senior pharmacy technician/assistant positions it was consistently noted that
it was difficult to find pharmacy technicians/assistants with the more developed competencies
required for these roles with hospitals seeking more highly trained technicians from the United
Kingdom or utilising overseas trained pharmacists for senior roles.
The mini case studies highlight that senior pharmacy technician roles have been developed by some
pharmacy departments in such areas as education and dispensary managers but these positions
would be considered unusual. In some states senior pharmacy technician levels are noted in the
enterprise agreement but these posts are not developed in practice due to limitations in funding and
a limited understanding by human resources departments of the role and function of such positions.
Most hospital pharmacy departments have a ‘flat’ personnel structure for pharmacy
technicians/assistants and utilise roster rotations which may limit opportunities for specialisation.
In the hospital pharmacy stream HLT37115 - Certificate III in Hospital/Health Services Pharmacy
Support and HLT47115 - Certificate IV in Hospital/Health Services Pharmacy Support are the
qualifications offered.
RTOs obtain approval (scope) from the Federal Department of Education and Training to deliver
qualifications according to the approved qualification outline. RTOs are free to interpret the content of
the courses against the approved ‘competency’ areas as outlined in the curriculum. There are
currently four organisations registered to deliver Certificate III and IV in Hospital/Health Services
Pharmacy Support. Two offer these courses through a distance mode Australia wide:
Box Hill Institute Polytechnic TEI
Stanborough Wemyss Contracting Pty Ltd
One provides Certificate IV to Western Australia residents only:
North Metropolitan TAFE
And the final is registered to provide both Certificates to New South Wales residents only but is
currently not actually providing the course
TAFE NSW - Western Institute
Although there is a national education system in Australia, the education requirements of hospital
pharmacy technicians and assistants are set by state and territory based legislation and enterprise
agreements. There is currently no consistency across states and territories in this regard. For example
in comparing Queensland, Victoria and South Australia it is noted that The Queensland Health Drugs
and Poisons Regulation 1996 (legislation) determines that a hospital pharmacy assistant must have
a VET qualification under the National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Act 2011
recognising that the person has the skills and knowledge required to perform pharmaceutical imprest
Where states and territories do not mandate the need for minimum education requirements there is
no driver for these courses to be undertaken, but rather a reliance on ‘in house’ credentialing
programs.
Structured interviews and focus groups noted concern regarding the varied quality of delivery of
currently available certificate courses and perceived weakness in approaches to assessment. With a
call for the development of more practical skills and face to face leaning opportunities providing more
‘fit for purpose’ competencies. The lack of face to face learning, interaction with pharmacists and
workplace environments were noted as concerns.
Where hospital pharmacy departments engaged in the Certificate III and IV courses it was noted that
significant engagement of local senior technicians and assistants or pharmacist mentors was required
to enable course completion to a level seen as appropriate for that hospital.
There is a general recognition that the curriculum of current course offerings provided a very basic
introduction to the skills and knowledge required to work in the hospital environment. Current
education approaches do not cover some of the more advanced managerial roles undertaken by
senior pharmacy technicians.
‘What is currently missing is judgment and clinical reasoning; a diploma or other qualification would
be required to develop these competencies.’ Quote from structured interviews
In house credentialing is usually institution specific which limits the ability of technicians/assistants to
have these skills recognised in other hospitals. Discussions have been underway in South Australia
and Western Australia to develop methods to recognise credentialing between hospitals (a learning
passport approach).
For private hospitals Certificate III and Certificate IV in Community Pharmacy is preferred as supply
is underpinned by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) in this sector. Currently, Certificate III
and Certificate IV in Hospital Health Services Pharmacy Support include limited PBS competence.
The following prioritised suggestions for improving pharmacy technician/assistant education and
training were noted from the focus groups:
Both the focus groups and structured interviews noted the role for SHPA in setting national standards
for the use of pharmacy technicians/assistants with supporting accredited training that meets
consistent standards. SHPA has a major role to play in addressing some of the above suggestions to
enable the development of this workforce.
‘Technicians can’t be undervalued. A good technician is a valuable person to have in the workplace.
There is no doubt that their role can be expanded. There needs to be structure around
advancement.’ Quote from structured interview
Additional comments regarding hospital pharmacy technicians in Australia largely revolved around
the need for standardisation across sites and the country, fixed nationwide training, with consistency
of roles and consistency of regulation to allow the same skills to be developed to grow roles. Another
key theme was the requirement to progress this workforce to enable the progression of the pharmacist
role in hospitals again linking back to the initial evolution of the Redesign Project.
Culturally there was significant emphasis from both structured interviews and focus groups that any
development of technician roles must involve taking pharmacists technicians/assistants and other
stakeholders on the journey. Many pharmacists are not aware of the potential of technicians and are
familiar with a working culture where they take full responsibility. A subset of pharmacists and
technicians/assistants will be resistant to changing roles and will be content with their current roles
and responsibilities. This needs to be balanced against the desire to progress pharmacy
technician/assistant roles by those wishing to advance pharmacist roles and those motivated to
improve the career prospects for technicians and assistants.
Participants also noted the influence of new technology and the broader concepts of redesigning staff
skills mix, not only in the pharmacy department but across the hospital, as factors that could influence
the development of pharmacy technician/assistant roles.
These case studies highlight the importance of well-trained pharmacy assistants and technicians
across a range of hospitals in Australia. Study sites were selected based on geographical location,
AIWH Peer Group Classification and survey response to ensure representation across a range of
Australian hospitals (58).
These sites demonstrate advanced utilisation of this workforce and all describe similar challenges in
progressing the role of pharmacy technicians and assistants across Australia.
Overview
The Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital is a 900 bed tertiary referral teaching hospital with 2.5
pharmacists to one assistant/ technician. The pharmacy assistant team operate in various
dispensaries/satellites across the hospital and in some locations are responsible for all the workflow
that takes place. These locations are imprest area (stock picked and prepared all on site), controlled
drug vault, clinical trials satellite, mental health centre outpatient pharmacy, cancer care outpatient
pharmacy, cancer care aseptic production unit, women’s and newborns satellite, general medical and
surgical satellite and the main outpatient pharmacy.
The RBWH has advanced scope pharmacy assistant positions that are relatively new. These positions
can work in the areas listed in above but these pharmacy assistants have undertaken further
education to work in higher skilled roles, these are;
Ambulatory services for Chronic Kidney Disease patients and cancer care patients reviewing
own medicines and gathering information from primary care community pharmacies and
nursing homes for review and interpretation by clinical pharmacists
Project support for implementation of service redesign re drug supply: Direct to ward delivery
and implementation of automated medication distribution systems
Ward based assistant funded by service lines, cancer care, internal medicine and renal
medicine. Operating on the wards, with patient interaction and medication supply being a
strong objective. This role ensures that Pharmacists are given more time to conduct better
clinical services.
Education and training assistant that operates at 0.5per week (the other 0.5 is ward based).
This role works closely with the senior pharmacy assistant team leader to support the assistant
team with best practice initiatives for the technical workflow. Facilitates in creating and
maintaining individual portfolios, as well as conducting strong orientation for new and existing
employees.
Pharmacist/assistant interaction
Pharmacists supervise daily workload of satellite/dispensary based assistants and ward based
assistants but senior technician is responsible for recruitment, development, liaison with pharmacy
team leaders.
The lack of opportunity to embark in further education at a certificate III and IV level in hospital
pharmacy services is a big concern. The desire for career progression is a big focus for the pharmacy
assistant team and is actively supported by all parts in the RWBH pharmacy department however;
there is a lack of education available to provide this. Many jobs (especially the advance scope
positions) are given to staff that have better education and experience behind them and they are
usually from the UK. It is very disheartening that pharmacy assistants who have commenced
employment in Australia are not able to access the same type of learning. The future of the pharmacy
assistant/technician workforce has the potential to create stronger skillsets that aren’t at a pharmacist
clinical level but would greatly assist in pharmacists’ time management to provide better service
delivery. The feedback from many pharmacy assistants is that they want that opportunity but
unfortunately are not able to access it but it can be seen that opportunity exists outside Australia.
Overview
The Port Augusta Hospital pharmacy services up to 80 acute beds with paediatric, obstetric,
gynaecological, surgical, emergency unit and general medical units. Satellite Renal dialysis centre
(36 patients) and oncology services (6 chairs). Staffing consists of 4 FTE pharmacists, 3 FTE
technicians and 1 FTE intern pharmacist. Outreach service (clinical and distribution) provision to a
number of smaller hospitals within region.
Innovative roles pharmacy technicians are utilised for included outreach service provision.
Technicians assist to maintain adequate stock levels, ordering quantities and storage advice to
remote outreach clinics. Where appropriate they also visit remote sites to maintain stock holding
requirements and monitor storage conditions. They assist with medication profile maintenance for
patients in remote sites (such as Oodnadatta and Marree). General enquiry answering particularly
with regard to access to medications remotely (with referral to Pharmacists as well) is also completed
by the technician.
Pharmacist/technician interaction
The pharmacists and technicians work collaboratively to provide supportive services with dispensing
and distribution. They provide advice on alternative stock availability and costing where appropriate.
They support monitoring renal dialysis unit patient adherence and follow up required prescriptions etc.
from offsite nephrologists to ensure continuity of care. Monitoring of ward medication distribution
systems, medication expiry and usage with particular attention to minimising wastage and maximising
cost efficiency of medications utilised.
Education requirements
Training is provided in the form of online SA Health training, dispensing training (ad Hoc), medication
profile maintenance training (train-the-trainer), NPS high risk medicines training on line, cytotoxic
handling and dispensing training (on line modules) and clinical handover training.
Acknowledge the need to conduct projects on technicians working in rural hospital settings due to the
multi-task nature of their role and expanding scope of practice. There is no formal training pathway
for career progression and technical staff are limited in how they can advance their career.
Overview
Calvary Public Hospital Bruce comprises a 256 bed general hospital as well as a 19 bed hospice –
located off the main campus. We are a teaching hospital of the Australian National University, The
University of Canberra and the Australian Catholic University. The Hospital is funded by ACT Health
Directorate and managed by the Little Company of Mary Health Care.
The hospital provides a range of inpatient, ambulatory care and outreach facilities and services. Our
inpatient services include: Emergency medicine, Intensive Care, Cardiology, Hospital in the Home,
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ophthalmology, Cardiology, Head and neck surgery, Orthopaedics,
Anaesthetics, Plastics, Endocrinology, Neonatology, Maternity services, Mental Health, Ear, nose and
throat, Neurology, Respiratory, Gastroenterology, Rheumatology, General medicine, Urology,
General surgery, and Oncology.
Within the Pharmacy Department there are 28 FTE positions, of which 20 are pharmacist positions
and 6.5 are technical officer positions (including our purchasing officer) and 1 ASO position. Pharmacy
services to the hospital include ward clinical pharmacy services, patient counselling and continuum
of care management, participation in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation education, pharmacotherapy
education sessions for hospital staff, aseptic manufacturing services, clinical trials, individual patient
dispensing for non-imprest stock, ward imprest supplies, an AMS program and some outpatient
dispensing. The aseptic dispensing service is provided using the Department’s aseptic room and
laminar flow cabinet, with formulation of total parenteral nutrition (TPN), and other IV additives
including epidural dose forms.
This role is based on a project from 2011, a prospective, two-phase, observational analysis of time
invested by a pharmacist performing ward duties was conducted over two five-week intervals. Phase
one data was collected when a pharmacy technician was not present on the ward. A pharmacy
technician was then trained for three weeks to conduct ward duties which included medication supply,
pathology screening and discharge facilitation and planning. Phase two was conducted with the
presence of a ward-based technician for two hours each day. Time-activity ratios were recorded.
Interventions and their severity were recorded in accordance with SHPA classification of pharmacy
interventions. This project showed an increase in time spent by the pharmacist on medication history
taking (+7%), discharge (+6.6%), clinical review (+5.4%), liaising with Medical officers (+3.6%) and
patient counselling (+1.8%) during phase two. A decrease of 23.4% was seen in time spent by the
pharmacist on medication supply. A 47% increase in interventions was achieved when a technician
was present, and 82% of all phase 2 interventions were related to therapeutic or prescribing
recommendations compared to 18% relating to cost and formulary issues. Moderate and major (level
3 and 4) interventions made by the pharmacist increased by 28% during phase two. This was
presented at a Medicines Management conference (both paper and poster).
Pharmacist/assistant interaction
All technical activity (dispensing, imprest, pre-packing, ward duties) has some level of pharmacist
oversight or final check. Technicians label and prepare all dispensed/pre-packed medications before
a final check by the pharmacist. Ward technicians work closely with their ward pharmacist to
determine individual patient supply quantities and in the identification of some medication related
issues (i.e. in appropriate prescription, re-write errors, non-formulary stock). Technicians manage all
hospital imprest levels, however items kept on imprest are managed by the formulary pharmacist.
Stock holdings for the pharmacy are jointly determined by the purchasing office/data manager and
the formulary pharmacist. Aseptic items are made and labelled by the technician before a final check
by the pharmacist. Other clinical duties such as medication order review, prescriber liaison, and
patient education are undertaken by a pharmacist.
Education requirements
There are no formal educational requirements required to be employed as a technician at our site.
Holding a certificate III or IV in hospital pharmacy practice is highly desirable.
Technicians undertaking our ward role are credentialed before undertaking ward duties. This
credentialing is done by our senior technician (TO2). See credentialing document below. The
technician being trained observes the duties being undertaken before a period of supervised work
and then final credentialing.
The current shortage of experienced, hospital trained pharmacists has had a huge impact on our
staffing levels, as well as the training and induction burden of new pharmacist staff with little or no
hospital pharmacy experience. Technicians being able to undertake extra duties on the ward
(medication counselling, medication history taking), may alleviate some of these issues.
In the Dispensary
Print patient bed lists from ACTPAS
Liaise with ward pharmacist over pending discharges / transferring patients
Check medication tubs for ward deliveries
On the Ward
Communicate appropriately with ward staff –
‘I am the Pharmacy Technician checking which medications need supplying. You will need to ask / get
advice from your clinical pharmacist’.
Correctly interpret the ward journey boards
Locate accurate information of ward imprests either from the medication room, hard copy or iPharmacy
Sort medications from pharmacy into the correct patient tubs
Identify and return medications not dispensed to patients currently on the ward
Ordering Medications
Locate patient medication charts in the nurses’ station, from wall racks and in the medication room
Correctly match the patient name between the selected chart, medication tub and bed list
Match each medication order with current stock from the patient’s tub
Calculate the quantity to be ordered from pharmacy by subtracting the current quantity on ward from
quantity needed.
Order pharmacy supply medications using numbered sticky labels without covering relevant information
locate the ward multi-device machine and email relevant medication charts to pharmacy using the email
shortcut for dispensary@calvary-act.com.au
Overview
The Norwest Private Hospital services 204 beds with clinical pharmacy services provided to areas
such as emergency, intensive care, coronary care, cardiology, medical, surgical, orthopaedics,
maternity & special care nursery units. The pharmacist to technician ratio in the hospital is 1.5 to 1.
The technical roles that pharmacy assistants/technicians undertake include, dispense, Imprest
management, Inventory management, Drug distribution, Deliveries, PBS prescription and claim
management, Hospital Store/Supply Department Liaison, Account and Billing management & support.
Clinical roles provided by technicians include Medication History administrative support – high risk
patient flag, AMS administrative support – traffic light referral register system, Wards rounds for
Medication Supply Referral, Identification and Action, Document clinical administrative support
activities via electronic pharmaceutical care support system - ClinPod™.
d. Document all clinical administrative support activities via electronic pharmaceutical care system
- ClinPod™
WT records all activities performed per patient against each patient’s electronic pharmaceutical
care record, in real time utilising ClinPod™.
Pharmacist/assistant interaction
All technicians work under the supervision of a pharmacist and all activities that affect direct patient
care are all verified and approved by a pharmacist. This relationship is managed in an egalitarian and
Education requirements
Completion of the Certificate III/IV Community Pharmacy or have completed the Guild Pharmacy
Technician Course (would prefer Certificate IV in Hospital Pharmacy). Completion of pharmacy
orientation/induction program that includes all eLearning modules. One on one, on-the-job training
with mentor and for the WT role – the WT must be a high performing staff member with at the very
least 12 months experience of the Norwest Private Hospital Pharmacy and have completed an
intensive WT training program with supervised practice and review.
Currently facing increasing demand for expanding comprehensive clinical pharmacy services with
finite clinical pharmacist resources in the face of increasing hospital activity. As a result of the above
there is increasing need to relieve the clinical pharmacist (CP) from as many administrative/technical
functions required of the clinical service so that the CP’s activities are targeted to achieve the greatest
outcome. However for this to occur, CP’s must first have confidence in the skill set of an “advance
practice” technician which will require strong and effective leadership to develop.
7.1.1 How can pharmacy technicians and assistants support pharmacists to increase their
clinical role?
‘Why are pharmacists doing technical roles? Where it is possible to move these to a pharmacy
technician/assistant then this is a good idea.’ Quote from structured interview
‘Currently pharmacists do a lot of technical tasks such as final check on scripts, order for formulary
items, confirming that restricted items are only used according to hospital protocols, preparing
medication profiles. All these tasks are protocol driven and could be done by a pharmacy assistant,
freeing up the pharmacist.’ Quote from structured interview
‘The practice of pharmacy is not set in stone and perhaps there will be further evolution of practice
enabling pharmacists to better serve the public. When it comes to how that works it will depend on
the structures and process that are required to support those changes.’
Quote from structured interview
There is a strong belief from Australian hospital pharmacy stakeholders that pharmacy
technicians/assistants can have a greater role in technical activities, including the clinical support
tasks within ‘clinical activities’ under existing legislation. Redesigning roles in this way would enable
the pharmacist to undertake further clinical activities.
‘Wherever we have a pharmacist we should consider how to leverage the partnership to increase
the clinical impact. The challenge is the way we train the pharmacists. We train them to work
independently rather than work with others.’ Quote from structured interview
Taking the pharmacist, technicians and assistants on a journey to develop hospital pharmacy services
will be key for success of future endeavours.
Future directions of the pharmacy technician and assistant workforce was not the focus of the national
survey, however this forum was used to gain initial input into future directions, with a single open
ended question asking ‘Where do you see technician and assistant roles in the future?’
The following themes were identified as the top 5 most frequently cited:
1. Clinical roles including medication reconciliation, counselling and ward technician roles
2. Accuracy checking technicians
3. Technician led dispensaries
4. Research, data collection and education
5. Dispensing and imprest management
- Data collection roles. For example: current medication chart, pathology results, past medical
history. This data can be provided to the clinical pharmacist for decision making.
- Dispensary tech-checking. Tech check Tech systems for inpatients, IV additives (aseptic
transfer) and potentially outpatients.
- Medication information. Generation of discharge medication profiles to be checked by
pharmacist and protocol driven interactions with patients for a variety of medication counselling
roles.
- Medication reconciliation (MR). Specifically, gathering information and completing the
reconciliation.
- Management roles. Technician led dispensaries, staff management, and education
management.
- Patient roles. Medication history taking, assessing ability to self-medicate, management of
patient own medications.
7.1.2 Barriers/limitations
Human resources, sourcing trained technicians and the limited number of full time equivalent positions
attributed to technician roles are limiting factors in developing future technician roles. Additionally,
training and education quality, consistency and availability, needs to be improved to ensure
consistency in task provision across sites. Comments relating to the lack of career progression and
remuneration resulting in a lack of appropriate personnel in the roles were also made. A lack of
standardisation across the country is a limiting factor for career progression, where progression may
involve movement between hospitals. Before advancing the roles of technicians/assistants, a well-
recognised education and competency development program is required.
Currently, hospital pharmacy technicians/assistants are not clinically trained nor are they trained as
autonomous practitioners, with judgement’, ‘clinical reasoning’ and ‘management’ competencies
currently not addressed through existing qualifications. Under current legislation, errors made by them
will still be the responsibility of the pharmacist. If technicians were to greatly expand their role, they
need to have the legal responsibility, with liability a significant point of discussion within the focus
groups.
As noted earlier in this paper, the current education provisions for pharmacy technicians/assistants
fall below what the industry requires for many of the extended roles that these workers can currently
undertake, with examples of overseas employees being used to fill this national skills gap. Introducing
new qualifications and updating existing qualifications in the National Qualifications Framework is a
large undertaking, while the introduction of National Professional Competency Standards and
credentialing mechanisms are well within the remit of SHPA.
Any development of pharmacy technician/assistant roles must involve pharmacists, who may need to
be socialised to the use of pharmacy technicians/assistants as part of pharmaceutical services
provision as a team.
Pharmacists need to ‘feel safe on this journey’ to ensure they realise that any extension of pharmacy
technician/assistant roles is not encroaching on the existing role of pharmacists. Acknowledging that
some pharmacists may not be interested in extended clinical roles but would rather stay with an
administrative focus is also necessary. In the same way, many pharmacy technicians/assistants do
not have a desire to extend their roles beyond their current functions.
In relation to extended scope of practice roles the following comment was made:
‘Perception from some pharmacists is that pharmacy technicians can’t take on the roles. Perception
from some pharmacy technicians is that they can’t take on the roles either’ Quote from structured
interview
At the state and territory level pharmacy legislation governs who can undertake certain activities such
as dispensing and dangerous drugs movements, while industrial relations instruments such as awards
and EBAs determine role definitions, influence activity ranges for cadres, drive education and create
the structures for possible career advancement.
State and territory wide change, and the possibility of more harmonised national systems for hospital
pharmacy technicians/assistants will require significant advocacy and lobbying for change to take
place.
In Australia the state ministers of health collectively decide which professions should be registered.
There are currently 14 registered health professionals as part of the national registration scheme with
paramedics currently being considered for national registration. It is unlikely that the role of pharmacy
technicians would develop to a threshold where registration would be considered in the Australian
context in the near or medium term. There is a limited appetite on the part of health ministers, for
admitting further cadres to this scheme (2).
In the Australian context other forms of health professional quality assurance exist. For example,
credentialing that is monitored and reviewed by a professional society. Such an approach is a valid
way to balance responsibility and accountability. Dietitians and other health professionals are
credentialed in such a way.
Workforce development of specific cadres is an organic process where scope of practice and
increased activities are driven by a profession with ongoing interaction with key stakeholders. When
these activities reach a threshold which significantly affects patient care then the regulators get
involved. In the Australian context this would be the ministry of health in each state and territory.
One of the current limitations to increasing scope of practice for hospital pharmacy
technicians/assistants is the absence of a mechanism that balances ‘accountability’ and ‘professional
responsibility’, underpinned by robust competency based education and continuing professional
development. Such an absence sees technicians/assistants less engaged in their profession (a lack
of professional satisfaction and ownership), particularly those that would like to improve their role.
Addressing this issue at a national level, considering national competencies, and providing
professional insurance liability cover to suitably credentialed individuals, would provide a solid
platform from which to build the more advanced roles that may be undertaken by hospital pharmacy
technician/assistants.
The experience, roles and desires of hospital pharmacy technicians/assistants varies considerably
across Australia and as such any system considered needs to initially ensure a solid basic foundation
for entry level positions while giving opportunity for advancement for those who wish to move through
that process.
Advocacy tools and management supports – to support the improved utilisation and expanded
scope for hospital pharmacy technicians/assistants (including business case facts and associated
evidence). This would include both tools and direct technical support to drive change implementation.
Professional standards – that clearly document an agreed set of competencies against set activities,
supported by a learning passport to allow movement of staff between hospitals and potentially states
and territories.
Finance – to support the upskilling of pharmacy technicians/assistants, the time needed for project
work and evidence gathering, the change process of role development, and any new positions.
The structured interviews and focus groups clearly demonstrated that SHPA has the brand and
respect among stakeholders to take a leadership role defining standards for pharmacy
technician/assistant roles and associated activities, supporting the development of these
competencies through appropriate quality supportive training and guiding the profession through a
process of optimal use of hospital pharmacy technicians/assistants to both free up pharmacists to
engage in advanced clinical activities and to support the development of an improved professional
environment for pharmacy technicians/assistants.
The following points summarise the need and drivers that would support SHPAs continued
involvement to move the Australian hospital pharmacy technician/assistant agenda forward:
Improving the ability of hospital pharmacists to engage in advanced clinical activities and
supporting the career development of hospital pharmacy technicians/assistants is consistent
with the vision and core strategic foci of SHPA.
The desire to better utilise pharmacy technicians/assistants in Australian hospitals is a priority
of many SHPA members with current development in this area ad-hoc and individual hospital
based.
Systematic health workforce change can be a slow process with the need for significant advocacy
and development activities over a number of years. Within the Australian hospital pharmacy
landscape there are a number of examples where individual hospitals led by empowered Directors of
Pharmacy, have started to make significant local advances for the improved use of hospital pharmacy
technicians/assistants.
There is currently an opportunity for SHPA to make considered and measured investments to develop
the role of hospital pharmacy technicians/assistants. Investments that build on current developments,
that would position SHPA as the professional leadership body in this space, and provide national
direction and support that individual hospitals could use to leverage local improvements.
5
Expand leadership
Pharmacy technician and development and
assistant leadership advocacy (advanced)
development
4
Develop jurisdictional
Document innovative and
SHPA supports to enable
advanced practice in local
all sites to practice at
setting
similar levels
Timeline
12 months
Level of Effort
0.5 FTE for 12 months (SHPA grant via National Translational Research Collaborative [NTRC])
Stakeholders
• Federal Council
• State Branches
• International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP)
• National Pharmacy Technician Network
• Steering Committee Redesign Project
• Members
• Hospitals and Health Services
• Consumers
Note: Analogous to Advanced Pharmacy Practice Framework – there is a need to develop a stepped
approach (see below) to achievement of technician/assistant competencies in Australia. In Australia,
there is no measure of performance levels per competency; i.e. to reflect the performance continuum
associated with learning and career progression. The use of such principles would better support and
guide the professional growth of technicians/assistants, and be more accessible nationally, across
multiple sites and jurisdictions but require external and formal credentialing by SHPA.
advanced
consolidation
transition
general
entry
Timeline
20 – 30 days
Level of Effort
0.4 FTE over 6 months
Will require:
Stakeholder Interviews/financial analysis, including cost of accrediting current qualifications
Stakeholders
• Federal Council
• State Branches
• National Pharmacy Technician Network
• Pharmaceutical Society of Australia/cooperating registered training organisation
• Members
• Hospitals and Health Services
Note 1: SHPA could therefore have more influence in changing the nature and breadth of
qualifications (e.g. beyond Certificate level) and impose greater consistency across Australia. This
may be possible through accrediting the qualification.
Early entry of SHPA into this space would position it for a future where pharmacy technician/assistant
education was compulsory and where SHPA could support pharmacy technicians/assistants in
advanced practice areas.
Level of Effort
0.4 FTE over 6 months – possible Master’s Project and/or coordinate with National Translational
Research Collaborative (NTRC).
PREAMBLE: The 2014 and 2015 Futures Summit identified Future Models of Clinical Practice as a
key theme for development by SHPA. The SHPA Federal Council has determined that
in order to develop new and advanced practice roles in integrated care there is an
immediate need to build capacity in the pharmacist workforce through developing and
expanding the scope of practice of pharmacy technicians and assistants.
The Pharmacy Technician and Assistant Role Redesign within Australian Hospitals
project aims to review the current roles and frameworks that support hospital pharmacy
technicians across Australia and overseas, identify variations in scope of practice, and
barriers to changes in scope. From a national perspective the project will aim to develop
Australian pharmacy technician scope with appropriate supporting tools to ensure
sustainability into the future.
The project will consult with a range of stakeholders to identify what is required to
enable changes to roles to occur in the future. Such requirements may include task
definition, mentoring, practice-based competency training, industrial relations and/or
legislative changes.
The Redesign Project will ultimately build capacity in the Australian hospital
pharmacy workforce and improve our ability to meet the ever expanding requirements
for hospital pharmacy services from our patients.
PURPOSE: The Re-design Project Steering Committee purpose is to guide the direction of the re-
design project, ensure engagement of key stakeholders, provide expert content
knowledge and drive the development of tools that will support the progression of the
Australian Hospital pharmacy technician workforce.
RESPONSIBLE TO:
Federal Council
MEMBERSHIP:
• Chair*
• Supporting Councillor
• National Pharmacy Technician Network Chair (NPTN)
• Pharmacy Technician member of SHPA
• Any other person who may be appointed from time to time by the Federal Council.
*The Chair may also be the supporting Councillor. If this is the case, an additional
Councillor will be appointed.
The Project Officer acts as secretariat to the Steering Committee.
APPOINTMENT:
The Chair, supporting Councillor and National Pharmacy Technician Network Chair are
appointed by Federal Council. Other Steering Committee members are selected by an
expression of interest process to SHPA members. The Chair recommends
MEETINGS: Meetings are to be held via teleconference or other electronic means as needed. Face
to face meetings may be necessary on occasion. Support and advice will be provided
by the Project Officer and other SHPA Secretariat staff.
QUORUM: A quorum of the Committee shall consist of a majority of appointed members. At least one
Councillor must be present.
Please note: Adherence as relevant to other SHPA policies and guidelines including latest versions
on the SHPA Conflict of Interest ; SHPA Code of Ethics and Social Media policy documents.
Author: RRaleigh
Focus Groups:
New South Wales, Victoria, Western Australia
Structured Interviews:
Queensland - Outer Regional Public Acute Group C hospital
Northern Territory – Department of Health
South Australia - Major City Public acute Group A hospital
Tasmania - Inner Regional Private Acute Group A hospital
Victoria - Major City Principal Referral Hospital