Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
227
INTRODUCTION
2,6-Di(5,6-dialkyl-1,2,4-triazin-3-yl)pyridines,
EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure
spectra of DPTP was considered an appropriate tool. Fig. 1 shows that the
spectrum exhibits only one intensive, diluent dependent (lmax ¼ 299 nm in
TPH=1-octanol and 287 nm in 1-butanol) band. The asymmetrical form of the
band implies superposition of two peaks. The left one possibly belongs to a H
bonded DPTP=alcohol complex.
The spectrum changes negligibly after 160 min. This is seemingly in
contradiction to observation made in the work with Am(III) and Eu(III) (5). There
the color of DPTP solutions in TPH=2-ethyl-1-hexanol changed within a few
hours from yellow to orange. This change had indeed no influence on the
extraction of Am(III) and Eu(III). It also occurred in this work, in which
1-octanol was taken as a solvent modifier. It seems to be caused by quite
insignificant changes of the spectrum, e.g. by a small increase of the absorbancy
in the region between 320 and 350 nm.
Equilibration of 5.686105 M DPTP in 1-butanol with 0.2 M NH4SCN
has a very small effect on the absorption spectrum of DPTP, slightly enhancing
the absorbancy on the right side of the main peak.
The spectrum of DPTP in TPH=1-octanol (4=1) has the equilibrium form
shown in Fig. 1 only if DPTP is dissolved in a ready mixture of both diluents. If
DPTP is dissolved in 1-octanol and TPH is subsequently added, a transitory
spectrum similar to that in 1-butanol is obtained (see Fig. 2 and compare it with
Fig. 1). Expected conversion of the transitory spectrum to the equilibrium one
proceeds extremely slowly (see Fig. 2), having progressed little even after 8 d. It is
important that the extraction of metal salts was independent of the mode of
dissolution of DPTP.
Figure 1. Influence of the diluent and the solution aging on the absorption spectrum of
5.926105 M DPTP at room temperature.
EXTRACTION OF ALKALINE EARTHS 231
Compared to other metals, alkaline earth elements and Mg(II) are generally
weakly extractable. To investigate their extractability by DPTP, it was desirable to
take the elements in the form of relatively well extractable salts. Data in (6) imply
that thiocyanates should be a suitable form, because in the distribution of Am(III)
and Eu(III) they are more extractable than e.g. nitrates. Also necessary was the
choice of a suitable diluent which had to dissolve effectively DPTP alone as well
as the extracted complexes. THP=1-octanol was used in the first experiments
because it had proved effective in the Am=Eu separation in nitrate systems (1,2).
However, minute amounts of solids formed in the extraction of alkaline earth
thiocyanates. They did not disturb the establishing of the distribution equilibrium
but retarded the phase disengagement. Good dissolving properties were exhibited
by oxygen containing diluents of common classes, and we used them in further
experiments.
Data in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 corroborate the good extractability of alkaline
earth thiocyanates. Practicable distribution ratios of Ca(II), Sr(II), and Mg(II)
(DCa, DSr, and DMg, respectively) were found even at a pH value as low as pH 1.7.
The extractability of Ba(II) was studied only with the TPH=1-octanol diluent. The
distribution ratio of Ba(II) was <0.12 at 0.2–1.0 M NH4SCN.
The log DM vs. log [SCN] dependencies shown in Fig. 3 are linear, but
their slopes differ from element to element and are <2. As for possible
explanations, different variation of activity coefficients with the thiocyanate
concentration or different thiocyanate complexing of the M2þ ions in the aqueous
232 KOLARIK AND RAIS
Figure 4. Influence of the DPTP concentration on the extraction of Mg(II), Ca(II), and
Sr(II) thiocyanates. Initial aqueous phase: 0.2 M NH4SCN, 0.002 M CaCl2 or 0.02 M
Sr(NO3)2 and 0.02 M HCl. Diluent: TPH=1-Octanol (4=1, full points), MiBK (stars), or
1-butanol (open points). Room temperature.
EXTRACTION OF ALKALINE EARTHS 233
of the concentrations of really free HClDC and DPTP impossible, and it impedes
the slope analysis. It is insufficient to consider for the slope analysis solely the
fraction of HClDC bound to Ca(II) and Sr(II) and to calculate formally ‘‘free’’
concentrations of HClDC. To demonstrate, we calculated the ‘‘free’’ concentra-
tion of HClDC, plausibly assuming that two anions of HClDC are needed to
neutralize the charge of the Ca2þ and Sr2þ ions, and used this value as the
independent variable in Fig. 6. It is not surprising that the steepness of the
ascending part of the dependencies does not correspond to the expected slope 2.
Instead, the slopes 0.5 and 1 are approached at low ‘‘free’’ HClDC concentrations
with Ca(II) and Sr(II), respectively.
The log DCa vs. log [Hþ ] dependency shown in Fig. 7 is steeper as
expected. The upper curve has a slope of 3.15, and the middle curve can be
described as tending to a slope of 3 rather than 2. Again it has to be referred to the
credible ion-pair formation between HClDC and DPTP, which most probably is
responsible for it.
Figure 7 also illustrates the diluent effect, showing that the extraction of
Ca(II) is much less effective with the extractants dissolved in MiBK than in ethyl
acetate. For this reason ethyl acetate, or its less aqueous soluble analogue butyl
acetate, was used in further work. Such diluents as 2-ethyl-1-hexanol, 1-butanol
and TPH=2-ethyl-1-hexanol (4=1) are inapplicable due to solubility problems. An
attempt to dissolve both HClDC and DPTP in them results in the formation of a
yellow precipitate, which most probably is a DPTP salt of HClDC.
236 KOLARIK AND RAIS
The distribution ratios of both Ca(II) and Sr(II) increase rather steeply with
the DPTP concentration in ethyl acetate, approaching slopes of 5 and 4,
respectively (see Fig. 8). Again due to the impossibility of calculating simply the
concentration of really free DPTP, the steepness of the curves gives no direct
information about the solvation numbers of the extracted complexes.
It was of interest to check the behavior of DPTP in one of the nitro diluents,
which have almost exclusively been used in the work on dicarbollides. Fig. 8
shows the extraction of Sr(II) chlorodicarbollide by DPTP in o-nitrophenyl octyl
ether, and compares it with that by DPTP in butyl acetate. With the nitro diluent,
even HClDC alone gives for Sr(II) a measurable distribution coefficient, while a
very low value is to be expected with the butyl acetate diluent. On the other side,
synergistic increase of the Sr(II) extraction by DPTP in the nitro diluent is
minimal. There is even a suppression of the Sr(II) extraction at high DPTP
concentrations, ascribable to binding of HClDC and DTPT in molecular
complexes.
It is to be noticed in Fig. 6 to Fig. 8 that the synergistic combination
HClDC=DPTP extracts Ca(II) and Sr(II) with an unusually high efficiency. So a
distribution ratio of 1 is attained with 0.01 M HClDC þ 0.01 M DTPT in an
alkyl acetate diluent at a HCl concentration as high as 0.5 M. Figure 6 and Fig.
8 show that the Ca(II)=Sr(II) separation efficiency is indeed lower than in the
extraction of thiocyanates. A separation factor of aCa=Sr 20 can be attained at a
suitable concentration ratio of the extractants, e.g., as indicated in Fig. 6, at
0.009 M DPTP and 0.016–0.020 M HClDC.
EXTRACTION OF ALKALINE EARTHS 237
Figure 8. Influence of the DPTP concentration on the extraction of Ca(II) and Sr(II)
chlorodicarbollidates. Initial aqueous phase: 0.002 M CaCl2 or 0.0022 M SrCl2 and 0.15 M
HCl (solid points), and trace Sr(II) þ 0.2 M HNO3 (open points). Butyl acetate (AcOBu) or
o-nitrophenyl octyl ether (NPOE) diluents. Room temperature.
Figure 10. Influence of the DPTP concentration on the extraction of trace Sr(II) or
Ba(II) as dicarbollidates from 0.1 M NaOH. Equilibrium organic phase: 0.01 M
NaDC þ variable DPTP in nitrobenzene. Room temperature.
bad reproducibility of the data in Fig. 9 can be ascribed to the very steep character
of the log DSr vs. log [DPTP] dependency at >0.003 M DPTP (see Fig. 10).
The DSr values may thus be so sensitive to small changes of the DPTP
concentrations that even common inaccuracies in pipetting deteriorate the
reproducibility of them.
EXTRACTION OF ALKALINE EARTHS 239
Second, log DSr or log DBa vs. log [DPTP] dependencies shown in Fig. 10
clearly demonstrate that DPTP can cause a very strong synergistic effect in the
extraction by NaDC from 0.1 M NaOH. In contrast, there is practically no
synergistic effect in the extraction by HClDC in a nitro diluent from 0.2 M HNO3
(see the lower curve in Fig. 8).
The extremely steep part of the log DSr vs. log [DPTP] dependency is in
Fig. 10 interpreted by a full line as approaching a slope of 5, but approach to a
slope of 6 would be a plausible interpretation as well. The log DBa vs. log [DPTP]
dependency is in Fig. 10 interpreted to approach a slope of 4. The Sr(II)=Ba(II)
separation factor is moderate, namely 5.5 at 0.01 M DTPT. The less common
reverse extractability order, Ba(II) > Sr(II), is found only at low DPTP concen-
trations, i.e. in the region of low DSr and DBa values. The Ba(II)=Sr(II) separation
factor is 9.4 at 0.001 M DPTP.
CONCLUSIONS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The work of one of us (J. R.) was supported by the Czech grant
104=01=0142 of Czech Grant Agency.
REFERENCES