Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Mastocytosis is a heterogeneous condition characterized by clonal proliferation
and accumulation of mast cells in various tissues. In particular, these include the
skin and/or bone marrow; involvement of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, spleen,
and lymph nodes is more uncommon [1–3]. The World Health Organization
(WHO) classification divides the clinical manifestations of mastocytosis into cuta-
neous and systemic subtypes as well as mast cell sarcoma (Table 1) [4].
The characteristic skin lesions of cutaneous mastocytosis were fi rst described
by Nettleship and Tay in 1869 [5]. In 1878, Sangster coined the term urticaria
pigmentosa [6 ]. One year later, Paul Ehrlich discovered the mast cell, and in 1887,
42 © 2018 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | JDDG | 1610-0379/2018/1601
CME Article
Unna described the correlation between urticaria pigmentosa lesions and an in-
creased number of dermal mast cells [7 ].
Disorders designated as mastocytosis Mast cells migrate – in the form of immature CD-34-positive precursor cells –
are characterized by clonal proliferation from the bone barrow via the blood stream into various tissues, where they undergo
of mast cells in various organs. A muta- maturation [8]. Binding of the stem cell factor (SCF) to the SCF receptor KIT (CD117)
tion in the KIT gene (usually D816V), regulates mast cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival. In patients with
which codes for the KIT (CD117) recep- mastocytosis, a somatic mutation of the KIT gene – usually a point mutation in codon
tor of the stem cell factor (SCF), results 816 ( = KITD816V) – results in autocrine dysregulation (gain of function mutation) and
in SCF-independent proliferation and clonal proliferation of mast cells [9]. Only very rarely do adult mastocytosis patients
activation of mast cells. exhibit other mutations. The clinical symptoms associated with mast cell disorders are
attributable to the release of histamine and other mast cell mediators such as prost-
aglandins, leukotrienes, and cytokines. Disease course and prognosis depend on the
clinical manifestation, age of onset, and potentially associated comorbidities [10].
Epidemiology
Mastocytosis is rare. Approximately Mastocytosis is rare. While the annual incidence is thought to range between 5 and
65 % of patients are children; 35 % are 10 new cases per 1 million population, the condition is likely more common [14]
adults. There is no gender predilection. as patients with only minimal clinical manifestations frequently go undiagnosed.
Almost always is the condition caused There has been a marked uptick in the number of reported cases in the USA and
by spontaneous mutations. Europe in the past 20 years because of improved diagnostic methods, greater awa-
reness at national and international conferences, and increased education of the
general public [2]. Roughly 65 % of patients are children; 35 % are adults. There is
no gender predilection [14]. Nearly all cases are caused by a spontaneous mutation;
familial mastocytosis disorders, usually with a dominant inheritance pattern, have
been described very rarely [15].
Clinical manifestations
Mastocytoma
In childhood, cutaneous mastocytosis frequently occurs in the form of mastocyto-
ma, which presents as yellowish to red-brown, sharply demarcated plaques or no-
dules; lesions may be solitary or multiple and predominantly arise on the trunk.
© 2018 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | JDDG | 1610-0379/2018/1601 43
CME Article
Measuring from 1–10 cm in diameter, they are already present at birth or usually
develop in the fi rst weeks of life. Initially, blistering is common, usually triggered
by mechanical stimuli or drugs such as codeine-containing anti-cough medications.
In general, pediatric mastocytoma lesions resolve by the time patients reach adole-
scence; they are not associated with systemic mast cell infi ltration (Figure 1) [16].
44 © 2018 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | JDDG | 1610-0379/2018/1601
CME Article
In childhood, cutaneous mastocytosis of the massive dermal mast cell infi ltration, the skin has a doughy and leathery
usually presents as mastocytoma or a appearance (peau de chagrin) and is fi rm to palpation. Pronounced urticarial der-
maculopapular rash. The latter is di- mographism may be induced by mechanical stimulation; widespread blistering is
vided into a monomorphic form with common. Apart from a few cases showing systemic involvement, this variant too is
small macules and a polymorphic vari- marked by spontaneous resolution prior to adulthood.
ant with large patches. Studies on the course of pediatric cutaneous mastocytosis show complete re-
mission in approximately 70 % of cases; substantial remission, in 20 %; and par-
tial remission in 10 % [20–22].
The incidence of bone marrow involvement in childhood can only be esti-
mated, given that invasive procedures are rarely employed and/or recommended.
In children, too, measurement of serum tryptase is used to assess total mast cell
burden. Elevated tryptase levels indicate extensive disease [19, 20]. Based on flow
Prior to adolescence, pediatric cytometric detection of CD25 on mast cells, it is estimated that bone marrow in-
mastocytosis shows a high spontaneous volvement occurs in up to 30 % of pediatric cases [20]. There are currently no
mutation rate. blood markers to predict the clinical course of mastocytosis in children.
© 2018 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | JDDG | 1610-0379/2018/1601 45
CME Article
Systemic mastocytosis
The diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis requires the major criterion (multifocal
dense aggregates of 15 or more mast cells in bone marrow and/or one or more
46 © 2018 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | JDDG | 1610-0379/2018/1601
CME Article
Criteria for systemic mastocytosis: 1) ag- other extracutaneous organs) and at least one minor criterion to be fulfi lled. Al-
gregates of ≥ 15 mast cells in bone mar- ternatively, if the major criterion is not met, three of the four minor criteria are
row and/or ≥ 1 other extracutaneous required: 1) 25 % of mast cells in the infi ltrate in extracutaneous organs or in
organ(s) (major criterion), 2) 25 % of the blood exhibit atypical or spindle-shaped morphology, 2) evidence of a KIT
mast cells in the infiltrate/blood exhibit mutation in codon 816 in bone marrow, blood, or another extracutaneous tissue,
atypical/spindle-shaped morphology, 3) expression of CD2 and/or CD25 on mast cells in bone marrow, blood, or
3) KIT mutation D816V in bone mar- another extracutaneous organ, and 4) persistently elevated serum tryptase levels
row, blood, or another extracutaneous > 20 ng/mL (Table 2). According to the WHO classification, systemic mastocy-
organ, 4) persistently elevated serum tosis is divided into indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM), smoldering systemic
tryptase levels > 20 ng/mL. mastocytosis, systemic mastocytosis with an associated hematologic neoplasm
(SM-AHN), aggressive systemic mastocytosis (ASM), mast cell leukemia (MCL),
and mast cell sarcoma (Table 1) [4]. Only 20–40 % of pediatric cases are associa-
ted with the typical KIT mutation [24].
Major criteria
– Multifocal dense aggregates of 15 or more mast cells in bone marrow and/or
one or more other extracutaneous organs, confirmed by tryptase immunohis-
tochemistry or other special stains
Minor criteria
– 25 % of mast cells in the infiltrate in extracutaneous organs or in the blood
exhibit atypical or spindle-shaped morphology
– Evidence of a KIT mutation in codon 816 in bone marrow, blood, or another
extracutaneous tissue
– Co-expression of CD2 and/or CD25 on mast cells in bone marrow, blood, or
another extracutaneous organ
– Persistently elevated serum tryptase levels > 20 ng/mL (except in clonal mye-
loid disease)
The diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis requires 1) one major criterion and at least
one minor criterion or 2) 3 minor criteria.
© 2018 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | JDDG | 1610-0379/2018/1601 47
CME Article
Symptoms
Clinical symptoms in mastocytosis patients are attributable to the release of va-
rious mast cell mediators (mediator-related symptoms). Apart from histamine,
tryptase, heparin, leukotrienes and prostaglandins, various cytokines (e.g., TNFα ,
interleukins [ILs]) are released.
Pediatric forms of cutaneous mastocytosis are usually characterized by loca-
lized symptoms such as erythema, pruritus, and edema. Flushing or generalized
urticarial symptoms are more uncommon. If present, they are frequently triggered
by friction; more rarely, by drugs or foods.
Having a marked impact on quality of life, pruritus is the most common
symptom in adults with cutaneous mastocytosis [32]. Apart from histamine and
tryptase, other cytokines – such as IL31 – involved in the pathogenesis of pruritus
have been discovered in recent years [33]. Interleukin 31 is primarily produced
by Th2 lymphocytes and is associated with pruritus in atopic dermatitis. Besides
mast cells, tumor cells (T- and B-cell lymphoma, myeloproliferative disorders) also
secrete IL31 [34].
Nonspecific symptoms such as gastrointestinal complaints (predominantly di-
arrhea, abdominal cramps, nausea, vomiting), tachycardia, hypotension, headache,
48 © 2018 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | JDDG | 1610-0379/2018/1601
CME Article
myalgia, bone pain, flushing, fatigue, and neurological symptoms are frequently
reported, irrespective of tryptase levels. Up to 30 % of patients with mastocytosis
experience osseous involvement in the form of osteopenia (with/without lytic lesi-
ons)/osteoporosis (with/without atraumatic fractures) as well as osteosclerosis with
increased density or isolated lytic lesions [35]. Bone-related cytokines – RANKL
(receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand), OPG (osteoprotegerin), and
SOST (sclerostin) – are elevated in patients with ISM and can interfere with bone
remodeling [36, 37 ].
Mastocytosis patients frequently show Mastocytosis patients show a high prevalence of anaphylactic reactions; the
a variety of mediator-related symptoms initial diagnosis of mastocytosis is frequently made in this context [38–40]. At
and anaphylactic reactions, in particu- 49 %, the incidence of anaphylaxis is much higher in adults than in children (9 %).
lar due to insect venom and foods. Os- While pediatric cases of anaphylaxis have only been observed in children with
teopenia, osteoporosis, or osteosclero- extensive skin involvement or high tryptase levels [40, 41], adult systemic mastocy-
sis occur in about one-third of patients. tosis patients without cutaneous involvement are more commonly affected (56 %)
than those with typical mastocytosis-related skin lesions [38, 40, 42, 43]. The main
triggers of anaphylaxis in adults include insect bites (19 %), foods (16 %), and
drugs (9 %) [38, 40].
Diagnosis
Basic diagnostic workup includes a thorough inspection of the entire skin, testing
for Darier’s sign, as well as palpation of lymph nodes, liver, and spleen. Skin lesions
clinically indicative of cutaneous mastocytosis should be biopsied. In children, a
biopsy may not be required if clinical fi ndings are unequivocal and if there is no
evidence of extensive disease [44].
Histological staining methods employed include Giemsa and toluidine blue
stain. CD117 and tryptase staining are used for immunohistochemical mast cell
detection [45].
Patients should be explicitly asked about immediate-type hypersensitivities.
In particular, reactions to insect bites, foods, drugs, and X-ray contrast agents
should be inquired about and adequately worked up (specific IgE, prick and/or
intradermal testing). A detailed history should be obtained as regards mediator-re-
lated symptoms such as pruritus, flushing, bone pain, fatigue, as well as cardiac,
gastrointestinal, and neurological symptoms.
Recommended baseline studies include routine blood tests (CBC with diffe-
rential, liver and renal function tests, calcium, alkaline phosphatase) and serum
tryptase levels. The latter correlate well with total mast cell burden [46, 47 ]. Mea-
surement of urine methylhistamine levels – an indirect marker of mast cell de-
granulation – is more complex and reserved for special cases [48]. The majority
of patients with systemic mastocytosis show tryptase levels > 20 ng/mL. Patients
with cutaneous mastocytosis and serum tryptase levels < 20 ng/mL usually also
demonstrate bone marrow involvement [23]. It is therefore recommended that
adult patients undergo bone marrow aspiration during the course of the disease
to determine the subtype of mastocytosis. Given that the extent of bone marrow
infi ltration associated with cutaneous mastocytosis may be minor, the diagnosis of
“cutaneous mastocytosis” is maintained even in the presence of two minor criteria.
The term mastocytosis in skin (MIS) is also used, provided the WHO criteria of
systemic mastocytosis are not met [44, 45]. Criteria that warrant bone marrow
aspiration in children include serum tryptase levels of > 100 ng/mL, pronounced
cytopenia, lymphopenia, and/or splenomegaly [46 ].
It has been shown that tryptase levels rise during anaphylaxis, reach a peak
after about two hours, and then return to baseline after about 24 hours. Following
© 2018 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | JDDG | 1610-0379/2018/1601 49
CME Article
Treatment
Treatment of mastocytosis is guided by symptoms and tailored on an individual
basis.
Education about potential trigger factors in adults and children is imperative.
These include physical stimuli, emotional stress, spicy and hot foods, alcohol, bac-
terial/viral infections, and drugs. No prospective controlled studies exist on the
frequency and severity of anaphylactic reactions to drugs in mastocytosis patients.
There have been isolated reports of anaphylaxis after local anesthesia. However,
given the limited data, there is to date no evidence that mastocytosis patients are at
greater risk for local anesthetic-induced anaphylaxis than the general population.
The same applies to radiocontrast agents [39]; here, anaphylactic reactions tend to
be more common in adults than in children [40]. While some authors recommend
avoidance of histamine-releasing drugs such as morphine, opioids, and muscle re-
laxants, there is confl icting data in the literature with respect to drugs that are
tolerated and those that may act as potential triggers. The benefit of premedicati-
on with antihistamines and corticosteroids has not been proven but is usually re-
commended. Mastocytosis patients should inform their doctors/anesthesiologists
about their disease. Following an anaphylactic reaction, patients should be worked
up in the same way as other anaphylaxis patients [39]. In case of concomitant in-
sect venom hypersensitivity, treatment should follow guidelines once the diagnosis
and indication have been established.
Children usually require no or only temporary treatment on an as-needed
basis: oral antihistamines as well as topical cromolyn or polidocanol [55–57 ].
50 © 2018 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | JDDG | 1610-0379/2018/1601
CME Article
© 2018 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | JDDG | 1610-0379/2018/1601 51
CME Article
52 © 2018 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | JDDG | 1610-0379/2018/1601
CME Article
cell disorder by defi nition. These include flushing, headache, pruritus, urticaria,
angioedema, nasal congestion, diarrhea, tenesmus, and fatigue. Mast cell activati-
on induced by various stimuli is thought to be the underlying cause.
It is frequently difficult to distinguish these clinical symptoms from those of
other diseases. There are no unequivocal, objective parameters. Serum tryptase le-
vels in particular are used for the diagnosis [68, 69]. A consensus conference has
proposed a transient increase in tryptase levels by at least 20 % from baseline + 2 ng/
mL as evidence for the presence of mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS). MCAS is
suspected if the following criteria are met: 1) relevant clinical symptoms, 2) response
to H1 and H2 antihistamines, mast cell stabilizers (cromolyn), or leukotriene anta-
gonists, and 3) increase in tryptase levels (as defined above). MCAS is classified into
a primary, secondary, and idiopathic form (Table 5). By definition, primary MCAS is
characterized by monoclonal mast cells (D816V mutation or other activating exon 17
KIT mutations and/or CD25 expression on mast cells). If the WHO criteria for sys-
temic mastocytosis are not met, the diagnosis to be considered is (primary) monoclo-
nal mast cell activation syndrome. Secondary MCAS includes a variety of disorders
without evidence of clonal mast cells yet associated with clinical symptoms of mast
cell activation: IgE-mediated hypersensitivity, autoimmune urticaria and physical ur-
ticaria, and mast cell activation in the context of chronic inflammatory or neoplastic
diseases. Idiopathic MCAS is a diagnosis of exclusion that requires a comprehensive
workup to rule out other causes; here, patients have neither allergies nor monoclonal
mast cells nor any other underlying disorders potentially associated with mast cell
activation [70, 71]. Given the clinical overlap with other diseases, further research is
required to elucidate the exact pathogenesis of mast cell activation syndromes [71].
Because of the variety of clinical symptoms, it is useful to provide patients
with written information about their disease. In addition, they should be advised
about the possibility to contact patient organizations.
Summary
Mastocytosis is characterized by clonal expansion of mast cells in various or-
gans, frequently in the skin and bone marrow. The majority of pediatric forms,
such as mastocytoma or maculopapular cutaneous mastocytosis, tend to resolve
© 2018 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | JDDG | 1610-0379/2018/1601 53
CME Article
References
1 Valent P, Horny HP, Escribano L et al. Diagnostic criteria and classification of mastocy-
tosis: a consensus proposal. Leuk Res 2001; 25( 7): 603 –25.
2 Valent P, Akin C, Metcalfe DD. Mastocytosis: 2016 updated WHO classification and
novel emerging treatment concepts. Blood 2017; 129 (11): 1420 –7.
3 Metcalfe DD. Mast cells and mastocytosis. Blood 2008; 112(4): 946 – 56.
4 Arber DA , Orazi A , Hasserjian R et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organiza-
tion classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood 2016; 127(20):
2391 –405.
5 Nettleship E, Tay W. Rare forms of urticaria. Br Med J 1869; 2: 323 –30.
6 Sangster A. An anomalous mottled rash, accompanied by pruritus, factious urticaria
and pigmentation, “urticaria pigmentosa”. Clin Soc Lond 1878; 11: 161 –3.
7 Unna P. Beiträge zur Anatomie und Pathogenese der Urticaria simplex und pigmen-
tosa. Mschr Prakt Dermatol Suppl Dermatol Stud 1887; 3: 9.
8 Schmetzer O, Valentin P, Church MK et al. Murine and human mast cell progenitors.
Eur J Pharmacol 2016; 778: 2 –10.
9 Horny HP, Sotlar K, Valent P et al. Die Mastozytose. Dtsch Arztebl 2008; 105(40): 686 – 92.
10 Valent P, Akin C, Hartmann K et al. Advances in the classification and treatment of
mastocytosis: current status and outlook toward the future. Cancer Res 2017; 77(6):
1261 –70.
11 da Silva EZ, Jamur MC, Oliver C. Mast cell function: a new vision of an old cell. J Histo-
chem Cytochem 2014; 62(10): 698 –738.
12 Gilfillan AM, Peavy RD, Metcalfe DD. Amplification mechanisms for the enhancement
of antigen-mediated mast cell activation. Immunol Res 2009; 43(1–3): 15–24 .
13 Maurer M, Theoharides T, Granstein RD et al. What is the physiological function of
mast cells? Exp Dermatol 2003; 12(6): 886 – 910.
14 Hartmann K , Henz BM. Mastocytosis: recent advances in defining the disease. Br J Der-
matol 2001; 144(4): 682 – 95.
15 Wöhrl S, Moritz KB, Bracher A et al. A c-kit mutation in exon 18 in familial mastocyto-
sis. J Invest Dermatol 2013; 133( 3): 839 –41.
16 Siebenhaar F, Weller K , Blume-Peytavi U, Maurer M. Childhood onset mastocytosis.
Hautarzt 2012; 63(2): 104 – 9.
17 Wiechers T, Rabenhorst A , Schick T et al. Large maculopapular cutaneous lesions are
associated with favorable outcome in childhood-onset mastocytosis. J Allergy ClinIm-
munol 2015; 136(6): 1581 – 90.
18 Hartmann K , Escribano L, Grattan C et al. Cutaneous manifestations in patients with
mastocytosis: Consensus report of the European Competence Network on Mastocyto-
sis; the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology; and the European Acad-
emy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2016; 137(1): 35–45.
19 Torrelo A , Alvarez-Twose I, Escribano L. Childhood mastocytosis. Curr Opin Pediatr
Correspondence to
2012; 24(4): 480 – 6.
20 Uzzaman A , Maric I, Noel P et al. Pediatric-onset mastocytosis: a long term clinical
Dr. med. Nicola Wagner
follow-up and correlation with bone marrow histopathology. Pediatr Blood Cancer
Department of Dermatology
2009; 53: 629 –34 .
University Medical Center 21 Hartmann K , Metcalfe DD. Pediatric mastocytosis. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am
Ulmenweg 18 2000; 14( 3): 625–40.
22 Briley LD, Phillips CM. Cutaneous mastocytosis: a review focusing on the pediatric
91054 Erlangen, Germany
population. Clin Pediatr 2008; 47(8): 757– 61.
E-mail: nicola.wagner@uk- 23 Berezowska S, Flaig MJ, Ruëff F et al. Adult-onset mastocytosis in the skin is highly
erlangen.de suggestive of systemic mastocytosis. Mod Pathol 2014; 27(1): 19 –29.
54 © 2018 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | JDDG | 1610-0379/2018/1601
CME Article
© 2018 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | JDDG | 1610-0379/2018/1601 55
CME Article
48 Van Toorenenbergen AW, Oranje AP. Comparison of serum tryptase and urine N-meth-
ylhistamine in patients with suspected mastocytosis. Clin Chim Acta 2005; 359: 72 –7.
49 Kristensen T, Broesby-Olsen S, Vestergaard H et al. Circulating KIT D816V mutation-
positive non-mast cells in peripheral blood are characteristic of indolent systemic
mastocytosis. Eur J Haematol 2012; 89 (1): 42 – 6.
50 Arock M, Sotlar K , Akin C et al. KIT mutation analysis in mast cell neoplasms: recom-
mendations of the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis. Leukemia 2015;
29 (6): 1223 –32.
51 Valent P, Escribano L, Broesby-Olsen S et al. Proposed diagnostic algorithm for pa-
tients with suspected mastocytosis: a proposal of the European Competence Network
on Mastocytosis. Allergy 2014; 69 (10): 1267–74 .
52 Metcalfe DD, Mekori YA . Pathogenesis and Pathology of Mastocytosis. Annu Rev
Pathol 2017; 12: 487– 514 .
53 Morgado JM, Sánchez-Muñoz L, Teodósio CG et al. Immunophenotyping in systemic
mastocytosis diagnosis: ‘CD25 positive’ alone is more informative than the ‘CD25 and/
or CD2’ WHO criterion. Mod Pathol 2012; 25(4): 516 –21.
54 Blatt K , Cerny-Reiterer S, Schwaab J et al. Identification of the Ki-1 antigen (CD30) as a
novel therapeutic target in systemic mastocytosis. Blood 2015; 126(26): 2832 –41.
55 Castells M, Metcalfe DD, Escribano L. Diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous mastocy-
tosis in children: practical recommendations. Am J Clin Dermatol 2011; 12: 259 –70.
56 Brockow K , Ring J. Update on diagnosis and treatment of mastocytosis. Curr Allergy
Asthma Rep 2011; 11(4): 292 – 9.
57 Vieira Dos Santos R , Magerl M, Martus P et al. Topical sodium cromoglicate relieves al-
lergen- and histamine-induced dermal pruritus. Br J Dermatol 2010; 162( 3): 674 – 6.
58 Brazzelli V, Grasso V, Manna G et al. Indolent systemic mastocytosis treated with nar-
row-band UVB phototherapy: study of five cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2012;
26 (4): 465– 9.
59 Rossini M, Zanotti R , Orsolini G et al. Prevalence, pathogenesis, and treatment options
for mastocytosis-related osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2016; 27(8): 2411 –21.
60 Akin C. Cladribine for mastocytosis: benefits and risks. Blood 2015; 20; 126(8): 931 –2.
61 Gülen T, Akin C. Pharmacotherapy of mast cell disorders. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Im-
munol 2017; 17(4): 295–303.
62 Jawhar M, Schwaab J, Naumann N et al. Response and progression on midostaurin in
advanced systemic mastocytosis: KIT D816V and other molecular markers. Blood 2017;
130 (2): 137–45.
63 Arock M, Akin C, Hermine O, Valent P. Current treatment options in patients with mas-
tocytosis: status in 2015 and future perspectives. Mod Pathol 2013; 26(4): 533 –43.
64 Ustun C, DeRemer DL, AkinC. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of systemic
mastocytosis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2014; 34(2): 315–21.
65 Gotlib J, Kluin-Nelemans HC, George TI et al. Efficacy and safety of midostaurin in ad-
vanced systemic mastocytosis. N Engl J Med 2016; 374(26): 2530 –41.
66 Lim KH, Pardanani A , Butterfield JH et al. Cytoreductive therapy in 108 adults with
systemic mastocytosis: outcome analysis and response prediction during treatment
with interferon-alpha, hydroxyurea, imatinibmesylate or 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine. Am
J Hematol 2009; 84: 790 –4 .
67 Ryan RJ, Akin C, Castells M et al. Mast cell sarcoma: a rare and potentially under-rec-
ognized diagnostic entity with specific therapeutic implications. Leuk Res 2011; 35(9):
1143–52.
68 Horny HP, Sotlar K , Valent P. Evaluation of mast cell activation syndromes: impact of
pathology and immunohistology. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2014;2(6): 775– 8.
69 Ravi A , Butterfield J, Weiler CR . Mast cell activation syndrome: improved identi-
fication by combined determinations of serum tryptase and 24-hour urine 11β -
prostaglandin2α . J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2014; 2(6): 775– 8.
70 Valent P, Akin C, Arock M et al. Definitions, criteria and global classification of mast
cell disorders with special reference to mast cell activation syndromes: a consensus
proposal. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2012; 157: 215–25.
71 Brockow K. Mast cell activation syndrome. Hautarzt 2013; 64(2): 102 – 6.
56 © 2018 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | JDDG | 1610-0379/2018/1601
CME Article
© 2018 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | JDDG | 1610-0379/2018/1601 57