You are on page 1of 1

Environmental Geotechnics Soil–atmosphere interactions for

analysing slopes in tropical soils in


Singapore
Toll, Md. Rahim, Karthikeyan and Tsaparas

Offprint provided courtesy of www.icevirtuallibrary.com


Author copy for personal use, not for distribution

0·55

0·50
Volumetric water content

0·45

0·40

0·35

0·30
0·1 1 10 100 1000
Matric suction: kPa
Wetting Drying Wetting fitted curve Drying fitted curve
(a)
0·60
Tsaparas (2002)
UP-1 (Agus et al., 2003)
0·50
UP-3 (Agus et al., 2003)
Volumetric water content

0·40 Upper bound

0·30
Average
Note:
0·20 Upper and lower water
retention curves obtained
from Agus et al. (2001)
using saturated volumetric
water content of 0·53.
Lower bound
0·10

0
0·1 1 10 100 1000 10 000 100 000 1 000 000
Matric Suction: kPa
(b)

Figure 3. Water retention curve envelopes for Jurong Formation residual soils (a) measured by Tsaparas (2002) (b) compared with data
from Agus et al. (2001, 2003) (UP-1 corresponds to a depth of 4·0 m and UP-3 to a depth of 5·6 m)

data reported by Agus et al. (2003) and the predictions. The It can be seen from Figure 4 that there is a lack of information on
Green and Corey (1971) method, based on the Tsaparas (2002) experimental data near the air entry of value of the soil (below a
water retention curve shown in Figure 3(b), gave a curve closest matric suction of 20 kPa). Therefore, the Green and Corey (1971)
to the experimental results but was still very different (Figure 4). equation was used to estimate the unsaturated coefficient of
This indicates the danger in using such expressions without an permeability values near the air entry value up to the matric
experimental confirmation of their validity. suction of 20 kPa by using the water retention curve shown in

Table 1. The hydraulic parameters for each soil layer of the slope
Van Genuchten parameters for the water retention curves
Soil layer Description ksat: m/s Wetting Drying
a m n a m n
1 Silty to sandy clay 6 × 10−7 a 3·36 0·319 1·47 3·30 0·075 1·08
2 Clayey silt with siltstone and sandstone 6 × 10−8 3·36 0·319 1·47 3·30 0·075 1·08
a
For the surface desiccated upper part of the layer, a value of ksat = 5 × 10−5 m/s was adopted

You might also like