INDEX

1. Death certificate of A.V. Ranga Rao issued by office of the gram

Panchayat Theegalagultapally Mandal, Karimnagar dist A.P. which is
register for 2013.
2. Letter to the respected Hon’ble chief minister, A.P. Hyd. From AV.
Ranga Rao Regarding Re-in-state of Ranga Rao in to service. Ranga Rao
was appointed as L.D.C. in the directorate of technical education during
1965 and was promoted as upper divisional clerk during 1972. While he
was working as such, he was placed under suspension by the director of
technical education in 1978 on the allegation that the hand writing on
the type writing case memo of marks issued as passed actually those
candidates failed.
An enquiry was conducted by the tech department on 1987 after passing
9 years suspension period and his allowance has not been continued
beyond 1988.
As per the judgment of A.P. Administrative tribunal read with judgment
varadha Rao v state of Karnataka. He cannot be treated as having been
continued under suspension.
Then the director of tech. education submitted proposals to government
regarding allowances from 1988, so far no action submitted by the
director of tech. education.
Therefore Ranga Rao requested the chief minister for Re-in-state him in
to service for his family lively hood.
3. Procs.no.C1-5/6792/75, dt: 13.7.1977.A.P. Ministerial Service- Sri
T.B.M. Prasad, L.D. Clerk, college of Anantapur (under suspension)-show
cause notice issued and explanation received-orders issued.
4. In the court of the chief Metropolitan sessions Judge Hyd, Crl.A.No.
Of 1984. Typed copy of the judgment in C.C.NO.198/83, dt: 3-3-1984 of
VI Metropoliten Magistrate Hyd.
5. Proceedings of the director of technical education A.P. Hyd.
Procs.No.C4/2782/78. Dated: 26-12-1987.
Order:
By orders of the government issued in Govt. order read above, Govt
reviewed the case of A.V.Ranga Rao, U.D. Clerk of the office who is
placed under suspension pending enquiry and have decided to continue
them under suspension for a further period of 6 months from 1-10-1987
to 31-3-1988 or until the enquiry against them is finally disposed off
whichever is earlier.
6. Govt. of A.P. department of technical education, Lr.No.FI-
5/347/2014; Dated: 16-05-2014, letter from Sri. Ajay Jain., IAS,
department of technical education A.P., Hyd., to the principal
secretary to Govt. Higher Education department, Hyd. Regarding,
request to the Govt. to kindly examine the request of Smt A. Kamala Devi
W/o Late Sri A.V. Ranga Rao who was under suspension since
16.01.1978 for the sanction of pension and appointment of her son in
the department of tech. educational and issue such orders as deemed
appropriate in the matter, so as to enable this office to submit a detailed
report to the AP state legal services authority on the petition filed by her.
7. Govt. of A.P. department of technical education, Lr.No.FI-
5/347/2014; Dated: 21.05.2014, letter from Sri. Ajay Jain., IAS,
department of technical education A.P., Hyd., to the administrative
officer, A.P. State Legal services Authority, hyd. Regarding, a detailed
report was submitted to Govt. to examine the request of the petitioner
Smt. Kamala Devi W/o Late Ranga Rao and to issue orders in the matter
so as to submit a detailed report to the A.P. state legal services authority
on the petition of Smt A. Kamala Devi. The orders are awaited from the
Govt in the matter.
 Therefore, request to apprise the same to the chairman and grant time
for a further period of at least 3 months so as to examine and submit a
detailed report in the matter.
8. Govt. of the Telangana department of technical education, Lr.No.FI-
5/347/2014; Dated: 17.06.2014, letter from Smt. Shailaja
Ramaiyer., IAS commissioner of technical education, Telangana,
hyd. To the principal secretary to Govt. higher education
department Telangana. Regarding, enclosing herewith a copy of the
proposal sent to the Govt earlier vide this office letter under reference 2 nd
cited, addressed to the united state of A.P, to request Govt. to kindly
examine the proposal and issue such orders as deemed appropriate in
the matter, as the petition is posted for further hearing on 17.07.2014 by
the A.P State legal service authority.
9. Govt. of the Telangana department of technical education, Lr.No.FI-
5/347/2014; Dated: 24.12.2016, letter from Sri U.V.S.N. Murthy,
M.Tech. Director Incharge department of technical education,
Telangana, hyd. To the special chief secretary to Govt. higher
education department Telangana. Regarding, enclosing herewith a
copy of the proposal sent to the Govt earlier vide this office letter under
reference 6th cited, addressed to the principal secretary of the united
state of Andhra Pradesh, to request Govt. to kindly examine the proposal
and issue such orders as deemed appropriate in the matter, as the
petition is posted for further hearing on 27.12.2016 by the Telangana
State legal service authority.
10. Govt. of the Telangana department of technical education,
Lr.No.FI-5/347/2014; Dated: 24.12.2016, letter from Sri U.V.S.N.
Murthy, M.Tech. Director Incharge department of technical
education, Telangana, hyd. To the special chief secretary to Govt.
higher education department Telangana. Regarding, with reference to
the notice 3rd cited, this office has requested the Govt. to issue necessary
 orders on consideration for sanction of pension in respect Smt. Kamala
Devi w/o Late Sri A.V. Ranga Rao Sr.Asst. (under suspension) O/o the
CTE, AP. In this connection, a letter has been addressed to the Govt. vide
this office letter under reference 3rd cited reiterating the request based on
the detailed report already submitted to Govt. vide this office letter 2 nd
cited stating the further hearing posted on 27.12.2016. The orders of the
Govt. in the matter are still awaited. In the circumstances to request the
authority to kindly grant some more time for further hearing in the case.
11. Office of the Telangana state legal services authority nyaya
seva sadan, purani haveli, Hyd-500002 from administrative officer.
Notice:
Smt. Kamala Devi, family pensioner has filed a petition regard to his
pension matter. The said matter is referred to the permanent&
continuous Lokadalut bench for pension cases for its consideration.
The next sitting of the said bench is proposed to be held at 11:00 a.m. on
10-07-2018 in the premises of the Telangana state legal services
authority. You are advised to appear before the said Lok Adalat bench on
10-07-2018 at 11.00 AM either in person or through advocate to put
forth your case in the matter for its consideration.

12. Letter from T. Harish Rao minister for irrigation, marketing

and legislative affairs, to Sri Kadiyam Srihari Garu, Hon’ble deputy
chief minister for education Govt. of Telangana,
Hyd.D.O.Lr.No.163/2018, Dt: 16.03.2018, T. Harish Rao forwarding
here with the representation of Kamala Devi W/o Late Ranga Rao, where
in submitted that, her husband joined as LDC in director of Tech.
Education on 31.07.1965 and promoted as UDC on 16.01.1972 later
suspended w.e.f 16.01.1978 on different issues. In this regard, a police
case was registered and convicted as per the orders dt.3009.1991 of
Hon’ble Court Metropolitan Magistrate, the individual filed an appeal
 before the Hon’ble High Court against the said orders and obtained bail.
Due to ill-health Mr.A.V.Ranga Rao stayed in the house and his date of
retirement was 30.01.2001. There are no further orders received either
from court, police or department in this regard. Her husband was
expired on 19.02.2013.
The petitioner further informed that, the case was disposed off in favor of
her husband but the department not informed in this read to them, she
knows the matter when she enquired in the department unofficially.
Therefore the petitioner filed a case before Lokadalut on 22.11.2013 and
commissioner, tech education informed the lokadalut vide reference in
21.03.2014 to examine the request of Kamala Dev, W/o Late Ranga Rao
who was under suspension since 16.01.1978 for sanction of pension and
appointment of her son in the department of tech. education and issue
such orders as deemed appropriate in this matter. The petitioner
requested for sanction of pension and provides compassionate
appointment to his son.
In view of the above, T. Harish Rao requested that necessary orders may
kindly be issued to the concerned authorities to examine the
representation and take necessary action on humanitarian grounds.
13. In the court of the VI Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad,
C.C.No.198 OF 1981,

Judgment:

The Ranga Rao convicted and sentence to undergo R.I. for a period of one year
for the offence under section 120-B I.P.C and to undergo R.I. for a period of 2
years for the offence under section 467 I.P.C. convicted him under section
248(ii) of Cr. P.C. With the allegations as follows:

The inspector of police, C.B.C.I.D. filed a charge sheet against Ranga Rao for
the allegations that there was complaint by the director of technical education
and training about the theft of blank printed forms of certified copies of marks
of typewriting and accountancy courses from his office and in this connection a
case in Cr.No.85/78 was registered by Narayanaguda P.S. and investigation
was made over to C.B.C.I.D. during the course of investigation on reliable
information that the investigation has established that the accused Ranga Rao
are punishable for the offences under sections 120-B, 467, 471 and 420 IPC.

After the appearance of accused Ranga Rao copies of documents were supplied
to him and he was examined under section 239 Cr.P.C. when the charge under
sections 120B, 467, 465 and 471 and 420 IPC were framed against Ranga Rao
and explained to him and he pleaded not guilty.

14. In the court of the addl. Metropolitan sessions judge,

Hyderabad. Crl.Appeal.No42/1984.

Judgment:

The accused Ranga Rao filed criminal appeal No. 42/84 in the calendar case
no.198/81, on the file of the 6 th metropolitan magistrate Hyderabad, against
his conviction for the offences under sections 120-B IPC and 467 IPC
sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 1 year for the offence of under u/sec
120-B IPC and to undergo RI for a period of 2 years u/sec. 467 IPC. Both the
sentences are ordered to run concurrently. In this it is the case of the
prosecution that accused Ranga Rao worked as U.D.C in B section from 1974
to 1977 and later on in C section till he was placed under suspension in the
directorate of technical education and training, Hyderabad. The directorate of
technical education deals with the technical and non- technical courses. The
non- technical courses are such as typewriting, shorthand and accountancy.
The directorate conducts the examinations for the non- technical courses twice
in a year and issues to the candidates the diploma and certified copies of the
marks. If the accused Ranga Rao entered into criminal conspiracy, according to
which the accused should prepare false documents (certified copies of marks)
pertaining to the typewriting qualifications of showing to have passed the
typewriting higher and lower examination and thereafter to use the forged
documents of passed candidates to secure the job as typist, by inducing the
concerned authorities to believe these documents are genuine and appoint as
such candidates.

According to the prosecution accused Ranga Rao forged documents. But there
is no direct evidence in this case that accused forced these documents. There is
practically no evidence that candidate who passed the exam approached
accused at any time for the preparation of forged documents or that she had
any hand in the preparation of the forged documents. Therefore, there is no
evidence that accused sent these documents.

For a criminal conspiracy at least there must be 2 or more persons. Criminal

conspiracy is defined under sec 120-IPC. It says that when 2 or more persons
agreed to do or cause to be done an illegal act, or an act which is not illegal by
illegal means, such an agreement is designated by criminal conspiracy. Since
there is no evidence against accused Ranga Rao committed the offences and to
prove that there are two or more persons for this criminal conspiracy and the
conviction of Ranga Rao for the offence u/sec.120-B is liable to be set aside.

On consideration of the material record, accused Ranga Rao is guilty of the

offence u/sec. 467 IPC and not guilty of the offence u/sec. 120-B IPC.

In the result pertaining to accuse his conviction the sentence for the offence
u/sec 120-B IPC set aside and he is acquitted for the 467 IPC is confirmed.

Hence accused Ranga Rao in this case is a young man and there is no evidence
that he was previously involved in the offences like this and the sentence of 2
years is reduced to 1 year R.I. with this modification of the sentence, then the
appeal filed by Ranga Rao against the conviction for the offence u/sec 467 IPC
is dismissed, and the appeal with regard to his conviction and sentence for the
offence under sec 120-B IPC is allowed.

15. In the high court of A.P. Hyd, Crl.R.C.NO.481 of 1984.

Between petitioner Ranga Rao and Respondent state of A.P. criminal revision
case u/s 397 & 401 Cr.p.c. to revise the judgment in Cr.p.c No. 42/84 on the
file of the court of the Addl. Metropolitan sessions judge, Hyd preferred against
the order in C.C.No.198/81 on the file of the court of the VI Metropoliten
Magistrate, Hyd.

Order:

The criminal revision case is dismissed.

Service Report Year

Name of the govt. employee Sri. Ranga Rao

Post held: L.D.C (Lower divisional 1965
clerk).
Promoted: U.D.C ( upper divisional 1972
clerk)
Qualification: B.Com
Date of entry into and length of 31-7-1965( 3 years 7 months)
service in the present scale of pay.

80-4-100-5-150
Scale of pay

19-3-1969
Date of entry in revised scale of pay

90-4-130-6-160
Revised scale of pay

Temporary
Whether substantive or officiating

Enquiry report of the officer in the

year: for the theft of blank memo of
1977
marks of typewriting from the office
of directorate of tech. education.

1978
Suspended in the year

Year
Orders & Judgments

In the court of the VI Metropolitan 1981

Grounds for compassionate
benefit and Retirement benefits year

The date of birth of the

petitioner’s husband 1943

Suspended in the year 1978

payment of subsistence
allowance 1988

up to

The age of superannuation of (58)

2001
years would have retired from
Govt. service on superannuation
in the year.

19.02.2013.
Petitioner’s husband expired in
the year

Petition filed by Smt. Kamala

2014
Devi w/o of late Ranga Rao,
seeking sanction of family
pension and appointment of her
son in this department.
Grounds for compassionate appointment and retirement benefits:

Compassionate appointment:

Compassionate Appointment is a social security scheme launched by the

Government of India to grant appointment to a dependent family member on a
compassionate basis when a Government servant dies while in service or
retires on medical grounds. The Objective of the scheme is to provide
immediate financial assistance to the family who is left in poverty and without
any means to sustain their livelihood.

Eligibility:

 The family is impecunious and deserves prompt financial support.

 Dependent family members applying for compassionate appointment

should be eligible and suitable for the post under the relevant
Recruitment Rules.

Can an appointment on compassionate grounds be granted by courts?

In Life Insurance Corporation of India V. Mrs. Asha Ramchandra Ambekar, the

Supreme Court of India held that Administrative Tribunals and High Courts
can direct the Competent Authority/ concerned Department for considering the
claim but cannot give direction for appointment on compassionate grounds. 

Retirement benefits of deceased Govt. service:

The family pension under Rule 54 of the CCS (Pension) Rules is in the nature
of a welfare scheme framed to provide relief to the widowed spouse & children
of a deceased employee or pensioner.

Under Article 351, CSR [Rule 8, CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972] future good
conduct is an implied condition of the grant of every pension and Government
has the right to withhold or withdraw a pension or any part of it if the
pensioner is convicted of a serious crime or found guilty of grave misconduct.
Family Pension is payable to the survivors of Government servant in the event
of death of the Government servant while in service and also after retirement
from public service (vide Rule 50).

It is payable at the rate of 30% of the pay last drawn by the deceased
employee. If the Government servant had rendered not less than seven years of
continuous service, the rate of family pension payable to the family pension
payable to the family shall be equal to 50% of pay last drawn and the amount
so admissible shall be payable from the date of death of the Government for a
period of seven years or till the date on which the government servant would
have reached the age of 65 years had he been alive whichever is earlier.