Professional Documents
Culture Documents
When relationships are fore grounded by people with immoral or unethical agendas, rather
than strength of conviction, tragedy may eventuate. Reverend Samuel Parris desires “golden
candlesticks”, a “house” and the obedience of the “stiff-necked people”, which that he can
demand as the representative of “the word of God”, highlighting his relationship with the
Salemites as a materialistic transaction where he profits from the gruelling “labor...from
dawn...to...night” of people like John Proctor, reflecting an imbalanced power dynamic which
“was the reason...for [the powerless’] sufferings”. When repressed, individuals will often
retaliate; the Salem witch trials that which lead to “abandoned cattle...on the high roads”
demonstrate the apparent hole the trials have punctured punched in the community’s power
structure and function. Through the downfall of Salem, Miller suggests that the selfishness of
one person can be all-encompassing, thus advising against inauthentic relationships and as well
as structures based around dictatorships or oligarchies in line with his allegorical play aimed at
the misdeeds of 1950s MacCarthyism. At a parallel to Parris, the snobbish women of Dungatar
see others as tools for gaining power. Tilly’s clients’ requests were to “make me look better than
everyone”, evincing that their superficial desires to solely impress and elevate their social status
are intrinsic to their characters. Furthermore, Nancy blankly demands to Tilly, “‘See this? That’s
what I want’”, the lack of interaction with Tilly elucidates her social exclusion, highlighting
pathetic and petty classist assertions and “airs'' so ingrained that treating outcasts as human is
impossible, presenting a deeper resentment than Parris’ regard of Salemites as a “stiff-necked”
collective. Tilly’s frustration at being ridiculed culminates in her setting a “fire [that] billowed
from...the doors and windows” of Dungatar, likewise to the simmering powder keg of grievances
that explode in the form of the Salem witch trials, highlighting Ham’s cynical belief that no good
can be salvaged from parasitic relationships prevalent in insular, conservative Australian
communities, similar to Miller’s disdain for the self-serving powerful. Therefore Relationships
that are superficial, judgmental and parastic can culminate in disaster and even
community-wide destruction if the people are not strong enough to deal with the negativity.
superficial relationships are parasitic, often culminating in destruction.
E1: “golden candlesticks”, “house”, obedience “stiff-necked” ; “word of God” ; “labor...from
dawn...to...night” ; “was the reason for [the powerless’] sufferings”
E2: “abandoned cattle...on the high roads”
E1: “make me look better than everyone”
E2: “See this? That’s what I want” ; “airs” ; ->”stiff-necked”
E3: “fire [that] billowed from...the doors and windows”
Guilt can control societies:
When people reconcile with each other, such restoration of relationships is powerful as it repairs
individual brokenness and a sense of identity. In the case of parents and children, reignited
bonds can be not only cathartic, but life changing. In The Crucible, Molly has “lost a baby”
like Tilly, a fact that encourages them to admit that they are “sorry, so sorry...to each other”,
their shared tragedy overcomes their long-held misunderstanding and separation “over the
years”, and culminates in a cathartic release when they finally reforge their maternal relationship.
Indeed, forgiveness between the two is elucidated to be powerful as even though Molly dies, she
“smile[s] a silver smile” in Tilly’s dream, highlighting that Molly - unlike “everyone [she has]
touched” - is not a painful reminder of her “curse”, but a newfound source of strength that “fills
her heart”. Through this, Ham postulates that the qualities of trust and honesty which manifest in
reconciliation, can repair the internal fragmentation caused by tragedy, by absolving their self-
blame a key idea taken up by Miller in his play. After not having “laid eyes” on each other for
three months, contemplation allows the two to realize that forgiveness is “not for [Elizabeth] to
give” as she is guilty of having kept a “cold house”. Their love is physically and forcibly
separated - like Tilly and Molly - allowing them to comprehend their own faults and
transgressions, stimulating a desire to sincerely converse with each other, through which Proctor
comes to understand that his inner brokenness and dissatisfaction with his marriage is because he
has “regard[ed] himself as a kind of fraud”. In doing so, Miller highlights that reconciliation
allows individuals to restore their original sense of internal peace and confidence, whilst Ham
underscores how reconciliation can provide an unprecedented source of strength. Ultimately, in
relationships, the power of reconciliation lies in its capacity to psychologically and emotionally
restore individuals, as well as bathing individuals with the self-love that have repressed
themselves of their whole lives.
Oppressive environments:
In conservative communities social norms will reflect toxic and insular attitudes that can have
deep impacts on individuals who do not conform. The social norms can come out of theocratic
communities like Salem or small-minded, vindictive towns like Dungatar. In The Crucible, Abigail
Williams desires John Proctor “who put knowledge in [her] heart”, but The Commandments “bid
[her] tear the light out of [her] eyes” and she is conflicted. The theocratic Salem, forcing sexual
conduct to follow strict societal rules and expectations. In such a society, Abigail’s sensual,
impassioned desire for Proctor is oppressed by “the Word of God”, which Salemites hold to be
absolute law. Abigail believes “a promise is made in any bed”, and has her hopes crushed as
her nature demands her to be a voracious lover, yet Proctor declares he will never “reach for
[her] again”, thus unwilling to continue their affair, leaving Abigail without employment as well as
a partner. On a parallel to Salem, the residents of Dungatar are riddled with conservative,
stereotypical attitudes towards sexuality. “Nancy Pickett [lies]...on Ruth’s thin thigh” when the
“exchange [stands] quiet”, but they “scramble” in the presence of Beula, reflecting conservative
attitudes to sex and the desire for small-minded people to pry. Through Nancy and Ruth’s
relationship, Ham is determined to highlight the suppression and concealment of relationships
that were considered immoral. Similarly, Abigail’s illicit affair, is not only a sin, but is the “crime
of lechery” giving Danforth’s words in court a legal as well as moral power. Sergeant Farrat
sensuously “burie[s] his face into” yards of “brilliant...silk organza” in Tilly’s kitchen, revealing his
almost physical attraction towards clothes. The isolated setting of Dungatar in rural Australia in
the 1950s meant that fashion was not only for feminine interest, but dowdy in “gingham” before
Tilly arrives with her modern, unprecedented, “brilliant...organza” and “brocade”, evincing that
just like their fashion, Dunagatar is stuck in the past. It is their inability to change that fuels such
narrow-minded judgement of people, such that Sergeant Farrat is forced to wear “his navy skirt”
in “the dimness” of his office. Although both Dungatar and Salem maintained conservative views
towards sexuality and individual identity, Ham elucidates Dungatar’s apparent lagging behind
the social norms of urbanised Australian communities, as whilst there are “men dressed as
women” in Sydney, Dungatar would shun such individuals. Therefore, conservative societies
that are secluded and insular may fiercely repress those who challenge their way of life.
Extra ideas:
Love/lust has varying intensities