You are on page 1of 1

Suneel Kumar Shukla & Ors. V. Rajeev Shukla & Ors.

NOTE

Question of Law

1) Whether the HC could have decided special appeal 599 of 2010 against the petitioners
when they had preferred Special Appeal No. 486 before the HC against the judgement
of learned single judge of the Hon’ble High Court?
2) Whether the HC should have taken into consideration that the appointment of
petitioners was on adhoc basis and has nothing to do with the advertisement dated
18.07.2000 nor with the recruitment test, selection and appointment of stenographers
in the district judgeship.
3) Whether the Hon’ble HC erred in not considering that petitioners herein were not
appointed on the basis of select and waiting list dated 21.09.2000?
4) Whether the HC failed to appreciate that the appointment of petitioners indirectly
cropped up in then writ petition filed by Respondent No.1

Statutory Provision

1) Rule 14 of the Subordinate Civil Courts Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1947

ADDITIONAL POINTS

Hence, aggrieved from the impugned judgement, the petitioners have preferred an
SLP against the judgement dated 23.02.2018 seeking grant of special leave to appeal
against the order dated 23.02.2018 passed by the Allahabad High Court.

You might also like