Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Study On Income Tax Planning in India
A Study On Income Tax Planning in India
A Project Submitted to
University of Mumbai for partial completion of the degree of
Bachelor in Commerce (Financial Markets)
Under the Faculty of Commerce
Roll No. 50
March 2022
1
Declaration
I, the undersigned MR. DIPESH PRAKASH SHARMA hereby, declare that the work
embodied in the project work titled “A STUDY ON INCOME TAX PLANNING IN
INDIA” form my own contribution to the research work carried out under the guidance of
Prof. RAHUL MEHRA. It is the result of my own research work and has not been submitted
to any other University for any other degree/ Diploma to this or any other university. Wherever
reference has been made to previous works of other, it has been clearly indicated as such and
included in the bibliography I, here by further declare that all the information of this documents
has been obtained and present in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct.
2
M.L. Dahanukar College of Commerce
Dixit Road,
Vile Parle (E)
Mumbai - 400 057
Certificate
This is to certify that Mr. DIPESH PRAKASH SHARMA has worked and duly completed
his project work for the degree of bachelor and commerce
(Financial Markets) under the faculty of commerce in the subject of financial markets and
his project entitled “A STUDY ON INCOME TAX PLANNING
IN INDIA” under my supervision.
I further certify that the entire work has been done by the learner under my guidance and
that no part of it has been
submitted previously for any degree Diploma of any university.
It is his own work and facts reported by his personal findings and investigations.
_____________________ _______________________
PROJECT GUIDE EXTERNAL EXAMINER
_______________ _______________
COURSE COORDINATOR PRINCIPAL
3
Acknowledgement
To list who all have helped me is difficult because they are so numerous and the
depth is so enormous.
I would like to acknowledge the following as being idealistic channels and fresh
dimensions in the completion of this project.
I take this opportunity to thank the University of Mumbai for giving me chance to do
this project.
I would like to thank my I/C Principal Dr. D. M. Doke, for providing the necessary
facilities required for completion of this project.
I take this opportunity to thank our Coordinator CMA Sarvottam Rege, for his
moral support and guidance.
I would also like to express my sincere gratitude towards my project guide
Prof. Rahul Mehra whose guidance and care made this project successful.
I would like to thank my College Library, for having provided various reference
books and magazines related to my project.
Lastly, I would like to thank each and every person who directly or indirectly helped me in the
completion of my project especially my Parents and Peers who supported me throughout my
project
4
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................
Abstract.................................................................................................................................................................
Need for Study......................................................................................................................................................
Objectives...........................................................................................................................................................
Scope & Limitations............................................................................................................................................
CHAPTER 2.......................................................................................................................................................
AN EXTRACT FROM INCOME TAX ACT, 1961...........................................................................................
Tax Regime in India............................................................................................................................................
Chargeability of Income Tax...............................................................................................................................
Scope of Total Income........................................................................................................................................
Total Income.......................................................................................................................................................
Concepts used in Tax Planning...........................................................................................................................
Tax Evasion.........................................................................................................................................................
Tax Avoidance....................................................................................................................................................
Tax Planning.......................................................................................................................................................
Tax Management.................................................................................................................................................
To sum up all these four expressions, we may say that:..................................................................................
The Income Tax Equation:..................................................................................................................................
CHAPTER 3.......................................................................................................................................................
COMPUTATION OF TOTAL INCOME...........................................................................................................
Income from Salaries..........................................................................................................................................
Advance Salary:..............................................................................................................................................
Arrears of Salary:............................................................................................................................................
Bonus:.............................................................................................................................................................
Pension:...........................................................................................................................................................
Profits in lieu of salary:...................................................................................................................................
Allowances from Salary Incomes........................................................................................................................
Dearness Allowance/Additional Dearness (DA):............................................................................................
City Compensatory Allowance (CCA):...........................................................................................................
House Rent Allowance (HRA):...........................................................................................................................
Academic Allowance:.....................................................................................................................................
Conveyance Allowance:......................................................................................................................................
Income from House Property..............................................................................................................................
Incomes Termed as House Property Income:..................................................................................................
Incomes Excluded from House Property Income:...............................................................................................
Annual Value:.....................................................................................................................................................
Annual Value of Let-out Property:......................................................................................................................
Deductions from House Property Income:..........................................................................................................
5
Other than self-occupied properties.....................................................................................................................
Interest on Borrowed Capital:.............................................................................................................................
Amounts not deductible from House Property Income:......................................................................................
Self Occupied Properties.....................................................................................................................................
Capital Gains......................................................................................................................................................
Capital Asset:......................................................................................................................................................
Transfers Resulting in Capital Gains...................................................................................................................
Year of Taxability:..............................................................................................................................................
Classification of Capital Gains:...........................................................................................................................
Long Term Capital Gain:....................................................................................................................................
Period of Holding a Capital Asset:......................................................................................................................
Computation of Capital Gains:............................................................................................................................
Full Value of Consideration:...............................................................................................................................
Cost of Acquisition:............................................................................................................................................
Cost of Improvement:.........................................................................................................................................
Indexed cost of Acquisition/Improvement:.........................................................................................................
Rates of Tax on Capital Gains:...........................................................................................................................
Long-term Capital Gains.....................................................................................................................................
Capital Loss:.......................................................................................................................................................
Set Off and Carry Forward of Capital Loss.........................................................................................................
Capital Gains Exempt from Tax:........................................................................................................................
Capital Gains from Transfer of Agricultural Land..............................................................................................
Capital Gains from Compulsory Acquisition of Industrial Undertaking.............................................................
Capital Gains from an Asset other than Residential House.................................................................................
Tax Planning for Capital Gains...........................................................................................................................
Profits and Gains of Business or Profession........................................................................................................
Income from Business or Profession:..................................................................................................................
Expenses Deductible from Business or Profession:.............................................................................................
Set Off and Carry Forward of Business Loss:.....................................................................................................
Income from Other Sources................................................................................................................................
Other Sources......................................................................................................................................................
Illustrative List....................................................................................................................................................
Deductions from Income from Other Sources:....................................................................................................
CHAPTER 4.......................................................................................................................................................
DEDUCTIONS FROM TAXABLE INCOME...................................................................................................
Deduction under section 80C..........................................................................................................................
80C..................................................................................................................................................................
Deduction under section 80CCC.....................................................................................................................
Deduction under section 80D..........................................................................................................................
6
Deduction under section 80DD.......................................................................................................................
Deduction under section 80DDB....................................................................................................................
Deduction under section 80E..........................................................................................................................
Deduction under section 80G..........................................................................................................................
Deduction under section 80GG.......................................................................................................................
Deduction under section 80GGA....................................................................................................................
Deduction under section 80CCE.....................................................................................................................
CHAPTER 5.......................................................................................................................................................
Tax Evasion Estimates by Surveyed Respondents..........................................................................................
4. The Relationship Between Compliance and Compliance Costs: Survey Results........................................
CONCLUSION...................................................................................................................................................
BIBLIOGRAPHY...............................................................................................................................................
Books:.............................................................................................................................................................
7
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
• Abstract
• Objectives
Abstract
The Income Tax Act of 1961 oversees the taxation of money earned in India as
well as income earned by Indians living abroad. The purpose of this research is to
provide a clear and basic knowledge of the taxes structure of an individual's income
in India for the assessment year 2007-08.
All of the content in this study is based on the Income Tax Act of 1961, and the tax
saving ideas presented are the result of an analysis of current market options. Every
individual should be aware that tax planning is lawful in order to take advantage of
all of the incentives offered by the Government of India under various statutes.
In last some years of my career and education, I have seen my colleagues and faculties
grappling with the taxation issue and complaining against the tax deducted by their
employers from monthly remuneration. Not equipped with proper knowledge of taxation
and tax saving avenues available to them, they were at mercy of the HR/Admin
8
departments which never bothered to do even as little as take advise from some good tax
consultant
This prodded me to study this aspect leading to this project during my MBA course with
the university, hoping this concise yet comprehensive write up will help this salaried
individual assessee class to save whatever extra rupee they can from their hard-earned
monies.
Objectives
• To study taxation provisions of The Income Tax Act, 1961 as amended by Finance Act,
2007.
• To explore and simplify the tax planning procedure from a layman’s perspective.
o This project studies the tax planning for individuals assessed to Income Tax.
o The study relates to non-specific and generalized tax planning, eliminating the need
of sample/population analysis.
o Basic methodology implemented in this study is subjected to various pros & cons,
o This study may include comparative and analytical study of more than one tax
o This study covers individual income tax assessees only and does not hold good for
9
corporate taxpayers.
o The tax rates, insurance plans, and premium are all subject to FY 2007-08 only.
CHAPTER 2
o Total Income
• Tax Evasion
• Tax Avoidance
• Tax Planning
10
Tax Regime in India
The tax regime in India is currently governed under The Income Tax, 1961 as amended
by The Finance Act, 2007 notwithstanding any amendments made thereof by recently
As per Income Tax Act, 1961, income tax is charged for any assessment year at
prevailing rates in respect of the total income of the previous year of every person.
Previous year means the financial year immediately preceding the assessment year.
Under the Income Tax Act, 1961, total income of any previous year of a person who is a
such year; or • accrues or arises to him outside India during such year:
Provided that, in the case of a person not ordinarily resident in India, the income which
accrues or arises to him outside India shall not be included unless it is derived from a
11
Total Income
For the purposes of chargeability of income-tax and computation of total income, The
Income Tax Act, 1961 classifies the earning under the following heads of income:
• Salaries
• Capital gains
Tax Evasion
Tax Evasion means not paying taxes as per the provisions of the law or minimizing tax
by illegitimate and hence illegal means. Tax Evasion can be achieved by concealment of
violation of law.
Tax Evasion is an act executed knowingly willfully, with the intent to deceive so that the
tax reported by the taxpayer is less than the tax payable under the law.
12
Example: Mr. A, having rendered service to another person Mr. B, is entitled to receive a
sum of say Rs. 50,000/- from Mr. B. A tells B to pay him Rs. 50,000/- in cash and thus
does not account for it as his income. Mr. A has resorted to Tax Evasion.
Tax Avoidance
Tax Avoidance is the art of dodging tax without breaking the law. While remaining well
within the four corners of the law, a citizen so arranges his affairs that he walks out of the
clutches of the law and pays no tax or pays minimum tax. Tax avoidance is therefore
legal and frequently resorted to. In any tax avoidance exercise, the attempt is always to
squarely in the loophole and thereby minimize the tax. In India, loopholes in the law,
when detected by the tax authorities, tend to be plugged by an amendment in the law, too
often retrospectively. Hence tax avoidance though legal, is not long lasting. It lasts till the
law is amended.
Example: Mr. A, having rendered service to another person Mr. B, is entitled to receive a
sum of say Rs. 50,000/- from Mr. B. Mr. A’s other income is Rs. 200,000/-. Mr. A tells
Mr. B to pay cheque of Rs. 50,000/- in the name of Mr. C instead of in the name of Mr.
A. Mr. C deposits the cheque in his bank account and account for it as his income. But
Mr. C has no other income and therefore pays no tax on that income of Rs. 50,000/-. By
13
Tax Planning
Tax Planning has been described as a refined form of ‘tax avoidance’ and implies
arrangement of a person’s financial affairs in such a way that it reduces the tax liability.
This is achieved by taking full advantage of all the tax exemptions, deductions,
concessions, rebates, reliefs, allowances and other benefits granted by the tax laws so that
the incidence of tax is reduced. Exercise in tax planning is based on the law itself and is
Example: Mr. A having other income of Rs. 200,000/- receives income of Rs. 50,000/-
from Mr. B. Mr. A to save tax deposits Rs. 60,000/- in his PPF account and saves the tax
Tax Management
ideas. While that tax planning is only an idea, a plan, a scheme, an arrangement, tax
management is the actual action, implementation, the reality, the final result.
Example: Action of Mr. A depositing Rs. 60,000 in his PPF account and saving tax of
Rs. 12,000/- is Tax Management. Actual action on Tax Planning provision is Tax
Management.
14
To sum up all these four expressions, we may say that:
• Tax Evasion is fraudulent and hence illegal. It violates the spirit and the
violates only the spirit of the law but not the letter of the law.
• Tax Planning does not violate the spirit nor the letter of the law since it is
The net result of tax reduction by taking action of fulfilling the conditions
For the understanding of any layman, the process of computation of income and tax
liability can be outlined in following five steps. This project is also designed to follow the
same.
schemes.
15
CHAPTER 3
• Capital Gains
16
Income from Salaries
Advance Salary:
Advance salary is taxable in the year it is received. It is not included in the income of
recipient again when it becomes due. However, loan taken from the employer
Arrears of Salary:
Bonus:
Pension:
Pension received by the employee is taxable under ‘Salary’ Benefit of standard deduction
is available to pensioner also. Pension received by a widow after the death of her husband
17
Profits in lieu of salary:
Any compensation due to or received by an employee from his employer or former
Any payment due to or received by an employee from his employer or former employer
or from a provident or other fund to the extent it does not consist of contributions by the
Insurance Policy.
Any amount whether in lump sum or otherwise, due to or received by an assessee from
his employer, either before his joining employment or after cessation of employment.
and exclusively incurred in the performance of special duties unless such allowance is
18
Certain allowances prescribed under Rule 2BB, granted to the employee either to meet
his personal expenses at the place where the duties of his office of employment are
performed by him or at the place where he ordinarily resides, or to compensate him for
HRA received by an employee residing in his own house or in a house for which no rent
is paid by him is taxable. In case of other employees, HRA is exempt up to a certain limit
Entertainment Allowance:
Academic Allowance:
Allowance granted for encouraging academic research and other professional pursuits, or
for the books for the purpose, shall be exempt u/s 10(14). Similarly newspaper allowance
Conveyance Allowance:
It is exempt to the extent it is paid and utilized for meeting expenditure on travel for
official work.
19
Incomes Termed as House Property Income:
The annual value of a house property is taxable as income in the hands of the owner of
the property. House property consists of any building or land, or its part or attached area,
of which the assessee is the owner. The part or attached area may be in the form of a
courtyard or compound forming part of the building. But such land is to be distinguished
from an open plot of land, which is not charged under this head but under the head
‘Income from Other Sources’ or ‘Business Income’, as the case may be. Besides, house
property includes flats, shops, office space, factory sheds, agricultural land and farm
houses.
However, following incomes shall be taxable under the head ‘Income from House
Property'.
1. Income from letting of any farm house agricultural land appurtenant thereto for any
purpose other than agriculture shall not be deemed as agricultural income, but taxable as
2. Any arrears of rent, not taxed u/s 23, received in a subsequent year, shall be taxable
in the year.
Even if the house property is situated outside India it is taxable in India if the owner-
20
The following incomes are excluded from the charge of income tax under this head:
Annual Value:
Income from house property is taxable on the basis of annual value. Even if the property
The annual value of any property is the sum which the property might reasonably be
In determining reasonable rent factors such as actual rent paid by the tenant, tenant’s
of the property, annual rateable value of the property fixed by municipalities, rents of
similar properties in neighbourhood and rent which the property is likely to fetch having
21
Where the property or any part thereof is let out, the annual value of such property or part
shall be the reasonable rent for that property or part or the actual rent received or
In case of a let-out property, the local taxes such as municipal tax, water and sewage tax,
fire tax, and education cess levied by a local authority are deductible while computing the
annual value of the year in which such taxes are actually paid by the owner.
Repairs and collection charges: Standard deduction of 30% of the net annual value of the
property.
(without any limit) as a deduction (on accrual basis). Furthermore, interest payable for
the period prior to the previous year in which such property has been acquired or
constructed shall be deducted in five equal annual instalments commencing from the
22
Amounts not deductible from House Property Income:
Any interest chargeable under the Act payable out of India on which tax has not been
paid or deducted at source and in respect of which there is no person who may be treated
as an agent.
No deduction is allowed under section 24(1) by way of repairs, insurance premium, etc.
in respect of self-occupied property whose annual value has been taken to be nil under
section 23(2) (a) or 23(2) (b) of the act. However, a maximum deduction of Rs. 30,000
after 1.4.1999 and the acquisition or construction of the house property is made within 3
years from the end of the financial year in which capital was borrowed the maximum
deduction for interest shall be Rs. 1,50,000. For this purpose, the assessee shall furnish a
certificate from the person extending the loan that such interest was payable in respect of
23
loan for acquisition or construction of the house, or as refinance loan for repayment of an
property acquired or constructed with funds furrowed on or after 1.4.1999 within 3 years
from the end of the financial year in which the funds are borrowed. In other cases, the
ii. Let out property or part there of: all eligible interests are allowed.
It is, therefore, suggested that a property for self, residence may be acquired with
borrowed funds, so that the annual interest accrual on borrowings remains less than Rs.
1,50,000. The net loss on this account can be set off against income from other properties
If buying a property for letting it out on rent, raise borrowings from other family
members or outsiders. The rental income can be safely passed off to the other family
members by way of interest. If the interest claim exceeds the annual value, loss can be set
At the time of purchase of new house property, the same should be acquired in the
joint names. This is particularly advantageous in case of rented property for division of
24
rental income among various family members. However, each co-owner must invest out
of his own funds (or borrowings) in the ratio of his ownership in the property.
25
Capital Gains
Any profits or gains arising from the transfer of capital assets effected during the
previous year is chargeable to income-tax under the head “Capital gains” and shall be
deemed to be the income of that previous year in which the transfer takes place. Taxation
of capital gains, thus, depends on two aspects – ‘capital assets’ and transfer’.
Capital Asset:
‘Capital Asset’ means property of any kind held by an assessee including property of his
• Relinquishment of assets;
owner of asset;
26
• Transactions involving transfer of membership of a group housing
association of persons;
Year of Taxability:
Capital gains form part of the taxable income of the previous year in which the transfer
giving rise to the gains takes place. Thus, the capital gain shall be chargeable in the year
performance of an agreement to sell, capital gain shall be deemed to have arisen in the
year in which such possession is handed over. If the transferee already holds the
possession of the property under sale, before entering into the agreement to sell, the year
of taxability of capital gains is the year in which the agreement is entered into.
27
Short Term Capital Gain:
Gains on transfer of capital assets held by the assessee for not more than 36 months (12
months in case of a share held in a company or any other security listed in a recognized
stock exchange in India, or a unit of the UTI or of a mutual fund specified u/s
The capital gains on transfer of capital assets held by the assessee for more than 36
months (12 months in case of shares held in a company or any other listed security or a
Generally speaking, period of holding a capital asset is the duration for the date of its
acquisition to the date of its transfer. However, in respect of following assets, the period
transfer.
• Deduct the amount of permissible exemptions u/s 54, 54B, 54D, 54EC,
This is the amount for which a capital asset is transferred. It may be in money or money’s
worth or combination of both. For instance, in case of a sale, the full value of
consideration is the full sale price actually paid by the transferee to the transferor. Where
the transfer is by way of exchange of one asset for another or when the consideration for
the transfer is partly in cash and partly in kind, the fair market value of the asset received
consideration.
In case of damage or destruction of an asset in fire flood, riot etc., the amount of money
or the fair market value of the asset received by way of insurance claim, shall be deemed
2. Transfer Expenses.
Cost of Acquisition:
29
Cost of acquisition is the amount for which the capital asset was originally purchased by
the assessee.
Cost of acquisition of an asset is the sum total of amount spent for acquiring the asset.
Where the asset is purchased, the cost of acquisition is the price paid. Where the asset is
acquired by way of exchange for another asset, the cost of acquisition is the fair market
transaction e.g. brokerage paid, registration charges and legal expenses, is added to price
or value of consideration for the acquisition of the asset. Interest paid on moneys
borrowed for purchasing the asset is also part of its cost of acquisition.
Where capital asset became the property of the assessee before 1.4.1981, he has an option
to adopt the fair market value of the asset as on 1.4.1981, as its cost of acquisition.
Cost of Improvement:
alterations to the capital assets, by the assessee. Betterment charges levied by municipal
authorities also constitute cost of improvement. However, only the capital expenditure
be ignored.
30
For computing long-term capital gains, ‘Indexed cost of acquisition and ‘Indexed cost of
Improvement’ are required to deducted from the full value of consideration of a capital
asset. Both these costs are thus required to be indexed with respect to the cost inflation
Short-term Capital Gains are included in the gross total income of the assessee and after
allowing permissible deductions under Chapter VI-A. Rebate under Sections 88, 88B and
88C is also available against the tax payable on short-term capital gains.
Long-term Capital Gains are subject to a flat rate of tax @ 20% However, in respect of
long term capital gains arising from transfer of listed securities or units of mutual
fund/UTI, tax shall be payable @ 20% of the capital gain computed after allowing
indexation benefit or @ 10% of the capital gain computed without giving the benefit of
Capital Loss:
The amount, by which the value of consideration for transfer of an asset falls short of its
cost of acquisition and improvement /indexed cost of acquisition and improvement, and
31
the expenditure on transfer, represents the capital loss. Capital Loss’ may be short-term
or long-term, as in case of capital gains, depending upon the period of holding of the
asset.
• Any short-term capital loss can be set off against any capital gain (both
• Any long-term capital loss can be set off only against long-term capital
• Any short-term capital loss can be carried forward to the next eight
assessment years and set off against ‘capital gains’ in those years.
• Any long-term capital loss can be carried forward to the next eight
assessment year and set off only against long-term capital gain in those
years.
Any long-term capital gains arising on the transfer of a residential house, to an individual
or HUF, will be exempt from tax if the assessee has within a period of one year before or
two years after the date of such transfer purchased, or within a period of three years
32
Capital Gains from Transfer of Agricultural Land
Any capital gain arising from transfer of agricultural land, shall be exempt from tax, if
the assessee purchases within 2 years from the date of such transfer, any other
agricultural land. Otherwise, the amount can be deposited under Capital Gains Accounts
Scheme, 1988 before the due date for furnishing the return.
Any capital gain arising from the transfer by way of compulsory acquisition of land or
purchases/constructs within three years from the date of compulsory acquisition, any
building or land, forming part of industrial undertaking. Otherwise, the amount can be
deposited under the ‘Capital Gains Accounts Scheme, 1988’ before the due date for
Any long-term capital gain arising to an individual or an HUF, from the transfer of any
asset, other than a residential house, shall be exempt if the whole of the net consideration
is utilized within a period of one year before or two years after the date of transfer for
33
• An assessee should plan transfer of his capital assets at such a time that
capital gains arise in the year in which his other recurring incomes are
flat rate of 20%. Those having income above Rs. 1,50,000 should plan
should so arrange the transfers of capital assets that they fall in the
• An assessee may go for a short-term capital gain, in the year when there
is already a short-term capital loss or loss under any other head that can
u/s 54, 54B, 54D, 54ED, 54EC, 54F, 54G and 54H.
create some short-term capital gain in that year or, defer long-term capital
recurring income but have income from capital gain because the capital
34
gain will be taxed at the flat rate of 20% and thus the clubbing would not
35
Profits and Gains of Business or Profession
be deducted from the firm’s income. Any interest salary etc. which is not
not carrying out activity in relation to any business, or not to share any
36
know-how, patent, copyright, trade-mark, licence, franchise or any other
provision for services except when such sum is taxable under the head
10(10D).
• Any amount withdrawn from the special reserves created and maintained
deductions.
37
• Depreciation is allowed on:
Know how, patents, copyrights, trademarks, licences, franchises or any other business
1.4.1998.
• Development rebate.
assessee shall get his accounts audited from a chartered accountant and
• Scientific Research
One and one-fourth times any sum paid to a scientific research association or an
approved university, college or other institution for the purpose of scientific research,
One and one-fourth times the sum paid to a National Laboratory or a University or an
Indian Institute of Technology or a specified person with a specific direction that the
38
said sum shall be used for scientific research under a programme approved in this
One and one half times, the expenditure incurred up to 31.3.2005 on scientific
notified articles.
in 3 equal instalments.
the period starting from the year in which payment of licence fee is made
or the year in which business commences where licence fee has been paid
before commencement and ending with the year in which the licence
comes to an end.
39
drinking water projects in rural areas and urban slums, construction of
afforestation.
successive years beginning with the year in which the amount is paid.
40
• Insurance premium for stocks or stores.
owned by a member.
• Insurance premium paid for the health of employees by cheque under the
• Any sum received from the employees and credited to the employees
• Provision for bad and doubtful debts made by special reserve created and
nature.
fund, or for payment of gratuity that has become payable during the year.
projects.
42
Expenses deductible for authors receiving income from royalties
during a previous year are less than Rs. 25,000 and where detailed
whichever is less. The above deduction will be allowed without calling for
If there is a loss in any business, it can be set off against profits of any other business in
the same year. The loss, if any, still remaining can be set off against income under any
other head.
However, loss in a speculation business can be adjusted only against profits of another
speculation business. Losses not adjusted in the same year can be carried forward to
subsequent years.
43
Income from Other Sources
Other Sources
This is the last and residual head of charge of income. Income of every kind which is not
to be excluded from the total income under the Income Tax Act shall be charge to tax
under the head Income From Other Sources, if it is not chargeable under any of the other
four heads-Income from Salaries, Income From House Property, Profits and Gains from
Business and Profession and Capital Gains. In other words, it can be said that the
residuary head of income can be resorted to only if none of the specific heads is
applicable to the income in question and that it comes into operation only if the preceding
Illustrative List
Following is the illustrative list of incomes chargeable to tax under the head Income from
Other Sources:
(i) Dividends
chargeable to tax under the head ‘Income from Other Sources”, irrespective of the fact
whether shares are held by the assessee as investment or stock in trade. Dividend is
deemed to be the income of the previous year in which it is declared, distributed or paid.
44
However interim dividend is deemed to be the income of the year in which the amount of
However, any income by way of dividends is exempt from tax u/s10(34) and no tax is
(ii) Income from machinery, plant or furniture belonging to the assessee and let on hire,
if the income is not chargeable to tax under the head Profits and gains of business or
profession;
(iii) Where an assessee lets on hire machinery, plant or furniture belonging to him and
also buildings, and the letting of the buildings is inseparable from the letting of the
said machinery, plant or furniture, the income from such letting, if it is not chargeable
(iv) Any sum received under a Keyman insurance policy including the sum allocated by
way of bonus on such policy if such income is not chargeable to tax under the head
(v)Where any sum of money exceeding twenty-five thousand rupees is received without
after the 1st day of September, 2004, the whole of such sum, provided that this clause
45
(b) On the occasion of the marriage of the individual; or
(vi) Any sum received by the assessee from his employees as contributions to any
provident fund or superannuation fund or any fund set up under the provisions of the
Employees’ State Insurance Act. If such income is not chargeable to tax under the head
(vii) Income by way of interest on securities, if the income is not chargeable to tax under
the head Profits and gains of business or profession. If books of account in respect of
such income are maintained on cash basis then interest is taxable on receipt basis. If
(viii) Other receipts falling under the head “Income from Other Sources’:
46
The income chargeable to tax under this head is computed after making the following
deductions:
1. In the case of dividend income and interest on securities: any reasonable sum paid by
2. In case of income in the nature of family pension: Rs.15, 000or 33.5% of such income,
whichever is low.
4. Any other expenditure (not being a capital expenditure) expended wholly and
CHAPTER 4
48
Deduction under section 80C
This new section has been introduced from the Financial Year 2005-06. Under this section, a
deduction of up to Rs. 1,00,000 is allowed from Taxable Income in respect of investments made in
some specified schemes. The specified schemes are the same which were there in section 88 but
80C
This section is applicable from the assessment year 2006-2007.Under this section 100%deduction
would be available from Gross Total Income subject to maximum ceiling given u/s
49
Notes for Section 80C
1. There are no sectoral caps (except in PPF) on investment in the new section and the assessee
is free to invest Rs. 1,00,000 in any one or more of the specified instruments.
2. Amount invested in these instruments would be allowed as deduction irrespective of the fact
whether (or not) such investment is made out of income chargeable to tax.
3. Section 80C deduction is allowed irrespective of assessee's income level. Even persons with
taxable income above Rs. 10,00,000 can avail benefit of section 80C.
4. As the deduction is allowed from taxable income, the exact savings in tax will depend upon
the tax slab of the individual. Thus, a person in 30% tax stab can save income tax up to Rs.
30,600 (or Rs. 33,660 if annual income exceeds Rs. 10,00,000) by investing Rs. 1,00,000 in
Deduction is allowed for the amount paid or deposited by the assessee during the previous year out
of his taxable income to the annuity plan (Jeevan Suraksha) of Life Insurance Corporation of India
or annuity plan of other insurance companies for receiving pension from the fund referred to in
section 10(23AAB)
Deduction is allowed for any medical insurance premium under an approved scheme of General
company, paid by cheque, out of assessee’s taxable income during the previous year, in respect of
the following
50
In case of an individual – insurance on the health of the assessee, or wife or husband, or dependent
Amount of deduction: Maximum Rs. 10,000, in case the person insured is a senior citizen
(exceeding 65 years of age) the maximum deduction allowable shall be Rs. 15,000/-.
previous year, for the medical treatment training and rehabilitation of one or more dependent
Amount deposited, under an approved scheme of the Life Insurance Corporation or other insurance
company or the Unit Trust of India, for the benefit of a dependent person with disability.
Amount of deduction: the deduction allowable is Rs. 50,000 (Rs. 40,000 for A.Y. 2003-2004) in
aggregate for any of or both the purposes specified above, irrespective of the actual amount of
expenditure incurred. Thus, if the total of expenditure incurred and the deposit made in approved
scheme is Rs. 45,000, the deduction allowable for A.Y. 2004-2005, is Rs. 50,000
51
A resident individual or Hindu Undivided family deduction is allowed in respect of during a year
for the medical treatment of specified disease or ailment for himself or a dependent or a member of
Amount of Deduction Amount actually paid or Rs. 40,000 whichever is less (for A.Y. 2003-2004, a
deduction of Rs. 40,000 is allowable In case of amount is paid in respect of the assessee, or a
person dependent on him, who is a senior citizen the deduction allowable shall be Rs. 60,000.
An individual assessee who has taken a loan from any financial institution or any approved
charitable institution for the purpose of pursuing his higher education i.e. full time studies for any
graduate or post graduate course in engineering medicine, management or for post graduate course
Amount of Deduction: Any amount paid by the assessee in the previous year, out of his taxable
income, by way of repayment of loan or interest thereon, subject to a maximum of Rs. 40,000
Donations:
100 % deduction is allowed in respect of donations to: National Defence Fund, Prime Minister’s
National Relief Fund, Armenia Earthquake Relief Fund, Africa Fund, National Foundation of
In all other cases donations made qualifies for the 50% of the donated amount for deductions.
52
Deduction under section 80GG
Any assessee including an employee who is not in receipt of H.R.A. u/s 10(13A)
In respect of institution or fund referred to in clause (e) or (f) donations made up to 31.3.2002 shall
only be deductible.
This deduction is not applicable where the gross total income of the assessee includes the income
chargeable under the head Profits and gains of business or profession. In those cases, the deduction
A new Section 80CCE has been inserted from FY2005-06. As per this section, the maximum
amount of deduction that an assessee can claim under Sections 80C, 80CCC and 80CCD will be
limited to Rs 100,000.
CHAPTER 5
1 This discrepancy is, if at all, underestimated due to upward adjustment to taxes paid
described in Chattopadhyay and Das-Gupta (2002).
55
actual figures on income and taxes paid without aiming for consistency with figures reported in
their tax returns. These provide the alternative, "bootstrapped", estimates of compliance
presented in Table 4.1. Surprisingly, due to tax savings by salaried respondents, evasion
estimates for them, as a percentage of tax paid turn out to be twice as high as estimates for non-
salary earners.
The next table, Table 4.3, presents subjective probability of detection estimates by surveyed
respondents. These are extremely high compared to objective probabilities, offering some
solace from a revenue perspective.45
Table 4.3: Percentage of tax evading individuals against whom penalty proceedings
are initiated: Opinion of respondents
In numbers Percentage of responses
Salar Non- All Salar y Non- All
y salary salary
0-5 percent 6 0 6 33.33 0.00 24.00
6-10 percent 1 0 1 5.56 0.00 4.00
11-20 percent 2 2 4 11.11 28.57 16.00
21-30 percent 3 1 4 16.67 14.29 16.00
31-40 percent 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
41-50 percent 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
51-75 percent 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
>75 percent 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
No opinion 6 4 10 33.33 57.14 40.00
Average “subjective --- --- --- 23.15 23.81 23.28
detection
probability”
Number of observations 18 7 25
Table 4.4: Tax planning, tax saving and tax evasion (sample averages)
Non-salary Salary Total
Value of hours spent in tax planning (Rs) 505 627 599
Value of total compliance time (Rs) 26880 2086 7614
Tax planning costs as a % of time compliance costs 1.88 30.08 7.87
Money spent on tax planning and research (Rs) 429 189 245
Total money compliance costs (Rs) 15163 921 4683
Tax planning costs as a % of money compliance costs 2.83 18.14 5.24
Total tax planning costs as a percentage of total (time + 12.53 26.44 23.26
money) compliance costs
56
Summary compliance cost statistics from Chattopadhyay and Das-Gupta (2002) are reported in
Table
4.4 along with evasion and avoidance estimates. As can be seen, avoidance costs are small
relative to total compliance costs, especially for non-salaried individuals. However, in contrast
to the theoretical analysis, avoidance costs are not the same as voluntary costs. For example,
engaging an advisor imposes voluntary costs but does not directly result in tax saving. Bribe
costs are high even for salary earners.
45
Das-Gupta and Mookherjee (1998) report an upper bound to the probability of
punishment, up to the penalty initiation stage, of 4.2 percent, even if only 10 percent of
individuals are tax evaders.
Tax planning is beneficial given the substantial tax savings individuals manage to achieve
through tax concessions. Tax savings are likely to be somewhat underestimated, since only
major tax concessions were covered in the questionnaire.
On examination of the full sample, the relationship between avoidance expenditure and tax
evasion or tax saving both turn out to be positive but weak. This is shown inFigures 4.1 and 4.2.
57
4. The Relationship Between Compliance and Compliance Costs: Survey Results
To properly assess the link between compliance or tax revenues and compliance costs,
information should ideally be available on enforcement by tax authorities for different groups
of taxpayers. Of this, important information concerns the incidence and outcome of normal tax
assessments
(“summary assessments”), scrutiny assessments (or tax audits), and effective penalties imposed
after penalty proceedings and appeals. In the initial research design, the use of actual
assessment records of taxpayers, classified by income and occupation, was planned. These data
were to be matched with compliance cost data from the compliance cost survey. However, no
information on income tax assessments was made available for this study. Instead, the data base
consists entirely of survey responses. While this may be appropriate for penalty and
enforcement variables that determine taxpayer compliance behaviour, it cannot be used to
provide accurate estimates of revenue effects. So estimates presented here should be treated as
preliminary and subject to a large margin of error.
Functional form
Three forms of the tax and compliance functions, linear, semi-logarithmic and double log, were
experimented with. The goodness of fit was compared using the R-squared statistic
(computedon a comparable basis) for the “base regressions” or regressions without additional
determinants absent in the theoretical models. For four of the five dependent variables used,
double-log equations were found to have the best fit, while in one case the linear specification
had a marginally better fit. So only double-log regressions are reported below.
Dependent and independent variables
The regression strategy, designed to maximize possible statistical inferences while keeping in
view the limited number of observations, following Sala-I-Martin (1998). Accordingly 4 or 5
basic variables were included in all regression exercises. In extended regressions, besides basic
variables, other variables or groups were entered two at a time from a possible 12 additional
variable groups suggested by theory and 4 socio-demographic variables. Regression variables
are listed and discussed in table 5.1 below.
58
Sl Variable Description Remarks
A. Dependent Variables
A1 Tax paid in rupees Expected signs of impacts of
determinants for this variable are
the opposite of those given here.
60
D. Independent Variables: Socio demographic variables.
D1 Age in years
D2 Female/male dummy variable Female = 1
D3 Education Post grad = 5, no education = 1
D4 Location dummy variables Three variables, one each for Delhi,
other city, and other metro – entered as a
group.
Note: Variables which were omitted or for which no results are reported are in italics.
Results
Basic regression results, without socio-demographic and other variables, are reported in Tables
5.2 to
5.5 and a summary of basic regression results is in Table 5.6. Results for other variables are in
Annex Tables A1 to A4. In basic regressions for tax paid, only in the regression in which the
share of tax planning costs in compliance costs was included did one compliance cost variable,
time compliance costs, turn out to be significant and that too only at the 10percent level.
Furthermore, its estimated impact was positive. In fact, in all regressions compliance cost
variables turned out to have positive signs with one exception. Though the R2 is much poorer
for tax evasion regressions, the “wrong” sign for time compliance cost effects persists. As
mentioned, none of the regressions for own estimates of tax evasion proved to be significant,
so these are not reported. 46
61
Table 5.2 Tax payment and compliance costs
Dependent variable: Tax Legal compliance cost Time and money compliance
paid (Rs). (Rs) cost (Rs)
Double log specification With % share Without % With % share Without %
of8.39
tax Share of tax
8.52 of tax
8.36planning Share of tax
8.44
planning planning planning
Constant -14.55 -14.64 *** -14.54 *** -14.59 ***
Marginal tax rate times *** 1.20 *** 1.15 *** 1.19 ***
10 4
1.14 *** 1.44 *** 1.52 *** 1.45 ***
Income (in 10s of rupees) 1.56 ***
0.10 * 0.04
Time compliance cost
-0.05 0.01
(Rs)
0.03 0.06
Money compliance cost
-0.003 -0.003
(Rs)
Legal compliance cost
(Rs)
Share of tax planning cost
(%)
Regression statistics
Observations (n) 105 134 102 133
R-squared 0.912 0.878 0.914 0.883
R-bar-squared
0.908 0.875 0.910 0.879
F-statistic (k and n-k-1 258.6 0.000 312.5 0.000 205.8 0.000 240.5
d.f.) 0.000
Probability of F Statistic
Mean of dependent
variable
62
Notes:
1. *** Statistically significant at 1% level; ** statistically significant at 5% level; *
statistically significant at 10% level; White Heteroskedasticity Consistent Standard Errors
were used for significance tests.
2. 100 has been added to all rupee variables and to the marginal tax rate so that loss of
observations due to zero values (logarithm is undefined) is avoided.
3. k is the number of independent variables included in the regression apart from the
constant.
46
An alternative specification of both basic and extended regressions was experimented
with by including a "slope" dummy variable for salaried individuals for compliance cost
variables and the "advisor used" dummy variable. The use of slope dummy variables was
motivated by doubts expressed about the results regarding time and money costs, in an
earlier draft of this report, by Professor Michael Godwin, whose important contribution
is gratefully acknowledged. However, results are largely similar for the alternative
specification, though the overall regression significance improves in most cases. Results
are reported in Tables A5 to A13.
63
Table 5.3 Tax evasion and compliance costs (a)
Dependent variable: Legal compliance cost Time and money compliance
Estimated tax evasion (Rs) (Rs) cost (Rs)
Double log specification With % share Without % With % share Without %
of tax Share of tax of tax planning Share of tax
planning planning planning
Constant -7.23 -7.11 -7.51 -7.81
Marginal tax rate times 10 4
-0.18 -0.15 -0.19 -0.16
Income (in 10s of rupees) 1.75 ***
1.35 ** 1.42 ** 1.84 ***
Time compliance cost (Rs)
64
Regression statistics
Observations 106
R-squared
R-bar-squared 0.068
F-statistic (k and n-k-1 0.040
d.f.) 2.48
65
Probability of F Statistic 0.065 4.75
Mean of dependent
66
variable
Note: See the notes below Table 5.2.
67
Regression statistics
Observations 105 134 102 133
R-squared 0.128 0.093 0.132 0.112 0.137 0.092 0.130
R-bar-squared 3.670 6.624 3.065 0.103
F-statistic (k and n-k-1 4.807
d.f.) 0.008 0.000 0.013
Probability of F Statistic 4.61 4.61 4.61 0.000
Mean of dependent 4.61
variable
Note: See the notes below Table 5.2.
69
Time compliance costs: The impact was either found to be insignificant or, in two basic
regressions for tax paid, positive and significant at the 5 percent level. While these costs were
significant in regressions for tax evasion only when the share of tax planning is excluded, the
impact is uniformly negative.2 In extended regressions, these results continue to hold (Table
A1). In fact in regressions on tax paid, the coefficient was positive in all regressions and
significant in 73 percent of regressions.
Money compliance costs: These costs appear to have a negative association with tax
compliance in all 8 significant. However, the coefficient was significant in only 1 regression.
The impact on taxes paid is mixed but negative in the only regression where it is not
insignificant. In extended regressions, these costs
2 To check for possible bias arising from our estimates of the value of time, the impact
of time costs in hours (with specifications otherwise unaltered) was also examined.
Results were remarkably similar.
70
proved to have a negative association with tax compliance in 100 percent of regressions on tax
evasion in rupees or as a percentage of income (Tables A2 and A4). Furthermore coefficients
were significant in a greater number of regressions (35 percent to 49 percent) than time costs.
The lack of a significant effect on taxes paid carries over to extended regressions (Table A1)
and insignificant effects with variable signs are found for regressions for evasion as a
percentage of tax paid (Table A3).
Time + money compliance costs: As will be obvious from the discussion above, this
specification performs worse than when the two cost components are included separately. This
suggests that either the two cost components do not have identical effects or that time cost
estimates or their valuation may be unreliable. To discriminate between these possibilities,
further work is needed.
Overall, therefore, time and money compliance costs may have opposite effects on
compliance and revenue, with the former having a positive impact and the latter having a
negative effect. The inference for money costs is statistically more reliable than that for time
costs, though overall statistical reliability is not very high. Further evidence is needed before
this conclusion can be taken to be reliable.
That evasion is, by and large, related negatively to time and legal compliance costs could be
due to one of two reasons. First, saving compliance costs may motivate tax evasion. Second,
tax evaders have lower compliance costs because they are less compliant. 48 This possible
simultaneity issue is not tackled in the analysis above and must await better data
becomingavailable.
Use of tax advisors: Proved to have a negative impact on tax compliance in all regressions,
being significant in 100 percent of regressions of tax evasion as a percentage of taxes paid and
in 50 percent of regressions of evasion as a percentage of income. This finding is consistent
with the negative impact of tax advisors on tax compliance by US taxpayers in Erard (1993).
This negative impact, albeit tentative, suggests that tax advisors do not merely facilitate tax
avoidance but also tax evasion. However, there was no significant impact on taxes paid,
though, in partial contradiction to compliance effects, the (insignificant) impact on taxes paid
was positive in 90 percent of regressions.
Bribes: Very few regressions with this variable proved to be viable, with none surviving
selection criteria for 2 of the 3 tax evasion variables. Nevertheless, bribe costs had a
significant negative association with tax compliance in 100 percent of regressions for evasion
as a percentage of gross income. The impact on tax payment, though negative in 90 percent of
cases, was invariably insignificant.
“Stability” “Ambiguity” and “Govt. services: Benefit”: None of these “psychic cost”
regressions survived our selection criteria, due either to insufficient observations or an
insignificant regression F- statistic.
Tax saving through tax concessions: This variable had a uniformly positive impact on tax
compliance and surprisingly, also on taxes paid though the effect was small. The negative
impact on tax evasion as a percentage of tax paid, furthermore was uniformly significant while
the positive impact on taxes paid was uniformly insignificant. This suggests that revenue lost
due to tax concessions is offset or more than offset through the positive impact of concessions
on compliance. This result potentially contradicts predictions of theoretical models based on
Allingham and Sandmo. However, it is more plausible that the endogeneity of tax savings,
arising since tax savings decisions and the decision to incur added voluntary compliance cost
are made jointly, which could not be corrected for, is the cause of biased results.
71
Tax deducted at source: TDS has a uniformly significant and positive effect on taxes paid and
also a uniformly positive (but insignificant effect) on tax compliance for two of the three tax
compliance variables. The latter impact (though not the insignificance) accords with the
finding of Crane and Nourzad (1994) for US taxpayers. This suggests that third party
compliance costs of those charged
72
with
48
This interpretation, due to Professor Michael Godwin, is gratefully acknowledged.
73
TDS have revenue benefits.49 In fact, benefits are significant even relative to TDS costs
reported in Chattopadhyay and Das-Gupta (2002). However, the finding must be taken to be
inconclusive, since the TDS effect for the third tax evasion variable was uniformly positive,
though uniformly insignificant and numerically small.
Respondents’ opinion about the burden of the income tax: None of these regressions are reported.
This is due to insufficient observations.
Respondents impression about the Income Tax Department: Though this variable proved
insignificant in all regressions, a poor impression was associated with greater non-compliance
or tax evasion in 100 percent of viable regressions. The sign of the (insignificant) impact on
taxes paid is not uniform.
Salary/non-salary dummy variable: At the margin (controlling for compliance cost and TDS
differences), salary earners paid significantly lower taxes than non-salary earners.
Furthermore, though the impact is almost uniformly insignificant, results suggest that the
difference between compliance by salary earners and non-salary earners, if any, is negative,
supporting the theoretical prediction of Yaniv (1988).50 That is, at the margin, salary earners
are more evasion prone than non-salary earners! This does not, however, imply greater overall
evasion by salary earners, given that they are subject to extensive tax deduction at source.
Further study is warranted before this finding is used to infer lessons for policy.
Self-assessed income tax knowledge: None of these regressions are reported. This is due to
insufficient observations.
Socio demographic variables. For these variables, the only significant finding is that females
pay less taxes than males. However, tax evasion by females is also lower than that by males,
though not significantly so.
The magnitude of compliance cost effects on compliance: Estimates
To estimate the impact of compliance costs on tax evasion, the method used is to compare
estimated tax or evasion when the coefficient of a variable of interest is zero to that at the
mean value of the variable when the coefficient is as estimated. Coefficient values are
assumed to be the average coefficients given in the Annex using the estimate of evasion as a
percentage of estimated gross income (Table A4). That is, for the fitted value of any
dependent variable, y, and independent variable xj, except dummy variables, using bars to
denote means,
log (y+100) j + log(xj+100), where
j j log(y 100) j log(x j
100)
To convert estimated evasion, as a percentage of income into rupee estimates of aggregate tax
evasion,
y is multiplied by YA, the estimated aggregate income of taxpayers in 2000-01 as estimated
by Chattopadhyay and Das-Gupta (2002). This is done separately for salaried and non-salaried
74
and then summed to get the aggregate estimate.
49
Professor Richard Bird has pointed out that TDS in some other countries is subject to a
variety of non- compliance activities. For example, some firms using withheld taxes for
internal finance when likely to go bankrupt. On bankruptcy, they then leave tax debts.
These debts are usually legally owed by taxpayers forcing them to pay taxes twice over. No
attempt was made to study these problems in the Indian context, though partial information
is available in the annual reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General. On the part of
companies responsible for TDS, they have expressed the view, in focus group meetings,
that TDS penalty provisions are draconian and invoked indiscriminately by Income Tax
officials.
50
About evasion from the part of income not subject to TDS of individuals who are largely
subject to TDS.
75
A “confidence interval” for these estimates is derived by using “standard errors” derived from
the average t-ratios and average estimated coefficients in the Annex, assuming N = 30
observations, to get upper and lower values of j. The t-value used in the confidence interval is
1.7. Estimates are reported in Table 5.7.
Table 5.7: Estimates of Tax Evasion Effects of Compliance Costs and Tax Saving
In Crores of Rupees As a % of
tax
Mid Low High Mid Low High
SALARY
Legal Compliance cost -395 -2033 1244 -2.55 -13.15 8.04
Bribe 13404 11549 15259 86.70 74.70 98.70
Total Compliance cost 13009 9514 16503 84.15 61.55 106.74
Tax Saving -4848 -5797 -3898 -31.35 -37.50 -25.21
Advisor 546 451 641 3.53 2.92 4.14
TDS -994 -1837 -152 -6.43 -11.88 -0.98
NON-SALARY
Legal Compliance cost -117 -1161 927 -0.72 -7.16 5.72
Bribe 9232 7955 10510 56.94 49.06 64.82
Total Compliance cost 9115 6793 11437 56.22 41.90 70.54
Tax Saving -2221 -2656 -1786 -13.70 -16.38 -11.02
Advisor 1245 1029 1461 7.68 6.35 9.01
TDS -480 -886 -73 -2.96 -5.47 -0.45
ALL
TAXPAYERS
Legal Compliance cost -512 -3194 2171 -1.62 -10.08 6.85
Bribe 22636 19503 25769 71.47 61.58 81.36
Total Compliance cost 22125 16309 27940 69.85 51.49 88.21
Tax Saving -7069 -8453 -5684 -22.32 -26.69 -17.95
Advisor 1791 1480 2102 5.65 4.67 6.64
TDS -1474 -2724 -225 -4.65 -8.60 -0.71
While the magnitude of the estimated impact of bribes on taxes evaded is much too high,
especially for salary earners, in relative terms bribes are estimated to have the greatest
impact on non-compliance. The impact of legal compliance costs is small and could be either
positive or negative. Other variables related to compliance costs have relatively small effects,
with the use of advisors leading to a 4 per cent to 7 per cent revenue loss through increased
evasion and TDS leading to a 0.7 per cent to 8.6 per cent revenue gain. The estimates for tax
saving, however, suggest that evasion decreases by between 18 per cent and 26.7 per cent of
tax revenue on account of evasion. Given the sample average tax saving of 26.6 percent 51, of
which a large fraction is in government bonds which are a capital receipt of the government,
the net impact of tax saving on the government budget may be positive. However, on
disaggregation, this result is found to be driven by salary earners, with there being a net
revenue loss from the non- salaried. The finding, furthermore should be viewed with caution
given the possibility of biased results due to the endogeneity of tax saving.
76
CONCLUSION
At the end of this study, we can say that given the rising standards of Indian individuals
and upward economy of the country, prudent tax planning before-hand is must for all the
citizens to make the most of their incomes. However, the mix of tax saving instruments,
planning horizon would depend on an individual’s total taxable income and age in the
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books:
• Income Tax Ready Reckoner – A.Y. 2007-08, TaxMann Publications, New Delhi
82