Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CH 1 - Civil Law Nominated Contract Full
CH 1 - Civil Law Nominated Contract Full
Contract
1. Principal
The principal is the total amount of the loan given. For example, if an individual takes out
a $250,000 mortgage to purchase a home, then the principal loan amount is $250,000.
Lenders typically like to see a 20% down payment on the purchase of a home. So, if the
$250,000 mortgage represents 80% of the home’s appraised value, then the homebuyers
would be making a down payment of $62,500, and the total purchase price of the home
would be $312,500.
2. Interest
The interest is the monthly percentage added to each mortgage payment. Lenders and banks
don’t simply loan individuals money without expecting to get something in return. Interest is
the money a lender or bank earns or charges on the money they loaned to homebuyers.
3. Taxes
In most cases, mortgage payments will include the property tax the individual must pay as a
homeowner. The municipal taxes are calculated based on the value of the home.
4. Insurance
Mortgages also include homeowner’s insurance, which is required by lenders to cover
damage to the home (which acts as collateral), as well as the property inside of it. It also
covers specific mortgage insurance, which is generally required if an individual makes a
down payment that is less than 20% of the home’s cost. That insurance is designed to
protect the lender or bank if the borrower defaults on his or her loan.
Chapter 3
Lease
Definition of Lease
• A lease is a contractual arrangement calling for the user (referred to as the lessee) to pay
the owner (the lessor) for use of an asset. Property, buildings and vehicles are common
assets that are leased.
• Industrial or business equipment is also leased.
• Broadly put, a lease agreement is a contract between two parties: the lessor and the lessee.
The lessor is the legal owner of the asset, while the lessee obtains the right to use the
asset in return for regular rental payments.
• The lessee also agrees to abide by various conditions regarding their use of the property
or equipment. For example, a person leasing a car may agree to the condition that the car
will only be used for personal use.
A lease of immoveable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, made for a
certain time, express or implied, or in perpetuity, in consideration of a price paid or
promised, or of money, a share of crops, service or any other thing of value, to be rendered
periodically or on specified occasions to the transferor by the transferee, who accepts the
transfer on such terms.
"Lessor", "lessee", "premium" and "rent" defined
The transferor is called the lessor, the transferee is called the lessee, the price is called the
premium, and the money, share, service or other thing to be so rendered is called the rent.
All kinds of personal property (e.g. cars and furniture) or real property (e.g. raw land,
apartments, single family homes, and business property, which includes wholesale and retail)
may be leased. As a result of the lease, the owner (lessor) grants the use of the stated property
to the lessee.
Common elements of a lease agreement
landlord
A landlord is the owner of a house, apartment, condominium, land, or real estate which is
rented or leased to an individual or business, who is called a tenant (also a lessee or
renter).
Types of tenancies
1. Fixed-term tenancy or tenancy for years
A fixed-term tenancy or tenancy for years lasts for some fixed period of time. It has a definite
beginning date and a definite ending date. Despite the name "tenancy for years", such a
tenancy can last for any period of time—even a tenancy for one week may be called a
tenancy for years.
A fixed term tenancy comes to an end automatically when the fixed term runs out or, in the
case of a tenancy that ends on the happening of an event, when the event occurs.
2. Tenancy at will
A tenancy at will is a tenancy which either the landlord or the tenant may terminate at any
time by giving reasonable notice. Unlike a periodic tenancy, it isn't associated with a time
period. It may last for many years, but it could be ended at any time by either the lessor or
the lessee for any reason, or for no reason at all. Proper notice, as always with
landlord/tenant law, must be given, as set forth in the state's statutes.
A tenancy at will is broken, again by operation of law, if the: Tenant commits waste against
the property; Tenant attempts to assign the tenancy; Tenant uses the property to operate a
criminal enterprise; Landlord transfers his/her interest in the property; Landlord leases the
property to another person; Tenant or landlord dies.
Leases of land
A land lease permits a tenant to use a piece of property in exchange for the payment of rent.
Land leases are commonly used for mobile homes, billboards and farmland.
A land lease, also called a ground lease, is a lease agreement that permits the tenant to use a
piece of land owned by the landlord in exchange for rent. Land leases work very similarly to
the way traditional property leases operate, and tenants can enter into both residential and
commercial agreements.
Types of Land Lease
1. Residential Land Leases
Residential leases are uncommon but not unheard of for permanent real property, especially
when a homeowner owns the house on the land in question. Instead, residential land leases are
used almost exclusively for mobile or trailer homes. When a consumer purchases a mobile
home, the buyer must find her own land to park on at her own cost. Mobile home
communities, colloquially referred to as trailer parks, offer mobile home buyers open land on
which they can move their home under a residential land lease agreement. Mobile home land
leases generally include hook-ups to water, electricity and sewage as well.
2.Commercial Land Lease
Commercial land leases are more common than residential and are available for various types
of commercial ventures. Land leases for parking spaces, such as an open field or parking lot,
are common in cities where parking is not always readily available. Short-term commercials
leases for temporary or pop-up retail shops are also popular in land leasing arrangements.
3. Agricultural Farmland Leases
A farmland lease is an arrangement where a farmer who does not own enough suitable land
to raise crops leases farmable land from someone else. Farmland leases are the most
common types of land leases in areas where farmable land is a hot commodity.
Landlords that own large plots of farmable land often lease their plots to tenants when they
have no interest in farming the land themselves. Farmland leases may allow tenants to raise
livestock or keep animals such as horses in areas where sufficient space is not readily
available or affordable.
4. Governmental Land Leases
Government owns a significant amount of property throughout the country and surrounding
territories, and each state also retains ownership over some plots of land. This land can then
be rented to the military, the state or to individual counties for public uses.
For example, if a state-owned a large plot of undeveloped land, the state could lease the land
to the county where the plot is located and allow the county to develop a community park.
Governmental land leases allow the government to retain control and interest in the land
while simultaneously permitting the general public to enjoy its use.
5. Ground Lease
A land lease or ground lease is a long-term lease of land, typically 50 to 99 years in length.
The tenant normally makes improvements to the property, such as building a restaurant,
supermarket or other structures. The terms of the lease dictate what happens to the
improvements at the end of the lease term, which might give the landowner rights to the
buildings, allow the tenant to remove the improvements or give the landowner the option
to purchase the improvements.
• Considerations
• In a ground lease, the tenant is typically required to pay expenses on the property, such as
taxes, insurance, maintenance and repairs, during the term of the lease, referred to as a net
lease. The actual conditions of the lease can vary, depending on the agreement between the
property owner and lessee.
• Benefits
• A property owner has the benefit of retaining ownership of the land while earning revenue
on the property, without the expense of developing the land. Since it is typically a long-term
lease, the property owner has a tenant locked into a commitment for a long period. At the
end of the lease, the property owner may reap the benefits of whatever improvements the
tenant made to the land.
• Function
• Ground leases are often commercial leases, giving lessees a way to build a business
without the expense of purchasing land. Governments sometimes enter into ground leases
when constructing public buildings. This allows them to construct buildings, such as
libraries, when public land is not available and purchasing real estate is unaffordable
Leasing vs. renting
The main difference between a lease and rent agreement is the period of time they cover.
A rental agreement tends to cover a short term—usually 30 days—while a lease contract
is applied to long periods—usually 12 months, although 6 and 18-month contracts are
also common.
Similarities between leasing and renting
Lease and rental agreements have the following things in common:
•They are specific to a period of time.
•They include a security deposit, which the renter pays the landlord to cover damages, but
which the landlord returns at the end of the term.
•They specify what utility costs and maintenance the owner is responsible for and what
maintenance the renter is responsible for.
•They give rules for usage, including allowances for pets and a landlord’s right to entry.
Advantages of leasing
•Greater stability. Stability is the key advantage of a lease. You’re entitled to stay in your
home through the duration of the contract. It’s an ideal arrangement for someone who
knows they want to stay in a place long-term.
•No rent increases. The landlord can’t raise the rent for the duration of the contract. Once
you’ve signed a lease, you’re locked into the monthly rent set forth in that document.
•Rent-controlled renewal. In rent-controlled areas, you may be entitled to renew your lease
at the same rate (or with a slight percentage increase) at the end of a lease term, making
expensive cities more affordable for some.
Disadvantages of leasing
•Less flexible. You have less flexibility when signing a lease. You’ve agreed to stay in a place
for the amount of time set forth in that contract. That means if the price of rents suddenly
decreases in your area, you may find yourself paying higher rent than you would be if you
had moved recently.
•Harder to move suddenly. The same goes for sudden life changes. If you get a job in
another part of the country or need to move back home to help out during a family
emergency, a long-term lease can turn into an obstacle. Some landlords
allow subletting which can help make leasing more flexible.
•Consequences to breaking a lease. There are consequences for breaking a lease. that
include the loss of deposit, or even being on the hook for the remaining rent. Check the terms
of the lease to find out what the consequences are for early termination.
Advantages of renting
•Short-term flexibility. A monthly rental agreement can be ideal if you know you’re only
going to be in town for a set amount of time—for an internship, for instance—or if you’ve
just arrived in town and want a place to land while you look around for other housing
options.
•Easier to make life changes. Unlike a lease agreement, it accommodates big, unexpected
life changes that may require you to leave the area.
•Opportunities to renegotiate. Many rentals convert to a month-to-month contract at the end
of the first 30 days, and while you aren’t going to be signing a new rental agreement every
month, it does give you a chance to renegotiate some terms of the contract if you want, such
as asking for the landlord to allow you to have a pet.
Disadvantages of renting
What you gain flexibility you lose in stability, so figure out what your priorities are before you
decide to lease or rent.
•Less stability. Both you and the landlord have the right to walk away from a rental contract at
the end of the 30 days. That can be freeing unless you want to stay—which may not be up to
you. In your tenant screening, make sure to go over your contract and take note of if the
landlord has to notify you within a certain time period that you have to leave the home at the
end of your contract.
•Rent increases. In many places, the landlord can raise the rent every time the contract renews.
That means if property values go up in your neighborhood, your landlord may well want to see
that reflected in your rent. A sudden rent increase can mean the difference between staying and
going. The specifics of when and how much your landlord can raise the rent should be in your
Chapter 4
Agency
Agency:
Agency is the relationship which exists where one person (the principal) authorizes another
(the agent) to act on its behalf and the agent agrees to do so. Although agency can be
relevant in various areas of the law, this chapter is solely concerned with the agent acting on
behalf of its principal in making contracts with others.
➢ Normally the authority given by a principal to its agent is an express authority enabling the
latter to bind the former by acts done within the scope of that authority. Such authority may,
in general, be given orally. But in some cases, it is necessary that the authority should be
given in a special form.
➢ First, in order that an agent may make a binding contract by deed, it is necessary that
authority should normally be given in a deed.
➢ The authority of an agent may also be implied. But such implied authority can be negatived
by an express limitation. In most cases implied authority is said to be incidental to an express
authority or required due to the circumstances of the case.
(2) By the principal’s ratification of a contract
➢ Even if the agent enters into a contract without the authority of the principal, the principal
may subsequently ratify, that is to say, adopt the benefit and liabilities of a contract made
on the principal’s behalf. This may occur in one of two ways.
(i) To account
The agent is bound to account for such property of the principal as comes into its hands in
the course of the employment. The agent must keep accurate accounts of the transactions
which are entered into on the principal’s behalf, and produce them on demand to the
principal.
(ii) To use care and skill
The agent must also use ordinary diligence in the discharge of its duties, displaying any
special skill or capacity which it may profess in relation to the work in hand. Where the
agency is gratuitous, the agent is only liable in tort; the standard of care is that which might
reasonably be expected in the circumstances. If the agent fails in its duty, the normal
remedy of the principal is to bring an action for damages or equitable compensation; but
where the breach consists of a failure to pay across money received on behalf of the
principal, an action for money had and received or an action for an account may also be
brought by the principal.
(iii) Not to make secret profit
The fiduciary’s obligation of loyalty entails that the agent must not, except with the
knowledge and assent of the principal, make any profit out of its position as agent. It is
immaterial that the principal has suffered no loss, or that the agent has acted throughout in
good faith. Any such profit is held on constructive trust and must be accounted for (ie paid
over) to the principal.
(iv) Not to put itself in a position where interest and duty conflict
More generally, the fiduciary’s duty of loyalty means that the agent must not put itself in a
position where its duty and interest conflict unless full disclosure of the agent’s interest
(specifying its exact nature) has been made to the principal, and the principal has given its
informed consent to the conflict.
(i) Insolvency:
The insolvency of either the principal or the agent will determine an agency for
most purposes. But the appointment of a receiver or the cessation of business
by the agent will not.
(ii) Frustration:
It refers to any act or abstinence performed by the promisee or any other person at the request
of the promisor. Law permits consideration to be moved by persons who are not parties to the
contract as long as it is at the request of the promisor.
What Is Privity?
The doctrine of privity of contract is one of the major principles that govern the law of
contracts. The word ‘privity’ means ‘with knowledge and consent’. According to this
doctrine, only parties to a contract have the right to enforce the rights and obligations
provided by the contract and strangers to the contract are barred from enforcing any
obligation on any party. This doctrine protects parties to a contract from obligations that
they never agreed to incur. Only those parties that have an interest in the contract can sue
for its enforcement.
Privity is a doctrine of contract law that says contracts are only binding on the parties to a
contract and that no third party can enforce the contract or be sued under it. Lack of privity
exists when parties have no contractual obligation to one another, thereby eliminating
obligations, liabilities, and access to certain rights.
❑ The Doctrine of Privity states that only those who are parties to a contract can have rights
or liabilities under it
❑ A major exception to the doctrine it allows the parties to a contract to create benefits that
are legally enforceable by a third party
For example, A and B entered into a contract where A gave Rs.100 in return for which B
agreed to deliver a watch to C. Here since C is a stranger to the contract he cannot sue B if he
fails to deliver the watch.
Though consideration can be provided by third parties, they can never enforce the
performance of the contract as they are strangers to the contract. It is important to note that
there is a difference between a stranger to contract and stranger to consideration. As a stranger
to consideration remains a party to the contract in spite of not providing consideration, he can
still file a suit challenging the contract.
Understanding Privity
Privity is an important concept in contract law. Under the doctrine of privity, for example, the
tenant of a homeowner cannot sue the former owner of the property for failure to make
repairs guaranteed by the land sales contract between seller and buyer as the tenant was not
"in privity" with the seller. Privity is intended to protect third parties to a contract from
lawsuits arising from that contract.
However, privity has proven to be problematic; as a result, numerous exceptions are now
accepted.
▪ In contract law, privity is a doctrine that imposes rights and obligations to parties of a
contract and restricts non-contractual parties from enforcing the contract.
▪ Lack of privity states that there is no contract between parties, thereby not requiring them to
perform certain duties and not entitling them to certain rights.
▪ Under the doctrine of privity, for example, the tenant of a homeowner cannot sue the former
owner of the property for failure to make repairs guaranteed by the land sales contract
between seller and buyer as the tenant was not "in privity" with the seller.
▪ Privity is intended to protect third parties to a contract from lawsuits arising from that
contract.
▪ The strict liability and implied warranty doctrines allow third parties to sue manufacturers
for faulty goods, even though they are not parties to the original contract.
Exceptions to the rule that a Third Party to contract cannot sue
The doctrine of privity of contract is however not absolute. There are several exceptional
situations in which a third party to a contract can sue. The following are the exceptions to the
doctrine of privity.
For example, in the case of Lakshmi Ammal v. Sundararaja Iyengar (1914), there was an
agreement among the brothers of a Hindu joint family to pay for the expenses to be incurred
for the marriage of their sister. Despite being a third party to the agreement, the sister had the
right to enforce the provision that was made for her.
3. Acknowledgement or Estoppel
According to the law of estoppel, if a person by words or conduct suggests something, he is
not allowed to contradict it later. Thus, if a party to a contract acknowledges by words or
conduct that a third party has the right to sue him, he cannot deny that later by the rule of
estoppel. In such cases, a suit filed by that party, despite being a stranger to the contract, is
maintainable.
For example, A and B enter into a contract where A pays B a sum of money that has to be
given to C. B acknowledges to C that he is holding the sum for him. If B defaults in the
payment, C will have the right to recover the sum from him.
3. Contracts entered into through an agent
It is not uncommon for people involved in commerce and business to enter into contracts
through their agents. These agents can enter into contracts for them and represent them in the
relations that arise in such contracts. Thus, whatever contracts entered into by an agent while
acting within the scope of his authority can be enforced by the principal. It may seem that the
agent is the party to the contract, but in reality, he is more of a representative of the principal.
For example, A appoints B as his agent. He asks B to buy a bag of rice from C on his behalf.
Here, B enters into a contract with C when he buys the bag of rice, but it is A who has the right
to enforce the contract as B is a mere representative of A.
4. Charge created on a specific immovable property
In certain cases, charges or covenants are made on a specific immovable property, like land
for the benefit of a third party. In such cases, these third parties can enforce the contract,
though they are strangers to the contract.
5. Assignment of a contract
Assignment of contract refers to the transfer or assignment of the rights and liabilities arising
from contractual relations to a third party. In cases where the benefits of a contract are being
assigned, the assignee of the benefits can sue upon the contract though he is not a party to the
contract.
For example, a husband assigns his insurance policy in favour of his wife. As the benefit of
the contract is assigned to her, she has the right to enforce the contract though she is not a
party to it.
6. Collateral contracts
Collateral contracts refer to the contracts subsidiary to the original contract. It could be
entered into by the same parties or one of the original parties with another party. It can be
made before or after the main contract is formed. When a third party has entered into a
collateral contract, he can also file a suit to enforce the main contract in spite of not being a
party to it.
The best example of a collateral contract is a manufacturer’s guarantee regarding the goods
sold. The sale of the goods is the main contract and the guarantee is the contract collateral
to it.
Chapter 7
Financial
Contract
Related Crime
Crime
the intentional commission of an act usually deemed socially harmful or
dangerous and specifically defined, prohibited, and punishable under criminal
law.
Financial Crime
Financial crime is defined as crime that is specifically committed against property. These
crimes are almost always committed for the personal benefit of the criminal, and they
involve an illegal conversion of ownership of the property that is involved.
Who commits Financial Crime ?
There are essentially seven groups of people who commit the various types of
financial crime:
❑ Organized criminals, including terrorist groups, are increasingly perpetrating
large-scale frauds to fund their operations.
❑ Corrupt heads of state may use their position and powers to loot the coffers
of their (often impoverished) countries.
❑ Business leaders or senior executives manipulate or misreport financial data
in order to misrepresent a company’s true financial position.
❑Employees from the most senior to the most junior steal company funds
and other assets.
❑From outside the company, fraud can be perpetrated by a customer,
supplier, contractor or by a person with no connection to the organization.
❑Increasingly, the external fraudster is colluding with an employee to
achieve bigger and better results more easily.
❑Finally, the successful individual criminal, serial or opportunist fraudsters in
possession of their proceeds are a further group of people who have
committed financial crime.
What are the main types of Financial Crime ?
Financial crime is commonly considered as covering the following
offences:
❑ fraud
❑ electronic crime
❑ money laundering
❑ terrorist financing
❑ bribery and corruption
❑ market abuse and insider dealing
❑ information security
What is Money Laundering?
Money laundering is the illegal process of making large amounts of
money generated by a criminal activity, such as drug trafficking or
terrorist funding, appear to have come from a legitimate source. The
money from the criminal activity is considered dirty, and the process
"launders" it to make it look clean.
➢ Refuse to pay
In case the account of the payer doesn’t have sufficient funds in order for
the bank to pay the amount mentioned on the cheque to the payee, then
the cheque will be dishonored.
• Material Alterations :
If the drawer’s signature on the cheque is different than that of the specimen signature
available with the bank, then the cheque will not be accepted and treated as dishonored
cheque.
If the date mentioned on the cheque is yet to come then, it is known as a post-dated
cheque, and these are to be presented in the bank at a later date. For instance., If a
cheque written on 30th July 2019 bears the date 16th August 2019, is a post-dated
cheque and if this is presented to the bank before the mentioned date then this cheque
will be dishonored
• Stale Cheque :
If any cheque is presented to the bank for payment after three months from
the date mentioned on it, then it is known as a stale cheque. After expiry of
that period, the cheque will be dishonored.
If the drawer has asked the bank to stop payment and not to pay for the
cheque which is already issued, then in such cases the bank will dishonor
the cheque.
• Frozen Account :
• Account Closed :
Ownership
Meaning & Definition
▪ Ownership refers to the relation that a person has with an object that he owns. It is an
aggregate of all the rights that he has with regards to the said object.
▪ These rights are in rem, that is, they can be enforced against the whole world and not just
any specific person.
▪ The concept of ownership flows from that of possession. In the primitive societies, there was
no idea of ownership. The only concept that they identified with was that of possession. It
was only after they started settling down by building homes and cultivating land that they
developed the idea of ownership.
▪ According to Austin, ownership refers to “a right indefinite in point of user, unrestricted in
point of disposition and unlimited in point of duration.”
▪ Concurring with Austin’s view, Holland defines ownership as the right of absolute control
over an object. According to him, ownership is an aggregate of all rights pertaining to the
possession, enjoyment and disposition of an object.
▪ According to Salmond, “ownership, in its most comprehensive signification, denotes the
relation between a person and right that is vested in him.
Essentials of Ownership
Upon analyzing the various definitions of ownership, the following essentials of ownership
can be derived:
▪ Indefinite point of user- The owner of a property has the liberty to use it. Others have the
duty to not to use it or to not to interfere with the owner’s right to use it.
▪ Unrestricted point of disposition- The owner has the right to dispose of the property at his
own will. A person needs to have the ownership of a thing in order to transfer that
ownership to someone else. Mere possession does not give the power to dispose of the
ownership.
▪ Right to possess- The owner has the right to possess the thing which he owns.
▪ Right to exhaust- If the nature of the thing which is owned is such that it can be exhausted
then the owner has the right to exhaust it at his own will.
▪ Residuary character- The owner may part with several rights with regards to the thing he
owns. This does not take away the ownership from him.
▪ Right to destroy or alienate- An owner has the right to destroy or alienate the thing that he
owns.
Subject Matter of Ownership
One of the subject matters of ownership is material objects. Salmond is of the view that the
real subject matter of ownership is rights. This particular view of Salmond is supported by the
common law system. However, it has also received some amount of criticism. It has been
argued that law generally recognizes ownership of land and chattels and not of any right. A
person is said to have certain rights and not own rights.
The subject-matter of ownership is essentially determined by the legal system of a state.
There are certain objects which, by their very nature, are incapable of being owned such as
jungles, air, water, etc. However, the legal system of a country may recognize the ownership of
such objects thereby making them a subject matter of ownership
Kinds of Ownership
Ownership may be of the following kinds:
1. Corporeal and Incorporeal Ownership Corporeal ownership refers to the ownership of
material objects whereas incorporeal ownership refers to the ownership of a right. Incorporeal
ownership can also be said to be the ownership of intangible things. Examples of corporeal
ownership include ownership of a house, table, car, etc. whereas those of incorporeal
ownership includes ownership of trademarks, copyright, patents, etc.
2. Trust and Beneficial Ownership
The subject-matter of such ownership consists of property owned by two persons wherein one
person is obligated to use it to the benefit of the other. The person under such an obligation is
called the trustee and his ownership is known as trust ownership. The person to whose benefit
the property is to be used is called the beneficiary and his ownership is known as beneficial
ownership. Trust ownership is only a matter of form and not a matter of substance. This
means that a trustee’s ownership of the property is only nominal in nature. He is given
someone else’s property fictitiously by law and thereby obligating him to use it to the real
owner’s benefit.
3. Legal and Equitable Ownership
Legal ownership refers to the ownership as recognized by the rules of a legal system whereas
equitable ownership refers to the ownership as recognized by the rules of equity. There may
be cases wherein law does not recognize the ownership due to some effect but equity does. In
such situations, the ownership is said to be equitable ownership. Legal ownership is a right in
rem whereas equitable ownership is a right in personam since equity acts are in personam. A
person may be the legal owner of a thing and another may be the equitable owner of the same
thing at the same time.
4. Vested and Contingent Ownership
All kinds of ownership may either be vested or contingent. Ownership is vested ownership
when the title of the person is perfect. On the other hand, ownership can be said to be
contingent if it is imperfect and can be perfected subject to the fulfilment of certain conditions.
Thus, contingent ownership is conditional in nature.
5. Sole Ownership and Co-ownership
Under ordinary circumstances, a right can be owned by only one person at a time. Such
ownership is known as sole ownership. However, in certain cases, same right may be vested in
two individuals at the same time. This is known as co-ownership. For instance, partners of a
firm are co-owners of the partnership property.
6. Common ownership and Joint Ownership
Co-ownership is of two kinds. It may be owned in common or joint ownership. In case of
common ownership the owners’ share in the property can be inherited by their respective heirs
whereas in case of joint ownership, in case of death of any one of the owners, his or her share
is transferred to the other owner. This is the fundamental point of difference between the two.
7. Absolute and Limited Ownership
Absolute ownership is one wherein the owner is vested with all the rights with regards to the
property which he owns. Such rights are exclusively vested in the owner. It must be noted here
that absolute use of the property implies general use since the property can only be used by
lawful means and for lawful purposes. When there are limitations imposed upon the owner’s
rights with regards to his property, the ownership is known as limited ownership.
Grounds for termination of ownership rights
✓ the right of ownership shall terminate when the owner alienates his property to other
persons, the owner renounces the right of ownership, the death or destruction of
property
✓ Compulsory seizure of property from the owner is not allowed, except in cases when, on
the grounds provided for by law
✓ alienation of immovable property in connection with the seizure of a land plot due to its
improper use
✓ termination of the lease agreement for a land plot
✓ requisition
Chapter 9 Possession
Possession
Jurists have defined possession based on their personal beliefs. It is the most fundamental
interaction between man and things, according to Salmond. However, Henry Maine defined it
as “interaction with an object that includes the exclusion of other people from enjoying it.” A
man is considered to own a thing over which he has seeming control or over which he has
apparent authority to exclude others, according to Federick Pollock.
Elements of possession
Legal possession, according to Holland, comprises two fundamental elements:
1.Corpus
2.Animus
Corpus Possession
Corpus denotes two things:
1. the possessor’s physical relationship to the res or object; and
2. the possessor’s relationship to the rest of the world.
The first point highlights that a person must have some physical touch with whatever he owns
to have a reasonable expectation that others will not interfere with it, i.e. that others will not
interfere with the possessor’s right to use or enjoy that object. This guarantee of non-
interference can be obtained in a variety of ways:
The physical power of the possessor
The possessor’s physical power over the object in his possession works as an assurance that the
thing will be used. It’s also a guarantee that others won’t interfere with his rights. To prevent
others from interfering with his lawful ownership, the person in possession typically utilizes
walls, gates, doors, and locks.
Personal presence of the possessor
In many cases, the possessor’s sheer physical presence is enough to keep ownership, even if
he lacks the physical power to fight intervention. For example, a penny in a child’s hand
suffices to indicate his ownership of the currency, although that he lacks the physical
capability to do so.
Secrecy
It is an efficient method of avoiding external influence and keeping an object in one’s
possession secure if a person maintains it in a hidden area.
Wrongful ownership is rarely seen favourably in modern cultures, thus respect for a
legitimate claim prevents others from interfering with the possessor’s lawful possession.
Animus Possidendi
Possession does not imply mere juxtaposition. It must imply the possibility of bodily control,
as well as a desire to exert such power. Animism is the mental component of possession.
The Classical Roman jurists acknowledged two levels of authority over a possessed thing, the
lesser of which were referred to as detention and the highest as possession, properly so-
called.
In the context of the factor of animus in legal possession, the following points should be
taken into account:
✓ R v. Hudson (1943) The urge to acquire does not have to be righteous, and it might even
be deliberately wicked. The ownership of stolen goods by a criminal is no less genuine
than the possession of stolen goods by the rightful owner.
✓ The possessor must have sole ownership of the object in his possession. That is, he must
intend to keep others from using and enjoying the item. However, the exclusion does not
have to be complete.
✓ The animus does not have to be accompanied by a claim or an intention to utilize the
items as owner. In the event of a promise, the pledgee has ownership of the pledged
items, even if he simply wants to keep them in custody as a security to guarantee that his
obligation is paid.
✓ The possessor’s animus does not have to be his or her own. A servant, agent, trustee, or
bailee, for example, does not maintain goods in his possession for his personal use, but
rather for the benefit of another person.
✓ The animus could not be particular; instead, it could be broad. For example, a guy who
has caught fish in his net has ownership of all of them, even though he has no idea how
many there are. Similarly, a person is assumed to own all of the books in his library, even if
he is unaware of the existence of any of them.
✓ The animus may not be specific instead it may be merely general. For instance, a person
who has caught fish in his net has possession of all of them although he does not know
their exact numbers. Likewise, a person is deemed to have owned all the books in his
library although he may not even know about the existence of some of them.