Final Report

An Integrated AHP-GIS integrated Analysis Model for

Branch’s site selection in yeka sub city
For Amhara Bank S.C

Prepared by :-Mefitihe General Commission Service

Dec, 2021 GC
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

1
Abbreviation

AHP -------------------------Analytical Hierarchical Process

GIS----------------------------Geographical information system

Alt. ----------------------------Alternative

TOC----------------------------Technical Objective Criteria

FOC----------------------------Financial Objective Criteria

SSC-----------------------------Strategic Subjective Criteria

FSC-----------------------------Building Feature Subjective Criteria

2
Contents
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1
Background of the Report ............................................................................................................... 1
Assumptions of the report .............................................................................................................. 5
Objective of the report .................................................................................................................... 5
Scope of the report ......................................................................................................................... 5
Limitation of the report ................................................................................................................... 5
PART ONE:- Methodology employed .............................................................................................. 6
Rationale of the report .................................................................................................................... 7
Service quality ............................................................................................................................. 7
Accessibility And Customer Acquisition ...................................................................................... 8
Infrastructure .............................................................................................................................. 8
Bank Profitability ......................................................................................................................... 8
Marketing and Branding .............................................................................................................. 8
Competitions ............................................................................................................................... 8
GIS criteria and their weight............................................................................................................ 9
Proposed site/branch GIS output Mapping/Pinning ....................................................................... 9
PART TWO :- AHP pair wise matrix comparison Analysis .............................................................. 11
1st Priority site(around Megenagna Square short listed building information) ........................... 14
2nd Priority site(around 02 local market short listed building information) ................................ 21
3rdPriority site(around kotebe Bus station short listed building information) ............................. 27
4rdPriority site(near Ayat round about ) ....................................................................................... 31
5thPriority site(Kotebe Wosen Grocery area )............................................................................... 38
Proposed Ranked Sites/Branches In Yeka Sub City summery ........... Error! Bookmark not defined.
GIS Map ......................................................................................................................................... 42
Measure recommendations of the report .................................................................................... 43

3
Introduction
Meftihe general commissioning service is providing an integrated site selection analysis
for bank branch sites by its own developed integrated Geographical information system,
AHP, MCLP Matrix analysis model. Our company were enlightened to work with
Amhara Bank SC due to the emergency of the bank with huge financial mobilization and
its public trust and expectation we found that it will be a potential costumer for our
company in the finance sector. There for we prepare and present a concept note for the
establishing and organizing committee members as a result we get encouraging feedback
and reached remarked and consciousness were reach to developed for project proposal.

Our company prepared the detailed project proposal and presented to the Amhara bank
board for the clear understanding and clarification about our model. The board provide
encouraging feedback and comments incorporating the feedback and comments were
develop a pilot project in Yeka Sub City for its practical implementation and presented
for the CEO and management committee members generally four times presentation and
site supervision were performed. Finally, after the actual site supervision and analysis
with the CEO and members of the management the detail financial and legal framework
agreement proposal were submitted for final negotiation. On behalf of the bank Ato
Eliase ordered as referencing the management decision of the bank that the pilot project
was accepted and as initial phase twenty branches were planned in Yeka sub city as a
result we are expected to identify and prepare the completed report as per the order and
sign the contract agreement at a sub city base for the first phase of our analysis report.

Background of the Report

The general information about the compotator bank number of branches and its
distributions and growth trend is important mile stone for the new bank intervention to
the market. According to NBE there are 18 commercial banks in Ethiopia since end 2020
and there are 4 banks on progress to join the banking sector.

There are 2,208 branches in throughout the country according to NBE report in June
2014 E.c From these 60% of their branches are in Addis Ababa. The major banks capital
and growth rate trends are as follows in the table below.

1
selected Competitors Private Bank Branch Opening (source from each banks annual reports )

Available CBE Awash Bank S.c Dashen Bank S.c Berhan Wegagen
branches in Bank S.c Bank S.c
Year G.c
2012 695 86 64 76 22
2015 998 150 133 161 72
2018 1284 400 373 273 200
2020 1666 535 400 383 222

2500
CBE
2000
Awash
Dashen 1500
Berhan
Wegagen 1000
Linear (CBE ) 500
Linear (Awash )
0
2012 2015 2018 2020

To have comparative advantage in the site selection and take a market share in the market
we take five banks as best competent for Amhara Bank. The competitors are selected by
their paid-up capital, number of employees, number of shareholders, growth rate trends
and number of branches and its distributions through the country and particular in Addis
Ababa. We tried to analysis the branch growth rate of these compotator banks and
forecast the probability of achievements for the coming five years. The aim of these
analysis is estimated the number of branches required to open within the coming five
years that Amhara bank to come up with best competent bank and targeting to be the
leading bank in the coming ten years in service delivery, coverage, and customer
acquisitions and customer satisfaction through accessible location.

we are then prepare a site selection analysis in Yeka sub city with three priorities first
priority, second priority and third priority. Total compotator branches in Yeka sub city
are 152 by 17 commercial banks as indicated in the table below.

2
 Yeka Sub City Compotator Bank Branch Distributions by Site Location

Wegagen bank
Abisynia bank

Zemen bank
Berhan bank
Dashen bank
Debu Global

Bunna bank

Addis bank
Hibret bank

Abay bank
Cooperative

Enat bank
Oromia
Oromia
Anbesa
Awash

Total
CBE

Nib
No Area distributions
1 Megenagna Area 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15
2 Century Mall Area 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
3 Gurd Shola Area 1 1 1 1 1 1 6
4 Sahelitemihiret Area 1 1 1 1 1 5
5 Civil Service Area 1 1 1 1 4
6 CMC Michael Area 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 11
7 Yetebaberut Area 1 1 1 3
8 Meri Area 1 1 1 1 4
9 Hayat Aea 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 14
10 Tafo Area 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19
11 Tsebel street Area 1 1 1 3
12 Ayat to Semit Area 3 2 1 2 1 3 2 1 1 1 17
13 Wosen area 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 15
14 Hill side school area 1 1 1 1 4
15 Menahariaya Area 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13
16 Zero Hulet Area 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
17 Total 21 13 11 6 5 8 11 8 9 9 15 9 7 8 4 5 3 152
Source (actual data collection )…………………………………………………………………………………………………………

3
According to the integrated data analysis conducted by Meftihe General Commissioning
Service the total number of branches required in the coming five years in Yeka sub city
will be 31 having the first priority nine, the second priority will be nine and the third
priority will be thirteen within the coming five years. The data analysis and priority maps
are shown below by different criterion defined with the relative importance and pair wise
comparisons and criterion weight generated.

4
Assumptions of the report
The major assumptions considered in this report are the compotator trend analysis, the
distributions of the branches and the number of branches functional by each compotator
in the sub city, the growth rate and financial capacity and share holders distributions, the
subjective and objective criteria’s are accepted by the bank, twenty branches required for
this year is approved by the management of the bank and order given to accomplish, this
report is fundamentally required by the bank CEO and the management for final decision
and further plat form to proceed the work scientifically were significantly taken to
account. Other requirements will be included while the bank fulfill the required
information for the best analysis of the number of branch’s and its distributions.

Objective of the report

The main objective of this report is to clarify the working procedures and the scientific
tools and techniques employed in bank branch selection by our company. The practical
sites analyzed and identified in Yeka sub city as a pilot for implementation of the service
in the long run. To provide appropriate information about the accuracy of our work in
level of importance in the comparative advantages of using these integrated analysis
model in time cost and quality service provision in this sector. Finally, it clearly indicates
our commitment to contribute for the success of the bank by scientific intervention and
grow together strategically in continuous improvements in multidimensional
perspectives.

Scope of the report

The scope of the report mainly focuses on Yeka sub city in area coverage for one-year
respect to time parameter and site selection as only one basic significant factor for quality
service provision that should be conducted scientifically and transparent way to avoid
corruption, save time and cost for leasing the bank branch selection by respective
professionals by using scientific tools and techniques.

Limitation of the report

The report will be limited its level of accuracy and precision due to the following major
constraints factors. The first critical factors that will hinder the report is the analysis is
quite scientific from whole to part not from part to whole meaning it is designed in
deductive approaches than inductive analysis. It implies that Yeka sub city selecting

5
twenty branches ordered by the management devotes from our analysis methodology.
The second factor is that we don’t have the strategic plans of the bank service coverage
growth target within ten and five years and service delivery modalities as well as
costumer distributions in the capital and regional cities and competitor’s analysis
parameters different from our developed criteria’s. Finally, this report is highly affected
by time taking decisions that makes our primary identified priority sites are hired by other
competitors. In addition to these our analysis and data collection were slightly affected by
building owner’s due to duplications of data collection and legal assignment by the bank
to conduct this analysis officially. Timely communication and appropriate feedback to
improve or proceed with our tasks influences our performance to conduct our activities in
scheduled and preplanned approaches.

PART ONE:-Methodology employed

In this project objective we get criteria from literature review and applying AHP to obtain
criterion weight. In the next step, for GIS analysis, the GIS software Esri Arc GIS for
Desktop 10 and various GIS layers would be used. The GIS layers represent each of the
criteria to be used in the GIS analysis. To manage the analysis, it has to be made sure that
sufficient GIS data are available, otherwise develop the GIS layers. While map making
preparation, multiple geographic layers are aggregated to produce maps that show the
suitability of the land for making the new bank branch. Finally, Analytical Hierarchy
Process Pair wise matrix model integration with GIS would be applied to select the
branches that proposed site suggested by the GIS Analysis &prioritize Alternative
Building based on weight gain from the listed weighted criteria , population density,
higher potential customer acquisition, access to infrastructures, quality of buildings
relatively, available space for the bank grade, duration of contract, amount of down
payment, accessibility for parking, existing competent bank branches etc.

6
Figure1.The methodological process diagram

Analytical Define the objective

Hierarchy
Process for
GIS Identify and Weight the criteria

Preparing criterion maps

GIS Analysis Designing weights to criteria

Process

GIS analyses

Define the objective to pair wise comparisons

Analytical
Hierarchy Collect Data from Site
Process
Identify and Weight the criteria

Implementing pair wise AHP model

Check Validation (Consistency)

Rationale of the report

Service quality
site selection has a long lasting impact on every service provider to maintaining high level of
customer satisfaction specially now a day customers expectation can force the bank to work day
and night to meet the customers expectation. The selection of branch locating building/site
should identified with the predefined and standardized criteria which can contribute to deliver a
quality service to the internal & external customers. If internal customers are not delighted,
external customers can never be delighted therefore by create conducive working place like

7
spacing , air quality ,noise level and availability of natural light to the staff as well as customers,
in turn influence staff productivity external customers satisfaction.

Searching the desired site/branch mainly based on objected predefined and standardized
criteria’s that can able us to conduct pair wise matrix comparison among the available
site/branch for ranking with respect to branch conduciveness to deliver excellent service to the
customers .

Accessibility And Customer Acquisition

To gain new customers may impacted by proximity to the identified area that may exist
people/company who can be customers in the future. customers acquisition through selecting
accessible branch banking service can be help to achieve Amhara bank strategic objectives. By
using Demographic ,economic and market distribution as a predefined and standardized
criteria’s to conduct pair wise matrix comparisons to give hierarchical order /rank among
feasible sites . therefore this site/branch selection in yeka sub city proposed sites hierarchical
order and produced proposed building branch in the recommended sites by analyzing the
collected primary and secondary data .

Infrastructure
Potential sites for the location of a new bank branch facility were identified based on predefined
criteria’s . The absence of infrastructure and others main criteria’s were used as basic selection
criteria and alternatives sites were identified.
Bank Profitability
Site selection is one of the important decision making process for firms since, if done correctly ,
it provides access to the best customers and the greatest market potential. In contrast ,poor
location choices are costly and difficult to reverse. This report deals with multiple branch site
selection in the profitability context. Due to the high level of complexity taking in to account this
methodology would work well at the lowest possible cost.
Marketing and Branding
From the marketing point of view branch banking and expansion were highly forced by the
concerned Government regulatory body achieving economic growth by attracting the unbanked
society to the bank. On the other hand local banks must be design their own marketing and
branding strategy to achieve their objective. From this, using scientific branch selection
methodology the amhara bank S.c acquire high level of branding through the predefined
criteria’s that can help to maintain standardized branding

Competitions
Bank branches selection is a competitive facility location problem that a bank in competition
with other banks to increase itself market share in order to achieve maximum benefit attempt
to establish one or more its branches of the best places in the competitive market. On the other
hand , the search spaces of problem solutions also is widespread so using simple GIS analysis
functions as well as certain techniques and heuristic algorithm. The report indicate suitable bank
branches by optimizing the location of branches in yeka sub city classified 7 zone of priority the

8
required data have been collected from source and have been prepared with GIS software. To
analyzing the competitive market consider three private banks already in the working there and
we summarize hereunder

GIS criteria and their weight

Main criterion Weight of Sub-criterion Weight of sub-
criterion criterion
Demographic
attributes (C1) 0.124 Dense population of the area (SC1) 0.124
Cost of the location Cost of construction/purchase/rent of the site
(C2) 0.208 (ground) (SC2) 0.208
Competition (C3) 0.406 Proximity to branches of competitors (SC3) 0.406
Proximity to squares, junctions (SC4) 0.0141
Transportation (C4) 0.047 Proximity to the city center (SC5) 0.0329
Existence of ground for development (SC6) 0.0312
Flexibility (C5) 0.052 Facilities for development (SC8) 0.0208
Proximity to public parking (SC9) 0.039
Proximity to Business centers (SC10) 0.041
Proximity to hospitals (SC11) 0.021
Proximity to hotels and restaurants (SC12) 0.017
Proximity to local markets (SC13) 0.031
Access to public Proximity to public and private offices and
facilities (C6) 0.163 companies (SC14) 0.014
Total 1 1

Proposed site/branch GIS output Mapping/Pinning

9
10
11
PART TWO :- AHP pair wise matrix comparison Analysis
From the identified eight prioritized site in yeka sub city GIS output we conduct pair wise matrix
comparisons for each sites by collect data about alternatives obtained building proposed by GIS.
Therefore, as per the GIS suggestion the first priority branch must opened around megenagna
square. Then the pair wise matrix comparison conduct among the alternatives building which
are sort listed with respect to the predefined criteria’s for each prioritized sites in the territory
of Yeke sub city . in megenagn square site (1st prioritized) have been acquire four alternatives
branches from the all rounded criterion rational pair wise comparisons the proposed branch
sites have been ranked as follows

AHP criterion Weight given

Subjective criteria for branch evaluation during site supervision

No Major criteria’s Description CODEs weight

A strategic subjective criteria SSC

1 Relation with the bank strategic values and missions SSC1 0.05
2 Existence of potential business partners in the area SSC2 0.05
3 Concentration of business centers SSC3 0.03
4 Future development perspective of the area SSC4 0.01
Total weight A 0.13
B Building Features Subjective Criteria FSC
1 Quality of the building FSC1 0.024
3 Own and accessible parking FSC3 0.0084
4 Infrastructures facility, , , running toilet, FSC4 0.0048
5 Safety and security FSC5 0.0228
Total weight B 0.06
Total weight A+ B 0.19

12
No Major criteria’s Description CODEs Weight

A Objective Technical Criteria (OTC)

1 Area of the building for the bank OTC1 0.13
2 Average distance from main road OTC2 0.03
3 Floor OTC3 0.01
4 Location and access for ATM OTC4 0.05
5 Additional space visibility for billboard OTC5 0.06
Total weight A 0.28
B Objective Financial Criteria (OFC)
1 Price per square meter OFC1 0.38
2 Duration of the contract OFC2 0.07
3 Expectation of price adjustment OFC3 0.04
4 Amount of dawn payment requested OFC4 0.04
Total weight B 0.52
Total weight A+ B 0.8

13
1st Priority site(around Megenagna Square short listed building information)

No Name of the Building Codes Address :- Specific name Site/Br Contact person legal aspect of Tolerable Rank Other
Region/City/S of the area anch Name and the building:- Negotiation stated
ub area in Phone No renting period remarks
city/Woreda M2 & certificate and
/street name Floor others
or No
1 NO Name Alt.1 Next to lem Next to oil libia 160 m2 0902454950 Acceptable Negotiation 2nd
hotel
2 Amare Abreham and Megenagn Infront of 156 m2 0911316201 Acceptable Negotiation 1st
family Building Alt.2 Taxi station to derartu building
22
3 NO name Alt.3 Next to lem From lem hotel 148 m2 0911159258 Acceptable Negotiation 3rd
hotel to gurd shoal
4 Amare Abreham and Alt.4 Megenagn Infront of 0911316201 Acceptable Negotiation Rented
family Building Taxi station to derartu building
22

14
15
Pair Wise Compression Matrix Each Criteria With Respect To Alternative (Buildings)

AMARE
with respect to BISRAT AMARE Alt.4 (No AMARE priority with respect BISRAT AMARE Alt.4 (No ground priority
TOC Building Building 1 Name) ground floor vector to SSC Building Building 1 Name) floor vector
BISRAT
BISRAT Building 1 0.2 0.25 6 0.2181 Building 1 0.5 0.5 4 0.25368
AMARE 1st
AMARE 1st floor 5 1 2 2 0.3663 floor 2 1 2 2 0.352814
Alt.4 (No
Alt.4 (No Name) 4 0.5 1 0.3 0.20122 Name) 2 0.5 1 0.5 0.207359

AMARE ground AMARE

floor 0.1666667 0.5 3.3333333 1 0.21438 ground floor 0.25 0.5 2 1 0.186147

Total 10.166667 2.2 6.5833333 9.3 Total 5.25 2.5 5.5 7.5

AMARE
with respect to BISRAT AMARE Alt.4 (No AMARE priority with respect BISRAT AMARE Alt.4 (No ground priority
FOC Building Building 1 Name) ground floor vector to FSC Building Building 1 Name) floor vector
BISRAT
BISRAT Building 1 2 0.5 4 0.34 Building 1 0.5 1 5 0.258777
AMARE 1st
AMARE 1st floor 0.5 1 2 3 0.28 floor 2 1 1 4 0.339246
Alt.4 (No
Alt.4 (No Name) 2 0.5 1 0.5 0.23 Name) 1 1 1 0.2 0.186585
AMARE ground AMARE
floor 0.25 0.3333333 2 1 0.16 ground floor 0.2 0.25 5 1 0.215392

Total 3.75 3.8333333 5.5 8.5 Total 4.2 2.75 8 10.2

16
Ranked table 1

Weight gained in
Alternatives Buildings Codes Weight gained % Rank
BISRAT Building Alt.1 0.285 28.51% 2nd
AMARE Building 1st floor Alt. 2 0.313 31.32% 1st
Alt. 4No Name Alt.3 0.212 21.21% 3rd
AMARE Building ground floor Alt.4 0.180 17.97% 4th

Ranked Chart 1

Weight gained in %

35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
Weight gained in 0.00%
% AMARE ground Alt.4 (No Name) AMARE 1st floor BISRAT Building
floor

17
 Picture
description

Picture
description

18
 Picture
description

Picture
description

19
 Picture
description

Picture
description

Picture
description

20
2nd Priority site(around 02 local market short listed building information)

No Name of the Codes Address :- Specific name Site/Branch area Contact legal aspect of the Tolerable Rank Other
Building Region/City/ of the area in M2 & Floor person Name building:- renting Negotiation stated
Sub and Phone certificate and period remarks
city/Woreda No others
/street name
or No

1 Building 1 No Alt.1 Woreda 02 Kotebe Metal 130 M2 Acceptable 10 days 2nd

Name
2 Building 2 No Alt.2 Woreda 02 Kotebe Metal 180 m2 Acceptable 10 days 1st
Name

21
22
Subjective criteria for branch evaluation during site supervision
No Major criteria’s Description CODEs weight weight Given Remark

Alt.1 Alt.2

A strategic subjective criteria SSC

1 Relation with the bank strategic values and missions SSC1 0.05 0.011 0.034
2 Existence of potential business partners in the area SSC2 0.05 0.037 0.039
3 Concentration of business centers SSC3 0.03 0.012 0.021
4 Future development perspective of the area SSC4 0.01 0.007 0.009
Total weight A 0.13 0.067 0.103
B Building Features Subjective Criteria FSC
1 Quality of the building FSC1 0.024 0.018 0.021
3 Own and accessible parking FSC3 0.0084 0.0066 0.0071
4 Infrastructures facility, , , running toilet, FSC4 0.0048 0.0034 0.0041
5 Safety and security FSC5 0.0228 0.019 0.020
Total weight B 0.06 0.047 0.0522
Total weight+ B 0.19 0.114 0.1552

No Major criteria’s Description CODEs Weight Weight Remark

given
Alt.1 Alt.2
A Objective Technical Criteria (OTC)
1 Area of the building for the bank OTC1 0.13 0.1 0.1
2 Average distance from main road OTC2 0.03 0.01 0.005
3 Floor OTC3 0.01 0.009 0.007
4 Location and access for ATM OTC4 0.05 0.034 0.040
5 Additional space visibility for billboard OTC5 0.06 0.049 0.048
Total weight A 0.28 0.202 0.2
B Objective Financial Criteria (OFC)
1 Price per sqm OFC1 0.38 0.22 0.31
2 Duration of the contract OFC2 0.07 0.06 0.059
3 Expectation of price adjustment OFC3 0.04 0.01 0.02
4 Amount of dawn payment requested OFC4 0.04 0.04 0.039
Total weight B 0.52 0.33 0.428
Total weight A+ B 0.8 0.532 0.628

23
Ranked table 2

Weight gained in
Alternatives Codes Weight gained % Rank

Building 1 No name Alt.1 0.646 64.60% 2nd

Building 2 No name Alt.2 0.7832 78.32% 1st

Ranked Chart 2

Weight gained in %

80.00%

70.00%

60.00%

50.00%
Weight gained in %
40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00%

0.00%
Building 2 No name Building 1 No name

24
 Picture
description

Picture
description

Picture
description

25
 Picture
description

Picture
description

26
3rdPrioritysite(around kotebe Bus station short listed building information)

No Name of the Building Codes Address :- Specific name Site/Branch area Contact legal aspect of the Tolerable Rank Other
Region/Cit of the area in M2 & Floor person Name building:- renting Negotiation stated
y/Sub and Phone No certificate and period remarks
city/Wore others
da /street
name or
No

1 No Name Alt.1 Near bus Next to 180 M2 0906887716 Acceptable 10 days 1st
station Mineral
minster

27
28
Subjective criteria for branch evaluation during site supervision
No Major criteria’s Description CODEs weight weight Given Remark
to Alt.1

A strategic subjective criteria SSC

1 Relation with the bank strategic values and missions SSC1 0.05 0.036
2 Existence of potential business partners in the area SSC2 0.05 0.039
3 Concentration of business centers SSC3 0.03 0.021
4 Future development perspective of the area SSC4 0.01 0.009
Total weight A 0.13 0.105
B Building Features Subjective Criteria FSC
1 Quality of the building FSC1 0.024 0.018
3 Own and accessible parking FSC3 0.0084 0.0066
4 Infrastructures facility, , , running toilet, FSC4 0.0048 0.0034
5 Safety and security FSC5 0.0228 0.016
Total weight B 0.06 0.044
Total weight+ B 0.19 0.149

No Major criteria’s Description CODEs Weight Weight Remark

given
A Objective Technical Criteria (OTC)
1 Area of the building for the bank OTC1 0.13 0.1
2 Average distance from main road OTC2 0.03 0.005
3 Floor OTC3 0.01 0.007
4 Location and access for ATM OTC4 0.05 0.04
5 Additional space visibility for billboard OTC5 0.06 0.048
Total weight A 0.28 0.2
B Objective Financial Criteria (OFC)
1 Price per sqm OFC1 0.38 0.31
2 Duration of the contract OFC2 0.07 0.057
3 Expectation of price adjustment OFC3 0.04 0.02
4 Amount of dawn payment requested OFC4 0.04 0.039
Total weight B 0.52 0.426
Total weight A+ B 0.8 0.626

29
Ranked Table 3

Weight gained in
Alternatives Codes Weight gained % Rank
No name Alt.1 0.775 77.5% 1st

Picture
description

30
4rdPriority site(near Ayat round about )

No Name of the Codes Address :- Specific name of Site/Bra Contact person legal aspect Tolerable Rank Other
Building Region/City/Sub the area nch area Name and Phone No of the Negotiatio stated
city/Woreda in M2 & building:- n period remark
/street name or No Floor renting s
certificate
and others

1 Alternative 1 (No 50 Meter From Ayat round about 122 m2 0911117292 Acceptable 10 days 3
Name) Alt.1 Ayat To LemiKura infront of beg tera Ato Debebe
Administration
Office
4 Alternative 2 No Alt.2 700 meter from Ayat tafo 200 m2 0987017570 Acceptable 5 days 4
name Ayat to Tafo
2 Alternative 3 No In Front Of 700 meter from 200 m2 0913709797 Acceptable 5 das 2
name Alt.3 LemiCura Ayat roundabout Ato Markos
Administration to the right
Office
3 Alternative 4 No 700 meter from Ayat Tafo 170 m2 0920055836 Acceptable 7 days 1
Name Alt.4 Ayat to Tafo

31
Pair Wise Compression Matrix Each Criteria With Respect To Alternative (Building)

Alt.2( priorit
with respect to Alt.1 No No Alt.3 No Alt.4 No y with respect Alt.1 No Alt.2( No Alt.3 No Alt.4 No priority
TOC name name name name vector to SSC name name name name vector
Alt. 1 (No Name) 1 2 5 0.25 0.175 Alt. 1 (No 1 5 0.33333 2 0.2127
44 Name) 3 66
Alt. 2 0.5 1 7 1 0.087 Alt. 2 0.2 1 0.5 1 0.0425
No name 72 No name 53
Alt. 3 0.2 0.1428 1 2 0.035 Alt. 3 3 2 1 1 0.6382
No Name 571 09 No Name 98
Alt. 4 4 1 0.5 1 0.701 Alt. 4 0.5 1 1 1 0.5
No name 75 No name
5.7 4.1428 13.5 4.25 4.7 9 2.83333 5
Total 571 Total 3

Alt.2( priorit
with respect to Alt.1 No No Alt.3 No Alt.4 No y with respect Alt.1 No Alt.2( No Alt.3 No Alt.4 No priority
FOC name name name name vector to FSC name name name name vector
Alt. 1 1 2 0.5 1 0.22 Alt. 1 (No 1 0.5 1 3 0.2307
(No Name) Name) 69
Alt. 2 0.5 1 2 0.3333333 0.11 Alt. 2 2 1 1 0.5 0.4615
No name No name 38
Alt. 3 2 0.5 1 1 0.44 Alt. 3 1 1 1 0.333333 0.2307
No Name No Name 69
Alt. 4 1 3 1 1 0.22 Alt. 4 0.333333 2 3 1 0.0769
No name No name 23
Total 4.5 6.5 4.5 3.3333333 Total 4.333333 4.5 6 4.833333

32
Ranked table 4

Alternatives Codes Weight gained Weight gained in % Rank

Alt.1(Building 1) Alt.1 0.2061841 20.62% 3
Alt.2(Building 2) Alt.2 0.1155634 11.56% 4
Alt.3(Building 3) Alt.3 0.3377605 33.78% 2
Alt.4(Building 4) Alt.4 0.3816622 38.17% 1

Ranked Chart 3

Weight gained in %

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00%
Weight gained in
% 0.00%
Alt.4(Building 4) Alt.3(Building 3) Alt.2(Building 2) Alt.1(Building 1)

33
34
35
 Picture
description

Picture
description

36
 Picture
description

37
5thPriority site(Kotebe Wosen Grocery area )

No Name of the Codes Address :- Specific name Site/Branch Contact person legal aspect of the Tolerable Rank Other
Building Region/City/Su of the area area in M2 & Name and building:- renting Negotiation stated
b city/Woreda Floor Phone No certificate and period remarks
/street name others
or No
1 No Name Alt. 1 wosen Next to Over 100 m2 0913597592 Acceptable Negotiation 1st
Grocery area Zemen Bank
2 Hacomal Alt. 2 wosen Kara lo traffic Over 120 m2 Acceptable Negotiation Under
building Grocery area light constructi
on
3 No Name Alt. 3 wosen Kara lo traffic 140 m2 Acceptable Negotiation Under
Grocery area light constructi
on

38
39
Pair Wise Compression MATRIX Each Criteria With Respect To Alternative (Building)

with respect Alt.1(Buildin Hacomal Alt.3(Buildin priority with respect Alt.1(Buildin Hacomal Alt.3(Buildin priority
to TOC g 1) building g 3) vector to SSC g 1) building g 3) vector
Alt.1(Buildin 0.58823 Alt.1(Buildin 0.23809
g 1) 1 2 5 5 g 1) 1 5 0.333333 5
Hacomal 0.29411 Hacomal 0.04761
building 0.5 1 7 8 building 0.2 1 0.5 9
Alt.3(Buildin 0.11764 Alt.3(Buildin 0.71428
g 3) 0.2 0.142857 1 7 g 3) 3 2 1 6
Total 1.7 3.142857 13 Total 4.2 8 1.833333

with respect Alt.1(Buildin Hacomal Alt.3(Buildin priority with respect Alt.1(Buildin Hacomal Alt.3(Buildin priority
to FOC g 1) building g 3) vector to FSC g 1) building g 3) vector
Alt.1(Buildin Alt.1(Buildin
g 1) 1 2 0.5 0.29 g 1) 1 0.5 1 0.25
Hacomal Hacomal
building 0.5 1 2 0.14 building 2 1 1 0.5
Alt.3(Buildin Alt.3(Buildin
g 3) 2 0.5 1 0.57 g 3) 1 1 1 0.25
Total 3.5 3.5 3.5 Total 4 2.5 3

40
Ranked Table 5

Code
Alternatives s Weight gained IN % Rank
Alt.1(Building 1) Alt.1 0.35923 35.92297 2
Hacomal building Alt.2 0.192829 19.28291 3
Alt.3(Building 3) Alt.3 0.437941 43.79412 1

Ranked Chart 4

Weight In %

50
40
30
20
Weight In %
10
0
Alt.3(Building 3) Hacomal building Alt.1(Building 1)

41
GIS Map

42
Measure recommendations of the report
Primarily we recommend the bank to hire the proposed sites as soon as possible due to
the delay in time will require to conduct the analysis a gain as well as we will also have a
high possibility of losing the priority sites a gain. To conduct the task in the above-
mentioned scientific way and facilitate the bank’s intervention to the market the
limitation mentioned should be improved. The strategic plan and models of intervention
should be clearly and timely communicated. To have the best of our service delivery and
improve the possibility of the success of the bank we strongly recommend that it will be
important to develop ways communication and a defined schedule time priority fellow for
our works in special distributions. Finally, we are highly motivated to contributedfor the
bank in these scientific interventions to integrate the other banking services for best level
of performance and continuous improvement with the dynamic computations
technologically and scientifically worldwide.

43
References

44
45