ber "The ultimate test of all AAPS No, powerful as they all are indi
actions shall always be the public vidually and collectively as pavers
interest." And second, we must ac- .. of the Road to Serfdom, we have curately and intelligently appraise an even more powerful if less tan- the strength and importance of gible opponent. those tangible and intangible forces Our most powerful and ominous which oppose us. What is the iden- opponent fortunately is also our tity actually of our greatest oppon- strongest potential ally. He i ~ ~ e ent in our struggle to defeat the inertia of every American physiCian forces of regimentation, compul- who does not inform himself of the sion, coercion and despotism? sinister significance of Socialized Our greatest opponent is not Medicine and who does not throw ,Murray, Wagner, Dingell, and his weight against it in whole- '()iliers of their ilk Our greatest hearted, voluntary, intelligent, per- and most powerful opponent is not sistent opposition. He is your col- rsadore Sidney Falk and his army league and mine. He is Doctor ()f workers in the Bureau of Re- Inertia. search and Statistics in the Federal Until that day when a substan- Security Administration. Our tial majority of American Physi- greatest opponent is n?t ~ i k e Davis cians have voluntarily chosen to and his almost unlimited funds affiliate themselves personally with from the Rosenwald Foundation. AAPS, we must keep our eye on 'Our greatest opponent is not the the Bull's eye; we must keep our bosses o t e . . ., e . . o ., f h C I 0 th A F f L eye on the grey blurred lethargic not Governor Warren of California unthinking Bull's eye--the coun- or President Truman, not Com- tenance of our greatest, yes, our munism or the International Labour only really vital opponent, . our Organisation. It is not even the greatest potential ally, our fnend rank growth of the weeds of Pater- and colleague who has not soberly, nalism planted so widely in our sincerely and enthusiastically affi:-:ed d h f his signature to an AAPS apphca- social structure unng t e reign o 'Franklin the Great. tion blank. Publicity and Propaganda in the Government Agencies and Bureaus Congressman Forest A. Harness Chairman, Subcommittee on Publicity and Propaganda of the Committee on E:rpenditztres in Executive Departments in the House of Representatives Presented at the 1947 Annual Meeting of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons I appreciate your cordial and gen- erous reception. Our committee has uniformly received warm support from the medical profession in all parts of the country, and your pro- fessional journals have been most encouraging in their analysis and interpretation of our investigation. Since you are all familiar with the aims and general scope of the sub-committee's work in ferreting out government, propaganda paid for with the taxpayers' money, I shall explore with you tonight one special segment of that inquiry which has not yet been incorpor- ated in a formal report to the House of Representatives. I refer to the closely- knit inter-bureau propa- ganda organization which exists in Washington for the obvious pur- pose of agitating for socialized med- icine, or state medicine, in other lands. The Bureau of Research and Statistics in our own Social Secur- ity Board in Washington is the 5 world headquarters of socialized medicine. The world movement is all paid for by the American tax- payers-and none of it ever has been authorized or approved, as such, by the Congress in its appro- priations measures. As if it were not enough for our medical bureaucrats to be trying to force socialized medicine upon the 140-million people of the United States, they are also forever busy with conferences, round tables, aml special missions to advance social- ized medicine in Japan, China, India, Burma, Indo-China, or Cey- lon. During the last three years they have sent special survey mis- sions to South America, Hawaii, England, and New Zealand. That the American people know nothing of these enterprises is a fact of fundamental significance to our committee. And a fact of almost equal significance is that our medi- cal bureaucrats resent any inquiry from Congress as to what they are up to, or how much they are spend- ing in these overseas promotional campaigns. A third fact of great significance, to my mind, is this: while many of these conferences relate primarily to matters of health service and hos- pital administration, the arrange- ments and programs are almost entirelv in the hands of lay bureau- welfare workers, sta- tisticians, actuaries, specialists in playgrounds, unemployment insur- ance, workmen's compensation or collective bargaining. Rarely, if ever, does a qualified, recognized, and experienced member of the medical profession find a place on these overseas missions. Yet every mission has some aspect of social- ized medicine as a part of its agenda. I submit that these are matters of fundamental significance to the American people. All these over- seas missions and enterprises are supported largely by U. S. funds. Many of the thinkers and planners who throw these conferences to- gether all around the world are full- time employees of the U. S. Gov- ernment. Their salaries range from $4,000 to $10,000 a year. They are supplied with office space, office equipment, secretaries, telephones, stationery-all paid for by the American taxpayers. They get free postage for all their propaganda material, which is distributed liter- ally by the ton from Washington every year. Their reports and find- 6 ings are printed free of charge by the Government Printing Office. Yet all this work is carried on under a cover of secrecy and in- trigue in the Social Security Board and the U. S. Public Health Service -to the point that every inquiry for information must be first regi- stered, approved and cleared by the top level bureaucrats. In the sense that the taxpayer pays all the bills, this is all the public's work. Yet every project is shrouded in almost military secrecy until it is ready in tina! form for the propaganda liter- ature from the Government Print- ing Office. Plans and projects still in the formative stages are simply none of the public's business, as our medical bureaucrats. view their work. The next important international meeting to discuss extension of so- cialized medicine is scheduled to be held in New Delhi, India, October 27 through November 8. This con- ference is called the Preparatory Asian Regional Conference. The agenda includes "proposals looking toward the development of broad social security programs in the countries of Asia." Nominally, this conference is arranged and directed under the auspices of the Interna- tional Labour Office, a remnant of the old League of Nations. The significant thing about the confer- ence is that while the headquarters of the I. L. 0. are in Montreal, Can- ada, the announcement of the New Delhi meeting comes to us from Washington, D. C., where a branch of I. L. 0. is maintained at 734 Jackson Place. Through that office, the work of the I. L. 0. is closely integrated with the studies and proj- ects of the Social Security Board. A number of persons formerly on the staff of the I. L. 0. are now full- time Government workers in the Social Security Board; and a few former employees of the Social Se- curity Board are now on the staff of the I. L. 0. To put it another way, these two offices in Washing ton are but branches of the same enterprise. I. L. 0. is the interna- tional or world arm of the Social Security Board; and the Social Se- curity Board, through the Bureau of Research and Statistics, is but the American operating unit of the I. L. 0. I should make it clear that there is no thought on the part of our investigating committee to inquire into the operations and programs of the International Labour Office. That is a matter far beyond the scope of our authority. Neither may we challenge the funds which are being spent by the United States Government in support of I. L. 0. That program of international co- operation has been duly approved by Congress. But what does interest our Com- mittee is the extraordinary system of working arrangements which exists between the Social Security Board and the I. L. 0. in this mat- ter of socialized medicine. Our investigation has convinced me that 7 the Social Security Board is in fact the supply base, so to speak, from which flow most of the basic studies and research reports which power the I. L. 0. campaign for socialized medicine in other lands. And this conclusion is confirmed by the fact that members of the Social Security staff usually are the U. S. delegates to the I. L. 0. meetings overseas. It will be a difficult and tedious matter to establish, through careful audits, just how much of the funds appropriated by Congress for the domestic work of the Social Secur- ity Board are actually diverted to the world programs of the I. L. 0. But I may say that such an audit is now in process, and that a de- tailed work analysis and project study within the Bureau of Re- search and Statistics of the Social Security Board will be available for the consideration of Congress be- fore the next appropriation bills are considered for Social Security oper- ations in the fiscal year beginning June 30, 1948. You have all read in your news- papers recently the story of the special Health Mission to Tokyo. I shall discuss this mission briefly here, merely because it seems to me to illustrate the whole scheme of the Social Security Board's operations in the world-wide campaign for socialized medicine. A little more than a year ago a federal civilian employee in Washington (one Stanchfield) was detached tempor- arily from his job to go to Tokyo to make a preliminary survey of social security and health needs. Upon his return to Washington early this year, Mr. Stanchfield pro- posed a general health mission to Tokyo. His proposal was presented directly to Mr. Arthur J. Altmeyer, Commissioner of Social Security. Next, on March 5, 1947, Mr. Altmeyer proposed the mission in a formal communication to the War Department. In that letter, Mr. Altmeyer designated the particular individuals who should make up the mission, and then went further to suggest that William H. Wandel, Chief of the Program Division, Bureau of Unemployment Security, be appointed chief of the Social Insurance Division of the Public Health and Welfare Section of the Supreme Command for the Allied Powers in Tokyo. It is perfectly apparent from the letters we have taken from the War Department files that the personnel of this mis- sion and the planning of its pro- gram originated in and was dictated from the Social Security Board in Washington. Up to this point there had been no hint that the proposed Health Mission had been requested or urged either by General MacArthur or any responsible Japanese source. The suggestion came first from Mr. Stanchfield, who had been sent to Tokyo from Washington for that particular purpose. Next, we found a letter, under elate of June 14, 1947, from Mr. Wandel in Tokyo reporting directly to Mr. Isadore Falk in Washington on the progress of the work in Tokyo. In one revealing passage of this letter, Mr. Wandel said: 8 "V\' e think that our need is for someone who is primarily not so much an economic analyst as one yerscd in health insurance. Health insurance is the major field of so- cial security in Japan . . . Perma- nent revision requires amalgamating National Health Insurance with Health Insurance on a compulsory basis." When the Tokyo Health Mission tinally was named, it comprised two men from the Public Health Serv- ice, one from Mr. Falk's Bureau, and one from the Federal Housing Authority. This mission departed for Japan on August 28, this year, with the understanding that Mr. Altmeyer and possibly Mr. Falk would follow when the work had been sufficiently organized in Tokyo. Because this instance offers a shocking demonstration of bureau- cratic intrigue in violation of the purposes and intent of Congress, I have brought the matter to the at- tention of the House Appropriations Committee, with the suggestion that when the next budget comes up from the Social Security Board and the Public Health Service, all those engaged in spreading Socialized Medicine around the world be ken from the public payroll-unless, of course, Congress shall determine to support such world propaganda with funds specifically allocated for that purpose. In my letter to Chairman Taber of the Appropriations Committee, I made eight specific charges against the Tokyo Health Mission. I wish to summarize them here, because they are the nub of our case against the Social Security Board and the U. S. Public Health Service in re- lation to all this propaganda sup- porting Socialized Medicine. My charges against the Tokyo Health Mission are as follows: (I) That the health mission to Japan is romposed entirely and cxcln- si\ely of men long. identified in the public record as advocates and proponents of Socialized Medicine not only in the United States but. throughout the world. (2) That the real purpose of this mission is to lay the groundwork for a system of Socialized Medi- cine in Japan. (3) That the scheme for such a mis- sion originated in the Division of Rese;_trch and Statistics i;1 the Social Security Board in \il/ash- ington, and nowhere else. (4) That the nominal request for the mission was engineerPd through the General Headquarters of thr Supreme Commandn in Tokyo by federal employees sent fr;m \VashingJon for that particular purpose. (5) That General lhug;bs :\lac- Arthur docs not fan1r__:_ancl docs not apprme-any plan to estab- lish compulsorv Socialized M edi- ('ine in Japan. (fi) That the dispatch of this missior. to Tokyo for the purpose indi- cated in Mr. \'Vandel's letter to Mr. Falk under date of June 14, 1947, is a gross misuse of public funds. (7) That the real purpose of the mis- sion is not to assist Japan in working out her basic problems in health and welfare, but to force upon that country a com- 9 pulsory :;ystem of Socialized .\Ieclicine. \ 1l) That although the questions here involnd are of a health and medical nature, the Surgeon Gen- eral of the United States Army was not consulted in reference to the problems involved. I deem it inappropriate for fed- eral employees, at the expense of the American taxpayer, to travel throughout the world preparing or assisting in the preparation of legis- lation to be adopted by foreign countries when similar legislation, long pending, has not been approved by the Congress of the United States. It is interesting also to note how closely the Social Security Board's program to assist the development of socialized medicine in Japan fol- lows the general outline published on October 1 by the International Labour Office for the forthcoming Asia conference at New Delhi, India. Regarding the general ob- jectives of the New Delhi confer- ence, the preliminary hand-book, or work guide, summarizes general ob- jectives in this language: "The report suggests the gradual devcloptrent oi a public medical serYice in the Asian countries \\'hich would he freely ayailable to tl"""' \lh> need it thev Jiyc in urban ur rural and whether they are workers or dependents." This, of course, is a bald pro- posal for the nationalization of all medical services, to be paid for out of the general revenues rather than by special payroll taxes. So the socialized medicine plan for Asia, as now put forward through the I. L. 0. goes even fur- ther than the Wagner- Murray- Dingell Bill for the United The plan for Asia precisel_y the master plan for sociahzed cine as developed in Commumst Russia, where all medical services are the direct function of the gov- ernment, with all costs paid directly from the general funds of the Treasury. It will be interesting to watch the final report and recommendations of the Tokyo Health Mission, to see whether it follows the direct gov- ernment-payment plan put by the I. L. 0. in the New Delhi agenda, or the special payroll tax plan incorporated by Altmeyer, Falk and Cohn in the Wagner-Murray- Dingell Bill. In other words, the Health Mission to Tokyo must make a choice on the Japanese plan. Will that choice fall to the Russian side, with direct medical payments from the general o,r towa_rd the Social Secunty Boards versiOn of socialized medicine under compul- sory health insurance? Another fact of fundamental sig- nificance, as I see it, is that the gov- ernment propaganda which >:ocialized medicine for the Umted States presents a shamefully torted picture of what voluntary m- surance, medical service plans, and hospital pre-payment plans have ac- complished during the last 10 or 15 years. To read the government literature on our health needs, one would !!ain the impression that there had been no change in the in- 10 surance picture in this country dur- ing the last quarter-century. This flagrant distortion of . the picture is a crime against the natr?n. To have the government agenci:s urging their programs on the basis of conditions which have not actu- ally prevailed in this country the 1920's is not only an alarmmg abuse of governmental powers, ?ut a and challenging negation of the entire philosophy of Ameri- can public service. The federal of com- pulsory health insurance insist the problem of pre-payment cal care plans cannot be ad?:mis- tered effectively by the traditional enterprise system of insurance. They ignore the fact,. as reported by the Health and Accident Under- writers Conference, that more than 42.000,000 persons already are cov- ered by various forms of . health ;md accident insurance. Dunng the decade. 1934-44, the number of policies in the United States m- creased five-fold, from roundly 8- million to 40-million. In 1920, ther:e were only 4-million policies of this type. There are more than 400 com- panies offering such policies today, and total premiums in this field of insurance now average about $50- million a month, or $600-million a year. In addition, another group of 5- million persons are enrolled in vari- ous types of pre-payment medical care and hospital service plans. Combining these two groups of insurance arrangements, we find that approximately SO-million peo- ple already are protected by various forms of health and accident insur- ance, as compared with only 4-mil- lion thus protected by their own in- dividual arrangements in 1920. What, then, is the basis of the contention by the advocates of so- cialized medicine that the insurance problem in the health field cannot be handled by the existing insurance system? The fact is that, on the basis of individual coverage, con- siderably more than one-third of the American population already has solved the problem of emergency medical and hospital expenses through the medium of insurance, individually arranged and paid for directly from month to month as an established item in the family budget. In various forms, as determined by the state insurance laws, this type of protection is now available in all of the 48 states. As actuarial ex- perience develops, these plans are being improved from year to year. Intense competition between more than 400 different insurance com- panies tends constantly to offer the insured more comprehensive pro- tection and to eliminate abuses which impair the function of insur- ance principles in the field of health. Concealing or ignoring such fundamental developments in the insurance field during the last quar- ter-century, our medical bureau- crats present an utterly distorted 11 and unreal definition of the problem they presume to alleviate. This systematic distortion is a somewhat universal characteristic of collectivist propaganda methods. Every argument for state-ism must begin with the assumption that no other solution is available, for only a spirit of hopeless defeatism ever can impel men to give up the rights and privileges of freedom in favor of Government regimentation. Another fact of basic significance revealed in our committee explora- tions is that socialized medicine, his- torica!Iv, has always been linked pretty closely with dictator forms in Government. The brand of dictatorship makes no difference--Communism, Fas cism Nazism, Socialism-all are alike: in that they enforce a system of State Medicine. \Vhatever the name of the dicta torship, or whatever the pattern of the particular brand of collectivism in a given country, the system of socialized medicine is always pretty much the same. It is based on com- pulsion, and is generally adminis- tered by a nationwide system of po- litical manipulation. The physicians and surgeons themselves usually are forced to a subordinate position in the determination of policies and programs. Now, if the medical pro- fession and all our hospitals can be taken over by the Federal Govern- ment and forged into a new and gi- gantic health bureaucracy, then it would only be a question of time until \i\Tashington likewise moved into the field of education, religion, the press, the radio. Freedom soon would be in total eclipse. That must not come to pass in mighty America, the last great cita- del of freedom and liberty on the face of the globe today. Ours is a great responsibility to hold aloft the bright torch of free- dom and honest representative gov- ernment. And it has been most en- couraging to know that we have the great body of the American medical profession standing behind us in this effort in Congress. Our figures from the Budget Bureau show that Government ex- penditures for publicity and propa- ganda increased from $28-million in 1941 to $74,829,467 in 1946. Now everybody in Washington recognizes that certain information services are an essential part of any institutional operation. But Con- g-ress insists that there is a clear line of distinction between legitimate information services and those ad- ditional operations which tend to build up public opinion in favor of more projects, broader programs, or federal invasion of new spheres of public service. It is primarily the latter operations which our sub- committee seeks to itemize as to cost and scope. It is my contention that, at least, the people are entitled to know how much they are spending to educate themselves to more spending. It seems to our committee to be a proper function of the Congress 12 to determine whether the diversion of public funds from legitimate purposes to purely propaganda pur- poses for socialized medicine, does not, in fact, constitute a criminal violation of the law. And on this point, I may say that the Federal Bureau of Investigation is giving that qtJ.estion some serious study at the moment. As you know, vve advised the Attorney General, Mr. Clark, last June what we dis- covered about the Htalth Work Shops, and we have since been in- formed that some of the vouchers are in the hands of the FBI for in- vestigation. All this federally-financed activ- ity for Socialized Medicine heads up in the Bureau of Research and Statistics in the Social Security Board. Our Committee investigators have found in that bureau a veri- table nerve center of socialized- medicine propaganda for the entire world. Mr. Isadore S. Falk is the Direc- tor of Research and Statistics in the Social Security Board. He has been in the Government service for some twelve years. He has always been noted for his militant and aggres- sive advocacy of Socialized Medi- cme. Our committee, of course, does not challenge the right of any citi- zen to hold whatever views he may wish on any subject of political or economic policy. But we are interested that funds appropriated by the Congress, for public administration shall not be di- verted to a world-wide system of propaganda calculated to advance socialized medicine the world around. Such operations, until specifically approved by the Congress, are posi- tively illegal. And our committee will not rest until they are uprooted and stamped out of the federal picture. Americans must never fall into the attitude that all sound opinions are made in Washington and handed down full-fashioned to the people. That is the way of dictatorship. Public Opinion must be main- tained in its free and virile state- in full harmony with the great American tradition of liberty. If we do that by stamping out Government propaganda at its roots, 13 then we shall have rendered a great service, not only to medicine, but to the whole cause of liberty and free- dom the world around. We all know that freedom is not free. We all know that bureaucratic power feeds upon itself-and upon the rights and privileges and liber- ties of the people. If we are to support and defend liberty and constitutional govern- ment in America, we must begin by keeping clean and undefiled the well- springs of public information from Washington. Government propaganda poisons these wells of public information. Government propaganda IS a method of dictators. Our purpose will be to uproot and destroy government propaganda wherever we may find it.
David Freemantle - What Customers Like About You - Adding Emotional Value For Service Excellence and Competitive Advantage-Nicholas Brealey Publishing (1999)