APEINFARDT HANOI-HAIPHONG EXPRESSWAY PROJECT. MI-VJEC CONSULTANT J/O Project Code: 268/09 MEINUARDT INTERNATIONAL Head Office: 10* Fl, LILAMAI0 Building, Le Van Luong Extension Y3ECCO, La Ean val Tang 5 ‘Ward 8, Da 3. 3 Ci Minh Ci Street, Trung Van Com., Tu Liem Dist., Hanoi i bh tnag a fn Ct ‘Telephone: +(84.4) 3543 0550/51/52 Fax: +(84.4) 3543 0553, Referenee/Tham chiéu: MUC/16.1/180309.02 Reply to Ref. No/ Tra lai thue sé: Date/Ngdy: 09/3/2018 Date/ Ngay: To: GS Engineering & Construction Corporation - Contractor of Package EX ~ 6 Vinh Linh Hamlet, Thanh Cuong Commune, Thanh Ha Dist., Hai Duong Attention: — Mr. Yoon Jung Min, Project Manager (Gidm doc di dn) ce: VIDIFI, Ha Noi — Hai Phong Expressway Project 8" 9", 10" Fl, LILAMA10 Building, Le Van Luong Extension Street, Hanoi Attention: — Mr. Ding Van Tam, Deputy General Director (Phé Tong Gidm déc) Mr. Pham Viét Son, Deputy General Director (Phd Téng Gidm déc) ct PMB, Ha Noi— Hai Phong Expressway Project VIDIFI, 10" Fl, LILAMA10 Building, Le Van Luong Extension Street, Hanoi Attention: — Mr. Pham Anh Phong, PMB Director (Gidm dée Ban quan If die én) Ce: Meinhardt (Vietnam) Limited va: Dear Sir, Thica Ous ng. No. 23 Tran Nhat Duat, Tan Dinh, District 1, Ho Chi Minh city Mr. Chiu Dung Dat, Infrastructure Director (Giém déc Ha ting ky thudt) Package EX6 - Comments on some issues mentioned in the Contractor’s letter ref, HNP6-18-0003 dated 7/3/2018 in the matter of “Reply the Employer's letter regarding to deduction of Contract value according to the revised cost estimation under conclusions of the Inspector of Ministry of Construction and the State Audit for Package EX6, Hanoi- Hai Phong Expressway Project” ¥ kién cia Tw vin vé mot sé noi dung dé cap trong vin ban cia Nha thau sé HNP6-18-0003 ngay 7/3/2018 vé vige “Tra loi thie cia Chit déu ue vé diéu chink gidm gid tri hop dong theo Dy todn diéu chinh theo két luan cia Thanh tra BG xdy dung va Kiém toén Nha nwéc lién quan dén géi thiu EX6, Due dn ding 616 cao toc Ha Noi — Hai Phong” In reference to / Tham chiéu: 1. Civil Work Contract - EX6 No. 110312.01/VIDIFI-GS dated 12/3/2011, between Vietnam Infrastructure Development and Finance Investment JSC (VIDIFI) and GS Engineering and Construction Corporation. Page 1 of SHop ding. Xay ldp goi thau EX-6 s6 110312.01/VIDIFI-GS ky giita Tong cng ty phat trién hha ting va dau tw tai chinh Vigt Nam véi Tap doan xdy dung va ky thudt GS vao ngay 12 thang 3 nam 2011; . Final-account document A-B of Package EX6 submitted under the Contractor's cover letter ref. HNP6-16-0100A dated 27/9/2016. Hé so quyét ton A-B gi thau EX6 kém theo Van ban so HNP6-16-0100A ngay 27 thang 9 ndim 2016 ctia Nha théu GS. Our letter ref. MU/E/16.1/160929.15 dated 29/09/2017, submitting Final-account document A-B of Package EX6”. Van ban ctia Tw van sé MUE/16.1/160929.15 ngdy 29 thang 9 nam 2016 vé viée dé trinh H6 so Quyét ton A-B g6i théu EX6. . Prime Minister’s Decision No. 1621/QD-TTg dated 29/11/2007, concerning some pilot ‘mechanisms and policies for the investment of Hanoi-Haiphong Expressway Project. Quyét dinh sé 1621/0D-TTg ngay 29 thang 11 néim 2007 ctia Thii nedng Chinh phat vé Mot 6 co ché, chinh sdch thi diém déu te Dye én Dung 6 16 cao t6e Ha N6i- Hai Phong; . The letter ref. 2407/2017/CV-AASC.DA dated 20/07/2017 of AASC Auditing Firm Company Limited, regarding “Auditing Package EX6 under Hanoi-Haiphong Expressway Project”. Van ban sé 2407/2017/CV-AASC.DA ciia Céng ty TNHH Hang kiém todn ASC. ngay 20 thang 7 niim 2017 vé vige “Kiém todin G6i thau EX6 thuge Du én dieimg 6 16 cao tbe Ha N6i— Hai Phing" The Employer’s letters ref. 180212.06/ TCT-PMB HNHP, 180222.02/TCT-PMB HNHP, 180226.01/TCT-PMB HNHP dated 12/2/2018, 22/2/2018 and 26/2/2018 respectively, with respect to “Deduction of contract value according to the revised cost estimation under the conclusions of the Inspector of the Ministry of Construction and the State Audit for Package EX6, Hanoi- Hai Phong Expressway Project”. Cée vin ban cia Chii dau te 86 180212.06/ TCT-PMB HNHP ngay 12 thing 2 ndim 2018, 180222.02/1CT-PMB HNHP ngay 22 thang 2 ndim 2018, 180226.01/TCT-PMB HNHP ngay 26 thang 2 nim 2018, vé vite “ Didu chinh gidm gid tri hop déng theo dy todn diéu chink theo két lun ciia Thanh tra BXD va Kiém todn Nha muéc lién quan dén G6i théu EX6, Die dn dudng 6 16 cao téc Ha N6i- Hai Phong” The Contractor's letter ref. HNP6-18-0002 dated 21/2/2018 replying “the Employer's letter regarding notification on deduction of contract value according to the revised cost estimation under conclusions of the Inspector of Ministry of Construction and the State Audit for Package EX6, Hanoi- Hai Phong Expressway Project” Vain ban etia Nha thdu sé HNP6-18-0002 ngay 21/2/2018 vé viée “Tra I6i thae ctia Chit dw ne vé diéu chinh gidm gid tri hop déng theo Due todn diéu chinh theo két ludn etia Thanh tra B6 xdy dking va Kiém todn Nhe medic lién quan dén g6i thau EX6, Dy dn dueong 6 16 cao téc Ha Noi Hai Phang” Page 2 of 5With reference to the Contractor's letter no. HNP6-18-0003 dated 7/3/208 in the matter of “Reply, the Employer's letter regarding to deduction of Contract value according to the revised cost estimation under conclusions of the Inspector of Ministry of Construction and the State Audit for Package EX6, Hanoi- Hai Phong Expressway Project”, after having reviewed we would provide the following comments: Tham chiéu thie Nha thdu sé HNP6-18-0003 ngay 7/3/2018 vé vige “Tra I6i thue ctia Chai déu te vé diéu chinh gidm gid tri hop dong theo Due todin diéu chinh theo két lun ctia Thanh tra BG xdy dung va Kiém todn Nhd meée lién quan dén g6i thau EX6, Dy an dieing 6 16 cao téc Ha Noi — Hai Phong”, sau khi xem xét, Lién danh Tue van MI-VJEC co y kién niue sau: 1. Article 7. Legal Validity of Audit Reports — State Audit Law No. 81/2015/QH13 dated 24/06/2015 provides that “Audit reports made by SAV are binding upon audited units after they are published in terms of management and use of public finance and/or public property...”, thus: Can cit Diéu 7. Gid tri phdp If cita béo céo kiém ton ~ Lugt Kiém todn nha nude sé 81/2015/OH13 ngay 24 thing 6 ndm 2015; quy dink “Bao cdo kiém todn cia Kiém ton nha mud sau khi phét hanh va cong khai cé gid tri bat bude phai thec hién d6i voi don vi dugc kiém todn...", do dé: The opinions of MOC Inspectorate and State Audit as provided in the notices related to Package EX6 are mandatory legal documents, which bind the Employer and the Contractor of Package EX6 over implementation. ¥ kin ctia Thanh tra b6 xdy dung va Kiém todn nha mei trong cde Thong béo lién quan dén G6i thdu EX6 la van ban phap Wi c6 gid wi bet ube Chti déu ne va Nha théu g6i thdu EXO phéi thuee hién. Pursuant to Item 2c of Article 3 under Decision No. 1621/QD-TTg dated 29/11/2007 of Prime Minister, because the Contractor of Package EX6 is appointed by the Employer the Civil Contract value of this Package shall be adjusted in order to assure that the revised Civil Contract value saves 5% of the approved Revised Cost Estimate Cain cit diéu 3, muc 2c Ouyét dinh sé 1621/OD-TTg ngay 29 thang 11 ndm 2007 ctia Thi neéng Chinh phui, do géi théu EX6 la géi chi dinh thdu, nén gid tri Hop déng xdy ldp phai duoc diéu chinh nham dam bao Gid tri hop déng xdy lép diéu chinh phai tiét kigm 5% gid tri Dw todn diéu chinh dieoe duyét 2. ‘The Final-account document A-B of Package EX6, submitted by the Contractor under the cover letter ref. HNP6-16-0100A, was prepared by the Contractor on basis of the original Contract price. Because the original Contract price is higher than 95% of the revised Cost Estimate that was approved by the Employer, this did not comply with Decision No. 1621/QD-TTg dated 29/11/2007 of the Prime Minister. Hé so quyét todn A-B géi thau EX6 duoc Nha thdu dé trinh tai van ban sé HNP6-16-01004, duoc Nha thau lép trén co sé don gid hop déng géc. Gid tri hop déng goc lén hon 95% gid tri dit todn diéu chinh da duge Chi dau tw phé duyét do dé khong phit hop voi Quyét dinh sb 1621/QD-TTg ngay 29 thang 11 néim 2007 ciia Ther nedng Chin pho. I is not a fully persuasive argument that the Contractor “disagrees with the Employer's unilateral determination of the Revised Contract value ... based on Sub-clause 70.2 — PA Conditions of Particular Application because the Contractor finds that the Employer is using this Clause incorrectly” without providing any justification for his argument. 3. Page 3 of 5Vige Nha thdu khong déng ¥ Chui déu tw don phucong dn dinh gid tri hop dng diéu chinh cin cit vio diéu 70.2 BKCT- Hop ding xdy lép vi cho ring Chir dé ue dang vin dung diéu Khodn néy cha ding ma khong dua ra bat kj co sé ching minh cho lép lun ctia Nha thdw la thiéu thuyét phuc. We then suggest that the Contractor should provide explanations for his opinion fully based on the Contract conditions in order to prove his argument. Tee vin dé nghi Nha thdu giai trinh kién néu trén vi déy dit cic co sé hop déng dé ching mink cho lép ludn ctia Nha tha 4. In his letter, the Contractor also says that “there are some dispute matters in Package EX6 was outstanding and not yet settled down thoroughly”. However, in our opinion there is no Contract dispute at this moment, except for the proposals made by the Contractor with respect to payment for some items (surplus Ht stage 2, 3; relocation of public utilities, etc.) which were not accepted by the relevant parties (including the Employer, Independent Audit, State Audit, etc.) due to lack of proper foundations and supporting documents. Nha théu dé cép dén ede vin dé tranh chép cin t6n dong vii chica deoc gidi quyét writ dé, tuy nhién theo ¥ kién ctia Tu van, Hién géi thiu EX6 khong tén dong bdt kj tranh chap hop dong néio, ngoai trit cdc dé xudt thanh todn cho mét sé hang muc (Ht due giai doan 2,3; di dei ich:....), tuy nhién do cdc hang muc dé xudt nay thiéu co sé va hd so ching minh nén da khéng duge Tue vén va cdc bén lién quan (bao gém Citi déu tu, Kiém todn déc lap, Kiém todin Nha med...) chap thugn. Accordingly, as recommended by the Contractor with respect to the clarification of every dispute matter, we require that the Contractor promptly summarize/ collect all the contractual disputes and relevant documents and submit to us by 13/3/2018. Theo kién nghj cia Nha thau, aé lam séng 16 cc tranh chp con tén dong, Lién danh Tee véi ‘MI-VJEC yéu cau Nha théu nhanh ching tp hop todn b6 cde tranh chap hop déng cing cdc hé so lién quan dé trink lén Tw van trucdc ngay 13 thing 3 nam 2018. With the above comments, in order to ensure that the Civil Contract value of Package EX6 conforms to Decision No. 1621/QD-TTG of the Prime Minister and the opinions of MOC Inspectorate, State Audit and Independent Audit, the Contractor is required to promptly provide explanations/ justifications for his opinions and arguments as well as to cooperate with the Employer in finalizing and submitting the revised Civil Work Contract value of Package EX6 as well as revised Final-account document A-B in accordance with the Contract conditions and applicable regulations about the Final-account. Voi céc ¥ kién néu trén, dé dim bao gid iri hop ding xdy lip Géi thdu EX6 tun thi ding sheo Quyét dink sé 1621/QD-TTG ciia Thi tedng chinh phi, ding thai tudn thii cde ¥ kién ctia Thanh tra 66 xdy dung va Kiém todn nha meéc, Kiém todn déc lp. Lién danh Tw vin MI-VJEC aé nghi Nha: thu nhanh chong gidi trinh céc y kién néu trén, dong thoi hop téc voi Chui du te dé hoan thign va dé trinh Gid tri Hop déng xdy Idp diéu chinh cing nue Quyét todn A-B diéu chink theo diing quy dinh cia Hop déng va ede quy dink hign han lién quan lién quan dén céng tée Quyét todn We highly appreciate your effort in cooperation and implementation of the foregoing. thdu trong viée hop tée va thee hién cde van dé néu trén, Tu van dénh gid cao su né lue ctia Page 4 of Sjincerely, giiém Xudin Hing . ‘Acting Project Director/Quyén Gidm déc Dy: én Mobile: 0983.668.675 Email: hungnx.mivj@gmail.com Attachment’ Dinh kem: 1. The Employer's letter ref. 180212.06/ TCT-PMB HNHP, 180222.02/TCT-PMB HNHP, 180226.01/TCT-PMB HNHP . Cae van bén ctia Chit déu te sé 180212.06/ TCT-PMB HNHP, 180222.02/TCT-PMB HNHP, 180226.01/TCT-PMB HNHP. 2. The Contractor's letter ref. HNP6-18-0002 ngay 21/2/2018, HNP6-18-0003 dated 7/3/2018 Cac van bin ctia Nhé théu sé: HNP6-18-0002 ngay 21/2/2018, HNP6-18-0003 ngdy 7/3/2018 Ms. Nguyén Thj Thai Yén, QS : Page 5 of STONG CONG TY PHAT TRIEN HA TANG VA DAU TU TAT CHINIT VIET NAM VIEUNAM INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCE INVESTMENT 2S $0 ers -LILAMA 10 Asking Le Vanaxrg Eins Seti VanConmnne~ Tu Lin cit Hoh Tel: 84-4 3771 1668 Fax: 8443771 1671 S6/Ref: 180212.96 /TCT-PMB HNHP Neen’ Date: 1202-2018 thau thi cong Géi thu EX-6 (Nha (hau EX-6); -TVGS To: - The Contractor of EX-6 (Contractor of EX-6); - The Engineer Vé vige: Théng bao vé vi digu chinh theo két ludn cla Thanh tra BO Xay dung va Kiér nha nude Tin quan dén Goi thau EX-6, Dy an dung 6 16 cao toc Ha N6i - Hai Phong Subject: Notification on deduction of contract value according to the rev cost estimation under the conclusions of the Inspector of the Ministry of Construction and the State Audit for Package EX-6. Hanoi — Hai Phong Expressway Project _ Can eit Hop ding xay fp sb 110312.0U/VIDIFI-GS gitta Tor trién Ha ting va Dau ti ti chinh Viét Nam (Chi dau tu) voi Tap dos K§ thudt GS (Nha thiu) vé vige thi cng Goi thiu EX-6 (Hop dong, Pursuant to Civil Work Contract No, 110312.01/VIDIFI-GS signed by and between Vietnam Infrastructure Development and Finance [rv Joint Stock Company (the Employer) and GS Engineering & Construction Corporation (se Contractor) on the construction of Package EX-6 (the Contract), Can cit Thong bio s6 S7/KL-1Tr ngiy 12/02/2014 eda Thanh tra bo Xay Dene yi vige Két ludn thanh tra Cong tic quan ly dau tu xay dug cia Tong cong ty Phat tridm he ting va Daw te tai-chinh Vigt Nam: ~~ With reference to Notification No. S7/KL-TTr dated 12 Febuary 2017 Inspector of the Minisery of Construction regarding conclusion on inspection of construction investment management of Viemam Infrastructure Develupmient an Finance Investment Joint Stock Compairy Can cit van ban sé 384/KTNN-TH ngay 31/12/2014 giti kém theo Bao cao kiém toan hogt dong xy dung va vide iu nr cia Dur An during 6 td cao tac Ha NOi - Hai Phong: With reference to document No. 384/KINN-TH dated 31 December 204 bs the State Audit attached to the Report on auditing the construction activities and management, using investment capital of Hanoi ~ Hai Phang Expressway Project ter by theCin et Thong bio s6 105/TB-KTNN ngay 20/01/2017 cha Kiém toan ohs nude théng béo két quit kiém ton hoat dong xay die du tr cia dur dn dutmg 6 16 cao toc Ha Noi ~ Hai Phong, With reference 1 Notification No. 105/TB-KTNN dated 20 Jar the State Audit regarding notification on the result of auditing the construction activiries and management, using investment capital ef Hanoi — Hai Phong Expressway Project. . : 1g Cong ty Phat trién ba ving va Dau tr ta diéu chinh gid ti Hop dng theo dir ton nine cho Goi t va vige ¢ evelopment and Fins Company (FIDIFI) kindly: inform the adjust compliance with the cost estimation adjusted according 10 comments of the Inspector of the Ministry of Construction and the State Audit for Package EX-6 as follows: 1}. Gid tri dy todn sé digu chinh [&; 2.803,908.303. The cost estimation value will be adjusted » VND 2,803.998.303. 2. Gid tr Hop déng can dig chinh gid dé dam bao gid ti Hep don: vugt qué 95% gid ti dy todn dieu chink cba g6j thé theo quy dinb ti Quyé: $8 12UQD-TTe.ngay 29/11/2007 eda Thu tyong Chink phi (seu khi qui do* a yé mat mat bing so sanh). The Contract value to be reduced to ensure that the Canmact value se exceed 95% of the adjusted cost estimaticn of the Pachasse as sti No. 162VOD-TTe dated 29 November 2007 hy the Prime Mauser conversion to a comparative hasts) 3. Gid ti Hop ding sau digu chinh ta 34.7 NB (Chi tiét thé hign trong bang dinb kem) The Contract value afier adjustment is USD 2,018,844, 884,979 (details presented in the attached sheet) VIDIFI d8 nghi Nha thdu EX-6 ngbién ci va key Phu tue bop: ding gi ti Hop dong voi gid tr} nbu wéo 48 fam co 7 nghj Nha thau EX-6 06 van ban ard lai VIDIFI ve van dé nay trude ngay 23/2/2 ‘Trong trong hop dén ngay 23/2/2018 Nha thau EX-6 Khéng 9 phan hai, VIDIFL s€ yéu cau Te van a jam todn doc Mp cin ctr trén ndi dur tri Hop ding ahir kém theo dé tinh toan gidm wir gid of quyét tar EX TISVND faqpens 049 USD va 2 34,789,049 and @ND We, FIDIFI kindl Contract Addendum with the aforesaic payment of the Cantract, The Contractor is requested 10 send a VIDIFI before 23 Febuary 2018. If by 23 Febuary 2018, she Contac to respond, we, VIDIFT shail ask the Engineer and the in caleulating the deduction of the final payment value of the } the deduction content of te Contrict valtte. review and sign {value te provie ash: age ENG, hasing on__ VIDIFI théng béo dé Nha thiu EX-6, Tur vin gidm sat va ede bin Tién quan 4 bidt va thyc hién. This is to notify the Contractor EX-6, the Engineer and the concerned parties _for understanding and implementation. ‘Tran trong! Noi nhgn: = Chi tch HDQT (46 bie): - Ban Tong Giam Ade (48 bie): - Ban QLDA HN-HP; = Lin VTW EX-6- Dyran exo the Ha NG - Hai Phong ‘Tong bgp gia tei Hop ding dibu chink Goi th (Gi i op ing Oi nh (ing ser MO TA CONG viRC [CONG TAC IN THUONG, FT Joona pat 4 [oonG TACTHOAT NODC z [SAN PHAMASPHALT VAST DUONG = Jc i i a tr 2% ho Hong mye de who carga an Sg EST Thee GA FAW FAVS (Chaz C VAT (a4 CP aoNs [OU PHONG oy pif CAISHGIA C ‘ONG. THAWED) TONTONG CONG TY PHAT TRIEN HA TANG VA BAU TU TAI CHINH VIET NAM VIETNAM INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCE INVESTMENT JSC ‘0h fas -LJLAMA l0BikogLe Van Lug Estnsion Stect—Thng Vin Carmen —Tu Lem Distt Hanok ii Tel: 84-4 3771 1668 __ Fax: 84-4 3771 1671 _ MEVIEC HIN-EP Expressway Project HO Receive be TST : 180222.0/TCT-PMB HNHP Ngdy/ Date: 22/02/2018 Bea | Kin iti — thi céng G6i thau EX-6 (Nha thau EX-6); -TV for] - The Contractor of EX-6 (Contractor of EX-6); - The Engineer Hevigc: pidu chinh giam gid tri hop déng theo dur todn diéu chinh theo két Juan cia Thanh tra BG XAy dumg va Kiém toan Nha nuéc lién quan én Goi thau EX-6, Dy dn during 6 td cao toc Ha N6i - Hai Phony ] : . a Subject: Deduction of contract value according to the revised cost estimation under the conclusions of the Inspector of the Ministry of Construction and the State Audit for Package EX-6, Hanoi — Hai Phong Expressway Project Can ctr Hop déng xay lip sé 110312.01/VIDIFL-GS gitra Téng céng ty trién ha ting va Dau tu ti chinh Viét Nam (Chu dau tu) véi Tap doan Xay dl va K¥ thuat GS (Nha thdu) vé viée thi cong Goi thu EX-6 (Hop déng); Pursuant to Civil Work Contract No. 110312.01/VIDIFI-GS signed by between Vietnam Infrastructure Development and Finance Investment Joint Stock Company (the Employer) and GS Engineering & Construction Corporation (the Contractor) on the construction of Package EX-6 (the Contract); Can cit Thong béo sé S7/KL-TTr ngay 12/02/2014 cia Thanh tra b} Xay lufin thanh tra Céng tac quan ly dau tu x4y dung cia Téng céng ty Phat trién ha ting va Dau tu tai chinh Viét Nam; With reference to Notification No. 57/KL-TTr dated 12 Febuary 2017 by the Inspectorate of the Ministry of Construction regarding conclusion on inspection of construction investment management of Vietnam Infrastructure Development and Finance Investment Joint Stock Company; Can cit van ban s6 384/KTNN-TH ngay 31/12/2014 cia Kiém toan nha nuée giti kém theo Béo cdo kiém toan hogt dng x4y dung va viée quan ly, sir dung vén dau tu cita Dy an dung 6 16 cao téc Ha NGi - Hai Phong;With reference to document No. 384/KINN-TH dated 31 December 2014 by the State Audit attached to the Report on auditing the construction activities and management, using investment capital of Hanoi — Hai Phong Expressway Project; Cn cit Théng béo sé 105/TB-KTNN ngay 20/01/2017 cia Kiém toan nba nude théng béo két qua kiém ton hoat dng xay dung va viée quan ly, sit dung vén ddu tu cila dur 4n dudng 6 t6 cao the Ha Néi- Hai Phong; With reference to Notification No. 105/TB-KINN dated 20 January 2017 by the State Audit regarding notification on the result of auditing the construction activities and management, using investment capital of Hanoi - Hai Phong Expressway Project, ‘Téng Céng ty Phat trién ha ting va Dau tu tai chinh Viét Nam (VIDIFH) 4a nhan durge van ban sé HNP6-18-0002 ngay 21/02/2018 cha Tap doan ay dimg va Kg thuat GS (Nha thu EX-6) vé vigc tra loi thu cia Chi dau tu ve théng-bio Hiéu chinh gidm gid tri hop déng theo dy toan digu chinh theo két luan-ciatPhant} tra B6 Xéy dung va Kiém todn Nha nude lién quan dén Géi thau EX-6, Duran dung 6 t6 cao téc Ha N6i - Hai Phéng. Sau khi xem xét ¥ kién cla Nha thau EX-6, VIDIFI cé ¥ kién nhu sau: We, Vietnam Infrastructure Development and Finance Investment Joint Stock Company (VIDIFI) received document No. HNP6-18-0002 dated 21] Febuary 2018 by GS Engineering & Construction Corporation (the Contractor EX-6) on replying the Employer's letter regarding notification on deduction of contract value according to the revised cost estimation under the conclusions of the Inspector of the Ministry of Construction and the State Audit for Package EX-6, Hanoi — Hai Phong Expressway Project. Upon reviewing the Contractor EX-6’s comments, we, VIDIFI have following comments: - Diéu 70.2 DKCT (Diéu kién cu thé cia Hop déng) c6 quy dinh: “Néu, sau ngay ky két Hop déng, tai ddt nude ma Céng trinh dang due thi céng hode sé duge thi céng cé nhitng thay aéi vé dao ludt edp Quéc gia hode Nha nuéc, Sde lénh, Nghi dinh hode Ludt phdp hotic cde quy dinh holic ludt Ié ctia dia phurong hoe co quan chite ning hay cé sy ban hénh méi dao ludt, scic lénh, nghi dinh, ludt, quy dinh hoGic ludt Ié gay ra viée tang hode gidm chi phi ctia Nha thau, ngodi sit tang hoge gidm da néu trong ede Khodn truée ctia Diéu nay, trong khi the hién Hop déng, thi chi phi bd sung hode gidm bot 8 dege K¥ swe xdc dink, sau Khi tham van v6i Chi déu tu va Nha théu, va sé duge bé sung vao hotc gidm bér tir Gié Hop déng va K§ su sé théng bdo cho Nha théu, cimg m6t ban sao giti cho Chi du tu. Bat ké cdc quy dinh trén, cdc chi phi tang va gidm dé sé khong dugc thanh todn riéng hodc ghi vao bén cé néu chi phi 46 da duge tinh trong viée ghi chi soExpressway Project is one of the objects that must seriously execute the conclusions of the State Audit and the Inspectorate of the Ministry of Construction. The conclusions and recommendations of the State Audit and the Ministry of Construction Inspectorate are legally binding on the subjects to auditing, inspection and relevant units. Such matters are totally compliance with provisions of Sub-clause 70.2-PA of the Contract. Therefore, the conclusions of the State Audit and the Inspectorate of the Ministry of Construction on requesting the reduction of the value of the estimated cost of the Package EX-6, which leads to the reduction of the contract value by VIDIFI and the Contractor to ensure the contract value not exceeding 95% of the adjusted cost estimation value of the Package under the Prime Minister's Decision No. 1621 / QD-TTg dated November 29, 2007, is fully compliance with the provisions of the Contract and regulations of Vietnam. VIDIFI théng bao dé Nha thau EX-6, Tu van gidm sét va cdc bén lién quan dé biét va thyc hién. This is to notify the Contractor EX-6, the Engineer and concerned parties for understanding and implementation. Tran trong./. Yours faithfully, -—-| 7 rr 7 1 7 fa fs Famer pr oa wang a aor eNOa Tp sa $ aaron : rea iz Pawo Jo sfurnei sy0?>eH09 ene Ture pt a be 7 ars wasee pr 7 Sar SNAHD NYD NFA Dyd| SINaWauindmeTvuanaa| | NYE NY NYA OY: ENOISLAIG non om as — cas] "RR |iaxoa] —aaronqoaiwonin — | asa | semumomsonouanersia | 20 oN¥ wyaurur | a0 guru NT Ha TOT giiunq _|sxutiwvndwonesodion 00+ 2u54~ ocecau ca eDexoe, fod femsaidy Bud eHION PH wen 29 Bape 406 ws. 0c Bao Suen wet PU HD ups po a me uPEI go 292 hy BugoBup> yr Bug 3.099 eH PIP FD, ms onc ©0000" 000'E GRA sm4d w9 AS fo 02 yyw anny fo woyrnong po woe = quOua arENSTrET FS SaYRTONOS THOTT FTW. cowcwomes | - [wenowowe | - Bap ieqante oR READ] SL Ese po iar a > Beas Bes or 9 fue rommesa per waa eorta PS ooses*ese'P0L"9 sezse'ss | 1680's 1 joos'se Bugi 9g ee ued “Apx 904 ¥p MD ¥pY “PHY AP Heid] END 4 Sapte tmouss| £00020 wowsaseuse | ecuurie yeu : 3 [cows ure | srowos fore 8] gg ana sep gr uy Bu» : | l gn yn ep 2 ‘ 2NgD ML NYA HN Wy som aus anon ana) up quea| ana) wi uog a Noa 2914 DNQD OW DNV un | SWaLIyRIOM 40 NOLLARIDSIa iuiiwvaa ES a HOTTENYHid ONOO ENOISINIGT THE -WIOL BADSO[ Wes Tore oe wBueT) auc OonmeRT ——eF-00GE0 ape do) wre sana] — 206 aa gH9 0 909] — a GoTo aman wa TORTANND mes] — UFO apm ep eipl —s1 Tap po womans] — 50 ‘eauoupal e050 somos — 2a Le a ‘eM wowenesgo} —— €2-008e0. © aig nuaes oma] — 2-50 oo a NS uEaG| — HOODEO oo Pam pug 009] 0-050. “ ara ou ae ES AR] — HOSED w Grad wesenen penned] — zon a= Sg Yor pouty] — [FEE aa BUNUN eS Hes] EEE IPOS a ou 2 ow a aE] 1D —| ag pur oaveag Fry oH wo a ‘Gopwesy ance] Zor ou (Gov mots te] — Toor ers | oH UES a TE RI peers posr | 1000 a nabs inewnntial — oOvoreD | a waragape| ws vopebdogimuones| —SOm0rD cu ‘Wap app Baga pp A Bond wi] wr _odoig Bi804y9D Jo UoqENASLOD| — ¥O-O0PEO_ ‘Aen oun dgp Bund ui] wre Te§= Beaty 9409 sve JO UogonsLOD| "OO-GOHE ow Tos OMB ‘oe po wep dor sone ued wew Bago wpu do” Bago Pues asinog mayen s0Ae’ WuauN_UEQUS Jo UOR-NLASLOD) o-oort wr a a = wa w w a a wi ~ por — apna sop oF Toyo wouog| BEE wos ya D¥L OND SSMOMITLVa|_F NOSTATE ubart Toi |isxoa] —oatnovgaaawaven | ann | suautsmow zonousnosia | 2nWDNv Sung |sxutvnowopeitieg uonannwon SupsenB3 $9 case oesceuy xa eyed olla Aenean BU MON EH FROSWOR Tw WOE ‘Sivadl wRea wD] 20 Mh sea | ead uses we9) ov adi "aieg wo] edi aseg 9] edi seg 9] Vile cast=a'won Sup Br gaa BNO] 2 cos ps Wot 052-0 wea fups pens eae ad 05-0 9 rao Ba "it 05720" Wi Bugo rene nao] "Yad oSic0 no pow a HHT Hi scot oo oor 190995" 099 \sls|5|5| sass eousoce FCT ERT I, Wace fe| lele| jelelee) ereretey ; an rouge ase wn sac pu = ao aqebmiomapr att a a a i at 20 TaLsse6 fpr teray——[pewoset a ‘yas ad om] — iano = es pve at ocna| ay won smuow aovarvaal SA (ana) (asa) (QNA) ‘ON ONWH vgn amen | agnauru | wituoa swan 0K soNonanosua | NN DNTH Wo Hy Supp dOmeted Lopeiodiog uonenneuon Bupseuibua so 00szzun ~ ooeeou ‘ese obeyed oeoig Kemaeasdes Buoua JAIN ET SOSA TIS WOT sone wars — [ere a SRT ea seg SLM AE = “a sma wa wa PTL PTY am 0] SSO ea9 og FH oo GSEs) ose FH HUY Ey “taling) SSsuIGIy "esNoD eq PAIRS yeUdsy| a Tava Hep eis Bo 9 pH “Uug/ Soup "esiN6S PUB BV] [eo Tab ep i pH aN don] WES aug Ss 199 FG | ‘| ag ep ugg Bugg waa um ga igur doy] w bs Talipg sso EID eT tw | aod Rep Bugg Koga Wigs Bagi ga yew don] "ws “aauipy SeeuIN "88INOD BDEUNS DWV) oo Tan ep ALO OOH ATUA| WHE TUL EE Oo EY on (Ni Bupa Buonp yew ip val do} a vw 9a 97] _sosunog soeying pu sepulg sy8:0U09 yaya wo zw —— [aa } papa whe woes wisest ero veo om UA ap Ws ep ut aaa uu oS aL pa nana} ype yarrvmary wynan es SINaWaAVAaNY sIDnGoua.LIvHasy] SVE | exon (asa) roux | Is 391A 9NQD OM ONE ann] swausomsoNousnossa — | ON ONE wiiuog | /Autiuvadwoneodion uoronieuos supdbaire® = —N+\ wosezunt = encoun oa oberon nbn Soneestra Boo HON HA we DeHD Foam ae TU RSNA] 1-O0EO oa oro 0 aor or CT TEs ore ssw cz ECCT sow ecv PZT ecee't mi uo eo opt ft Baby se BH | os) yor ured ew 07 -An yur 00 (Be gy ew Uy Bun a oe xys0 soune5 ssa 19 sup MIS) we = aD] fers . prota 9) suey portasig mur] HONS 539 osc ow wre 09 sven wo wn E agra PLE TAG ‘ayo YA DNOL.gA| (axa) (asm) (GNA) (asa) | Noa Nv egw | sqnamen | peeoa | tung | 10m | ianow 281A NOD DAW ONT sux | SHauIonIOM A0NoLLAMIDSaa | ORM ONVE xutLwvad aL RD agp TATwee asa SL | ‘ses = ous = wit m0 ~ ware | weeerier aoe | “ar pw Ura pHa dp] we Sani Baa a STs ost su a Ta Fo rw is”|__ sign Sopot Ys UBUD 3H] c TayoudniA oe] Garon OnE ar waste [Fee LSS OU opp Tr wp] we PAD LAWSON MDS COE (axa say] ONDA ee a 3914 9NQ9 SAW ONVEE aa | swan stom so Noutamosaa | SAW ONVIE renin) “ona ap aTame —!0\ oofonfemsnesdrs Oud WHFION eH ‘WeINS HRD gD TBTT PRT BoaTET SRR TORRE ATTIET a (Qo0eOODFINE SI AT = WaAIRD xoa] ~ Te-OSEBO = oo i ross z tooon arava a tren — cy ‘(oozexo0s9) an aah = waayn9 xog)zi-os600 | a | ear a a a i = See eee ee 1 twos | outsexgoonwoxen [ann | skamrsmon zonouanosia | 2WONve aanwoperodiog uonsnasuog Buueouibu3 so nn z 8H WENO long mS BDU FH ON TROBE TT TTOL GSTS aa STENT a TaROSC=T'V aK, STEHT oP] ‘SEN aH ‘aguoys onoo| onion tas] cNoIstata, (ana) (as) (anad (asa) | oxda7 wana | one | GE | GSR | “tower Jinwe] —— atis2xqvomwoxsn | ann | swauimonsononanosaa | AEN : auiixynd a Ap MATTvonsiodio9 wopanieve> Buveewibug $9 =< onoezz494~ooescouy xa eBeyoed ofan femsssidr3 Buoua eH-ON eH TAYE DHS Lae or GE aTN OR NETO TOS MIG] — UT fz = f = ea w weave ss “ | auc ie « ‘ny mouay pi ind npn sn con 7 (oma ly) | ns eR see ozo won so-oa8e0 esesr jue oe | arrevoe — fos, omen faw auinyp yw2nond ond urea] [soars awy manana vou (@Na) (asn) a | exam awa | wtwa | or" | nwa) — samowootwown ann | swaurmomsononarcsaa | 2640 assay ‘a9 nD Bugp dp‘DENYHASNOD, OF NOISIATOIO- TN WLOL "Sua $7 5085] “RaWeURE TW dud 3215003] “ae ny] "axed aY| e815] FBT TORN aAIRNN5| wo 10) a0 eo ‘orn ‘9N99 avon SRHOMAYA| oy Norstata noon (ana) (ana) (aso) | “ion _| ino 381A 9NQD DAN DNL ann | swan nom soNouanDsaa — | ON ONVE vg ae, wtuoa | widuod |citinvno ipo avest Manegement Offic of Hemoi-iti Phone Expresneny Package EX-& pb Link Hare Thash Cuone Commas, Th Tis Dea Ts iaes20 S604 Far 320) 38/6008 GSESsC Our Ref. No.: HNP6-18-0002 | Hanoi, date on 21* February 2018 Tham chiéw sé: HNP6-18-0002 Ha NGi. ngay 21 thing 02 nam 2018 Attention VIETNAM INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT AND FINACE INVESTMENT JSC Kink grt TONG CONG TY PHAT TRIEN Hs TANG V4 DAU TU TAI CHINH Attention: Mr. Dang Van Tam — Deputy General Director of VIDIFI Kinh git : Ong. Dang Vin Tam ~ Phd Téng Gidm dée VIDIFT Attention: Mr. Pham Anh Phong — Director of Project Management Board Kinh git : Ong. Pham Anh Phong-Giém déc Ban quan iy dir én Mr Nghiém Xuan Hing ~ Acting Project Director of MI-VJEC JO. ME HN-HP Expressway Project |. Ong Nghiém Xuan Hig — Quyén gidm ade die an lién danh TVGS MI-VJEC HO Received : Reply the Employer’s letter regarding notification on deduction of contract value according to the revised cost estimation under conclusions of the Inspector of Ministry of Construction and the State Audit for Package EX6, Hanoi - HaiPhong Expressway Project. Tra lori thu ctia Cini ddu tw vé thang bao vé viée diéu chinh giam gid iri hop déng theo dd todn diéu chink theo két ludn ctia Thanh tra B6 Nav dung va Kiém tocin Nha mec lin quan dén géi thdu EX6. Dy dn dang 6 t6 cao t6e Ha Noi - Hai Phong. Sin/Thncer nga Pursuant to Civil Work Contract No. 110312.01/ VIDIFI-GS signed by and between Vietnam Infrastructure Development and Finance Investment Joint Stock Company (the Employer) and GS Engineering & Construction Corporation (the Contractor) on the construction of Package EX-6 (the Coniract):The contract value is: 2.773.000.000.000 VND ( in words: Two thousand seven Inndred and seventy three billion Vietnam Dong) . Currently The Contractor has completed the construction and civil works in accordance with the provisions of the Contract, Can ctr Hop déng xdy ldp sé 110312.01/VIDIFI-GS giita Tong eéng ty Phat trién Ha tang va Dau S (Nha thé) vé viée thi cing am (Chit die ur) vai Tép oan Xdy deeng vii KF thu 100.000.000 VND (Bing thi céng va hoan ne tai chinh Vigt hit: Hai Gti thé EX-6 (Hop ding), Gi n odin th 2 Addy meat ZC EhGS Project Mauazoment Oc of Hano-Hsi Phong Expressway Package EX-6 a “Vin int Fant Tran Con ‘Tha He Disc. at Oona Tal 880526) 5856006~" 0) 381606 GST Our Ref. No.: HNP6-18-0002 Hanoi, date on 21% February 2018 Tham chiéu sé: HNP 6-18-0002 Ha N6i, ngay 21 thang 02 nam 2018 However. pursuant the Employer's letter No 180212.06/TCT-PMB HNHP dated 12/02/2018 regarding “Notification on deduction of contract value according to the revised cost estimation under conclusions of the Inspector of MOC and the State Audit for Package EX6, Hanoi - Hai Phong Expressway Project. The Contractor would like to answer the given issue as below: Tuy nhién vao ngiy 12/2/2018, Chni déu tir ban hanh vin ban sé 180212.06/TCT-PMB HNHP vé viée “Thong bdo vé vige diéu chinh gidm gid tri hgp déng theo dw todn diéu chink theo két Indn 1S gid gic p i uli ¢ aifyee = Thanh tra B6 Nay dung va Kiém todn Nha medic tién quan dén g6i thu EX6, Dy én dieng 6 16 cao ant Ha Noi - Hai Phang”. Nha thd xin ira 164 Chit ddu ne vé vin dé nagy nue sexu Tbe Noi, 1. The Contractor does not agree with the situation that The Employer unilateral fixed the revised’™# contract value as 34,789,049 USD and 2.018.844.883.979 VND. S Nha thdu khéng déng ¥ vi vige Chhi ddu tie don phirong dn dint gid tri Hop déng diéu chink la 34,789,049 USD vii 2.018.844.883.979 VNB. The Contractor does not understand on which terms of the Contract to unilaterally fixed the Revised Contract Value. Requesting The Employer to answer by official documents about these basis no later than 23/2/2018, In cases there are no replies from The Employer before 23/2/2018, the situation will be understood as The Employer was wrong in unilaterally fixing the|Resised Contract Value and did not comply with the provisions of the Contract. Nhat shu Hhing hiéu Chi dé te edn ott vio diéu Khoan nao eita Hop déng dé don pinsong dn dinh gid wri Hop déng diéu chink. Dé nghi Chi dau tu c6 van ban wa 161 Nha thdu vé cde can 2018 Chui dau te khong cd phan mardi ngdy 23/2/2018, Trong mrucdng hap dén ngay 23 Indi thi Guepe hiéu la viée Chit déu te dom phneong diéu chinh gidm gig tri Hop déng la hoi oan sai va khing tudn thi theo diing cde guy dink cia Hop déng. 3. ‘The Contractor assert that pursuing the Civil Work Contract No. 110312.01/ VIDIFI-GS, The Employer accepted the bids documents of the Contractor and Direct Contracting price is: 773.000.000.000 VND ( in words: Two thousand seven hundred and seventy three billion jetnam Dong). However, after the Contractor had completed the construction and civil works in accordance with the provisions of the Contract. the Employer unilateral fixed the Contract Value. The Contractor emphasizes that the Estimated cost Revising of the Employer after the Employer unilateral fixed signing of Contract is not related to the Contractor and in case that The The Contractor will a ym the next steps in Revised Conwact Val and pe accordance with the provisions of the Conirset. Page 23“ni Hanoi, date on 21" February 2018 Tham chiéu s5: HNP6-18-0002 Hai N6i, ngdy 21 théng 02 ndm 2018 Nha thau khiing dink ta cin ett Hop ding xdy lap s6 110312.01/VIDIFI-GS, Chi dd te aa chdp thudn H6 so dé xudt ca Nha thaw va Gié triing chi dinh thd lev 2.773.000.000.000 VND (Bang chit: Hai nghin bay trém bay mucsi ba ty déng chan). Tuy nhién, sau khi Nha thé d@ hodn thanh vigc thi cOng va hoan thinh Céng trinh theo ding ede quy dinh cia Hop dang thi Chui dw te lai diéu chinh gidm gid tri Hop ding. Nhé théu xin nhén manh ring. viée diéu chinh de todn cia Chit hop Chi aéu nu don phuong diéu chink gidm gid tri Hop déng, Nha thdu thong déng y va du ne saw khi Hop ding aa duoc by két khong lién quan dén Nha thd va néu trong ruins tnec hién ede bude ké tiép theo diing quy dinh cia Hop ding. Project Manager of Gidm doc die dn Hanoi Haiphong Expressway Package EX-6 Dudng 6 16 cao toc Ha N6i Hai Phong ~ Goi thau EX -6 GS Engineering & Construction Corp. Attachment (Dinh kém): None / Khéng.GS Project Management Office of Hanol-Hai Phong Expressway Package EX GS Esc Watho mans? acim erm Our Ref. No.: HNP6-18-0003 Hanoi, date on 7" March 2018 Tham chiéu sé: HNP6-18-0003 Ha NGi, ngay 07 théng 03 ndim 2018 Attention : VIETNAM INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT AND FINACE INVESTMENT JSC. Kinh gic : TONG CONG TY PHAT TRIEN HA TANG VA DAU TU'TAI CHINH VIET NAM Attention: Mr. Dang Van Tam — Deputy General Director of VIDIFI Kinh git : Ong. Dang Van Tam — Phd Téng Gidm déc VIDIFI Attention. : Mr. Pham Anh Phong — Director of Project Management Board Kinh gi: Ong. Phgm Anh Phong- Giém déc Ban quan Ij de én eeton Mr Nghiém Xuan Hing — Acting Project Director of MI-VJEC JO. Ong Nghiém Xuan Hing — Ouyén gidm déc due dn lién danh TVGS MI-VJEC : Reply the Employer’s letter regarding to deduction of contract value according to the revised cost estimation under conclusions of the Inspector of Ministry of, Construction and the State Audit for Package EX6, Hanoi - HaiPhon; Expressway Project. oe Tra Idi the cia Chit ddu te vé viée diéu chinh gidm gid tri hop déng theo die todn diéu chinh theo két ludn ctia Thanh tra B6 Xay dung va Kiém tocn Nha mede lién quan dén géi thu EX6, Due dn duang 6 t6 cao téc Ha Noi - Hai Phong. pear Sin/Thisa ng Pursuant to Civil Work Contract No. 110312.01/ VIDIFI-GS signed by and between Vietnam Infrastructure Development and Finance Investment Joint Stock Company (the Employer) and GS Engineering & Construction Corporation (the Contractor) on the construction of Package EX-6 (the 773.000.000.000 VND ( in words: Two thousand seven hundred Contract);The contract value is and seventy three billion Vietnam Dong). Currently The Contractor has completed the construction and civil works in accordance with the provisions of the Contract, Can ctr Hop ding xdy lp sé 110312.01/VIDIFI-GS giita Téng céng ty Phét wrién Ha tang va Déu tu tai chinh Viet Nam (Chit déu te) voi Tap doan Xay dung var Ky thudt GS (Nha thdu) vé viée thi cong Géi théu EX-6 (Hop déng), Gid tri hop déng goi thau EX6 la: 2.773.000.000.000 VND (Bang chit: Hai nghin bay trim bay muoi ba t} déng chén). Hign nay Nha théu da hodn thanh viée thi cong vit hoan thanh Cong trink theo diing cde quy dinh cia Hop déng. ‘On date 05/03/2018, the Contractor received the VIDIFI’s official letters No 180222.02/TCT- PMB HNHP issued date 22/02/2018 and No 180226.01/TCT-PMB HNHP issued date 26/02/2018 via email (The Contractor has not received yet the original letter) regarding “Deduction of contract value according to the revised cost estimation under conclusions of the Inspector of MOC and the Page 1/3,GS Project Management Office of Hanol-Hai Phong Expressway Package EX G S E &C ‘Vinh Linh Hamlet, Thanh Cuong Commune, Thanh Ha District, Hai Duong Province Tel (84-320) 3816066-7 Fax (84-320) 3816068 Our Ref. No.: HNP6-18-0003 Hanoi, date on 7 March 2018 Tham chiéu sé: HNP6-18-0003 Ha N6i, ngay 07 théing 03 nam 2018 State Audit for Package EX6, Hanoi ~ Hai Phong Expressway Project. The Contractor would like to have comments as below: Ngay 05/03/2018, Nha thdu nhén dirge cing vian cia Chui dau tw sé 180222.02/TCT-PMB HNHP dé ngay 22/02/2018 va cong van sd 180226.01/TCT-PMB HNHP dé ngay 26/02/2018 qua sc “Diéu chinh gidm gid tri ‘the dign tie (Nha théu vén chuea nhén duoc ban gée cong van nay) hop ding theo dw todn diéu chinh theo két ludn ctia Thanh tra B6 Xdy dung va Kiém todn Nhét muse - Hai Phing”. Nha thu xin c6 ¥ kién lién quan dén goi thdu EX6, Die dn dung 6 16 cao toc Ha) in dé nay nhwe sau: 1. In official letter No 180226.01/TCT-PMB HNHP, the Contractor disagrees with the Employer's unilateral determination of the Revised contract value as USD 34,789,049 and VND 2,025,101,393,195 based on Sub-clause 70.2-PA (Conditions of Particular Application because the Contractor finds that the Employer is using this Clause incorrectly. Tai céng vin sé 180226.01/TCT-PMB HNHP, Nha thdu khéng déng y vi viée Cini déu te don phuong dn dinh gid tri Hop déng diéu chinh la 34.789.049 USD va 2.025.101.393.195 VND céin ete Diéu 70.2 DKCT (Diéu kién cu thé cia Hop déng) vi Nha thau thdy ring Chit déiu tw dang van dung diéu khodn nay chia ding. 2. The Contractors only received the above letter from the VIDIFI on date 05/03/2018 via email, while the issued date of this letter on 26/02/2018 with content: “VIDIFI kindly request the Contractor EX-6 to sign the revised Contract Addendum with the aforesaid value, and also request to the Contractor have to respond to Employer by 28/02/2018”. The Contractor can not accept the backdated official letter of the Employer and put the Contractor into the passive position in replying to this official letter. Therefore, the Contractor shall request to the VIDIFI to fill exactly the date of issuance letter and send it to the Contractor in the most timely manner in order to avoid the miss transaction information of the Both parties. Nha thdu chi nhdn duoc céng van trén ctia Chui ddu te vio ngéy 05/03/2018 qua the dign tie, trong khi céng vin dé ngay 26/02/2018 véi noi dung: “VIDIFI yéu cdu Nha thau EX-6 kj phy luc hop déng diéu chinh gid tri Hop déng voi gid tri niue trén va yeu cdu Nha thau phai 6 céng vain phan héi vao ngdy 28/02/2018". Nha thdu khéng thé chép nhén viée giti cong van da lini ngay cia Chi déu te va diva Nhat thdu vao thé bi déng trong viée chem tré tré loi céng van dé. Do dé, Nha thdu dé nghi Cini déu ne dién cing ngay phdt hanh cita céng van va giti cho Nha thdu kip thoi nhat dé trénh le théng tin giao dich cia hai bén. 3. Revising estimation cost in Detail Design stage according with requesting of the Inspector and State Audit, we understood that it is the responsibility of the Employer. However, Page 2/3Our Ref. No.: HNP6-18-0003 Tham chiéu sé: HNP6-18-0003 GS Project Management Office of Hano-Hai Phong Expressway Package EX-6 ‘Vinh Linh Hamlet, Thanh Cuong Commune, Thanh a District. Hat Don Province GSE«c ret ae ere Hanoi, date on 7 March 2018 Ha Noi, ngay 07 théng 03 ndim 2018 4, this adjustment directly affects to the proceedings of the Final Account stage of Package EX-6 and besides, there are some dispute matters in Package EX6 was outstanding and not yet settled down thoroughly. Therefore you are strongly requested to arrange the meeting with concerned parties such as VIDIFI’s leader and other units, TEDI consultant, MI-VJEC Engineer and the Contractor GS in order to clarify every dispute matters as soon as possible. ctia Thanh tra va Kiém Vige diéu chinh Dye todn giai dogn Thiét ké ky thudt theo yeu todn, ching t6i hiéu réing d6 Ia wrdch nhiém ctia Cini du tw. Tuy nhién, viée diéu chinh nay anh Ineong true tiép dén qué trinh Quyét todn géi thu EX-6 va bén canh dé tai Géi thau EX-6 mé6t so van dé tranh chdp cén ton dong va cha duge gidi quyét triét dé. Do 6, Nha théu kién nghj Chui déu te khan trong t6 chite cugc hop voi tat ca cde bén lién quan nlue Lanh dao VIDIFI va cde phéng ban; Tw van TEDI, Lién danh te van giém sét MI-VJEC va Nha thdu GS dé lam séng t6 céc vdn dé tranh chdp. The Contractor emphasizes that, in case if the Employer unilateral fixed the reducing of Revised Contract Value, the Contractor will not agree and perform the next steps in accordance with the provisions of the Contract. Nha thau xin nhén manh rang, néu trong truéng hop Chi déu tw don phwong diéu chink gidm gid tri Hop dong, Nha thdu khéng dong y va sé thuc hign cde bude ké tiép theo ding quy dinh cia Hop déng. Your kind understanding would be appreciated. Nha Thdu dtinh gié cao swe thdu hiéu ctia Chit Very truly yours, Project Manager of Gidm doc du dn Hanoi -Haiphong Expressway Package EX-6 Duong 6 16 cao toc Ha Noi Hai Phong — Goi thau EX -6 GS Engineering & Construction Corp. Attachment (Binh kém): None / Khong. Page 3/3, RY