You are on page 1of 1
20666159. aks v. fovince_of Tarlac Tne criginal omers of the subsect lands wes debater! —so_the_muricipalily 6f Tarlac wth the condition that if —be-used_absdutelyy and exclusively forthe greg, of _| —B_central_school_and public wales wihy C msidhs tore —_| ~Accephed —sech_donation 0 years afler the on inal | |_ewhers sold 4he_subsect land 6 the petitioner. Lader ep the_ rights to The popecty were ansfercecl by she municipal iy_| | oF Tarlac 6. the_frovince_of Tarlac the pelihoney Sled” Complaint seeking 40_anrul the donation. attesting that the condilicn mas nod ffflled — — — WEN Jthe conddion. to_erect 15 a Cendilion precedent - Rating oo ae : — 6 Ne The characteristic of 8 condition preceden) is-hat The. acquisition cf she rig is nel_effeted while, Sad_cadittan _1s_not Soiephecl wilh. Inthe case at ter the condition that a pblic_sches!| ard a public park should be erected! could rot he_ complied with except upsn afer giving effec! 4o the dorehon meaning the none compliance of She then_tunrcipalty of Tatlac mn) have been grounds +0 bevcke the donatisr However the acho is already barred due fo Prescpiphon Scanned with CamScanner

You might also like