Hindawi

Journal of Function Spaces

Volume 2022, Article ID 1652888, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1652888

Research Article
Some Midpoint Inequalities for η-Convex Function via
Weighted Fractional Integrals

Lei Chen,1 Waqas Nazeer ,2 Farman Ali ,3 Thongchai Botmart ,4 and Sarah Mehfooz5
1
College of Science, Qiongtai Normal University, Haikou, Hainan 571127, China
2
Department of Mathematics, Government College University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
3
Department of Software, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
4
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
5
Department of Mathematics, University of Okara, Okara, Pakistan

Correspondence should be addressed to Thongchai Botmart; thongbo@kku.ac.th

Received 22 September 2021; Revised 8 November 2021; Accepted 24 November 2021; Published 12 January 2022

Academic Editor: Emanuel Guariglia

Copyright © 2022 Lei Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

In this research, by using a weighted fractional integral, we establish a midpoint version of Hermite-Hadamrad Fejér type
inequality for η-convex function on a specific interval. To confirm the validity, we considered some special cases of our
results and relate them with already existing results. It can be observed that several existing results are special cases of our
presented results.

1. Introduction In the literature, we can notice that Hermite-Hadamarad

In the last few decades, the classical convexity has a rapid
development in fractional calculus [1]. We can say that
convexity plays a vital role in fractional integral inequalities
because of its geometric features [2–4].
Take a function f :I ⟶ ℝ be a continuous function.
Then, this function is called convex if
f ðtm + ð1 − t ÞnÞ ≤ tf ðmÞ + ð1 − t Þ f ðnÞ,
∀m, n ∈ I, and t ∈ ½0, 1:
There are many integral inequalities in the literature and
one of the most common inequality is Hermite-Hadamarad
or, shortly, the HH integral inequality, which is introduced
by [5]:
ðn
f ðm + n/2Þ ≤ 1/n − m f ðxÞdx ≤ f ðmÞ + f ðnÞ/2, m < n ∈ I:
m Definition 2. [18] Let f is positive convex function, continu-
inequality (2) has been applied to distinct convexities like
exponential convexity [6, 7], s-convexity [8], quasiconvexity
[9, 10], GA-convexity [11], ðα, mÞ-convexity [12], MT-
convexity [13], and also, other types of convexity (see
[14, 15]). Different forms of fractional integrals like
Riemann-Liouville (RL), Caputo Fabrizio, Hadamrad, Riesz,
Prabhakar, Ψ-RL, and weighted integrals [16–20] have been
established. A lot of integer-order integral inequalities like
Simpson [21], Ostrowski [22], Rozanova [23], Gagliardo-
ð1Þ Nirenberg [24], Olsen [25], Hardy [26], Opial [27, 28], and
Akdemir et al. [29, 30] have been developed and generalized
from fractional point of view.
Definition 1. Let I ⊂ ℝ be an interval and f : I ⟶ ℝ be a
continuous function. Then, the function f is called η-con-
vex if
f ðtm + ð1 − t ÞnÞ ≤ f ðnÞ + tηð f ðmÞ, f ðnÞÞ: ð3Þ
ð2Þ ous on closed interval ½m, n and x ∈ ½m, n when f ðxÞ ∈ L1
2 Journal of Function Spaces

½m, n with m < n, where left- and right-side RL fractional (ii) For v > 0, we have
integrals are defined by
  
ðx ϕ−1 ðmþnÞ=2þ I ðgoϕÞ ϕ−1 ðnÞ
v:ϕ

1   
RL v
I m+ f ðxÞ = ðx − t Þv−1 f ðt Þdt, = I ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ−ðgoϕÞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ
v:ϕ
Γ ðv Þ m
ðn ð4Þ 1   −1  ð8Þ
1
ϕ−1 ðmþnÞ=2þ I ðgoϕÞ ϕ ðnÞ
v:ϕ
RL v
I n− f ðxÞ = ðt − x Þ v−1
f ðt Þdt, =
Γ ðv Þ 2
 
x i
= I ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ−ðgoϕÞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ :
v:ϕ

where Γ is famous Gamma function and for any positive

integer n,ΓðnÞ = ðn − 1Þ!:

Definition 3 (see [19]). Let ½m, n ⊆ ℝ, f : ½m, n ⟶ ℝ and 2. Main Results

ϕ : ðm, n ⟶ ℝ be monotonically increasing positive func-
tion with a continuous derivative ϕ ′ ðxÞ on ðm, nÞ: Then, Theorem 6. Let 0 ≤ m < n and f : ½m, n ⟶ ℝ be an L1 η
the left-sided and the right-sided weighted fractional inte- -convex function and g : ½m, n ⟶ ℝ be an integrable, posi-
grals of f according to ϕ on ½m, n are defined by: tive and weighted symmetric function with respect to ðm + n
Þ/2. If, in addition, ϕ is an increasing and positive function
  ð from ½m, n onto itself such that its derivative ϕ ′ ðxÞ is con-
v ,ϕ ½gðxÞ−1 x tinues on ðm, nÞ, then for v > 0, the following inequalities
I f ðx Þ = ϕ ′ ðt ÞðϕðxÞ − ϕðt ÞÞv−1 f ðt ÞgðtÞdt,
mþ g
ΓðvÞ m are valid:
  ð
v ,ϕ ½gðxÞ−1 n
I f ðx Þ = ϕ ′ ðt ÞðϕðxÞ − ϕðt ÞÞv−1 f ðt Þgðt Þdt, v > 0: m + n h  
nþ g
ΓðvÞ x
f × ϕϕ−1ððmþnÞ=2Þþ I v:ϕ ðgoϕÞ ϕ−1 ðnÞ
ð5Þ 2   i
+ I ϕϕ−1 m+n ðgoϕÞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ
v:ϕ
ðð Þ/2Þ−
h   
In this research, we denote ½gðxÞ−1 = 1/gðxÞ and the ≤ gðnÞ ϕ−1 ðmþn=2Þþ I v:ϕ ϕ −1
ð f oϕÞ ð nÞ
inverse of function ϕðxÞ by ϕ−1 ðxÞ.  
goϕ
  
η t 2−t 2−t t
+ gðmÞ f m+ n ,f m+ n
Remark 4. From Definition 3, we can see some special cases: 2 2 2 2 2
 −1 i
(i) If ϕðxÞ = x and gðxÞ = 1, then weighted fractional  ϕ ðmÞ :
integrals [14] deduce to the classical RL fractional    η
integrals [9]. ≤ gðnÞ ϕ−1 ðmþn=2Þþ I v:ϕ goϕ
ð f oϕ Þ ϕ−1 ðnÞ + gðmÞ
2
(ii) If gðxÞ=1, we get fractional integrals of function f     

t 2−t 2−t t  −1 
with respect to function ϕðxÞ, which is defined by  f m+ n ,f m+ n ϕ ðmÞ :
2 2 2 2
[16, 17]:
ð9Þ
ðx
  1
mþ I
v:ϕ
f ðxÞ = ϕ ′ ðt ÞðϕðxÞ − ϕðt ÞÞv−1 f ðt Þdt, Proof. The η-convexity of f on ½m, n, for all x, y ∈ ½m, n
ΓðvÞ m
ðn gives
 v:ϕ  1
n+ I f ðxÞ = ϕ ′ ðt ÞðϕðxÞ − ϕðt ÞÞv−1 f ðt Þdt, v > 0:
ΓðvÞ x x + y  f ðyÞ + ηð f ðxÞ, f ðyÞÞ
ð6Þ f ≤ , ð10Þ
2 2

setting x = ðt/2Þm + ðð2 − tÞ/2Þn and y = ðð2 − tÞ/2Þm +

Lemma 5. [31] Assume that g : ½m, n ⟶ ð0,∞Þ is integra- ðt/2Þn
ble function and symmetric with respect to ðm + nÞ/2, m < n.
Then,
m + n  
2−t t
2f ≤f m+ n
(i) For each t ∈ ½0, 1, we have 2 2 2
    
t 2−t 2−t t
    +η f m+ n ,f m+ n :
t 2−t 2−t t 2 2 2 2
g m+ n =g m+ n : ð7Þ
2 2 2 2 ð11Þ
Journal of Function Spaces 3

Multiplying both sides of inequality (11) by t v−1 gððt/  ðϕðxÞ − mÞv−1 ð f oϕÞðxÞðgoϕÞðxÞϕ ′ ðxÞdx
2Þm + ðð2 − tÞ/2ÞnÞ and integrating over ½0, 1, we get
ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ  
m + nð 1   ðn − mÞv 2ðn − ϕðxÞÞ v−1
t 2−t =
2 v Γ ðv Þ n−m
2f t v−1 g m + n dt ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ
2 0 2 2
ð1    
t 2−t 2−t t  ð f oϕÞðxÞðgoϕÞðxÞϕ ′ ðxÞ
2dx
≤ t v−1 g m + n f m + n dt n−m
2 2 2 2
0
ð1   ð12Þ ð ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ  
t 2−t ðn − mÞv 2ðϕðxÞ − mÞ v−1
+ ηt v−1 g m + n +
0 2 2 2v ΓðvÞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ n−m
    
t 2−t 2−t t
 f m+ n ,f m+ n : 2dx
2 2 2 2  ð f oϕÞðxÞðgoϕÞðxÞϕ ′ ðxÞ , ð15Þ
n−m
From the left side of inequality (12), we use
where
2v−1
Γ ðv Þ h   
−1 I v:ϕ ðgoϕÞ ϕ−1 ðnÞ   −1
ðn − mÞv ϕ ðmþn=2Þþ ðgoϕÞ ϕ−1 ðyÞ =
1
 −1  =
1
, ð16Þ
  i ðgoϕÞ ϕ ðyÞ gðyÞ
+ I ϕϕ−1 m+n ðgoϕÞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ
v:ϕ
ðð Þ/2Þ−

2 v Γ ðv Þ  
−1  for y = m, n:
v ϕϕ−1ððmþnÞ=2Þþ I ðgoϕÞ ϕ ðnÞ
v:ϕ
=
ð n − m Þ Setting u1 = 2ðn − ϕðxÞÞ/ðn − mÞ and u2 = 2ðϕðxÞ − mÞ/
v ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ ðn − mÞ, one can deduce that
2
= ðn − ϕðxÞÞv−1 ðgoϕÞðxÞϕ ′ ðxÞdx
ðn − mÞv ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ  
ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ   gðnÞ v:ϕ
ϕ−1 ðnÞ
ϕ−1 ðmþn=2Þþ I goϕ ð f oϕÞ
2ðn − ϕðxÞÞ v−1 2dx  
= ðgoϕÞðxÞϕ ′ ðxÞ 
+ gðmÞ goϕ I ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ− ð f oϕÞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ
v:ϕ
−1
ϕ ððm+nÞ/2Þ n − m n −m
ð1   ð  
t 2−t ðn − mÞv 1 v−1 u1 2 − u1
= t v−1 g m + n dt, = v u1 f m+ n
0 2 2 2 Γ ðv Þ 0 2 2
 
ð13Þ u1 2 − u1
g m+ n du1
2 2
where t = 2ðn − ϕðxÞÞ/ðn − mÞ. It follows that ð1    

2 − u2 u2 2 − u2 u2
 + uv−1 f m + n g m + n du2
m + n ð 1 t 2−t 0
2
2 2 2 2
2f t g m+ v−1
n dt ð    
2 0 2 2 ðn − mÞv 1 v−1 t 2−t t 2−t
= v t f m+ n g m+ n dt
2v ΓðvÞ m + n h   2 Γ ðv Þ 0 2 2 2 2
= vf × ϕϕ−1ððmþnÞ=2Þþ I v:ϕ ðgoϕÞ ϕ−1 ðnÞ ð1    

ðn − mÞ 2 2−t t t 2−t
  i + t v−1 f m+ n g m+ n dt ,
2 2 2 2
+ I ϕϕ−1 m+n ðgoϕÞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ :
v:ϕ 0
ðð Þ/2Þ−
ð17Þ
ð14Þ
ð1    
By evaluating the weighted fractional operators, we t 2−t t 2−t
t v−1 f m+ n g m+ n dt
see that 0 2 2 2 2
ð1  
  t 2−t
  + ηt v−1 g m + n
gðnÞ ϕϕ−1ððmþnÞ=2Þþ I
v:ϕ
ð f oϕÞ ϕ−1 ðnÞ 0 2 2
goϕ     
  t 2−t 2−t t
   f m+ n ,f m+ n
+ gðmÞ v:ϕ
goϕ I ϕ −1 ð f oϕÞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ 2 2 2 2
ϕ ððm+nÞ/2Þ−
2 Γ ðv Þ
v h   
−1  −1  ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ −1
v gðnÞ ϕ−1 ðmþn=2Þþ I goϕ ð f oϕÞ ϕ ðnÞ
v:ϕ
ðgoϕÞ ϕ ðnÞ =
= gðnÞ ðn − ϕðxÞÞv−1 ðn − m Þ
Γ ðv Þ     
ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ t 2−t 2−t t
+ ηgðmÞ f m+ n ,f m+ n
 ð f oϕÞðxÞðgoϕÞðxÞϕ ′ ðxÞdx 2 2 2 2
  ð −1  −1 i
ðgoϕÞ−1 ϕ−1 ðnÞ ϕ ððm+nÞ/2Þ  ϕ ðmÞ :
+ gðmÞ
Γ ðv Þ ϕ−1 ðmÞ ð18Þ
4 Journal of Function Spaces

By using (14) and (18) in (12), we get h   

≤ gðnÞ ϕ−1 ðmþn=2Þþ I v:ϕ
goϕ
ð f oϕÞ ϕ−1 ðnÞ
m + n h        
f × ϕϕ−1ððmþnÞ=2Þþ I v:ϕ ðgoϕÞ ϕ−1 ðnÞ η t 2−t 2−t t
2  + gðmÞ f m+ n ,f m+ n
 i 2 2 2 2 2
+ I ϕϕ−1 m+n ðgoϕÞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ i
v:ϕ
 −1
h 
ðð Þ/2Þ−
   ϕ ðmÞ : ð22Þ
−1
≤ gðnÞ ϕ−1 ðmþn=2Þþ I v:ϕgoϕ
ð f oϕ Þ ϕ ð n Þ
     This completes our proof.
t 2−t 2−t t
+ ηtgðmÞ f m+ n ,f m+ n
2 2 2 2
 −1  i Remark 7. From Theorem 6, we can get following special
 ϕ ðmÞ : case:
If ϕðxÞ = x, then inequality (9) becomes
ð19Þ
m + nh v
i
RL RL v
The left side of Theorem 6 is completed.
f ðmþn=2Þþ I gðnÞ + I ððm+nÞ/2Þ− gðmÞ
2  
Now, we will prove right side of inequality (9) by using v η v 
≤ gðnÞ RL
ðnÞ + gðmÞ RL
ðmþn=2Þþ I g f I f ðmÞ
η-convexity. g ððm+nÞ/2Þ−
    2 
       η t 2−t 2−t t
2−t t t 2−t 2−t t + f m+ n ,f m+ n
f m + n + tη f m+ n ,f m+ n 2 2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2 2 2  v
 η RL v 
2−t ≤ gðnÞ ðmþn=2Þþ I g f ðnÞ + gðmÞ g I m+n
RL
f ðmÞ
ðð Þ/2Þ−
≤ f ðnÞ + ηð f ðmÞ, f ðnÞÞ     2 
 2    η t 2−t 2−t t
t 2−t 2−t t + f m+ n ,f m+ n :
+η f m+ n ,f m+ n : 2 2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2
ð23Þ
ð20Þ
Lemma 8. [31] Let 0 ≤ m < n and f : ½m, n ⟶ ℝ be a con-
Multiply Equation (20) by t v−1 gððt/2Þm + ðð2 − tÞ/2ÞnÞ tinuous with a derivative f ′ ∈L1 ½m, n such that f ðxÞ = f ðmÞ
and integrate over ½0, 1 leads us to Ð
+ xm f ′ ðtÞdt and let g : ½m, n ⟶ ℝ be an integrable, posi-
ð 1     tive, and weighted symmetric function with respect to ðm +
t 2−t t 2−t
t v−1 f
m+ n g m+ n dt nÞ/2. If ϕ is a continuous increasing mapping form the inter-
2 2 2 2
0
ð1    
val ½m, n onto itself with a derivative ϕ ′ ðxÞ which is contin-
2 − t t t 2−t uous on ðm, nÞ, then for v > 0, the following equality is valid:
+ t v−1 f m+ n g m+ n dt :
2 2 2 2 m + nh
0  
2−t f −1 I v:ϕ ðgoϕÞ ϕ−1 ðnÞ
≤ f ðnÞ + ηð f ðmÞ, f ðnÞÞ 2  ϕ ðmþn=2Þþ 
2 i
    
+ I ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ− ðgoϕÞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ
v:ϕ
t 2−t 2−t t
+η f m+ n ,f m+ n : h   
2

2

2 2 − gðnÞ ϕ−1 ðmþn=2Þþ I v:ϕ ð f oϕ Þ ϕ−1 ðnÞ
ð1 goϕ
t
× t v−1 g m +
2−t   i
n dt: + gðmÞ goϕ I ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ− ð f oϕÞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ
v:ϕ
0 2 2
ð −1
ð21Þ 1 ϕ ððm+nÞ/2Þ
=
ΓðvÞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ
By using (7) and (14) in (21), we get "ð # ð24Þ
t
    ϕ ′ ðxÞðϕðxÞ − mÞ ðgoϕÞðxÞdx
v−1
gðnÞ ϕ−1 ðmþn=2Þþ I v:ϕ
goϕ
ð f oϕÞ ϕ−1 ðnÞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ
       ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ
t 2−t 2−t t 1
+ ηtgðmÞ f m+ n ,f m+ n  f ′ oϕ ðt Þϕ ′ ðt Þdt −
2 2 2 2 Γ ðv Þ ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ
 −1  "ð #
 ϕ ðmÞ −1
ϕ ðnÞ
h     ϕ ′ ðxÞðn − ϕðxÞÞ v−1
ðgoϕÞðxÞdx
−1
≤ gðnÞ ϕ−1 ðmþn=2Þþ I v:ϕ ð f oϕ Þ ϕ ð n Þ t
 
goϕ
    
η t 2−t 2−t t  f ′ oϕ ðt Þϕ ′ ðt Þdt:
+ g ðm Þ f m+ n ,f m+ n
2 2 2 2 2
 −1 i Remark 9. From Lemma 8, we obtain the following special
 ϕ ðmÞ :
case:
Journal of Function Spaces 5

If ϕðxÞ = x, then equality (24) becomes Proof. By using Lemma 8 and properties of modulus, we get
m + nh i 
f RL v Rl v
ðmþnÞ=2þ I gðnÞ + I ðm+nÞ/2− gðmÞ
 1 ð ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ
2 h 
   v  i jσ1 + σ2 j = 
v ΓðvÞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ
− gðnÞ RL RL
ðmþnÞ=2þ I g f ðnÞ + gðmÞ g I ðm+nÞ/2− f ðmÞ "ð #
ð ð
t
1 ðm+nÞ/2 t  ϕ ′ ðxÞðϕðxÞ − mÞ ðgoϕÞðxÞdx
v−1
= ðx − mÞv−1 gðxÞdx f ′ ðt Þdt
ΓðvÞ m m
ϕ−1 ðmÞ
ð ðn
  ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ
1 n 1
− ðn − xÞv−1 gðxÞdx f ′ ðt Þdt:  f ′ oϕ ðt Þϕ ′ ðt Þdt +
ΓðvÞ ðm+nÞ/2 t Γ ðv Þ ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ
"ð #
ð25Þ −1
ϕ ðnÞ
 ϕ ′ ðxÞðn − ϕðxÞÞ v−1
ðgoϕÞðxÞdx
Theorem 10. Let 0 ≤ m < n and f : ½m, n ⊆ ½0,∞Þ ⟶ ℝ be t

a differentiable function on the interval ½m, n such that f ðxÞ   
Ð 
= f ðmÞ + xm f ′ ðtÞdt and let g : ½m, n ⟶ ℝ be an integrable,  f ′ oϕ ðt Þϕ ′ ðt Þdt 

positive, and weighted symmetric function with respect to ð ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ
ðm + nÞ/2. If, in addition, jf ′ j is convex on ½m, n, and ϕ ≤
1
is an increasing and positive function from ½m, nÞ onto itself ΓðvÞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ
such that its derivative ϕ ′ ðxÞ is continuous on ðm, nÞ, then ð 
 t 
 
for v > 0, the following inequalities hold:  ϕ ′ ðxÞðϕðxÞ − mÞ ðgoϕÞðxÞdx
v−1
  ϕ−1 ðmÞ 
 1 ð ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ
    ð −1
∣σ1 + σ2 ∣ =    1 ϕ ðnÞ
ΓðvÞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ   f ′ oϕ ðt Þϕ ′ ðt Þdt +
"ð # ΓðvÞ ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ
t ð −1 
 ϕ ′ ðxÞðϕðxÞ − mÞ ðgoϕÞðxÞdx
v−1  ϕ ðnÞ 
 
ϕ−1 ðmÞ  ϕ ′ ðxÞðn − ϕðxÞÞ ðgoϕÞðxÞdx
v−1
 t 
  ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ   
1  
 f ′ oϕ ðt Þϕ ′ ðt Þdt −   f ′ oϕ ðt Þϕ ′ ðt Þdt:
Γ ðv Þ ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ
"ð # ð27Þ
ϕ−1 ðnÞ
 ϕ ′ ðxÞðn − ϕðxÞÞ v−1
ðgoϕÞðxÞdx
t Since jf ′ j is η-convex on ½m, n for t ∈ ½ϕ−1 ðmÞ, ϕ−1 ðnÞ,

   so

 f ′ oϕ ðt Þϕ ′ ðt Þdt 
     n − ϕðt Þ ϕðt Þ − m 

 ′   ′
 f oϕ ðt Þ =  f m+ n 
ðn − mÞv+1 n−m n−m
≤ ð28Þ
ΓðvÞ2v+1 ðv + 1Þ n − ϕ ðt Þ  
h i ≤ f ′ ðn Þ + η f ′ ðmÞ, f ′ ðnÞ :
n−m
 kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞ f ′ ðnÞ + kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞ f ′ ðnÞ

ðn − mÞv+1 So, using (28), we obtain

+ kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞ η
ΓðvÞ2v+2 ðv + 2Þ
 kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞ ð ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ
   jσ1 + σ1 j ≤
  f ′ ð m Þ ,  f ′ ð n Þ  ΓðvÞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ
ð 
ðn − mÞv+1  t 
 
+ kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞ η  ϕ ′ ðxÞðϕðxÞ − mÞ dxv−1
ΓðvÞ2v+2 ðv + 1Þðv + 2Þ  ϕ−1 ðmÞ 
   

  f ′ ð m Þ ,  f ′ ð n Þ    n − ϕ ðt Þ     
×  f ′ ð n Þ + η  f ′ ðmÞ,  f ′ ðnÞ
n−m
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞
≤2 f ′ ðn Þ kgk½ðm+nÞ/2,n,∞ ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ
ΓðvÞ2v+1 ðv + 1Þ  ϕ ′ ðt Þdt +
" # ΓðvÞ ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞ ðn − mÞv+1 ð −1 
+ +  ϕ ðnÞ 
ΓðvÞ2v+2 ðv + 1Þðv + 2Þ ΓðvÞ2v+2 ðv + 2Þ  
 ϕ ′ ðxÞðn − ϕðxÞÞ dx
v−1
     t 
 kgk½m,n,∞ η  f ′ ðmÞ,  f ′ ðnÞ :
  n − ϕ ðt Þ     


× f ðn Þ +′   ′ 
η f ðmÞ , f ðnÞ ′ 
ð26Þ n−m
6 Journal of Function Spaces

 ϕ ′ ðt Þdt Remark 11. From Theorem 10, we can get following

inequalities:
ðn − mÞv+1
≤
Γðv + 1Þ2v+1 (1) If ϕðxÞ = x, then inequality (26) becomes
h i
 kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞ f ′ ðnÞ + kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞ f ′ ðnÞ  m + nh i
 RL v RL v
f ðmþnÞ=2þ I gðnÞ+ I m+n/2− gðmÞ
ðn − m Þ v+1
2h  
+ kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞
Γðv + 3Þ2v+2 − gðnÞ RL
v
ðmþnÞ=2þ I g f ðnÞ
     v  i
 η  f ′ ðmÞ,  f ′ ðnÞ 
+ gðmÞ RL I
g m+n/2− f ð m Þ 
ðn − mÞv+1 ðn − mÞv+1
+ kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞ ≤
Γðv + 2Þ2v+2 ðv + 1Þ ΓðvÞ2v+1 ðv + 1Þ
    h i
 η  f ′ ð m Þ ,  f ′ ð n Þ   kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞ f ′ ðnÞ + kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞ f ′ ðnÞ
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞ ðn − mÞv+1
≤2 f ′ ðnÞ + kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞
Γðv + 1Þ2 v+1
ΓðvÞ2v+2 ðv + 2Þ
" #    
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞ ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞  η  f ′ ðmÞ,  f ′ ðnÞ
+ +
Γðv + 2Þ2v+2 ðv + 1Þ Γðv + 3Þ2v+2
ðn − mÞv+1
    + kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞
 η  f ′ ð m Þ ,  f ′ ð n Þ  , ð29Þ ΓðvÞ2v+2 ðv + 1Þðv + 2Þ
   
 η  f ′ ðmÞ,  f ′ ðnÞ
where
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞
ðt ≤2 f ′ ðn Þ
ΓðvÞ2v+1 ðv + 1Þ
ϕ ′ ðxÞðϕðxÞ − mÞ v−1
dx "
ϕ−1 ðmÞ ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞
ð ϕ ðt Þ − mÞ v +
= , ΓðvÞ2v+2 ðv + 1Þðv + 2Þ
v #
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞     
ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ + η  f ′ ð m Þ ,  f ′ ð n Þ  :
ϕ ′ ðxÞðn − ϕðxÞÞv−1 dx ΓðvÞ2v+2 ðv + 2Þ
t
ð31Þ
ð n − ϕ ð t ÞÞ v
= ,
v
ð ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ
(2) If ϕðxÞ = x and gðxÞ = 1, then inequality (26)
ðϕðt Þ − mÞv ðn − ϕðt ÞÞϕ ′ ðt Þdt becomes
ϕ−1 ðmÞ

ðn − mÞv+2 ðv + 3Þ  v−1
= , 2 Γðv + 1Þ
2v+2 ðv + 1Þðv + 2Þ ð30Þ 
 ð n − m Þv
ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ h i m + n
v
ðn − ϕðt ÞÞv ðn − ϕðt ÞÞϕ ′ ðt Þdt ðmþnÞ=2þ I f ðnÞ+ I m+n/2− f ðmÞ − f
 RL RL v
j
ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ 2
ðn − mÞv+2 ðn − m Þ v+1

= , ≤
2v+2 ðv + 2Þ ΓðvÞ2v+1 ðv + 1Þ
h i
ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ  kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞ f ′ ðnÞ + kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞ f ′ ðnÞ
ðn − ϕðt ÞÞv ϕ ′ ðt Þdt ðn − mÞv+1
ððm+nÞ/2Þ + kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞
ð ϕ−1 m+n/2 ΓðvÞ2v+2 ðv + 2Þ
   
= ðϕðt Þ − mÞv ϕ ′ ðt Þdt  η  f ′ ðmÞ,  f ′ ðnÞ
−1
ϕ ðmÞ

ðn − mÞv+1 ðn − mÞv+1
= : + kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞
2v+1 ðv + 1Þ ΓðvÞ2v+2 ðv + 1Þðv + 2Þ
   
 η  f ′ ðmÞ,  f ′ ðnÞ
This completes our proof.
Journal of Function Spaces 7

q
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞ Proof. Since jf ′ j is η-convex on ½m, n for t ∈ ½ϕ−1 ðmÞ,
≤2 f ′ ðn Þ ϕ−1 ðnÞ, so
ΓðvÞ2v+1 ðv + 1Þ
" #
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞ ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞   q  n − ϕðt Þ 
ϕðt Þ − m q
+ +  ′   ′
ΓðvÞ2v+2 ðv + 1Þðv + 2Þ ΓðvÞ2v+2 ðv + 2Þ  f oϕ ðt Þ =  f m+ n 
n−m n−m
     q n − ϕ ð t Þ   q  q 
 η  f ′ ð m Þ ,  f ′ ð n Þ  : ð32Þ ≤  f ′ ð n Þ + η  f ′ ðmÞ ,  f ′ ðnÞ :
n−m
ð35Þ

(3) If ϕðxÞ = x, gðxÞ = 1 and v = 1, then inequality (26)

becomes By using power mean integral, Lemma 8, and η-con-
q
 vexity of jf ′ j , we have
 1
ðn m + n
 f ð Þdx
x − f 
n − m 2  ð −1
m
1 ϕ ðm+n/2Þ
ðn − m Þ 2 jσ 1 + σ 2 j ≤
≤ f ′ ðn Þ ΓðvÞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ
ð 
"4 #  t



ðn − mÞ2 + 2ðn − mÞ2    
 



 ϕ−1 ðmÞ
ϕ ′ ðxÞðϕðxÞ − mÞv−1 ðgoϕÞðxÞdx

+ ′ ′
η f ðmÞ , f ðnÞ :
48   ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ
1
 f ′ oϕ ðt Þϕ ′ ðt Þdt +
ð33Þ ΓðvÞ ϕ−1 ðm+n/2Þ
ð −1 
 ϕ ðnÞ 
 
 ϕ ′ ðxÞðn − ϕðxÞÞ ðgoϕÞðxÞdx
v−1
 t 
 
Theorem 12. Let 0 ≤ m ≤ n and f : ½m, n ⊆ ½0,∞Þ ⟶ ℝ be  f ′ oϕ ðt Þϕ ′ ðt Þdt
a continuously differentiable function on the interval ½m, n ð ϕ−1 ðm+n/2Þ
Ð
such that f ðxÞ = f ðmÞ + xm f ′ ðtÞdt, and let g : ½m, m ⟶ ℝ ≤
1
ΓðvÞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ
be integrable, positive, and weighted symmetric function with
q ð  !1
respect to ðm + nÞ/2. If, in addition, j f ′ j is convex on ½m, n,  t 
 
q ≤ 1, and ϕ is increasing and positive function from ½m, n  ϕ ′ ðxÞðϕðxÞ − mÞ ðgoϕÞðxÞdxϕ ′ ðt Þdt
v−1
 ϕ−1 ðmÞ 
onto itself such that its derivative ϕ ′ ðxÞ is continuous on ð ϕ−1 ðm+n/2Þ
½m, m, then for v > 0, we have: −1/q ×
ϕ−1 ðmÞ
ð 
  t 
ðn − mÞv+1  1/q 
 
ϕ ′ ðxÞðϕðxÞ − mÞ ðgoϕÞðxÞdx
v−1
jσ1 + σ2 j ≤ k gk  f ′ ðnÞq  ϕ−1 ðmÞ 
½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞
Γðv + 1Þ2v+1+ð1/qÞ
 !1/q
q 1/q 

 q

+ kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞  f ′ ðnÞ   f ′ oϕ ðt Þ ϕ ′ ðt Þdt

ðn − mÞv+1 ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ

+ kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞ 1
Γðv + 3Þ2v+2+ð1/qÞ +
Γð v Þ
h  q  q i1/q
ϕ−1 ðm+n/2Þ
ð −1  !1−1/q
 η  f ′ ðmÞ ,  f ′ ðnÞ  ϕ ðnÞ 
 
 ϕ ′ ðxÞðn − ϕðxÞÞ ðgoϕÞðxÞdxϕ ′ ðt Þdt
v−1

ðn − mÞv+1  t 
+ kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞ ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ ð −1
 ϕ ðnÞ


Γðv + 2Þ2v+2+ð1/qÞ ðv + 1Þ1/q  
h   ϕ ′ ð Þð − ϕ v−1
ð ÞÞ ð Þð Þdx
q  q i1/q ×

x n x goϕ x

 η  f ′ ðmÞ ,  f ′ ðnÞ
−1
ϕ ðm+n/2Þ t
!1/q
  q
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞    1/q  
  f ′ oϕ ðt Þ ϕ ′ ðt Þdt
≤2  f ′ ðnÞq
v+1+ð1/qÞ
Γðv + 1Þ2
" kgk½m,m+n/2,∞
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞ ≤
+ ΓðvÞ
Γðv + 2Þ2v+2+ð1/qÞ ðv + 1Þ1/q ð ϕ−1 ðm+n/2Þ ð t 

!1−1/q
#  
  ϕ ′ ðxÞðϕðxÞ − mÞ dxϕ ′ ðt Þdt
v−1
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞      1/q ϕ−1 ðmÞ  ϕ−1 ðmÞ 
+ η  f ′ ðmÞ,  f ′ ðnÞ : 
ð ϕ−1 ðm+n/2Þ ð t 
Γðv + 3Þ2 v+2+ð1/qÞ   q
  
×  ϕ ′ ðxÞðϕðxÞ − mÞ dx f ′ oϕ ðt Þ
v−1

ð34Þ ϕ−1 ðmÞ  ϕ−1 ðmÞ 

8 Journal of Function Spaces

" #
kgk½m,m+n/2,∞ ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞ ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞
 ϕ ′ ðt ÞdtÞ1/q + + +
Γ ðv Þ Γðv + 2Þ2v+2+ð1/qÞ ðv + 1Þ1/q Γðv + 3Þ2v+2+ð1/qÞ
ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ ð −1  !1−1/q
 ϕ ðmÞ 
 
  ϕ ′ ðxÞðn − ϕðxÞÞ dxϕ ′ ðt Þdt
v−1     1/q
ϕ−1 ðm+n/2Þ  t   η  f ′ ð m Þ ,  f ′ ð n Þ  , ð36Þ
ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ ð −1 
 ϕ ðnÞ 
 
×  ϕ ′ ðxÞðn − ϕðxÞÞv−1 dx
−1
ϕ ðm+n/2Þ t   where
!1/q
  q
 ′  ′ ð ϕ−1 ðm+n/2Þ ð t 

  f oϕ ðt Þ ϕ ðt Þdt  
 ðϕðt Þ − mÞ ðn − ϕðt ÞÞϕ ′ ðt Þdt
v−1
ϕ−1 ðmÞ  ϕ−1 ðmÞ 
kgk½m,m+n/2,∞
≤ ðn − mÞv+2 ðv + 3Þ
Γ ðv Þ = ,
2v+2 ðv + 1Þðv + 2Þ
ð ϕ−1 m+n/2 ð t 

!1−1/q
ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ
ð37Þ
 
  ϕ ′ ðxÞðϕðxÞ − mÞ dxϕ ′ ðt Þdt
v−1
∣ ðn − ϕðt ÞÞv ðn − ϕðt ÞÞ∣ϕ ′ ðt Þdt
ϕ−1 ðmÞ  ϕ−1 ðmÞ  −1
ϕ ðm+n/2Þ t
"ð  
ϕ m+n/2 ð t
−1  ðn − mÞv+2
  = v+2 :
×  ϕ ′ ðxÞðϕðxÞ − mÞ dx
v−1
2 ðv + 2Þ
−1
ϕ ðmÞ  −1
ϕ ðmÞ 
 q n − ϕðt Þ   q  q 
×  f ′ ð n Þ + η  f ′ ð m Þ ,  f ′ ð n Þ 
n−m
Remark 13. From Theorem 12, we can get following special
#1/q
kgk½m,m+n/2,∞ cases:
′
 ϕ ðt Þdt +
Γ ðv Þ (1) If ϕðxÞ = x, then inequality (34) becomes
ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ ð −1  !1−1/q
 ϕ ðmÞ 
 
×  ϕ ′ ðxÞðn − ϕðxÞÞ dxϕ ′ ðt Þdt
v−1  m + nh

i
ϕ−1 ðm+n/2Þ  t  RL v RL v
f mþn=2þ I gðnÞ + I m+n/2− gðmÞ
"ð −1 ð −1  2
ϕ ðnÞ  ϕ ðnÞ  h    v  i
  − gðnÞ RL
v
ð Þ ð Þ RL
ð Þ 
×  ϕ ′ ðxÞðn − ϕðxÞÞv−1 dx I
mþn=2þ g f n + g m I
g m+n/2− f m 
−1
ϕ ðm+n/2Þ t  
ðn − mÞv+1   1/q
 q n − ϕðt Þ ≤ k g k  f ′ ðnÞq
×  f ′ ðnÞ + Γðv + 1Þ2v+1+ð1/qÞ ½ m , m+n/2  , ∞
n−m  q 1/q
#1/q + kgk  f ′ ðnÞ
 q  q  ð t Þ ½m,m+n/2,∞
 η  f ′ ðmÞ ,  f ′ ðnÞ ϕ′ dt ðn − mÞv+1
+ kgk½m,m+n/2,∞
Γðv + 3Þ2v+2+ð1/qÞ
ðn − mÞv+1   1/q h  q  q i1/q
= kg k  f ′ ðnÞq  η  f ′ ðmÞ ,  f ′ ðnÞ
½m,m+n/2,∞
Γðv + 1Þ2v+1+ð1/qÞ
  1/q ðn − mÞv+1
+ kgk  f ′ ðnÞq  kgk½m,m+n/2,∞
½m,m+n/2,∞ Γðv + 2Þ2v+2+ð1/qÞ ðv + 1Þð1/qÞ
h  q  q i1/q
ðn − mÞv+1  η  f ′ ðmÞ ,  f ′ ðnÞ
+ kgk½m,m+n/2,∞
Γðv + 3Þ2v+2+ð1/qÞ
h  ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞    1/q
q  q i1/q ≤2  f ′ ðnÞq
 η  f ′ ð m Þ ,  f ′ ð n Þ  Γðv + 1Þ2 v+1+ð1/qÞ
"
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞
ðn − mÞv+1 
+ kgk½m,m+n/2,∞ Γðv + 2Þ2v+2+ð1/qÞ ðv + 1Þð1/qÞ
Γðv + 2Þ2v+2+ð1/qÞ ðv + 1Þð1/qÞ #
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞
h  q  q i1/q +
 η  f ′ ð m Þ ,  f ′ ð n Þ  Γðv + 3Þ2v+2+ð1/qÞ
    1/q
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞    1/q  η  f ′ ðmÞ,  f ′ ðnÞ :
≤2  f ′ ð n Þq
v+1+ð1/qÞ
Γðv + 1Þ2 ð38Þ
Journal of Function Spaces 9

(2) If ϕðxÞ = x and gðxÞ = 1, then inequality (34) ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞    1/q
becomes ≤2  f ′ ð n Þ q
Γðv + 1Þ2v+1+ð2/qÞ
 v−1
2 Γðv + 1Þ " #
 ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞ ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞
 ðn − m Þv + +
h i m + n Γðv + 2Þ2v+2+ð2/qÞ ðpv + 1Þ1/p Γðv + 3Þ2v+2+ð2/qÞ
 RL
v RL v 
mþn=2þ I f ð Þ
n + I m+n/2− ð Þ − f
f m      1/q
2
 η  f ′ ð m Þ ,  f ′ ð n Þ  : ð41Þ
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞    1/q
≤2  f ′ ð n Þ q
v+1+ð1/qÞ
Γðv + 1Þ2 q
" Proof. Since j f ′ j is η-convex on ½m, n, for t ∈ ½ϕ−1 ðmÞ,
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞ ϕ−1 ðnÞ, we get
+
Γðv + 2Þ2v+2+ð1/qÞ ðv + 1Þ1/q
#   q  n − ϕðt Þ 
ϕðt Þ − m q
 ′   ′
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞      1/q  f oϕ ðt Þ =  f m+ n 
 η  f ′ ð m Þ ,  f ′ ð n Þ  : n−m n−m
Γðv + 3Þ2v+2+ð1/qÞ  q n − ϕ ð t Þ   q  q 
≤  f ′ ð n Þ + η  f ′ ðmÞ ,  f ′ ðnÞ :
ð39Þ n−m
ð42Þ
(3) If ϕðxÞ = x, gðxÞ = 1 and v = 1, then inequality (34)
becomes By using Hölder’s inequality, Lemma 8, η-convexity of
q
j f ′ j , and properties of modulus, we get
 ðn m + n
 1
 f ð x Þ dx − f  ð −1
n − m 2  1 ϕ ððm+nÞ/2Þ
m jσ1 + σ2 j ≤
ðn − mÞ2   q 1/q ΓðvÞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ
′ ð n Þ ð 
≤2 f  t 
22+ð1/qÞ  
# ð40Þ  ϕ ′ ðxÞðϕðxÞ − mÞ ðgoϕÞðxÞdx
v−1
 ϕ−1 ðmÞ 
ðn − mÞ2 + 21/q ðn − mÞ2 ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ
+   1
21/q 33+ð1/qÞ  f ′ oϕ ðt Þϕ ′ ðt Þdt +
  ΓðvÞ ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ
  1/q ð −1 
 η  f ′ ð m Þ ,  f ′ ð n Þ  :  ϕ ðn Þ



 ϕ ′ ðxÞðn − ϕðxÞÞv−1 ðgoϕÞðxÞdx
 t 
 
 f ′ oϕ ðt Þϕ ′ ðt Þdt
Theorem 14. Let 0 ≤ m ≤ n and f : ½m, n ⊆ ½0,∞Þ ⟶ ℝ be ð ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ
1
a continuously differentiable function on the interval ½m, n ≤
Ð ΓðvÞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ
such that f ðxÞ = f ðmÞ + xm f ′ ðtÞdt, and let g : ½m, m ⟶ ℝ ð p !1/p
 t 
be integrable, positive and weighted symmetric function with  
 ϕ ′ ðxÞðϕðxÞ − mÞ ðgoϕÞðxÞdx ϕ ′ ðt Þdt
v−1
q  ϕ−1 ðmÞ 
respect to ðm + nÞ/2. If, in addition, j f ′ j is convex on ½m, n,
ð ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ   !
q ≤ 1, and ϕ is increasing and positive function from ½m, n  q 1/q
 ′ 
onto itself such that its derivative ϕ ′ ðxÞ is continuous on ×  f oϕ ðt Þ ϕ ′ ðt Þdt
ϕ−1 ðmÞ
½m, m, then for v > 0, we have ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ
1
+
  1/q ΓðvÞ ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ
ðn − mÞv+1  f ′ ð n Þ q ð −1 p
jσ1 + σ2 j ≤ kg k ½ ð Þ/2 ∞  ϕ ðn Þ 
!1/p
Γðv + 1Þ2v+1+ð2/qÞ m , m+n ,
 
  ϕ ′ ðxÞðn − ϕðxÞÞ ðgoϕÞðxÞdx ϕ ′ ðt Þdt
v−1
 1/q  t 
+ kgk  f ′ ð n Þ q !
½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞ ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ   q 1/q
 ′ 
ðn − mÞv+1 ×  f oϕ ðt Þ ϕ ′ ðt Þdt
+ kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞ ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ
Γðv + 3Þ2v+2+ð2/qÞ kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞
h  q  q i1/q ≤
 η  f ′ ð m Þ ,  f ′ ð n Þ  Γð v Þ
ð ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ ð t p

!1/p
  ′
ðn − mÞv+1 ×  ′
ϕ ðxÞðϕðxÞ − mÞ dx ϕ ðt Þdt
v−1
+ kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞ ϕ−1 ðmÞ  ϕ−1 ðmÞ 
Γðv + 2Þ2v+2+ð2/qÞ ðpv + 1Þ1/p ð ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ  !1/q
h   q
q  q i1/q  ′ 
 f oϕ ðt Þ ϕ ′ ðt Þdt
kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞
 η  f ′ ð m Þ ,  f ′ ð n Þ  ×
ϕ−1 ðmÞ
+
ΓðvÞ
10 Journal of Function Spaces

ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ ð −1 p !1/p where

 ϕ ðmÞ 
 
×  ϕ ′ ðxÞðn − ϕðxÞÞ dx ϕ ′ ðt Þdt
v−1
ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ  t 
ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ   q
!1/q ð ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ ð t p

 ′   
×  f oϕ ðt Þ ϕ ′ ðt Þdt  ðϕðt Þ − mÞ ðn − ϕðt ÞÞ ϕ ′ ðt Þdt
v−1

ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ ϕ−1 ðmÞ  ϕ−1 ðmÞ 

kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞ ðn − mÞpv+2 ðpv + 3Þ

≤ = ,
Γ ðv Þ 2pv+2 ðpv + 1Þðpv + 2Þ
ð −1 p ð44Þ
ð ϕ−1 ðm+nÞ/2 ð t p !1/p ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ  ϕ ðnÞ 
  




ϕ ′ ðxÞðϕðxÞ − mÞ dx ϕ ′ ðt Þdt
v−1  ðn − ϕðt ÞÞv ðn − ϕðt ÞÞ ϕ ′ ðt Þdt
 ϕ−1 ðmÞ  −1
ϕ ððm+nÞ/2Þ t 
ϕ−1 ðmÞ
"ð −1 ðn − mÞpv+2
ϕ ðm+nÞ/2    = :
×  f ′ ð n Þ q + n − ϕ ð t Þ 2pv+2 ðpv + 2Þ
ϕ−1 ðmÞ n−m
#1/q
 q  q 
 η  f ′ ðmÞ ,  f ′ ðnÞ ϕ ′ ðt Þdt This completes the proof.

kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞ ð ϕ−1 ðnÞ Remark 15. From Theorem 14, we can obtain following spe-
+ × cial cases:
Γ ðv Þ ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ
ð −1 p (1) If ϕðxÞ = x, then inequality (41) becomes
 ϕ ðmÞ 
 
 ϕ ′ ðxÞðn − ϕðxÞÞ dx ϕ ′ ðt ÞdtÞ1/p
v−1
 t 
 m + nh i
"ð −1   RL v RL v
ϕ ðnÞ   f I g ð nÞ + I g ð m Þ
 f ′ ðnÞq + n − ϕðt Þ 2 h ðmþnÞ=2þ ðm+nÞ/2−
×  
n−m − gðnÞ RL
v
ðmþnÞ=2þ I g f ðnÞ
ϕ−1 ððm+nÞ/2Þ

#1/q  v  i
 q  q  
+ gðmÞ RLg I ðm+nÞ/2− f ðmÞ 
 η  f ′ ðmÞ ,  f ′ ðnÞ ϕ ′ ðt Þdt
ðn − mÞv+1   1/q
≤ kg k  f ′ ð n Þ q
ðn − mÞv+1   1/q Γðv + 1Þ2v+1+ð2/qÞ ½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞
= kg k  f ′ ð n Þq  q 1/q
½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞
Γðv + 1Þ2v+1+ð2/qÞ + kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞  f ′ ðnÞ
 q 1/q
+ kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞  f ′ ðnÞ ðn − mÞv+1
+ kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞
Γðv + 3Þ2v+2+ð2/qÞ
ðn − mÞv+1 h  q  q i1/q
+ kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞  η  f ′ ð m Þ  ,  f ′ ð n Þ
Γðv + 3Þ2v+2+ð2/qÞ
h  q  q i1/q ðn − mÞv+1
 η  f ′ ð m Þ ,  f ′ ð n Þ  + kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞
Γðv + 2Þ2v+2+ð2/qÞ ðpv + 1Þ1/p
h  q  q i1/q
ðn − mÞv+1  η  f ′ ð m Þ  ,  f ′ ð n Þ
+ kgk½m,ðm+nÞ/2,∞
Γðv + 2Þ2v+2+ð2/qÞ ðpv + 1Þ1/p
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞    1/q
h  q  q i1/q ≤2  f ′ ð n Þq
 η  f ′ ð m Þ ,  f ′ ð n Þ  Γðv + 1Þ2v+1+ð2/qÞ
"
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞    1/q +
≤2  f ′ ð n Þq Γðv + 2Þ2v+2+ð2/qÞ ðpv + 1Þ1/p
Γðv + 1Þ2v+1+ð2/qÞ #
" # ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞ ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞ +
+ + Γðv + 3Þ2v+2+ð2/qÞ
Γðv + 2Þ2v+2+ð2/qÞ ðpv + 1Þ1/p Γðv + 3Þ2v+2+ð2/qÞ     1/q
   η  f ′ ðmÞ,  f ′ ðnÞ :
  1/q
 η  f ′ ð m Þ ,  f ′ ð n Þ  , ð43Þ
ð45Þ
Journal of Function Spaces 11

(2) If ϕðxÞ = x and gðxÞ = 1, then inequality (41) of the paper. Lei Chen and Farman Ali contributed equally
becomes to this work and are first co-authors.
 v−1
2 Γðv + 1Þ
 References
 ðn − m Þv
h i m + n [1] E. Guariglia, “Fractional calculus, zeta functions and Shannon
 RL I
v
f ð n Þ + RL v
I f ð mÞ −f 
ðmþnÞ=2þ m+n/2−
2  entropy,” Open Mathematics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 87–100, 2021.
[2] P. Závada, “Operator of fractional derivative in the complex
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞    1/q plane,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 192,
≤2  f ′ ðnÞq
Γðv + 1Þ2v+1+ð2/qÞ no. 2, pp. 261–285, 1998.
" [3] E. Guariglia, “Riemann zeta fractional derivative—functional
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞ equation and link with primes,” Advances in Difference Equa-
+
Γðv + 2Þ2v+2+ð2/qÞ ðpv + 1Þ1/p tions, vol. 2019, no. 1, 15 pages, 2019.
# [4] A. Torres-Hernandez and F. Brambila-Paz, “An approxima-
ðn − mÞv+1 kgk½m,n,∞ tion to zeros of the Riemann zeta function using fractional cal-
+
Γðv + 3Þ2v+2+ð2/qÞ culus,” 2020, http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.14963.
    1/q [5] J. Hadamard, “Essay on the study of functions given by their
 η  f ′ ð m Þ ,  f ′ ð n Þ  : Taylor expansion: study on the properties of integer functions
and in particular of a function considered by Riemann,” Jour-
ð46Þ nal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, vol. 58, pp. 171–
215, 1893.
[6] S. S. Zhou, S. Rashid, K. I. Noor, F. Safdar, and Y. M. Chu,
(3) If ϕðxÞ = x, gðxÞ = 1 and v = 1, then inequality (41) “New Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for exponentially
becomes convex functions and applications,” AIMS Math, vol. 5,
 ðn m + n
pp. 6874–6901, 2020.
 1 [7] S. Rashid, M. A. Noor, and K. I. Noor, “Fractional exponen-
 
n − m f ðxÞdxs − f 2  tially m-convex functions and inequalties,” International Jour-
m
ðn − mÞ2   q 1/q nal of Analysis and Applications, vol. 17, pp. 464–478, 2019.
≤2 3+ð2/qÞ
f ′ ðnÞ [8] A. Kashuri, B. Meftah, and P. O. Mohammed, “Some weighted
2 # Simpson type inequalities for differentiable s-convex functions
ð47Þ
ðn − mÞ2 + ðp + 1Þ1/p ðn − mÞ2 and their applications,” Journal of Fractional Calculus and
+ Nonlinear Systems, vol. 1, pp. 75–94, 2021.
ðp + 1Þ1/p 23+ð2/qÞ
[9] M. A. Latif, S. Rashid, S. S. Dragomir, and Y. M. Chu, “Her-
    1/q
 η  f ′ ð m Þ ,  f ′ ð n Þ 
:
3. Conclusion
In this paper, we established Hermite-Hadamarad Fejér type
inequalities for η-convex function by using weighted frac-
tional integrals. Our results are extensions and generaliza-
tions of many existing results in the literature.
Data Availability
All data required for this research is included within the
paper.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors of this paper declare that they have no compet-
ing interests.
Authors’ Contributions
Lei Chen analyzed the results, Waqas Nazeer proposed the
problem, Farman Ali wrote the final version of the paper,
Thongchai Botmart verified the results and arranged fund-
ing for this paper, and Sarah Mehfooz wrote the first version
mite-Hadamard type inequalities for co-ordinated convex
and quasi-convex functions and their applications,” Journal
of Inequalities and Applications, vol. 317, 2019.
[10] P. O. Mohammad, M. Vivas-Cortez, T. Abdeljawad, and
Y. Rangel-Oliveros, “Integral inequalities of Hermite-
Hadamrad type for quasi-convex functions with applications,”
AIMS Math, vol. 5, pp. 7316–7331, 2020.
[11] T.-Y. Zhang, A.-P. Ji, and F. Qi, “Some inequalities of Hermite-
Hadamrad type for GA-convex functions with applications to
means,” Le Matematiche, vol. 68, pp. 229–239, 2013.
[12] D.-P. Shi, B.-Y. Xi, and F. Qi, “Hermite-Hadamard type
inequalities for Riemann-Liouvile fractional integrals of ðα, m
Þ-convex functions,” Fractional Differential Calculus, vol. 4,
no. 2, pp. 31–43, 2014.
[13] P. O. Mohammed, “Some new Hermite-Hadamrad type
inequalities for MT-convex functions on differentiable coordi-
nates,” Journal of King Saud University-Science, vol. 30,
pp. 258–262, 2018.
[14] S. S. Dragomir and C. E. M. Pearce, Selected Topics on Hermite-
Hadamard Inequalities and Applications, RGMIA Mono-
graphs; Victoria University, Footscray, VIC, Australia, 2000.
[15] S. Rashid, M. A. Noor, K. I. Noor, and A. O. Akdemir, “Some
new generalizations for exponentially s-convex functions and
inequalities via fractional operator,” Fractal and Fractional,
vol. 3, p. 24, 2019.
[16] J. Vanterler, C. Sousa, and E. Capelas de Oliveira, “On the ψ-
Hilfer fractional derivative,” Communications in Nonlinear
Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 60, pp. 70–91, 2018.
12 Journal of Function Spaces

[17] T. J. Osler, “The fractional derivative of a composite function,”

SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, vol. 1, pp. 288–293,
1970.
[18] A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, and J. J. Trujillo, “Theory and
applications of fractional differential equations,” in North-Hol-
land Mathematics Studies, vol. 204, Elsevier Science B. V,
Amaterdam, The Netherlands, 2006.
[19] F. Jarad, T. Abdeljawad, and K. Shah, “On the weighted frac-
tional operators of a function with respect to another func-
tion,” Fractals, vol. 28, p. 12, 2020.
[20] A. Fernandez, T. Abdeljawad, and D. Baleanu, “Relations
between fractional models with three-parameter Mittag-
Leffler kernels,” Advances in Difference Equations, vol. 2020,
2020.
[21] M. Vivas-Cortez, T. Abdelijawad, P. O. Mohammed, and
Y. Rangel-Oliverous, “Simpson Integral’s inequalities for twice
differentiable convex functions,” Mathematical Problems in
Engineering, vol. 2020, Article ID 1936461, 2020.
[22] B. Gavrea and I. Gavrea, “On some Ostrowski type inequal-
ties,” General Mathematics, vol. 18, pp. 33–44, 2010.
[23] C.-J. Zhao and W.-S. Cheung, “On improvements of the Roza-
nova’s inequality,” Journal of Inequalities and Applications,
vol. 2011, 2011.
[24] Y. Sawano and H. Wadade, “On the Gagliardo-Nirenberg type
inequality in the critical Sobolev-Morrey space,” Journal of
Fourier Analysis and Applications, vol. 19, pp. 20–47, 2013.
[25] H. Gunawan, “Fractional integrals and generalized Olsen
inequalities,” Kyungpook National University, vol. 49, pp. 31–
39, 2009.
[26] S. Kaijser, L. Nikolova, L.-E. Persson, and A. Wedestig, “Hardy
type inequalities via convexity,” Mathematical Inequalities &
Applications, vol. 8, pp. 403–417, 2005.
[27] P. O. Mohammed and T. Abdeljawad, “Opial type ineqaulities
for generalized fractional operators with nonsingular kernels,”
Journal of Inequalities and Applications, vol. 2020, 2020.
[28] M. Z. Sarikaya, C. C. Bilisik, and P. O. Mohammed, “Some
generalizations of Opial type inequalities,” Applied Mathemat-
ics and Information Sciences, vol. 14, pp. 809–816, 2020.
[29] A. O. Akdemir, S. I. Butt, M. Nadeem, and M. A. Ragusa, “New
general variants of Chebyshev type inequalities via generalized
fractional integral operators,” Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 2, p. -
art.n. 122, 2021.
[30] A. O. Akdemir, A. Karaoblan, M. A. Ragusa, and E. Set, “Frac-
tional integral inequalities via Atangana-Baleanu operators for
convex and concave functions,” Journal of Function Spaces,
vol. art. ID 1055434, 2021.
[31] P. O. Mohammed, H. Aydi, A. Kashuri, Y. S. Hamed, and
K. M. Abualnaja, “Midpoint inequalities in fractional calculus
defined using positive weighted symmetry function kernels,”
Symmetry, vol. 13, p. 550, 2021.