Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Impact of Practical Relevance On Training Transfer - Evidence From A Service Quality Training Program For German Bank Clerks
The Impact of Practical Relevance On Training Transfer - Evidence From A Service Quality Training Program For German Bank Clerks
ISSN 1360-3736
© 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2QD,
UK and 350 Main St., Malden, MA 02148, USA.
Introduction
In view of the increasing similarity of product characteristics, service quality has
become crucial in keeping ahead of competitors in various branches of industry. Mar-
keting researchers therefore advise managers to increase the level of market (Homburg
& Pflesser, 2000; Kohli et al., 1993; Narver & Slater, 1990), customer (Hartline et al.,
2000) and service (Homburg et al., 2002) orientation. Deshpandé et al. (1993) defined
customer orientation as the strategy of developing a durably profitable enterprise by
putting customers’ interests first. Previous research has shown that in the long term a
corporate strategy focusing on customers’ needs fosters success (Goff et al., 1997; Peters
& Waterman, 1982). Because of the high level of face-to-face contact with the customer,
customer orientation is particularly important for service companies (Kelley, 1992). The
marketing literature provides a variety of recommendations on how to improve cus-
tomer orientation, which range from the adaptation of processes, structures and incen-
tive systems, to the implementation of formal and informal control mechanisms
(Deshpandé et al., 1993; Hartline et al., 2000; Slater & Narver, 1995). Frontline employ-
ees are responsible for transferring the customer-oriented strategy into service quality
that is visible to the customer (Thomas et al., 2001). Therefore, Berry et al. (1988) advise
companies to conduct training programs for this target group.
The question of how to ensure that service quality training programs actually lead to
better service performance has not yet been sufficiently analysed. The finding that, in
general, trainees only apply about 30 per cent (Robinson & Robinson, 1995) of the
training content draws special attention to the importance of monitoring and evaluat-
ing the transfer process. Although the number of publications addressing training
transfer has increased since Baldwin and Ford published their theoretical framework
in 1988, there is still a lack of studies explaining how transfer can be optimized (Hawley
& Barnard, 2005; Holton & Baldwin, 2000). In particular, the specific challenges of
assuring the transfer of service quality training has not been analysed. This study aims
at closing this gap and discovering crucial influencing factors in the transfer process of
service quality training. The article suggests a model that combines Baldwin and Ford’s
(1988) theoretical framework of training transfer and Kirkpatrick’s (1960) levels of
training evaluation. As Alliger et al.’s (1997) meta-analysis shows that studies still
conceptualize Kirkpatrick’s first level inconsistently, the present article offers a clear
concept of trainee satisfaction, which is conceptually distinguished from perceived
practical relevance of the training as a nonevaluative measure. The study tests the
suggested model in the field of financial services in Germany, where the level of
required service quality has increased in recent years.
Working environment
Besides individual characteristics and the training transfer design, a supporting trans-
fer climate is crucial for transfer motivation (Forehand & Gilmer, 1964; Goldstein &
Ford, 2002; Holton et al., 1997). A positive transfer climate provides adequate resources
and opportunities to apply the new knowledge, as well as cues to remind the trainee of
lessons learned (Ford et al., 1992; Karl et al., 1993; Noe & Wilk, 1993; Rouiller &
Goldstein, 1993; Tracey et al., 1995). Particularly the support of managers, supervisors
(Birdi et al., 1997; Clark et al., 1993; Clarke, 2002; Facteau et al., 1995; Richman-Hirsch,
2001; Russ-Eft, 2002) and peers (Bates et al., 2000; Hawley & Barnard, 2005), through
feedback and reinforcement, is a decisive factor in transfer. The present study expects
a positive relation between the supervisor support and the transfer motivation.
H8 The higher the degree of supervisor support in the working environment, the
higher the transfer motivation.
Criteria
Criteria for evaluating the training effects are directly derived from the training goals
and structured on the first three levels of Kirkpatrick’s (1960) concept. The three criteria
are measured at the same level of specificity (Alliger et al., 1997).
Reaction was measured on three 6-point Likert-type scales. Subjects reported the
degree to which the training content matched their personal needs of development
(‘needs’), the fulfilment of their expectations (‘expectations’) and their overall satisfac-
tion (’satisfaction’).
Items used to measure the learning effects were directly derived from the training
goals defined by the human resource management. The participants stated the degree
to which they were aware of the management’s expectations in terms of customer
orientation (’demands’). In addition, the subjects indicated how responsible they felt
for selling the bank’s products (’responsibility’) and whether or not they had the
necessary knowledge to cope with their job tasks (‘competence’). All items were mea-
sured on 6-point Likert-type scales, retrospectively judging the direct changes.
To examine the training effects on the transfer level, the participants estimated their
improvement on bipolar 5-point Likert scales. Indicators are based on four crucial
factors that the management of the bank had previously defined: (1) sales performance
(’sale’); (2) appointment rate (’schedule’); (3) number of times the customer is actively
addressed (‘canvassing’); and (4) quality of customer consultancy (‘quality’).
Influencing factors
The items measuring the perceived practical relevance of the training are derived from
the suggestions of Clark and Voogel (1985) and Goldstein and Ford (2002) as well as of
May and Kahnweiler (2000). On 6-point Likert-type scales, subjects stated if they were
given the opportunities to practise new behavioural patterns during the training (‘prac-
tice’) and whether or not they were able to relate the discussed topics to their everyday
work (‘own work’).
The supervisor support was assessed via 6-point Likert scales, measuring the par-
ticipants’ perception of the supervisor’s interest in the training contents (‘interest’)
and his support for the transfer (‘support’) (Richman-Hirsch, 2001; Tracey et al.,
1995).
The transfer motivation was assessed as proposed by Holton (1996) and Noe (1986).
On 6-point Likert-type scales, the subjects reported their effort to transfer the contents
Method
Structural equation modelling (LISREL 8.7) is applied to test the suggested model. As
some indicators do not follow the normal distribution, unweighted least square is used
(Bollen, 1989; Jöreskog & Sörbom, 2001). Consequently, inference statistics like chi-
square have to be interpreted with reservations (Browne, 1984). All indicator variables
are standardized to assure the comparability between the path coefficients (Long,
1993).
Results
Global fit measures of the complete model indicate a good fit. The quotient of chi-
square and the d.f. is well below the critical value of 2 (c2/d.f. = 1.65; c2 = 171.3;
d.f. = 104; Byrne 1998; Jöreskog & Sörbom, 1982). The goodness-of-fit index (GFI)
(0.993) reveals that the model excellently fits the empirical data (Bagozzi & Yi, 1988).
The adjusted goodness-of-fit index (AGFI) (0.989), which corrects the GFI by the
complexity of the model (d.f.), also shows a high fit of the model, as it exceeds the
critical value of 0.90 (Jöreskog & Sörbom, 1982). The root mean square error of approxi-
mation value of 0.055 (with the 90 per cent confidence interval ranging from 0.045 to
0.073) also indicates a good fit (Browne & Cudeck, 1993).
Additionally, measures of local fit support the suggested model. The reliability of all
indicators is higher than 0.40 (Table 1). The values of the factor reliability exceed the
required level of 0.60. The extracted average variance of all factors lies above the critical
value of 0.50 (Bagozzi & Yi, 1988). Perceived practical relevance explains the 73.5 per
cent of the variance of reaction. Reaction explains the 25.1 per cent of the variance of
learning. Taken together, perceived practical relevance, reaction and learning account
for 91.0 per cent of the variance of transfer motivation. Learning and transfer motivation
explain 61.5 per cent of the variance of transfer.
With one exception, all structural paths are statistically significant. No statistically
significant direct correlation can be found between perceived practical relevance and
transfer motivation (t < 1.96; Hair et al., 2006). This path will be discussed later. First, it
is proposed to analyse the magnitude of the parameters of the significant paths in order
to evaluate which direct antecedents are most important for the transfer process. As H1
postulates, the trainee is more likely to learn training contents, the more satisfied he
is with the training program (Figure 1, b = 0.50). Subsequently, the more the trainee
has learned about job requirements, the more likely he is to apply the trained skills
(b = 0.40, H2). As expected, transfer motivation has a positive impact on transfer
(g = 0.49, H3). Furthermore, perceived practical relevance is identified as a crucial factor
influencing trainee reaction (g = 0.86, H7). Transfer motivation is affected mainly by
reaction (b = 0.63, H4). Both learning (b = 0.18, H5) and supervisor support (g = 0.29, H8)
Perceived
practical relevance Supervisor support
Intention
H6 H8 0.64
0.20 (0.76) 0.29 (6.20)
0.83 Improvement
0.91
H7 0.85
0.86 (6.66) transfer motivation
Transfer motivation Make easier
H4 H5 H3
0.63 (2.80) 0.18 (2.80) 0.49 (8.83)
0.73 0.25 0.61
H1 H2
.50 (11.23) 0.40 (6.17)
Reaction Learning transfer
Transfer
0.87 0.78 0.83 0.75 0.83 0.89 0.78 0.81 0.84 0.69
Needs Expectations Satisfaction Demands Responsibility Competence Canvassing Quality Sale Schedule
Supervisor support, on the other hand, does not exert considerable influence on
transfer motivation (effect = 0.287). Whereas reaction seems to play an important role in
motivating the participants to transfer the learned behaviour to practise, learning was
found to have a stronger direct effect on transfer (effect = 0.396), whereas its influence
on transfer motivation is rather low (effect = 0.176).
Managerial implications
The present study offers practical hints on how to optimize the training process. The
findings confirm that service quality training should be close to the practical settings of
the trainees and suitable to the trainees’ needs in order to ensure that the content is
applied to the job. Trainers and human resources managers are advised to analyse
trainees’ demands and expectations in the very early stages of developing the training
design. Berry et al. (1988) emphasized the importance of training the frontline employ-
ees as a means of improving service quality. This study confirms that service quality
training can promote employees’ customer orientation. However, companies should
not merely send their employees on training programs hoping they will come back
perfectly customer-oriented. Rather, training should be planned thoroughly and be
tailored to the specific training goal and working environment. An adequate degree of
perceived practical relevance is a crucial factor for guaranteeing acceptance as well as
transfer success.
References
Alliger, G. M. and Janak, E. A. (1989), ‘Kirkpatrick’s levels of training criteria: thirty years later’,
Personnel Psychology, 42, 2, 313–42.
Alliger, G. M., Tannenbaum, S. I., Bennett, W. Jr., Traver, H. and Shotland, A. (1997), ‘A meta-
analysis of the relations among training criteria’, Personnel Psychology, 50, 2, 341–58.
Althaus, G. (2002), ‘Kernkompetenz: Kundenorientierung’, in R. Herzog (ed.), Unternehmens-
führung in Genossenschaftsbanken. Erfolgsfaktoren jenseits von Managementmethoden, 2nd edn
(Wiesbaden: Deutscher Genossenschafts-Verlag), pp. 224–45.
Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W. (1988), ‘Structural equation modeling in practice: A review
and recommended two-step approach’, Psychological Bulletin, 103, 3, 411–23.
Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi, Y. (1988), ‘On the evaluation of structural equation models’, Journal of the
Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 1, 74–94.
Bagozzi, R., Yi, Y. and Phillips, L. (1991), ‘Assessing construct validity in organizational research’,
Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 3, 421–58.
Baldwin, T. T. and Ford, J. K. (1988), ‘Transfer of training: a review and directions for future
research’, Personnel Psychology, 41, 1, 63–105.
Bates, R. A., Holton, E. F., Seyler, D. L. and Carvallo, M. A. (2000), ‘The role of interpersonal factors
in the application of computer-based training in an industrial setting’, Human Resource Devel-
opment International, 3, 1, 19–42.
Bentler, P. M. and Bonett, D. G. (1980), ‘Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of
covariance structures’, Psychological Bulletin, 88, 3, 588–606.
Berry, L. L. Parasuraman, A. and Zeithaml, V. A. (1988), ‘The service-quality puzzle’, Business
Horizons, 31, 5, 35–43.
Birdi, K., Allan, C. and Warr, P. (1997), ‘Correlates of perceived outcomes of four types of
employee development activity’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 6, 845–57.
Blau, G. J. (1988), ‘Further exploring the meaning and measurement of career commitment’,
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 3, 284–97.
Bollen, K. A. (1989), Structural equations with latent variables (New York, NY: Wiley).
Browne, M. W. (1984), ‘Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance
structures’, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 1, 62–83.
Browne, M. W. and Cudeck, R. (1993), Alternative ways of assessing equation model fit’, in K.
Bollen and J. S. Long (eds), Testing Structural Equation Models (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage), pp.
136–62.
Byrne, B. M. (1998), Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: basic concepts,
applications, and programming (Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum).