Professional Documents
Culture Documents
through the use of well defined formats, use of ideology, good actors, and effects
often set in aesthetic settings.
Aesthetic Pleasure
The term aesthetics is an allusive and multifaceted concept that can be defined as a
philosophical inquiry into the art (Pappas, 2008). It is the combination of auditory and
visual elements such as appearance, tone, mood and style (Tarvainen, Westman
and Oittinen, 2015). In films, these elements are often captured through the use of
cinematic techniques, camera angles, lighting, costumes, settings, production set
design and overall composition. According to James Shelley, many concepts of
aesthetics have evolved, raising questions around the relation between aesthetic
value and experience and whether artworks are necessarily aesthetic objects. In
Hollywood movies, aesthetics are an important visual and auditory element, coupled
with style, tone, appearance and overall mood (Oxford Cambridge, 2020).
- - Each of these elements are given careful consideration, with the Director paying
close attention to the composition, production design, lighting, costumes, setting and
cinematic techniques. -https://lisbdnet.com/what-are-the-major-elements-of-
cinematic-design/
For the purpose of this essay, aesthetics will be defined as something which creates
pleasure of the mind, in this case the movie’s sensory properties and how they
complement the movie’s content, or structure (Keating, 2006).
Hollywood films' aesthetic compositions balance two opposing elements. The first,
Hollywood's tendency for unity and consistency, making its films align with the
definition of a classical art form. This format in some cases rarely changes as
production teams closely adhere to defined formats and or previous successes
(Berliner, 2017). The second element is that successful and accepted formats
include aesthetic properties as part of their composition and winning formula
(Berliner, 2017). This guarantees that the film director must incorporate elements of
aesthetic composition in the movie in order to keep to conformity and a similar look
and feel between productions (Berliner, 2017). As many Hollywood films adhere to
conventional practices and paradigms, the industry relies on outliers to push the
boundaries beyond the classical paradigm (Berliner, 2017). Such fringe productions
provide fresh and often extraordinarily complex aesthetic traits to enrich Hollywood's
conventional repertoire of filmmaking procedures (Berliner, 2017). These productions
provide novel and sophisticated attributes, bringing diversity to the cinematic
experience, which in many cases are later endorsed and deployed as standard
practice. Janet Staiger observes that innovations in Hollywood cinema substitute
"prior norms of excellence," as directors adopt "alternative standards for the field" in
an attempt to distinguish their films. With both elements at play, Hollywood cinema
can be considered both a form of classical and mass art. Hollywood producers
recognise both options, with financial implications and trade-offs between the two
genres becoming a key consideration (Berliner).
“In order to resonate to audience fears, fantasies, and experiences, the Hollywood
genres had to deal with the central conflicts and problems in U.S. society, and had to
offer soothing resolutions, assuring its audiences that all problems could be solved
within existing institutions.”13 Douglas Kellner pg 136 Berliner
Many film scholars argue that Hollywood’s success and the enjoyment it produces,
stems from aligning the films’ ideologies with the viewer’s dominant culture’s, ideals
and beliefs (Berliner, 2017). Comolli and Narboni, argued that the mere presence of
dominant ideology meets the entertainment needs of the audience (berliner 136),
while Ray contends that Hollywood success is contingent on its ideology, and its
ability to resolve and address incompatible values. (Robert ray 136
Berliner). However, Hollywood’s success should not be reduced to alignment of
ideologies, as it undermines many other artistic aspects, considerations, talent, skills,
time and resources at play, all of which play a role in producing hits. Berliner (2017)
proposes that “rather than viewing Hollywood as a tool of repressive ideology, as
many prior cinema scholars have done, we should consider ideology as a tool of
Hollywood's aesthetic aspirations”. Furthermore, Berliner demonstrates how the
cinema industry advocates and incorporates certain ideologies into the design
characteristics of Hollywood films in order to provide active entertainment products
for broad audiences, carefully avoiding others which may arouse heated debates
and negative reactions.
In real life, we are rarely presented with situations in which violence is the most
appropriate solution. However, the Hollywood action genre has mastered such
scenarios, producing films that present situations where the only rational and moral
response to the narrative is violence (Berliner, 2017). For instance, in the film ***
Fast and Furious () the viewers are presented with a scenario in which the 'good
guys' are Dominic and his crew (who are all technically car thieves and therefore
criminals) must save people by killing an antagonist. In this scenario, violence seems
to be justified, and leads the audience to feel excitement and relief. The Fast and
Furious series is just one of the many examples of Hollywood films that carefully
construct the storyline in such a way that viewers will feel “moral ecstasy” when
presented with scenarios that warrant the hero’s violent behaviour. In such
instances, the audience often approve of the use of violence, despite their
disapproval of such behaviour in real life (Berliner, 2017).
A critical element in the success of a Hollywood movie after the script is the line up
of actors and their roles. This element in Hollywood's output has remained
persistently star-centric and generic in nature with the growing appeal of movie stars
transcending the films themselves. Hollywood’s commercial success and appeal
can largely be attributed to the actors’ star power and aesthetic value to the
movie. In some cases box office success is dependent on the lead actor’s
appearance and performance (Berliner, 2017). With such influence and intrigue and
the evolution of social media, audiences follow stars’ every move, paying close
attention to every detail, be it his/her clothes, actions, conduct and aesthetics. With
such potential consumer influence, Hollywood and retailers are very focused on
maximising the commercialisation potential of actors' appearances, carefully
considering what cars they drive and clothes they wear. With such influence many
fashion companies are prepared to invest significant capital for their products to be
featured in films, which in itself can play an important role in a film’s overall
aesthetics.
Hollywood’s Audience
Many film scholars believe that film audiences are passive about the entertainment
they choose, and spend their time watching films that feature famous actors or ones
that reinforce dominant ideology. Several scholars argue that audiences are simply
pawns of Hollywood's marketing efforts (Berliner, 2017). Comolli and Narboni
contend that Hollywood dictates what the audience wants and then provides it, while
Wyatt, attributes the popularity of many Hollywood box office hits to the industry's
continued use of "high concepts" which includes easily marketable storylines,
repetitive poster imagery, saturation with trailers and promotions, and use of popular
actors, and source material. Adorno, goes as far as claiming that mass media
viewers are "powerless" in the face of a centralised "culture industry". All of these
views of Hollywood spectatorship portray filmgoers as essentially passive recipients
of ideology, mass media, and Hollywood formula, rather than active participants in
their own enjoyment.
Conclusion
Hollywood succeeds in offering aesthetic pleasure on a consistent basis while
producing periodic mega-successes. Hollywood’s history of successes and
innovations are an artistic and economic triumph crowning it the capital of the movie
industry. Over the hundred years of its existence Hollywood has consistently proven
an ability to repeat successes through systematic production and mass accessibility
which have survived the test of time. The industry has proven an ability to monitor
changes and embrace new technologies, which once proven are adopted and
reproduced in masses. Hollywood is a business that operates within tight
constraints, carefully ensuring that all the needed elements are included in
productions, including the correct level of aesthetics which are an integral part of the
product.
While scholars have tried to draw a distinction between art and entertainment,
arguing that the two cannot coexist, Hollywood’s success can attest to the fact that
mass art can afford aesthetic pleasure too. Furthermore, Hollywood has mastered
the delivery of aesthetic pleasure, systemising and packaging it on a mass scale.
In conclusion, Hollywood aesthetics is not a contradiction, rather an important and
pleasurable element which contributes to draw large crowds to the movies that
translate into box office hits.
Navarro, J., 2022. Global box office revenue 2021 | Statista. [online] Statista.
Available at: <https://www.statista.com/statistics/271856/global-box-office-
revenue/> [Accessed 8 March 2022].
French, E., 2006. Selling Shakespeare to Hollywood: The marketing of filmed
Shakespeare adaptations from 1989 into the new millennium. Univ of
Hertfordshire Press.