Professional Documents
Culture Documents
One plus one makes three: this equation is the main idea of
a merger or acquisition. The key principle behind buying a
company is to create shareholder value over and above that of
the sum of the two companies. Strong companies will act to buy
other companies to create a more competitive, cost-efficient
company. The companies will come together hoping to gain a
greater market share or to achieve greater efficiency. Because of
these potential benefits, target companies will often agree to be
purchased when they know they cannot survive alone.
Distinction between Mergers and Acquisitions
Although they are often uttered in the same breath and used as though they were
synonymous, the terms merger and acquisition mean slightly different things.
When one company takes over another and
clearly established itself as the new owner, the
purchase is called an acquisition. From a legal
point of view, the target company ceases to
exist, the buyer "swallows" the business and
the buyer's stock continues to be traded.
In the pure sense of the term, a merger happens when two firms, often of about the
same size, agree to go forward as a single new company rather than remain separately
owned and operated. This kind of action is more precisely referred to as a "merger of
equals." Both companies' stocks are surrendered and new company stock is issued in
its place. For example, both Daimler-Benz and Chrysler ceased to exist when the two
firms merged, and a new company, DaimlerChrysler, was created.
In practice, however, actual mergers of equals don't happen very often. Usually, one
company will buy another and, as part of the deal's terms, simply allow the acquired firm
to proclaim that the action is a merger of equals, even if it's technically an acquisition.
Being bought out often carries negative connotations, therefore, by describing the deal
as a merger, deal makers and top managers try to make the takeover more palatable.
A purchase deal will also be called a merger when both CEO’s agree that joining
together is in the best interest of both of their companies. But when the deal is
unfriendly - that is, when the target company does not want to be purchased - it is
always regarded as an acquisition.
Synergy
Synergy is the magic force that allows for enhanced cost efficiencies of the new
business. Synergy takes the form of revenue enhancement and cost savings. By
merging, the companies hope to benefit from the following:
Staff reductions. As every employee knows, mergers tend to mean job losses.
Consider all the money saved from reducing the number of staff members from
accounting, marketing and other departments. Job cuts will also include the
former CEO, who typically leaves with a compensation package.
Economies of scale. Size matters. Whether it's purchasing stationery or a new
corporate IT system, a bigger company placing the orders can save more on
costs. Mergers also translate into improved purchasing power to buy equipment
or office supplies - when placing larger orders, companies have a greater ability
to negotiate prices with their suppliers.
Acquiring new technology. To stay competitive, companies need to stay on top of
technological developments and their business applications. By buying a smaller
company with unique technologies, a large company can maintain or develop a
competitive edge.
Improved market reach and industry visibility. Companies buy companies to
reach new markets and grow revenues and earnings. A merge may expand two
companies' marketing and distribution, giving them new sales opportunities. A
merger can also improve a company's standing in the investment community:
bigger firms often have an easier time raising capital than smaller ones.
Varieties of Mergers
From the perspective of business structures, there is a whole host of different mergers.
Here are a few types, distinguished by the relationship between the two companies that
are merging:
Horizontal merger. Two companies that are in direct competition and share the
same product lines and markets.
Vertical merger. A customer and company or a supplier and company. Think of a
cone supplier merging with an ice cream maker.
Market-extension merger. Two companies that sell the same products in different
markets.
Product-extension merger. Two companies selling different but related products
in the same market.
Conglomeration. Two companies that have no common business areas.
A. Are the following statements about acquisitions and mergers true or false?
In the modern business world, the ownership of companies often changes. This can
happen in different ways:
■ a merger: this is when two companies join together to form a new one (e.g. Exxon
and Mobil, America Online and Time Warner).
Investment banks have mergers and acquisitions (M&A) departments that advise
companies involved in mergers and takeovers.
Companies can also work together without a change of ownership. For example,
when two or more companies decide to work together for a specific project or
product, this is called a joint venture. An example is Sony Ericsson, which
makes mobile phones
Hostile or friendly?
There are two types of takeover bid. If a company's board of directors agrees to a
takeover, it is a friendly bid (and if the shareholders agree to sell, it becomes a
friendly takeover). If the company does not want to be taken over, it is a hostile bid
(and if successful, a hostile takeover). Companies have various ways of defending
themselves against a hostile bid. They can try to fin d a white knight -
another company that they would prefer to be bought by. Or they can use the
poison pill defence ('eat me and you'll die!1) which involves issuing new shares at a
big discount. This reduces the holding of the company attempting the takeover, and
makes the takeover much more expensive.
Integration:
Horizontal integration is when a
company gets bigger by acquiring
competitors in the same field of
activity. Vertical integration is
acquiring companies involved in other
parts of the supply chain, usually to
make cost savings. There are two
possibilities: backward integration is
acquiring suppliers of raw materials or
components; forward integration is
buying distributors or retail outlets.
Companies can also buy businesses in
completely different fields, which is
known as diversification. This can be
done to reduce the risk involved in
operating in only one industry - but
diversifying into completely different
industries is a risk itself.
B. Fill in the gaps using appropriate terms:
4-BP Now Controls the Entire Supply Chain, From the Oil Refinery to the
Petrol Pump D-backward integration
5-Electrical Retailer Dixons Bids for High Street Competitor Currys
C-forward integration
Territory:land
Joint-venture
Joint-stock companies
A joint venture becomes a juridical person after it has been registered with the Ministry
of Finance. The foundation documents and the Feasibility Study are the most important
documents for the application procedure. If the Parties want to form a partnership a
Protocol of Intent is normally signed.
Foundation documents
Feasibility study
The Feasibility Study is jointly prepared bу the partners involved. It covers the objective
of а соmраnу, the working capital, the product to bе manufactured, the marketing
possibilities, the technical back-up of а project. Only after registration the соmраnу mау
ореn а bank account and conclude agreements and contracts in its own nаmе.
Formation of funds
The authorized fund is formed from initial contributions made bу the Parties and mау bе
supplemented from the profits of а joint venture. Contributions to this fund mау bе made
in cash and in kind. А joint venture is obliged to establish а reserve fund of 25 per cent
of the value of the authorized fund. It is formed bу way of annual deductions from the
profits of а joint venture. Contributions tо this fund аге tax-free.
Profits
After deductions have bееn made to the funds, the rest of the profit is divided between
the partners in proportion to their share in the authorized fund.
The profit due to the foreign partner mау bе placed in the bank, spent within the country
оr repatriated abroad. Profits mау bе transferred from Russia to foreign countries bу
way of import substitution.
А joint venture is subject to а tах оn its profits. According to the tax regulations а joint
venture is exempt from the profit tax for 2 years. The tах holiday begins from the
moment profits аге first made bу а joint venture.
А joint venture is а legal person. It mау sue and bе sued and mау also appeal to
Russian and third party courts. In case of dissolution the foreign participant has the right
to recover the initial contribution which he made to the authorized fund.
strategic alliance
Synergies
market share
shareholder value
Merger
Acquisition
to enhance
economies of scale
Equation
cost-efficient
to gain
to survive
to cease
to swallow
to go forward
Precisely
Surrender
to proclaim
Connotation
Palatable
Hostile
cost savings
Reduction
job cuts
Stationery
business applications
competitive edge
to expand
investment community
compensation package
1) set uр Agreement
3) develop Profit
4) satisfy Product
5) sign Transactions
6) raise Account
7) covег protocol of
intent
8) manufacture Requirements
Mannesmann’s chairman, Klaus Esser, opposed the Vodafone bid. He insisted that
British and American style ‘predator’ capitalism has no way in Germany. He pointed out
(1), that no German company had ever made a hostile bid for another German
company. Germans believed that the permanent threat of a takeover or a buyout, which
exist in America and Britain, is a disincentive to long-term capital investment. (2), many
German commentators claimed that workers are at least as important as shareholders,
and companies are places where people work rather than assets to be bought or sold.
(3) Esser’s main argument against Vodafone was that its offer price of $129 billion was
too low. He claimed that the bid did not represent good value for shareholders, and the
company had a better strategy and future plans than the British phone operator.
Many German business leaders argued that their corporate culture preferred
consensus: (4) Companies want to please a large majority of their shareholders, not just
the few who are looking for a quick profit. Most British commentators, (5), claimed that
German search for consensus was just a way of resisting change and inevitable global
trends. (6), German companies regularly bought foreign ones: in the previous few years,
(7), BMW had bought the British car companies Rolls Royce and Rover.
+(8) Many financial analysts considered the original offer price to be generous – (9) Too
high – Vodafone was obliged to increase it several times. Arbitrageurs succeeded in
buying about 10% of Mannesmann’s shares in the hope of making a quick profit. Esser
was very critical of these people. He accepted, (10), that this was the nature of capital
markets, and that there was nothing he could do about it. (11), 60-70% of Mannesmann
shares were owned by institutional investors. (12) Some of these were German banks,
most of them were foreign financial institutions. When Vodafone increased its offer price
sufficiently, several of these investors accepted the bid, often (13) They already
possessed Vodafone shares. (14), Vodafone was able to acquire Mannesmann for $160
bn.
II-Inversion:
Inversion can be used for emphasis when certain
words/expressions come at the beginning of a sentence.
Study the patterns and the list of words/expressions in the
box. Then practise inverting the sentences that follow.
- Never before did I compromise my goals. - Under no circumstances should
you smoke here. - Rarely does he attend our classes!
Hardly had I finished writing the letter when the phone rang. - Only by guessing can you
solve this puzzle.
Under no Never …
circumstances ...
Not only . . . but Rarely . .
also . . .
Only . . . On no account …
Hardly . . . when … Not until . . .
Not only.......................................................................................
Speaking:
A-Match each item on the left with the correct description on the right. Then use each phrase once only
to complete the phrases
Frank: Let's get started then……1…………. .' is, er, discuss how Derek's interview
Jennifer: Well, I think it's usually useful to break this kind of news midweek, rather than
doing it on a Friday afternoon.
Frank: Certainly,…………2………….
Jennifer: . . . There should be a package we offer him, and quite a few details to sort
out.
Frank: Yes certainly. Erm, I think ………3……………now, so the next question is, erm, you
know, how are we going to do it, and where?...................4…………….. .Jennifer?. . .
Derek ... I haven't really thought this through, but, erm, I mean,….5……….it
Jennifer: …..6…………..It needs to be you in your managerial role, not you in your role as a
personal friend. ... I certainly think it should be done, er, somewhere in the office, and
preferably in his office rather than in yours . . .
Derek So, the in-between thing, it's a working lunch. It's work, but it's not in the office. It
could be a compromise, yes.
Frank I mean, Jennifer, you've had a lot of experience of this. How do people react
when they . . .
Jennifer: People tend to be rather shocked, they tend to be angry, but rather briefly, and
they do tend to ...
Derek Yes, I mean but briefly, you're saying that I should get to the point and
Frank Ok, so ……..10………..I think we're agreed, Derek, that you will actually be telling
Charles . . .
Derek Yes.
Frank And that you'll do it, er, inside the company, and you'll do -it probably in your
office. Right'