104.2 Quantum Theory of Diamagnetism
Inamagnetic field, the generalized momentum Pof a particle carrying a change ¢ is
Pam? teh =m +ed yas eX" aoa)
here A is the vector potential defined through Eq. (10.17).
Scanned with CamScannerMagen
284
ang with a velocity @ in an electric ang
‘The force F acting on the charge o moring me
field is known as Lorentz force and is given :
Fee[B+ (@~ | ay
‘ehere E and H are eletric and magnetic Held strengths respectively wy
The electric and magnetic fields satis Maxwell's equat
oB=p a
v.B= 2 (ng
VxE= =F (1015)
FxBams (ann
From Eq, (10.14) it follows that B can be expressed as the curl of a vector, ie.
ads de 20
H>_B-9x8 pomnes Bha deereyin
where 7 is the vector potential. OA
‘Thus, Eq. (10.18) takes the form
¥x#=-3 (Vx 2)
vx ( + #) =0 (10.18)
>
Hence, we may set
2424 __W (vxl9-e) (4049)
where ¢ is known as scalar potential yA 4
pA 4 Ae (10.20)
ot ue oN,
We, therefore, get
Lorentz, foreé, given by Eq. (10.12), beo™™
Ponte ae- Ve Been]
Now,
xx?) = OAr _ OAz 02)
(x9 an (ee) a(t)
Sen (A) = 2 det dy toed) wos!
Scanned with CamScanneragnetism
we? 285
gad 4s Oe 9,
Oy ta (10.24)
dds _Ods a4,
a de “Be = Ge ty SA yy Ode
Fars (10.25)
eocting EA (10.26) from Eq. (10.23), we get
si!
8 (yf) — She Ode _, (8d5 BA, aA,
eT (8) ae ay
ay (10.26)
conpating Ea: (10.22) with Eq. (10.26) we find that
(992) -2 (aq) 3,96 (10.27)
Using Eq. (10-27) the components of Lorentz force \given by Ea. (10.21), along the three
cqordinate axes may be written as .
7
=mie__,06 dA, 8
> Beam = eas ae tea (2-4) vu (10.28)
(10.29)
its (de 8 :
rn meas a tex, (7-2) (10.30)
The above three equations may be copfeniently put in the following compact vector
tation:
’ 2 (nbred)=V[-e(D] Yanai
Wenow put the above equation in the Lagrangian form
d (aL) _ ab
ai ae Ber 7 10.32)
a (i) > ee
ce >
where L is the Lagrangian and q1 = 2, d2 =y and qs = 2. at VN zi ae
Clearly, if we assume the Lagrangian to be of the form po & AME
Lajmd-V-ebte a?
‘ad substitute it in Bq, (10.92), we get Bq. (10.31).
Hamiltonian is given by
‘ BoP Yt
Meteo tail
. “2k @-ajon@-] taal fain
ea? a= (#-ed) +8 os (10.34)
Scanned with CamScannerMa
286 etl
where we have used
(7- eA)
m
Ree eae state Schrédinger equation describing the motion of a Don-relativigt
terial particle is given by
material pee Hy = Eb (03s)
Using Bq, (10.34) and making the substitution?” + in, the Schrédinger alla
takes the form 2, ( weal ldabre |
¥. (dv) = (9-2) v4 2-ve
From Eq. (10.36) we see t that the effect of the magnetic field is to add to the Hamiltonian
the terms
(9 244-V)+ oe (1031)
m
HW
For an electron these terms may be treated as small perturbation. If the magnetic field B
is uniform, we may choose
AatBx?
= as
(10.38)
If the field vector B is in the z-direction then we have
B, = By =0;B,=B
and Eq, (10.38) may be written as
df
Ra=tloos
zy ez -
This gives th
ives the component of Z aloug the three coordinate axes as &
weal 1
Ar= 5 Bu Ay= 33a AL=0 we
Scanned with CamScannerLa
2 pssagnetsi
s
287
all Va =(2+
2 2 Gb
Os
4
Aegis RF 3 - 10 18 28
“Ws (iA +jAy +k) (72 452 442
( JAy ) (+52 +42)
2 A af 58
By+j- 5B: pS 492482
y}-hpe48)-(2 452 +42)
2 De Deters’.
25 + Bay
AV 7
oe 10.40)
3 (-Z- 7) (10.40)
a 1 T
Aa ALY AS + AD = GBP + Bea?
i 1
A= Pe +y’) (10.41)
Using Eqs. (10.39) to (10.41), Eq. (10.37) takes the form
,_teh B/ O98 2 124
H =i (ag 1%) +e zB @ +") (10.42)
The first term on the right-hand side of Eq. (10.42) is proportional to the orbital angular
‘momentum component L,. In mono-nuclear systems, this term gives rise to paramagnetism.
The second term gives for a spherically symmetric system a contribution
20 ne Es
B= meet +y¥ 3
'y fast order perturbation energy. The associated magnetic moment is diamagnetic:
OB PB,
OB Gm
i
“tee, the atomic susceptibility xat is given by
2
‘a= 4a -(#2)z, as B= oH (10.43)
and is
‘Sin agreement with the classical result.
Scanned with CamScannera
288 Meret
10.4.3 Discussion
On the basis of quantum orbital theo
nuclear charge Z is given by
ry the mean value of? for an orbit about an gp
in,
K ) (to4y)
adivs of the innermost orbit in hydrogen atom, » i .
* q
muthal quantum number. st
o the gram atomic diamagnetic SUsceptbi
y
where ao(= 0.528 x 10-1 m) is the ra
radial quantum number and k, the azimutha’
‘This gives for the contribution of the orbit
xa = -2.83 x 10°77
= a [n? (5,23
xa = 0.785 x 10-* | (9 — 3 (io
If the effective nuclear charge is calculated from this expression for helium with two len.
trons from its observed susceptibility (xx = —1.9 x 107°), it comes out to be 0.93 which i
too small.
‘To make the expression for susceptibility more accurate, van Vleck and Pauling mocifei
the above expression as
2 (5 3i(i+1)-1
xa = —0.785 x 10-% [= (sr) (1048)
where J, the orbital quantum number, is equal to (k ~ 1).
Pauling’s calculations necessarily involve a number of approximations. For spherically
symmetric atoms, Hartree has devised a method with which the charge distribution satistying
the Schrédinger equation may be worked out more precisely. He has given tables and curs
for a number of ions and atoms showing the charge per unit radial distance in a spherical stl
of unit thickness.
i a be the charge in electron unit per unit radial distance, then the number of electros
in the ions is equal to / ( 2) dr.
dr
0
For the diamagnetic susceptibility, he obtained
Xa = -2.83 x 0 [ (¥) ae (i057)
0
This integral can be evaluated graphically (Figure 10.2). Using atomic units for distan
the susceptibility is given by
0.785 x 10-® x area under the shaded portion of the curve
XA=
For helium this gives
Xa = —1.89 x 10-5
a value which agrees remarkably closely with the observed one (—1.9 x 107).
—
Scanned with CamScanner—+r
Figure 10.2: Variation of 1 (dN/dr) with r.
Scanned with CamScanner