"Ten-5- THE NODE VERSIONS ‘hror hwnd etn ean he rn ein Thr ley tin nt pee pt sc Es ERS sooo versions gus commen DOS TORT ‘see stich che prophet, kis itentn the prophets ebld PS itann each Popbet, aay as ar RON i323 [fenimymesmanrbgrtiyfce te lsendymaneae of angen at ceoepisiciiarner™ feecnewidoncymemee Pmt thro itt etn ae canine Forriaproein.? nest dian Saami heonre vegies [Rerome i orrte-rtaltst Giehrewhocmcoetsagmtnaby ferent Samuel 23:19 [-fngian-stew the Brocher of J€Ihanan._xilled Goliath." tac oma ise [eesnybeaten Son whchisn te RS: ony gto od poromatbePaber fictoomatte FerAd Filip ad, Whoa belivest {val hy hear, thou mayest And he V-The entire verse mising ore vey sc aeearrorccbrestce faeninrete mean ed “odo tnpn isbeae oe uzesisa Pam bewagnaradtromse, | fis Tiebod wore areomited ‘nore teres mrt Ce eaaansyuw [a a trad toate] barman ritpians 26 [{ NH) oweh ot robbery th Coda thing meting) First mv bei = me! ages cor 15:47 [=the second man isthe Lord rom nit the Lord” to Christm well over 200 caw Lateef Seman awa fe rs fe caw (hintaan Loan aenne ——— Aes 3:13.26 |e aving ried up his Son Jesus ara anne SS ad Lake 23-42 |e when thou comest into thy kingdom,” P™tzerd ne Lord reference to sus Commtera Pee st eee aaa aan OS ow [ree a cammaar flier ay iamatTie Top a E= eee terion rat eae Om ei Seatnoyraaates rwttet ein daieay [lbs ie albewio m aS tusunet 716 fon econ ingy fren doer wrong”‘mans Bot!say uno you That whosseveris Pit witieut cause : ey nhs iea sce so ketone oe Marcas ESocm dagen RAS hai eho iad Tact fotonhend eterna” fie a eter i Foe ee a eS Caos 4 [non wet engin rot Fegan ous fetch rom otensetammecsetae: [oermesstane [nr bectteteer te arena Pietehadiyhiayeageiow fientAtetehat made pronase = iene Kaela Ta aaa semi ate) fA ea baron Toa ee RRS ERTS fan aT homaae_ Ti Pescamdimclae” [oma Sans a ag En eh ae sae aiowonmra tafe Seeeen eee lava fran ato a tarhaa napa Po Mare10:24 bo enter into the kingdom of Go.” ingdom of God. an seein io lpm cerita [lye ind selbst Fon J oe nui be er [ire npr enum nea r suuvamow scans or x ages ele ese nD | anes _heschtateavaten/righwoamesris”Jathenewversons every [enedenrei reno cmphesians 3:12 pan 3:8 rec nea [Man ante by breadsoe Bat lett ever wordof God =o [Te words of be Lord ar pure sams 1267 fordrctno thal haope 0 Lord frat reserve chem rm hs pnestion TS “The words of ie ardor ras Thow.O Lard heey ho; Thos peserve i” rewateeintrdutania_0 fevsereets mr Frovilicaptsaeicear” floes ress aa See raim:s02 | totes mpntety nye a esha erate pea gyn t rere Le ES ties Sane Fawn | age at paiva onto|WHY DO WE BELIEVE THE KING JAMES VERSION OF THE BIBLE IS INERRANT & INFALLIBLE? ‘The answers snple—FATII~fth based upon what the beeches about ise 1+ TheBible(Seripar) isthe eternal Word ef God writen own by lspration Ite Gos evince how welt him. God agaist above is owm nama (Pen 38.2 HV; Mat 2229-91 Nat 2 2.36). ‘As perfects Gos hs word must be + Gd promis to preserve his pre word freefall generations (Psa 1267 KW Mau 24251 Pee 2425) God preserves is wore through copes nd wansations not rg (No orginal monuerips ext anywhere today) + Teas copies nd translation ae considered (by Gd) toe he perfec Word of God. (sh 8:32; Dest 1738-9; ce 12:24 Acts 627-28 Acts 211 a Acts 72, note Pal speak in Hebrew, bathe words ta bere spre are Gtk, ‘Trasation sot probiem or aa) ‘Bren Jesus Crs id not ead and teach romain. The Od Tartamen books ered tm were 400-120 yee removed rom the orginal wring of hem Yethe aed em sip ‘+The veracity ang author far coples an wanton important because orginal elt today fate Some copie and wanitions are not pero do nothae the perfect Word ad sywhertday, “+ while wo may not understand how God preserves his words precy, we testhat he dso becuee promised Dewoul Lite he vgn birth nd hermanymirces we cartesian how bute kwh Goda ings ae asl (Met 1:26) HE tthe one who beep his words pure nates ‘+ Bucshe many English versions ofthe lao very ferent many place, sometimes een yng oppose ngs ‘The means one a two things 1 nets the nate Word of God, and the others contain errors OR2 None are the lfalible Word of Gd, so llconai errors ‘+ Wectoosetobetee hat Gd sable thee his word pure and perfec. eenin Gg 1+ Todd whieh he pera Word of Gd, rst we contrat the two major tego of agi rantins to see which mos consistent ries the person and werk oh Lar Jru Chri nis rea obvious errs The ar ba he previous pages ta small sampling of th hoards of iferences between the moder versan ode RV, ‘whch re fret most Because te re based on iflerent resents (os: We ona passes ANY origina manuscripts The moder vesons rely heviy an ancient mnsscpe that brigated in lean Eeypt (nthe Ble» eof te caraped word) wherea te KV an prdecesr rly fn manuscrps thatoginted in Ack “Teper were aled Christians etn Anta (ce 1.2) Tat one thal yousamesng 1+ Rene hat ren whe the New Tee was ing writen, there were may, wich orup he word of God.” (cor 2:17 3 older does et mean Bett Corrptions canbe ound eve inthe caret manuf spd have ‘seid ints rants tat ed thee anasrpts se ess ‘Animporant ote: Atleast hee ines Goh song warnings fo those who alter is words See Deut 42, Prov 3035-6 and Rev 2229 ‘Yezithasboon sl tht when the IVs conase with th madera versions, there are enough words msn fromthe ‘modern versions (aed the BY) lla book the ie of he book of evlaion! ‘Thiele a seriou mater hope you wll eres dy the dteencs inthe transstins charted onthe folowing pas "pov ar comfrtabe with bl that as mistake nd God who canat ep Hisown Word pue hen th wontmatr to you Bt pleas dont ever sy ht al he Bs sy hse thr. lary, hey do nat.