Joan of Arc

Joan of Arc
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to navigationJump to search
"Jeanne d'Arc" redirects here. For other uses, see Jeanne d'Arc
(disambiguation) and Joan of Arc (disambiguation).
Saint
Joan of Arc
Historiated initial depicting Joan of Arc from Archives
Nationales, Paris, AE II 2490 [a]
Virgin
Born c. 1412
Domrémy, Duchy of Bar, Kingdom of France
Died 30 May 1431 (probably aged 19)
 Rouen, Normandy
 (then under English rule)

Venerated in  Roman Catholic Church
 Anglican Communion[2]
Beatified 18 April 1909, Saint Peter's Basilica, Rome by Pope
Pius X
Canonized 16 May 1920, Saint Peter's Basilica, Rome by Pope
Benedict XV
Feast 30 May
Patronage France; martyrs; captives; military personnel; people
ridiculed for their piety; prisoners; soldiers, women
who have served in the WAVES (Women Accepted for

Volunteer Emergency Service); and Women's Army
Corps
Joan of Arc (French: Jeanne d'Arc pronounced [ʒan daʁk]; c. 1412 – 30 May 1431) is

considered a heroine of France for her role in the siege of Orléans and
the coronation of Charles VII of France during the Hundred Years' War against England.
After successfully leading several French military actions, she was captured, handed
over to English authorities, convicted as a heretic, and burnt at the stake in 1431.
Twenty-five years later, her conviction was formally overturned. Nearly 500 years after
her death, she was canonized as a saint by the Roman Catholic Church.
Joan was born to a peasant family at Domrémy in northeast France. In 1428, she
traveled to Vaucouleurs and requested to be taken to Charles, later testifying that she
had received visions from the archangel Michael, Saint Margaret, and
Saint Catherine instructing her to support Charles and recover France from English
domination. Her request to see the king was rejected twice, but she was finally given an
escort to meet Charles at Chinon. After their interview, Charles sent Joan, who was
about 17 years old, to the siege of Orléans as part of a relief army. She arrived at the
city on 29 April 1429, and quickly gained prominence during the fighting. The siege was
lifted nine days after her arrival. Joan participated in the Loire Campaign, which
culminated in the decisive defeat of the English at the Battle of Patay. The French army
advanced on Reims and entered the city on 16 July. The next day, Charles was
crowned as the King of France in Reims Cathedral with Joan at his side. These victories
boosted French morale and paved the way for the final French victory in the Hundred
Years' War at Castillon in 1453.
After Charles's coronation, Joan and John II, Duke of Alençon's army besieged Paris.
An assault on the city was launched on 8 September. It failed, and Joan was wounded.
The French army withdrew and was disbanded. In October, Joan was participating in an
attack on the territory of Perrinet Gressart, a mercenary who had been in the service of
the English and their French allies, the Burgundians. After some initial successes, the
campaign ended in a failed attempt to take Gressart's stronghold. At the end of the
1429, Joan and her family were ennobled by Charles.
In early 1430, Joan organized a company of volunteers to relieve Compiègne, which
had been besieged by the Burgundians. She was captured by Burgundian troops on 23
May and exchanged to the English. She was put on trial by the pro-English
bishop, Pierre Cauchon, on a charge of heresy. She was declared guilty and burned at
the stake on 30 May 1431, dying at about 19 years of age. In 1456, Pope Callixtus
III authorized an inquisitorial court to investigate the original trial. The court nullified the
trial's verdict, declaring it was tainted by deceit and procedural errors, and Joan was
exonerated. Since her death, Joan has been popularly revered as a martyr. After the
French Revolution she became a national symbol of France. She was canonized in
1920, and declared a secondary patron saint of France in 1922. Joan of Arc remains a
popular figure in modern literature, painting, sculpture and music, and cultural
depictions of her continue to be created.
Contents
 1Birth and historical background

 2Early life
 3Chinon
 4Military campaigns
o 4.1Orléans
o 4.2Loire Campaign
o 4.3March to Reims and Siege of Paris
o 4.4Campaign against Perrinet Gressard
 5Capture
 6Trial
 7Execution
 8Aftermath and rehabilitation trial
 9Legacy
o 9.1Early legacy
o 9.2Symbol of France
o 9.3Saint and martyr
o 9.4Heroic woman
o 9.5Cultural legacy
 10Visions
 11Cross-dressing
 12Alleged relics
 13Revisionist theories
 14References
o 14.1Notes
o 14.2Citations
o 14.3Sources
 15External links
Birth and historical background

Further information: Name of Joan of Arc
Joan of Arc[b] was born sometime around 1412[c] in Domrémy, a small village in the
Meuse valley,[9] which is now located in the Vosges department within the historical
region of Lorraine, France.[10] Her parents were Jacques d'Arc and Isabelle Romée. Joan
had at least three brothers and a sister;[11] all but one of the brothers was older. [12] Her
father was a peasant farmer of some means. [13] The family had about 50 acres (20 ha) of
land,[14] and her father supplemented the family income with a minor position as a village
official, collecting taxes and heading the local watch. [15]
1415–1429
Controlled by Henry VI of England

Controlled by Philip III of Burgundy
Controlled by Charles VII of France
★ Main battles
--- Battle of Agincourt, 1415
--- Journey to Chinon, 1429
--- March to Reims, 1429
Joan was born during the Hundred Years' War, a conflict between the kingdoms
of England and France that had begun in 1337.[16] The cause of the war was
an inheritance dispute over the French throne.[17] Nearly all the fighting had taken place
in France, resulting in devastation to its economy. [18] At the time of Joan's birth, France
was divided politically. The French king Charles VI had suffered from bouts of mental
illness and was often unable to rule.[19] The king's brother Louis, Duke of Orléans, and
the king's cousin John the Fearless, Duke of Burgundy, quarreled over the regency of
France. The conflict climaxed with the assassination of the Duke of Orléans in 1407 on
the orders of the Duke of Burgundy. [20] This assassination began a civil war.[21] Supporters
of Charles of Orléans, who succeeded his father as duke and was placed in the custody
of his father-in-law Bernard, Count of Armagnac, became known as "Armagnacs";
supporters of the Duke of Burgundy became known as "Burgundians".[22]
Henry V of England made use of France's internal divisions when he invaded the
kingdom in 1415, winning a dramatic victory at the Battle of Agincourt.[23] Paris was taken
by the Burgundians in 1418.[24] During this time, the future French king Charles VII, who
was associated with the Armagnacs,[25] had assumed the title of Dauphin (heir to the
throne) after the deaths of his four older brothers. [26] In 1419, the Dauphin began peace
negotiations with the Duke of Burgundy, but the duke was assassinated by Armagnac
partisans during a meeting with Charles that was under a truce. The new duke of
Burgundy, Philip the Good, entered into an alliance with the English.[27] In 1420 the
queen of France, Isabeau of Bavaria, agreed to the Treaty of Troyes, permitting Henry
V to marry Charles VI's daughter Catherine of Valois, granting the succession of the
French throne to his heirs, and effectively disinheriting Charles. [28] This revived
suspicions that the Dauphin was the illegitimate product of Isabeau's rumored affair with
the late Duke of Orléans rather than the son of King Charles VI. [29] In 1422, Henry V and
Charles VI died within two months of each other. This left an infant, Henry VI of
England, the nominal king of the Anglo-French dual monarchy, but the Dauphin also
claimed his right to the French throne.[30]
Just before Joan arrived on the scene in 1429, the English had nearly achieved their
goal of an Anglo-French dual monarchy.[31] Henry V's brothers, John of Lancaster, 1st
Duke of Bedford and Humphrey, Duke of Gloucester had continued the English
conquest of France.[32] Nearly all of northern France, Paris, and parts of southwestern
France were under Anglo-Burgundian control. The Burgundians controlled Reims, which
had served as the traditional site for the coronation of French kings. This was important,
as Charles had not yet been crowned, and doing so at Reims would help legitimize his
claim to the throne.[33] During this time, there were two prophecies circulating around the
French countryside. One promised that a maid from the borderlands of Lorraine would
come forth to work miracles, and the other was that France had been lost by a woman,
[d]
but would be restored by a virgin.[35]
Early life
Joan's birthplace in Domrémy is now a museum. The village church where she attended Mass is to the right,
behind the trees.
During Joan's youth, Domrémy was a village on the border of eastern France whose
precise feudal relation was unclear. [36] Much of it lay in the Duchy of Bar.[37] Though
surrounded by pro-Burgundian lands, its people were loyal to the Armagnac cause. [38] By
1419, the war had begun to affect the area. [39] In 1425, the village's cattle were stolen by
an unaligned brigand named Henri D'Orly.[40] In 1428, the region was raided by a
Burgundian force under Antoine de Vergy,[41] who set fire to the town and destroyed its
crops.[42]
Joan had her first vision during this time.[43] Joan testified that when she was thirteen,
around 1425, a figure she identified as Saint Michael surrounded by angels appeared to
her in her father's garden.[44] After the vision, she reported weeping because she wanted
them to take her with them.[45] Throughout her life, she continued to have visions of Saint
Michael, as well as Saint Margaret the Virgin, and Saint Catherine of Alexandria.[46][e] In
1428, a young man from her village alleged that she had broken a promise of marriage.
The case was brought before an ecclesiastical court in the city of Toul and dismissed.[48]
According to Joan's later testimony, it was around this period that her visions told her
that she must leave Domrémy to help the Dauphin Charles. [49] At the beginning of 1428,
the English had been besieging Orléans and had nearly isolated it from the rest of
Charles's territory by capturing many of the smaller bridge towns across the Loire River.
[50]
The fate of Orléans was critical to the survival of the Armagnac kingdom because its
strategic position along the Loire made it the last obstacle to an assault on the
remainder of Charles's territory.[51] In May 1428,[52] Joan asked a relative named Durand
Laxart to take her to the nearby town of Vaucouleurs, where she petitioned the garrison
commander, Robert de Baudricourt, for an armed escort to take her to the Armagnac
court at Chinon. Baudricourt's sarcastic refusal did not deter her.[53] She returned the
following January and was once more refused,[54] but she gained the support of two of
Baudricourt's soldiers: Jean de Metz and Bertrand de Poulengy.[55] Meanwhile, she was
summoned to Nancy under safe-conduct by Charles II, Duke of Lorraine, who was ill
and thought Joan may be able to cure him. She offered no cures, but reprimanded the
duke for living with his mistress.[56]
Baudricourt agreed to a third meeting with Joan in February, around the time the
English captured an Armagnac relief convoy for Orléans at the Battle of the Herrings.
Metz and Poulengy's enthusiastic support for her,[57] as well as her personal
conversations with Baudricourt,[58] convinced him to allow her to go to Chinon for an
audience with the Dauphin.[59] Joan traveled with a small escort of six soldiers.[60] She
chose to wear men's clothes,[61] which were provided by her escorts and the people of
Vaucouleurs.[62]
Chinon
Late 15th-century depiction of the siege of Orléans of 1429, from Les Vigiles de Charles VII by Martial
d'Auvergne
Joan's initial meeting with Charles VII took place at the Royal Court in Chinon in late
February or early March 1429.[f] She was aged seventeen[63] and Charles twenty-six.[64]
[g]
Joan told him that she had come to raise the siege of Orléans and to lead him to
Reims for his coronation.[66] They had a private exchange that made a strong impression
on Charles,[h] but Charles and his council needed more assurance. [69] They sent her
to Poitiers to be examined by a council of theologians to verify her morality and ensure
her orthodoxy. The council declared her a good person and a good Catholic. [70] The
theologians at Poitiers did not render a decision on the source of Joan's inspiration, but
agreed that sending her to Orléans could be useful to the king [71] and would test if her
inspiration was of divine origin.[72] Afterwards, she was sent on to Tours, where she was
physically examined by women directed by Charles's mother-in-law Yolande of Aragon,
who verified her virginity.[73][i] After her examinations, the dauphin commissioned plate
armor for her, she received a banner of her own design, and had a sword brought for
her from underneath the altar in the church at Sainte-Catherine-de-Fierbois.[77] Around
this time, she began calling herself "Jeanne la Pucelle" (Joan the Maiden), emphasizing
her virginity, which was a sign of her mission. [78]
Joan of Arc in the protocol of the Parliament of Paris (1429). Drawing by Clément de Fauquembergue. French
National Archives[79][j]
Before Joan's arrival at Chinon, the Armagnac strategic situation was bad but not
hopeless.[81] The Armagnac forces were prepared to survive a prolonged siege at
Orléans.[82] The Burgundians had recently withdrawn from the siege due to
disagreements about territory,[83] and the English were unsure about continuing it. [84] But
the Armagnac leadership's morale was despairing. [85]
The effect of Joan's presence on Armagnac morale was immediate. [86] She effectively
turned the longstanding Anglo-French conflict into a religious war, [84] inspiring devotion
and the hope of divine assistance.[87] Before she had joined the siege, Joan had dictated
a letter to the Duke of Bedford warning him that she was sent by God to drive him out of
France.[88][k] In the last week of April, Joan set out from Blois as part of an army ladened
with supplies for the relief of Orléans. [90]
Military campaigns
Orléans
See also: Siege of Orléans
Joan of Arc
Joan on horseback in a 1505 illustration
Allegiance Kingdom of France
Conflict Hundred Years' War
Major battles and notable locations
[Interactive fullscreen map]
Orléans and Loire Campaign
March to Reims and Siege of Paris
Campaign against Perrinet Gressard
Compiègne
Notable locations
Joan arrived at Orléans on 29 April 1429, meeting the commander Jean de Dunois,

[91]
acting head of the ducal family of Orléans on behalf of his captive half-brother.
[92]
Because Orléans was not completely cut off, Dunois was able to get her into the city,
where she was greeted with great enthusiasm.[93] Joan was initially treated as a
figurehead to raise morale,[94] flying her banner on the battlefield. [95][l] She was not given
any formal command[97] and was excluded from military councils.[98] But she quickly
gained the faith of the Armagnac troops, who believed she could bring them to victory.
[99]
Over time, some of the Armagnac commanders would accept the advice she gave
them.[100][m]
On 4 May, the Armagnacs went on the offensive, attacking the outlying bastille de
Saint-Loup (fortress of Saint Loup). Joan was not informed of the attack. Once she
learned of it, she rode out with her banner to the site of the battle a mile east of Orléans.
She arrived just as the Armagnac soldiers were retreating after a failed assault. Her
appearance rallied the soldiers, who launched another assault and took the fortress.
[102]
On 5 May, no combat occurred since it was Ascension Thursday, a feast day Joan
deemed too holy for fighting. Instead, she told a scribe to record a letter to the English
warning them to leave France. She had it tied to an arrow that was shot by a
crossbowman.[103]
The Armagnacs resumed their offensive on 6 May. They captured Saint-Jean-le-Blanc,
which the English had deserted.[104] Though the Armagnac commanders wanted to stop,
Joan encouraged them to launch an assault against an English fortress built around a
monastery called les Augustins.[105] It was successfully captured.[106] After the capture
of les Augustins, the Armagnac commanders wanted to consolidate their gains, [107] but
Joan again argued for immediate offensive action. On the morning of 7 May, The
Armagnacs attacked the main English stronghold, les Tourelles. Joan was wounded by
an arrow between the neck and shoulder while holding her banner in the trench outside
the wall on the south bank of the river, but later returned to encourage the final assault
that took the fortress.[108] The English retreated from Orléans on 8 May, ending the siege.
[109]
At Chinon, Joan had declared that she was sent by God. [110] At Poitiers, when she was
asked to show a sign demonstrating this claim, she replied a sign would be given if she
were brought to Orléans. The lifting of the siege was interpreted by many people to be
that sign.[111] Prominent clergy such as Jacques Gelu, Archbishop of Embrun,[112] and the
theologian Jean Gerson[113] wrote treatises in support of Joan immediately following this
event.[114] In contrast, the English saw the ability of this peasant girl to defeat their armies
as proof she was possessed by the Devil.[115]
Loire Campaign
After the victory at Orléans, Joan insisted that the Armagnac forces should advance
without delay toward Reims to coronate the Dauphin. [116] Charles was persuaded and
allowed her to accompany the army under the command of John II, Duke of Alençon,
[117]
who collaboratively worked with Joan and regularly heeded her advice. [118] Before
advancing toward Reims, the Armagnacs needed to clear the way between Chinon and
Orléans by recapturing the bridge-towns along the Loire: Jargeau, Meung-sur-Loire, and
Beaugency.[119]
Political debates about strategy,[120] as well as the need to recruit additional soldiers,
[121]
delayed the start of the campaign to clear the Loire towns. The Armagnac forces
arrived at Jargeau on 11 June,[122] and forced the English to withdraw into the town's
walls. Joan sent a message to the English to surrender, but they refused. [123] Joan
advocated for a direct assault on the city walls, which was done the next day. [124] Joan's
helmet was struck by a stone while she was beneath the town's walls. [125] By the end of
the day, the town was taken. The Armagnac took few prisoners and many of the English
who did surrender were executed.[126] The Armagnac army advanced on Meung-sur-
Loire. On 15 June, they took control of the town's bridge, and the English garrison
withdrew to a castle on the Loire's north bank. [127] Most of the army continued on the
south bank of the Loire to besiege the castle at Beaugency.[128]
Late 15th-century miniature from Vigiles du roi Charles VII. The citizens of Troyes hand over the city keys to
the Dauphin and Joan.
In the meantime, the English army from Paris under the command of Sir John
Fastolf had linked up with the garrison in Meung and traveled along the north bank of
the Loire to relieve Beaugency.[129] Unaware of the approach of Fastolf's army, the
English garrison at Beaugency surrendered on 18 June. [130] The main English army
retreated toward Paris. Joan urged the Armagnacs to pursue, and the two armies
clashed southwest of the village of Patay later that day. At the Battle of Patay, the
English had prepared their forces to receive the Armagnac attack and ambush it with
hidden archers.[131] Instead, the Armagnac vanguard detected the archers and scattered
them. A rout ensued that decimated the English army. Fastolf escaped with a small
band of soldiers, but many of the English leaders were captured. [132] Although Joan
arrived at the battlefield too late to participate in the decisive action, [133] her
encouragement to pursue the English had made the victory possible. [134]
March to Reims and Siege of Paris
After the destruction of the English army at Patay, some Armagnac leaders argued for
an invasion of English-held Normandy. But Joan remained insistent that Charles must
be crowned.[135] The Dauphin agreed, and the army left Gien on 29 June to march on
Reims.[136] The advance was nearly unopposed.[137] The Burgundian-held city
of Auxerre surrendered on 3 July after three days of negotiations. [138] Other towns in the
army's path returned to Armagnac allegiance without resistance. [139] Troyes, which had a
small garrison of English and Burgundian troops, [140] was the only one to put up
opposition. After four days of negotiation, Joan directed the placement of artillery at
points around the city and ordered the soldiers to fill the town's moat with wood. Fearing
an assault, Troyes negotiated terms of surrender.[141] Reims opened its gates on 16 July
1429. Charles, Joan and the army entered in the evening, and Charles's consecration
took place the following morning.[142] Joan was accorded a place of honor at the
ceremony,[143] announcing that God's will had been fulfilled. [144]
Coronation of Charles VII at Reims Cathedral, in the presence of Joan of Arc and armoured men-at-arms (15th
century)
After the consecration, the royal court negotiated a truce of fifteen days with the Duke of
Burgundy,[145] who promised he would try to arrange the transfer of Paris to the
Armagnacs while continuing negotiations for a more definitive peace. At the end of the
truce, the Duke of Burgundy reneged on his promise. [146] Joan and the Duke of Alençon
favored a quick march on Paris,[147] but the divisions in Charles's court and continued
peace negotiations with Burgundy led to a slow advance. [148]
As the Armagnac army approached Paris, many of the towns along the way
surrendered without a fight.[149] On 15 August, the English forces under the Duke of
Bedford confronted them near Montépilloy in a fortified position that the Armagnac
commanders thought were too strong to assault. Joan personally rode out in front of the
English positions in an attempt to provoke them to attack. They refused, resulting in a
standoff.[150] The English retreated the following day.[151] The Armagnacs continued their
advance and launched an assault on Paris on 8 September.[152] During the fighting, Joan
was wounded in the leg by a crossbow bolt. She remained in a trench beneath Paris's
walls until she was rescued after nightfall.[153] The following morning the assault on Paris
was broken off. The Armagnacs had suffered 1,500 casualties. [154] In September, Charles
disbanded the army, and Joan was not allowed to work with the Duke of Alençon again.
[155]
Campaign against Perrinet Gressard

In October, Joan was sent as part of a force to attack the territory of Perrinet Gressart, a
mercenary who had served the Burgundians and English. [156] The army then besieged
Saint-Pierre-le-Moûtier, which fell after Joan encouraged a direct assault on 4
November. The army then made an unsuccessful attempt to take La-Charité-sur-
Loire in November and December.[157] At the end of December Joan returned to court,
[158]
where she learned that she and her family had been ennobled by Charles as a
reward for her services to him and the kingdom.[159][n]
Capture
Joan captured by the Burgundians at Compiègne. Mural in the Panthéon, Paris, c.1886–1890
Before the attack on Paris, Charles had negotiated a four-month truce with the
Burgundians,[161] which was extended until Easter 1430.[162] During this truce, there was
little for Joan to do.[163] In March, the Duke of Burgundy began to reclaim towns that had
been ceded to him by treaty but had not submitted to him. [164] Many of these towns were
in areas which the Armagnacs had recaptured over the previous few months.
[165]
Compiègne was one of the towns that refused to submit, and it prepared for a siege.
[166]
Joan set out with a company of volunteers to relieve the town. [167][o]
In April, Joan arrived at the town of Melun, which had expelled its Burgundian garrison.
[171]
As Joan advanced, her modest force became larger as other commanders joined
her.[172] Joan's troops advanced to Lagny-sur-Marne and won a battle against an Anglo-
Burgundian force commanded by the mercenary Franquet d'Arras. He was captured,
and Joan consented to have him executed instead of ransomed. [173] Joan's forces finally
arrived at Compiègne on 14 May.[174] After a number of defensive forays against the
Burgundian besiegers,[175] Joan was forced to disband the majority of her force because it
had become too difficult for the surrounding countryside to support. [176] Joan and about
400 of her remaining soldiers entered the city.[177]
On 23 May 1430, Joan accompanied an Armagnac force which sortied from Compiègne
in an attempt to attack the Burgundian camp at Margny, northeast of the city. It was
defeated and Joan was captured.[178][p] She agreed to surrender to a pro-Burgundian
nobleman named Lyonnel de Wandomme, a member of Jean de Luxembourg's
contingent.[180][q] Luxembourg quickly moved her to his castle at Beaulieu-les-
Fontaines near Noyes.[183] After her first attempt to escape, she was transferred
to Beaurevoir Castle. She made another attempt to escape while there, jumping from a
window of a 70-foot (21 m) tower and landing in a dry moat.[184] In November, she was
moved to the Burgundian town of Arras.[185]
The English negotiated with their Burgundian allies to pay Joan's ransom and transfer
her to their custody. Bishop Pierre Cauchon of Beauvais, a partisan supporter of the
Duke of Burgundy and the English crown,[186] played a prominent part in these
negotiations.[187] The final agreement called for the English to pay the sum of
10,000 livres tournois to obtain her from Luxembourg.[188] After the English paid the
ransom, they moved Joan to Rouen, which served as their main headquarters in
France.[189][r]
Trial
Main article: Trial of Joan of Arc
The keep of the castle of Rouen, surviving remnant of the fortress where Joan was imprisoned during her trial.
It has since become known as the "Joan of Arc Tower".
Joan was put on trial for heresy.[192] on 9 January 1431 at Rouen.[193] Joan's captors

downplayed the secular aspects of her trial by submitting her judgment to an
ecclesiastical court, but the trial was politically motivated. [194] Both the English and
Burgundians rejoiced that Joan had been removed as a military threat, [195] fearing her
because she appeared to have supernatural powers that undermined their morale. [196] In
addition, she posed a political threat. Joan testified that her voices had instructed her to
defeat the English and crown Charles, and her success was argued to be evidence
Joan was acting on behalf of God.[197] If unchallenged, her testimony would invalidate the
English claim to the rule of France[198] and undermine the University of Paris,[199] which
supported the dual monarchy ruled by an English king. [200]
The verdict was a foregone conclusion. [201] Joan's guilt could be used to compromise
Charles's claims to legitimacy by showing that he had been consecrated by the act of a
heretic.[202] Cauchon served as the ordinary judge of the trial. [203] The English subsidized
the trial's cost,[204] including payment to Cauchon[205] and Jean Le Maître,[206] who
represented the Inquisitor of France,[207] for their participation. Over two thirds of the
clergy involved with the trial were associated with University of Paris, [208] and most were
pro-Burgundian and pro-English.[209][s]
Cauchon attempted to following correct inquisitorial procedure, [211] but the trial had many
irregularities.[212] Joan should have been in the hands of the church during the trial and
guarded by women.[213] Instead, she was imprisoned by the English and guarded by
ordinary soldiers under the service of the Duke of Bedford. [214] Contrary to canon law,
Cauchon had not established Joan's infamy before proceeding with the trial process.
[215]
Joan was not read the charges against her until well after her interrogations began.
[216]
The interrogation procedures were below inquisitorial standards, [217] subjecting Joan to
lengthy interrogations[218] without legal counsel.[219] There is evidence that the trial records
were falsified.[220][t]
Joan of Arc interrogated in her prison cell by the Cardinal of Winchester, by Hippolyte Delaroche, 1824, Musée
des Beaux-Arts, Rouen, France
During the trial, Joan showed remarkable control. [223] She was able to induce her
interrogators to ask questions sequentially rather than simultaneously, refer back to
their records when appropriate, and end the sessions when she requested. [224] Witnesses
at the trial were impressed by her prudence when answering the questions posed to
her.[225] For example, in one exchange she was asked if she knew she was in God's
grace. The question was meant as a scholarly trap, as church doctrine held that nobody
could be certain of being in God's grace. If she answered positively, she would have
been charged with heresy; if negatively, she would have confessed her own guilt. Joan
avoided the trap by stating that if she was not in God's grace, she hoped God would put
her there, and if she were in God's grace then she hoped she would remain so. [226][u] To
convince her to submit, Joan was shown the instruments of torture. When Joan refused
to be intimidated, Cauchon met with about a dozen assessors (clerical jurors) to vote
whether she should be tortured. The majority decided against it. [228]
In early May, Cauchon asked the University of Paris to deliberate on twelve articles
summarizing the accusation of heresy. It approved the charges. [229] On 23 May, Joan was
formally admonished by the court.[230] The next day, Joan was taken out to the
churchyard of the abbey of Saint-Ouen for public condemnation. As Cauchon began to
read Joan's sentence, she agreed to submit and signed an abjuration.[231][v]
Execution
Public heresy was a capital crime,[236] in which an unrepentant or relapsed heretic could
be given over to the judgment of the secular courts and punished by death. [237] Having
signed the abjuration, Joan could not be put to death as an unrepentant heretic, but she
could be put to death if she was convicted of relapsing into heresy again. [238]
Joan of Arc's Death at the Stake, by Hermann Stilke (1843)
As part of her abjuration, Joan was required to renounce wearing men's clothes. [239] She
exchanged her clothes for a woman's dress and allowed her head to be shaved. [240] But
she was kept in English custody instead of being transferred to an ecclesiastical prison.
[241]
She was returned to her cell and kept in chains.[242] Witnesses at the rehabilitation trial
stated that Joan was subjected to mistreatment and rape attempts, including one by an
English noble,[243] and that guards placed men's clothes in her cell, forcing her to wear
them.[244] Cauchon was notified that Joan had resumed wearing male clothing. He sent
clerics to admonish her to remain in submission, but the English prevented them from
visiting her.[245]
On 28 May, Cauchon personally went to Joan's cell, along with a number of other
clerics. According to the trial record, Joan said that she had gone back to wearing men's
clothes because it was more fitting that she dress like a man while being held with male
guards, and the judges had broken their promise to let her go to mass and to release
her from her chains. She stated that if they fulfilled their promises and placed her in a
decent prison, she would be obedient. [246] When Cauchon asked about her visions, Joan
stated that they had blamed her for adjuring out of fear, but she would not deny them
again. As Joan's abjuration had required her to deny her voices, this was sufficient to
convict her of relapsing into heresy and to condemn her to death. [247] The next day, forty-
two assessors were summoned to decide Joan's fate. Two recommended that she be
abandoned to the secular courts immediately. The remaining recommended that the
abjuration be read to her again and explained. [248] In the end, all voted unanimously that
Joan was a relapsed heretic, and she was to be abandoned to the secular power, the
English, for punishment.[249]
On 30 May 1431, Joan was executed at the age of about nineteen years old. In the
morning, she was allowed to receive the sacraments despite having been
excommunicated.[250] Afterwards, she was directly taken to Rouen's Vieux-Marché (Old
Marketplace), where she was publicly read her sentence of condemnation. [251] At this
point, she should have been turned over to the appropriate authority, the bailiff of
Rouen, for secular sentencing but she was not. Instead, she was delivered directly to
the English[252][w] and tied to a tall plastered pillar for execution by burning.[253] She
requested to view a cross as she died. She was given one fashioned from a stick by an
English soldier, which she kissed and placed next to her chest. [254] A
processional crucifix was fetched from the church of Saint-Saveur. She embraced it
before her hands were bound, and it was held before her eyes during her execution.
[255]
After her death, her remains were cast into the Seine River.[256]
Aftermath and rehabilitation trial

Main article: Rehabilitation trial of Joan of Arc
Joan's execution did not change the military situation. Her triumphs had raised
Armagnac morale, and the English were not able to regain their momentum. [257] Charles
retained legitimacy as the king of France,[258] despite a rival coronation held for the ten-
year-old Henry VI of England at Notre-Dame cathedral in Paris on 16 December 1431.
[259]
In 1435, the Burgundians agreed to abandon their alliance with England by signing
the Treaty of Arras.[260] The war ended twenty-two years after Joan's death with a French
victory at the Battle of Castillon in 1453,[261] which led to the expulsion of the English from
all of France except for Calais.[262]
Pope Callixtus III granted permission for Joan's rehabilitation trial in 1455 after receiving a petition from her
family.
Joan's execution had created a political liability for Charles, implying that his
consecration as the king of France had been achieved through the actions of a heretic.
[263]
On 15 February 1450, a few months after he regained Rouen, Charles had ordered
Guillaume Bouillé, a theologian and former rector of the University of Paris, to open an
inquest.[264] In a brief investigation, Bouillé interviewed seven witnesses of Joan's trial
and concluded that the judgment of Joan as a heretic was arbitrary. She had been a
prisoner of war treated as a political prisoner, and was put to death without basis.
Bouillé's report could not officially overturn the verdict but it opened the way for the
[265]
later retrial.[266]
In 1452 a second inquest into Joan's trial was opened by Cardinal Guillaume
d'Estouteville, papal legate and relative of Charles, and Jean Bréhal, who had recently
been appointed Inquisitor of France.[267] Around twenty witnesses were interviewed by
Bréhal,[268] and the inquest was guided by twenty-seven articles describing how Joan's
trial had been biased.[x] Immediately after the inquest was completed, Guillaume
d'Estouteville went to Orléans on 9 June and granted an indulgence to those who
participated in the 8 May procession and ceremonies in Joan's honor that
commemorated the lifting of the siege.[269]
The inquest still lacked the authority to change the judgement of Joan's trial, but for the
next two years d'Estouteville and Bréhal continued to work on the case. [270] Bréhal
forwarded a petition from Joan's mother, Isabelle, and Joan's two brothers Jean and
Pierre, to Pope Nicholas V in 1454.[271] Bréhal submitted a summary of his findings to
theologians and lawyers in France and Italy,[272] as well as a professor at the University of
Vienna,[273] most of whom gave opinions favorable to Joan.[274] In early 1455, Pope
Nicholas V died, and Callixtus III became pope. Callixtus granted permission for a
rehabilitation trial and appointed three commissioners to oversee the affair: Jean
Juvénal des Ursins, archbishop of Reims; Guillaume Chartier, bishop of Paris;
and Richard Olivier de Longueil, bishop of Coutances. In turn, they chose Bréhal to
serve as Inquisitor.[275]
The trial began on 7 November 1455 at Notre Dame Cathedral when Joan's mother
publicly delivered a formal request for her daughter's rehabilitation. [276] During the course
of the rehabilitation trial, the depositions of about 115 witnesses were processed. [277] The
trial came to an end on 7 July 1456 at Rouen Cathedral. The court declared that the
original trial was unjust and deceitful; Joan's abjuration, execution and their
consequences were declared nullified.[278] To emphasize the court's decision, one of the
copies of the Articles of Accusation was formally torn up. The court decreed that a cross
should be erected on the site of where Joan was burned. [279][y]
Legacy
A 1903 engraving of Joan of Arc by Albert Lynch featured in the Figaro Illustré magazine

Joan of Arc has become a semi-legendary figure and is one of the most-studied people
in Middle Ages,[281] in part because her two trials have provided a wealth of primary
source material.[282]
Early legacy
Joan's legacy began to form before her death. Just after Charles's coronation at Reims
in 1429, the poet Christine de Pizan wrote her last known poem, Ditié de Jehanne
D'Arc,[z] celebrating Joan as a supporter of Charles sent by Divine Providence.[283] As
early as 1429, Orléans began holding a celebration in honor of the raising of the siege.
[284]
After Joan's execution, her role in the victory encouraged popular support for her
rehabilition.[285] Eventually, Joan became a central part of the celebration, and a play was
written, Mistère du siège d'Orléans (Mystery of the Siege of Orléans),[286][aa] which features
her as the vehicle of the divine will that liberated Orléans. [289] Her celebration by the city
continues to this day.[290] Less than a decade after her rehabilitation trial, Pope Pius
II wrote a brief biography describing her as the maid who saved the kingdom of France.
[291]
Louis XII commissioned a full-length biography of her around 1500. [292][ab] In
1630, Edmond Richer wrote a biography calling her la Pucelle d'Orléans (The Maid of
Orléans).[78]
Symbol of France
Joan's early legacy was closely associated with the divine right of the monarchy to rule
France.[293] During the French Revolution, her reputation came into question because of
her association with the monarchy and religion, [294] and the festival in her honor held at
Orléans was suspended in 1793.[295] In 1803, Napoleon Bonaparte authorized the
renewal of the festival[296] and the creation of a new statue of Joan at Orléans, extolling
her as representative of the genius of the French people in the face of national threat.
[297]
Since that time, she's become a prominent symbol as defender of the French nation.
After the French defeat in the Franco-Prussian War, Joan became a rallying point for a
new crusade to reclaim Lorraine, the province of her birth. [298] The Third Republic held a
patriotic civic holiday in her honor,[299] and a series of French warships have been named
for her.[300] In World War I, her image was used to inspire victory. [301] During World War II,
all sides of the French cause appealed to her legacy. [302] She was a symbol for Philippe
Pétain in Vichy France,[303] a model for Charles de Gaulle's leadership of the Free
French,[304] and an example for the Communist resistance.[305] More recently, her
association with the monarchy and national liberation has made her a symbol for the
French far right, including the monarchist movement Action Française[306] and
the National Front Party.[307] Joan's image has been used by the entire spectrum of
French politics.[308] To the present day, Joan remains an important reference in political
dialogue regarding French identity and unity. [309]
Saint and martyr
See also: Canonization of Joan of Arc
Joan is a virgin saint in the Roman Catholic Church. Joan was seen as religious figure
in Orléans ever since the lifting of the siege, and an annual panegyric was pronounced
on her behalf in the city until the 1800s. [310] In 1849, the Bishop of Orlėans Félix
Dupanloup delivered a panegyric that attracted international attention [311] and, in 1869, he
petitioned Rome to begin beatification proceedings.[312] She was beatified by Pope Pius
X in 1909, and canonized on 16 May 1920 by Pope Benedict XV.[313] Her feast day is 30
May, the anniversary of her execution.[314] In an apostolic letter delivered on 2 March
1922, Pope Pius XI declared Joan a secondary patron saint of France. [315]
During her trial, Joan stated that her visions told her she would undergo martyrdom.
[316]
She was not canonized as a martyr of the church,[317][ac] but since her death,[319] Joan
has been popularly revered as a martyr who suffered for her modesty and purity,[320] her
country,[321] and her faith.[322]
Joan's legacy as a religious figure extends beyond the Catholic Church. She
is remembered as a visionary in the Church of England with a commemoration on 30
May.[2] She is revered in the pantheon of the Cao Dai religion.[323]
Heroic woman
Joan of Arc statue in Orléans, by Denis Foyatier, 1855
Jeanne d'Arc, a gilded bronze equestrian statue exhibited at the Place des Pyramides in Paris, by Emmanuel
Frémiet, 1874
While Joan was alive, she was already being compared to biblical women heroes, such
as Esther, Judith, and Deborah.[324] She fulfilled the traditionally male role of a military
leader,[325] while maintaining her status as a brave and valiant woman. [326] Her claim of
virginity, which signified her virtue and sincerity,[327] was upheld by women of status from
both the Armagnac and Burgundian-English sides of the Hundred Years' War: Yolande
of Aragon, Charles's mother-in-law, and Anne of Burgundy, Duchess of Bedford.[328] Joan
has been described as representing the best qualities of both sexes: she heeded her
inner experience,[329] fought for what she believed in,[330] and encouraged others to do the
same.[331]
Cultural legacy
See also: Cultural depictions of Joan of Arc
Joan remains a major cultural figure. In the nineteenth century, hundreds of work of art
about her—including biographies, plays, and musical scores—were created in France,
and her story became popular as an artistic subject in Europe and North America.
[332]
She is the topic of thousands of books.[333] Her legacy has become global, as her story
inspires novels, plays, poems, operas, films, paintings, children's books, advertising,
computer games, comics and popular culture across the world. [334]
Visions
Jeanne d'Arc, by Eugène Thirion (1876). Late 19th century images such as this often had political undertones
because of French territorial cessions to Germany in 1871. (Chautou, Church of Notre Dame).
In Joan's time, theologians assumed that visions could have a supernatural source.
[335]
The assessors at her trial focused on determining the specific source of Joan's
visions,[336] using an ecclesiastical form of discretio spirituum (discernment of spirits).
[337]
Because she was accused of heresy, they sought to show that her visions were false.
[338]
The rehabilitation trial did not clarify the issue. Though it nullified Joan's sentence, it
did not declare her visions authentic.[339][ad] In 1894 Pope Leo XIII declared that Joan's
mission was divinely inspired, and by the end of her canonization trial in 1903, her
visions were seen as part of that mission.[341]
Contemporary scholars have suggested neurological and psychiatric causes as the
source of her visions.[342] Her visions have been conjectured to be hallucinations arising
from epilepsy[343] or a temporal lobe tuberculoma.[344] Others have implicated ergot
poisoning,[345] schizophrenia,[346] and delusional disorder.[347] One of the Promotors of the
Faith at her 1903 canonization trial suggested her voices may have been manifestations
of hysteria.[348] It has been argued that Joan's visions were a product of
creative psychopathy induced by her early childhood rearing[349] or that they were partly
an artifact produced by her interrogation during her trial. [350][ae] None of these explanations
has strong support, and each has been challenged. [af]
Although the source of Joan's visions has not been conclusively identified, her belief
that her visions came from God strengthened her confidence and resolve, [353] as well as
providing hope during her capture and trial. [354]
Cross-dressing
Joan of Arc in armor, from the New Orleans copy of Frémiet's statue Jeanne D'Arc
From the time of her journey to Chinon to her abjuration, Joan usually wore men's
clothes.[355] She cropped her hair in a male fashion.[356] When she left Vaucouleurs to see
the Dauphin in Chinon, Joan was said to have worn a black doublet, a black tunic, and a
short black cap.[357] By the time she was captured, she had acquired a more elaborate
outfit.[ag] During the trial proceedings, Joan is not recorded as giving a practical reason
why she cross-dressed.[359] She stated that it was her own choice to wear men's clothes,
[360]
and that she did so not at the request of men but by the command of God and his
angels.[361] She stated she would return to wearing women's clothes when she fulfilled
her calling.[362]
Joan's cross-dressing became one of the principle articles in her accusation at her trial.
[363]
In the view of the assessors, it was the emblem of her heresy. [364] Joan's final
condemnation began when she was found to have resumed wearing men's clothes,
[365]
which was taken as an overt sign that she had relapsed by listening to her voices
again.[366]
Although Joan's cross-dressing was used to justify her execution, the Church's position
on it was not clear. In general, cross-dressing was seen as a sin, but there was not
agreement about its severity.[367] Exceptions were allowed too.[ah] Soon after the siege of
Orléans had been lifted, Jean Gerson claimed that Joan's male clothes and haircut were
appropriate for her calling, as she exposed herself as a warrior and men's clothes were
more practical.[371]
Other reasons for Joan's cross-dressing have been suggested. It has been argued that
it may have helped her maintain her virginity by deterring rape [372][ai] and signalling her
unavailability as a sexual object.[374] For most of her active life, Joan did not cross-dress
to hide her gender.[375] Rather, it may have functioned to emphasize her unique
identity[376] as La Pucelle, a role that was neither male nor female[377] but a model of virtue
that inspired people.[378]
Alleged relics
Helmeted head from a late Gothic statue of a saint, which was once believed to have been modeled after Joan
of Arc.[379][aj]
In 1867, a jar was found in a Paris pharmacy with the inscription "Remains found under
the stake of Joan of Arc, virgin of Orleans." They consisted of a charred human rib,
carbonized wood, a piece of linen, and a cat femur—explained as the practice of
throwing black cats onto the pyre of witches. Beginning in 2006, a forensic study
including carbon-14 dating and spectroscopic analyses was performed. The
researchers determined that the remains came from the balm of an
Egyptian mummy from the sixth to the third century BC.[381]
In March 2016, a ring believed to have been worn by Joan was sold at auction to
the Puy du Fou, a historical theme park, for £300,000.[382] There is no conclusive proof
that she owned the ring, but its unusual design matches Joan's own description of her
own ring at her trial.[383] The ring was reportedly obtained by Cardinal Henry Beaufort,
who attended Joan's trial and execution in 1431. [384] Arts Council England later
determined the ring should not have left the United Kingdom. The purchasers appealed
to Queen Elizabeth II, and the ring was allowed to remain in France. [385]
Revisionist theories
Main article: Alternative historical interpretations of Joan of Arc
The accepted version of Joan of Arc's life has been challenged by revisionist authors.
Claims include: that she was not actually burned at the stake; [386] that she was secretly
the half sister of King Charles VII;[387] that she was a member of a pagan cult;[388] and that
most of her story was fabricated in later times.[389]
References
Notes
1. ^ This image is allegedly dated to the second half of the 15th century, but it may be an art
forgery.[1]
2. ^ Her name was written in a variety of ways, particularly before the mid-19th century. Her last
name was often spelled "Darc" without the apostrophe,[3] and her signature appears as
"Jehanne".[4]
3. ^ At her trial, Joan seemed uncertain of her birthdate. [5] Perceval de Boulainvilliers, a
councillor of Charles VII, wrote a letter to the Duke of Milan stating that Joan was born on
the feast of the Epiphany (6 January),[6] but his letter is filled with literary tropes that make it
questionable as a statement of fact.[7] Neither Joan's mother nor the witnesses at the
rehabilitation trial mention her being born on Epiphany.[8]
4. ^ The woman was Isabeau of Bavaria, who was blamed for the Treaty of Troyes. [34]
5. ^ Joan did not not specify which Saints Margaret and Catherine were in her visions, but most
scholars assume she was referring to Margaret of Antioch and Catherine of Alexandria.[47]
6. ^ Some historians put the time in February (e.g., Castor 2015, p. 3;Vale 1974, p. 46). Others
in March (e.g., Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 22). See Lowell 1896, p. 62, footenote 1 for a
discussion of the ambiguity.
7. ^ Witnesses at the rehabilitation trial who were not at Joan's first meeting with Charles report
hearing that he had hidden himself in the crowd among members of the court, but Joan
quickly identified and approached him.[65]
8. ^ Some writers have argued that Joan eased his mind about the legitimacy of his birth, [67] but
others question this possibility.[68]
9. ^ The examination of Joan's virginity was to establish if she was indeed the prophesied
virgin[74] who would save France, to show the purity of her devotion,[75] and to ensure there was
no chance she had consorted with the Devil. [76]
10. ^ Fauquembergue's drawing on the margin of a Parliament's register is the only known
contemporary representation of Joan. This artist's impression is fanciful, depicting her with
long hair and a dress rather than with short hair and armor. [80]
11. ^ Joan was illiterate and it is believed that she dictated her letters to scribes. [89]
12. ^ Joan testified she preferred her banner to a sword and never killed anyone. [96]
13. ^ At the rehabilitation trial, some of the commanders testified that she had an uncanny ability
for performing tasks such as assembling the army and arranging the disposition of troops and
artillery.[101]
14. ^ Biographers Frances Gies and Vita Sackville-West state that when Joan's family was
ennobled, the family name became "du Lys", after the fleur-de-lis of France. [160] The
historians Régine Pernoud and Marie-Véronique Clin are more cautious in their conclusions,
but state that Joan's brothers, Jean and Pierre, called themselves by that name later in life.
(See Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 222, 235)
15. ^ Joan set out without the explicit permission of Charles, who was still observing the truce.
[168]
This may have been a desperate act that could be seen as treason, [169] but it has been
argued that she could not have launched the expedition without funding from the court. [170]
16. ^ DeVries describes three different accounts of Joan's capture. [179]
17. ^ Gies gives three sources for Joan's surrender to Wandomme, two of whom state that Joan
offered him her parole and one that states she didn't.[181] Joan testified that she did not
promise not to attempt to escape.[182]
18. ^ Most biographers agree that there is little evidence that Charles tried to save Joan once she
was transferred to the English,[190] though historian Pierre Champion argues that attempts
were made.[191]
19. ^ All but eight of the 131 clergy who participated in the trial were French. [210]
20. ^ One of the clerics at the trial, Jean Lohier, stepped down from the trial and challenged it
because he felt the testimony was coerced and its intention was to entrap Joan. [221] Nicholas
de Houppeville challenged Cauchon's right to judge the trial and was jailed. [222]
21. ^ At the rehabilitation trial, court notary Boisguillaume testified that at the moment the court
heard her reply, he was amazed.[227]
22. ^ The details of Joan's submission are unclear. Some biographers state that she did not
explicitly agree to abjure but only to sign the document, [232] which she could not read because
she was illiterate.[233] The abjuration was read aloud to her,[234] but its contents are unknown as
the original document was replaced with a longer one in the official record. [235] Quicherat
1841a, pp. 446–448 provides the official record's text of the abjuration document, which is
written in French. See Linder 2017 for an English translation.
23. ^ Lightbody 1961, pp. 133–134 argues that the claim that Joan was executed without a
secular sentence may have been due to the biases of the rehabilitation trial.
24. ^ see Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 152–155 for a translation of the articles.
25. ^ In his final summary of the trial, the Recollectio, Bréhal suggested that Cauchon and the
assessors who supported him in prosecuting Joan could be guilty of heresy. [280]
26. ^ See de Pizan 1497, pp. 41–50 for an English translation.
27. ^ The extant version of the mystery play is thought to have been written sometime in the mid
1400s.[287] Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 243 date a version to 1435, but one may have been written
to celebrate the rehabilitation of Joan in July 1456.[288]
28. ^ See Anon. 1500 for an English translation.
29. ^ Benedict XV's papal bull Divina disponente (Benedict XV 1920) canonizes Joan as
a Virgo [Virgin], not Virgo et Martyr [Virgin and Martyr].[318] For arguments given for not
canonizing her as a martyr, see those made by the Promotor of the Faith Augustine Caprara
(summarized in Kelly 1996, p. 206) during the inquisition that lead to her beatification in 1909,
as well as those made by the Catholic theologian Jean Guitton (summarized in Guillemin
1970, p. 256).
30. ^ Although Bréhal, the inquisitor at the rehabilitation trial, did state that Joan "had very good
reason always to trust her voices. For in very truth she was delivered, as they promised, from
the prison of the body by martyrdom and a great victory: the victory of patience". [340]
31. ^ The historian Johan Huizinga also argues that Joan's visions may not have been named
until her trial.[351]
32. ^ For example, Mackowiak 2007, pp. 138–129 points out problems with assuming Joan had
schizophrenia, ergot poisoning or temporal lobe issues; Hughes 2005 disputes the conjecture
that she had epilepsy; Nores & Yakovleff 1995 argue against her visions being caused by
tuberculosis; one of Joan's advocates at the canonization trial pointed out that her case did
not meet the clinical descriptions of hysteria;[352] and Ratnasuriya 1986, pp. 234–235 questions
diagnosing Joan as a creative psychopath.
33. ^ According to the trial record, she was accused of having "her hair her hair cropped short
and round like a young fop's, she wore shirt, breeches, doublet, with hose joined together and
fastened to the said doublet by 20 points, long leggings laced on the outside, a short mantle
reaching to the knees, or therabouts, a close-cut cap, tightfitting boots, and buskins, long
spurs, sword, dagger, breastplate, lance, and other arms in the style of a man-at-arms". [358]
34. ^ For example, Thomas Aquinas argued that a woman may wear man's clothes to hide
herself from enemies or when other clothes are lacking. [368] Joan was in the former situation
when she rode through enemy territory to get to Chinon,[369] and she was in the latter situation
after her abjuration when all she had available were men's clothes. [370]
35. ^ Scholars have pointed out that when Joan was imprisoned, wearing men's clothes would
have only been a minor deterrent to rape as she was shackled most of the time. [373]
36. ^ Playwright George Bernard Shaw surmises that Joan was the model for the sculpture.[380]
Citations
1. ^ Contamine 2007, p. 199: Cette miniature du XVe siècle, très soignée (l'étendard correspond
exactement à la description que Jeanne d'Arc elle-même en donnera lors de son procès) ...
Mais c'est précisément cette exactitude, et cette coïncidence, trop belle pour être vraie, qui
éveillent—ou plutôt auraient dû éveiller—les soupçons ... [This miniature from the 15th
century, very neat (the banner corresponds exactly to the description that Joan of Arc herself
will give during her trial) ... But it is precisely this exactitude, and this coincidence, too good to
be true, which arouses—or rather should have aroused—suspicion ...]
2. ^ Jump up to:a b The Calendar 2021.
3. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 220–221.
4. ^ , Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 81.
5. ^ Quicherat 1841a, p. 46: interrogata cujus aetatais ipsa erat, respondit quod, prout sibit
vedetur, est quasi xix annorum. [asked what her age was, she [Joan] replied that, her guess
was that she was almost 19 years old".]
6. ^ Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 6.
7. ^ Gies 1981, p. 10; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 55; Warner 1981, p. 278.
8. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 265.
9. ^ Sackville-West 1936, p. 24.
10. ^ DLP 2021: Domrémy-La-Pucelle est situé en Lorraine, dans l'ouest du département des
Vosges ... dans la vallée de la Meuse. ["Domrémy-La-Pucelle is located in Lorraine, in the
western part of the Vosges department ... in the Meuse valley."]; Gies 1981, p. 10.
11. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 36; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 221.
12. ^ Lowell 1896, pp. 19–20; Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 8.
13. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 37; Vale 1974, p. 46.
14. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 221.
15. ^ Lowell 1896, pp. 19–20; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 221.
16. ^ Lace 1994, p. 8.
17. ^ Lace 1994, pp. 10–11.
18. ^ Aberth 2000, pp. 85–86.
19. ^ Seward 1982, pp. 143–144.
20. ^ Burgundy Today 2012; Sackville-West 1936, p. 21.
21. ^ Seward 1982, p. 144.
22. ^ Barker 2009, p. 5.
23. ^ DeVries 1999, pp. 19–22; Tuchman 1982, pp. 583–585.
24. ^ Sizer 2007.
25. ^ Barker 2009, p. 29.
26. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 168; Vale 1974, p. 21.
27. ^ Barker 2009, pp. 26–27; Burne 1956, p. 142.
28. ^ Barker 2009, pp. 28–29; Russell 2014, p. 27.
29. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 189.
30. ^ Curry et al. 2015, p. 105; Vale 1974, pp. 32–33.
31. ^ Egan 2019, p. 29.
32. ^ DeVries 1999, pp. 27–28.
33. ^ Barker 2009, p. 67; Vale 1974, p. 56.
34. ^ Fraioli 2005, p. 60.
35. ^ Fraioli 2005, p. 59.
36. ^ Castor 2015, p. 89; Lowell 1896, pp. 15–16; Sackville-West 1936, pp. 24–25.
37. ^ Lowell 1896, p. 15.
38. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 171; Sackville-West 1936, p. 25.
39. ^ Gies 1981, p. 20; Lowell 1896, pp. 21–22.
40. ^ Gies 1981, p. 20; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 266.
41. ^ Lowell 1896, pp. 33–34; Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 16–17.
42. ^ Barker 2009, p. 103; Richey 2003, p. 26.
43. ^ Lowell 1896, p. 28.
44. ^ Sackville-West 1936, pp. 53–54.
45. ^ Barstow 1986, p. 22; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 113.
46. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 113; Sackville-West 1936, p. 58; Sullivan 1996, p. 88.
47. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 113; Sullivan 1996, pp. 88–89.
48. ^ Gies 1981, p. 33; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 119; Lowell 1896, p. 24; Warner 1981, p. 14.
49. ^ Gies 1981, p. 30; Goldstone 2012, p. 98; Sackville-West 1936, p. 70.
50. ^ Barker 2009, p. 97; DeVries 1999, p. 29.
52. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 17.
53. ^ DeVries 1999, pp. 40–41.
55. ^ Castor 2015, p. 234; Lowell 1896, pp. 42–43; Sackville-West 1936, pp. 89–90.
56. ^ Gies 1981; Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 18–19.
57. ^ Castor 2015, p. 89; Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 36; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 20.
58. ^ Lowell 1896, p. 47; Sackville-West 1936, pp. 96–97.
59. ^ Sackville-West 1936, p. 98.
60. ^ Gies 1981, p. 36; Lowell 1896, p. 48.
61. ^ Gies 1981, p. 34; Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 32; Warner 1981, p. 143.
62. ^ Lowell 1896, p. 47; Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 33; Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 19–20.
63. ^ Warner 1981, p. 4.
64. ^ Gies 1981, p. 40.
66. ^ Castor 2015, p. 91; Gies 1981, p. 50; Lowell 1896, p. 57.
67. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 48; Gies 1981, p. 50; Sackville-West 1936, pp. 123–125.
68. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 24.
69. ^ Gies 1981, p. 53.
70. ^ Castor 2015, p. 96; Gies 1981, p. 53.
71. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 50; Richey 2003, p. 34; Sackville-West 1936, p. 136.
72. ^ Barker 2009, p. 108; Vale 1974, p. 56.
73. ^ Gies 1981, p. 54; Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 76; Sackville-West 1936, p. 138.
74. ^ Barker 2009, p. 107; Castor 2015, p. 97; Gies 1981, p. 54.
75. ^ Barker 2009, p. 107; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 31.
76. ^ Michelet 1855, p. 55; Sackville-West 1936, p. 138.
77. ^ DeVries 1999, pp. 50–51; Gies 1981, pp. 59–60; Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 36–37.
78. ^ Jump up to:a b Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 220.
79. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 165.
80. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 31; Maddox 2012, p. 442.
81. ^ Warner 1981, p. 54.
82. ^ Gies 1981, pp. 43–44.
83. ^ Barker 2009, p. 108.
84. ^ Jump up to:a b Vale 1974, p. 55.
85. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 28.
86. ^ Richey 2003, p. 39; Warner 1981, p. 54.
87. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 31.
88. ^ Lucie-Smith 1976, pp. 78–79; Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 34–35; Richey 2003, pp. 34–35.
89. ^ Warner 1981, p. 94.
91. ^ Richey 2003, p. 50.
92. ^ DeVries 1999, pp. 63–64.
93. ^ Barker 2009, pp. 114–115; Gies 1981, p. 72; Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 40–41.
94. ^ Barker 2009, p. 118; Warner 1981, p. 64.
95. ^ Gies 1981, p. 168; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 114; Warner 1981, p. 68.
96. ^ Quicherat 1841a, p. 300: Interrogata quem prædiligebat, ensem vel estandart sive vexillum:
respondit quod prædiligebat l'estendard quam ensem, quadraginta vicibus. ... et dixit quod
nunquam interfecerat hominem. [Asked whether she preferred her sword or standard: she
responded that she preferred her standard forty times more. ...she said she never killed a
man]
97. ^ Richey 2003, p. 39; DeVries 1999, p. 76.
98. ^ Gies 1981, pp. 71, 75; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 39; Warner 1981, p. 64.
99. ^ DeVries 1996, p. 4; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 230; Richey 2003, p. 40.
100. ^ DeVries 1999, pp. 103–104; Gies 1981, p. 86.
101. ^ DeVries 1996, p. 9; Pernoud 1962, p. 63.
102. ^ Barker 2009, p. 116; Gies 1981, pp. 74–75; Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 43–44.
103. ^ Richey 2003, p. 57; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 44.
105. ^ Barker 2009, p. 117; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 45; Richey 2003, p. 58.
106. ^ Barker 2009, p. 118; DeVries 1999, pp. 82–85; Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 45–46.
107. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 85; Gies 1981, p. 78; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 46.
108. ^ Gies 1981, pp. 79–78; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 47; Richey 2003, p. 61.
109. ^ Barker 2009, p. 118; DeVries 1999, pp. 82–85; Gies 1981, pp. 79–78.
110. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 22; Warner 1981, p. 63.
111. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 56; Warner 1981, p. 63.
112. ^ Fraioli 2000, pp. 87–88.
113. ^ Michelet 1855, pp. 80–81.
114. ^ Lang 1909, pp. 146–147; Warner 1981, p. 63.
115. ^ Boyd 1986, p. 116; DeVries 1996, p. 10; Gies 1981, p. 87; Seward 1982, pp. 213–
214.
116. ^ Lucie-Smith 1976, pp. 126–127; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 157; Richey 2003, p. 66.
117. ^ Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 128; Richey 2003, p. 66.
118. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 102; Gies 1981, p. 90.
119. ^ Castor 2015, p. 114; Lucie-Smith 1976, pp. 127–128; Lowell 1896, p. 116.
120. ^ Lucie-Smith 1976, pp. 126–127; Lowell 1896, pp. 116–117; Richey 2003, p. 66.
121. ^ Castor 2015, p. 114; DeVries 1999, p. 99; Gies 1981, p. 90.
122. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 101; Barker 2009, p. 120.
123. ^ Burne 1956, p. 250; DeVries 1999, p. 104; Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 131.
124. ^ Burne 1956, p. 250; Castor 2015, p. 115; DeVries 1999, p. 105.
125. ^ Castor 2015, p. 115; Lowell 1896, p. 126.
126. ^ Barker 2009, pp. 120–121; DeVries 1999, p. 104; Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 132.
127. ^ Burne 1956, p. 252.
128. ^ Barker 2009, p. 121; Burne 1956, p. 252; Gies 1981, pp. 94–91.
129. ^ Barker 2009, p. 122; Burne 1956, pp. 253–254.
130. ^ Barker 2009, p. 122.
131. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 118.
132. ^ Gies 1981, p. 98.
133. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 120; Gies 1981, p. 98.
134. ^ Burne 1956, p. 256; Gies 1981, p. 100; Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 140; Pernoud & Clin
1986, p. 60; Richey 2003, p. 75.
135. ^ Barker 2009, p. 126; Gies 1981, pp. 101–103, 105.
136. ^ Michelet 1855, pp. 86–87; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 62.
137. ^ Barker 2009, p. 126; Burne 1956, p. 261.
138. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 128; Gies 1981, p. 106.
140. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 130; Michelet 1855, p. 87.
141. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 130; Michelet 1855, p. 89–90; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 63.
142. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 133; Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 159.
143. ^ Barker 2009, p. 126; Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 162.
145. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 72.
146. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 140; Lowell 1896, pp. 163–164.
147. ^ Barker 2009, p. 128; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 72; Richey 2003, p. 78.
148. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 147; Lowell 1896, pp. 163–164; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 69.
150. ^ Barker 2009, p. 132; DeVries 1999, pp. 142–143.
151. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 144.
154. ^ Barker 2009, p. 136.
155. ^ Barker 2009, pp. 136–137; DeVries 1999, p. 153; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 76–77.
158. ^ Gies 1981, p. 134.
159. ^ Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 193; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 81.
160. ^ Gies 1981, p. 134; Sackville-West 1936, p. 370.
161. ^ Barker 2009, p. 132; DeVries 1999, p. 145; Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 174.
162. ^ Lang 1909, p. 199; Lowell 1896, p. 193.
164. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 84.
165. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 166.
167. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 168; Gies 1981, p. 136.
168. ^ Lang 1909, p. 226; Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 84–85; Vale 1974.
170. ^ Gies 1981, p. 136; Lightbody 1961, p. 152.
172. ^ DeVries 1999, pp. 168–169; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 86.
174. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 169; Gies 1981, p. 138.
175. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 171.
176. ^ Gies 1981, p. 139.
177. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 86.
179. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 174.
180. ^ Gies 1981; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 88.
181. ^ Gies 1981, p. 141.
182. ^ Quicherat 1841a, p. 47: ... si evaderet, nullus posset eam reprehendere quod fidem
suam fregisset vel violasset, quia nulli unquam fidem dederat. [...if she [Joan] were to escape,
no one could blame her for having broken or violating her faith [parole], because she had
never given her faith [parole] to anyone.]
184. ^ Castor 2015, p. 163; Gies 1981, p. 149; Warner 1981, p. 112.
185. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 97.
186. ^ Champion 1920, p. 405; Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 208–209.
187. ^ Castor 2015; Lucie-Smith 1976.
188. ^ DeVries 1999, p. 183; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 97; Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 212.
189. ^ Castor 2015, p. 164; Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 100–101.
190. ^ France 1909, pp. li–liii; Gies 1981, pp. 143–144; DeVries 1999, p. 168; Lucie-Smith
1976, p. 218; Michelet 1855, p. 138; Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 97–98; Vale 1974, pp. 58–
59; Warner 1981, p. 110.
191. ^ Champion 1920, p. 389.
192. ^ Hobbins 2005, pp. 14–15; Sullivan 1999, p. xviii; Russell 1972, p. 262; Taylor 2006,
p. 22.
193. ^ Hobbins 2005, p. 1.
194. ^ Peters 1989, p. 69; Weiskopf 1996, p. 118.
195. ^ Rankin & Quintal 1964, pp. 111–112.
196. ^ Gies 1981, pp. 144–145; Hobbins 2005, pp. 36–37; Taylor 2006, p. 28.
197. ^ Elliot 2002, pp. 46–47.
198. ^ Hobbins 2005, p. 20.
199. ^ Gies 1981, pp. 146–147; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 107.
200. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 4; Hobbins 2005, p. 3; Verger 1972, p. 53–54.
201. ^ Hobbins 2005, p. 8; Kelly 1993, pp. 1023–1024; Sullivan 2011, p. 313.
202. ^ Boyd 1986, p. 116; Hobbins 2005, pp. 20–21; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 106; Taylor
2006, p. 27.
203. ^ Lightbody 1961, p. 102.
204. ^ Sullivan 1999, p. xiii; Gies 1981, p. 156; Lightbody 1961, pp. 102–103.
205. ^ Newhall 1934, p. 89; Warner 1981, p. 47.
206. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 214.
207. ^ Gies 1981, p. 156; Taylor 2006, p. 23.
208. ^ Hobbins 2005, p. 23.
209. ^ Pernoud 1962, p. 166; Warner 1981, p. 48.
210. ^ Hobbins 2005, p. 4; Taylor 2006, p. 23.
211. ^ Hobbins 2005, p. 18; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 108; Sullivan 2011, p. 311; Taylor
2006, p. 29.
212. ^ Gies 1981, p. 157; Hobbins 2005, p. 7; Peters 1989, p. 69.
213. ^ Taylor 2006, p. 26.
214. ^ Gies 1981, p. 154.
215. ^ Kelly 1993, pp. 1018, 1022; Taylor 2006, pp. 24–25.
216. ^ Kelly 1993, p. 1022.
217. ^ Peters 1989, p. 69.
218. ^ Sullivan 1999, pp. 88–89.
219. ^ Hobbins 2005, p. 7; Taylor 2006, p. 25, fn 79.
220. ^ Hobbins 2005, p. 7; Rankin & Quintal 1964, p. 101.
221. ^ Frank 1997, p. 54; Kelly 1993, p. 1018.
222. ^ Frank 1997, p. 54; Gies 1981, pp. 156–157; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 126.
223. ^ Gies 1981, p. 160; Taylor 2009, p. 160.
224. ^ Sullivan 1999, p. 102.
225. ^ Gies 1981, p. 160; Sullivan 1999, p. 102.
226. ^ Barstow 1986, p. 93; Gies 1981, p. 166; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 112.
227. ^ Quicherat 1845, p. 163: Dequo responso interrogantes fuerunt multum
stupefacti [In this response, the interrogators were quite stupefied]
228. ^ Gies 1981, p. 206; Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 127–128; Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 256.
229. ^ Gies 1981, pp. 207–209; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 130.
230. ^ Castor 2015, p. 186; Lowell 1896, p. 318; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 129.
231. ^ Barstow 1986, pp. 115–116; Castor 2015, p. 190; Gies 1981, p. 212; Lucie-Smith
1976, p. 266; Sullivan 1999, p. 131.
232. ^ Lowell 1896, p. 324; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 130; Michelet 1855, p. 208.
233. ^ Gies 1981, pp. 213–214; Warner 1981, p. 140.
234. ^ Castor 2015, p. 190; Gies 1981, p. 214; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 131.
235. ^ Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 266; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 130; Rankin & Quintal 1964,
p. 113.
236. ^ Megivern 1997, p. 128.
237. ^ Noonan 1998, p. 703.
238. ^ Kelly 2014, p. 949; Noonan 1987, pp. 204–205.
239. ^ Noonan 1987, p. 203.
240. ^ Schibanoff 1996, p. 37; Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 271.
241. ^ Lightbody 1961, p. 138 fn3; Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 269.
242. ^ Hotchkiss 2000, pp. 64–65; Sackville-West 1936.
243. ^ Crane 1996, pp. 302–333; Gies 1981, p. 216; Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 273; Michelet
1855, p. 222.
244. ^ Hotchkiss 2000, p. 66; Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 272; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 132.
245. ^ Lowell 1896, p. 329; Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 273; Sackville-West 1936, pp. 332–333.
246. ^ Bullough 1974, p. 1389; Crane 1996, p. 302; Hobbins 2005, p. 24; Pernoud & Clin
1986, pp. 132–133; Sullivan 1999, pp. 132–133.
247. ^ Gies 1981, p. 217; Hobbins 2005, pp. 24–25; Sullivan 1999, pp. 138–139.
248. ^ Gies 1981, pp. 218–219; Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 134–135.
249. ^ Hobbins 2005, p. 198; Sackville-West 1936, pp. 337–338; Sullivan 1999,
p. 139; Taylor 2006, p. 222.
250. ^ Gies 1981, pp. 219–220; Lucie-Smith 1976, pp. 279–280; Michelet 1855, pp. 228–
229; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 134.
251. ^ Sullivan 1999, p. 148; Taylor 2006, p. 225.
252. ^ Gies 1981, p. 223; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 135; Sackville-West 1936, p. 341.
253. ^ Lucie-Smith 1976, pp. 281–282; Michelet 1855, pp. 228–229; Sackville-West 1936,
p. 341.
254. ^ Gies 1981, p. 223; Lowell 1896, p. 341; Michelet 1855, p. 238.
255. ^ Gies 1981, p. 223; Lucie-Smith 1976, pp. 282–283; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 136.
256. ^ Gies 1981, p. 223; Lowell 1896, p. 341; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 137.
257. ^ Allmand 1988, p. 57; Curry et al. 2015, p. 106; Fuller 1954, pp. 496–497.
258. ^ Allmand 1988, p. 57; Fuller 1954, p. 490; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 166.
259. ^ Barker 2009, p. 229.
260. ^ Barker 2009, p. 228; DeVries 1999, p. 186; Fuller 1954, p. 494.
261. ^ Allmand 1988, p. 36; Burne 1956, p. 342.
262. ^ Castor 2015, p. 230; Gies 1981, p. 231.
263. ^ Castor 2015, p. 224; Gies 1981, p. 230; Lightbody 1961, pp. 118–119; Vale 1974,
p. 62.
264. ^ Pernoud 1955, pp. 3–4; Warner 1981, p. 189.
265. ^ Gies 1981, p. 230; Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 149–155.
266. ^ Lightbody 1961, p. 121; Pernoud 1955, p. 318.
267. ^ Castor 2015, pp. 228–229; Lightbody 1961, p. 122; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 151.
268. ^ Castor 2015, pp. 228–229; Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 4.
270. ^ Lightbody 1961, pp. 122–123; Lowell 1896, pp. 350–351; Murray 1902,
p. 372; Warner 1981, p. 190.
272. ^ Lightbody 1961, p. 128; Lowell 1896, p. 350.
273. ^ Pernoud 1955, p. 37.
274. ^ Gies 1981, p. 235; Lightbody 1961, p. 122.
275. ^ Gies 1981, p. 124; Lowell 1896, p. 351; Murray 1902, p. 373.
276. ^ Gies 1981, p. 235; Lowell 1896, p. 351; Pernoud 1955, p. 37; Warner 1981, p. 190.
277. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 156.
278. ^ Gies 1981, p. 236; Lowell 1896, p. 355; Pernoud 1955, pp. 287–288.
279. ^ Castor 2015, p. 241; Gies 1981, p. 237; Pernoud 1962, p. 268.
280. ^ Bréhal 1456, pt I, ch. VIII (p. 104-105) : Unde, quatinus ille episcopus et alii in hoc
ei faventes se a malicia manifesta contra ecclesiam romanam , aut etiam ab heresi , se
debite excusare possent, non video. [How that bishop [Cauchon] and others who favored him
in this respect [that is, in continuing the trial] can excuse themselves from malice toward the
Roman Church, or even from heresy, I cannot see.]
281. ^ DeVries 1996, p. 3.
282. ^ Lightbody 1961, pp. 16–17; Warner 1981, pp. 4–6.
283. ^ Kennedy & Varty 1977, p. 1; Warner 1981, p. 25.
284. ^ Hamblin 2003, p. 209.
285. ^ Lightbody 1961, p. 118.
286. ^ Hamblin 2003, p. 217; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 243.
287. ^ Hamblin 1984, pp. 9–10.
288. ^ Hamblin 1984, p. 11.
289. ^ Hamblin 1988, pp. 63–64.
290. ^ Orléans 2021; Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 242–245; Warner 1981, p. 192.
291. ^ Taylor 2006, p. 350–352.
292. ^ Rankin & Quintal 1964, p. 3.
293. ^ Fraioli 2000, p. 56; Mackinnon 1902, p. 78; Wood 1988, p. 150.
294. ^ Lightbody 1961, p. 15; Mock 2011, p. 39.
295. ^ France 1909, pp. lix–lx.
296. ^ Warner 1981, p. 256.
297. ^ Conner 2004, p. 89; Guillemin 1970, p. 249.
298. ^ Guillemin 1970, p. 250; Matheson 2012, p. 444.
299. ^ Brown 2012, p. 450; Mock 2011, p. 144.
300. ^ Jordan & Caresse 2019, p. 61.
301. ^ Brown 2012, p. 449; Gaehtgens 2018, p. 45.
302. ^ Cohen 2014, p. 130.
303. ^ Brown 2012, p. 452; Cohen 2014, p. 130.
304. ^ Cohen 2014, p. 138; Dunn 2021, p. 62.
305. ^ Mock 2011, p. 220.
306. ^ Dunn 2021, p. 62.
307. ^ Gildea 1996, p. 165; Margolis 1996, p. 265.
308. ^ Brown 2012, p. 439; Mock 2011, p. 3.
309. ^ Mock 2011, p. 145.
310. ^ Gildea 1996, pp. 155–156; Warner 1981, pp. 311–312, fn 24.
311. ^ Taylor 2012, p. 238.
312. ^ Gildea 1996; Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 244–245; Taylor 2012, p. 238.
313. ^ Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 245; Taylor 2012, p. 240.
314. ^ Castor 2015, p. 244.
315. ^ Pius XI 1922, p. 187:Sanctam Ioannam Virginem Arcensem, uti Patronam minus
principalem Galliae, libentissime declaramus et constituimus [We most gladly declare and
appoint Saint Joan of Arc, the virgin, as the Secondary Patron Saint of France]
316. ^ Gies 1981, pp. 183, 221; Sullivan 1999, p. 141.
317. ^ Chenu 1990, p. 98; Ghezzi 1996; Sullivan 1996, p. 106 fn8; Warner 1981, p. 264.
318. ^ Sullivan 1999, p. 162.
319. ^ Lowell 1896, p. 842; Meltzer 2001, p. 192; Pernoud 1955, pp. 6, 252; Taylor 2006,
p. 29 fn86.
320. ^ Kelly 1996, p. 210; Michelet 1855, p. 249; McInerney 2003, pp. 210–211; Sullivan
1999, pp. 30–31.
321. ^ Kelly 1996, p. 210; Guillemin 1970, p. 249; Warner 1981, p. 268.
322. ^ Chenu 1990, pp. 98–99; Harrison, Swinny & Marvin 1920, p. 298.
323. ^ Boal 2005, p. 208.
324. ^ Fraioli 1981, pp. 811, 813–814.
325. ^ Dworkin 1987, pp. 104–105; Fraioli 1981, p. 817; Sproles 1996, p. 162; Taylor
2012, p. 217; Warner 1981, p. 216.
326. ^ Dworkin 1987, p. 104.
327. ^ Dworkin 1987, pp. 126–127; Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 30–31; Meltzer 2001, p. 94.
328. ^ Castor 2015, pp. 97, 168; Gies 1981, pp. 54, 154; Pernoud & Clin 1986, pp. 30–
31, 105.
329. ^ Barstow 1985, p. 29; Dworkin 1987, p. 118.
330. ^ Barstow 1986, p. 128.
331. ^ Sexsmith 1990, p. 129.
332. ^ Dunn 2021, p. 38.
333. ^ Lightbody 1961, pp. 16–17.
334. ^ Cohen 2014, p. 110.
335. ^ Gies 1981, pp. 24; Taylor 2006, pp. 13, 27.
336. ^ Gies 1981, p. 24; Sullivan 1996, p. 86; Weiskopf 1996, p. 127.
337. ^ Sullivan 1999, p. 32.
338. ^ Taylor 2006, p. 29.
339. ^ Gies 1981, p. 236; Lightbody 1961, p. 140; Warner 1981, p. 190.
340. ^ Pernoud 1955, p. 286.
341. ^ Kelly 1996, pp. 220–221.
342. ^ Henker 1984; Schildkrout 2017, §6.
343. ^ d'Orsi & Tinuper 2006; Foote-Smith & Bayne 1991; Nicastro & Fabienne 2016.
344. ^ Ratnasuriya 1986, p. 235.
345. ^ Sherman & Zimmerman 2008.
346. ^ Allen 1975.
347. ^ Mackowiak 2007, p. 140.
348. ^ Kelly 1996, p. 220.
349. ^ Henderson 1939, cited in Ratnasuriya 1986
350. ^ Sullivan 1996, pp. 104–105; Warner 1981, pp. 130–131.
351. ^ Huizinga 1959, pp. 223–224.
352. ^ Kelly 1996, p. 222.
353. ^ DeVries 1999, pp. 38–39; Gies 1981, p. 28; Henderson 1939, cited in Ratnasuriya
1986, p. 234; Schildkrout 2017, §8.
354. ^ Sullivan 1999, p. 140.
355. ^ Crane 2002, pp. 74; Fraioli 2000, p. 28, fn18.
356. ^ Crane 1996,
p. https://archive.org/details/performanceofsel0000cran/page/78 307; Schibanoff 1996,
pp. 42.
357. ^ Crane 1996, p. 307.
358. ^ Barrett 1932, p. 152.
359. ^ Hotchkiss 2000, p. 67; Warner 1981, p. 144.
360. ^ Sackville-West 1936, p. 91; Gies 1981, p. 36.
361. ^ Crane 1996, p. 298; Garber 1993, p. 216; Lucie-Smith 1976, p. 32; Warner 1981,
p. 144.
362. ^ Sullivan 2011, p. 316.
363. ^ Garber 1993, p. 215; Sackville-West 1936, pp. 26–27; Schibanoff 1996, p. 33.
364. ^ Hotchkiss 2000, p. 66; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 117; Schibanoff 1996, p. 31.
365. ^ Gies 1981, p. 217–218; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 132; Schibanoff 1996,
p. 31; Sullivan 1999, p. 132.
366. ^ Hotchkiss 2000, p. 67; Schibanoff 1996, p. 38.
367. ^ Hotchkiss 2000, p. 61.
368. ^ Aquinas 2022, ST II-II, a. 2, ad 3.
369. ^ Sackville-West 1936, p. 93; Schibanoff 1996, p. 41.
370. ^ Hotchkiss 2000, p. 66; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 132.
371. ^ Crane 1996, p. 301; Pernoud & Clin 1986, p. 184.
372. ^ Dworkin 1987, pp. 125–126; Gies 1981, p. 216; Hotchkiss 2000, p. 67; Sackville-
West 1936, pp. 301, 318.
373. ^ Hotchkiss 2000, p. 64–65; Schibanoff 1996, p. 58.
374. ^ Dworkin 1987, p. 126; Schibanoff 1996, p. 52.
375. ^ Bullough 1974; Crane 1996, p. 310; Sproles 1996, p. 163; Warner 1981, p. 147.
376. ^ Crane 2002, p. 78; Warner 1981, p. 142.
377. ^ Crane 1996, pp. 313; Garber 1993, p. 11; Warner 1981, p. 147.
378. ^ Crane 1996, pp. 305–306; Warner 1981, pp. 146–147.
379. ^ Monmarché 1958, p. 70: Tête casquée découverte en 1820 dans les démolitions
des restes de l'ancienne église Saint-Eloi-Saint-Maurice, considérée parfois, mais à tort,
comme représentant Jeanne d'Arc; c'est en réalité une tête de St Georges. [Helmeted head
discovered in 1820 in the demolished remains of the old Saint-Eloi-Saint-Maurice church,
sometimes incorrectly considered to represent Joan of Arc; it is actually a head of St.
George.]; Warner 1981, p. 176.
380. ^ Shaw 1932, p. 7.
381. ^ Butler 2007, p. 593; Charlier et al. 2010, pp. e14–e15.
382. ^ BBC 2016.
383. ^ Alberge 2015.
384. ^ Daley 2016; Willsher 2016.
385. ^ Willsher 2016.
386. ^ Brewer 1900, p. 683.
387. ^ Caze 1819, p. 124: "Si l'on veut en effet reconnaître que les révélations faites à
Jeanne d'Arc sur le Roi et sur Charles d'Orléans, ałors prisonnier en Angleterre, étaient de la
même nature, ... qu'ils étaient ses frères et qu'elle était leur soeur, la cause des délais
demandés par elle pour la manifestation du secret sur lequel les juges l'interrogeaient si
fréquemment, devient facile à concevoir." [If we want to recognize that the revelations made
to Joan of Arc about the King [Charles VII] and about Charles d'Orléans, then a prisoner in
England, were of the same nature, ... that they were her brothers and that she was their
sister, the cause of the delays requested by her for the manifestation of the secret about
which the judges [at her trial] questioned her so frequently, becomes easy to
imagine."]; Michaud-Fréjaville 2003, p. 13.
388. ^ Murray 1921, p. 271.
389. ^ Graeme 2009, p. 99.
Sources
Books
 Aberth, John (2000). From the Brink of the Apocalypse. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-92715-
4. OCLC 1054385441.
 Allmand, Christopher (1988). The Hundred Years War: England and France at War c.1300-c.
1450. Routledge. ISBN 9781139167789. OCLC 1285662551.
 Barker, Juliet (2009). Conquest: The English Kingdom of France, 1417-1450. Little,
Brown. ISBN 9781408702468. OCLC 903613803.
 Barstow, Anne Llewellyn (1986). Joan of Arc: Heretic, Mystic, Shaman. E.
Mellen. ISBN 9780889465329. OCLC 1244846182.
 Boal, Barbara (2005). "The Cao Dai and the Hoa Hao". In Partridge, Christopher
(ed.). Introduction to World Religions. Fortress. pp. 208–
209. ISBN 9780824510114. OCLC 645341461.
 Brewer, E. Cobham (1900). Dictionary of Phrase and Fable (New ed.). Cassell and
Company. OCLC 896665214.
 Burne, Alfred Higgins (1999) [1956]. The Agincourt War: A Milistary history of the Latter Part
of the Hundred Years War from 1369 to 1453. Wordsworth
Editions. ISBN 1840222115. OCLC 1285475585.
 Castor, Helen (2015). Joan of Arc: A History.
Harper. ISBN 9780062384393. OCLC 1256258941.
 Caze, Pierre (1819). La Verité sur Jeanne d'Arc ou éclaircissemens sur son origine [The
Truth about Joan of Arc or Clarification of Her Origins] (in French). Vol. I. Paris:
Rosa. OCLC 220208170.
 Champion, Pierre (1932) [1920]. "Essay on the Trial of Jeanne d'Arc, Dramatis Personae,
Biographical Sketches of the Trial Judges and Other Persons Involved in the Maid's Career,
Trial and Death". The Trial of Jeanne D'Arc. Translated by Taylor, Coley; Kerr, Ruth H.
Gotham house. OCLC 1314152. Archived from the original on 14 November 2014.
Retrieved 25 November 2021.
 Chenu, Bruno (1990). Book of Christian Martyrs.
Crossroad. ISBN 9780824510114. OCLC 645341461.
 Cohen, Paul A. (2014). History and Popular Memory. Columbia University
Press. ISBN 9780231537292. OCLC 964546561.
 Conner, Susan Punzel (2004). The Age of Napoleon.
Greenwood. ISBN 9780313320149. OCLC 56575944.
 Crane, Susan (2002). The Performance of Self: Ritual, Clothing, and Identity during the
Hundred Years War. University of Pennsylvania. ISBN 0812236580. OCLC 843080228.
 Curry, Anne; Hoskins, Peter; Richardson, Thom; Spencer, Dan (2015). The Agincourt
Companion: A Guide to the Legendary Battle and Warfare in the Medieval World. Andre
Deutch. ISBN 9780233004716. OCLC 921184232.
 DeVries, Kelly (1996). "A Woman as Leader of Men: Joan of Arc's Military Career". In
Wheeler, Bonnie; Wood, Charles T. (eds.). Fresh Verdicts on Joan of Arc. Garland. pp. 3–
18. ISBN 0815336640. OCLC 847627589.
 DeVries, Kelly (1999). Joan of Arc: A Military Leader. Sutton Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7509-
1805-3. OCLC 42957383.
 Dunn, Susan (2021). The Deaths of Louis XVI: Regicide and the French Political
Imagination. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691224916. OCLC 1235966126.
 Dworkin, Andrea (2007) [1987]. Intercourse. Basic
Books. ISBN 9780465017522. OCLC 1153284259.
 Fraioli, Deborah (2000). Joan of Arc: The Early Debate. Boydell Press. ISBN 978-0-85115-
880-8. OCLC 48680250.
 Fraioli, Deborah (2005). Joan of Arc and the Hundred Years War. Greenwood
Press. ISBN 0313324581. OCLC 1150093760.
 France, Anatole (1909). Jeanne d'Arc, Maid of Orleans, deliverer of France: Being the Story
of her Life, her Achievements, and her Death, as Attested on Oath and Set Forth in the
Original Documents. London: Heinemann. OCLC 862867781. Archived from the original on
14 June 2020. Retrieved 28 August 2020 – via Project Gutenberg.
 Fuller, John Frederick Charles (1954). A Military History of the Western World:From the
Earliest Times to the Battle of Lepanto. Vol. I. Funk & Wagnalls. OCLC 1150796947.
 Gaehtgens, Thomas (2018). Reims on Fire: War and Reconciliation Between France and
Germany. Getty Research Institute. ISBN 9781606065709. OCLC 1028601667.
 Garber, Marjorie B. (1993). Vested Interests: Cross-dressing and Cultural Anxiety. Harper
Collins. ISBN 0060975245. OCLC 1151664883.
 Gies, Frances (1981). Joan of Arc: The Legend and the Reality. Harper &
Row. ISBN 0690019424. OCLC 1204328346.
 Gildea, Robert (1996). The Past in French History. Yale University
Press. ISBN 9780300067118. OCLC 638739483.
 Goldstone, Nancy Bazelon (2012). The Maid and the Queen: The Secret History of Joan of
Arc. Viking. ISBN 9780670023332. OCLC 1150263570.
 Graeme, Donald (2009). Lies, Damned Lies, and History: A Catalogue of Historical Errors
and Misunderstandings. History Press. ISBN 9780752452333. OCLC 851997819.
 Guillemin, Henri (1973) [1970]. Joan, Maid of Orleans. Saturday Review
Press. ISBN 9781107013360. OCLC 1097164619.
 Hamblin, Vicki L. (2016) [2003]. "En L'honneur de la Pucelle:ritualizing Joan the Maid in
Fifteenth-Century Orléans". In Astell, Ann W.; Wheeler, Bonnie (eds.). Joan of Arc and
Spirituality. Palgrave. pp. 209–226. ISBN 9781137069542. OCLC 1083468869.
 Harrison, Frederic; Swinny, S. H.; Marvin, F. S., eds. (1920). The New Calendar of Great
Men: Biographies of the 559 Worthies of All Ages & Nations in the Positivist Calendar of
Auguste Comte. Macmillan and Co. OCLC 1049894322.
 Henderson, David Kennedy (1939). Psychopathic States. W. W. Norton. OCLC 912042868.
 Hobbins, Daniel (2005). "Introduction". In Hobbins, Daniel (ed.). The Trial of Joan of Arc.
Harvard University Press. pp. 1–32. ISBN 9780674038684. OCLC 1036902468.
 Hotchkiss, Valerie R. (2000). Clothes Make the Man: Female Cross Dressing in Medieval
Europe. Garland. ISBN 9780815337713. OCLC 980891132.
 Huizinga, Johan (1959). Men and Ideas: History, the Middle Ages, the Renaissance; Essays.
Meridian. OCLC 1036539966.
 Jordan, John; Caresse, Philippe (2019). French Armoured Cruisers: 1887–1932.
Seaforth. ISBN 9781526741189. OCLC 1112385464.
 Kelly, Henry Ansgar (1996). "Joan of Arc's Last Trial: The Attack of the Devil's Advocates". In
Wheeler, Bonnie; Wood, Charles T. (eds.). Fresh Verdicts on Joan of Arc. Garland. pp. 205–
236. ISBN 0815336640. OCLC 847627589.
 Lace, William W. (1994). The Hundreds' Year War. Lucent
Books. ISBN 1560062339. OCLC 1256248285.
 Lang, Andrew (1909). The Maid of France: Being the Story of the Life and Death of Jeanne
d'Arc. Longmans, Green. OCLC 697990421.
 Lightbody, Charles Wayland (1961). The Judgements of Joan: Joan of Arc, A Study in
Cultural History. Harvard University Press. OCLC 1150088435.
 Lowell, Francis Cabot (1896). Joan of Arc. Houghton Mifflin Co. OCLC 457671288.
 Lucie-Smith, Edward (1976). Joan of Arc. Allen
Lane. ISBN 0713908572. OCLC 1280740196.
 Mackinnon, James (1902). The Growth and Decline of the French Monarchy.
Longmans. OCLC 1017332942.
 Mackowiak, Philip A. (2007). Post Mortem: Solving History's Great Medical Mysteries.
American College of Physicians. ISBN 9781930513891. OCLC 1285753937.
 Maddox, Margaret Joan (2012). "Joan of Arc". In Matheson, Lister M. (ed.). Icons of the
Middle Ages: Rulers, Rebels, and Saints. Vol. 2. Greenwood. pp. 417–
450. ISBN 9780313340802. OCLC 728656735.
 Margolis, Nadia (1996). "The "Joan Phenomenon and the Right". In Wheeler, Bonnie; Wood,
Charles T. (eds.). Fresh Verdicts on Joan of Arc. Garland. pp. 265–
287. ISBN 0815336640. OCLC 847627589.
 Matheson, Lister (2012). Icons of the Middle Ages: Rulers, Writers, Rebels, and Saints.
Greenwood. ISBN 9781573567800. OCLC 991308245.
 McInerney, Maud Burnett (2003). Eloquent Virgins: The Rhetoric of Virginity from Thecla to
Joan of Arc. Chicago: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9781137064516. OCLC 1083464793.
 Megivern, James (1997). The Death Penalty: An Historical and Theological Survey. New
York: Paulist Press. ISBN 9780809104871. OCLC 1244600248.
 Meltzer, Francoise (2001). For Fear of the Fire: Joan of Arc and the Limits of Subjectivity.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-51982-1. OCLC 46240234.
 Mock, Steven (2011). Symbols of Defeat in the Construction of National Identity. Cambridge
University Press. ISBN 9781107013360. OCLC 1097164619.
 Monmarché, Georges (1958). Val de Loire: Maine, Orléanais, Touraine, Anjou [Loire Valley:
Maine, Orléanais, Touraine, Anjou]. Les guides bleus [The Blue Guides] (in French).
Toulouse: Hachette. OCLC 257163813.
 Michaud-Fréjaville, François (2003). "Person vs. Personage: Joan of Arc in Seventeenth-
Century France". In Goy-Blanquet, Dominique (ed.). Joan of Arc, a Saint for All Reasons:
Studies in Myth and Politics. London: Routledge. pp. 39–
58. ISBN 9780754633303. OCLC 974642249.
 Michelet, Jules (1900) [1855]. Joan of Arc, the Maid of Orleans. From Mitchelet's History of
France. Translated by Ketcham, Henry. New York: A. L. Burt. OCLC 1047498185.
 Murray, Margaret A (1921). The Witch-cult in Western Europe. Oxford University
Press. OCLC 1176037038.
 Murray, T. Douglas (1902). "Introductory Note to the Rehabilitation". In Murray, T. Douglas
(ed.). Jeanne D'Arc, Maid of Orleans, Deliverer of France, Being the Story of Her Life, Her
Achievements, and Her Death, As Attested on Oath and Set Forth in the Original Documents.
London: William Heinemann. pp. 371–376. Archived from the original on 29 June 2018 –
via Project Gutenberg.
 Pernoud, Régine (2007) [1955]. The Retrial of Joan of Arc; The Evidence at the Trial For Her
Rehabilitation 1450–1456. Translated by Cohen. San Francisco: Harcourt, Brace and
Company. ISBN 9781586171780. OCLC 1338471.
 Pernoud, Régine (1966) [1962]. Joan of Arc By Herself and Her Witnesses. Translated by
Hyams, Edward. New York: Stein and Day. OCLC 1035912459.
 Pernoud, Régine; Clin, Marie-Véronique (1999) [1986]. Wheeler, Bonnie (ed.). Joan of Arc:
Her Story. Translated by duQuesnay Adams, Jeremy. London: St. Martin's Press. ISBN 978-
0-312-21442-5. OCLC 1035889959.
 Peters, Edward (1989). Inquisition. Berkeley: University of California
Press. ISBN 9780520066304. OCLC 970384852.
 Rankin, Daniel; Quintal, Claire (1964). "Authors' Comments". In Rankin, Daniel; Quintal,
Claire (eds.). The First Biography of Joan of Arc with the Chronicle Record of a
Contemporary Account. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press. OCLC 1153286979.
 Richey, Stephen W. (2003). Joan of Arc: The Warrior Saint. Westport: Praeger. ISBN 978-0-
275-98103-7. OCLC 52030963.
 Russell, Jeffrey Burton (1972). Witchcraft in the Middle Ages. Ithaca: Cornell
University. ISBN 9780801406973. OCLC 1151774229.
 Russell, Preston (2014). Lights of Madness: In Search of Joan of Arc. Savannah, GA:
Frederic C. Beil, Pub. ISBN 9781499040562. OCLC 1124448651.
 Sackville-West, Victoria (1936). Saint Joan of Arc. New York: Athenium. OCLC 1151167808.
 Shaw, George Bernard (1991) [1932]. Saint Joan. Harlow:
Longman. ISBN 9780582077867. OCLC 1195035218.
 Schibanoff, Susan (1996). "True Lies: Transvestism and Idolatry in the Trial of Joan of Arc".
In Wheeler, Bonnie; Wood, Charles T. (eds.). Fresh Verdicts on Joan of Arc. New York:
Garland. pp. 31–60. ISBN 0815336640. OCLC 847627589.
 Seward, Desmond (1982). The Hundred Years War: the English in France. New York:
Athenium. ISBN 9780689706288. OCLC 1280811695.
 Sullivan, Karen (1996). ""I Do Not Name to You the Voice of St. Michael": the Identification of
Joan of Arc's Voices". In Wheeler, Bonnie; Wood, Charles T. (eds.). Fresh Verdicts on Joan
of Arc. New York: Garland. pp. 85–112. ISBN 0815336640. OCLC 847627589.
 Sullivan, Karen (1999). The Interrogation of Joan of Arc. Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota. ISBN 9780816689866. OCLC 236342924.
 Taylor, Craig, ed. (2006). Joan of Arc: La Pucelle (Selected Sources Translated and
Annotated). Manchester: Manchester University Press. ISBN 978-0-7190-6847-
8. OCLC 1150142464.
 Taylor, Larissa (2009). The Virgin Warrior: The Life and Death of Joan of Arc. Padstow: Yale
University Press. ISBN 9780300161298. OCLC 1059166401.
 Tuchman, Barbara (1982). A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous 14th Century. New York:
Knopf. ISBN 9780394400266. OCLC 1033665932.
 Vale, M. G. A. (1974). Charles VII. London: Eyre
Methuen. ISBN 0413280802. OCLC 1280787240.
 Verger, Jacques (1972). "The University of Paris at the End of the Hundred Years' War". In
Baldwin, Richard A.; Goldthwwaite, John W. (eds.). Universities in Politics: Case Studies
from the Late Middle Ages and Early Modern Period. Johns Hopkins Press. pp. 47–
78. ISBN 0801813727. OCLC 1151833089.
 Warner, Marina (1981). Joan of Arc: The Image of Female Heroism. New York:
Knopf. ISBN 9780394411453. OCLC 1150060458.
 Weiskopf, Steven (1996). "Readers of the Lost Arc: Secrecy, Specularity, and Speculation in
the Trial of Joan of Arc". In Wheeler, Bonnie; Wood, Charles T. (eds.). Fresh Verdicts on
Joan of Arc. New York: Garland. pp. 113–132. ISBN 0815336640. OCLC 847627589.
 Wood, Charles (1988). Joan of Arc and Richard III : Sex, Saints, and Government in the
Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198021094. OCLC 519442443.
Journal articles, dissertations, and theses

 Allen, Clifford (1975). "The schizophrenia of Joan of Arc" (PDF). History of Medicine
(London). 6 (3–4): 4–9. PMID 11630627. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28
December 2013.
 Barstow, Anne Llewellyn (1985). "Mystical experience as a feminist weapon: Joan of
Arc". Women's Studies Quarterly. 13 (2): 26–29. JSTOR 40003571. Archived from the
original on 25 January 2022. Retrieved 25 January 2022.
 Boyd, Beverly (1986). "Wyclif, Joan of Arc, and Margery Kempe". Mystics
Quarterly. 12 (3): 112–118. JSTOR 20716744. Archived from the original on 9
December 2021. Retrieved 9 December 2021.
 Brown, Frederick (2012). "The battle for Joan". The Hudson Review. 65 (3): 439–
452. JSTOR 43489248. Archived from the original on 17 December 2021. Retrieved 12
January 2022.
 Bullough, Vern L (1974). "Transvestites in the Middle Ages". American Journal of
Sociology. 79 (6): 1381–
1394. doi:10.1086/225706. JSTOR 2777140. PMID 12862078. S2CID 3466059. Archiv
ed from the original on 24 December 2021. Retrieved 28 December 2021.
 Butler, Declan (2007). "Joan of Arc's relics exposed as forgery". Nature. 446 (7136):
593. Bibcode:2007Natur.446..593B. doi:10.1038/446593a. PMID 17410145.
 Charlier, P.; Poupon, J.; Eb, A.; De Mazancourt, P.; Gilbert, T.; Huynh-Charlier, I.;
Loublier, Y.; Verhille, A. M.; Moulheirat, C.; Patou-Mathis, M.; Robbiola, L.; Montagut, R.;
Masson, F.; Etcheberry, A.; Brun, L.; Willerslev, E.; Lorin de la Grandmaison, G.;
Durigon, M. (2010). "The 'relics of Joan of Arc'" A forensic multidisciplinary
analysis". Forensic Science International. 194 (1–3): e9–
e15. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.09.006. PMID 19913375. Archived from the original on
21 February 2022. Retrieved 29 December 2021.ResearchGate: 38089351 Archived 21
February 2022 at the Wayback Machine
 Contamine, Philippe (2007). "Remarques critiques sur les étendards de Jeanne d'Arc
[Critical remarks on the banners of Joan of Arc]". Francia (in French). 34 (1): 187–
200. doi:10.11588/fr.2007.1.45032. Archived from the original on 7 May 2021.
Retrieved 7 May 2021.
 Crane, Susan (1996). "Clothing and gender definition: Joan of Arc" (PDF). Journal of
Medieval and Early Modern Studies. 26 (2): 298–320. JSTOR 43577195. Archived
from the original (PDF) on 5 July 2016.
 Egan, Brendan (2019). 'Bore by discent and by title of right, justly to reigne in England
and in Fraunce': Literature Directed at English Kings During the Hundred Years
War (PDF) (MA). University of Guelph.
 Elliot, Dyson (2002). "Seeing double: John Gerson, the discernment of spirits and Joan
of Arc". The American Historical Review. 107 (1): 26–
54. doi:10.1086/532095. JSTOR 10.1086/532095. Archived from the original on 22
 Foote-Smith, Elizabeth; Bayne, Lydia (1991). "Joan of Arc". Epilepsia. 32 (6): 810–
815. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1991.tb05537.x. PMID 1743152. S2CID 221736116.
 Fraioli, Deborah (1981). "The literary image of Joan of Arc: Prior
influences". Speculum. 56 (4): 811–
930. doi:10.2307/2847364. JSTOR 2847364. S2CID 161962500. Archived from the
 Frank, John P. (1997). "The trial of Joan of Arc". Litigation. 69 (5): 51–
54. JSTOR 29759909. Archived from the original on 23 December 2021. Retrieved 24
December 2021.
 Hamblin, Vicki L. (1984). The Fifteenth-century French Mistere du Siege D'Orléans: An
Annotated Edition (Portions in French Text) (PhD). University of Arizona. Archived from
the original on 8 January 2022. Retrieved 9 January 2022.
 Hamblin, Vicki L. (1988). "The Mistère du siège d'Orléans as a representational
drama". The Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature. 42 (1/2): 61–
 Henker, F. O. (1984). "Joan of Arc and DSM III". Southern Medical Journal. 77 (12):
1488–1490. doi:10.1097/00007611-198412000-00003. PMID 6390693. S2CID 445283
65.
 Hughes, J. R. (2005). "Did all those famous people really have epilepsy?". Epilepsy &
Behavior. 6 (2): 115–
39. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2004.11.011. PMID 15710295. S2CID 10436691.
 Kelly, Henry Ansgar (1993). "The right to remain silent: Before and after Joan of
Arc". Speculum. 68 (4): 992–
original on 24 December 2021. Retrieved 24 December 2021.
 Kelly, Henry Ansgar (2014). "Inquisitorial deviations and cover-ups: The prosecutions of
Margaret Porete and Guiard of Cressonessart, 1308–1310". Speculum. 89 (4): 936–
973. doi:10.1017/S003871341400164X. JSTOR 43577195. S2CID 170115473. Archive
d from the original on 27 December 2021. Retrieved 28 December 2021.
 Kennedy, Angus J.; Varty, Kenneth (1977). Introduction. Ditié de Jehanne D'Arc. By de
Pizan, Christine. Oxford: Society for the Study of Mediæval Languages and
Literature. ISBN 9780950595504. OCLC 1083468869. Archived from the original on 16
June 2008.
 Newhall, Richard A. (1934). "Payment to Pierre Cauchon for presiding at the trial of
Jeanne d'Arc". Speculum. 9 (1): 88–
original on 22 December 2021. Retrieved 24 December 2021.
 Nicastro, Nicholas; Fabienne, Picard (2016). "Joan o fArc: Sanctity, witchcraft or
epilepsy". Epilepsy & Behavior. 57 (Part B): 247–
 Noonan, John T. (1987). "Principled or pragmatic foundations for the freedom of
conscious?". Journal of Law and Religion. 5 (1): 203–
212. doi:10.2307/1051025. JSTOR 1051025. Archived from the original on 27
 Noonan, John T. (1998). "The Death Penalty. An historical and Theological Survey by
James T. Megivern". Book Review. The Catholic Historical Review. 84 (4): 703–
705. doi:10.1353/cat.1998.0239. JSTOR 25025339. S2CID 159923086. Archived from
the original on 26 December 2021. Retrieved 28 December 2021.
 Nores, J. M.; Yakovleff, Y. (1995). "A historical case of disseminated chronic
tuberculosis". Neuropsychobiology. 32 (2): 79–
80. doi:10.1159/000119218. PMID 7477805.
 d'Orsi, Giuseppe; Tinuper, Paolo (2006). ""I heard voices ...": from semiology, an
historical review, and a new hypothesis on the presumed epilepsy of Joan of
Arc". Epilepsy & Behavior. 9 (1): 152–
 Ratnasuriya, R. H. (1986). "Joan of Arc, creative psychopath: is ther another
explanation?". Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 79 (Part B): 247–
 Schildkrout, Barbara (2017). "Joan of Arc—Hearing voices". American Journal of
Psychiatry. 174 (12): 1153–
1154. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17080948. PMID 29191033.
 Sexsmith, Dennis (1990). "The Radicalization of Joan of Arc: Before and after the
French Revoluion". RACAR: Revue d'art canadienne/Canadian Art Review. 17 (2): 125–
130. doi:10.7202/1073071ar. JSTOR 42630458. Archived from the original on 24
January 2022. Retrieved 25 January 2022.
 Sherman, Larry R.; Zimmerman, Michael R. (2008). "Ergotism and its effects on society
and religion". Journal of Nutritional Immunology. 2 (3): 127–
136. doi:10.1300/J053v02n03_08.
 Sizer, Michael (2007). "The calamity of violence: Reading the Paris massacres of
1418". Journal of the Western Society for French History. 35: 19–39. OCLC 990058151.
Archived from the original on 24 February 2014.
 Sproles, Karyn Z (1996). "Cross-dressing for (imaginary) battle: Vita Sackville-West's
biography of Joan of Arc". Biography. 19 (2): 158–
177. doi:10.1353/bio.2010.0242. JSTOR 23539706. S2CID 161108684. Archived from
 Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers (2011). "Joan's two bodies: A study in political
anthropology". Social Research. 78 (2): 307–
324. doi:10.1353/sor.2011.0038. JSTOR 23347178. Archived from the original on 17
 Taylor, Larissa Juliet (2012). "Joan of Arc, the church, and the papacy". The Catholic
Historical Review. 98 (2): 217–
240. doi:10.1353/cat.2012.0129. JSTOR 23240136. S2CID 154958228. Archived from
Online sources
 Alberge, Dalya (27 December 2015). "Hot property: ring worn by Joan of Arc up for
auction". The Sunday Times. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016.
 "Joan of Arc ring returns to France after auction sale" . News. BBC. 4 March 2016.
Archived from the original on 5 March 2016.
 "The Calendar". The Church of England. 2021. Archived from the original on 9
March 2021.
 Daley, Jason (24 March 2016). "French theme park "battles" British government to
keep Joan of Arc's ring". Smithsonian Magazine. Archived from the original on 21
November 2021.
 "Bienvenue sur la site de Domremy-la-pucelle [Welcome to the Domremy-La-
Pucelle Website]". Domremy la Pucelle: village Natal de Jaenne d'Arc [Domremy La
Pucelle: Birth Village of Joan of Arc] (in French). 2021. Archived from the
original on 16 April 2021.
 Ghezzi, Burt (2021) [1996]. "Saint Joan of Arc, 1412–1431". Loyola Press. Archived
from the original on 14 January 2022.
 "History of Burgundy: The Glorious Age of the Dukes of Burgundy" . Burgundy
Today. 2012. Archived from the original on 30 April 2012.
 "Joan of Arc Celebrations". Metropolis of Orléans. 2021. Archived from the original
on 16 May 2021.
 Linder, Douglas O. (2017). "Joan of Arc's Abjuration (May 24, 1431)". Famous
Trials. Archived from the original on 2 July 2017.
 Willsher, Kim (26 August 2016). "Joan of Arc ring stays in France after appeal to
Queen". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 27 August 2016.
Primary sources
 Aquinas, Thomas. "Summa Theologiae". newadvent.org. Archived from the

original on 27 September 2018. Retrieved 25 January 2022.
 The Trial of Jeanne d'Arc. Translated by Barrett, Wilfred Philips. New York:
Gotham house. 1932. OCLC 1314152. Archived from the original on 18
August 2016.
 Benedict XV (2021) [1920]. "Divina Disponente". The Holy See. Archived
from the original on 25 February 2021.
 Bréhal, Jean (1893) [1456]. "Livre Quatrième: Texte de la Recollectio" [Book
Four: Text of the Recollectio]. Jean Bréhal, Grand Inquisiteur de France, et la
Réhabilitation of Jeanne D'Arc [Jean Bréhal, Grand Inquisitor of France, and
the Rehabilitation of Joan of Arc]. By Belon, Marie-Joseph; Balme, François (in
French and Latin). P. Lethielleux. OCLC 1143025136.
 Pius XI (1922). "Galliam, Ecclesiae filiam" [France, Daughter of the
Church]. Acta Apostolicae Sedia (in Latin). 14 (7): 185–187.
 de Pizan, Christine (1977) [1493]. "Christine de Pisan: Ditié de Jehanne
D'Arc". Jeanne dárc la pucelle. Translated by Kennedy, Angus J.; Varty,
Kenneth. Society for the Study of Mediæval Languages and
Literature. Archived from the original on 1 November 2020.
 Quicherat, Jules (1841a). Procès de condamnation et de réhabilitation de
Jeanne d'Arc, dite La Pucelle [The Trials of the Condemnation and
Rehabilitation of Joan of Arc, known as The Maid] (in Latin and French). Vol. I.
Renouard. OCLC 310772260.
 Quicherat, Jules (1841b). Procès de condamnation et de réhabilitation de
Rehabilitation of Joan of Arc, known as The Maid] (in Latin and French). Vol. II.
 Quicherat, Jules (1845). Procès de condamnation et de réhabilitation de
Rehabilitation of Joan of Arc, known as The Maid] (in Latin and French).
Vol. III. Renouard. OCLC 162464167.
Rehabilitation of Joan of Arc, known as The Maid] (in Latin and French).
Vol. IV. Renouard. OCLC 162464167.
Rehabilitation of Joan of Arc, known as The Maid] (in Latin and French). Vol. V.
 Rankin, Daniel; Quintal, Claire, eds. (c. 1500). The First Biography of Joan of
Arc with the Chronicle Record of a Contemporary
Account (PDF). OCLC 1153286979. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 July
2011.
External links
Joan of Arcat Wikipedia's sister projects
 Definitions from Wiktionary
 Media from Commons
 News from Wikinews
 Quotations from Wikiquote
 Texts from Wikisource
 Textbooks from Wikibooks
 Resources from Wikiversity
 Films about Jeanne d'Arc from International Joan of Arc

Society (with film clips)
 Centre Jeanne d'Arc at the Orleans Municipal Library (in
French)
 "The Siege of Orleans", BBC Radio 4 discussion with Anne
Curry, Malcolm Vale & Matthew Bennett (In Our Time, 24 May
2007)
show
Joan of Arc

Joan of Arc

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Joan of Arc

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Joan of Arc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Historiated initial depicting Joan of Arc from Archives

Domrémy, Duchy of Bar, Kingdom of France

Died 30 May 1431 (probably aged 19)

 (then under English rule)

Beatified 18 April 1909, Saint Peter's Basilica, Rome by Pope

Canonized 16 May 1920, Saint Peter's Basilica, Rome by Pope

Patronage France; martyrs; captives; military personnel; people

ridiculed for their piety; prisoners; soldiers, women

who have served in the WAVES (Women Accepted for

Joan of Arc (French: Jeanne d'Arc pronounced [ʒan daʁk]; c. 1412 – 30 May 1431) is

 1Birth and historical background

Birth and historical background

Controlled by Henry VI of England

Allegiance Kingdom of France

Conflict Hundred Years' War

Major battles and notable locations

[Interactive fullscreen map]

March to Reims and Siege of Paris

Campaign against Perrinet Gressard

Joan arrived at Orléans on 29 April 1429, meeting the commander Jean de Dunois,

Campaign against Perrinet Gressard

Joan was put on trial for heresy.[192] on 9 January 1431 at Rouen.[193] Joan's captors

Aftermath and rehabilitation trial

A 1903 engraving of Joan of Arc by Albert Lynch featured in the Figaro Illustré magazine

Joan of Arc statue in Orléans, by Denis Foyatier, 1855

Journal articles, dissertations, and theses

 Aquinas, Thomas. "Summa Theologiae". newadvent.org. Archived from the

 Films about Jeanne d'Arc from International Joan of Arc

You might also like