Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mariners Role in Collecting Evidence Handbook North of England Member
Mariners Role in Collecting Evidence Handbook North of England Member
THE MARINER’S
There are two main types of evidence: ‘factual
evidence’, which is what a witness actually
North of England P&I Association has
offices in the UK, Greece, Hong Kong, ROLE IN COLLECTING
EVIDENCE HANDBOOK
Japan and Singapore and is one of the
said or did or saw at the time of an incident and leading international mutual marine liability
‘opinion evidence’, which is what a witness insurers with over 120 million GT of entered
tonnage. Founded in 1860, the Association
thought about what happened. This handbook is has long recognised the importance of
about collecting and preserving factual evidence. providing practical loss prevention advice
It is intended to give guidance to mariners about to its members, believing this to be the most
effective way to reduce the number and scale
A GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICE
the different types of factual evidence relevant of claims. The Association has developed a
to the more common incidents and accidents on world-wide reputation for the quality and
board ships, helping them to collect and preserve diversity of its loss prevention initiatives,
which include this series of loss prevention
the very best evidence. Example lists of evidence guides co-authored with industry experts.
for the more common incidents are included in
each chapter. The lists provide comprehensive
guidance to the nature and extent of evidence that
may be required.
NORTH OF ENGLAND P&I ASSOCIATION
ISBN 978-0-9558257-6-7
THE MARINER’S
ROLE IN COLLECTING
EVIDENCE HANDBOOK
A GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICE
All rights reserved. No part of this publication, other than the evidence lists,
may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or
by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise)
without the written permission of the publisher.
ISBN 978-0-9558257-6-7
CONTENTS
Contents
Chapter Page
1. COLLECTING AND PRESERVING FACTUAL EVIDENCE 3
Why it is needed 4
Maintaining accurate records 4
Visual evidence 5
Making reports 6
Preserving evidence 7
INDEX 64
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
2. Use the ‘Full Acrobat Search’ button (or Ctrl+Shift+F) to search for all occurrences
of a word or phrase in the text (click ‘Arrange Windows’ to fit all on screen).
3. Click on text which refers to another part of the book to go there, use the Acrobat
‘return to previous page view’ button to go back.
4. Many words or phrases are linked to further information in other parts of the book
(cursor changes to a hand) – click to go there and use the Acrobat ‘return to previous
page view’ to go back.
5. Click on text which refers to another publication or organisation to go its website via
your browser. For IMO publications, enter the title into the IMO Publishing ‘Find
product’ box.
TERMS OF USE
This publication may be used solely by the Authorised User.
The Authorised User shall comprise any company or individual (or employees thereof) to
which North of England P&I Association has granted permission to use this publication.
Chapter 1
There are two main types of evidence: ‘factual evidence’, which is what a witness actually
said or did or saw at the time of an incident and ‘opinion evidence’, which is what a witness
thought about what happened.
This handbook is about collecting and preserving factual evidence. It is intended
to give guidance to mariners about the different types of factual evidence relevant to
the more common incidents and accidents on board ships, helping them to collect and
preserve the very best evidence.
Example lists of evidence for the more common incidents are included in the following
chapters. The lists are not exhaustive but, although all the evidence listed may not be
required on every occasion, they provide comprehensive guidance to the nature and extent
of evidence that may be required. The quantity and quality of the evidence required will
increase with the severity of the incident.
3
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
WHY IT IS NEEDED
The Mariner’s Role in Collecting Evidence Handbook
The most important reason for providing good factual evidence is to establish what
really happened. Once that it is known, it is relatively easy to work out what to do about
it – whether to
Sometimes there is a need to know who to blame for an incident but, in the majority of
cases, it is simply to know what happened so as to stop it happening again.
The best factual evidence speaks for itself, whether it is automatically recorded data
from the engine room or wheelhouse, photographs and samples of damaged cargo or a clear,
contemporary, statement of facts by witnesses.
Opinion evidence is more difficult to deal with because so much will depend on the
personality of the witness and their interest in the incident. Opinion evidence can often
contaminate otherwise excellent factual evidence because if the opinion is unnecessary, self-
serving or plain wrong, then questions will be raised about the factual evidence as well.
The golden rule in collecting evidence after an incident is: facts only – no opinion.
There is plenty of time to reach an opinion on what happened when all the facts are known.
Always remember that some incidents will need to be considered by many different
people, not all of whom will be familiar with shipboard life and operations. Evidence
will often be looked at by doctors, insurers, statisticians, civil servants, lawyers and
judges and they may need to be informed about the background to the incident
under investigation to understand it properly. This is one reason why it is advisable to
collect a lot of background evidence, such as log books, ship’s particulars, extracts from
operational and safety management systems, passports and certificates. Understanding
the importance of routinely collecting and maintaining good evidence will have three
benefits for mariners.
• It will help establish the facts, which will make investigations by surveyors, lawyers and
others faster and more accurate.
• It will help to avoid many smaller and more mundane claims – over time this will make
life easier for everyone and will save a lot of money.
• It will lead to an increased awareness of potential problems and hence greater care and
professionalism on board, making life safer for everyone.
4
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Section 11 of the ISM Code requires ship operators to establish and maintain
• ship’s certificates
• official log book
• deck log books
• engine log books
• crew details
• movement books
• stability information
• maintenance records
• cargo documentation
• oil and environmental records
• safety equipment and exercise records
• accident reports.
The importance of keeping these key records accurately cannot be overstated. Well-
maintained documents are themselves evidence of accuracy and good records will make the
collection of specific evidence and the investigation of any incident quicker and easier.
In many countries submitting an inaccurate record to a government official (even when
there has been no accident) is itself a serious offence that can lead to the detention of the
ship and even its crew.
Furthermore, deliberately falsified or altered records are easily identifiable. There are
many well-established forensic methods by which investigators can date and verify written,
photographic and physical evidence as well as identify any subsequent alterations.
Just one falsified or altered item of evidence will cast doubt on all other evidence.
The act of falsifying or altering evidence may also be a criminal act with potentially serious
consequences for the individuals involved. Never attempt to falsify or alter evidence.
VISUAL Evidence
‘One picture is worth ten thousand words’ is as true today as when it was written. Most
mobile phones and handheld devices now have a digital camera that can also take videos
and many ships have digital video cameras on board. These cameras can be a very useful
tool for collecting visual evidence of an incident and its consequences.
Digital photographs and/or video recordings can provide essential evidence but a number
of points must be remembered to ensure the images have the maximum evidential value.
Above all it is important for investigators to know exactly what the recording shows;
its context and scale must be clear. For example, a photograph of a hole in steel plating is
of little value as evidence if there is nothing to indicate the location of the hole within the
structure, the orientation of the structure, the size of the hole and when the image was
recorded.
The following points should be remembered.
5
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
• Photographs and videos should be taken as close to the time of the incident as possible
The Mariner’s Role in Collecting Evidence Handbook
Film cameras and sketches drawn at the time of the incident can also be used to provide
visual evidence.
mAKING Reports
Many different kinds of shipboard reports are needed – some are routine and others
are in response to specific incidents. Specific reports are required by the ship’s safety
management system and others are required by outside agencies such as flag or port state
inspectors, port authorities and investigators.
Written reports should be as short as possible and should always keep strictly to the
facts, with no opinion. A good technique is to attach any relevant record to the report, such
as a statement of facts or a computer printout, and then simply refer to it.
Some report forms ask for an opinion on how an incident happened or for an opinion on
how similar incidents might be avoided in future. These questions can only be answered
after a full investigation and they are often better answered by ship operators ashore
rather than by mariners, who may have been too closely involved. It is often better to say
something like, ‘to follow on completion of full inquiry,’ or, ‘refer to ship operators,’ rather than to
express an opinion based on incomplete knowledge.
6
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Legal privilege
The best way of asserting legal privilege over witness evidence is by making a formal,
written statement to a lawyer. Even then, other reports on the same incident that are
required, for example, under the safety management system, will not be privileged.
If a detailed report on an incident is required when a lawyer is not available, the report
should be confined to facts as much as possible and it should begin with the following
words:
‘Confidential report prepared only for the company’s legal advisors for the purpose of obtaining
legal, professional advice on pending, anticipated or threatened proceedings’.
These words should not be put on any report required by the safety management
system, by regulation or requested by a competent authority as they would serve no
purpose and may attract unnecessary suspicion.
PreservING Evidence
Every bit as important as collecting evidence is preserving it and keeping it safe.
Physical evidence, such as
• paper documents
• pieces of equipment
• damaged or replaced machinery parts
• cargo and bunker samples
needs to be kept safe and secure on board. All items of evidence, including documents,
should be clearly labelled and securely packaged.
A record should always be kept of what evidence was preserved and where it was
retained or sent. Where evidence is sent off the ship, whether to the ship operator, experts
or lawyers, it must be sent by the safest and most secure method possible and not just by
ordinary post. Original documents should always be copied first. If in any doubt, ship’s staff
should check with the ship operator’s office, which may ask for assistance from the P&I
club’s local correspondent.
Electronic evidence such as digital photographs or video should be downloaded to
proper storage devices such as memory sticks, compact disks or the ship’s computer
following the guidance above.
7
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Most ships are now fitted with different forms of voyage data recorders. It is essential
The Mariner’s Role in Collecting Evidence Handbook
that these records are saved by following the correct procedures from the manufacturer’s
instructions. This must be done as soon as possible because many systems store data for
as little as 12 hours, after which it is automatically deleted from the recording equipment.
It is vital that this evidence is saved, downloaded or recorded as soon as possible so that
it is not lost.
Always err on the side of caution and do not destroy or dispose of anything that might
be relevant. If in doubt, preserve the evidence until proper advice can be obtained on
whether it needs to be kept.
It is also important to bear in mind that relevant evidence will include not only formal
documents, such as log books, but also more informal records, for example rough and
scrap logs that may be used to write up a fair log. Scraps of paper and informal records are
relevant and must be kept. Often they will have particular importance because they were
contemporary.
Some ship’s staff keep notebooks in which they write things down during the course of
their work. These records are also very important and must be kept. Any notebooks which
are related to work are not considered private documents.
After any incident or accident, witnesses should make a signed and dated note of what
they saw as soon as possible while their memory is still fresh. This is easier than trying to
recall events later – sometimes much later – and it will be a great help if a formal statement
is ever needed.
Do not dispose of anything without getting advice first.
8
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Chapter 2
Every incident that requires investigation will involve the collection of ‘general evidence’
and ‘specific evidence’.
This chapter discusses the general evidence that is required in most investigations.
Chapters 3 to 7 discuss the additional, specific, evidence that will be required following
common shipboard incidents involving people, cargo, the ship, its equipment and operations.
The purpose of general evidence is threefold
• it puts the incident into context by giving an accurate picture of the ship – its
ownership, management, employment and the people who run it – as well what it was
doing at the time and in what environment
• it makes the specific evidence more complete by providing answers to a number of questions
that might arise, for example how many people were available to do a certain task
• it gives a picture of how well record-keeping is carried out on the particular ship –if the
general evidence is complete, up-to-date and accurate, it will reflect well on the crew
and the ship operator in any subsequent investigation.
The general evidence required for an investigation is listed in Table 1 on page 10.
9
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
The vast majority of general evidence will be included in the ship’s official papers and
/ or safety management system. It should include all, or the relevant parts, of the evidence
listed below.
10
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
11
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Incident details
The Mariner’s Role in Collecting Evidence Handbook
Date, time and summary of incident and subsequent consequences and actions.
Details of navigation at time of incident
• ship position
• course and speed, or mooring arrangements
• draughts.
Details of weather and sea conditions at time of incident
• direction and height of sea and swell
• state of tide and current
• visibility and light conditions
• precipitation
• air temperature
• sea temperature
• wind strength and direction
• barometric pressure
• photographs and/or video evidencing weather experienced.
Details of all individuals who were involved in the incident, including
• full name
• age
• position on board
• employer
• certificate of competency / licence
• grade
• date of issue
• issuing country / authority
• other certificates of competency held
• time spent on ship
• experience on similar ships
• experience on other types of ship
• experience in current rank
• experience in other ranks
• health and rest, including (where relevant)
• number of hours spent on duty on that day and the previous day
• number of hours sleep in the 96 hours prior to the incident
• any other factors that may have affected sleep
• whether smoker, and if so, quantity
• alcohol consumption in the previous 24 hours
• whether under prescribed medication
• any ingested non-prescribed drugs or medicines
• records of drug and alcohol tests.
Record of accounts written by witnesses of the facts they observed.
Photographs, videos and/or sketches of incident and/or results of incident, including
damage and/or injury.
Physical evidence and/or samples relating to incident.
Details of relevant communications with ship operator.
Details of relevant communications with authorities.
Details of relevant ship operator procedures and advice, such as fleet notices.
12
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Chapter 3
13
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Most safety management systems include an incident report form designed to cover all
types of incident, whether injury or illness, and all categories of individual – crew member,
supernumerary, passenger and third party. These persons are defined as follows.
• Crew – people who have ‘signed on’ in accordance with the ship’s articles. As a general
rule the ship’s crew will correspond to the numbers and positions detailed in the ship’s
safe-manning document issued by its flag state administration.
• Supernumeraries – people who sail with the ship but not under a crew contract or a
passenger ticket. Most supernumeraries fall into two main categories: families of crew,
and people who are on board for occasional work purposes, such as riding gangs or
personnel from the owner’s offices.
• Passengers – people travelling under a valid passenger ticket.
• Third parties – people who do not travel with the ship but are somehow affected by it,
including surveyors, port agents, superintendents and, most commonly, stevedores.
Although an effort should be made to answer all questions on the incident report form,
it is acceptable to leave some parts blank if they really are not relevant to the circumstances
of the incident. Where the ship’s standard form covers both illness and injury, make it clear
which is applicable.
Injured and ill people should be asked for as much information as possible including
their medical history, any allergies, details of any prescribed medication, changes in their
diet and any trips ashore. Colleagues, friends and family may be able to provide valuable
background information.
Master’s report
Some injury and illness incidents may warrant a separate master’s report but, if the
incident is serious, such reports should be prepared under professional advice if possible.
Reports should be an accurate factual record, avoiding guesswork, opinion and any
personal bias.
Personal injury
In the case of any injury the master should make an investigation as soon as practicable
to try and establish what happened. The master should always complete the safety
management system incident report form.
The flag state administration and / or the port authority may also require details of any
accident to be officially reported and will often have their own type of report form. Where
practicable these forms should be completed only in consultation with the ship operator
and, if necessary, after taking appropriate professional advice.
It is common for a workplace accident to include an element of lack of care by the injured
person or by the supervisors, for example the injured person may not have been wearing the
correct personal protective equipment. Under these circumstances great care should be taken
not to apportion blame for the incident and especially not to say that the injured person was
responsible. The best approach is to keep the incident report form strictly to the facts. For
example, it should accurately list and describe the clothing worn by the injured person without
14
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
saying that they were or were not wearing the correct personal protective equipment. If the
Illness
Most illnesses can be categorised as individual or environmental. The former is
personal to the individual, such as a heart condition, whereas the latter may be brought on
by something in the environment, such as tainted food or exposure to chemicals. Shipboard
illnesses can be very serious and, if contagious, there could be grave consequences, even
affecting the safety of the ship. By the time an illness has come to the attention of the
master, the patient may already have been suffering for some time.
Many crew members will have undergone a pre-employment medical before joining
and this should always be consulted, if available, as it should detail any pre-existing
condition and any medication the patient is taking.
Where a passenger or supernumerary is a child, particular care must be taken with
details of their age and any child vaccinations they have received.
Generally illness amongst third parties such as stevedores and other visitors to the ship
are less likely to be notified to the ship and will be taken care of ashore. However, serious
incidents can still occur to third parties on board, for example poisoning from fumigation
procedures, entry into enclosed spaces and handling of toxic materials. Such incidents
will require the same investigation, evidence and reporting as incidents involving crew or
passengers.
In addition to the general evidence listed in Table 1 (page 10), the specific evidence
to be collected and reported for an illness should include as much as possible of the
information detailed in Table 2 for personal injuries (page 18) as well as that listed in Table
3 on page 18.
Fatalities at sea
The evidence to be collected in the event of a fatality will depend on whether death
resulted from an illness or an injury. If it was from an illness which might be contagious, it
will be necessary to take advice on the appropriate handling and storage of the body.
Where a body is to be kept on board until it can be taken ashore, it is should be kept
in a suitable cool room. A temperature of 4ºC is recommended; any colder and there is a
risk of frost damage to the internal organs, which will make it difficult to perform a proper
post mortem examination.
15
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Disciplinary action
The Mariner’s Role in Collecting Evidence Handbook
The role of a master includes maintaining order on board and this may result in having
to warn crew members or other people on board about their conduct, which may range
from a minor misdemeanour to serious misconduct endangering the ship and those aboard.
The majority of ship operators will have formal disciplinary procedures in place,
generally following flag state requirements, and the master should be familiar with these.
What can start as an apparently minor matter can sometimes escalate and, therefore,
however informal the first warning may be, it must be formally and accurately recorded.
The specific evidence to collect and report for a disciplinary incident, in addition to the
general evidence listed in Table 1 (page 10), is listed in Table 4 on page 19.
industrial action
Labour disputes can arise between workers and their employers. If they cannot be
resolved, resulting industrial action may affect ship operations.
Although uncommon, there is the possibility that a master may face some form of labour
dispute on board. These disputes normally relate to terms of employment, employment of
different nationalities under different terms, conditions on board, allocation of duties and
disciplinary issues.
Industrial action ashore can also affect the ship. This is most likely to involve strike
action by stevedores, but there are other shore workers who can cause ship operations to be
delayed if they are engaged in some form of dispute – even where the ship is not directly
involved. As this might result in difficulties later, for example with charterers or cargo
interests, it is appropriate to keep a proper record.
The specific evidence to collect and report in the event of industrial action, in addition
to the general evidence listed in Table 1 (page 10), is listed in Table 5 on page 19.
Stowaways
A stowaway is someone who tries to sail with a ship without the master’s permission,
generally by hiding on board. Considerable ingenuity is often shown by stowaways and
nowhere can be discounted as a possible hiding space when organising a stowaway search.
Some stowaways may come aboard with the cargo, often with the help of local shore staff
such as stevedores, and are often found in containers.
Under the International Ship and Port Security (ISPS) Code, ship operators must keep
details of everyone who is on board their ships and have procedures in place to support
these records. Although ports have similar obligations, the very presence of stowaways on
board a ship may be a non-conformity under the ISPS Code, which may cause problems for
the ship at future ports.
The costs of dealing with a stowaway can be surprisingly high and, although the
ship is likely to be responsible for arranging their eventual removal, if it can be clearly
demonstrated that the stowaways boarded with the cargo it may be possible to recover
costs from the charterer. It is important therefore to have as much evidence as possible
on how the stowaways got on board as well as evidence demonstrating that the ship made
every effort to prevent stowaways boarding and to find any stowaways who succeeded in
hiding on board.
16
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
The specific evidence to collect and report in addition in the event of stowaways being
PEOPLE In Distress
Any ship may encounter people in distress, whether by chance or because the ship has
been tasked by a search and rescue authority. Distressed people may come from a ship that
has sunk but they may also be migrants or refugees.
The specific evidence to collect and report in the event of rescuing people in distress,
in addition to the general evidence listed in Table 1 (page 10), is listed in Table 7 on
page 22.
The situation will vary depending on the circumstances but, once people are on
board, it is likely to be very similar to that for stowaways. Immigration authorities may be
helpful and automatically make all necessary arrangements for disembarkation and possible
repatriation, but this is not always the case. It is sensible for the master to collect similar
evidence as in the case of stowaways.
17
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
In addition to the general evidence listed in Table 1 (page 10), evidence for incidents
involving people should include the relevant parts of evidence listed below.
18
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
If equipment was involved, for example breathing apparatus, full details of its
19
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Shore disputes
The Mariner’s Role in Collecting Evidence Handbook
Record of any advice received in relation to any industrial action which may affect ship
operations, detailing the individuals with whom there have been exchanges, dates and times.
If action has been taken to minimise any potential cargo claims resulting from the dispute,
this should be fully recorded. The ship’s agent or the ship operator’s P&I club correspondent
should be able to assist with information on local conditions, strikes, labour disputes and so on.
Official notices – there may be official notices from the port or other shore side parties,
and it may also be helpful to take cuttings of local press reports.
20
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
• date of birth
21
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
22
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Chapter 4
To defend a cargo claim, a carrier must show that it has fulfilled its obligations under the
contract of carriage. Generally, this means proving the ship was seaworthy and the cargo was
properly cared for during the voyage.
Seaworthiness
A seaworthy ship can take its cargo to sea without risk of damage. Ships must be in
good condition and have everything they require to perform a voyage properly. This is more
than the integrity of a ship’s hull and machinery – it must also be properly equipped and
manned with a competent crew who are well trained in all shipboard procedures.
The Hague and Hague-Visby Rules, which are the principal international conventions
relating to the carriage of goods by sea, require carriers to exercise due diligence to make
ships seaworthy before they put to sea. A good test for compliance is to ask: ‘Would a
seaworthiness problem have come to light by carefully checking the ship before the voyage
23
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
and, if so, would a careful owner have resolved that problem before sending the ship and
The Mariner’s Role in Collecting Evidence Handbook
Care of Cargo
In addition to an obligation to make ships seaworthy, the Hague and Hague-Visby Rules
require carriers to care for a cargo from the time it is entrusted to them until it is delivered
to a receiver. If a cargo is lost or damaged at the time of delivery, carriers will have to explain
how the loss or damage occurred.
Carriers must perform voyages as described in a contract of carriage. Under the Hague
and Hague-Visby Rules, carriers are obliged to carry a cargo directly to its destination unless
there is an agreement to the contrary.
The route of a voyage is crucial. Any unjustifiable deviation from an agreed, direct
or customary route will be a breach of the contract of carriage and may prejudice a ship
owner’s P&I insurance cover.
The duration of a voyage may also be crucial as any unnecessary delay will be treated
in the same way as a deviation from the contractual voyage.
Cargo Responsibility
It is important to recognise there are likely to be at least two contracts of carriage
involved in any shipment of cargo. Firstly there is a contract of carriage evidenced by a bill
of lading. This contract is between the cargo owner and the carrier. Under most bills of
lading, the carrier is likely to be the shipowner.
There may also be a charterparty between the shipowner and a charterer. The ‘cargo
responsibility clause’ of the charterparty will show whether the shipowner or charterer
is responsible for loading, stowing and discharging cargo. This is important because the
nominated party will usually bear ultimate responsibility for any cargo claims arising during
the course of loading and discharge. If masters are uncertain who has responsibility for cargo
operations, they should contact the ship operator for instructions and guidance.
Bill of lading
Documents that evidence the quantity and condition of cargo carried on a ship are
essential – and the bill of lading is the most important of these. The Hague and Hague-
Visby Rules provide for the bill of lading to record the quantity of cargo and its apparent
order and condition at the time it is entrusted to the carrier. If bills of lading are inaccurate,
the consequences can be extremely costly for the carrier. It is therefore essential that all
information on the face of a bill of lading is checked carefully.
Carriers are under an obligation to verify the quantity of cargo and its condition and
identifying marks at the time it comes into their custody and care. Masters should ensure
proper arrangements are made for this and should seek clarification from the ship operator
if there is any doubt.
24
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Masters should not state anything in the bill of lading which they believe to be
Charterparty
There may be a chain of charterparties and they may be of different types, for example
time charterparties and voyage charterparties. One of them, usually the last in the chain,
will be the governing charterparty.
Both the charterparty and bills of lading may be relevant and, in the event of a cargo
claim, the master and ship operator may have to show that they complied with both.
25
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
In addition to the general evidence listed in Table 1 (page 10), evidence for incidents
involving cargo should include the relevant parts of evidence listed below.
26
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Record of actual depths at the terminal and tidal levels during ship’s port call.
27
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Discharge port
The Mariner’s Role in Collecting Evidence Handbook
28
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
29
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
30
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
31
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Running time sheets indicating stoppages or deviation from pre-agreed and planned operation.
The Mariner’s Role in Collecting Evidence Handbook
32
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
33
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
34
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Chapter 5
Ship-related incidents – ranging from sea and air pollution to collisions and groundings
– often involve significant sums of money and are likely to involve hull and machinery
(property) and P&I (liability) insurers as well as third parties. The ship operator will need
to collect evidence for insurance claims as well as evidence to bring and to defend third
party claims.
Several different incidents may flow from one casualty. For example, after a collision
there may be injured people, damaged cargo, a spill of fuel oil and a salvage operation. The
various chapters of this guide can be used to identify all the different types of evidence
likely to be required.
All major claims are likely to initiate a number of different internal and external
investigations, very likely involving surveyors, lawyers, classification society, coastal and flag
state administrators. There may even be criminal proceedings.
35
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Pollution
The Mariner’s Role in Collecting Evidence Handbook
Pollution is often taken to mean oil pollution of the sea. However, other forms of
environmental pollution are becoming as important as oil pollution and these include
Major pollution incidents are rare but they have such a far-reaching effect on the
environment and on international opinion that most countries now deal severely with ships
which discharge even small quantities of pollutant within their waters.
The IMO Code for the Investigation of Marine Casualties and Incidents categorises
‘severe pollution’ as a ‘very serious casualty’ and all other pollution (regardless of quantity)
as a ‘serious casualty’. Any pollution incident is likely to be investigated by the flag and
coastal states involved.
Under the principle ‘the polluter pays’, the owner and insurer of a ship which causes
pollution will almost certainly pay for the consequences, whether or not the master or crew
were in any way to blame. Sometimes other parties may contribute, for example the other
ship involved in a collision.
In pollution cases evidence is needed to
Oil pollution
The main sources of oil pollution are from routine operations, such as cargo and bunker
operations, and from marine casualties, including collisions and groundings.
The ship’s oil record book is a particularly important piece of evidence which will be
examined closely following any oil pollution incident. The requirements for completing
and maintaining the oil record book are set out in annex 1 of the International Convention
for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL).
It is very important that the oil record book is kept up to date. The entries in the oil
record book must be correct and accurate. If it is even suspected that the oil record book
contains inaccurate or wrong information, this can cause considerable problems for the ship
operator as well as the crew. In some countries submitting inaccurate records carries the
same penalties as pollution itself.
The oil record book should be completed on each occasion, on a tank-by-tank basis if
appropriate, whenever relevant operations take place in the ship.
36
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Harmful substances are dealt with under annex III of MARPOL and are those
Sewage pollution
The requirements for sewage pollution prevention and control are set out in annex IV of
MARPOL. Depending upon the arrangements which have been approved for the ship, it is
likely that sewage will have to be treated on board and only be discharged in specific areas.
Garbage pollution
Pollution includes uncontrolled, unauthorised and indiscriminate dumping of garbage.
Where, when and if garbage can be discharged are set out in detail in annex V of
MARPOL.
Air pollution
The most important evidence in respect of air pollution by engine exhaust gases
concerns the ship’s bunkers. Under annex VI of MARPOL the sulphur content of any
marine fuel must not exceed specified amounts.
MARPOL annex VI also allows certain areas are to be designated as emission control
areas (ECA) in which the sulphur content of any fuel must be even lower. The Baltic Sea,
North Sea and English Channel were among the first ECAs and more will follow.
Some countries have not implemented MARPOL annex VI but have established local
regulations for their territorial seas and adjacent waters. Within ports, air pollution may also
be subject to local, regional or national regulations. Managers, charterers or ship’s agents
should advise on any local requirements in good time for preparations to be made.
37
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Collision generally means a physical contact between two or more seagoing ships. It
does not matter whether they are underway, not under command, at anchor or alongside.
Damage to property other than a ship, such as a berth, pier, navigational aid, crane or
gantry, is often referred to as damage to fixed and floating objects (FFO).
Damage caused by a ship to third party property can often give rise to large claims which
ship operators have great difficulty defending. If damage occurs when the ship is leaving a
port, the master should resist any temptation to ignore the incident in the hope that the
damage will be minimal and there were no witnesses. Ship operators should be notified as
soon as possible so that enquiries may be made to ascertain the extent of the damage.
Occasions arise where a ship has to moor to property which has already suffered damage
or is in poor condition. In such cases the master should draw the attention of the berth
operator or port authorities to any deficiencies, note details of the damage in the log,
supported with sketches and photographs.
As many incidents occur under pilotage or in congested waters, the master should
ensure that proper watch keeping continues while the ship is under pilotage. Particular
care should be taken to plot the ship’s location on the chart, even in narrow channels, for
example by marking the times and distances off passing buoys.
Non-contact damage
Sometimes ships may cause damage without physical contact. The most usual scenario is
wash damage, with one ship travelling along a river or canal, perhaps at excessive speed, where
the wash causes ranging damage to a moored ship. In extreme cases moorings may break.
In non-contact incidents it is often the case that the passing ship was not aware it had
caused any damage. It is also possible that the ship suffering damage did not obtain details
of the passing ship but, by noting the time of the incident, it is often possible to identify
the offending ship. Another example of non-contact damage is where one ship hampers
another ship in its manoeuvres, which results in the other ship grounding, colliding with a
third ship or contacting some object.
38
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Evidence on the cause and effect of grounding, stranding or sinking incidents will be
• insurance claims
• wreck removal orders and environmental claims from the coastal state if the ship is a
hazard to navigation and / or a pollution risk
• flag state investigation.
In addition to the general evidence listed in Table 1 (page 10), the specific evidence
should include that listed in Table 15 on page 48.
39
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
After most salvage operations, the owner and insurer of the salved property will also
The Mariner’s Role in Collecting Evidence Handbook
engage specialist lawyers and surveyors to investigate the circumstances of the salvage
operation and to assess the likely reward. These experts may also investigate the original
cause of the problem but, with regard to the salvage, are only concerned by the dangers of
the situation and the efforts made to avoid or minimise those dangers. The investigators
will always want to examine any ‘self-help’ by crew and passengers because many dangers
are avoided by self-help before the professional salvors can get on-site.
The specific evidence to collect and report in the event of a salvage or general incident,
in addition to the general evidence listed in Table 1 (page 10), is as listed in Table 16 on
page 49.
40
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
41
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
42
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Details of crew member in charge of the collection, containment, segregation and disposal
43
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Data recorders
Details of ship operator’s procedures for collecting voyage data recorder (VDR) data.
Data from VDR systems.
• Data recorded from radar systems, automatic identification systems (AIS) and engine
and course loggers.
• It is essential that these records are saved by following the correct procedures from
the manufacturer’s instructions. This must be done as soon as possible because many
systems store data for as little as 24 hours, after which it is automatically deleted from the
recording equipment.
Data from telegraph recorders.
Data from course recorders.
Data from depth recorders.
Navigation records
Voyage plan.
Deck logs (fair and rough). Details of safety management system procedures including
• bridge watch-keeping and bridge team management
• navigation in coastal waters
• passage planning
• calling the master
• duties of the master
• duties of the watchkeeping officer.
Details of ship operator’s navigational bridge procedures.
Master’s standing orders (signed by all deck officers).
Master’s night orders.
Record of hours of work / rest of master and watch-keepers.
Record of ship’s watch system.
Navigational charts
• charts must be left precisely as plotted. Positions which do not match or other marks
must not be erased
• record of the exact time and position of the incident should be plotted, ideally using a
variety of methods (GPS, radar range and bearing, visual bearings etc.).
Chart correction record.
Record of ECDIS certification.
Compass record book.
Movement books
• records should be kept in ink, and any essential alterations made in ink, signed and dated
by the person making the alteration, and with deletions made with a single line, leaving
the writing underneath legible (no correction fluid)
Manoeuvring records (see above).
Details of personnel on bridge immediately before incident and their duties.
Records of radars in use and what range scales they were set on.
Details of position fixing system(s) in use and intervals between fixes.
Record of steering gear status including
• automatic or manual mode
• number of steering motors operating.
44
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
45
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
• times
• distance and bearing.
Details of other lights and shapes (if any) that were subsequently seen before the collision.
Details of steps taken to plot other ship, such as formal plot.
Record of actions of both ships including times up to the time of collision (including engine
movement).
Record of sound signals made and heard – with times.
Details of any communications between ships before collision, such as light signals or VHF
communications.
Details of any vessel traffic services (VTS) involvement.
Record of time of collision – with accuracy of the clocks on the bridge and in the engine
room verified along with accuracy of watches of witnesses and accuracy of automatic
recorders such as course recorders, telegraph loggers and data loggers.
Position of collision (state how obtained).
Details of speed and angle of blow – witness’ records of the ship’s speed and heading at
the moment of impact and the relative angle between the ships, supported by photographs
or drawings.
Details of which parts of each ship first came into contact.
Record of heading of own ship at time of collision – it is important that the course recorder
is marked in ink to indicate the time when the ship collided, although care should be taken
not to spoil the trace. If a course recorder is not available, the heading of the ship should be
determined by some other method which also should be recorded.
Record of draught of own ship at time of collision.
Record of action taken after collision
• description of movements of both ships after collision
• details of communications after collision
• details of other ships in vicinity when collision occurred
• record of communications with other ships in vicinity
Collision with moored or anchored ships
Details of whether ship was operating main engine(s).
Detailed description of the moorings of all ships involved.
Details of whether own ship was dragging anchor.
Details of whether other ship was dragging anchor.
Details of other ships dragging anchor in the vicinity at the time of the incident.
Damage to property
Full details of the object damaged
• whether the damaged object was old or new
• whether it was well used
• whether it was well illuminated and marked
• whether there were any signs of damage or defects to the object other than that caused
by the ship.
Details of the ship’s manoeuvres
Voyage plan (berth to berth), including full tidal data.
Details of any VTS involvement.
46
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
47
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
• independent or employed
• training and qualifications
• workloads and rotas
• summary of local law on the liability of pilots and port authority
• details of pilotage terms and conditions.
Non-contact damage
Port movement records.
Details of all other ships manoeuvring in the vicinity.
Details of whether the other ship contributed to the incident, such as testing main engines.
Details of any moorings, including fenders – were they defective, slack or ineffective in any way.
48
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
49
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Chapter 6
The Mariner’s Role in Collecting Evidence Handbook
Hull and machinery (H&M) insurance provides insurance cover for physical damage to
the ship itself (hull) and the equipment on board (machinery) – including the main and
auxiliary engines, cargo handling gear and navigation equipment.
The insurance may also provide cover for the consequences of hull and machinery damage,
including stoppage, delay and impairment of the ships’ efficiency, as well as cover for contributions
to general average and salvage and part of liability for collision damage to another ship.
Causes of hull and machinery damage include collisions and groundings, for which
additional evidence is required as set out in Chapter 5.
Fire is another possible cause: if the fire is serious, a fire expert will probably be
appointed by the ship operator as soon as possible to determine the cause of the fire and
possibly advise on fire-fighting methods. The master should ensure that the area where the
fire started is disturbed as little as possible.
The specific evidence to collect and report in hull and machinery damage incidents,
in addition to the general evidence listed in Table 1 (page 10), is as listed in Table 17 on
page 51.
50
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
51
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
• equipment manuals
• manufacturers recommendations
• procedures
• details of overhaul, survey or inspection
• record of usage
• record of filter changes.
Record of quotations, actual costs, disbursements, port costs, crew costs, overtime paid,
spare parts used, currency exchange rates used, off-hire periods.
Record of H&M insurer’s agreement to repairs.
Classification society records.
Survey reports made by classification society, surveyors and superintendents during
temporary and permanent repairs.
Stoppage or delay
Deck and engine log books covering the period of the incident.
Record of fuel remaining on board at the beginning and end of the stoppage.
Details of any diversion caused by the incident.
Details of tow arrangements, including
• positions of start and finish
• the makeup of tow lines and connections
• whether ship or tug’s gear used
• tugs employed
• distances towed and to go
• speed and course made good
• weather conditions.
Reports or confirmation of class by classification society surveyor.
Statement of facts from port agent.
Details of all shore assistance provided that it is attributable to damage.
Record of all surveyors who have attended the ship with full details of the organisation
they represent.
Record of communications and copies of messages sent or received, particularly those
directed to time charterer dealing with diversion and off-hire times.
Impairment of ship’s efficiency
Details of additional time taken.
Details of additional fuel used.
Details of the extra labour and equipment used and a record of times when they were
used.
Record of communications and copies of messages sent or received, particularly those
directed to port agent, charterer or other third party.
52
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Fire
53
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Chapter 7
The Mariner’s Role in Collecting Evidence Handbook
This chapter looks at the commercial disputes that can arise in connection with the
ownership and operation of a ship. These disputes can be particularly costly for a ship
operator and, in contrast to P&I and hull and machinery incidents, it is the ship operator’s
own money that is at stake.
There are many different types of commercial and contractual disputes, ranging from
new building warranty issues to disputes over performance and bunkers. Many claims arise
after the events in question have occurred and often the crew will not even be aware there
is a problem, let alone be able to obtain or preserve contemporaneous evidence.
Much relevant evidence will be in the routine ship’s records, for example in deck and
engine logs, notes of protests, reports to ship operators’ offices and documents required by
the safety management system.
If in any doubt, the ship’s staff should consult the ship operator’s office so that shore
staff can obtain guidance. It is always better to assume that a dispute may arise and collect
the best evidence without delay.
54
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
• Delays relating to the availability of the berth – the most common reason a berth will
not be available is congestion. The reasons for congestion vary, from simply too many
ships to extraordinary congestion as a result of a strike, go-slow or political unrest.
Congestion always gives rise to disputes and evidence can be difficult to obtain after
the event.
• Delays relating to the accessibility of the berth – the reasons a ship might not be able
to access a berth might include a temporary obstruction, natural or man-induced, such
as lack of water, bad weather or strikes of pilots. It may also be because the ship or
the berth has been mis-described in the charterparty or because someone has made a
mistake.
• Delays upon reaching berth – it is not uncommon for cargo operations to be interrupted
upon reaching berth, often this is due to cargo related issues (see below).
The specific evidence to collect and report in the event of port delay dispute, in
addition to the general evidence listed in Table 1 (page 10), is as listed in Table 19 on
page 59.
55
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Performance DISPUTES
The Mariner’s Role in Collecting Evidence Handbook
Almost all charterparties will state the speed a ship is capable of steaming in loaded
and ballast conditions and its fuel oil consumption. There will also usually be a statement
of the ship’s in-port consumption. The statement will usually be qualified to apply only
to ‘good weather conditions’, which are usually defined by reference to wind and sea state
conditions and, sometimes, ocean currents.
Charterers or sub-charterers will often employ a weather routeing company to
monitor the ship’s performance on each sea leg. Based on this monitoring, claims for
under-performance of a ship are commonly brought at the end of the charterparty. Under-
performance claims for speed usually go hand-in-hand with claims for over-consumption of
fuel. Defence of such claims requires accurate and comprehensive data to be collected by
the ship.
In some circumstances masters may decide to divert from an advised route, for example
if a suggested passage is near to waters subject to piracy incidents. This in turn may result
in a longer passage and additional fuel consumption. The resulting routeing report may
conclude that the ship under-performed and the charterer will then consider a claim
against the owner. It is important that masters are able to justify their decision.
Under English law masters have an overriding duty to ensure the safety of the ship, crew
and cargo and are entitled to use their discretion to take such steps as necessary to ensure
this duty is safeguarded. Whether or not the steps are reasonable is an objective test.
56
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
deciding upon their route between ports. Masters have to comply with the directions of the
It will not be immediately apparent whether an owner can claim for breach of a safe
port / berth warranty. Therefore, whenever damage occurs to a ship on the approach to, or
departure from, a port (for example during the river channel voyage to or from the port), or
while in port or on the berth, it is important to gather as much evidence as possible to assist
the owner. It is better to collect too much evidence rather than not enough.
The specific evidence to collect and report in the event of an unsafe port or berth
incident, in addition to the general evidence listed in Table 1 (page 10), is as listed in
Table 21 on page 61.
57
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Bunker Disputes
The Mariner’s Role in Collecting Evidence Handbook
Quantity
Disputes over the amount of fuel supplied can arise either by innocent mistake or
where a supplier deliberately short supplies the ship, for example by blowing air through
delivery hoses to froth up the fuel – the so called ‘cappuccino effect’.
It is very important that the ship’s officers follow correct procedures, methodically
taking tank measurements and carefully calculating volumes to identify any quantity
discrepancy at the time the supply is made, particularly where the supplier is insisting on
its quantity figure(s) being inserted into the bunker delivery note. There will otherwise be
a lack of contemporaneous evidence in support of the ship operator’s position.
Where chief engineers are unable to verify their calculations with the supplier, then
the ship’s figure(s) should be inserted into the bunker delivery note or receipt. Where that
is not possible, a letter of protest should be immediately issued by the ship, alleging the
discrepancy in the quantity of fuel oil loaded (see below).
If time permits, it is good practice for an independent surveyor to attend.
Quality
Significant disputes can arise where off-specification fuel has been supplied, leading to
serious engine or mechanical problems. Removing such fuel can also be a time consuming
and costly exercise.
When bunkering, a ship should always take its own manifold drip sample, which often
represents the best evidence of the fuel supplied. An automatic or manual continuous drip
sampling method is recommended. The drip sample should then be split into at least four
samples so that, in the event of a quality dispute, there are sufficient samples for testing
in addition to the MARPOL annex VI sample (which cannot be used for this purpose).
Further samples may be drawn from the tanks at a later stage should additional evidence be
required as to the quality and / or grade of fuel in question.
Routine testing will normally identify a quality problem prior to the fuel being
consumed, thereby giving the ship operator an opportunity to assess the risks involved and
the steps to be taken. There may, however, be occasions when a ship operator only learns
of a quality problem after the fuel has been burned, with problems manifesting themselves
either in poor performance or mechanical breakdown.
In any case it is prudent to determine the quality of the fuel supplied as soon as is
practically possible, not least as many bunker supply contracts contain strict time limits for
notification of claims.
58
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
59
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
General
Record of engine setting, whether propeller rpm, combinatory setting or other record.
Record of use of shaft alternator.
Record of use of generators.
Details of number of generators designed for use during voyages with heavy or light loads.
Record of fuel flow meter readings.
Record of fuel tank soundings.
Fuel loading, handling and consumption records.
Record of fuel change-over.
Details of periods of increased fuel consumption, including due to
• unusual use of air conditioning
• high electrical load
• tank cleaning
• cargo heating
• ballast water operations
• use of incinerators.
Record of charterer’s instruction – slow steaming or increased speed.
Details of any machinery factors / failure.
Record of change of ballast status.
Oil record book.
Ship routeing
Voyage plan.
Navigational records (see Table 14 on page 44).
Records of any diversion (see Table 8 on page 22).
Record of messages sent to all concerned (owner, charterer, port agent etc.) advising of
diversion and why.
Speed
Ship’s logs and any further speed information.
Details of anything that might have reduced the ship’s performance, including
• alterations in course for traffic avoidance
• periods of slow steaming
• stoppages
• engine / machinery breakdown
• adverse tidal streams / currents.
Fuel consumption
Accurate records of fuel consumption for
• main engines
• boilers
• auxiliaries
particularly when ship is instructed to proceed at an economical speed, when navigating
in congested waters or when burning marine diesel oil.
60
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
61
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
Radio log.
The Mariner’s Role in Collecting Evidence Handbook
62
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
63
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
INDEX
The Mariner’s Role in Collecting Evidence Handbook
Page
Accuracy......................................................................................................................................... 3, 4, 5
Air pollution................................................................................................................................... 37, 43
Cargo.................................................................................................................................................... 26
– care............................................................................................................................................... 24
– samples........................................................................................................................................... 7
– slow operations............................................................................................................................. 60
Charterparties...................................................................................................................................... 25
Collisions – between ships..................................................................................................... 38, 44, 45
– with moored or anchored ships evidence................................................................................... 46
Congestion........................................................................................................................................... 59
Container cargo................................................................................................................................... 33
Crew..................................................................................................................................................... 14
Crew disputes...................................................................................................................................... 19
Damage.......................................................................................................................................... 44, 48
– to property.............................................................................................................................. 38, 46
– non-contact.................................................................................................................................. 38
– machinery parts.............................................................................................................................. 7
Data recorders..................................................................................................................................... 44
Delay – hull and machinery................................................................................................................ 52
– port disputes.......................................................................................................................... 55, 59
Digital cameras...................................................................................................................................... 6
Discharge port...................................................................................................................28, 30, 32 34,
Disciplinary action........................................................................................................................ 16, 19
Disposing of evidence........................................................................................................................... 8
Distressed people................................................................................................................................ 22
Diversion........................................................................................................................................ 17, 22
Documents............................................................................................................................................ 7
Dry cargo.............................................................................................................................................. 29
Electronic evidence............................................................................................................................... 7
Engine room........................................................................................................................................ 45
Equipment....................................................................................................................................... 7, 51
Evidence required – commercial disputes......................................................................................... 54
– hull and machinery incidents...................................................................................................... 50
– incidents caused by the ship....................................................................................................... 35
– incidents involving cargo............................................................................................................. 23
– incidents involving people........................................................................................................... 13
– most incidents................................................................................................................................ 9
Factual accuracy............................................................................................................................. 3, 4, 5
Fatalities at sea.................................................................................................................................... 15
Film cameras.......................................................................................................................................... 6
64
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
INDEX
Index
Page
Fire....................................................................................................................................................... 53
Fixed and floating objects................................................................................................................... 38
Fuel consumption evidence................................................................................................................ 60
Fuel supply disputes..................................................................................................................... 58, 62
Illness............................................................................................................................................. 15, 18
IMDG Code............................................................................................................................ 33, 37, 42
Impairment to ship’s efficiency.......................................................................................................... 52
IMSBC Code....................................................................................................................................... 29
Incident reporting......................................................................................................................... 11, 14
Industrial action............................................................................................................................ 16, 19
Informal records.................................................................................................................................... 8
Injury.................................................................................................................................................... 13
ISM Code........................................................................................................................................ 4, 11
ISPS Code........................................................................................................................................... 16
Legal privilege....................................................................................................................................... 7
Liquid cargo......................................................................................................................................... 31
Lloyd’s Standard Form........................................................................................................................ 39
Load port...........................................................................................................................26, 29, 31, 33
Navigation............................................................................................................................................ 44
New building warranty disputes.................................................................................................. 55, 59
Non-contact damage..................................................................................................................... 38, 48
Notebooks............................................................................................................................................. 8
Noxious substance pollution........................................................................................................ 36, 42
Paper documents................................................................................................................................... 7
Parts, machinery.................................................................................................................................... 7
Passengers............................................................................................................................................ 14
People in distress.......................................................................................................................... 17, 22
Performance disputes.................................................................................................................... 56, 60
Personal injury............................................................................................................................... 14, 18
Personal protective equipment.......................................................................................................... 18
65
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
INDEX
The Mariner’s Role in Collecting Evidence Handbook
Page
Personnel details................................................................................................................................. 11
Photographs........................................................................................................................................... 6
Physical evidence.................................................................................................................................. 7
Pilot authority evidence...................................................................................................................... 47
Pollution......................................................................................................................................... 36, 41
Port authority....................................................................................................................................... 47
Port delay disputes........................................................................................................................ 55, 59
Port safety disputes....................................................................................................................... 57, 61
Preparations for voyage........................................................................................................... 29, 31, 33
Preserving evidence.......................................................................................................................... 3, 7
Property damage............................................................................................................................ 38, 46
Records – informal................................................................................................................................ 8
– maintaining.................................................................................................................................... 4
Reports................................................................................................................................................... 6
Third parties........................................................................................................................................ 14
Videos..................................................................................................................................................... 6
Visual evidence...................................................................................................................................... 5
Voyage data recorders............................................................................................................................ 8
Voyage preparations............................................................................................................................. 26
66
Authorised User (See Terms of Use): Member of North of England P&I Association
THE MARINER’S
There are two main types of evidence: ‘factual
evidence’, which is what a witness actually
North of England P&I Association has
offices in the UK, Greece, Hong Kong, ROLE IN COLLECTING
EVIDENCE HANDBOOK
Japan and Singapore and is one of the
said or did or saw at the time of an incident and leading international mutual marine liability
‘opinion evidence’, which is what a witness insurers with over 120 million GT of entered
tonnage. Founded in 1860, the Association
thought about what happened. This handbook is has long recognised the importance of
about collecting and preserving factual evidence. providing practical loss prevention advice
It is intended to give guidance to mariners about to its members, believing this to be the most
effective way to reduce the number and scale
A GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICE
the different types of factual evidence relevant of claims. The Association has developed a
to the more common incidents and accidents on world-wide reputation for the quality and
board ships, helping them to collect and preserve diversity of its loss prevention initiatives,
which include this series of loss prevention
the very best evidence. Example lists of evidence guides co-authored with industry experts.
for the more common incidents are included in
each chapter. The lists provide comprehensive
guidance to the nature and extent of evidence that
may be required.
NORTH OF ENGLAND P&I ASSOCIATION
ISBN 978-0-9558257-6-7