Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IN ANALYSIS OF FLAVOURS
1
2. A SUCCESSFUL TECHNIQUE
3. ANALYTICAL METHODS
The primary technique used in flavor analysis is gas chromatography, with and
without mass spectrometry and olfactometry. The GC is one of popular instrument
used in the world. Majority of analyses of flavor in foods are done by GC but
liquid chromatography also plays a significant role in flavor analysis, particularly
for sugars, capsaicin, protein fragments (umami), and other compounds that are not
2
amenable to GC because they are nonvolatile, thermally labile, or too polar to be
separated by GC.
Passing the effluent from the GC into a mass spectrometer allows identification
and quantification of the chemical components detected by the GC. The three
most-used types of MS are quadrupole, ion-trap, and TOF. The first two typically
3.2: OLFACTOMETRY
3.3: DECONVOLUTION
One of the problems with GC is that although we get very good sensitivity and
lower detection limits, we might also get coelution—overlapping—of peaks.
Separation of the peaks can be accomplished through the use of deconvolution
software consisting of algorithms that provide precise, rapid compound
identification and quantification. The algorithms identify target compounds present
even in complex mixtures.
3
4. EXTRACTION METHODS
Some compounds such as essential oils (orange, lemon, etc.) can be directly
injected into the GC and analyzed, but once the compounds are formulated into a
product, they need to be extracted before injection. There are two primary methods
of extraction: solvent based and solventless.
4
Flavor compounds in foods may, however, be at concentrations too low to be
accurately detected by GC; concentration of volatiles may, therefore, be required
prior to GC operation.
5
amount of solvent is used for extraction so the volatile compounds can be easily
concentrated more than tenfold.
(HS-SPME)
Different methods such as purge and trap, static headspace, liquid-liquid, solid
phase extraction, and solid phase microextraction are used for extraction and
concentration of volatile compounds. Among various separation and concentration
techniques, head space solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) using a fused-
silica fibre combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) has
gained increasing attention for the extraction and analysis of volatile, semi-volatile,
polar and non-polar compounds in foods such as vegetables, legumes, beverages
and dairy products. In comparison with conventional extraction techniques, HS-
SPME is a solvent-free, less expensive, fast, and simple technique and involves the
adsorption of volatile compounds onto an adsorbent fibre. In fibre-SPME, adsorption
6
is based on the equilibrium partitioning of the analytes between the solid-phase of the
SPME fibre, liquid or solid sample matrix. Upon heating, adsorbed analytes are
desorbed onto a GC column and analyzed by gas chromatography. SPME is a
partition-based extraction technique in which the profile of extracted compounds is
highly dependent on fiber coating used.
7
characterize the volatile constituents of food rapidly. GC-IMS (Ion Mobility
Spectrometry) represents a new gas-phase separation detection methodology which
harnesses the high separation ability of gas chromatography, together with the fast
response of IMS. Gas chromatography–ion mobility spectrometry (GC–IMS) is a
powerful technique for the separation and sensitive detection of volatile organic
compounds. It has a fast response, high sensitivity, easy operation, and low cost.
6. DETECTING AROMAS
The key aroma components of food can also be determined by GC-IMS. The levels
of polyamines and monoamines can be Quantified using the technique – these
serve as an indicator of food freshness as these products are formed by the
degradation of amino acids.
With regards to off flavour, GC IMS can be used cat to quantify product of lipid
oxidation which produce undesirable flavours in food (and undetectable by human
smell). In the context of fermentation, the technique can quantify characteristic
flavours to enable fermentation to be terminated at the correct time point; this is
especially useful in the production of beer, as well as cheese ripening.
7. MECHANISM
8
their interaction with a specific column lining or filling, called the 'stationary
phase'. As the chemicals exit the end of the column, they are detected and
identified electronically. The function of the stationary phase in the column is to
separate different components, causing each one to exit the column at a different
time. Other parameters that can be used to alter the order or time of retention are
the carrier gas flow rate, column length and the temperature.
In GC, the mobile phase or carrier phase is an inert gas such as helium and the
stationary phase is a very thin layer of liquid or polymer on an inert solid support
inside a column. The volatile analytes interact with the walls of the column, and
are eluted based on the temperature of the column at specific retention time. The
eluted compounds are identified with detectors. Flame ionization and mass
spectrometry are the most commonly used detectors for flavor analysis.
8. ANALYSIS
9
As a flavor or food sample passes through a heated capillary column, the chemical
components are evaporated and separated, producing peaks according to the time it
takes to reach a detector, such as a flame ionization detector, the most common
type. There are two basic types: comprehensive GCxGC and heart-cutting GC.
REFERENCES
1. Deibler, K. D., Acree, T. E., & Lavin, E. H. (1999). Solid phase microextraction application in gas
chromatography/olfactometry dilution analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Vol. 47, No.
4, pp. 1616–1618, ISSN 0021-8561.
2. Song H, Liu J. GC-O-MS technique and its applications in food flavor analysis. Food Res Int. 2018
Dec;114:187-198. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.07.037. Epub 2018 Aug 3. PMID: 30361015.
3. Anandram Venkatasubramanian, Vincent T. K. Sauer, Swapan K. Roy, Mike Xia, David S. Wishart,
and Wayne K. Hiebert . Nano-Optomechanical Systems for Gas Chromatography. Nano
Letters 2016, 16 (11) , 6975-6981. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03066
10
11