You are on page 1of 9

J. Periodontal Res.

14: 403-410, 1979

An in vitro study of the role of


dietary factors in the aetiology
of tooth staining associated
with the use of chlorhexidine
M. ADDY, S. PRAYITNO, L. TAYLOR AND S. CADOOAN
Department of Periodontology, Dental School, Welsh National School of Medicine,
Heath Park, Cardiff, S. Wales, United Kingdom.

A spectrophotometric measurement technique was employed to investigate the role of


dietary factors in the aetiology of chlorhexidine staining. Standard solutions were prepared
from a range of dietary components. Test perspex specimens were maintained in the stan-
dard solutions throughout a five day period being removed from the solutions three times a
day and soaked in a 0.2 % chlorhexidine gluconate solution. Control specimens were
similarily treated but not exposed to chlorhexidine gluconate. Daily optical density record-
ings demonstrated some staining of specimens by all dietary components. However for most
there was no significant difference between test and control specimens and in visual
terms such staining was very minimal. Nevertheless, tea, red wine and port produced
rapid and heavy staining on test specimens which was highly significantly increased when
compared to control specimens. Coffee similarly produced more staining of test specimens
compared to control specimens; however, the intensity of staining was considerably less.
Employing the same experimental method, both cigarette smoke and cigarette smoke in
solution produced significantly more staining of control specimens compared to test
specimens.

(Accepted for publication November 28, 1978)

initial clinical experiments with chlor-


Introduction
hexidine, many studies concerning the
There is now considerable evidence that properties and clinical uses of chlorhexidine
bacterial plaque is the major aetiological have been reported (Review Nagle & Turn-
factor in the development of chronic gingi- bull 1978). Of prime importance were the
vitis (Loe, Theilade & Jensen 1965, Waer- long term trials demonstrating the safety of
haug 1967). The observations concerning the the antiseptic with no systemic or serious
antiplaque activity of chlorhexidine gluco- local side effects observed after two years
nate (Loe & Rindom Schiott 1970 a, b) not continuous use (Nuki et al. 1976, Rindom
only tended to confirm the role of plaque Schiott, Loe & Briner 1976). Throughout
in chronic gingivitis but also demonstrated the test period however a reduction in both
the possibility of preventing gingival disease plaque and gingivitis was recorded (Loe et
by the use of a chemical agent. Since these al. 1976). Although much of the published
404 ADDY, PRAYITNO, TAYLOR AND CADOGAN

work has demonstrated the potential value this study and are shown in Table 1. All of
of chlorhexidine as a preventive and thera- the preparations chosen were those which
peutic agent; nevertheless, local side effects, would normally be in solution iti the diet.
in particular staining of the teeth and Standard solutions were prepared from the
restorative materials, tend to limit the long dietary components where necessary. Thus
term usage of chlorhexidine (Flotra et al. a standard solution of tea was prepared
1971, Eriksen & Gjermo 1973). The stain- from 8 grams of a commercial brand boiled
ing is typically brown in colour varying in 800 millilitres of distilled water for 2
from individual to individual (Heyden minutes and allowed to cool to room tem-
1973), is not readily removed and often perature. The liquid was then decanted
requires a professional cleaning which may from the tea leaves. For coffee, the stan-
be time consuming (Hoyos, Murray &, dard solution was prepared from 9.7 grams
Shaw 1977). of instant coffee granules dissolved in 1
The chemical nature of the staining and litre of water and boiled for two minutes
the mechanism underlying its formation is and allowed to cool as before. For the re-
not fully understood. However, a direct maining dietary components requiring dis-
relationship between the presence of the solution or suspension in water, the propor-
stain and local concentration of chlor- tions are shown in Table 1. All of the re-
hexidine was established (Heyden 1973). maining components were used as supplied.
Suggestions which seek to explain the In the case of tea and coffee which were
aetiology of the staining associated with the used in more than one experiment a fresh
use of chlorhexidine have included denatu- standard solution was prepared in each case
ration of the chlorhexidine molecule on the and used throughout a single experiment.
tooth surface, or the formation of coloured Clear methyl methacrylate (perspex)
reaction products with aldehydes and (Perspex. LCI. Ltd. Macclesfield, Cheshire,
ketones (Nordbo 1971). However, none of England) rectangular blocks measuring 30
these hypotheses have been borne out in mm X 10 mm X 5 mm were prepared.
clinical studies. The role of dietary factors This size coincided with the width of the
as aetiological agents have been investi- sample chamber of a Beckman (Beckman.
gated. Thus, chlorhexidine in the presence of Beckman Instrument Inc. FuUerton, Cali-
food dyes, has been shown to produce fornia 80566, U.S.A.) series DB spectro-
coloured compounds on hydroxyapatite photometer. Three test and three control
(Jensen 1977). Furthermore, beverages, in perspex specimens were placed in 25 milli-
particular tea and coffee, produced staining litre volumes of each standard solution of
of tooth and acrylic specimens previously the dietary components under study. Three
exposed to chlorhexidine (Addy & Jenkins times each day the test specimens were
1977). The aim of this in vitro study was removed from their respective standard
to obtain more information concerning the solution and placed into an 0.2 % chlor-
staining associated with the use of chlor- hexidine gluconate solution for 2 minutes.
hexidine gluconate by employing a spec- At the end of 2 minutes they were removed
trophotometric measuring technique.- and allowed to dry and then returned to
the standard solutions. At the same time
the eontrol specimens were removed to
Method and Materials distilled water for 2 minutes before return-
A range of dietary components which are ing to the respective standard solution. On
normally found in the diet were chosen for 5 consecutive days between 9 a.m. and 10
DIETARY FACTORS IN CHLORHEXIDINE STAINING 405

a.m. the specimens were removed from the the control specimens removed to distilled
test solutions, rinsed in distilled water and water. Again, at 9 a.m. - 10 a.m. each day
allowed to dry. The optical density of the the optical density of the specimens was
specimens was then measured on the spec- recorded using a spectrophotometer at the
trophotometer, at the previously determined wavelength corresponding to the lambda
lambda maximum for the respective dietary maximum for the solution of cigarette
component (Table 1). A further experiment smoke in water.
employing tea and coffee as the standard The same experiment was repeated with-
solutions was carried out using the same out water, in the glass jar containing the
methodology but with the experiment ex- specimens. Again, the smoke from 3 heavy
tending to 10 days. tar cigarettes was sucked into the contain-
A similar experimental method was used ers at periods throughout each day. When
to determine the staining effects of ciga- the jar was full of smoke the inlet and out-
rette smoke in the presence of chlor- let tubes were sealed. Test and control
hexidine. First, 3 test and 3 control spec- specimens were removed, as before, 3 times
imens were placed in separate glass jars a day to chlorhexidine gluconate or distilled
containing 100 millilitres of distilled water. water. The optical densities for each spec-
The cigarette smoke from a heavy tar non- imen were determined each day for a 5 day
tipped cigarette was sucked through the period.
distilled water in each jar by negative pres- Statistical analysis of the results was car-
sure using a Venturi pump, on 3 occasions ried out using the Student 't' test.
each day. The specimens remained within
the water throughout a 5 day period except
that 3 times each day the test specimens Results
were removed for 2 minutes to a 0.2% chlor- The lambda maxima values of the standard
hexidine gluconate solution as before and solutions used in the study, together with

Table 1
The preparation, pH and lambda maxima of the dietary components.

Dietary Lambda maxima


Method of preparation pH
Components m,u

Beer As supplied 4.4 312


Martini As supplied 3.6 310
Port As supplied 4.0 312
Sherry As supplied 3.9 310
Red wine As supplied 3.9 275
Ribena (Biaciccurrant) As supplied 3.3 260
Coca-Coia As supplied 3.2 300
Orangeade As supplied 3.0 300
Raspberryade As supplied 3.3 265
Coffee 9.7 gms in 1 litre of water 5.4 290
Drini<ing chocolate 80 mis in 800 mis of water 7.3 253
Ovaitine 80 mis in 800 mis of water 6.5 310
Tea 8 gms in 800 mis of water 5.6 295
Bovril (Meat extract) 80 mis in 800 mis of water 5.8 255
Gravy Browning 15 mis in 600 mis of water 4.9 314
Soup (Tomato) 1 pack in 800 mis of water 4.8 312
Soy Sauce 300 mis in 300 mis of water 4.8 310
406 ADDY, PRAYITNO. TAYLOR AND CADOGAN

2-0
2-0
1-8 Experiment Control
1-8
1-6 Tea *' • •- — . «
1-4 1-6
ft Experiment Cotteeo o o. —-_o
-' Control
Io 1-2 2 1-4

f 1-2
O-B a
0-a I 1-0
0-4 0-8
0-2 0-6
ll Mxau 0-4
cf., _.O" ^
0-2

5 6 8 9 10
Fig. 1. The mean optical density readings for test and Days
control specimens exposed to standard solutions at 5 Fig. 2. The mean optical density readings for test and
days. control specimens exposed to tea and coffee over a 10
day period.

their pH values, are shown (Table 1). The


pH range of the dietary components was in Table 2. Considerable variation in stain-
3—7.3, a lower pH being common to all of ing by the different dietary factors was ap-
the soft non alcoholic drinks. The mean parent. Thus at 5 days, all of the standard
optical density values for test and control solutions produced staining of the chlor-
specimens measured in absorbance units at hexidine treated specimens as evidenced by
day 5 of the experimental period for each the recordable absorbance figures. How-
dietary component are shown in Fig. 1. and ever, the degree was slight and for many,
the significance of the differences are given this was not significantly different from the
staining recorded on the control specimens.
Moreover, in the case of Ovaitine and Bov-
Table 2 ril, significantly more staining was apparent
Significance of differences between experi- on the control specimens compared to the
mental and control specimens exposed to test specimens (p = < 0.05). However,
dietary compounds. port, tea and red wine produced marked.
Beer P > 0-4 NS
Martini P > 0-2 NS
Port P < 0-001 S" 1-60 Experlmetit
Sherry P>0-2 NS 1*40 . Control
Wine P < 0-001 S*
Ribena P > 0-2 NS 1-20
Coca Cola P > 0-7 NS <u

Orangeade
Raspberryade
P > 0-3
P>0-9
NS
NS
1^
1 0-80
Coffee P < 0-001 S* •^ n*fiA
Drinkling Chocolate P > 0-1 NS
Ovaitine P < 0-05 S** 0-40
Tea P < 0-001 s*.
Bovril P > 0-05 s** 0-20
Gravy Browning P>0-5 NS
Soup P>0-9 NS 1 2 3 4 5
Soy Sauce P>0-2 NS Days
Pin
Fig. .?3. The mean optical density readings for test
* In favour of the experiment specimens and control specimens exposed to orangeade over a
** In favour of the control specimens 5 day period.
DIETARY FACTORS IN CHL ORHEX 1 D i NE STAINING 407

RIBENA COFFEE PORT TEA RED WINE

Fig. 4. Appearance of test and control specimen exposed to different standard solutions at 5 days.

and highly significantly more staining on staining of test and control specimens can
the test than the control specimens (p = <C be seen (Fig. 4). Thus by 5 days the
0.001). Furthermore, the staining occurred staining of test specimens by port, red
very rapidly with the maximum absorbance wine and tea, was dramatic in com-
figure for the spectrophotometer achieved parison with the respective control spec-
by day 2 for port and tea and day 3 for imens. Furthermore, coffee staining of
red wine. Coffee also caused significantly test specimens was noticeably less than tea,
more staining of chloi'hexidine treated red wine or port. Ribena, shown as an
specimens than control specimens at 5 days example of the other dietary components,
(p = << 0.001). Directly comparing the produced little change in optical density;
development of tea and coffee staining over the test and control perspex specimens ap-
a 10 day period (Fig. 2) demonstrated that peared almost completely clear.
the staining of the test specimens by coffee The optical density readings of the test
was slower and significantly less at all time and control specimens either soaked in a
periods (p = < 0.001). The staining by solution of cigarette smoke or exposed
other dietary components measured at 5 directly to the cigarette smoke throughout
days was very slight and for some, in par- the 5 day period are shown in Table 3. The
ticular soft drinks, the development of optical density readings increased pro-
staining did not appear progressive (Fig. 3). gressively throughout the 5 day period for
Visually, the difference in the degree of the test and control specimens for both
408 ADDY, PRAYITNO, TAYLOR AND CADOGAN

Table 3
The effect of chlorhexidine and cigarette smoke on the optical density of perspex
specimens throughout a 5 day period.

Day Absorbance
Specimens 3

Cigarette Test 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.14 0.15


Smoke
Solution
Control 0.15 0.30 0.46 0.55 0.66
Cigarette Test 0.67 0.58 0.89 1.04 1.33
Smoke
Control 0.73 1.19 1.07 1.23 1.77

groups. However, the optical density read- Since chlorhexidine has been shown to
ings were significantly higher for the con- adsorb to methyl methacrylates, as well as
trol specimens when compared to the test teeth (Eriksen & Gjermo 1973, Heyden,
specimens both for the cigarette smoke Nordbo & RoUa 1971) the results of these
solution and the cigarette smoke alone laboratory findings would thus infer that
(p = < 0.01 and < 0.05 respectively). certain dietary factors are able to interact
with this locally adsorbed chlorhexidine.
The staining observed was consistent with
Discussion
previous in vitro studies into the staining
In this study the role of dietary compo- by beverages (Addy & Jenkins 1977) and
nents in the aetiology of staining associated food dyes (Jensen 1977) of specimen ma-
with the use of chlorhexidine gluconate was terials previously exposed to chlorhexidine
investigated. Thus, this in vitro experiment gluconate. All of the dietary components
demonstrated that dietary components examined under both test and control situ-
stained perspex specimens previously ex- ations demonstrated an affinity for the
posed to a 0.2 % chlorhexidine gluconate perspex as measured by the spectrophoto-
solution. Although many of the solutions meter. Thus it is likely that the staining ob-
prepared from the dietary components served clinically may result from a combi-
produced staining on perspex, in most cases nation effect of many components. How-
this was slight with no significant difference ever, the dramatic difference in both the
between the test and control specimens. degree of staining and the rate of stain
However, tea, red wine and port produced development for tea, red wine and port
both rapid and marked staining on speci- would indicate that a few dietary factors
mens exposed to chlorhexidine, and this play a major role in the staining observed
staining in visual terms was dramatically clinically.
greater than control specimens soaked in Both the cigarette smoke solution and
these beverages. Coffee was, of the other the cigarette smoke alone produce consid-
dietary components, the only one to-produce erable staining of both test and control
significantly more staining on test as op- specimens. However, chlorhexidine treat-
posed to control specimens. However the ment of specimens did not significantly
rate of stain development and the degree increase the staining; in fact, the reverse
of staining observed was markedly reduced was observed. Aldehydes and ketones may
when compared to tea. complex with adsorbed chlorhexidine to
DIETARY FAOTORS IN CHLORHEXIDINE STAINING 409

produce staining on enamel in vitro (Nord- United Kingdom contains considerable


00 1971). The results from this study would quantities of tannin-like substances, all of
suggest that the aldehydes in cigarette which are gallic acid derivatives. Further-
smoke (Egle 1970) did not play a major more the ratio of the derivatives theaflavin
role in the staining observed. (yellow) and theambigin (brown) determine
The use of a spectrophotometric method the quality and colour of the tea solution
of analysis appears to have some advan- (Harler 1963). It is possible therefore that
tages. In particular, quantitative pieasure- such derivatives at the pH or the test solu-
ment of the staining was possible, which tions employed would be dissociated with
permitted a direct comparison of staining, the anionic and chromogenic part of the
thus eliminating the subjective interpreta- molecule negatively charged. Since the pH
tion of colour and shade. Colorimetric of most of the dietary solutions used in
methods have been used previously to as- this study lay between the range of 3-5 the
sess stain on acrylic resins (BonesvoU & differences in staining observed with chlor-
Olsen 1974), and this related spectrophoto- hexidine would thus appear primarily to
metric technique may be of future value in arise from a difference in chemical com-
assessing potential antiplaque agents both position of the dietary factors. Neverthe-
for possible side effects of staining and for less at pH levels below 2, irrespective of
adsorption properties. However, the use of the chemical nature of the dietary compo-
perspex limits the spectrophotometric anal- nent, adsorption of chlorhexidine (Bones-
ysis to the visible light spectrum. The ad- voU, Lokken & RoUa 1974), and therefore
sorption of chlorhexidine on to the perspex the staining of the perspex, may be re-
can only be inferred from the difference in duced.
staining observed between test and control
specimens. Nevertheless acrylic has been Acknowledgments
demonstrated to be capable of adsorbing We are grateful to Dr. T. Khosla, Senior
chlorhexidine (Budtz-Jorgensen & Loe Lecturer in Medical Statistics, Welsh Na-
1972). The observed interaction of chlor- tional School of Medicine, Cardiff, for sta-
hexidine both in solution and on surfaces tistical analysis of the results.
with the dye azocarmine B (Heyden, Nord-
bo & RoUa 1971) and food dyes (Jensen
References
1977) would support the hypothesis that
staining occurs as a result of a cationic- Addy, M. & Jenkins, P. M. 1977. Chlorhexidine
anionic interaction between chlorhexidine, staining: In vitro study of beverages as
aetiological factors. I.R.C.S. Medical Science:
and negatively charged ions in the oral Biomedical Technology: Dentistry and Oral
environment (Jensen 1977, Addy & Jenkins Biology; Social and Occupational Medicine,
1977). The di-cationic nature of chlor- 5: 393.
hexidine (Leach 1977) at physiological pH BonesvoU, P., Lokken, P. & RoUa, G. 1974.
would facilitate such a reaction on the Influence of concentration, time, temperature
and pH on the retention of chlorhexidine
tooth surface. in the human oral cavity after mouth rinses.
The most chromogenic dietary factors Arch. Oral Biol. 19: 1025-1029.
determined from the spectrophotometric BonesvoU, P. & Olsen, I. 1974. Influence of
analysis method employed in this study all teeth, plaque and dentures on the retention
of chlorhexidine in the human oral cavity.
contained tannin or tannin like derivatives /. Clin. Periodontol. 1: 214-221.
(Pearson 1976). Tea, perhaps the most Budtz-Jorgensen, E. & Loe, H. 1972. Chlor-
commonly consumed hot beverage in the hexidine as a dentine disinfectant in the
410 A D D Y , P R A Y I T N O , T A Y L O R AND C A D O G A N

treatment of denture stomatitis. Scand. J. upon the development of dental plaque ana
Dent. Res. 80: 457-463. gingivitis. Dental Plaque. McHugh, W. D.
Egle, J. L. 1970. Retention of inhaled acetalde- Ed., pp. 217-255. Edinburgh: E. &. S. Living-
hyde in man. /. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. VIA: stone.
14-19. Loe, H., Rindom Schiott, C , Glavind, L. &
Eriksen, H. M. & Gjermo, P. 1973. Incidence Karring, T. 1976. Two years oral use of
of stained tooth surfaces in students using chlorhexidine in man. I. General design and
chlorhexidine-containing dentifrices. Scand. clinical effects. /. Periodontal Res. 11: 135-
J. Dent. Res. 81: 533-537. 144.
Flotra, L. Gjermo, P., RoUa, G. & Waerhaug, Loe, H., Theilade, E. & Jensen, S. B. 1965.
J. 1971. Side effects of chlorhexidine mouth Experimental gingivitis in man. /. Periodon-
washes. Scand. J. Dent. Res. 97: 119-125 tol. 36: 177-187.
Harler, C. R. 1%3. Tea manufacture, pp. 13-22. Nagle, P. J. & Turnbull, R. S. 1978. Chlor-
London, New York, Toronto: Oxford Uni- hexidine an ideal plaque inhibiting agent.
versity Press. /. Can. Dent. Assoc. 2: 73-76.
Heyden, G. 1973. Relation between locally Nordbo, H. 1971. Discolouration of human
high concentration of chlorhexidine and teeth by a combination of chlorhexidine and
staining as seen in the clinic. /. Periodontal. aldehydes or ketones in vitro. Scand. J.
Res. Suppl. 12: 76-80. Dent. Res. 79: 356-361.
Heyden, G., Nordbo, H. & RoUa, G. 1971. Nuki, K., Schlenker, R., Loe, H. & Rindom
Staining of chlorhexidine with azocarmine B. Schiott, C. 1976, Two years oral use of
Swed. Dent. J. 64: 611-616. chlorhexidine in men. II. Effects on en-
Hoyos, D. F., Murray, J. J. & Shaw, L. 1977. zymes in oral epithelia. /. Periodontal Res.
The effect of chlorhexidine gel on plaque 11: 172-175.
and gingivitis in children. Br. Dent. J. 142: Pearson, D. 1976. The Chemical Analysis of
366. Foods. 7th Ed. Churchill Livingstone.
Jensen, J. E. 1977. Binding of dyes to chlor- Rindom Schiott, C, Loe, H. «fe Briner, W. H.
hexidine-treated hydroxyapatite. Scand. J. 1976. Two years oral use of chlorhexidine in
Dent. Res. 85: 334-340. man. IV. Effect on various medical para-
Leach, S. A. 1977. Mode of action of chlor- meters. /. Periodontal Res. 11: 158-164.
hexidine in the mouth. In: The Borderland Waerhaug, J. 1967. Prevalence of periodontal
between Caries and Periodontal Disease. disease in Ceylon. Acta Odontol. Scand. 25:
Lehner, T., ed., pp. 105-128. London: Aca- 205-231.
demic Press.
Loe, H. & Rindom Schiott, C. 1970 a. The
effect of mouthrinses and topical applica- Address:
tion of chlorhexidine on the development of Department of Periodontology
dental plaque and gingivitis in man. /. Peri- Dental School
odontal Res. 5: 79-83. Welsh National School of Medicine
Loe, H. & Rindom Schiott, C. 1970 b. The Heath Park
effect of suppression of the oral microflora Cardiff, S. Wales, United Kingdom

You might also like