of Religion in Ethics
the Role of
Lesson HI:
ncerns beliefs and practices of what is good or bad, right or
ous or vicious, from a religious point of view. A Christian ethic, for instance,
don the radical teachings of the religious leader Jesus Christ about loving
being a good Samaritan, loving one’s enemies, being guided by the
d the like. For some, the religious response is what is really needeg
ges posed by globalization and other contemporary issues,
peligious ethics co
wrong, virtu'
may be base’
one’s neighbor,
Father's will, an
concerning the challen}
1. Religion and Ethics
Practically, ethics may be defined as a system of moral principles which affect
how people make decisions and lead their lives. Ethics is concerned with what is
good and right for persons and society.
On the other hand, religion is defined as “people's beliefs and opinions
concerning the existence, nature, and worship of a deity or deities, and divine
involvement in the universe and human life” (“Religion,” 2009). Referring to the sacred
engagement with that which is believed to be a spiritual reality, religion denotes the
belief in, or the worship of, a god (or gods) and the worship or service to God or
the supernatural. The term ‘supernatural’ means “whatever transcends the powers”
of nature or human agency” (“Religion,” n.d). The term ‘religion’ is sometimes used
interchangeably with ‘faith, ‘creed,’ ‘belief system, or ‘conviction’
A teligion is also viewed as “an organized collection of beliefs, cultural systems,
and worldviews that relate humanity to an order of existence” (“Religion,” n.d.). Many
religions possess holy scriptures, narratives, or sacred accounts that aim to explain
the origin and meaning of life and the universe. From the religions’ beliefs about the
cosmos and human nature, adherents usually draw religious laws, an ideal way of
living, and detailed rules of ethical or moral conduct. (For a detailed discussion about
religion, you may consult the Appendix K; "Religion and Belief Systems” of this book)
rence between religion and ethics is about the
In some measure, religion is based on the
.s meaning. These divine
etc) and introduced as
Some submit that the diffe
disparity between revelation and reason.
idea that God (or some deity) reveals insights about life and its n
insights are compiled in texts (the Bible, the Torah, the Koran, el
‘revelation.’From a Strictly hy
on the tenets of Fe8SON. That j
deemed justifiable, This defi :
religion or a belief in God, for
also for ethical discernmeny
IManisti,
= Perspective, ethics, on the other hand, is based
iti *MYthing that is not rationally provable cannot be
a en ethics, however, does not necessarily exclude
a also a (ommon belief that human reason, designed
a
emphasize the relationship a rd from a supernatural God. Indeed, many ethicists
’ le
difference, between ethics and religion.
2. Religion’s Role in Ethics
Many ethicists beli
believe that ‘eligion is necessary for the continued survival of
morality as an int
y integral part of human life, especially in a globalized world. University
of Tennessee, Knoxville (UTk) :
' Philosophy professor Glenn C. Graber calls this
apologetic claim the ‘cut-flowers thesis’ (1972, pp. 1-5) which consists of a hypothetical
judgment that, “Morality cannot Survive, in the long run, ifits ties to religion are cut.”
This proposition is a prediction of what would happen to morality if it were severed
from religion. In 1894, Russian writer Leo Tolstoy (1828-1910) made the following early
statement of this thesis:
"The attempts to found a morality apart from religion are like the attempts of
children who, wishing to transplant a flower that pleases them, pluck it from the roots
that seem to them unpleasing and superfluous, and stick it rootless into the ground.
Without religion there can be no real, sincere morality, just as without roots there can:
be no real flower.” (1964, pp. 31-32)
The cut-flower thesis thus implies that those who believe that morality is a
valuable human institution, and those who wish to avoid moral disaster, should
therefore make every effort to preserve its connection with the true religion and the
sound religious belief that forms its roots. As morality is currently in a withering stage
in this globalized era, its decline can be identified with the exorbitant Secilartaation
of many things. Support for this claim can be found bout among those sympathetic to
religion and surprisingly enough, among those with little or no sympathy for religion,
Basil Wille, a rliginist, cals fo Urgent action to re-unite religion and ethics.
He holds that there has been a progressive de- Christianization during the last three or
four centuries, the outcome of which “is et we see around |
the moral and spiritual nihilism of the Modern world, particular
creeds" (1964, p. 118).WT. Stace, a secularist, surprisingly SUPPorts the cut-flower thesis when he sai
“the chaotic and bewildered state of the modern world is due to man’s loss of ei
his abandonment of God and religion. | agree with this statement... Along with the
ruin of the religious vision there went the ruin of moral principles and indeed zi
values” (1967, pp. 3, 9).
‘And for those who doubt that religion ever promoted morality in history (since
immorality has flourished even in ages of religious domination), not less than the
well-known agnostic historians Will and Ariel Durant explain, thus:
“Certainly sensuality, drunkenness, Coarseness, greed, dishonesty, robbery
and violence existed in the Middle Ages; but probably the moral disorder born of
half a millennium of barbarian invasion, war, economic devastation, and political
disorganization would have been much worse without the moderating effect of
the Christian ethic, priestly exhortations, saintly exemplars, and a calming, unifying
ritual. ... [The] Church labored to reduce slavery, family feuds, and national strife, to
extend the intervals of truce and peace, and to replace trial by combat or ordeal with
the judgments of established courts. It softened the penalties exacted by Roman or
barbarian law, and vastly expanded the scope and organization of charity.” (1968, p.
44)
All these statements call attention to the prediction of the cut-flowers thesis
which, by way of summary, suggests that morality cannot survive without religion.
Some words of caution are needed here though: The cut-flowers thesis does not
say that a consequence of abandoning religion leads immediately to murder,
rape, robbery, drunkenness, sexual promiscuity, and the like. Nor does it say that
the morality per se will soon cease to exist if its ties to religion are cut. However, it
does argue that to have a real ground or reason for moral action, one must admit a
religious or theological foundation.
3. Theistic Ethics : nae
Religions fundamentally endorse theism (the belief in God) and theistic ethics
‘atural being called God is
(God-based morality). Theistic Ethics believes that a superni ‘
the foundation of morality. God is viewed as the true source of: all moral laws, and as
the only plausible cause of moral obligations which posses: overriding and binding
character, Hone theigm - one Hod: ;
Scanned with CamScannerThe theory holds that the tr,
theism, "X is moral” means "gq, 4." 8 moral judgments depends on God's wil. In
we can know God's wil Prop Antsy, or a particular agent to do X." As to how
divinely guided human faeces S admit sources like revelation (Holy Scriptures),
The theory views Ethics as pein" Sods laws writen in man's heart (conscience)
*