ΔΙΠΛΩΜΑΤΙΚΗ nik

6
6.1

,
,
.
6.2
, ,
,
,
. ,

.

. (1999, . 55-58)

,
, .

.

,
,
. ,
,
.
6.3

:
1)
?
2) ?
3)
?
6.4
.
, , ,
, , ... Cohen L. & Manion
L. (1994, . 122) ,

.

,
.
6.5
,
,
, , ,
.
(Cohen L. & Manion L. 1994).
-,
.
.
,
,
.

. (Cohen L. & Manion L.
1994).
6.6

.

,
.

,
.
: ) , )

)
.
(1991):
.
, ,
. ,
.

,

( 1993 :
20)

.

: ) )

.

,
.
.
,
.
,

.
(1993:.23)

.
,

.
6.7
20 .

,
,
.
.
.

, , ,
,
.
,

. (1996: . 154)
,
: ,
. ,
, ,
.

, ,
.

.
:
1. (1-6)
.
2. (7-15)

.
3. (16-20)
.
20
16-17-18
.
6.8
71 , ,
. 2
.
,
.
,
.
, .

, .

.
!
:
(
),
(

) (
, ,
).

.

.
SPSS.
,
.
,
.
.
6.9 SPSS for Windows 14.0

SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences Statistical Product and Service
Solutions)

, ,

,

7 , ,

7.1

.
69
.

7.2
1, 69
, 44 ( 63,8%) 25
( 36,2 %) .
Valid
Frequency
25
44
Percent
36,2
63,8
Valid Percent
36,2
63,8
69
100,0
100,0
Total
Percent
60,0%
40,0%
63,8%
20,0%
36,2%
0,0%
Cumulative
Percent
36,2
100,0
7.3
2 19 ( 27,5%)
30 , 35 ( 50,7%) 31-40 , 10
( 14,5%) 41-50 , 5 ( 7,2%)
50 .
Valid
30
31-40
41-50
50
Total
Cumulative
Percent
27,5
78,3
Frequency
19
35
Percent
27,5
50,7
Valid Percent
27,5
50,7
10
14,5
14,5
92,8
7,2
7,2
100,0
69
100,0
100,0
2:
30
31-40
41-50
50
Pies show counts
7.4
3
35 ( 50,7%) , 13 ( 18,8%) ,19
( 27,5%) , 2 ( 2,9%) .
Valid
Missing
Total
/
/
Frequency
35
13
Percent
50,7
18,8
Valid Percent
52,2
19,4
Cumulative
Percent
52,2
71,6
19
27,5
28,4
100,0
Total
67
97,1
100,0
2,9
69
100,0
System
3: .
.
/
/
/
Pies show counts
7.5

4, 20 ( 29%)
49 ( 71%) .
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
20
29,0
29,0
29,0
49
71,0
71,0
100,0
Total
69
100,0
100,0
4: .
80,0%
Percent
60,0%
40,0%
71,0%
20,0%
29,0%
0,0%

10
7.6

5 4 ( 5,8%) , 4
( 5,8%) , 29 ( 42%) , 7 ( 10,1%)
, 8 ( 11,6%) , 10 ( 14,5%)
7 ( 10,1%) .
.
Valid
Frequency
MHXANIKOI
4
4
.
29
7

8
10
7
Total
69
Percent Valid Percent

5,8
5,8
5,8
5,8
42,0
42,0
10,1
10,1
11,6
11,6
14,5
14,5
10,1
10,1
100,0
100,0
Cumulative
Percent
5,8
11,6
53,6
63,8
75,4
89,9
100,0
.
MHXANIKOI
Pies showcounts
11
7.7
6 , 40
( 58%) , 27 ( 39,1%)
2 ( 2,9 %) .
Valid
Missing
Total
Frequency
40
27
Total
67
System
2
69
Percent Valid Percent

58,0
59,7
39,1
40,3
97,1
100,0
2,9
100,0
Cumulative
Percent
59,7
100,0
60,0%
50,0%
Percent
40,0%
30,0%
59,7%
20,0%
40,3%
10,0%
0,0%
12
7.8
:
.
.
:

7 33
( 47,8%) , 29
( 42%) 7 ( 10,1%) ,
:
1
1 1 -
1 -
Valid
Total
Frequency
33
29
Percent
47,8
42,0
Valid Percent
47,8
42,0
Cumulative
Percent
47,8
89,9
10,1
10,1
100,0
69
100,0
100,0
13
50,0%
Percent
40,0%
30,0%
47,8%
42,0%
20,0%
10,0%
10,1%
0,0%

, 30
, 6
, 5
, 5 , 3 ,
, ,
, , ..
30
6
5
5
3
20
Marketing
14
30
30
25

20
20
15
10
5
0
Marketing
-
9 23 ( 33,3)
, 38 ( 55,1%)
, 8 ( 11,6%) .
Valid

Total
Missing
Total
System
Frequency
23
38
Percent
33,3
55,1
Valid Percent
37,7
62,3
61
88,4
100,0
11,6
69
100,0
9: , .

Pies showcounts
15
Cumulative
Percent
37,7
100,0
7.9
8: ,
? ? ? 47
( 68,1%) ,
22 ( 31,9%) .
Valid

Total
Frequency
47
Percent
68,1
Valid Percent
68,1
Cumulative
Percent
68,1
22
31,9
31,9
100,0
69
100,0
100,0
10
Percent
60,0%
40,0%
68,1%
20,0%
31,9%
0,0%

16
7.10
9:
, 11, 43 ( 62,3%)
, 14 ( 20,3%)
, 12 ( 17,4%) (
).
Valid
Frequency
43
14
Percent
62,3
20,3
Valid Percent
62,3
20,3
Cumulative
Percent
62,3
82,6
100,0
12
17,4
17,4
Total
69
100,0
100,0
11 .
Percent
60,0%
40,0%
62,3%
20,0%
20,3%
17,4%
0,0%
17
__
7.11
10:
/
, 54 ( 78,3%)
15 ( 21,7%) .
Case Summary
a
$_
Cases
Missing
N
Percent
15
21,7%
Valid
N
Percent
54
78,3%
Total
N
Percent
69
100,0%
a. Dichotomy group tabulated at value 1.

,
12, 57,4 %
, ,
44,4% , 37% , 18,5%
9,3% .
Frequencies
Responses
N
(a)
Percent of
Cases
44,4%
57,4%
24
31
Percent
26,4%
34,1%
20
22,0%
37,0%
10
11,0%
18,5%
5,5%
9,3%
1,1%
1,9%
91
100,0%
168,5%
Total
a Dichotomy group tabulated at value 1.
12
: 100% .
18
$_ Frequencies
200,0
Varname
168,5

Total
Values
150,0
100,0
91,0
100,0
57,4
44,4
50,0
31,0
24,0
20,0
10,0
5,01,0
34,1
26,4
22,0
11,0
5,5
1,1
37,0
18,5
9,3
1,9
0,0
Responses N
Responses Percent
Percent of Cases
Statistics

, 26 ( 37,7%)
43 ( 62,3%) .
Case Summary
Cases
Valid
N
$_
26
(a)
Missing
Percent
37,7%
Total
Percent
43
62,3%
Percent
69
100,0%

, 61,5%
, 38,5% ,
26,9% 19,2% .
19
Responses
7
Percent
18,4%
Percent of
Cases
26,9%
16
42,1%
61,5%
13,2%
19,2%
10
26,3%
38,5%
38
100,0%
146,2%
N

/
...1(a)
Total
13: .
: 100% .
$_ Frequencies
146,2
150,0
Varname

Total
100,0
Values
100,0
61,5
38,0
50,0
42,1
26,3
16,0 10,0
7,0
18,4
26,9
38,5
19,2
13,2
5,0
0,0
Responses N
Responses P ercent
Percent of Cases
Statistics
20

:
. ,
. (.16/)
,
,
. (.18/).
,
. (.20/)

. (.25/).
7.12
11:
?, 26 ( 37,7%) 43( 62,3%) .
Case Summary
Cases
Valid
N
$_(
26
a)
Missing
Percent
37,7%
Total
Percent
43
62,3%
Percent
69
100,0%
, 53.8%

, 42,3% , 15,4%
, 11,5%
7,7% .
21
Responses
4
Percent
11,8%
Percent of
Cases
15,4%
14
41,2%
53,8%
11
32,4%
42,3%
5,9%
7,7%
N

...
(a)

Total
8,8%
11,5%
34
100,0%
130,8%
14
: 100% .
$_ Frequencies
130,8
Varname
125,0
100,0
100,0
Values

Total
75,0
41,2
50,0
25,0
53,8
42,3
34,0
11,0
14,0
4,0
3,0
2,0
Responses N
32,4
11,8
8,8
5,9
Responses Percent
15,4
11,5
7,7
Percent of Cases
Statistics
22
7.13
12:

? 55 14 .
Statistics

N
Valid
55
Missing
14
, 17( 30,9%) ,

, 38 ( 69,1%)
.

Valid
Missing
Frequency
38
17
Percent
55,1
24,6
Valid Percent
69,1
30,9
Total
55
79,7
100,0
System
14
20,3
69
100,0
Total
Cumulative
Percent
69,1
100,0
Percent
60,0%
40,0%
69,1%
20,0%
30,9%
0,0%
23
7.14
13:
,
Case Summary
Cases
Valid
N

Missing
Percent
38
Total
Percent
55,1%
31
44,9%
Percent
69
100,0%

(46,3%)
: , ,
,
.

.
$_ Frequencies
Responses
19
Percent
32,2%
Percent of
Cases
46,3%
13,6%
19,5%
13,6%
19,5%
11,9%
17,1%
17,1%
(a)

Total
11,9%
10
16,9%
24,4%
59
100,0%
143,9%
15
: 100% .
24
_ Frequencies
143,9
Values
125,0
100,0
100,0
75,0
59,0
46,3
19,5
50,0
8,0
19,0
25,0
7,0
8,0
Responses N
10,0
7,0
32,2
13,6
19,5
17,1 24,4
17,1
16,9
11,9
13,6
11,9
Responses Percent
Percent of Cases
Statistics
Varname

Total
:
. (.11/).
,
. (.25/)
.
(.34/).
.
. (.40/).

. (.54/)
25
7.15
14:
? 68 1 .
51( 75%)
17 ( 24,6%) .
Statistics

N
Valid
68
Missing
1
Valid
Total
Missing
Total
System
Frequency
51
17
Percent
73,9
24,6
Valid Percent
75,0
25,0
68
98,6
100,0
1,4
69
100,0
Cumulative
Percent
75,0
100,0
16
25
75
26
7.16
15:
, 47 ( 68,1%),

Cases
Valid
N
$__
(a)
Missing
Percent
47
68,1%
Total
Percent
22
31,9%
Percent
69
100,0%

38,3 %
,
: ,
,
, ,
.
,

, .

.
$__ Frequencies
Responses
16
Percent
21,6%
Percent of
Cases
34,0%
6,8%
10,6%
6,8%
10,6%
2,7%
4,3%
4,1%
6,4%
9,5%
14,9%
18
24,3%
38,3%
12
16,2%
25,5%
(a)
Total
8,1%
12,8%
74
100,0%
157,4%
17

: 100% .
27
$__ Frequencies
157,4
Values
150,0
100,0
100,0
74,0
38,3
34,0
50,0
5,0
16,0
2,0
18,0
12,0
6,0
7,0
6,8
21,6
6,8
2,7 9,5
4,1
25,5
10,6
24,3
16,2
8,1
10,6
14,9
6,4
12,8
4,3
5,0 3,0
0,0
Responses N
Responses Percent
Percent of Cases
Statistics
Varname

Total
:
.
(.8/).

.
.
( ,
). (.11/)

. (.29/).
28
. (.33/)
.(.35/)
.
(.38/)
, ,
. (.44/)

. (.69/)

15 ( 21,7%) .
Case Summary
Cases
Valid
N
$__
_(a)
Missing
Percent
15
21,7%
Total
Percent
54
78,3%
Percent
69
100,0%

, ,
.

.
29
$___ Frequencies
Responses
3
Percent
15,8%
Percent of
Cases
20,0%
10
52,6%
66,7%
26,3%
33,3%
(a)
Total
5,3%
6,7%
19
100,0%
126,7%
18
: 100% .
$___ Frequencies
126,7
125,0
100,0
Values
100,0
66,7
75,0
52,6
50,0
33,3
26,3
19,0
25,0
10,0
3,0
5,0
6,7
5,3
1,0
Responses N
20,0
15,8
Responses Percent
Percent of Cases
Statistics
Varname

Total
30
:
.
.
,
. (.25/)

(, , .)

. (.4/)
.
(.30/)
. (.65/).

7.17
16:
? , 68 (
98,6%) 1 .
Case Summary
Cases
Valid
N
$__
(a)
Missing
Percent
68
98,6%
Total
Percent
1
1,4%
Percent
69
100,0%
, (47,1%) ,

, 44,1%
, 32,4% , 25%
, 20,6% -,

,
, ,
, .
31
19

.
Responses
14
Percent
10,8%
Percent of
Cases
20,6%
,8%
1,5%
2,3%
4,4%
30
23,1%
44,1%
17
13,1%
25,0%
22
16,9%
32,4%
32
24,6%
47,1%
3,1%
5,9%
1,5%
2,9%
3,1%
5,9%
,8%
1,5%
130
100,0%
191,2%
(a)
Total
19: .
: 100% .
32
$__ Frequencies
191,2
Varname
150,0
Values
100,0

Total
100,0
50,0
0,0
Responses N
Responses Percent
Percent of Cases
Statistics
:
. (.8/)
.(.10/)

.(.11/).

. (.15/)

.(.18/

. (.36/)

.(.43/)
33

. (.44/)
,
. .
(.54/).
7.18
17:
? 67( 97,1%)
, 2 .
Case Summary
Cases
Valid
N
$_
_
(a)
Missing
Percent
67
97,1%
Total
Percent
2
2,9%
Percent
69
100,0%
, 17,9 %
. ,
(25,4%) ,

, 23,9%
, 20,9 %
, 17,9% , 14%
,
,
, ,
, ,
.
20

.
34
Responses
12
17
Percent
10,8%
15,3%
Percent of
Cases
17,9%
25,4%
2,7%
4,5%
16
14,4%
23,9%
(a)
10
9,0%
14,9%
3,6%
6,0%
5,4%
9,0%
1,8%
3,0%
5,4%
9,0%
3,6%
6,0%
2,7%
4,5%
14
12,6%
20,9%
1,8%
3,0%
12
10,8%
17,9%
111
100,0%
165,7%
Total
20 .
: 100% .
35
$_ _ Frequencies
Varname

150,0

Total

Values
100,0
50,0
0,0
Responses N
Responses P ercent
P ercent of Cases
Statistics
:
,
.
, ,

,
.(.
17/).
36
7.19
.
18: ,
1 5 ( 1
5)
, 62 7 .
Statistics
Valid
Missing
1
62
7
2
62
7
3
62
7
4
62
7
5
62
7

, - ,
, ,
.

:
1
71%
2
14,50%
3
4,80%
4
4,80%
5
4,80%
12,90%
11,30%
3,20%
1,60%
32,30%
22,60%
19,40%
11,30%
22,60%
37,10%
24,20%
11,30%
21%
14,50%
30,60%
29%
11,30%
14,50%
22,60%
46,80%
21
37
7.20
19:
67(
97,1) 2 .
Case Summary
Cases
Valid
N
$_
(a)
Missing
Percent
67
Total
Percent
97,1%
2,9%
Percent
69
100,0%
( 68,7%)

,
, , ,
, , ,
, .

.
$_ Frequencies
Responses
46
13
Percent
36,5%
10,3%
Percent of
Cases
68,7%
19,4%
(a
)
5,6%
10,4%
10
7,9%
14,9%
24
19,0%
35,8%
4,8%
9,0%
13
10,3%
19,4%
2,4%
4,5%
2,4%
4,5%
,8%
1,5%
126
100,0%
188,1%
Total
22
: 100% .
38
$_ Frequencies
188,1
Varname

Values
150,0
126,0

Total
100,0
100,0
50,0
0,0
Responses NResponses Percent
Percent of Cases
Statistics
:
, , ,
. (.68/)
, . (.35/)
. (.43/)

,
. (.56/)
,
. (.69/)
39
7.21
20:
?
57( 82,6%) 12 .
Case Summary
Cases
Valid
N
$_
_(a)
Missing
Percent
57
82,6%
Total
Percent
12
17,4%
Percent
69
100,0%
, (86%)
, .
$__ Frequencies
Responses
49
Percent
59,8%
Percent of
Cases
86,0%
16
19,5%
28,1%
9,8%
14,0%
11,0%
15,8%
82
100,0%
143,9%
(
a)
Total
23
: 100% .
40
$__ Frequencies
143,9
Varname

Total
125,0
Values
100,0
100,0
86,0
82,0
75,0
59,8
49,0
50,0
28,1
25,0
16,0
8,0 9,0
Responses N
19,5
9,8 11,0
Responses Percent
14,015,8
Percent of Cases
Statistics
,
, (46,7%)

,
.
Case Summary
Cases
Valid
N
$_
_(a)
Missing
Percent
60
87,0%
41
Total
Percent
9
13,0%
Percent
69
100,0%
$__ Frequencies
Responses
N
(
a)
Percent
Percent of
Cases
4,1%
8,3%
5,7%
11,7%
5,7%
11,7%
10
8,1%
16,7%
18
14,6%
30,0%
1,6%
3,3%
4,1%
8,3%
6,5%
13,3%
2,4%
5,0%
14
11,4%
23,3%
28
22,8%
46,7%
16
13,0%
26,7%
123
100,0%
205,0%
Total
24
: 100% .
42
__ Frequencies
Values
200,0
150,0
100,0
50,0
0,0
Responses N
Varname

Responses Percent
Statistics
Percent of Cases

Total
43
8
.
,
.
8.1

,
.
,
, ,
,
.
8.1.1

,
, .

,
, .
8.1.2
.

.
,
,
,
.
,
,
- - .

.
44

,
.

, , ,
, ,
.

(Jaques, 2004). Freire (1977)
,
.
,
,

. ,

.
,
,
. , , ,
,

, (, 2003).
,
,
.
8.1.3 .

, ,
.
,
, ,
,
.

, ,
.
45
,
,

.
8.1.4

.
.

( )
,
. :
, ,
.
,
.
8.1.5
.

.

Rogers (Rogers, 1999) :
1. ,
2.
( , ,
.)
3. , ( ).
,
,

.
,
. ,

.
46
8.1.6 ,
.
,
.

.

. :
,
.

,
,
, .
, ,

. ,

.
Rogers ,
,
, .
(Rogers, 2001).
,
,
.

.
,
.
47
8. 2
8.2.1 .

.

,
,
.
,

.
.

.
.
,

.

.
,
. . ,

.

,

.
48
8.2.2 .

.

. ,

( ) ( ,
).
, ,
.
,
:
, , , ,
, ,

.

.
-
, , ,

.
.
,

, ,
.
, .
49
9 .
,
, ,

.

,

.
.
,
.

:
1)
,
.
2)
,
.
3) ,

,
, .
( ).

.
,

4)
,
.
.
,

, ,
.

:
50
1)
, .
2) (Rogers, 1999)
: )
, )
)
.
3)

,

.

, , .
,
,

,
.
4) ,

.

, :
1)
,
- .

.
2)
.
,

.
51
10

,

.

,

- .

,

.
52
Atkinson J.W. (1964), An Introduction to Motivation, Princeton, New Jersey :

Van Nostrand.
A, .-.(1999) . .
-, .-. , . , & .
(.), , ,
. : , . 21
Bell, J., 1997, .
. . Gutenberg.
Boekaerts, M., (2002). Motivation to learn, International Academy of Education,
Unesco, Educational Practies Series, No10.
Bove, Courtland L., Thill, John V. (1992) Instructor's resource manual to
accompany business communication today, McGraw-Hill
B, . (1991),
. :
B . (.) (2003). ,
, , . .
B, . (1999).
, : .
. , .
B, ., , . (1999). .
. , , ...
Carre Ph. (2000), Motivation in Adult Education: from Engagement to
performance. Adult Education Research Conference: 41st, Vancouver, Canada
Cohen L., Manion L. (1994), , .
., ., ,
Courau, S. (2000).
., , . .
, .,(1993), () .
, , .
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985a). The general causality orientation scale: Selfdetermination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality,19, 109134.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985b). Causality orientations theory: Personality
influences on motivation. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.),Intrinsic motivation
and self-determination in human behavior (pp.149175). New York: Plenum.
Deci, E., &Ryan, R., (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and selfdetermination in
human behavior., New York. Plenum.
53
Deci, E., Vallerand,R., Pelletier L., Ryan, R., (1991). Motivation und
education: The selfdetermination perspective, The Educational
Psychologist.26,325-346.
Festinger, L. (1978). Die Theorie der kognitiven Dissonanz. Bern.Huber.
Freire P.(1977), , ,
Houle, C.O. (1961): 'The Inquiring Mind: A Study of the Adult Who Continues
to Learn' Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Jaques, D., (2004). ,
, , .
Jarvis, P.(2003). . ,
. . . :
Knox A. (1977), Adult Development and Learning, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco,.
K . (2007),
: , ,
,
K, . (1998). . : . &
., . -.
. : .
K, . (2005). . . :
.
K, . , . (1998).
, - .
. .
K, ., (1999). . , ,
, . .
K, ., (2002). " :
, , ", . ().
. .
K-, . ,(1998), , , .
.
Leavit H. J. (1964). Managerial Psychology. University of Chicago Press, p.307,
Chicago.
Lewin K (1935) Dynamic theory of personality. McGraw-Hill.
ayo, E., (1933). The human problems of an industrial civilization. New York.
MacMilan.
McCall R.J, (1963). Invested self-expression: a principle of human motivation.
Psychology Review. Jul. 70, 289-303.
McClelland, D., (1953). Towards a theory of motive acquisition. American
Psychologist, 20, 321-333.
McClelland, D.C. - Atkinson, J.W. - Clark, R.W. - Lowell, E.L. (1953) The
Achievement Motive, New York : Appleton-Century-Crofts.
McDougall, W., (1998). An introduction to social psychology, Bristol.
Thoemmes.
54
Murray, E.J., (1967). Motivation och emotion-om manniskans drivkafter och

kanslo,Stockholm. Wahlstrom and Widstrand
Noe, R. A. (1986). Trainees' attributes and attitudes: neglected influences on
training effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 11, pp. 736-749.
Noye D., Piveteau J., , , , 2002
(2 .).
Pavlov, J.P. (1979). . :
. ..
Premack, D.,(1971). Catching up with common sense, or two sides of
ageneralization: Reinforcement and punishment. In Glaser, R. (Ed.), The nature
of reinforcement. New York. Academic Press.
., (1993) , 1,
- . (2005),
, ,
. (2003),
. , . 10
Rogers C., Freedom to Learn for the 80's, Merril-McMillan, N. York, 1983
Rogers, J. (1989) Adults Learning, Milton Keynes Philadelphia, Open University
Press
Rogers, , ( 1998 ). E . . .
Rogers,J. (2001), Adults learning, Open University Press, Buchingham;
Philadelphia (3 ).
Vallerand, R. & Thill, E. (dir.) (1993). Introduction a la psychologie de la
motivation. Paris Q Vigot
Vallerand, R. (1997) Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic
motivation. Advances in experimental social psychology, 29, 271-360. Academic
Press
Vroom, V., (1995). Work and motivation. San Fransisco. Jossey-Bass.
Weiner, ., (1985). Human Motivation. New York. Springer-Verlag
, ., (1996),
, , ., Gutenberg.
55

1) :
2) :) 30 ) 31-40 ) 41-50 ) 50
3) :
) /
) /
) /
4) : )
)
5) :
6) :
)
)
7)
. :
)
.
) ,
) -
) ,
8) , ?
? ?
56
.
9) ? /?
..
10)
/
11) ?
.
12) ,

?
13)
. .
14)
?
57
15) .
16)
?
( )
17)
? ( )
.
18)
? ( 1 5, 1
5).
) .
) .
)
)
) ,
19)
.
..
58
20)
;
.
59

ΔΙΠΛΩΜΑΤΙΚΗ nik

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ΔΙΠΛΩΜΑΤΙΚΗ nik

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

6

6.9 SPSS for Windows 14.0

Percent Valid Percent

Percent Valid Percent

a. Dichotomy group tabulated at value 1.

a Dichotomy group tabulated at value 1.

a Dichotomy group tabulated at value 1.

a Dichotomy group tabulated at value 1.

a Dichotomy group tabulated at value 1.

a Dichotomy group tabulated at value 1.

a Dichotomy group tabulated at value 1.

a Dichotomy group tabulated at value 1.

a Dichotomy group tabulated at value 1.

a Dichotomy group tabulated at value 1.

a Dichotomy group tabulated at value 1.

Atkinson J.W. (1964), An Introduction to Motivation, Princeton, New Jersey :

Murray, E.J., (1967). Motivation och emotion-om manniskans drivkafter och

You might also like