Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Student’s name
Institution name
Date
2
Background
It is challenging working with a chronic condition. For workers with such conditions to
stay at work and evade such work-related problems, they need support. Therefore, effective and
supportive interventions for preventing exit from jobs by these people and enhancing sustainable
employment can be enhanced by such survivors. This paper will analyze a teenager, 19 years old,
with chronic pain due to down syndrome resulting from an individual having an additional
chromosome responsible for the formation of our bodies and its functioning during gestation and
after birth. The extra chromosome is a type of chromosome 21 called trisomy 21, which alters
the development of the brain and body, causing both physical and mental problems later in life.
The disease causes different abilities in different persons despite similar actions and
characteristics. These individuals have lower IQ and learn how to speak slowly. The standard
features of the down syndrome include; flattened face, a shorter neck, tongue hanging out of the
mouth, small hands and feet, tiny and pink-like fingers, loose joints, spots on the iris, small ears,
almond eyes shape and are always short. These individuals have common facial characteristics
and no significant congenital disabilities. However, other medical conditions or minor congenital
disabilities are common (Shaw et al.,2014). These include; hearing loss, ear infections, heart
defects at birth, obstructive sleep recess, and eye diseases. It is a lifetime condition. Therefore,
kids with this condition are offered services that only enhance their physical and intellectual
abilities to increase their full development potential. The most common medical services for this
condition include; speech, physical and occupational therapies. With most kids suffering from
these conditions in regular classes, extra help and attention improve their learning ability.
3
Method
Participants were employees with chronic health conditions. Most of them showed
interest in the project aimed at enhancing managing and functioning at work. Most recruitments
were done in hospitals, technology firms, and regional healthcare systems. All participants were
above 18 years of age and working full time at least 20 hours a week. They were also required to
have at least a history of one chronic condition that had lasted for more than half a year.
However, the study did not require medical information proof to reduce health disclosure and
enhance privacy (Shaw et al.,2021). Another inclusion criterion was the ability of participants to
read and speak English. Individuals who were unable to attend workshops before, during, and
after lunch breaks and those retiring or changing jobs within the next year were excluded.
focusing on workplace and public place challenges. Despite chronic conditions episodic
symptoms, the goal was to improve the personal perception of ability to work, enhance
accommodation of people with such disabilities, and acknowledge the efforts they put at work,
reducing ridicule cases (Petere et al.,2020). The basis of the intervention was on qualitative
findings and a review of available management intervention elements. Coaching, learning, and
skill development as an aid to self-management at the workplace is the primary goal of the
intervention. The primary focus is on controlling workplace and public area challenges,
Resources (method)
4
First was a comparison between the intervention and control group baseline
demographics and health variables. Through this analysis, it was concluded that randomization
could or could not lead to equivalence. The coefficients included all statistically significant
group differences (Kersemaekers et al., 2018). The primary analytic strategy of a repeated
measure general linear model was to analyze changes in the outcome measures by comparing
intervention and control groups. The between-subject and within-subject factors were group
statistically significant group versus time interaction (p=0.05) in repeated measures. Finally, the
IBM SPSS statistics were used in the analysis of the whole project.
Process (procedure)
Email announcements and flyers were used to publicize the project in the entire
workplace. In workplace injuries or no disabilities, occupational health and safety staff referred
individuals who showed such chronic health conditions. The project coordinator provided
information to interested participants on the local site. They were responsible for answering any
surveys. Group intervention or wait-list arm received randomization from the research offices.
contacting the individuals in the treatment arm. With information on research enrollment
remaining confidential, the potential threat to internal validity was contamination due to similar
A follow-up survey of approximately half an hour was done six months after enrollment.
The study associates contacted both intervention and control groups of participants. A baseline
5
survey was that completed in private locations by participants electronically and on-site. Email
message prompts were sent to participants with links for survey completion upon completing the
half-year follow-up survey online. A slight appreciation was sent to the participants upon
completion of the survey. The participants provided demographic data and coefficient baseline
measures, including primary outcomes. A similar type of measure was in the follow-up survey.
The study uses a group psycho-education format to present strategies to enhance working
and public challenges experienced by people suffering from chronic pain. Despite the recurrent
episodic symptoms, the finding is important since they add to the growing literature on the
struggles of young and ill workers. Both in the occupational rehabilitation and public space
literature, workplace intervention strategies for these individuals are limited. The past studies
only provided the potential effects of health on work performance. However, this project
provides emotional struggles of young employees to maintain social relations, develop and
For workers with chronic conditions with intermittent symptoms and lack of a
The successful recruitment of sick workers, holding safe and convenient meetings, promoting
work were reported. Therefore, the workers’ efforts in attaining demanded assistance, including
expanded. The downside of this approach is its reliance on employees to request adaptations in
6
the workspaces. The idea of promoting assertive communication was the basis of the
communication module training. However, the organizational cultures, work relations, and codes
Work engagement and disadvantages are the primary outcome measures. Work
unable and isolated, and facing disconnection from work entail the negative feeling in
individuals from chronic pain conditions. Beliefs can be addressed through self-management
intervention and thus, achieved through identifying opportunities for positive change, devising
ways to enlighten managers on their needs, and overcoming challenges through a sense of
mastery (Bosma et al.,2020). Hence, increased interests and functionality in daily workloads,
The work limitation questionnaire is another primary outcome measure in the project. In
engagement. Its purpose was to quantify work productivity attributed to medical conditions.
Thus, its perceived ability to perform physically demanding aspects of the project was not met.
The reason behind this is its inability to respond to short-term interventions compared to other
published trials of previous studies (Ilić Petković, 2020). Additionally, there is less concern for
productivity performance than physical well-being among employees with chronic health
conditions. Therefore, the focus on enhancing well-being and performance may lead to future
The provision of health coaching, counseling, and educational programs to all employees,
including those from chronic health conditions, are important practical implications. In achieving
7
this, specially trained counselors for intervention programs are essential. These counselors offer
intense training essential for these workers' mental and physical well-being, thus offering an
increased attachment to their routine tasks. Thus, improved dedication and commitment of
workers with chronic health issues may result from increased chances for managing workplace
Furthermore, there was enhanced communication between managers and employees with
chronic health conditions in the participating institutions, particularly on their health statuses
with minimal or no-hit backs or punitive treatment. Both physical and cognitive demands of the
workspace are increasing now and will continue in the future. As a risk factor in the working
environments, studies on mental and physical strain need to be adjusted to minimize such cases
in the workplaces (Gould-Werth et al.,2018). Moreover, through this project, a systematic and
organizational context, knowledge work tasks, and working conditions for these individuals,
interventions. A more sustainable and impact on workers’ health results from a changing
psychological factors, work conditions, and social factors. It is essential to focus on preventing
and offering sustainable employment opportunities due to increased numbers of workers with
8
chronic conditions. Combining other efforts with these findings in future studies will be
References
Bosma, A. R., Boot, C. R. L., Schaafsma, F. G., & Anema, J. R. (2020). Facilitators, barriers and
support needs for staying at work with a chronic condition: a focus group study. BMC
Bosma, A. R., Boot, C. R. L., Schaafsma, F. G., Kok, G., & Anema, J. R. (2020). We are
rehabilitation, 30(4), 624.
Holzgreve, F., Maltry, L., Lampe, J., Schmidt, H., Bader, A., Rey, J., ... & Ohlendorf, D.(2018).
The office work and stretch training (OST) study: an individualized and standardized
Ilić Petković, A., & Nikolić, V. (2020). Educational needs of employees in work-related stress
management. Work, 65(3), 661-669.
Kalakoski, V., Selinheimo, S., Valtonen, T., Turunen, J., Käpykangas, S., Ylisassi, H., ... &
Kersemaekers, W., Rupprecht, S., Wittmann, M., Tamdjidi, C., Falke, P., Donders, R., ... &
Peters, S. E., Nielsen, K. M., Nagler, E. M., Revette, A. C., Madden, J., & Sorensen, G.
e33-e45.
Shaw, W. S., Besen, E., Pransky, G., Booth, C. R., Nicholas, M. K., McLellan, R. K., &Tveito,
Shaw, W. S., McLellan, R. K., Besen, E., Namazi, S., Nicholas, M. K., Dugan, A. G., &Tveito,
References