State of Ecommerce Marketing

THE STATE OF
ECOMMERCE
MARKETING
Author Profile
Sam Mallikarjunan
Sam is the author of the book “How to Sell Better Than
Amazon” (yes - it’s ironically available on Amazon) and
the Head of Ecommerce Marketing @ HubSpot. Feel free
to connect with him if you have comments or questions
on this report specifically or ecommerce marketing in
general!
Expert Analysis By
Greg Wise
Principal Ecommerce Inbound Marketing Expert
Ted Ammon
Morgan Jacobson
CONTENTS
1. Inbound Marketing Adoption
2. Blogging
3. Company Focus & Priorities
4. Customer Segmentation
5. Customer Education
6. Marketing Spend
7. Visits and Customer Sources
8. Personalization
9. Shopping Cart Insights
10. Cart Nurturing
11. Survey Methodology
5 THE STATE OF ECOMMERCE MARKETING
Introduction
Welcome to HubSpot’s first annual State of
Ecommerce Marketing Report.
At HubSpot, our founding mission is to

transform the way people do marketing.
The traditional methods of reaching people
through interruptive and annoying tactics
are disappearing – and those that aren’t
are becoming increasingly expensive and
ineffective. Further, these high pressure tactics
are counterproductive to building long-term
relationships with customers.
We also believe engaging consumers means much more than simply

finding the newest channel to push out a message to the masses. Instead,
marketing today is about understanding how consumers research and
make purchase decisions in this hyper-connected, digital world. It’s about
meeting them at every stage of that decision by integrating relevant content
with context on your consumers. It’s about a unified process of attracting
audience, converting prospects, closing leads, and delighting customers in
ways they actually desire.
Every year, HubSpot releases the State of Inbound Marketing report

analyzing the tools, tactics, and results of thousands of marketers around the
world.
www.Hubspot.com
This year, HubSpot is also releasing the results of our first State of
Ecommerce Marketing report, drilling down more specifically into the multi-
trillion dollar world of ecommerce marketers. We expanded the survey far
beyond HubSpot’s ecommerce customers (with only 5% of respondents
reporting that they use HubSpot’s ecommerce marketing software), and the
results are very interesting.
Some interesting conclusions from the data are less encouraging than
others. Ecommerce marketers as a whole are still lagging behind B2B
marketers in adopting inbound practices like social media or blogging.
Ecommerce marketers as a whole are still not measuring basic metrics
like shopping cart abandonment rates, much less actively engaging those
customers to bring them back with personalized experiences.
What is encouraging is the data from marketers who are measuring and
marketing in a customer-centric way. Marketers who focus on creating
customer-centric experiences are more likely to see a Return On Investment
(ROI) from their inbound marketing activities, and marketers who choose
to use content over coupons also see a higher ROI. There are some other
interesting pieces of data, such as the fact that a customer abandoning a
shopping cart once may not be a bad thing like we always assume - and
may in fact lead to higher spending when marketed to appropriately.
We are incredibly excited to share our first State of Ecommerce Marketing

Report with you. We welcome any and all questions and feedback as well:
research@hubspot.com.
www.Hubspot.com
What is Inbound Marketing?

Inbound marketing is a holistic, data-driven strategy that involves attracting
and converting visitors into customers through personalized, relevant
information and content - not interruptive messages - and following them
through the sales experience with ongoing engagement.
Since 2006, inbound marketing has been the most effective marketing
method for doing business online. Instead of the old outbound marketing
methods of buying ads, buying email lists, and paying for leads, inbound
marketing focuses on creating quality content that pulls people toward
your company and product, where they naturally want to be. By aligning
the content you publish with your customer’s interests, you naturally attract
inbound traffic that you can then convert, close, and delight over time.
www.Hubspot.com
A Note On Channel Distinction

There are digital marketing tactics that are specifically designed as “inbound
marketing” and those that are not. While it’s easy to explain why direct mail
and PPC banner ads are “outbound,” it is more complicated to define more
flexible online strategies as purely inbound versus outbound. At HubSpot,
we see the distinguishing factor as how people are using a specific channel
more than the definition of the channel itself. In the simplest sense, it’s about
consumer choice.
For example, depending on how it is deployed,

the email channel often can be considered
either inbound or outbound. One-off, non-
permission based email blasts (SPAM) are
nearly always bucketed as outbound, because
they aim to interrupt people’s inboxes.
However, as a part of an opt-in, nurturing
strategy, email is a terrific complement to other
inbound techniques. Similarly, if you were to
simply send out 200 tweets a day announcing
a “new special,” you wouldn’t really be doing
inbound marketing. An inbound marketing relationship goes both ways
between the business and the individual customer.
www.Hubspot.com
Inbound Marketing Adoption

Inbound marketing methodologies are becoming the
norm among ecommerce marketers.
Stat: 55% of ecommerce businesses invest in inbound marketing, and 22% of respondents
don’t know if they do inbound marketing at all.
60%
55%
50%
40%
30%
22%
20%
10%
0%
Implements Inbound Marke:ng Does Not Implement Inbound Marke:ng
Expert Analysis: 23% of respondents not knowing if they do inbound marketing or not
is not too surprising, given how relatively new the methodology is (much less the term to
describe it). It’s encouraging to see 55% of respondents self-identifying as using inbound
marketing methodologies.
Ted Ammon
www.Hubspot.com
B2B Ecommerce marketers still lead in overall In-

bound Marketing Adoption.
Stat: 54% of B2C ecommerce companies implement inbound marketing, compared to

60% of B2B ecommerce companies.
70%
60%
60%
54%
50%
40%
30%
24%
21%
20%
10%
0%
B2B B2C
Implements Inbound Marke=ng Does Not Implement Inbound Marke=ng
Expert Analysis: B2B companies continue to adopt inbound marketing at a slightly high-
er rate than B2C companies. This has stayed constant over the last several years. It may
be due in part to the economic contractions that affected B2B companies more heavily
than B2C companies in the past few years when inbound marketing was first being de-
veloped as a cohesive methodology. As competition in B2C ecommerce increases dra-
matically, adoption of inbound marketing methodologies is growing as well.
Morgan Jacobson
www.Hubspot.com
Larger revenue businesses lag in adopting inbound

marketing.
Stat: Only 19% of companies with more than $50MM in annual revenue are using in-
bound marketing.
45%
39%
40%
35%
30%
30%
25%
25% 22%
19% 18%
20% 17%
15% 14%
11%
10%
5%
5%
0%
0 -‐ $100,000 $100,001 -‐ $1,000,001 -‐ $10,000,001 -‐ Over $50,000,000
$1,000,000 $10,000,000 $50,000,000
Implements Inbound MarkeAng Does Not Implement Inbound MarkeAng
Expert Analysis: Large businesses have lagged in adopting inbound marketing, usually
because control of the decision-making process is more decentralized and they’re less
likely to make big changes quickly.
Greg Wise
www.Hubspot.com
Large companies lag in adopting inbound marketing.
Stat: Only 32% of companies with more than 50 employees are doing inbound market-
ing.
45%
40%
40%
35%
30%
25% 22%
20%
15%
15%
11%
10%
6% 6%
5%
0%
1 -‐ 5 6 -‐ 25 26 -‐ 50 51 -‐ 200 201 -‐ 500 More than 500
Implements Inbound Marke<ng
Expert Analysis: With more cooks in the kitchen, the decision to adopt a disruptive
marketing methodology like inbound takes more time and has more opportunities to get
killed by the stakeholders. As with most “new” things, smaller and more agile companies
are more likely to adopt them.
Ted Ammon
www.Hubspot.com
Blogging
Adoption by marketers.
Stat: 67% of marketers at ecommerce companies invest in blogging.
33%
67%
Invests in Blogging Does Not Invest in Blogging
Expert Analysis: Blogging is gaining rapid adoption in ecommerce, with fewer firms able
to grow sales while ignoring it entirely.
Morgan Jacobson
www.Hubspot.com
Marketer investment in frequency.
Stat: 47% of marketers at ecommerce companies blog at least once a week, with 14%
of marketers blogging at least once every day.
40%
35% 33%
30%
25%
20%
20%
14%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Once a day Once a week Once a month
Blogging Frequency
Expert Analysis: As adoption of blogging as a marketing method grows, ecommerce

marketers are investing more heavily in building an audience and providing more entry
points through organic search by blogging more frequently.
Greg Wise
www.Hubspot.com
B2C vs. B2B ecommerce blogging adoption.
Stat: 64% of B2B inbound commerce companies blog at least once a week, while 71%
of B2C inbound commerce companies blog at least once a week.
80%
71%
70% 64% 66%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
B2B B2C Both
Invests in Blogging
Expert Analysis: B2C ecommerce companies are adopting blogging at a slightly faster
rate, possibly because B2B ecommerce firms can rely more heavily on sales reps and
account managers to educate prospects and nurture them through the initial buying cy-
cle.
Ted Ammon
www.Hubspot.com
Blogging adoption based on company priorities.
Stat: Companies that describe themselves as “customer focused” are 24% more likely to
blog at least once a week than companies that describe themselves as “sales focused”.
80% 75%
70%
60%
60%
50%
40%
40%
30% 25%
20%
10%
0%
Sales focused Customer focused
Expert Analysis: Although “customer centricity” is still an imprecisely defined term

within the industry as a whole, ecommerce firms that self-identify more strongly with that
term are more likely to focus on creating content that addresses a broader range of cus-
tomer education topics than firms who self-identify as being sales, product, or marketing
focused.
Morgan Jacobson
www.Hubspot.com
Blogging and Inbound Marketing ROI.
Stat: 72% of people who saw ROI from inbound marketing blog at least once a week,
and people who blog are 155% more likely to see ROI from inbound marketing.
28%
72%
Expert Analysis: With blogging being such a fundamental part of inbound marketing,
those who focus exclusively on other aspects of inbound marketing (such as On-Page
SEO) without investing in blogging are less likely to see an ROI. In addition, blogging at
least once a week dramatically increases the value that survey respondents report from
inbound marketing as a whole.
Greg Wise
www.Hubspot.com
Blogging and Customer Life Time Value.
Stat: Companies that are focused on increasing customer life time value are 216% more
likely to invest in blogging. 78% of ecommerce companies are focused on increasing
customer LTV and are investing in blogging.
90%
78%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
22%
20%
10%
0%
Expert Analysis: Ecommerce companies that are focused on growing customer life time
value in addition to new customer acquisition are investing more heavily in blogging than
companies focused primarily on new customer acquisition. These companies tend to use
blog content in marketing automation to re-engage contacts and up-sell/cross-sell/re-sell
items with educational content before using discount or coupon incentives.
Ted Ammon
www.Hubspot.com
Success in organic search optimization and blogging.
Stat: 69% of companies whose major source of customers was from organic & direct
traffic blog at least once a week.
80%
69%
70%
60%
50%
40%
31%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Expert Analysis: In addition to more traffic from organic search, ecommerce firms that
invest heavily (meaning at least one original blog article per week) tend to see more sales
from organic and direct traffic. Blogging is becoming a more indispensable part of an
organic search engine optimization strategy.
Morgan Jacobson
www.Hubspot.com
Company Focus & Priorities

Customer centricity is on the rise.
Stat: Overall, 40% of inbound commerce companies are customer focused.
8%
20%
25%
40%
Sales focused Customer focused Product focused Marke9ng focused
Expert Analysis: It’s good to see more companies consciously focusing on customer
centricity, although the vague definitions of “customer centricity” and the number of peo-
ple who claim to be customer centric but don’t engage in “customer-centric” activities
(such as using content and marketing automation to increase customer lifetime value or
educate prospective customers) means that people may self-identify as “customer fo-
cused” emotionally without practically being so.
Greg Wise
www.Hubspot.com
Stat: Customer centric ecommerce companies are 107% more likely to see an ROI from
inbound marketing than sales focused companies.
50%
44%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25% 21% 21%
20%
15%
9%
10%
5%
0%
Sales focused Customer focused Product focused Marke;ng focused
Company Focus
See ROI from Inbound Marke;ng
Expert Analysis: A fascinating statistic that dramatically validates the “Customer Cen-
tricity” narrative. Companies that are sales focused, which an earlier statistic affirmed
meant primarily focused on the initial transaction, are significantly less likely to see an
ROI from inbound marketing. It’s still telling, however, that a significant portion of respon-
dents in each category don’t know or aren’t able to tell if they’re getting an ROI from their
marketing. This indicates a lack of access to closed-loop marketing analytics. It’s very
telling that neither sales- nor marketing-focused companies had a majority of respon-
dents say that they saw an ROI from inbound, whereas customer- and product-focused
companies did. Product focused companies are also, in a way, highly customer focused
because of their focus on the end user’s requirements and feedback.
Ted Ammon
www.Hubspot.com
Smaller companies tend to be more customer focused.
Stat: Very small businesses (less than 50 employees) are 145% more likely to self-iden-
tify as customer centric than large companies (more than 200 employees), which tend to
be more product focused (with 40% of large companies self-identifying as product cen-
tric).
45% 42%
40%
40%
35%
35%
29%
30% 27%
25%
25% 23% 23%
19%
20%
15%
11%
10% 8%
5%
5%
0%
Customer focused Product focused Sales focused Marke=ng focused
Small (1 -‐ 50) Medium (51 -‐ 200) Large (More than 200)
Expert Analysis: This data aligns fairly well with what we know about the growth cycles
of ecommerce companies. Small companies frequently have a smaller number of overall
customers and are able to devote more individual attention to customers. Also, smaller
companies are less likely to be able to compete with large firms in acquisition costs and
more likely to invest in customer delightion and retention.
Morgan Jacobson
www.Hubspot.com
Blogging is an important part of seeing an ROI with

inbound marketing.
Stat: Companies that focus on SEO and PPC without also investing in blogging are
201% more likely to label proving the ROI from marketing activities as a significant chal-
lenge.
30%
26%
25% 24%
22%
20%
15% 14% 14%

13%
10%
5%
0%
Proving the ROI of our marke<ng Securing enough budget Understanding my contacts
ac<vi<es database
Blog Focused SEO & PPC Focused
Expert Analysis: On-page SEO without a blogging or content creation component is be-
coming less and less effective each year as search engines weigh fresh, unique, valuable
content more and more. It follows, then, that On-page SEO strategies without a blogging
component are driving less revenue and making it more difficult to demonstrate an ROI.
Similarly, companies that focus on PPC, which has seen an explosion in competition in
the last few years are seeing their cost-of-customer-acquisition (COCA) rise and their ROI
fall. On the contrary, relatively lower competition for audiences through blogging leads to
a lower COCA and higher ROI.
Greg Wise
www.Hubspot.com
Companies focused primarily on new customer acqui-

sition are less likely to worry about customer happi-
ness.
Stat: Companies that self-identify as “sales Focused” and are primarily focused on new
customer acquisition over selling to existing customers are 30% less likely to rate “cus-
tomer happiness” as “very important”.
100% 95%
90%
80%
69%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 26%
20%
10% 4%
0%
Very important Somewhat important
Expert Analysis: Companies that aren’t focused on – or aren’t able to – engage in up-
sell/cross-sell/re-sell marketing activities and focus primarily on new customer acquisi-
tion aren’t as concerned with customer happiness, since the happiness of existing cus-
tomers is primarily a factor of LTV. However, these firms may be putting themselves at
risk for negative social proof through negative product reviews or reviews in social media
that might eventually end up impeding new customer acquisition anyways.
Ted Ammon
www.Hubspot.com
Calculation of Customer Life Time Value by Company

Size.
Stat: 45% of larger ecommerce businesses calculate the life time value of their custom-
ers.
50%
45%
45%
40% 37%
35%
30%
25%
20% 17%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Calculate LTV
Expert Analysis: This might be due to the fact that, although smaller businesses tend to
self-identify as customer centric more than larger businesses, they lack the resources to
effectively track, calculate, and leverage the LTV of their customers as a marketing met-
ric. The larger a company is, the more likely it is that they can dedicate analytics resourc-
es to calculating customer life time value.
Morgan Jacobson
www.Hubspot.com
Stat: 96% of businesses that saw ROI from inbound marketing rate raising the lifetime
value of existing customers as a somewhat or very important marketing activity.
4%
26%
69%
Very important Somewhat important Somewhat unimportant
Expert Analysis: Inbound marketing can have huge implications for new customer ac-
quisition, but one of the key advantages in building an experience that customizes itself
to the buyer instead of forcing the buyer to adjust to the experience is that customers
remain more loyal and spend more over time – growing LTV.
Greg Wise
www.Hubspot.com
Customer Segmentation
Stat: On average, 72% of ecommerce businesses implement some form of customer
segmentation.
Social Media Interac6ons

9%
25% Website Page Views
9%
Based on Buyer Personas
18% We don’t segment our

customers
24% Product Purchase History
Expert Analysis: It’s encouraging to see only 24% of marketers not segmenting their
contacts in some way. On the flip side, it’s discouraging that 24% of marketers still aren’t
segmenting their database in any way. The most popular method of segmentation is
based on product purchase history, which is the easiest since that data is processed in
most shopping cart software. Segmenting based on buyer personas and social media
interactions is more sophisticated and usually requires some kind of specialized contact
management software, so it’s understandably lower.
Ted Ammon
www.Hubspot.com
Customer Segmentation and LTV Calculation
Stat: Companies that are focused on tracking and increasing customer lifetime value are
790% more likely to segment their customers.
35%
31%
30% 28%
25%
25% 23%
20%
15%
15%
11% 10%
10% 9% 8% 9%
5%
0%
Product Purchase Based on Buyer Website Page Views Social Media We don’t segment our
History Personas InteracCons customers
Calculates LTV Does Not Calculate LTV
Expert Analysis: Companies that are focused on increasing the value of existing cus-
tomers rather than primarily focusing on new customer acquisition get more value from
segmenting their databases to engage in personalized marketing. Buyer persona seg-
mentation actually exceeds segmenting on website page views (which is a more widely
adopted form of behavioral segmentation).
Morgan Jacobson
www.Hubspot.com
Remarketing Channels
Stat: 25% of marketers use email for remarketing to existing customers, making it the
most popular channel followed closely by social media.
13%
25%
11%
12%
24%
Email Social Media Blog Paid Campaign Search Engine Marke<ng
Expert Analysis: One surprising finding is that email adoption is so low, even though it
still tops the list. This method has been around for quite a while, so seeing social media
follow so closely is very interesting. It’s encouraging to see so many ecommerce market-
ers using a sophisticated enough integration with their social media channels to follow
and pro-actively engage existing customers in social media.
Greg Wise
www.Hubspot.com
Customer Education
Adoption and distribution of pre-transactional con-
versions.
Stat: 58% of ecommerce marketers use educational content for pre-transactional con-
versions.
17% 12%
9%
58%
Coupons Educa3onal Content (Guides, Feature Sheets)

Aspira3onal content No non-‐transac3onal oﬀers
Expert Analysis: It’s definitely encouraging to see ecommerce marketers relying less on
coupons. It’s also encouraging that only 17% of the respondents report having no con-
version options outside of completing a purchase. Historically, the contacts databases of
most ecommerce companies were filled primarily with existing customers, with very few
contacts converted earlier in the consumer buying cycle and nurtured to make purchas-
es.
Ted Ammon
www.Hubspot.com
Customer focused companies use less coupons, more

educational content.
Stat: Companies that self-identify as customer focused rather than sales focused are
491% more likely to use educational content than coupons.
80%
70%
70%
63%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20% 18%
12%
10%
0%
Coupons Educa=onal Content
*Educational Content includes Guides, Feature Sheets and Aspirational Content
Expert Analysis: Both sales-focused and customer-focused companies are significantly

more likely to use educational content as pre-transactional conversion events (usually
someone filling out a form in exchange for a piece of content) than coupons.
Morgan Jacobson
www.Hubspot.com
Larger companies are more likely to use educational

content.
Stat: Large companies are 25% more likely to use educational content to convert con-
tacts prior to a sale than small companies.
90%
80%
80% 76%
70% 64%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20% 13%
10% 11%
10%
0%
Coupons EducaEonal Content
Expert Analysis: Coupons are a very low barrier-to-entry for pre-transactional content.
It’s built in to most ecommerce shopping cart platforms natively, so it’s not surprising
that smaller companies are more likely to rely on those than educational content – which
takes time to write and often requires design resources that small businesses don’t have
easy access to.
Greg Wise
www.Hubspot.com
Stat: Businesses that offer educational content on their website are 527% more likely to
see ROI from inbound marketing (IM) than businesses who offer coupons.
80% 76%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
12%
10%
0%
See ROI from Inbound Marke<ng
Coupons Educa<onal Content
Expert Analysis: Although some marketers try to use them this way, coupons aren’t
actually inbound marketing. Therefore, it follows that marketers that don’t have any ed-
ucational pre-transactional content on their site will see a higher ROI. In fact, marketers
who use coupons and no educational content are 150% less likely to see an ROI from
inbound marketing. Coupons can be very beneficial when used during the proper phases
of the buying cycle, but when you rely on coupons to fill the top of your funnel, you’ll only
attract price-sensitive customers. Using coupons instead of content to re-engage exist-
ing customers can actually turn those customers who weren’t price sensitive and make
them that way.
Ted Ammon
www.Hubspot.com
Stat: 42% of ecommerce marketers prefer social media to educate consumers.
8%
10%
42%
20%
3%
Ebook Webinar Email Podcast Social Media Posts
Expert Analysis: This is somewhat surprising! Social media posts tend to be more ef-
fective when used in a communicative manner rather than educational due to the limited
amount of time that consumers are exposed to them. Email’s popularity makes sense,
since that’s still the primary way that people digest new information. Ebooks and we-
binars and podcasts are all harder to produce, so their lack of popularity is also under-
standable.
Morgan Jacobson
www.Hubspot.com
Marketing Spend
Stat: Only 36% of companies that spend less than $25k/year on marketing see an ROI
from inbound marketing. Companies that spend at least $25k/year on marketing are
178% more likely to say that they saw an ROI from inbound marketing.
100%
90% 2% 2%
20%
80% 8%
70%
68%
60%
50%
40% 8% 7%
39%
30% 10%
20%
36%
10%
0%
Less than $25,000 $25,001 -‐ $250,000 $250,001 -‐ $1,000,000 $1,000,001 -‐ $5,000,000 Over $5,000,000
Sees ROI from Inbound MarkeEng Does Not See ROI from Inbound MarkeEng
Expert Analysis: It’s difficult to imagine a company spending less than $25k/year on
marketing having the resources to implement inbound marketing. Content creation alone
will probably cost at least that much in order to be effective, if only in terms of the salary
required to hire a dedicated marketer. Spending less than $25k, the owner (this group
skews heavily in favor of being very small businesses) likely has to do all the marketing
themselves in addition to running the business, a significant – though not obviously com-
pletely insurmountable – challenge. What’s encouraging is that a relatively small invest-
ment in marketing (from the perspective of slightly larger small businesses and mid-sized
businesses) has a very high likelihood of seeing an ROI from inbound marketing.
Greg Wise
www.Hubspot.com
Stat: Companies that spend less than $25k/year on marketing are 23% more likely to
rely on coupons than educational content. Larger companies ($5M+/year on marketing)
are 50% more likely to rely on coupons.
100%
90%
80% 48% 6%
27%
70% 11%
60% 8%
50%
40%
30% 59% 9%
24%
20% 7%
10% 2%
0%
Less than $25,000 $25,001 -‐ $250,000 $250,001 -‐ $1,000,000 $1,000,001 -‐ $5,000,000 Over $5,000,000
Coupons EducaAonal Content

Expert Analysis: It’s interesting that the extremely small businesses and the larger busi-
nesses share this characteristic. For the small businesses, it’s likely that they don’t have
time or resources to create educational content. For the larger businesses, it’s more likely
just internal resistance to investing in more educational content when they’re already
seeing an ROI. At any rate, the rapid-growth-focused mid-sized companies are much
more likely to invest in educational content.
Ted Ammon
www.Hubspot.com
Visits and Customer Sources

Stat: Organic search remains the largest driver of ecommerce traffic, at 22% on average.
However, social media has now passed PPC and Email with 17.37% of traffic share.
Sources of Visits

10% 14% Email
13% Social Media
17% Direct Website

Organic Search
Referrals
22%
19% PPC
Expert Analysis: Ecommerce sites have long relied on organic search as the primary
driver of traffic. PPC’s declining importance is likely a reflection of marketers getting
more sophisticated around attributing customer acquisition costs and the climbing costs
of clicks. It’s extremely surprising to see social media having such a large share of the
traffic. Perhaps it shouldn’t be, with the fantastic success of sites like Pinterest.
Morgan Jacobson
www.Hubspot.com
Stat: Direct and organic search traffic are the primary drivers of ecommerce customers
with 40% of total customers attributed to those two sources.
Sources of Customers

9%
16% Email
15% Social Media
Direct Website
15%
Organic Search
20% Referrals
20% PPC
Expert Analysis: Referrals and email both have slightly disproportionate levels of cus-
tomers attributed to them based on the amount of traffic they drive, which is interesting
to see. Also noteworth is the fact that traffic from social media is the most disparate from
the amount of just visitors it drives.
Greg Wise
www.Hubspot.com
Personalization
Stat: 65% of businesses are investing in marketing personalization.
40%
37% 36%
35%
30%
30% 27%
25%
20%
15%
11% 10%
10% 8% 7%
5%
0%
Important Somewhat Important Somewhat Unimportant Not Important
Personalized Email Personalized Website
Expert Analysis: Personalization is a harder inbound tactic to deploy, usually requiring

specialized software and a centralized contacts management database. Although some
shopping carts have the functionality built in natively for product recommendations, the
percentage of marketers using it in email indicates that it’s rapidly expanding into other
channels.
Ted Ammon
www.Hubspot.com
Stat: 74% of businesses who got a majority of their customers from email, rated person-
alized emails as at least somewhat important.
60%
50% 48%
40%
30% 26%
20%
10% 8%
5%
0%
Personalized Email Ra0ng
Expert Analysis: It follows that marketers who get lots of value from email would invest
in getting more – and email personalization is the next level of contextual marketing.
Morgan Jacobson
www.Hubspot.com
Stat: 82% of businesses who got a majority of their customers from direct & organic,
rated personalized product recommendations as at least somewhat important.
50%
45%
45%
40% 37%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
11%
10% 7%
5%
0%
Personalized Website Ra1ng
Expert Analysis: This is a little interesting because organic and direct traffic are less
directly controllable channels. That is, you can’t pro-actively email or post to those chan-
nels to attract traffic. So, the emphasis on personalization and conversion optimization
and helping those customers discover more products makes sense.
Greg Wise
www.Hubspot.com
Shopping Cart Insights

Stat: 60% of marketers don’t know their current cart abandonment rate.
Cart Abandonment Rate
10% 0 – 10%
7% 11 – 20%
21 – 30%
7%
31 – 40%
4%
60% 41 – 50%
3%
3% 51 – 60%
2%
2%
61 – 70%
Greater than 70%
Don’t know
Expert Analysis: This is an astounding statistic. Shopping cart nurturing is usually the
lowest hanging fruit for ecommerce marketers to rapidly drive more revenue. If you’re not
at least tracking this metric, you need to.
Ted Ammon
www.Hubspot.com
Stat: Of marketers that can track cart abandonment, only 42% of companies are nurtur-
ing abandoned carts. B2C companies are 128% more likely to implement cart nurturing
than B2B Companies.
90% 84%
80%
70% 63%
60%
50%
40% 37%
30%
20% 16%
10%
0%
B2B B2C
Implements Cart Nurturing Does Not Implement Cart Nurturing
Expert Analysis: It’s still the minority of ecommerce marketers that are engaging in cart
abandonment activities. It makes sense that B2C has a higher level of abandoned cart
nurturing. In B2B, you usually have a human involved in some capacity with the sales
process. In B2C, you have only one “sales rep” - your shopping cart + marketing au-
tomation – and it has to engage with sometimes hundreds of thousands of contacts a
month. Therefore, implementations like cart abandonment tend to have much greater
leverage in B2C companies.
Morgan Jacobson
www.Hubspot.com
Stat: Of marketers that track cart abandonment, 66% successfully recover less than
20% of abandoned carts.
Cart Recovery Rate

2% 2% 4% 0 – 10%
7%
11 – 20%
7% 21 – 30%
43%
31 – 40%
12% 41 – 50%
51 – 60%
61 – 70%
23% Greater than 70%
Expert Analysis: A quarter of marketers are recovering 21-50% of carts. With the aver-
age cart abandonment rate at 13% (once you exclude those that don’t track it), that’s a
significant revenue lift.
Greg Wise
www.Hubspot.com
Cart Nurturing
Stat: 59% of ecommerce marketers primarily use email for abandoned cart nurturing.
Cart Nurturing Channels

4%
8% Email
14% Social Media
Blog
5% 59% Direct Phone Call
11% Direct Mail
Other
Expert Analysis: Email was the expected clear winner. Surprising, however, are the num-
ber of companies that follow up with a direct phone call (mostly B2B ecommerce com-
panies) and the number of companies using social media in cart recovery. Again, that
requires a fairly sophisticated software alignment between the cart, a contacts manage-
ment database, and their social media channels.
Ted Ammon
www.Hubspot.com
Stat: 75% of companies did not know if abandoned cart nurturing demonstrated ROI for
them.
100%
90% 4%
80%
70%
60% 3%
50%
40% 14%
30%
20%
10% 1%
0%
B2B B2C
Cart Nurturing Demonstrated ROI Cart Nurturing Did Not Demonstrate ROI
Stat: Customer-focused companies are 12% more likely to demonstrate ROI from cart
nurturing than sales-focused companies
16% 15%
14%
12%
10%
10%
9% 8%
8%
6%
6% 5% 5%
4%
2%
2%
0%
Sales focused Customer focused Product focused Marke<ng focused
www.Hubspot.com
Stat: 46% of businesses that tracked abandoners’ spending stated that customers spent
more than the original cart value after being nurtured.
9%
14%
46%
31%
More than original amount spent Less than original amount spent Don't spend at all Other
Expert Analysis: Cart abandonment is often considered a negative metric. However, as

we’ve discussed elsewhere, consumers don’t think of their path to purchase as a linear
progression. The fact that the largest cohort of recovered cart abandoners are those that
spend more money is a further reinforcement that other motivations – such as education,
timing, and trust – are motivations that marketers can address instead of just using cou-
pons and framing the abandonment nurturing solely from the perspective of price.
Morgan Jacobson
www.Hubspot.com
Stat: 31% of marketers use coupons in abandoned cart nurturing.
10% 7%
7%
14%
18%
13%
31%
Ebooks Webinars Customer Reviews Coupon Codes Newsle?er Direct Mail Other
Expert Analysis: Coupons tend to be the most gratifying solution, so it’s not surprising
they’re the most popular. What’s surprising is that 14% of marketers are doing aban-
doned cart nurturing with direct mail. It’s not a channel typically associated with the near-
real-time requirements of abandonment nurturing.
Greg Wise
www.Hubspot.com
Stat: Using educational content is 32% more likely to recover cart abandoners that
spend more than the original amount than using coupon codes.
45%
40% 38%
35%
29%
30%
25%
20% 16%
15%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Educa1onal Content Coupon Codes
More than original amount spent Less than original amount spent
Expert Analysis: It makes sense: Coupon codes recover price-sensitive customers and
inherently reduce the amount they’re spending without encouraging them to add addi-
tional products to offset the unit discounts. Educational content addresses non-price
issues and better positions the marketer for up-sell/cross-sell activities when they return
to the cart. Also, consumers are becoming savvier around cart abandonment – with mag-
azines and shopping tips websites even telling consumers to abandon carts to receive
coupons, thereby increasing the number of costly deal-seeking customers you acquire
with coupons.
Ted Ammon
www.Hubspot.com
Stat: 72% of marketers that do abandoned cart nurturing send the first message within
the first day.
4% 2%
8% 21%
14%
51%
Within 1 hour of the abandonment 1 – 24 hours 25 – 48 hours 49 – 72 hours 3 -‐ 7 days A>er 1 week
Expert Analysis: Data from ecommerce and B2B direct sales, as well as common sense
back up that consumers will be easier to connect with and more likely to be receptive
to converting the quicker you engage with them. Within 1 hour you run the risk of losing
consumers who just hadn’t finished browsing or checking out yet, which is especially
dangerous if your first message contains a coupon instead of educational content.
Morgan Jacobson
www.Hubspot.com
Stat: Businesses that send the first nurturing message within 1 hour of the abandonment
are 326% more likely to see ROI from abandoned cart nurturing.
100%
90%
80% 52%
5%
70% 14%
10%
60%
50%
40%
30% 81%
6%
20% 8%
4%
10%
0%
1 – 24 hours 25 – 48 hours 49 – 72 hours 3 -‐ 7 days
Stat: 60% of customers that were sent the first nurturing message within an hour of re-
covering their cart spent more money than the original cart value.
100%
90%
80%
56%
11%
70% 4% 4%
60%
50% 4%
40%
30%
70%
10%
20% 3% 3%
10%
0% 0%
1 – 24 hours 25 – 48 hours 49 – 72 hours 3 -‐ 7 days A8er 1 week
More than original amount spent Less than original amount spent
Expert Analysis: There’s definitely a diminishing value here that backs up conventional
wisdom in this case: The earlier you send the first email, the more likely you are to re-
cover the abandoner and the more likely they are to spend more than they had originally
planned. 0% of marketers who reported waiting a week to send the first nurturing mes-
sage reported that the carts they recovered spent more.
Greg Wise
www.Hubspot.com
Stat: Customers who receive nurturing emails with product descriptions included are
52% more likely to spend more money than the original cart value when they return.
60%
52%
50%
40% 37%
30%
20% 17%
13%
8%
10% 6% 5% 5%
0%
Descrip3on of the Addi3onal product Product how-‐to videos Product Guides /
product (Text and/or recommenda3ons Ebooks
Text & Pictures)
More than original Less than original
Expert Analysis: It’s a pity that not enough people are collecting “use case” information
in pre-transactional conversions (that is, collecting information about why or for what the
customer wanted to use a given product) for us to use that data, because being able to
remind people why they wanted something is a powerful ability. At the very least, how-
ever, this data backs up that you should reference what the customer wanted when they
came to you. What’s interesting is that recommending additional products was the one
category likely to cause the customer to spend less money. Educating and persuading
seems to be effective; confusing cross-selling seems to be detrimental.
Ted Ammon
www.Hubspot.com
Stat: 49% of marketers who send abandoned cart nurturing emails include a description
of the products in the cart.
60%
52%
50%
40% 37%
30%
20% 17%
13%
8%
10% 6% 5% 5%
0%
Descrip3on of the Addi3onal product Product how-‐to videos Product Guides /
product (Text and/or recommenda3ons Ebooks
Text & Pictures)
More than original Less than original
Expert Analysis: Personalizing the message with data about the actual product the
customer was interested in is the most popular method. However, still 17% of marketers
aren’t including any product messaging – even though customers nurtured with such
content are more likely to spend more when they return.
Morgan Jacobson
www.Hubspot.com
Stat: On average, 57% of abandoners revisit the website with 1-5 days. However, busi-
nesses that send their cart abandonment messages within 24 hours of abandonment are
14% more likely to get those customers back to their website within 5 days.
Revisit Timing
3%
3% 4% 1 – 5 Days
3%
4% 6 – 10 days
6% 10 – 15 Days
15 – 20 Days
20 – 25 Days
57%
25 – 30 Days
21%
More than 30 Days
Never revisit
www.Hubspot.com
Survey Methodology
HubSpot fielded our 2014 State of Ecommerce Marketing Survey between
January 07 and February 02, 2014. The query took the form of an online
survey, to which there were 1,099 qualified complete and partial responses
from marketing and business professionals in 45 countries on six continents,
including North America, Europe, Asia/Pacific, Australia, South/Central
America, and Africa.
Survey respondents included business owners, marketing practitioners,

marketing managers, marketing directors, CEOs, CMOs, and agency sales
and IT professionals from the ecommerce industry.
The sampling method was an incentivized, non-probability, voluntary sample

composed of HubSpot prospects having expressed the willingness via opt-
in to receive marketing-related email messages and those responding to
invitations via social media promotion on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter.
As the goal of this survey was to assess the market saturation level of
inbound ecommerce marketing tactics (which are often decoupled from the
larger framework), we did not exclude any responses, including those who
indicated they did not implement inbound marketing strategies specifically.
For visual purposes, we eliminated “don’t know” and/or “not applicable”
responses from various analyses.
The incentive for participating in the survey was entry into a contest to win
either a free iPad or $500.
To request further information about the design or conduct of this survey-

based study, please contact research@hubspot.com.
www.Hubspot.com

State of Ecommerce Marketing

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

State of Ecommerce Marketing

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

THE STATE OF

At HubSpot, our founding mission is to

We also believe engaging consumers means much more than simply

Every year, HubSpot releases the State of Inbound Marketing report

We are incredibly excited to share our first State of Ecommerce Marketing

What is Inbound Marketing?

A Note On Channel Distinction

For example, depending on how it is deployed,

Inbound Marketing Adoption

B2B Ecommerce marketers still lead in overall In-

Stat: 54% of B2C ecommerce companies implement inbound marketing, compared to

Larger revenue businesses lag in adopting inbound

Implements Inbound MarkeAng Does Not Implement Inbound MarkeAng

Large companies lag in adopting inbound marketing.

Stat: 67% of marketers at ecommerce companies invest in blogging.

Invests in Blogging Does Not Invest in Blogging

Marketer investment in frequency.

Expert Analysis: As adoption of blogging as a marketing method grows, ecommerce

B2C vs. B2B ecommerce blogging adoption.

Blogging adoption based on company priorities.

Expert Analysis: Although “customer centricity” is still an imprecisely defined term

Blogging and Inbound Marketing ROI.

Invests in Blogging Does Not Invest in Blogging

Blogging and Customer Life Time Value.

Success in organic search optimization and blogging.

Company Focus & Priorities

Stat: Overall, 40% of inbound commerce companies are customer focused.

Sales focused Customer focused Product focused Marke9ng focused

See ROI from Inbound Marke;ng

Smaller companies tend to be more customer focused.

Blogging is an important part of seeing an ROI with

15% 14% 14%

Blog Focused SEO & PPC Focused

Companies focused primarily on new customer acqui-

Calculation of Customer Life Time Value by Company

Very important Somewhat important Somewhat unimportant

Social Media Interac6ons

Based on Buyer Personas

18% We don’t segment our

Customer Segmentation and LTV Calculation

Calculates LTV Does Not Calculate LTV

Email Social Media Blog Paid Campaign Search Engine Marke<ng

Coupons Educa3onal Content (Guides, Feature Sheets)

Customer focused companies use less coupons, more

Expert Analysis: Both sales-focused and customer-focused companies are significantly

Larger companies are more likely to use educational

Coupons Educa<onal Content

Stat: 42% of ecommerce marketers prefer social media to educate consumers.

Ebook Webinar Email Podcast Social Media Posts

Coupons EducaAonal Content

Visits and Customer Sources

Sources of Visits

17% Direct Website

Sources of Customers

Personalized Email Personalized Website

Expert Analysis: Personalization is a harder inbound tactic to deploy, usually requiring

Shopping Cart Insights

Cart Abandonment Rate

Greater than 70%

Cart Recovery Rate

Cart Nurturing Channels

Expert Analysis: Cart abandonment is often considered a negative metric. However, as

Stat: 31% of marketers use coupons in abandoned cart nurturing.