Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PII: S0002-8703(22)00126-0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2022.06.002
Reference: YMHJ 6587
Please cite this article as: Dave Dixon PharmD , Jaideep Patel MD , Rowan Spence BS ,
Azita Talasaz PharmD , Antonio Abbate MD, PhD , Barbara S. Wiggins PharmD , Select Drug-Drug
Interactions with Colchicine and Cardiovascular Medications: A Review, American Heart Journal
(2022), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2022.06.002
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition
of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of
record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published
in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that,
during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal
disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Dave Dixona,b,*, PharmD; Jaideep Patelb,c, MD; Rowan Spencea, BS; Azita Talasaza,b, PharmD; Antonio
Abbateb, MD, PhD; Barbara S. Wigginsd, PharmD
a
Department of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond,
Virginia
b
Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Baltimore, Maryland
c
Johns Hopkins Heart Center at Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
d
Department of Pharmacy Services, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
*
Corresponding Author: Dave L. Dixon, PharmD, FACC, Nancy L. and Ronald H. McFarlane
Associate Professor of Pharmacy, Chair, Department of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science,
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy, 410 N. 12th St., Box 980533, Richmond,
Virginia, Phone: (804) 628-3784 | Email: dldixon@vcu.edu
Funding: none
Disclosures: none
Abstract
Several randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the clinical utility of colchicine in the prevention
cardiovascular disease, acute and chronic pericarditis, and atrial fibrillation. As a result, it is reasonable
to anticipate increased use of colchicine within the cardiovascular specialty. However, colchicine is
metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and a substrate of the efflux transporter, P-
glycoprotein (P-gp), creating the potential for clinically significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs).
Therefore, when colchicine is administered concomitantly with other cardiovascular agents that inhibit
CYP3A4 or P-gp, there is an increased risk of significant DDIs, potentially leading to negative sequelae.
1
This article summarizes the evidence supporting the use of colchicine for cardiovascular disease,
describes the mechanisms behind DDIs with select cardiovascular medications, and provides
suggestions regarding colchicine dosing and management of DDIs to minimize the risk of poor
disease; AUC, area under the curve; BCRP, breast cancer resistance protein; Cmax, maximum serum
concentration; CYP450, cytochrome P450; DDI, drug-drug interaction; FDA, Food and Drug
Introduction
Colchicine has been used widely for various ailments for a millennium and was originally
derived from the Colchicum autumnale plant (1). The active ingredient, colchicine, was isolated in the
1800’s and subsequently used primarily for the prevention and treatment of gout and Familial
Mediterranean Fever. Despite its extensive use, it was not until 2009 that colchicine gained approval by
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (1). More recently, colchicine has been investigated
cardiology.
2
The exact mechanism of action for colchicine remains elusive, but is largely based upon its anti-
inflammatory properties, which has recently been shown to have efficacy for inflammatory conditions
beyond gout, including acute and chronic cardiovascular disease (2). It has been postulated that
microtubule formation and enables mitosis and regulates intracellular transport (3). As a result,
colchicine impairs the migration of inflammatory cells and the growth of vascular smooth muscle cells
and fibroblasts. Furthermore, the inhibition of intracellular signaling also prevents assembly of the
NLRP3 inflammasome; without this inflammasome, interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β) and other interleukins
cannot be released, blunting the pro-inflammatory response (4). Additional anti-inflammatory effects of
colchicine include impairment of platelet-leukocyte interaction and the activation and adhesion of T
lymphocytes (4).
Colchicine is an effective option for the treatment and prevention of acute and recurrent
pericarditis (5-9). Additional trials have also found colchicine to be effective at preventing post-
pericardiotomy syndrome in patients undergoing cardiac surgery (10-11). Aside from the expected
increased frequency of diarrhea, colchicine was well tolerated in these trials. Currently, there are no
North American guidelines that provide recommendations for the role of colchicine in pericarditis
management; however, European guidelines recommend colchicine as first line adjunct therapy to anti-
inflammatory agents for the treatment of acute pericarditis and recurrences (12). The recommended dose
is 0.5 mg daily in those weighing < 70 kg and 0.5 mg twice daily for those > 70 kg with a treatment
3
duration of 3 months; however, higher doses (~1 mg twice daily) may also be used as a loading dose on
day 1 and for acute flare ups (10). It also should be noted the 0.5 mg dose of colchicine is not available
in the United States and Canada, where 0.6 mg is the only available dose. Although this represents a
atherothrombotic disease. The use of colchicine was given a Class IIb recommendation (i.e.,
usefulness/efficacy is less well established by evidence/opinion), after traditional risk factors are
optimized for the secondary prevention of ASCVD, in the 2021 European Society of Cardiology
The Colchicine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (COLCOT) evaluated the efficacy of low-dose
colchicine (0.5 mg daily) in secondary prevention in patients within 30 days of a myocardial infarction
(14). After 22.6 months, the primary composite endpoint of death from cardiovascular causes,
myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, stroke, or urgent hospitalization for angina leading to
coronary revascularization occurred in 5.5% of patients treated with colchicine compared to 7.1% in the
placebo group (P=0.02). Additionally, The Low Dose Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of
Cardiovascular Disease (LoDoCo) found a significant reduction in the primary composite endpoint of
time to first acute coronary syndrome event, cardiac arrest with resuscitation, and non-cardioembolic
ischemic stroke with colchicine compared to placebo (5.3% vs. 16%; P<0.0001) after 3 years of follow
up (15).
4
A follow up study, Low Dose Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease 2
(LoDoCo2) also observed a reduction in the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death,
spontaneous myocardial infarction, ischemic infarction, ischemic stroke, and ischemia driven coronary
revascularization with colchicine 0.5 mg daily compared to placebo (6.8% vs. 9.6%; P<0.001) in
patients with chronic coronary disease (median follow-up, 28.6 months) (16). In the Colchicine to
Improve Cardiovascular Outcomes in ACS Patients (COPS) trial, there was no significant difference in
the occurrence of the primary outcome of all-cause mortality, acute coronary syndrome,
revascularization, and noncardioembolic stroke in those treated with colchicine (6.1%) compared to
placebo (9.5%; P=0.09) (17). It is unclear as to the reasons for the disparity of these findings compared
to the other trials; however, the COPS trial may have been underpowered. Given the growing body of
A meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials including 13,125 patients evaluated the effect
of colchicine versus placebo/standard therapy in both acute and chronic coronary artery disease (19).
Colchicine reduces the risk of MI and stroke by 36% (OR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46–0.90; P=0.01) and 50%
(OR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31–0.81; P=0.005), respectively. However, colchicine does not appear to reduce
all‐ cause and cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.65–1.41; P=0.83; and OR 0.82; 95% CI,
0.55–1.22; P=0.45, respectively). As expected, colchicine was associated with a higher risk of
gastrointestinal side effects (OR 2.21; 95% CI, 1.45–3.36; P=0.0002). Given the increased risk of non-
cardiovascular mortality observed in both the LoDoCo2 and COPS trials, the authors pooled data from 4
5
studies that reported this outcome and found a nonsignificant numerical increase in risk with colchicine
(85 [1.4%] versus 60 [1.0%] cases [OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.90–2.02; P=0.15).
Atrial Fibrillation
the development of atrial fibrillation recurrence as well as post-operative atrial fibrillation. Thus, small
studies have explored the potential of colchicine and its anti-inflammatory effects to mitigate these risks.
A randomized controlled trial of 223 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who were
undergoing catheter ablation received either colchicine 0.5 mg twice daily or placebo (20). After three
months of follow-up, the recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation was 31.1% in the colchicine group
compared to 49.5% in the control group (P=0.10). Furthermore, there were greater improvements in both
In a sub study of the Colchicine for the Prevention of the Post-Pericardiotomy Syndrome
(COPPS) trial, 336 patients initially in sinus rhythm post-operatively were randomized to colchicine
1mg twice daily starting on postoperative day 3 followed by a maintenance dose of 0.5 mg twice daily
for 1 month in patients ≥70 kg and halved doses for patients <70 kg or intolerant to the highest dose, or
placebo (21). At 1 month, the incidence of post-operative atrial fibrillation was significantly lower in the
colchicine group compared to placebo (12% versus 22%, respectively; P=0.021), as was in-hospital
length of stay (9.4±3.7 versus 10.3±4.3 days; P=0.040) and rehabilitation length of stay (12.1±6.1 versus
6
Overview of Drug-Drug Interactions, Enzyme systems and Transporters
(DDIs). The most common DDIs involving colchicine are those mediated by either the cytochrome P450
Cytochrome P450 enzymes are a superfamily of hemoproteins, and their main function is
oxidative catalysis of both endogenous and exogenous substances. Collectively, they are responsible for
the biotransformation of nearly 80% of all medications currently in use (23). The CYP450 superfamily
is further divided into subfamilies that are dependent upon their similarities (24). While over 50 different
CYP450 enzymes have been isolated in humans, only six (CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6,
CYP3A4, and CYP3A5) have been identified as being responsible for metabolizing the majority of
medications used in clinical practice today, of which CYP3A4 plays the largest role (25). Most of these
enzymes are expressed in the liver, however, some are also expressed in extrahepatic tissues (e.g.
Drug interactions involving the CYP450 enzyme system can result in either induction or
inhibition of one or more of these enzymes. Inhibition results in competition between two or more
medications with subsequent increases in serum concentrations of either one or both agents and may
7
lead to toxicity. Induction results in decreased drug serum concentrations that can result in possible loss
of efficacy.
Permeability glycoprotein (P-gp) is an intracellular tissue specific efflux transport system that
belongs to multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1) family encoded by the ATP-binding cassette
subfamily B (ABCB1). It is widely distributed throughout the body, but it primarily located in epithelial
cells that have excretory roles that include the apical surface of epithelial cells lining the small intestine,
bile ducts, pancreatic duct, colon, adrenal gland, and the proximal tubule of the kidneys (27-29). The
primary role of P-gp is to remove toxins from the cell membrane and cytoplasm and minimize tissue
exposure of potentially harmful substrates and to promote their removal via transport into the bile, urine,
and intestine (30). Importantly, there is significant structure-activity overlap that exists between CYP450
metabolism, especially CYP3A4, and P-gp and a large number of medications that display affinity for
both proteins (Figure 1). Thus, many DDIs involve both P-gp and CYP3A4.
The FDA utilizes two pharmacokinetic parameters when evaluating a DDIs—the maximum
serum concentration (Cmax), which represents the peak concentration achieved by the medication
following administration, and the area under the curve (AUC), which is reflective of total body exposure
to a medication. The AUC serves as a better point of reference, as the magnitude increase in AUC from
co-administration of medications can assist in determining the severity of the DDIs due to a standardized
8
classification system. Weak interactions are those resulting in an AUC increase of 1.25 to <2-fold,
moderate interactions have an AUC increase of 2 to 4.9-fold, while severe interactions may result when
the AUC increase is >5-fold (31). However, the AUC increase should not be used as the sole
determinant regarding the clinical significance of DDIs. Evaluation of DDIs should be done utilizing a
systematic approach also taking into consideration the overall clinical significance and potential
Colchicine is primarily metabolized in the liver via CYP3A4 to two major/minor metabolites, 2-
O-demethylcolchicine and 3-O-demethylcolchicine, which make up less than 5% of the parent drug (4).
The elimination of colchicine largely occurs via biliary excretion. Approximately 10-20% of colchicine
is eliminated by the kidneys via the P-gp efflux transporter, which also plays in a role in managing
colchicine concentrations in the plasma through its effect on absorption in the gut (4). Therefore,
colchicine is contraindicated for use with P-gp inhibitors and/or strong CYP3A4 inhibitors, especially in
patients with advanced kidney disease (CrCrl <30 mL/min/1.73m3) or hepatic impairment; however,
colchicine has been used in large clinical trials that included patients with stage 3-4 chronic kidney
disease and concomitantly with potentially interacting medications (e.g., statins, beta-blockers) without
any notable signs of harm. This suggests that the concern may be more theoretical than real, yet it
remains one of the contraindications listed in the prescribing information provided by the FDA.
Colchicine also has a narrow therapeutic index, meaning that there is little difference between
the minimum effective dose and minimum toxic dose; however, this is likely less of a concern with the
9
lower doses of colchicine used for cardiovascular indications (32). The most common adverse effect
associated with colchicine in the clinical trials evaluating colchicine for cardiovascular disease include
gastrointestinal symptoms, which is dose-related and often limits further ingestion and the potential for
rare and severe adverse effects (e.g., pancytopenia, hepatoxicity, rhabdomyolysis) (33). There has also
been concern for colchicine to potentially increase susceptibility to opportunistic infections; however,
the evidence is inconclusive (34). Colchicine may also need to be withheld or initiation paused during
acute illness (e.g., cardiogenic shock) as these patients have generally been excluded from prior studies.
Given the propensity for several cardiovascular medications to be used that also interact with CYP3A4
and P-gp, there is the potential for DDIs to contribute to poor tolerability or colchicine toxicity (Figure
1).
Statins
Statins are primarily metabolized by the liver, albeit to varying degrees (Table 1) (31). As such,
the statins with the greatest potential for significant DDIs primarily include atorvastatin, lovastatin, and
simvastatin, and lovastatin led to increases in serum colchicine concentrations (35). Observational
experience suggests this interaction may help explain the myopathic-related symptoms suffered by those
taking statins (36). The effect of statins on the AUC for colchicine is variable (31); however, one study
reported a 27% increase in the AUC for colchicine when it was administered to healthy volunteers
already taking atorvastatin 40 mg daily (37). In the LoDoCo-2 trial, participants were allowed to receive
concomitant statin therapy (16). During the trial, 95% of participants were on statin therapy at baseline.
Myalgia was only assessed in the cohort from the Netherlands, but the incidence of myalgia was higher
in the colchicine group compared to placebo (21.2% vs. 18.5%; cumulative incidence ratio, 1.15; 95%
10
CI, 1.01-1.31, P-value not reported) and there was one case of rhabdomyolysis in the colchicine group.
Importantly, colchicine is associated with a small risk of rhabdomyolysis when used alone (38).
Although rhabdomyolysis remains incredibly rare with concomitant use of statins and colchicine, there
is a modest increased risk of muscle symptoms, which could result in statin discontinuation or use of
of muscle pain, and when possible, use statins not metabolized by CYP3A4 (e.g., rosuvastatin) (Table 2)
(38). Routine monitoring of creatine phosphokinase (CPK) levels is not recommended by current
practice guidelines; however, it is recommended to obtain a CPK in patients reporting severe muscle
The fibrates, fenofibrate and gemfibrozil, are used primarily for severe hypertriglyceridemia due
to limited evidence supporting their use for ASCVD prevention and increased risk of muscle-related
adverse effects when used in combination with statins (40). Fenofibrate is rapidly hydrolyzed by
esterases to the active metabolite, fenofibric acid, which is then primarily conjugated with glucuronic
acid and excreted in urine. In vitro studies using human liver microsomes indicate that fenofibrate and
fenofibric acid are weak inhibitors of CYP2C19 and CYP2A6, and mild-to-moderate inhibitors of
CYP2C9 (31). Cases of myotoxicity and rhabdomyolysis have been reported, however, are exceedingly
rare (41). Gemfibrozil, on the other hand, is a potent inhibitor of CYP2C9 and undergoes
glucuronidation to become a potent inhibitor of CYP2C8 (31). While there is no cytochrome P450 or
efflux transporter interaction between fibrates and colchicine, there is the potential for
pharmacodynamic synergism given both therapies independently have the potential for muscle toxicity,
albeit rare (42). However, the effect of fenofibrate and gemfibrozil on the AUC of colchicine is
11
unknown. Given the lack of evidence showing clinical benefit with combination fibrate-statin therapy,
this combination should be avoided (Table 2) (39). The benefits and risks of fenofibrate monotherapy
should be considered before adding fibrate therapy to background colchicine and patients should be
counseled to report symptoms of muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness. Patients reporting severe muscle
symptoms and objective muscle weakness should have a CPK level drawn.
β-adrenergic blockers
Beta-adrenergic blockers are frequently used in patients with cardiovascular disease, thus, any
concern for DDIs with colchicine could have significant ramifications. In vitro data suggests that
carvedilol is a strong P-gp inhibitor and influences P-gp similar to verapamil, which may result in
increased levels or effect of colchicine (43). Propranolol may also moderately inhibit P-gp but the
available in vitro data has shown mixed results (43). Metoprolol and atenolol, however, do not interact
with the P-gp system. As such, it has been suggested that carvedilol’s effects on P-gp are not related to
its effect on β-adrenoreceptors but possibly an antioxidant effect, which would reduce the generation of
reactive oxygen species that can induce expression of P-gp (44). Although carvedilol is primarily
metabolized by CYP2D6, it is metabolized partially by CYP3A4, although to a much lesser extent. The
clinical significance of this is unknown (45). Importantly, there are no CYP450-mediated interactions
between β-blockers and colchicine. Beta-blocker use was also quite high in most cardiovascular trials
with colchicine and well tolerated. The prescribing information for colchicine oral solution also
references two pharmacokinetic studies showing no significant increase in colchicine levels when co-
administered with carvedilol (46). It is the opinion of the authors that based on the available data and
primarily theoretical risk, carvedilol and propranolol are likely safe when co-administered with
12
colchicine in patients with stable kidney function (creatinine clearance ≥30 mL/min) (Table 2).
However, routine monitoring for colchicine-related adverse effects, such as gastrointestinal upset, in
patients taking both carvedilol or propranolol and colchicine would still be reasonable. All other beta-
The non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, verapamil and diltiazem, are moderate inhibitors of
both the CYP3A4 enzyme and P-gp (31). Thus, there is potential for significant interactions with
colchicine. Similar increases in the AUC (~40%) and Cmax (~100%) have been observed with both
diltiazem and verapamil (38). Furthermore, cases of neuromuscular toxicity have been reported with co-
administration of colchicine with either diltiazem or verapamil (22). It should be noted that the protocol
for the LoDoCo2 trial was amended during the study to interrupt colchicine administration in patients
who received verapamil, thus further validating the potential concern with colchicine co-administration
(16). Therefore, diltiazem and verapamil should generally be avoided with colchicine, especially in the
setting of severe kidney or hepatic impairment. If diltiazem or verapamil use is unavoidable, the authors
suggest it may be reasonable to decrease the dose of colchicine to 0.3 mg daily (Table 2).
Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, such as amlodipine, however, do not inhibit CYP450
13
Amiodarone and dronedarone are broad-spectrum anti-arrhythmics that prevent or suppress
arrhythmia burden via 1) a prolongation of the myocardial cell-action potential duration and refractory
period and 2) noncompetitive α- and β-adrenergic inhibition. While amiodarone use has been
complicated by safety issues relating to toxicity of the lungs, thyroid, hepatic, and ocular systems,
dronedarone is contraindicated for use in patients with symptomatic heart failure, those with a recent
hospitalization for heart failure, or New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV heart failure,
permanent atrial fibrillation, and may cause hepatotoxicity (47). Amiodarone is metabolized by
CYP3A4 and CYP2C8, and is a potent inhibitor of CYP 3A4, 2C9, 2D6, and 1A2 (48). Dronedarone is
metabolized by and a moderate inhibitor of CYP3A4 and CYP2D6. Considering this, colchicine toxicity
may be augmented with the use of amiodarone or dronedarone, and vice-versa (49). Additionally,
amiodarone and dronedarone are also potent inhibitors of P-gp, which may result in further increases in
colchicine concentrations. However, these are theoretical risks given the limited available clinical data.
Yet, the authors suggest clinicians may consider a lower colchicine dose of 0.3 mg daily to mitigate the
potential risk, especially in patients with severe renal or hepatic impairment (Table 2) (38).
Digoxin
Digoxin is a cardiac glycoside that inhibits sodium-potassium ATPase, an enzyme that regulates
the quantity of sodium and potassium inside cells. The metabolism of digoxin is not dependent upon the
CYP450 system, and digoxin is not known to induce or inhibit the CYP450 system (31). Digoxin is,
however, a substrate of both intestinal and renal P-gp. Further, rhabdomyolysis has been reported with
concomitant use of digoxin and colchicine (38). Considering the narrow therapeutic index of digoxin,
concomitant use with colchicine may theoretically lead to toxic accumulations; however, there is an
absence of evidence to support this. Specifically, drugs that induce or inhibit P-gp have the potential to
14
alter digoxin pharmacokinetics, this is felt to be less likely with colchicine (50). However, close
monitoring for signs and symptoms of muscle toxicity is recommended with concomitant digoxin and
Ranolazine
Ranolazine is an anti-anginal agent that inhibits the late sodium current resulting in reduced calcium
overload and left ventricular diastolic tension. Ranolazine is extensively metabolized by the CYP3A4
enzyme, and to a much lesser extent, CYP2D6 (31). Ranolazine is also a substrate for and transported by
P-gp, thus, significantly increasing the potential for increased colchicine concentrations (38). Although
this is a theoretical risk as there’s no clinical data available, the authors suggest that clinician’s may
consider avoiding concomitant use of ranolazine and colchicine, particularly in the setting of severe
renal or hepatic impairment. If unavoidable, a decrease in colchicine dose to 0.3 mg daily may be
Conclusion
Expanding evidence supporting the use colchicine for the management of pericarditis and secondary
prevention of ASCVD is significant and likely to result in increased use. The current data supports the
role of colchicine as a first-line therapy for acute pericarditis and to prevent recurrence. For secondary
prevention of ASCVD, colchicine may be considered but optimization of traditional risk factors should
take priority. Ongoing clinical trials with colchicine (e.g., CLEAR-SYNERGY) will expand upon our
current knowledge of which patients benefit most from colchicine. Cardiovascular clinicians should be
15
aware that colchicine has the potential for significant DDIs with frequently used cardiovascular
medications. Judicious use of colchicine is warranted in patients receiving therapies metabolized by the
CYP3A4 enzyme, which also often utilize P-gp, to minimize the risk of increased adverse effects and
toxicity.
References
1. Dasgeb B, Kornreich D, McGuinn K, Okon L, Brownell I, Sackett DL. Colchicine: an ancient drug
with novel applications. Br J Dermatol. 2018;178(2):350-356.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15896
4. Deftereos S, Giannopoulos G, Papoutsidakis N, et al. Colchicine and the heart: pushing the
envelope. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(20):1817-1825. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.726
5. Imazio M, Brucato A, Cemin R, et al. Colchicine for recurrent pericarditis (CORP): a randomized
trial. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(7):409-414. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00359
6. Imazio M, Bobbio M, Cecchi E, et al. Colchicine in addition to conventional therapy for acute
pericarditis: results of the COlchicine for acute PEricarditis (COPE) trial. Circulation.
2005;112(13):2012-2016. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.542738
7. Imazio M, Bobbio M, Cecchi E, et al. Colchicine as first-choice therapy for recurrent pericarditis:
results of the CORE (COlchicine for REcurrent pericarditis) trial. Arch Intern Med.
2005;165(17):1987-1991. doi:10.1001/archinte.165.17.1987
8. Imazio M, Belli R, Brucato A, et al. Efficacy and safety of colchicine for treatment of multiple
recurrences of pericarditis (CORP-2): a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised
trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2014;383(9936):2232-2237. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62709-9
9. Imazio M, Brucato A, Cemin R, et al. A randomized trial of colchicine for acute pericarditis. N
Engl J Med. 2013;369(16):1522-1528. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1208536
16
10. Imazio M, Trinchero R, Brucato A, et al. COlchicine for the Prevention of the Post-pericardiotomy
Syndrome (COPPS): a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Heart
J. 2010;31(22):2749-2754. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq319
11. Imazio M, Brucato A, Ferrazzi P, et al. Colchicine for prevention of postpericardiotomy syndrome
and postoperative atrial fibrillation: the COPPS-2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA.
2014;312(10):1016-1023. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.11026
12. Adler Y, Charron P, Imazio M, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of
pericardial diseases: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of
the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Endorsed by: The European Association for Cardio-
Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2015;36(42):2921-2964. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv318
13. Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease
prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(34):3227-3337.
doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484
14. Tardif JC, Kouz S, Waters DD, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Colchicine after
Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(26):2497-2505. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1912388
15. Nidorf SM, Eikelboom JW, Budgeon CA, Thompson PL. Low-dose colchicine for secondary
prevention of cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(4):404-410.
doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.10.027
16. Nidorf SM, Fiolet ATL, Mosterd A, et al. Colchicine in Patients with Chronic Coronary Disease. N
Engl J Med. 2020;383(19):1838-1847. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2021372
17. Tong DC, Quinn S, Nasis A, et al. Colchicine in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The
Australian COPS Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation. 2020;142(20):1890-1900.
doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050771
18. Nidorf SM, Thompson PL. Why Colchicine Should Be Considered for Secondary Prevention of
Atherosclerosis: An Overview. Clin Ther. 2019;41(1):41-48. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.11.016
19. Kofler T, Kurmann R, Lehnick D, et al. Colchicine in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A
Systematic Review and Meta‐ Analysis of Randomized Trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(16).
doi:10.1161/JAHA.121.021198
20. Deftereos S, Giannopoulos G, Efremidis M, et al. Colchicine for prevention of atrial fibrillation
recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation: Mid-term efficacy and effect on quality of life. Heart
Rhythm. 2014;11(4):620-628. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.02.002
21. Imazio M, Brucato A, Ferrazzi P, et al. Colchicine Reduces Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation:
Results of the Colchicine for the Prevention of the Postpericardiotomy Syndrome (COPPS) Atrial
Fibrillation Substudy. Circulation. 2011;124(21):2290-2295.
doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.026153
17
22. Terkeltaub RA, Furst DE, Digiacinto JL, Kook KA, Davis MW. Novel evidence-based colchicine
dose-reduction algorithm to predict and prevent colchicine toxicity in the presence of cytochrome
P450 3A4/P-glycoprotein inhibitors. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(8):2226-2237.
doi:10.1002/art.30389
23. Zanger UM, Schwab M. Cytochrome P450 enzymes in drug metabolism: regulation of gene
expression, enzyme activities, and impact of genetic variation. Pharmacol Ther. 2013;138(1):103-
141. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.12.007
24. Gonzalez FJ, Gelboin HV. Human cytochromes P450: evolution and cDNA-directed expression.
Environ Health Perspect. 1992;98:81-85. doi:10.1289/ehp.929881
25. Wilkinson GR. Drug metabolism and variability among patients in drug response. N Engl J Med.
2005;352(21):2211-2221. doi:10.1056/NEJMra032424
28. Melaine N, Liénard MO, Dorval I, Le Goascogne C, Lejeune H, Jégou B. Multidrug resistance
genes and p-glycoprotein in the testis of the rat, mouse, Guinea pig, and human. Biol Reprod.
2002;67(6):1699-1707. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.102.003558
29. Edwards JE, Alcorn J, Savolainen J, Anderson BD, McNamara PJ. Role of P-glycoprotein in
distribution of nelfinavir across the blood-mammary tissue barrier and blood-brain barrier.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49(4):1626-1628. doi:10.1128/AAC.49.4.1626-1628.2005
30. Hennessy M, Spiers JP. A primer on the mechanics of P-glycoprotein the multidrug transporter.
Pharmacol Res. 2007;55(1):1-15. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2006.10.007
31. Wiggins BS, Saseen JJ, Page RL, et al. Recommendations for Management of Clinically
Significant Drug-Drug Interactions with Statins and Select Agents Used in Patients with
Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation.
2016;134(21):e468-e495. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000456
32. Finkelstein Y, Aks SE, Hutson JR, et al. Colchicine poisoning: the dark side of an ancient drug.
Clin Toxicol Phila Pa. 2010;48(5):407-414. doi:10.3109/15563650.2010.495348
18
34. McEwan T, Robinson PC. A systematic review of the infectious complications of colchicine and
the use of colchicine to treat infections. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021;51(1):101-112.
doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.11.007
35. Bogman K, Peyer AK, Török M, Küsters E, Drewe J. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and P-
glycoprotein modulation. Br J Pharmacol. 2001;132(6):1183-1192. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0703920
36. Baker SK, Goodwin S, Sur M, Tarnopolsky MA. Cytoskeletal myotoxicity from simvastatin and
colchicine. Muscle Nerve. 2004;30(6):799-802. doi:10.1002/mus.20135
37. Davis MW, Wason S. Effect of Steady-State Atorvastatin on the Pharmacokinetics of a Single
Dose of Colchicine in Healthy Adults Under Fasted Conditions. Clin Drug Investig.
2014;34(4):259-267. doi:10.1007/s40261-013-0168-8
38. Colcrys [Package Insert]. Published online July 2009. Accessed June 3, 2021.
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/022351lbl.pdf
40. Sisson EM, Pamulapati L, Bucheit JD, Kelly MS, Dixon DL. Evolving Role of Non-Statin Therapy
for the Management of Dyslipidemia and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: Past, Present, and
Future. Pharmacotherapy. Published online 2018. doi:10.1002/phar.2074
44. Kakumoto M, Sakaeda T, Takara K, et al. Effects of carvedilol on MDR1 -mediated multidrug
resistance: comparison with verapamil. Cancer Sci. 2003;94(1):81-86. doi:10.1111/j.1349-
7006.2003.tb01356.x
45. Iwaki M, Niwa T, Bandoh S, et al. Application of substrate depletion assay to evaluation of CYP
isoforms responsible for stereoselective metabolism of carvedilol. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet.
2016;31(6):425-432. doi:10.1016/j.dmpk.2016.08.007
19
46. Gloperba [Package Insert]. Published online January 2019.
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/210942s000lbl.pdf
47. Dixon DL, Dunn SP, Kelly MS, McLlarky TR, Brown RE. Effectiveness of Pharmacist-Led
Amiodarone Monitoring Services on Improving Adherence to Amiodarone Monitoring
Recommendations: A Systematic Review. Pharmacotherapy. 2016;36(2). doi:10.1002/phar.1697
48. McDonald MG, Au NT, Rettie AE. P450-Based Drug-Drug Interactions of Amiodarone and its
Metabolites: Diversity of Inhibitory Mechanisms. Drug Metab Dispos. 2015;43(11):1661-1669.
doi:10.1124/dmd.115.065623
49. Zagler B, Kaneppele A, Pattis P, et al. Patient risk factors and adverse drug interactions in the
treatment of acute gouty arthritis in the elderly: a case report. Cases J. 2009;2(1):6602.
doi:10.1186/1757-1626-2-6602
50. Wessler JD, Grip LT, Mendell J, Giugliano RP. The P-glycoprotein transport system and
cardiovascular drugs. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(25):2495-2502. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.058
20
Figure 1 Colchicine is now used for several cardiovascular conditions. Colchicine is a substrate for P-gp
and metabolized in the liver by CYP3A4 before being eliminated via the kidneys and bile. Clinicians
should be aware that several cardiovascular medications have the potential to interact with colchicine.
CYP3A4 = cytochrome P450 3A4; CL = clearance; P-gp = p-glycoprotein
Fluvastatin X
Lovastatin X X
Pitavastatin X X
*
Pravastatin
Rosuvastatin X
Simvastatin X X
Table 2. Recommendations for Drug-Drug Interactions with Colchicine and Select Medications
DDI
Interacting Agent Additional Considerations
Risk
Statins
Atorvastatin Regardless of which statin is used, closely monitor for new
Fluvastatin onset muscle pain or weakness; check CPK levels in patients
Lovastatin with severe muscle symptoms or objective muscle weakness
Pitavastatin When possible, it may be reasonable to avoid atorvastatin,
Pravastatin lovastatin, and simvastatin
Rosuvastatin
Simvastatin
21
Fibric acid derivatives
Fenofibrate Generally safe if not on concomitant statin therapy; check
Gemfibrozil CPK levels in patients with severe muscle symptoms or
objective muscle weakness
Avoid use with colchicine if on concomitant statin therapy
Beta-blockers
Atenolol Carvedilol and propranolol are generally safe in patients with
Bisoprolol stable kidney function (creatine clearance ≥30 mL/min)
Carvedilol Other beta-blockers may be safety administered with
Metoprolol colchicine
Propranolol
Calcium channel
blockers Avoid diltiazem and verapamil, especially in the setting of
Amlodipine severe kidneya and/or hepaticb impairment
Diltiazem o If unavoidable, decrease colchicine dose to 0.3
Verapamil mg/day
22