Professional Documents
Culture Documents
They were predominantly hierarchic or organic states with power vested in the
hands of the monarch. But as their economies underwent change culminating in
the industrial revolution, political ideas about how people should be governed
too underwent a change. The American and French revolutions in the latter half
of the 18th century gave a blow to monarchy and brought about republican and
democratic forms of government. Even in countries where democratic ideas had
not gained popularity, the rulers realized that the power can't be managed
entirely by a central authority and that there was a need for decentralisation. The
two major political systems which emerged on the basis of distribution of power
between different political units of a state were unitary and federal systems.
With the changing nature of the state and the economy in the post-War years,
the boundaries between the unitary and federal have become blurred. Today,
most political systems contain some features which are unitary and others which
are federal. So, what have to see is whether a government is basically unitary or
basically federal. In this unit, we will deal with the evolution of these two forms
of government and their core features.
UNITARY GOVERNMENT
Today most of the government systems in the world are based on a unitary
system of government. It is slightly different from the federal model of
government. In a unitary government, the central government has the power to
increase or curtail the power of subnational units. It can create and abolish the
same. U.K., Afghanistan, Italy, China, Saudi Arabia, Spain, etc., are important
examples of the unitary government. The unitary government system is based
on consistency, unity, and identity. That's why the centralization of power and
authority system remains the top priority.
The decision-making power rests with the central government, which the
government shares with the lower-level government when needed. There are not
so many options for change and innovation as the people have a minimal voice
in this government system. There are many merits and demerits of the unitary
government. It is useful in the term that rules and regulations in this government
system remain consistent and equal throughout the country.
Moreover, it is less expensive than the federal government because the number
of powerful people remains very low. In an emergency, it makes timely
decisions compared to the federal government system. But at the same time, the
concept of freedom of speech and expression always remains a low priority.
That's why most of the principles of unitary government are much similar to
that of a dictatorship system of government. Its distinctive feature is given as
follows;
2. Single Government:
A unitary government may or may not have a written constitution. For example,
England and France are unitary states. France has a written constitution, but
England has none.
Unlike a federation, a unitary state may or may not have a rigid constitution,
e.g., the constitution of England is flexible, but that of France is slightly rigid.
5. No Special Judiciary:
There is no need to have a special judiciary with wide powers of judicial veto in
a unitary government. Even the highest court of the U.K., for example, cannot
sit in judgment over the law passed by Parliament.
Advantages of Unitary System
1. For countries that are smaller in size, a unitary structure is the most suitable.
4. There is no chance of conflicts as all the power is vested with the centre.
A unitary system of government is a good system for small nations. Yet, it still
has disadvantages too. And, these are:
1. The unitary system is not suitable for geographically large countries. Because
in unitary system full power is only in the hands of centre and they may
probably not have access to rural areas.
2. Central government may not have any knowledge about the problems and
needs of the people living in rural areas.
4. Under the unitary form of government, the country may face unequal
development and growth. The central government can find it extremely tough to
develop every part of the nation at the same time without delegation of authority
and powers.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
Yet, some powers always remain in the hands of the central government,
including:
International diplomacy;
Foreign affairs:
Decision to start or end a war;
National security;
Taxes;
National budget; and
Immigration policies.
The link between local authorities and central government is usually very
strong, although not all federal systems work in the same way. Of the 27
federations existing today, most are republics and democracies (i.e. United
States, Switzerland, India, Brazil, etc.) but there are also some monarchies, such
as Canada, Belgium and Australia.
2. Separate Government:
In a federal form of government, the centre and the units have separate
governmental apparatus. America is a federation of states. States have,
therefore, separate legislatures and Separate executives.
3. Written Constitution:
A federal government must have a written constitution. As a federation is a
political partnership of various states, there must be a written agreement in the
form of a written constitution.
4. Rigid Constitution:
The constitution of a federation should be more or less rigid. It is regarded as a
sacred agreement, the spirit of which should not be easily violated. A flexible
constitution allows the central government's scope to curtail the federating
states' autonomy.
5. Special Judiciary:
In a federation, there are possibilities of constitutional disputes arising between
the federal centre and the units or between one unit and another. All these
disputes are to be adjudicated in the light of the constitution. For this purpose, a
special judiciary with wide powers must be established. It should act as the
custodian and guardian of the constitution. It should be vested with powers of
declaring any law, national or local, ultra vires if it is at variance with the
articles of the constitution. The constitution is thus the supreme law in a
federation to which both the centric and the state must adhere.
2. As power is divided between the union and the state, this structure is efficient
in terms of governance and administration.
4. The division of powers between the central and state government brings
excellent utilisation of resources. The central government can focus more on
international affairs and the country’s defence, while the state government can
deal with the regional needs.
Along with the advantages of the federal system, there are also some
disadvantages. These are:
1. This system of government is costly because there are many people elected at
the office, both in the centre and the state.