Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Political Law Notes
Political Law Notes
I. BASIC CONCEPTS UNDER THE 1987 CONSTITUTION resolution has been vested by the Constitution
A. Declaration of principles and State policies exclusively in the people, or in which full
Sec. 1: The Philippines is a democratic and discretionary authority has been delegated to a co-
republican State. Sovereignty resides in the people equal branch of the government (separation of
and all government authority emanates from them. powers) cannot be decided upon by the Courts.
International law can become part of the sphere of Justiciable question – deals with matters re: the law
domestic law either by transformation or and its interpretation, not left to the wisdom of the
incorporation. people.
Sec. 2: The Philippines renounces war and adopts Belgica v Ochoa – The Pork Barrel System violates
the generally accepted principles of international law the separation of powers because it is a form of post-
as part of the law of the land. enactment authority in the implementation or
enforcement of the budget.
Transformation requires that an international law be 1. The system permits legislative encroachment
transformed into a domestic law through upon the executive prerogative of implementing
constitutional mechanism such as a local legislation. the law, by giving individual legislators:
Incorporation is when, by mere constitutional a. The power to determine projects after the
declaration, international law is deemed to have the General Appropriations Act (GAA) is passed;
force of domestic law. and
b. Through congressional committees, authority
Generally accepted principles of international law in the areas of fund release and realignment,
1. Renunciation of war the system encroaches on the Executive’s
2. Principles of sovereign immunity power to implement the law.
3. Person’s right to life, liberty and due process Ocampo v Enriquez – In the exercise of his powers
4. Pacta sunt servanda under the Constitution and Administrative Code of
Sec. 6: The separation of Church and State shall be 1987, to allow interment of Marcos at the LNMB,
inviolable. President Duterte decided a question of policy based
Sec. 12: The natural and primary right and duty of on his wisdom that it shall promote national healing
parents in the rearing of the youth for civic efficiency and forgiveness without taint of grave abuse of
and the development of moral character shall receive discretion, Duterte’s decision on that political
the support of the Government. question is outside the ambit of judicial review.
The State, as parens patriae, has an inherent right to D. Checks and balances
aid parents on the moral development of the youth. Congressional oversight is not per se violative, but is
Hence, the provision in the RH Law mandating the integral to separation of powers. However, for a post-
teaching of age – and development – appropriate enactment congressional measure to be valid, it
reproductive health education is not per se must be limited to:
unconstitutional; a ruling on its constitutionality would 1. Scrutiny: Congress’ power of appropriation, i.e.
be premature absent an actual curriculum formulated budget hearings and power of confirmation
by the Dept. of Education. (Imbong v Ochoa) 2. Investigation and monitoring of implementation of
Sec. 16: The State shall protect and advance the laws: using its powers to conduct inquiries in aid
right of the people to a balanced and healthful of legislation
ecology in accord with the rhythm and harmony of RA 6770 which provides that the President may
nature. remove a Deputy Ombudsman is unconstitutional.
Sec. 18: the State affirms labor as a primary social The alter egos and officials in the Executive
economic force. It shall protect the rights of workers department are subject to the Ombudsman’s
and promote their welfare. disciplinary authority which can place at risk the
B. National territory independence of the Office of the Ombudsman.
Archipelagic Doctrine – a body of water studded with E. State immunity
islands, or islands surrounded with water, is viewed General rule: The State cannot be sued
as a unity of islands and waters together forming one Exception: When the State consents to be sued
integrated unit. 1. Express – through general or special law
UNCLOS III has nothing to do with the acquisition or General law
loss of territory. It is a multilateral treaty regulating, a. Act No. 3083: Money claim arising from
among others, sea-use rights over maritime zones. contract express or implied
Territorial waters – 12 nautical miles from baselines b. Torts
Contiguous zone – 24 nautical miles from baselines Liability of local government units in
Exclusive economic zone – 200 nautical miles from case of death or injuries suffered by
baselines reason of defective conditions of roads,
Continental shelves that UNCLOS III delimits streets, public buildings and public
works (Art 2189, CC)
C. Separation of powers
Vicarious liability for special agents – 4. contingent legislation which leaves to another
one who receives a definite and fixed body the business of ascertaining facts
order or commission, foreign to the (T) Tariff powers to the President
exercise of the duties of his office if he (E) Emergency powers to the President
us a special official (Art 2180, CC)
Liability under the Local Government Test for Valid Delegation (ComSu)
Code Completeness test – law sets forth the policy to be
Local government units and their executed, carried out, or implemented by the
officials are not exempt from liability for delegate (Abakada) such that there is nothing left
death or injury to persons or damage to for the delegate to do but to enforce the law (Palaez
property (LGC) v Auditor General 1965)
2. Implied Sufficiency standard test – defines legislative policy,
a. State enters into business contract with marks its limits, maps out its boundaries and
individuals (performing proprietary functions) specifies the public agency to apply it.
b. States commences litigation becoming
vulnerable to counterclaim G. Fundamental powers of the State
c. Inequitable for the State to invoke immunity Police power – inherent and plenary power of the
d. Eminent domain cases state which enables it to prohibit all that is hurtful to
Suits against Government Agencies: the comfort, safety and welfare of society.
1. Incorporated – can be sued if the charter
provides that the agency can sue Test of Valid Exercise
2. Unincorporated Means purpose test
a. If governmental: no suit without consent 1. Lawful subject – the interests of the public
b. If proprietary: suit will lie require such interference and that the subject of
National Housing Authority v Roxas (2015) – the the measure is within the scope of the police
mantle of the State’s immunity from suit did not power
extend to the NHA despite its being a GOCC. PD 2. Lawful means – means employed are reasonably
757 allows NHA to be sued but the universal rule necessary for the accomplishment of the
remains to be that the State may limit the claimant’s purpose and not unduly oppressive upon
action only up to the completion of proceedings individuals
anterior to the state of execution. The power of the
court ends when the judgment is rendered because Reasonable test
government funds and property may not be seized The Court looks at the test of reasonability to decide
pursuant to writs of execution or writs of garnishment whether it encroaches on the right of an individual.
to satisfy such judgments. The functions and public
services of the State cannot be allowed to be Application
paralyzed or disrupted by the diversion of public fund The PWD mandatory discount on the purchase of
from their legitimate and specific objects, and as medicine has a valid subject considering that the
appropriated by law. concept of public use is no longer confined to the
traditional notion of use by the public, but held
Estoppel synonymous with public interest, public benefit,
General Rule: The State cannot be put in estopppel public welfare, and public convenience. The means
by the mistakes or errors of its officials or agents. employed to provide a fair, just and quality health
Exception: where it would operate to defeat the care to PWDs are reasonably related to its
effective operation of a policy adopted to protect the accomplishment, and are not oppressive since the
public, or in those special cases where the interest of discounts can be claimed by the establishments as
justice clearly required it. allowable tax deductions pursuant to RA 9442.
Exception: GOCCs perform proprietary functions This prohibition covers only non-stock, non-
hence, they are subject to taxation. profit educational institutions and its income,
property, and donor’s tax, custom duties, and
Exception to the exception: other taxes imposed by either or both the
a. Government Service Insurance System national government or political subdivisions
(GSIS) on all revenues, assets, property or donations,
b. Social Security System (SSS) used actually, directly, and exclusively for
c. Philippine Health Insurance Corporation educational purposes. (1987 Constitution)
(PHIC)
d. Philippines Charity Sweepstakes Office The exemption does not cover revenues
(PCSO) (NIRC) derived from, or assets used in, unrelated
activities or enterprise.
Constitutional limitations Revenues derived from assets used in the
1. Prohibition against imprisonment for non- operation of cafeterias, canteens, and
payment of poll tax bookstores are also exempt if they are owned
2. Uniformity and equality of taxation and operated by the educational institution as
Test of Valid Classification ancillary activities and the same are located
a. Based upon substantial distinctions which within the school premises. (RMC No. 76-
make real differences 2003)
b. These are germane to the purpose of the
legislation or ordinance Lands, buildings, and improvements actually,
c. Classification applies not only to present directly and exclusively used for educational
conditions but also to future conditions purposes are exempt from property tax,
substantially identical to those of the whether the educational institution is
present proprietary or non-profit.
d. The classification applies equally to all
those who belong to the same class 6. Majority vote of Congress for grant of tax
(Pepsi-Cola v Butuan, 1968) exemption
7. Prohibition on use of tax levied for special
3. Grant by Congress of authority to the purpose
President to impose tariff rates 8. President’s veto power on appropriation,
4. Prohibition against real property taxation of revenue, tariff bills
religious, charitable entities, and educational 9. Non-impairment of jurisdiction of the Supreme
entities Court
To be entitled to the exemption: 10. Grant of power to the local government units
a. it is a charitable institution to create its own sources of revenue
b. real properties are actually, directly and 11. Flexible tariff clause
exclusively used for charitable purpose 12. Exemption from real property taxes
13. No appropriation or use of public money for F. Kinds of taxes
religious purposes A. As to object:
14. Due process a. Personal, poll or capitation tax – tax of a fixed
15. Equal protection amount imposed on persons residing within a
16. Religious freedom specified territory, whether citizens or not (e.g.
Non-establishment clause – no law shall be community tax)
made respecting an establishment of religion, b. Property tax – tax imposed on property, real or
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof personal, in proportion to its value (e.g., real
estate tax)
Free exercise clause – the free exercise and c. Privilege/excise tax – imposed upon the
enjoyment of religious profession and performance of an act, enjoyment of privilege,
worship, without discrimination or preference, or engagement in an occupation, profession, or
shall forever be allowed. business
Limitation of pardon
1. Cannot be granted for impeachment
2. Cannot be granted for violation of election laws
without favorable recommendation of the
COMELEC
3. Granted only after conviction by final judgment
(People v Salle, 1995)
4. Cannot absolve the convict of civil liability (People
v Nacional, 1995)
5. Cannot be granted to cases of legislative contempt
or civil contempt
6. Cannot restore public offices forfeited (Monsanto v
Factoran, 1989)
H. Diplomatic power
It is the President who ratifies a treaty (not the
senate), the Senate merely concurs (Bayan v
Executive Secretary, 2000)
Executive agreements
1. Entered into by the President
2. May be entered into without the concurrence of the
Senate
3. International agreements involving adjustments in
detail carrying out well-established national