10
MW
12
13
14
16
7
18
19
20
2
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James A. Murphy - 062223
Jeff C. Hsu - 246125
MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY
725 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2150
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: | (213) 327-3500
Facsimile: (213) 627-2445
Attomeys for Defendants
MAIN STREET MANAGEMENT LLC and
CECIL MAIN STREET LLC, erroneously
sued as CECIL HOTEL MANAGEMENT
FILED,
Ses Sark
SEP 25 Lv19
sive Ofteer Cock
Deputy
Shei R
ee
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DAVID LAM, an individual; YINNA LAM, an
individual,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CECIL HOTEL MANAGEMENT, INC. a
California Corporation; DOES 1 through 25,
inclusive,
Defendants,
Case No.: BC521927
APPENDIX OF EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT.
OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION OF ISSUES
[Filed & Served Concurrently with: Separate
Statement of Undisputed Material Facts;
Memorandum of Points and Authorities;
Declarations of Jeff C. Hsu; Appendix of
Exhibits }
Reservation No: 140902025798
Date: December 14, 2015
Time: 1:30 p.m.
Dept: 93
Trial Date: February 11, 2016
"APPENDIX OF EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF ISSUESBown
on i
10
i
12
13
4
15
16
17
18
19
20
a
2
23
24
25
26
27
28
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Exhibit No. Description
A. Plaintiff's Complaint for Damages.
B Plaintiff Yinna Lam’s Verified Responses to Special Interrogatories, dated
November 7, 2014
c Plaintiff David Lam’s Verified Responses to Special Interrogatories, dated
November 7, 2014
D Deposition transcript of Detective Wallace Tennelle, taken on July 22, 2015
Deposition transcript of Kelly Yagerlener, taken on August 4, 2015
F County of Los Angeles, Department of Coroner Autopsy Report, Case No. 2013-
01364
DATED: September 25, 2015
JRS.20878050.docx
MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY
By
Te C. Hs N
foreign national, they asked that we go_down
and check it out, and that's why we went.
So you got involved in this prior to the
discovery of her. body?
A, Correct.ora ws
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
a7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 14
Q. Do you recall who it was who got in touch with
the LAPD about looking for their daughter?
No, I don't
Q. How long on that aspect -- how much time did you
13:52 guys spend trying to figure that one out?
A. Figure wnat out?
Cc Q. Where she was or what -- I mean, do you recall
what you did when you went down to Cecil Hotel or -- oF
what _did you do after you heard you've got a missing
person?
A, Well, T recall going to the Cecil Hotel that
day. We set up a conmand post in the lobby. As teams
searching the entire hotel. We needed nore bodies,
personnel, to respond to assist us. Once we got_enough
personnel, we assigned @ team, and we had a hotel
employee who had a master Key that could access the
rooms, and the ~~ what everyone was told to do is they
were assigned floors, and they were to go room to room,
door knock. If there was somebody there, open it and ask
permission to go in and search.
By searching, I don't mean they were going in and
looking in trash cans, pulling out drawers. It was to
look in and see wherever a hunan being could possibly
13:54 hide or be, to check that area. No luggage was opened orsw ne
eu Tw
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 15
anything like that. All closets. Every nook and crann:
of that building where we thought was a room, locked or
unlocked, it was to be opened. It was to be searched.
2. For a person?
A. For a person. And that was it.
@. Okay. How many people did LAPD have involved in
I don't recall offhand. We had quite a few
team:
Do you know how long that search took?
It took quite a while, at least a day, and we
also brought in K9 units. There might have been at
least -- going off memory -- six or seven teams from the
California emergency ~~ I forget what it is. They have
scent dogs, and they were tasked with using the dogs.
After the search had been done, the dogs went through
from top to bottom. 7]
@. Did you
you ever heard of the term "cadaver
A. Yeah, I've heard of cadaver dogs.
Q. Any of those dogs used, to your knowledge?
A, I don't know if any of those dogs were cadaver
dogs because -- they may have been multi-purpose dogs.
So I really couldn't say.
I remember we told them that we were looking for aPage 16
missing person and to get as many K9s or dogs as they
could. They got quite @ few of them there, and they went
and searched ~~
Q. Had you ever investigated --
A, ~~ the hotel.
Q. -- untoward incidents at the Cecil Hotel before?
MR. HSU: Objection. Vague and ambiguous.
BY MR. JOHNSTON
Q. Well, T suppose everything you do is you
investigate untoward incidents. You're in
burglary/honicide.
But have you ever had a -- investigated a reported
crime that happened at the Cecil Hotel before?
No, sir, I haven't,
@. Do you recall -- if you got the call on the Sth
or thereabouts -- February Sth, thereabouts -- how long
had Ms. Lam been missing, if you recall?
A, If T recall, she was due to check out on either
February the Ist or the 31st. She had paid to stay an
extra day. So I'm thinking -- if T recall, maybe
February ist was her last day. Her things weren't
recovered
After that, let's say February the lst or 2nd -~.I'd
sey maybe on the 318t oF the Ist was the last tine she
had been seen at ‘the hotel., And after that, she wentern ewne
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 17
missing
Now, you've heard that they had a video of her?
You've seen that video?
A. Yes, sir, I have.
@. When were you told that they had a video of her?
A. Well, they dign't --
@. A videotape exists --
A. They did not tell us that a video existed. what
happened is we knew that the hotel had video. So there
was a team, two guys, and their duty was simply to look
at all the video from a certain period when she checked
in, I believe
When you say "they," you mean LAPD personnel?
Yeah. Detectives, Tim Marcia and Detective --
an you spell that?
Mearr-e~
a. First name is Tim.
Is he still with LAPD?
Yes, sir, he is, They both are.
The other detective, I just drew @ blank on his
name. Anyway, they were -- if I come up with it, ILL
interject. They were detailed specifically to just look
at the video, and they looked at the video, and
eventually she was seen inside the location.
Is it your thought that the video -- that
when they looked at the video, Mr. Marcia and hiswre
er 8
10
1
12
13
14
15
16
7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 18
partner, that they were the first persons reviewing the
video? Do you have any knowledge of that?
My only knowledge is they were the first people
fron LAPD to view the video.
@. Has it ever been a thought that the video had
been tampered with in any way, shape or form?
AL No.
@. Has anyone brought that up to you before?
That it was tampered with?
Yeah
No
@. Okay. Is the video -- as I understand it, LAPD
has a copy of the video?
A. Yes.
Q. Te that the video, or is it a copy of the video
that they --
It is the download from their system. It's the
original download fiom their system.
@. And who did the downloading, if you know?
A. I don't recall. I think it might have been -- I
think it was Detective Marcia and his partner that
downloaded it.
@. Did --
A, I don't recall if SID came out and did a
download or not. They may have. I don't know. 1 wouldern es wne
10
11
12
13
14
1s
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 19
have to look at the books to..
@. Have you ever heard of any thought that -- of
anybody saying that they thought that the video had been
tampered with prior to -- the reason I'm bringing that
vp, as you know, this has been involved in the Internet,
and supposedly the Internet -~ the supposed experts are
saying that the video has been tampered with.
Do you have any knowledge of that, or was it ever
suspected by LAPD that it had been?
A. Not tampering, no, because when Detective Marcia
and his partner were reviewing the video footage, that
was done at the hotel on the system itself. It wasn't a
copy that was downloaded and then reviewed. We wore
looking at it right then and there in real time.
@. And do you know if anybody asked the people at
the hotel if they had previously reviewed any of that
material to see if Ms. Lam had been seen since she was
last thought to have been seen?
I don't recall
@. Okay. My thought is that the hotel would
ordinarily -- would not just review the video just
review video to see who was there or not. They
it's
somehow warehoused in case they need it. A question
comes up, then they go review it.
Is that your thought as to what had happened whenMe. Marcia had to review the video? “okay. We got it
right here. Here it is. took at it"?
MR. HSU: Objection. Calls for speculation.
THE WITNESS: Could you repeat that question?
BY MR. JOHNSTON:
Q. Sure.
Do you know if anybody had asked -- maybe I asked
Oo er
you this. If I did, I apologize -- if anybody at the
9 hotel had reviewed the video prior to LAPD reviewing the
10 video?
1 A, I don't know,
12
Okay. You may not know it, but has that been an
13 issue raised before? "We should find out whether or not
14 they reviewed this before we did"?
15 A. I don't know if when -- I don't know if when
16 Detective Marcia and his partner were being shown the
17 video room where their equipment was, if they may have
18 asked, “las anybody viewed the video?"
19 I wouldn't have been there. x was still dealing
20 with the search. So they may have asked, but I can't
21 tell you. I don't know if they did’or not
22 @. Do you know which room she was assigned or she
23 rented?
24 CA. _1 don't recall off hand which one she rented,
25 14:04 but I_know that_she was ‘in one; and’ then she was givenaw ne
era we
10
cy
12
13
14
as
16
a
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
another room. “7
Okay. I take it you guys, LAPD, searched both
of those rooms?
AL ves.
@. At the time that you were searching those rooms,
had they been re-rented to other people?
A. If recall, no. The first room, if I recall,
was almost a -- it had multiple beds. It was a
hostel-Like situation where you had multiple people
sleeping in one room. And then my understanding was that
she was then given a room by herself.
And the room by herself, had they re-rented that
room?
A. I don't know
@. Do you know -- did you go into that room
yourself? Do you recall?
A. I did go and look at it, but 1 don't recall if
there was property in there or if it had been rented.
If I recall correctly, the first room she was in
that had multiple beds
I think bunk beds -- that one
hadn't been rented. But the other room, I don't recall.
@. Okay.
MR. JOHNSTON: 1°11 mark as Exhibit 1 a notice of
taking deposition.
(Continued gn Following page.)
aBoones one
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
a7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 22
(Whereupon the document referred to is marked by the
reporter as EXHIBIT 1 for identification.)
MR. JOHNSTON: And then I got a couple of
photographs here off of -~
THE WITNESS: Gable -- Chris Gable was Detective
Marcia's partner.
MR. JOHNSTON: We'll mark as Exhibit 2 a photograph
of -- that I've taken off of the Internet here of the
building. Exhibit 2 is a photocopy of what I believe to
be the Cecil Hotel.
(Whereupon the document referred to is marked by the
reporter as EXHIBIT 2 for identification.)
MR. JOHNSTON: And Exhibit 3 is a photocopy of the
same hotel but different aspect.
(Whereupon the document referred to is marked by the
reporter as EXHIBIT 3 for identification.)
BY MR, JOHNSTO
@. You see those, sir? Do you recognize that as
the Cecil Hotel?
A. Yes, T do.
@. Okay. On one of them T have marked as
Exhibit 2, you can see that -- is that the front of the
Cecil? rt faces on Main street?
A. Yes, it is.
Q. You see on the right-hand side the fire escape?Cro
14:07
14:07
A, Band C. Wings B and C also have stairwells or --
Fire escapes. “7
Q. -- fire escapes; correct?
Page 23
Yes, sir.
Q. And then on Exhibit 3, I believe you can see
a side of the Cecil Hotel taken from 7th Street?
A. Correct.
@. And you can see a stairwell?
MR. HSU: Do you have an extra copy of 3?
NR. JOHNSTON: Oh, I'm sorry.
MR. HSU: Thank you.
BY MR. JOHNSTON
I'm going to -- you can see the building is
I don't know what you call those
Three wings.
@. Three wings. okay.
And I'l] mark on here, starting from left to right,
A. Yes, sir.
@. Do you know if the room that she had after she
left the multi-tenant room -- I'll refer to it as
that -- where she went by herself, did she have access
from her apartment onto the fire escape in that room?
A. Inside the room itself?
Yes.
No. If T recall, the fire escape is accessiblesw ne
eo3r nw
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 24
through the corridor.
@. So you don't have to go through a room to get to
the fire escape?
AL No.
@. Twas wondering. I thought --
MR. JOHNSTON: Off the record.
(Discussion held off the record.)
BY MR. JOHNSTON:
@. From your observation of the Cecil Hotel when
you were there, how do you access the fire escapes’
A. Bach floor -- okay. This would be the
looking at Exhibit 2, the fire escape is on the south
side or the --
@. Front?
A. => southwest corner of the building.
It's on Main Street, this one here. And the
corridor to access all the rooms
there's a corridor --
the corridor leads south, dead ends, you make a right.
There's a window, and you can raise the window to access
the fire escape on each floor.
Okay. So as I asked before, just to put it into
context, a person wanting to get out of the fire escape
does not need to go through a hotel apartment. You can
s+ it's just common area. You can go through the -- down
any corridor and then open the window?