Regulating scientific research in the aquatic field
 New law implemented in April 2018
i. Regulates what scientists extract from the water and the
scientists themselves
 Information can’t be published freely
i. Right to freedom of speech is limited
 Personal information on scientists as a new requirement
i. The long bureaucratic process as a constraint
ii. The committee that gives the approval is not trained to
do so
 Scientists reaction and concerns
 Positive aspects of the new law
i. Decision makers should have knowledge
ii. Information is helpful
 Conclusion
i. Personal point of view
Regulating scientific research in the aquiatic field
Introduction
For/against
Conclusion
-regulate sample gathering
-april 2018
-several constrains
-furor among scientific community and independents
-info can’t be made public
-freedom of speech impediment / unknowledgeable population
-increased concern / not promote research and limit independent
-mandatory cv and personal info
-not trained council to judge
-turmoil cause long bureaucratic process discourage investigations
-good decision makers are aware cause important decisions
-detailed list of info helpful and available
-conclude no control of research or data not good for decision but
hinder research and freedom of speech