Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The rate of using improved drinking water sources is 74.7 % in Ibb city zone, 72.7% in east Ibb, and 64.9% in west Ibb; thus, there is still one out of three households uses unimproved sources
in the whole governorate. Using of improved latrine facilities is 87.1% in Ibb city, while only 41.6 in east zone and 42.2% in west zone while the defecation in open is still a practice of 8% of
households, and nearly one out of two household caretakers were found practicing hand-washing with water and soup after toilet and before meals in the three zones. (SMART survey 2021).
As the war is not taken place in Ibb, the governorate is indirectly affected by the crisis. The deterioration of national economy, losing of income sources and livelihood, the inflation due to
continuous depreciation of local currency and the increase of food and fuel prices are all driven to poor affordability and accessibility resulting in an accepted food quantity and quality,
essential health services and education.
District IDPs
Total
CU2 CU5 Population
1 SMART Results North_2021 UNICEF & MoPHP & CSO Dec. 2021 Preliminary Report
2 FSLA MUAC 2021 CSO, WFP, SCHEMCHA, MoA August - Sept. 2021
3 FSLA Contributing Factors CSO, WFP, SCHEMCHA, MoA August - Sept. 2021 Preliminary Report
4 CMAM programme 2021 Ibb GHO January - Dec. 2021
5 MUAC Screening 2021 Ibb GHO Jul-21
6 NSS survielence system 2021 Ibb GHO Jan - Dec. 2021 HF based Surveilence
7 EPI program 2021 Ibb GHO Jan - Dec. 2021
8 EPI Compaign May 2019 MoPHP May-19
9 EPI Compaign Feb 2021 MoPHP Feb-21 Polio Compaign
Malaria Programme 2013 - MoPHP & WHO 2013 - 2021
10 2021
http://th.nmcpye.org/
Morbidity_Trends 2019 and MoPHP 2019 - 2020
14 2020_ Governorate
15 SMART Survey for 2019 - Ibb MoPHP, UNICEF, Ibb GHO Dec 2018 - Jan 2019 Mar-19
16 SMART Survey 2017 - Ibb MoPHP, UNICEF, Ibb GHO 25 Mar - 6 April 2017 Jun-17
17 FSLA 2020 CSO, WFP, SCHEMCHA, MoA Jul-20 Sept. 2020 Final results
18 IPC AFI 2021 FAO, SCHEMCHA, MoPHP, CSO,January - Feb. 2021 Preliminary phase results
IPC AFI 2020 FAO, WFP, UNICEF, SCHEMCHA, Nov. - Dec. 2020
19 CSO
20 IPC AFI 2018 FAO, WFP, UNICEF, CSO Dec. 2018
21 BSFP Program data 2021 Nutrition Cluster Jan - Dec. 2021
EDEWs 2021 - WHO WHO, MoPHP 2021 https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiNzcxYmFlMTgtYWMwZS00NTU5LTk1Nj
22
23 CMAM programme 2020 Ibb GHO January - Dec. 2021
24 CMAM programme 2019 Ibb GHO January - Dec. 2021
HDS 2013 CSO, MoPHP 14 Sept. - 23 Nov. 2013 Jul-15
25 https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR296/FR296.pdf
26 EDEWs 2020 - WHO WHO, MoPHP 2020
…
Reiability
R2
R1+
R1+
R1+
R1+
R1+
R1+
X
R1+
R1-
R1-
R1-
R1+
R1-
R1-
R1+
R1+
R1-
R1-
R1-
X
STEP 3: ANALYSE EVIDENCE (CURRENT ANALYSIS)
STEP 3A: ANALYSE EVIDENCE ON OUTCOMES
Prevalence of GAM based on WHZ (among children 6-59 months) Trend of GAM based on SMART survey
Include historical data as relevant to support DC, R
Indicator Ibb City Al WHZ 2017 2019 2021
Zone Al Dhihar
Mashannah
GAM based on WHZ from representative surveys 1R2 4.3 GAM 3.9 6.8 4.3
GAM based on WHZ from reanalysed survey data from higher NA Phase 1 2 1
admin level
GAM based on WHZ from sentinel site NA MUAC 4.2 6.2 1.9
GAM based on WHZ from historical data (surveys representative DC15, 6.8 Phase 1 to 2 2 to 3 1 to 2
at the unit of analysis) SMART 2019 R1-
GAM based on WHZ from historical data (surveys representative DC16,R1 3.9
at the unit of analysis) SMART 2017 -
GAM based on WHZ from representative surveys from similar NA
areas
IPC AMN Phase
[Indicate the Phase, in number (between 1 and 5). Refer to IPC 1
AMN Reference Table for details] 2021
Technical Remarks The evidence used in phase clasification is GAM
[Indicate issues with data quality, representativeness, etc., if any; based on WHZ from representative current GAM by MUAC based on FSLA
otherwise, leave it blank] SMART survey(2021
4.1
Prevalence of GAM based on MUAC (among children 6-59 months)
3.1
Indicator DC, R Ibb City Al
Zone Mashannah Al Dhihar
2021
2021
STEP 3: ANALYSE EVIDENCE (CURRENT ANALYSIS)
Step 3B: Analyse evidence on contributing factors and other issues
FOOD CONSUMPTION
Indicator DC, R Ibb City
Zone Al Al Dhihar
Mashannah
Briefly explain how likely is the current level of food Minimum acceptable diet for
consumption among children affecting acute malnutrition in the younger children less than 2 years
area of analysis: is around 10% which has direct
link to increase prevalence of
Technical remarks
[Indicate issues with data quality, representativeness, etc., if any;
otherwise, leave blank]
FOOD DIMENSIONS
Indicator DC, R Ibb City
Zone Al Al Dhihar
Mashannah
How is the current food dimentions as compared to historical Based on historical data, there is
trend? detrioration in acute food insecurity
[From the same period of current analysis in the past; include phase but there is consoldation of
historical evidence; consider seasonality where applicable] population in phase 3 from 30% in 2020
to 60 % in 2021 in Ibb city
Briefly explain how the overall caring and feeding practices is we notice low level of EBF. which
likely to affect acute malnutrition in your area of analysis: strongly affecting on immune system of
children, and susptability for infection.
Another risk factor is the prevelance of
bottle feeding excess 60% which make
the children more susptablie for
infection with detrioration of CU5
nutritional status.
Human capital
Physical capital
Financial capital
Natural capital
Social capital
Policies, Institutions and Processes (PIPs)
Usual/Normal Shocks The Conflict and continued increased
prices have become a usual shock in the
area in addition to IDPs and the
continued depreciation of YR currency
which is a big concern too.
OTHER OUTCOMES
Indicator DC, R Ibb City
Zone Al
Mashannah Al Dhihar
Malaria/fever
50.2 64.8 65.3
Measles
2020 2021
43
Measles 6 43
6
2020 2021
Distribution of population in IPC AFI Classification 2021
2019 2021 T r e n d o f c a r in g a n d fe e d in g p r a c ti c e
Exclusive 26.3% 11.4%
2019 2021
81%
BF under 1
year 81% 65%
65%
26.3%
year
22%
11.4%
Ex clu s ive BF u n d e r 1 ye ar BF u n d e r 2 ye ar
Vaccination coverage in based on survey
2017 2019 2021
Vitamin A 88.2 57.9 61.4
coverage
Polio 84 85.2 96.2
coverage
Measles 80.1 84.9 90.5
coverage
District CU2 CU5 Total Population IDPs
Aldihar 7.2 18.1 234,673 20%
8.8 22.1 20%
Almashanah 154,059
21.2
PLW 2017 2019 2021
17.6
Pregnant 6.2 10.6 21.2
15
Lactating 3.4 15 17.6
Maternal 9.9 4.2 19 10.6 9.9
6.2
3.4 4.2
21
e
18.6%
22%
u n d e r 2 ye ar
te malnutrition
19
17.6
9.9
4.2
g Maternal
2021
STEP 4: DETERMINE PHASE CLASSIFICATION AND POPULATION
ESTIMATES
Ibb City
Zone Al Al Dhihar
Mashannah
Indicator
Evidence Used for Classification: 2
[GAM based on WHZ=1; GAM based on MUAC=2]
Evidence Reliability: R2
[Reliable = R2; IPC Somewhat reliable = R1+/R1-]
How is the current Acute Malnutrition level compared to There is no historical data for Ibb
historical trends for the same period? city zone because it is a new zone
[From the same period of current analysis in the past; include separated from east zone, and
historical evidence; consider seasonality where applicable] there is no data at district level
Phase: 1
[Indicate the Phase number]
Evidence Level: ***
[Acceptable=*, Medium=**, or High=***]
Justification: Narrative must be provided when an area is classified
based on GAM based on MUAC - follow the IPC Malnutrition
Analytical Framework and assess current levels and historical trends
of contributing factors (e.g. food intake, diseases, healthcare, etc.)
and acute malnutrition outcomes (e.g. past GAM based on
WHZ/MUAC data).
Trend of GAM based on SMART survey
WHZ 2017 2019 2021
Phase 1 2 1
Phase 1 to 2 2 to 3 1 to 2
STEP 5: IDENTIFY KEY DRIVERS & LIMITING FACTO
Ibb City Al
Major contributing factor Zone Mashannah
Minor contributing factor
Not a contributing factor
No data
Minimum Dietary Diversity (MDD)
Food Minimum Meal Frequency (MMF)
consumption Minimum Acceptable Diet (MAD)
Minimum Dietary Diversity – Women (MDD-W)
Diarrhoea
Dysentery
Malaria/fever
Diseases Acute Respiratory Infection (ARI)
HIV/AIDS
Cholera or Acute Watery Diarrhoea (AWD)
Measles
Food
dimensions Outcome of the IPC analysis
Exclusive breastfeeding under 6 months
Continued breastfeeding at 1 year
Caring and
feeding Continued breastfeeding at 2 years
practices Bottle feeding among age below 2 years
Introduction of solid, semi-solid or soft foods
Measles vaccination
Polio vaccination
Vitamin A supplementation
Skilled birth attendance
Health seeking behaviour
Health
services and Coverage of outreach programmes – CMAM programme coverage (SAM,
health MAM, or both)
environment Access to a sufficient quantity of water
Access to sanitation facilities
Access to an improved source of drinking water
Practice of handwashing after toilet by household caregiver
N (%) of handwashing before meal by household care givers
Practice
N (%)
Human capital
Physical capital
Financial capital
Natural capital
Basic causes
Social capital
Policies, Institutions and Processes
Usual/Normal Shocks
Basic causes
Summary conclusions
[Explain how you determine if an indicator is a major/minot/not a contributing
factor]
Al Dhihar
The burden of AWD,ARI, measles, and fever are high , so it is classified as major
contributing factors
The IPC AFI classification of targeted district in Ibb city zone was phase 3 so it is
classified as major contributing factor
All caring and feeding practice indicators historicaly low and indetrioration, so it is
classified as major contributing factors
Both usual and ununual shock classified as major contributing factors due to the
curren ecconomic collapse , fuel shortage, elevated food price and active conflect
in the neighboring governorates
Both usual and ununual shock classified as major contributing factors due to the
curren ecconomic collapse , fuel shortage, elevated food price and active conflect
in the neighboring governorates
Projection 1
Seasonabily:
Based on revision of historical data, the peak of acute malnutrition riased on June, so we
suspect the situation of acute malnutrition in the projected period will be worse.
Heavy rains and floods are expected during the projection period that may impact roads
access which in turn affect market functioality, access to health facilities, etc)
Diseases:
Based on current burden of measles , AWD and historical data for the same period in
2021,We expect an increase in the incidence of measles and acute watery diarrhea cases
during the period June- Sep, the AWD mostly as a result of the heavy rains effects on
water sources contamination. This will increase the possibility of nutritional status
deterioration.
We suspect apearance of new mutation of COVID19 in the projected period as happen
with ongiog omicrone without prior warning which may affect on global supply chain and
increase price of food and essential livelhoods items which negatively impact on
nutritional status of CU5.
Food security:
Fuel shortage:
Fuel shortage and increased fuel prices in balck markets will have negative impact on
food prices and will affect the access to essential services like health, food and also the
factionality of HFs. This fuel crisis is expected to continue in the projection period and
thus continue to affect the nutritional status of the population in the area of study.
Distrubtion of Humanitarian Food Assistance:
Continouty of HFA cutting by 30% during the current period is likely to prevail during the
projection period affecting the food access and food consumption of the poor HHs
especialy around 25% of east Ibb houshold depend on NGOs acisstant.
The price of food increase during 2021 by 55%, so we suspect continouse elevation in the
price of food in the projected period which may affect of accessability of food, and this
will detriorate the nutritional status of acute malnutrition.
Confilect:
Unlise the war not taken place in east Ibb, but it suround Ibb which indirectily affect the
economic situation due to increase IDPs load
So, the compenation of sever shortage in fuel supply, continouse cut off HFA, inflation of
IDPs from ongiog conflect of neiboring areas and increase burden of disease especialy
STEP 7: ANALYSE EVIDENCE (PROJECTION CLASSIFICATION)
FOOD CONSUMPTION
Indicator (specify if the indicaror is likely to (a) improve, (b) PROJECTION 1
deteriorate, or (3) remain similar in the projection period DC, R Ibb City Al Al Dhihar
Zone Mashannah
Minimum Dietary Diversity (MDD) DC1 3
Minimum Meal Frequency (MMF) DC1 3
Minimum Acceptable Diet (MAD) DC1 3
Minimum Dietary Diversity – Women (MDD-W)
How is the projected level of dietary intake as compared to
historical trends?
[From the same period of the projection analysis in the past; include
historical evidence; consider seasonality where applicable]
Narative explanation:
(Briefly explain why the sitation is likely to improve, deriorate, or
remain similar)
Malaria/fever DC10 3
Narative explanation:
(Briefly explain why the sitation is likely to improve, deriorate, or
remain similar)
FOOD DIMENSIONS
CURRENT PROJECTION 1
Indicator (specify if the indicaror is likely to (a) improve, (b) DC, R Al
Ibb City Mashannah Al Dhihar
deteriorate, or (3) remain similar in the projection period DC18 b Zone
How is the projected food dimentions as compared to historical Based on IPC AFI 2021 assumtion, the projected
trend? period will be detriorated
[From the same period of the projection analysis in the past; include
historical evidence; consider seasonality where applicable]
Narative explanation:
(Briefly explain why the sitation is likely to improve, deriorate, or
remain similar)
Narative explanation:
(Briefly explain why the sitation is likely to improve, deriorate, or
remain similar)
Narative explanation:
(Briefly explain why the sitation is likely to improve, deriorate, or
remain similar)
Narative explanation:
(Briefly explain why the coverage is likely to improve, deriorate, or
remain the same)
2017 2019 2021
Measles
43
2020 2021
6
Measles 6 43
2021 2020
Malaria/
fever 50.2 64.8 65.3
2019 2021
Exclusive 26.3% 11.4%
BF under 1 81% 65%
year 2
BF under
year 22% 18.6%
T r e n d o f c a r i n g a n d f e e d i n g p r a c ti c e
2019 2021
81%
65%
26.3%
18.6%
22%
11.4%
B F u n d er 2 y ear B F u n d er 1 y ear Ex c l u si v e
STEP 8 : DETERMINE PHASE CLASSIFICATION (PROJECTION CLASSIFICATION)
[Include historical data and status of contributing factors as relevant to support the classification]
Indicator PROJECTION 1
Ibb City Zone Al Mashannah
Evolution compared to typical: How likely will the acute malnutrition 1
level be during projected period compared to historical trends for
the same peojection season?:
[worse = 1; similar = 2; better = 3]
IPC AMN Phase in the Projected Period [Indicate the Phase number]: 2
10.6
6.2
3.4
Pregnant L
2017
T r e n d o f c a r in
EDEWs, the GAM seasonlity
r in all last 3 previous years, also
er, and, ARI are high, the IDPs
tion with ongiong infulx of IDPs
oring governorates and shortage
ng 2021 and current shortage by
data from ESCHAMSHA, all these
ly in derioration of GAM up to
d as suspected by analysis group
GAM in the upper border of phase
26.3%
11.4%
of population in IPC AFI Classification 2021 Ex clu s ive BF
phase2 phase3 phase4 phase5
35% 20% 10% 0
25% 50% 15% 0
phase2 phase3 phase4 phase5
35% 20% 15% 0
30% 45% 15% 0
Trend of PLW acute malnutrition
21.2
19
17.6
15
10.6
Measles
9.9
6.2
3.4 4.2
T r e n d o f c a r in g a n d fe e d in g p r a c ti c e
2019 2021
81%
6
2020 20
65%
26.3%
18.6%
22%
11.4%
Exclu s ive BF u n d e r 1 ye ar BF u n d e r 2 ye ar
Measles
43
2021
STEP 9: IDENTIFY RISK FACTORS TO MONITOR (PROJECTION CLASSIFICATION)
Projection 1
>
>
>
>
>
STEP 10: IDENTIFY STRATEGIC PRIORITY RESPONSE OBJECTIVES