1) The document discusses several situations under Philippine civil law where a person voluntarily fulfills an obligation that is no longer legally binding and cannot recover what was paid or delivered.
2) These include when an obligation has expired due to prescription of action, a minor fulfills a contract without consent after it is annulled, a will is declared void but a heir pays a legacy, or an heir voluntarily pays more than their inheritance share.
3) In all these cases, the document states that the voluntary fulfillment of the obligation is valid and irrecoverable.
1) The document discusses several situations under Philippine civil law where a person voluntarily fulfills an obligation that is no longer legally binding and cannot recover what was paid or delivered.
2) These include when an obligation has expired due to prescription of action, a minor fulfills a contract without consent after it is annulled, a will is declared void but a heir pays a legacy, or an heir voluntarily pays more than their inheritance share.
3) In all these cases, the document states that the voluntary fulfillment of the obligation is valid and irrecoverable.
1) The document discusses several situations under Philippine civil law where a person voluntarily fulfills an obligation that is no longer legally binding and cannot recover what was paid or delivered.
2) These include when an obligation has expired due to prescription of action, a minor fulfills a contract without consent after it is annulled, a will is declared void but a heir pays a legacy, or an heir voluntarily pays more than their inheritance share.
3) In all these cases, the document states that the voluntary fulfillment of the obligation is valid and irrecoverable.
When a right to sue upon a civil obligation has lapsed by extinctive
prescription, the obligor who voluntarily performs the contract cannot recover what he has delivered or the value of the service he has rendered. ART. 1425. When without the knowledge or against the will of the debtor, a third person pays a debt which the obligor is not legally bound to pay because the action thereon has prescribed, but the debtor later voluntarily reimburses the third person, the obligor cannot recover what he has paid ART. 1426. When a minor between eighteen and twentyone years of age who has entered into a contract without the consent of the parent or guardian, after the annulment of the contract voluntarily returns the whole thing or price received, notwithstanding the fact that he has not been benefited thereby, there is no right to demand the thing or price thus returned. ART. 1427. When a minor between eighteen and twenty-one years of age, who has entered into a contract without the consent of the parent or guardian, voluntarily pays a sum of money or delivers a fungible thing in fulfillment of the obligation, there shall be no right to recover the same from the obligee who has spent or consumed it in good faith. ART. 1428. When, after an action to enforce a civil obligation has failed, the defendant voluntarily performs the obligation, he cannot demand the return of what he has delivered or the payment of the value of the service he has rendered. ART. 1429. When a testate or intestate heir voluntarily pays a debt of the decedent exceeding the value of the property which he received by will or by the law of intestacy from the estate of the deceased, the payment is valid and cannot be rescinded by the payer. ART. 1430. When a will is declared void because it has not been executed in accordance with the formalities required by law, but one of the intestate heirs, after the settlement of the debts of the deceased, pays a legacy in compliance with a clause in the defective will, the payment is effective and irrevocable. Legacy -is the act of disposition by the testator in separating from the inheritance for definite purposes, things, rights, or a definite portion of his property.